Asymmetric distribution of myosin IIB in migrating endothelial cells is regulated by a rho-dependent kinase and contributes to tail retraction

All vertebrates contain two nonmuscle myosin II heavy chains, A and B, which differ in tissue expression and subcellular distributions. To understand how these distinct distributions are controlled and what role they play in cell migration, myosin IIA and IIB were examined during wound healing by bovine aortic endothelial cells. Immunofluorescence showed that myosin IIA skewed toward the front of migrating cells, coincident with actin assembly at the leading edge, whereas myosin IIB accumulated in the rear 15-30 min later. Inhibition of myosin light-chain kinase, protein kinases A, C, and G, tyrosine kinase, MAP kinase, and PIP3 kinase did not affect this asymmetric redistribution of myosin isoforms. However, posterior accumulation of myosin IIB, but not anterior distribution of myosin IIA, was inhibited by dominant-negative rhoA and by the rho-kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, which also inhibited myosin light-chain phosphorylation. This inhibition was overcome by transfecting cells with constitutively active myosin light-chain kinase. These observations indicate that asymmetry of myosin IIB, but not IIA, is regulated by light-chain phosphorylation mediated by rho-dependent kinase. Blocking this pathway inhibited tail constriction and retraction, but did not affect protrusion, suggesting that myosin IIB functions in pulling the rear of the cell forward.     

The role of myosin II motor activity in distributing myosin asymmetrically and coupling protrusive activity to cell translocation

Nonmuscle myosin IIA and IIB distribute preferentially toward opposite ends of migrating endothelial cells. To understand the mechanism and function of this behavior, myosin II was examined in cells treated with the motor inhibitor, blebbistatin. Blebbistatin at > or = 30 microM inhibited anterior redistribution of myosin IIA, with 100 microM blebbistatin causing posterior accumulation. Posterior accumulation of myosin IIB was unaffected. Time-lapse cinemicrography showed myosin IIA entering lamellipodia shortly after their formation, but failing to move into lamellipodia in blebbistatin. Thus, myosin II requires motor activity to move forward onto F-actin in protrusions. However, this movement is inhibited by myosin filament assembly, because whole myosin was delayed relative to a tailless fragment. Inhibiting myosin's forward movement reduced coupling between protrusive activity and translocation of the cell body: In untreated cells, body movement followed advancing lamellipodia, whereas blebbistatin-treated cells extended protrusions without displacement of the body or with a longer delay before movement. Anterior cytoplasm of blebbistatin-treated cells contained disorganized bundles of parallel microfilaments, but anterior F-actin bundles in untreated cells were mostly oriented perpendicular to movement. Myosin II may ordinarily move anteriorly on actin filaments and pull crossed filaments into antiparallel bundles, with the resulting realignment pulling the cell body forward.     

Characterization of Amoeba proteus myosin VI immunoanalog

Amoeba proteus, the highly motile free-living unicellular organism, has been widely used as a model to study cell motility. However, molecular mechanisms underlying its unique locomotion and intracellular actin-based-only trafficking remain poorly understood. A search for myosin motors responsible for vesicular transport in these giant cells resulted in detection of 130-kDa protein interacting with several polyclonal antibodies against different tail regions of human and chicken myosin VI. This protein was binding to actin in the ATP-dependent manner, and immunoprecipitated with anti-myosin VI antibodies. In order to characterize its possible functions in vivo, its cellular distribution and colocalization with actin filaments and dynamin II during migration and pinocytosis were examined. In migrating amoebae, myosin VI immunoanalog localized to vesicular structures, particularly within the perinuclear and sub-plasma membrane areas, and colocalized with dynamin II immunoanalog and actin filaments. The colocalization was even more evident in pinocytotic cells as proteins concentrated within pinocytotic pseudopodia. Moreover, dynamin II and myosin VI immunoanalogs cosedimented with actin filaments, and were found on the same isolated vesicles. Blocking endogenous myosin VI immunoanalog with anti-myosin VI antibodies inhibited the rate of pseudopodia protrusion (about 19% decrease) and uroidal retraction (about 28% decrease) but did not affect cell morphology and the manner of cell migration. Treatment with anti-human dynamin II antibodies led to changes in directionality of amebae migration and affected the rate of only uroidal translocation (about 30% inhibition). These results indicate that myosin VI immunoanalog is expressed in protist Amoeba proteus and may be involved in vesicle translocation and cell locomotion.     

