Control of Cyclin D1, p27Kip1, and Cell Cycle Progression in Human Capillary Endothelial Cells by Cell Shape and Cytoskeletal Tension

The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an essential role in the regulation of cell proliferation during angiogenesis. Cell adhesion to ECM is mediated by binding of cell surface integrin receptors, which both activate intracellular signaling cascades and mediate tension-dependent changes in cell shape and cytoskeletal structure. Although the growth control field has focused on early integrin and growth factor signaling events, recent studies suggest that cell shape may play an equally critical role in control of cell cycle progression. Studies were carried out to determine when cell shape exerts its regulatory effects during the cell cycle and to analyze the molecular basis for shape-dependent growth control. The shape of human capillary endothelial cells was controlled by culturing cells on microfabricated substrates containing ECM-coated adhesive islands with defined shape and size on the micrometer scale or on plastic dishes coated with defined ECM molecular coating densities. Cells that were prevented from spreading in medium containing soluble growth factors exhibited normal activation of the mitogen-activated kinase (erk1/erk2) growth signaling pathway. However, in contrast to spread cells, these cells failed to progress through G1 and enter S phase. This shape-dependent block in cell cycle progression correlated with a failure to increase cyclin D1 protein levels, down-regulate the cell cycle inhibitor p27^Kip1, and phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein in late G1. A similar block in cell cycle progression was induced before this same shape-sensitive restriction point by disrupting the actin network using cytochalasin or by inhibiting cytoskeletal tension generation using an inhibitor of actomyosin interactions. In contrast, neither modifications of cell shape, cytoskeletal structure, nor mechanical tension had any effect on S phase entry when added at later times. These findings demonstrate that although early growth factor and integrin signaling events are required for growth, they alone are not sufficient. Subsequent cell cycle progression and, hence, cell proliferation are controlled by tension-dependent changes in cell shape and cytoskeletal structure that act by subjugating the molecular machinery that regulates the G1/S transition.     

Adhesion-dependent cell cycle progression linked to the expression of cyclin D1, activation of cyclin E-cdk2, and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein

Growth factors and cell anchorage jointly regulate transit through G1 in almost all cell types, but the cell cycle basis for this combined requirement remains largely uncharacterized. We show here that cell adhesion and growth factors jointly regulate the cyclin D1- and E- dependent kinases. Adhesion to substratum regulates both the induction and translation of cyclin D1 mRNA. Nonadherent cells fail to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), and enforced expression of cyclin D1 rescues Rb phosphorylation and entry into S phase when G1 cells are cultured in the absence of substratum. Nonadherent cells also fail to activate the cyclin E-associated kinase, and this effect can be linked to an increased association of the cdk inhibitors, p21 and p27. These data describe a striking convergence in the cell cycle controls used by the two major signal transduction systems responsible for normal and abnormal cell growth. Taken together with our previous studies showing adhesion-dependent expression of cyclin A, they also establish the cell cycle basis for explaining the combined requirement for growth factors and the extracellular matrix in transit through the Rb checkpoint, entry into S phase, and anchorage-dependent growth.     

Progression through the G1-phase of the on-going cell cycle

Cell cycle progression is dependent upon the action of cyclins and their partners the cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs). Each cell cycle phase has its own characteristic cyclin-CDK combination, cyclin D-CDK4,6 and cyclin E-CDK2 being responsible for progression through G(1)-phase into S-phase. Progression through G(1)-phase is regulated by signal transduction cascades activated by polypeptide growth factors and by extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Studies aiming to unravel the molecular mechanism by which these extracellular components activate the cyclin-CDK complexes in the G(1)-phase, are usually performed using serum-starved cells (G(0) cells). These cells are activated by addition of growth factors, or the cells are detached from the substratum by trypsinization and subsequently allowed to re-attach. An alternative approach, however, is to study the effects of growth factors and attachment in the ongoing cell cycle by synchronization of the cells by the mitotic shake-off method. These cells are not serum starved and not actively detached from the substratum. In this contribution it is shown that both methods yield significant different results. These observations demonstrate that data obtained with model systems should be interpreted with care, especially if the findings are used to explain cell cycle progression in cells in an intact organism.     