Cytoplasmic force gradient in migrating adhesive cells

Amoeboid movement is believed to involve a pressure gradient along the cell length, with contractions in the posterior region driving cytoplasmic streaming forward. However, a parallel mechanism has yet to be demonstrated in migrating adhesive cells. To probe the distribution of intracellular forces, we microinjected high molecular weight linear polyacrylamide (PAA) as a passive force sensor into migrating NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Injected PAA appeared as amorphous aggregates that underwent shape change and directional movement in response to differential forces exerted by the surrounding environment. PAA injected into the posterior region moved toward the front, whereas PAA in the anterior region never moved to the posterior region. This preferential forward movement was observed only in migrating cells with a defined polarity. Disruption of myosin II activity by blebbistatin inhibited the forward translocation of PAA while cell migration persisted in a disorganized fashion. These results suggest a myosin II-dependent force gradient in migrating cells, possibly as a result of differential cortical contractions between the anterior and posterior regions. This gradient may be responsible for the forward transport of cellular components and for maintaining the directionality during cell migration.     

Relative distribution of actin, myosin I, and myosin II during the wound healing response of fibroblasts

Myosin I is present in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and its localization reflects a possible involvement in the extension and/or retraction of protrusions at the leading edge of locomoting cells and the transport of vesicles, but not in the contraction of stress fibers or transverse fibers. An affinity-purified polyclonal antibody to brush border myosin I colocalizes with a polypeptide of 120 kD in fibroblast extracts. Within initial protrusions of polarized, migrating fibroblasts, myosin I exhibits a punctate distribution, whereas actin is diffuse and myosin II is absent. Myosin I also exists in linear arrays parallel to the direction of migration in filopodia and microspikes, established protrusions, and within the leading lamellae of migrating cells. Myosin II and actin colocalize along transverse fibers in the lamellae of migrating cells, while myosin I displays no definitive organization along these fibers. During contractions of actin-based fibers, myosin II is concentrated in the center of the cell, while the distribution of myosin I does not change. Thus, myosin I is found at the correct location and time to be involved in the extension and/or retraction of protrusions and the transport of vesicles. Myosin II-based contractions in more posterior cellular regions could generate forces to separate cells, maintain a polarized cell shape, maintain the direction of locomotion, maximize the rate of locomotion, and/or aid in the delivery of cytoskeletal/contractile subunits to the leading edge.     

Rapid redistribution of myosin II in livingDictyostelium amoebae,as revealed by fluorescent probes introduced by electroporation

Summary Fluorescently labeled myosin II fromDictyostelium and fluorescently labeled antibody Fab fragments against myosin II fromDictyostellium were introduced into livingDictyostelium amoebae by electroporation. Fluorescent labeling of myosin II impairs neither actin-activated ATPase activity nor the ability to form filaments in vitro. Fluorescently labeled Fab also did not interfere with the functions of myosin II in vitro. After electroporation, introduced fluorescently labeled myosin II was distributed diffusely in the endoplasm but some of it accumulated at the tail cortical region of migrating cells. During the course of observations, intense fluorescence due to myosin II disappeared and then it appeared again instantaneously in the cortical regions during amoeboid movement. Fluorescently labeled Fab, after electroporation, bound to endogenous myosin II in amoebae and the dynamic changes in its distribution were similar to those of fluorescently labeled myosin II. The fluorescence due to myosin II also underwent dynamic redistribution during the division of cells and chemotactic stimulation. The introduction of labeled Fab and labeled myosin II did not impair the motility ofDictyostelium. During changes in direction associated with cell locomotion, myosin II accumulated at the original front region of the cell and, thereafter, the accumulation was observed at the new tail region of the cell. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that myosin II has two possible roles for cell locomotion. One is that myosin II accumulates at tail regions to produce the power required for contraction. The other is that it hinders the extension of pseudopods in directions other than the frontal direction.     

Recruitment of a myosin heavy chain kinase to actin-rich protrusions in Dictyostelium

Nonmuscle myosin II plays fundamental roles in cell body translocation during migration and is typically depleted or absent from actin-based cell protrusions such as lamellipodia, but the mechanisms preventing myosin II assembly in such structures have not been identified [1-3]. In Dictyostelium discoideum, myosin II filament assembly is controlled primarily through myosin heavy chain (MHC) phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of sites in the myosin tail domain by myosin heavy chain kinase A (MHCK A) drives the disassembly of myosin II filaments in vitro and in vivo [4]. To better understand the cellular regulation of MHCK A activity, and thus the regulation of myosin II filament assembly, we studied the in vivo localization of native and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged MHCK A. MHCK A redistributes from the cytosol to the cell cortex in response to stimulation of Dictyostelium cells with chemoattractant in an F-actin-dependent manner. During chemotaxis, random migration, and phagocytic/endocytic events, MHCK A is recruited preferentially to actin-rich leading-edge extensions. Given the ability of MHCK A to disassemble myosin II filaments, this localization may represent a fundamental mechanism for disassembling myosin II filaments and preventing localized filament assembly at sites of actin-based protrusion.     

Myosin phosphatase targeting subunit 1 affects cell migration by regulating myosin phosphorylation and actin assembly

Myosin II plays important roles in many contractile-like cell functions, including cell migration, adhesion, and retraction. Myosin II is activated by regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation whereas RLC dephosphorylation by myosin light chain phosphatase containing a myosin phosphatase targeting subunit (MYPT1) leads to myosin inactivation. HeLa cells contain MYPT1 in addition to a newly identified human variant 2 containing an internal deletion. RLC dephosphorylation, cell migration, and adhesion were inhibited when either or both MYPT1 isoforms were knocked down by RNA interference. RLC was highly phosphorylated (60%) when both isoforms were suppressed by siRNA treatment relative to control cells (10%) with serum-starvation and ROCK inhibition. Prominent stress fibers and focal adhesions were associated with the enhanced RLC phosphorylation. The reintroduction of MYPT1 or variant 2 in siRNA-treated cells decreased stress fibers and focal adhesions. MYPT1 knockdown also led to an increase of F-actin relative to G-actin in HeLa cells. The myosin inhibitor blebbistatin did not inhibit this effect, indicating MYPT1 likely affects actin assembly independent of RLC phosphorylation. Proper expression of MYPT1 or variant 2 is critical for RLC phosphorylation and actin assembly, thus maintaining normal cellular functions by simultaneously controlling cytoskeletal architecture and actomyosin activation.     

The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain

The ability of gliomas to invade the brain limits the efficacy of standard therapies. In this study, we have examined glioma migration in living brain tissue by using two novel in vivo model systems. Within the brain, glioma cells migrate like nontransformed, neural progenitor cells-extending a prominent leading cytoplasmic process followed by a burst of forward movement by the cell body that requires myosin II. In contrast, on a two-dimensional surface, glioma cells migrate more like fibroblasts, and they do not require myosin II to move. To explain this phenomenon, we studied glioma migration through a series of synthetic membranes with defined pore sizes. Our results demonstrate that the A and B isoforms of myosin II are specifically required when a glioma cell has to squeeze through pores smaller than its nuclear diameter. They support a model in which the neural progenitor-like mode of glioma invasion and the requirement for myosin II represent an adaptation needed to move within the brain, which has a submicrometer effective pore size. Furthermore, the absolute requirement for myosin II in brain invasion underscores the importance of this molecular motor as a potential target for new anti-invasive therapies to treat malignant brain tumors.     