Integrin-mediated Activation of Focal Adhesion Kinase Is Required for Signaling to Jun NH2-terminal Kinase and Progression through the G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle

The extracellular matrix exerts a stringent control on the proliferation of normal cells, suggesting the existence of a mitogenic signaling pathway activated by integrins, but not significantly by growth factor receptors. Herein, we provide evidence that integrins cause a significant and protracted activation of Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), while several growth factors cause more modest or no activation of this enzyme. Integrin-mediated stimulation of JNK required the association of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) with a Src kinase and p130(CAS), the phosphorylation of p130(CAS), and subsequently, the recruitment of Crk. Ras and PI-3K were not required. FAK-JNK signaling was necessary for proper progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. These findings establish a role for FAK in both the activation of JNK and the control of the cell cycle, and identify a physiological stimulus for JNK signaling that is consistent with the role of Jun in both proliferation and transformation.     

Regulation of breast cancer cell cycle progression by growth factors, steroids and steroid antagonists

The control of human breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro is known to involve complex interactions between steroid hormones, peptide hormones and growth factors. Little is known, however, of the mechanisms by which these factors, alone or in combination, control cell cycle progression and the expression of specific genes involved in cell cycle control. A pre-requisite for such studies is a cellular system in which non-proliferating or slowly proliferating cells can be maintained in a defined environment and stimulated to progress through the cell cycle by addition of hormones and growth factors. Such a system has been developed for T-47D human breast cancer cells: quiescent or slowly proliferating cells maintained in a serum-free medium can be stimulated to increase their rate of cell cycle progression upon a single addition of insulin, IGF-I, EGF, TGF or bFGF. Oestradiol alone was ineffective but caused a significant increase in % S phase cells when added in the presence of insulin. Progestins, in the presence or absence of insulin, had a biphasic effect with an initial increase in cell cycle progression followed by cell cycle arrest. Both antioestrogens and the antiprogestin, RU 486, in the absence of oestrogen or progestin, were potent inhibitors of insulin-induced proliferation. Increases in cell cycle progression were invariably accompanied by acute increases in c-fos and c-myc mRNA levels. Induction of c-myc by oestrogen and 3rogestin was inhibited by antioestrogens and RU 486, respectively. These data illustrate that the culture of breast cancer cells in a serum-free, chemically defined environment provides an excellent model in which to define the role of individual factors involved in breast cancer growth control. The biological data derived from this system provide a basis for identifying and characterizing genes involved in the control of cell cycle progression in human breast cancer.     

Fibronectin promotes cell cycle entry in smooth muscle cells in primary culture

Smooth muscle cell proliferation after arterial injury is regulated by growth factors and components of the extracellular matrix. We have previously demonstrated that fibronectin promotes a phenotypic modulation of freshly isolated rat smooth muscle cells from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype in primary culture and supports the ability of the cells to respond to growth factors. Here, we analyzed if fibronectin promotes cell cycle entry in freshly isolated rat aortic smooth muscle cells during primary culture. Cell cycle analysis showed that cells seeded on fibronectin remained in the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle during the first 6 days of culture. During this period, there was an increased expression of cyclin D1 and p27(KIP1) in the absence of exogenous growth factors. Addition of serum was followed by enhanced cyclin D1 expression, decreased p27(KIP1) levels, hyperphosphorylation of Rb protein, induction of cyclin A and cyclin D3 expression, and cell cycle progression into S phase. The results indicate that fibronectin initiates cell cycle entry in freshly isolated smooth muscle cells by promoting the induction of cyclin D1 and thereby facilitates further cell cycle progression together with growth factors.     

Interplay between proliferation and differentiation within the myogenic lineage.

In muscle cells, as in a variety of cell types, proliferation and differentiation are mutually exclusive events controlled by a balance of opposing cellular signals. Members of the MyoD family of muscle-specific helix-loop-helix proteins which, in collaboration with ubiquitous factors, activate muscle differentiation and inhibit cell proliferation function at the nexus of the cellular circuits that control proliferation and differentiation of muscle cells. The activities of these myogenic regulators are negatively regulated by peptide growth factors and activated oncogenes whose products transmit growth signals from the membrane to the nucleus. Recent studies have revealed multiple mechanisms through which intracellular growth factor signals may interfere with the functions of the myogenic regulators. When expressed at high levels, members of the MyoD family can override mitogenic signals and can cause growth arrest independent of their effects on differentiation. The ability of these myogenic regulators to inhibit proliferation of normal as well as transformed cells from multiple lineages suggests that they interact with conserved components of the cellular machinery involved in cell cycle progression and that similar types of regulatory factors participate in differentiation and cell cycle control in diverse cell types.     

Control of smooth muscle cell proliferation in vascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Smooth muscle cell proliferation has previously been regarded as a central feature in vascular disease. The role of this process has recently been substantially re-evaluated, and we have reconsidered the functional importance of smooth muscle cell proliferation, the origin of proliferating smooth muscle cells in lesions, and the mechanisms whereby smooth muscle cell proliferation is controlled. In this review, we summarize recent progress in the understanding of smooth muscle cell proliferation, with a particular focus on how interactions between the extracellular matrix, smooth muscle cells, and mitogens control critical steps in this process. RECENT FINDINGS: Irrespective of the origin of smooth muscle cells in vascular lesions, fundamental interactions between the extracellular matrix and cell surface integrins are necessary in order to initiate a proliferative response in a quiescent smooth muscle cell, in a similar manner to any non-malignant cell. These interactions trigger intracellular signaling and cell cycle entry, which facilitate cell cycle progression and proliferation by mitogens. In addition, extracellular matrix interactions may also control the availability and activity of growth factors such as heparin-binding mitogens, which can be sequestered by heparan sulfate containing extracellular matrix components and regulate smooth muscle cell proliferation. SUMMARY: New insights into mechanisms whereby the extracellular matrix takes part in the control of smooth muscle cell proliferation suggest a number of putative targets for future therapies that can be applied to increase plaque stability, prevent the clinical consequences of atherosclerosis and improve outcomes after interventional procedures and organ transplantation.     

Dual stimulation of Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase and RhoA by cell adhesion to fibronectin supports growth factor-stimulated cell cycle progression

In cellular transformation, activated forms of the small GTPases Ras and RhoA can cooperate to drive cells through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Here, we show that a similar but substrate-regulated mechanism is involved in the anchorage-dependent proliferation of untransformed NIH-3T3 cells. Among several extracellular matrix components tested, only fibronectin supported growth factor-induced, E2F-dependent S phase entry. Although all substrates supported the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) response to growth factors, RhoA activity was specifically enhanced on fibronectin. Moreover, induction of cyclin D1 and suppression of p21(Cip/Waf) occurred specifically, in a Rho-dependent fashion, in cells attached to fibronectin. This ability of fibronectin to stimulate both Ras/MAPK- and RhoA-dependent signaling can explain its potent cooperation with growth factors in the stimulation of cell cycle progression.     

Integrating the MAP kinase signal into the G1 phase cell cycle machinery

Growth factors and the extracellular matrix provide the environmental cues that control the proliferation of most cell types. The binding of growth factors and matrix proteins to receptor tyrosine kinases and integrins, respectively, regulates several cytoplasmic signal transduction cascades, among which activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, ras --> Raf --> MEK --> ERK, is perhaps the best characterized. Curiously, ERK activation has been associated with both stimulation and inhibition of cell proliferation. In this review, we summarize recent studies that connect ERK signaling to G1 phase cell cycle control and suggest that the cellular response to an ERK signal depends on both ERK signal intensity and duration. We also discuss studies showing that receptor tyrosine kinases and integrins differentially regulate the ERK signal in G1 phase.     

Specific β-containing integrins exert differential control on proliferation and two-dimensional collective cell migration in mammary epithelial cells

Understanding how cell cycle is regulated in normal mammary epithelia is essential for deciphering defects of breast cancer and therefore for developing new therapies. Signals provided by both the extracellular matrix and growth factors are essential for epithelial cell proliferation. However, the mechanisms by which adhesion controls cell cycle in normal epithelia are poorly established. In this study, we describe the consequences of removing the β1-integrin gene from primary cultures of mammary epithelial cells in situ, using CreER. Upon β1-integrin gene deletion, the cells were unable to progress efficiently through S-phase, but were still able to undergo collective two-dimensional migration. These responses are explained by the presence of β3-integrin in β1-integrin-null cells, indicating that integrins containing different β-subunits exert differential control on mammary epithelial proliferation and migration. β1-Integrin deletion did not inhibit growth factor signaling to Erk or prevent the recruitment of core adhesome components to focal adhesions. Instead the S-phase arrest resulted from defective Rac activation and Erk translocation to the nucleus. Rac inhibition prevented Erk translocation and blocked proliferation. Activated Rac1 rescued the proliferation defect in β1-integrin-depleted cells, indicating that this GTPase is essential in propagating proliferative β1-integrin signals. These results show that β1-integrins promote cell cycle in mammary epithelial cells, whereas β3-integrins are involved in migration.     