Lens fiber cell elongation and differentiation is associated with a robust increase in myosin light chain phosphorylation in the developing mouse

Myosin II, a molecular motor, plays a critical role in cell migration, cell shape changes, cell adhesion, and cytokinesis. To understand the role of myosin II in lens fiber cell elongation and differentiation, we determined the distribution pattern of nonmuscle myosin IIA, IIB, and phosphorylated regulatory myosin light chain-2 (phospho-MLC) in frozen sections of the developing mouse lens by immunofluorescence analysis. While myosin IIA was distributed uniformly throughout the differentiating lens, including the epithelium and fibers, myosin IIB was localized predominantly to the epithelium and the posterior tips of the lens fibers. In contrast, immunostaining with a di-phospho-MLC antibody localized intensely and precisely to the elongating and differentiating primary and secondary lens fibers, co-localizing with actin filaments. An in situ analysis of Rho GTPase activation revealed that Rho-GTP was distributed uniformly throughout the embryonic lens, including epithelium and fibers. Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) activity by ML-7 in organ cultured mouse lenses led to development of nuclear lens opacity in association with abnormal fiber cell organization. Taken together, these data reveal a distinct spatial distribution pattern of myosin II isoforms in the developing lens and a robust activation of MLC phosphorylation in the differentiating lens fibers. Moreover, the regulation of MLC phosphorylation by MLCK appears to be critical for crystallin organization and for maintenance of lens transparency and lens membrane function.     

The regulation of myosin II in Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium conventional myosin (myosin II) is an abundant protein that plays a role in various cellular processes such as cytokinesis, cell protrusion and development. This review will focus on the signal transduction pathways that regulate myosin II during cell movement. Myosin II appears to have two modes of action in Dictyostelium: local stabilization of the cytoskeleton by myosin filament association to the actin meshwork (structural mode) and force generation by contraction of actin filaments (motor mode). Some processes, such as cell movement under restrictive environment, require only the structural mode of myosin. However, cytokinesis in suspension and uropod retraction depend on motor activity as well. Myosin II can self-assemble into bipolar filaments. The formation of these filaments is negatively regulated by heavy chain phosphorylation through the action of a set of novel alpha kinases and is relatively well understood. However, only recently it has become clear that the formation of bipolar filaments and their translocation to the cortex are separate events. Translocation depends on filamentous actin, and is regulated by a cGMP pathway and possibly also by the cAMP phosphodiesterase RegA and the p21-activated kinase PAKa. Myosin motor activity is regulated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain through myosin light chain kinase A. Unlike conventional light chain kinases, this enzyme is not regulated by calcium but is activated by cGMP-induced phosphorylation via an upstream kinase and subsequent autophosphorylation.     

Regulation of polarity in cells devoid of actin bundle system after treatment with inhibitors of myosin II activity

Interplay of two cytoskeletal systems--microfilaments and microtubules is essential for directional cell movement. To better understand the role of those cytoskeletal systems in polarization of cells, rat fibroblasts were incubated with drugs inhibiting activity of myosin II: blebbistatin and Y-27632. Both drugs led to disappearance of actin-myosin bundles and mature focal cell-matrix adhesions but did not affect polarization and directional motility. The rate of motility even increased after inhibitor treatment. The characteristic feature of inhibitor-treated fibroblasts was collapse of the cytoplasm accompanied by bundling of microtubules that led to transformation of lamellae into long immobile tails. The only exception was the leading anterior lamella which was not transformed into the tail and supported directional movement of the cell. The tail at the cell rear determined the position of anterior lamella and direction of locomotion. Depolymerization of microtubules by colcemid stopped directional locomotion of inhibitor-treated cells. These data show that integrity of the microtubular system provides the basic mechanism of polarization and orientation which is only modified by interactions with actin-myosin system and cell-substrate adhesions. We suggest that the position of bundled tail microtubules and dispersed microtubules in leading lamella determine polarization in cells lacking stress fibers and focal adhesions. Thus, polarization is based on microtubule-dependent mechanisms both in non-contractile and contractile cells. These mechanisms could switch dependent on circumstances as fibroblasts may acquire non-contractile phenotype, not only after direct inhibition of myosin II but also in certain conditions of microenvironment.     

Okadaic acid induces phosphorylation and translocation of myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 influencing myosin phosphorylation, stress fiber assembly and cell migration in HepG2 cells

It was determined that the myosin phosphatase (MP) activity and content of myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1) were correlated in subcellular fractions of human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) cells. In control cells MYPT1 was localized in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, as determined by confocal microscopy. Treatment of HepG2 cells with 50 nM okadaic acid (OA), a cell-permeable phosphatase inhibitor, induced several changes: 1) a marked redistribution of MYPT1 to the plasma membrane associated with an increased level of phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr695. Both effects showed only a slight influence with the Rho-kinase inhibitor, Y-27632; 2) an increase in phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr850 associated with its accumulation in the perinuclear region and nucleus. These effects were markedly reduced by Y-27632; 3) an increased phosphorylation of the 20 kDa myosin II light chain at Ser19 associated with an increased location of myosin II at the cell center. These effects were partially counteracted by Y-27632; 4) an increase in stress fiber formation and a decrease in cell migration, both OA-induced effects were blocked by Y-27632. In HepG2 lysates, OA (5-100 nM) did not affect MP activity but inhibited PP2A activity. These results indicate that OA induces differential phosphorylation and translocation of MYPT1, dependent on PP2A and, to varying extents, on ROK. These changes are associated with an increased level of myosin II phosphorylation and attenuation of hepatic cell migration.     

Nonmuscle myosin IIb is involved in the guidance of fibroblast migration

Although myosin II is known to play an important role in cell migration, little is known about its specific functions. We have addressed the function of one of the isoforms of myosin II, myosin IIB, by analyzing the movement and mechanical characteristics of fibroblasts where this protein has been ablated by gene disruption. Myosin IIB null cells displayed multiple unstable and disorganized protrusions, although they were still able to generate a large fraction of traction forces when cultured on flexible polyacrylamide substrates. However, the traction forces were highly disorganized relative to the direction of cell migration. Analysis of cell migration patterns indicated an increase in speed and decrease in persistence, which were likely responsible for the defects in directional movements as demonstrated with Boyden chambers. In addition, unlike control cells, mutant cells failed to respond to mechanical signals such as compressing forces and changes in substrate rigidity. Immunofluorescence staining indicated that myosin IIB was localized preferentially along stress fibers in the interior region of the cell. Our results suggest that myosin IIB is involved not in propelling but in directing the cell movement, by coordinating protrusive activities and stabilizing the cell polarity.     

Localization of actin and myosin for the study of ameboid movement in Dictyostelium using improved immunofluorescence

The distribution of actin and myosin in Dictyostelium amebae at different developmental stages was studied by improved immunofluorescence ("agar-overlay" technique). Both were localized at the cortical region of amebae in all early developmental stages. In amebae with polarized morphology, bright fluorescence with antiactin was seen in the anterior pseudopode. The cortex in the posterior end was also stained with antiactin. On the other hand, very specific crescent-shaped staining with antimyosin was seen at the posterior cortex. In cells in contact with each other, actin was concentrated at the contact region, whereas myosin was localized specifically in the cortex on the other side of the contact region. At the aggregation stage, when monopodial amebae migrate forming streams, actin staining was seen all around the cell periphery, with intense fluorescence in the anterior pseudopode. On the other hand, specific staining of myosin was seen only at the posterior cortex. The cleavage furrow of cells performing cytokinesis displayed distinct myosin staining, and this staining represented the filamentous structure aligned in parallel to the axis of constriction. These findings indicate that myosin staining reflects the portion of the cell cortex where contraction occurs and the motive force of ameboid movement is generated at the posterior cortex of a migrating cell.     