The extracellular matrix and mitogenic growth factors control G1 phase cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors

Most cell types require both mitogenic growth factors and cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) for proliferation. Over the past few years, these growth requirements have received renewed attention and can now be explained by studies showing that signals provided by growth factors and the ECM are jointly required to stimulate the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that mediate cell-cycle progression through G1 phase. This article summarizes our current understanding of the control of G1 cyclins and CDK inhibitors by growth factors and the ECM. In addition, we have highlighted one or two signal-transduction pathways that presently seem closely linked to regulation of the G1 phase cyclin-CDK system.     

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) expression is regulated by multiple neural differentiation signals

Neuronal differentiation requires exquisitely timed cell cycle arrest for progenitors to acquire an appropriate neuronal cell fate and is achieved by communication between soluble signals, such as growth factors and extracellular matrix molecules. Here we report that the expression of TIMP-2, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, is up-regulated by signals that control proliferation (bFGF and EGF) and differentiation (retinoic acid and NGF) in neural progenitor and neuroblastoma cell lines. TIMP-2 expression coincides with the appearance of neurofilament-positive neurons, indicating that TIMP-2 may play a role in neurogenesis. The up-regulation of TIMP-2 expression by proliferate signals suggests a role in the transition from proliferation to neuronal differentiation. Live labeling experiments demonstrate TIMP-2 expression only on alpha(3) integrin-positive cells. Thus, TIMP-2 function may be mediated via interaction with integrin receptor(s). We propose that TIMP-2 represents a component of the neurogenic signaling cascade induced by mitogenic stimuli that may withdraw progenitor cells from the cell cycle permitting their terminal neuronal differentiation.     

Regulation of p21(cip1) expression by growth factors and the extracellular matrix reveals a role for transient ERK activity in G1 phase.

We have examined the regulation of p21(cip1) by soluble mitogens and cell anchorage as well as the relationship between the expression of p21(cip1) and activation of the ERK subfamily of MAP kinases. We find that p21(cip1) expression in G1 phase can be divided into two discrete phases: an initial induction that requires growth factors and the activation of ERK, and then a subsequent decline that is enhanced by cell anchorage in an ERK-independent manner. In contrast to the induction of cyclin D1, the induction of p21(cip1) is mediated by transient ERK activity. Comparative studies with wild-type and p21(cip1)-null fibroblasts indicate that adhesion-dependent regulation of p21(cip1) is important for proper control of cyclin E-cdk2 activity. These data lead to a model in which mitogens and anchorage act in a parallel fashion to regulate G1 phase expression of p21(cip1). They also show that (a) growth factors and growth factor/extracellular matrix cooperation can have different roles in regulating G1 phase ERK activity and (b) both transient and sustained ERK signals have functionally significant roles in controlling cell cycle progression through G1 phase.     

DWnt4 regulates cell movement and focal adhesion kinase during Drosophila ovarian morphogenesis

Cell motility is regulated by extracellular cues and by intracellular factors that accumulate at sites of contact between cells and the extracellular matrix. One of these factors, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), regulates the cycle of focal adhesion formation and disassembly that is required for cell movement to occur. Recently, Wnt signaling has also been implicated in the control of cell movement in vertebrates, but the mechanism through which Wnt proteins influence motility is unclear. We demonstrate that Drosphila Wnt4 is required for cell movement and FAK regulation during ovarian morphogenesis. Dfrizzled2, Disheveled, and protein kinase C are also required. The DWnt4 cell motility pathway is distinct from both the canonical Wnt pathway and the planar polarity pathway. Our data suggest that DWnt4 facilitates motility through regulation of focal adhesions.     

Ethanol disrupts cell cycle regulation in developing rat cortex interaction with transforming growth factor beta1

Ethanol is a potent teratogenic agent that disrupts several aspects of neuronogenesis, including the proliferation rate of cortical precursors. With regard to corticogenesis, possible targets of ethanol toxicity include soluble factors, like transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1), that regulate cortical growth and cell cycle proteins that control the kinetics of the cell cycle. The effect of ethanol on normal cell proliferation and TGFbeta1-regulated cell proliferation in the developing cortex was assessed using an organotypic slice culture model. Ethanol elongated the cell cycle, possibly through a decrease in the expression of G1 cell cycle protein cyclin D1. Further, ethanol exposure antagonized the anti-proliferative action of TGFbeta1 and blocked TGFbeta1-dependent increases in cell cycle inhibitor p21. Collectively, this evidence suggests that disruption of appropriate cell cycle protein expression and inhibition of TGFbeta1 activity are potential mechanisms underlying the effect of ethanol on cortical development.