Actomyosin Tension Exerted on the Nucleus through Nesprin-1 Connections Influences Endothelial Cell Adhesion, Migration, and Cyclic Strain-Induced Reorientation

Endothelial cell polarization and directional migration is required for angiogenesis. Polarization and motility requires not only local cytoskeletal remodeling but also the motion of intracellular organelles such as the nucleus. However, the physiological significance of nuclear positioning in the endothelial cell has remained largely unexplored. Here, we show that siRNA knockdown of nesprin-1, a protein present in the linker of nucleus to cytoskeleton complex, abolished the reorientation of endothelial cells in response to cyclic strain. Confocal imaging revealed that the nuclear height is substantially increased in nesprin-1 depleted cells, similar to myosin inhibited cells. Nesprin-1 depletion increased the number of focal adhesions and substrate traction while decreasing the speed of cell migration; however, there was no detectable change in nonmuscle myosin II activity in nesprin-1 deficient cells. Together, these results are consistent with a model in which the nucleus balances a portion of the actomyosin tension in the cell. In the absence of nesprin-1, actomyosin tension is balanced by the substrate, leading to abnormal adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation.     

Segregation and activation of myosin IIB creates a rear in migrating cells

We have found that MLC-dependent activation of myosin IIB in migrating cells is required to form an extended rear, which coincides with increased directional migration. Activated myosin IIB localizes prominently at the cell rear and produces large, stable actin filament bundles and adhesions, which locally inhibit protrusion and define the morphology of the tail. Myosin IIA forms de novo filaments away from the myosin IIB–enriched center and back to form regions that support protrusion. The positioning and dynamics of myosin IIA and IIB depend on the self-assembly regions in their coiled-coil C terminus. COS7 and B16 melanoma cells lack myosin IIA and IIB, respectively; and show isoform-specific front-back polarity in migrating cells. These studies demonstrate the role of MLC activation and myosin isoforms in creating a cell rear, the segregation of isoforms during filament assembly and their differential effects on adhesion and protrusion, and a key role for the noncontractile region of the isoforms in determining their localization and function.     

Structural basis for myosin V discrimination between distinct cargoes

Myosin V molecular motors move cargoes on actin filaments. A myosin V may move multiple cargoes to distinct places at different times. The cargoes attach to the globular tail of myosin V via cargo-specific receptors. Here we report the crystal structure at 2.2 A of the myosin V globular tail. The overall tertiary structure has not been previously observed. There are several patches of highly conserved regions distributed on the surface of the tail. These are candidate attachment sites for cargo-specific receptors. Indeed, we identified a region of five conserved surface residues that are solely required for vacuole inheritance. Likewise, we identified a region of five conserved surface residues that are required for secretory vesicle movement, but not vacuole movement. These two regions are at opposite ends of the oblong-shaped cargo-binding domain, and moreover are offset by 180 degrees. The fact that the cargo-binding areas are distant from each other and simultaneously exposed on the surface of the globular tail suggests that major targets for the regulation of cargo attachment are organelle-specific myosin V receptors.     

Cortical actin turnover during cytokinesis requires myosin II

The involvement of myosin II in cytokinesis has been demonstrated with microinjection, genetic, and pharmacological approaches; however, the exact role of myosin II in cell division remains poorly understood. To address this question, we treated dividing normal rat kidney (NRK) cells with blebbistatin, a potent inhibitor of the nonmuscle myosin II ATPase. Blebbistatin caused a strong inhibition of cytokinesis but no detectable effect on the equatorial localization of actin or myosin. However, whereas these filaments dissociated from the equator in control cells during late cytokinesis, they persisted in blebbistatin-treated cells over an extended period of time. The accumulation of equatorial actin was caused by the inhibition of actin filament turnover, as suggested by a 2-fold increase in recovery half-time after fluorescence photobleaching. Local release of blebbistatin at the equator caused localized accumulation of equatorial actin and inhibition of cytokinesis, consistent with the function of myosin II along the furrow. However, treatment of the polar region also caused a high frequency of abnormal cytokinesis, suggesting that myosin II may play a second, global role. Our observations indicate that myosin II ATPase is not required for the assembly of equatorial cortex during cytokinesis but is essential for its subsequent turnover and remodeling.