Ca2+-dependent dual functions of peptide C. The peptide corresponding to the Glu724-Pro760 region (the so-called determinant of excitation-contraction coupling) of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha 1 subunit II-III loop.

Both in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that the Glu(724)-Pro(760) (peptide C) region of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha1 II-III loop is important for excitation-contraction coupling, although its actual function has not yet been elucidated. According to our recent studies, peptide C inhibits Ca(2+) release induced by T-tubule depolarization or peptide A. Here we report that peptide C has Ca(2+)-dependent dual functions on the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Thus, at above-threshold [Ca(2+)]s (> or =0.1 microm) peptide C blocked peptide A-induced activation of the ryanodine receptor (ryanodine binding and Ca(2+) release); peptide C also blocked T-tubule depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release. However, at sub-threshold [Ca(2+)]s (<0.1 microm), peptide C enhanced ryanodine binding and induced Ca(2+) release. If peptide A was present, together with peptide C, both peptides produced additive activation effects. Neither peptide A nor peptide C produced any appreciable effect on the cardiac muscle ryanodine receptor at both high (1.0 microm) and low (0.01 microm) Ca(2+) concentrations. These results suggest the possibility that the in vivo counterpart of peptide C retains both activating and blocking functions of the skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction coupling.     

T-tubule depolarization-induced local events in the ryanodine receptor, as monitored with the fluorescent conformational probe incorporated by mediation of peptide A.

There is a considerable controversy about the postulated role of the Thr(671)-Leu(690) (peptide A) region of the dihydropyridine (DHP) receptor alpha1 II-III loop. Here we report that peptide A introduced the fluorescence probe methyl coumarin acetamido (MCA) in a well defined region of the ryanodine receptor (RyR), A-site, in a specific manner. Depolarization of the T-tubule moiety of the triad induced a rapid increase of the fluorescence intensity of the MCA attached to the A-site. Other RyR agonists, which activate the RyR without mediation of the DHP receptor (e.g. caffeine, polylysine, and peptide A), induced Ca(2+) release without producing such an MCA fluorescence increase. Both magnitudes of the fluorescence change and Ca(2+) release increased with the increase in the degree of T-tubule depolarization. MCA fluorescence increase at the A-site and subsequent sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release were blocked by blocking of the DHP receptor-to-RyR communication. These results may be accounted for by two alternative models as follows. (a) Upon T-tubule depolarization a portion of the DHP receptor comes close to the RyR, forming a hydrophobic interface (within such an interface the A-site is located), or (b) T-tubule depolarization may produce a local conformational change in the A-site-containing region of the RyR that is not necessarily within the DHP receptor/RyR junction.     

Structural requirements of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha1S II-III loop for skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling

Residues Leu720-Leu764 within the II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha1S subunit represent a critical domain for the orthograde excitation-contraction coupling as well as for retrograde DHPR L-current-enhancing coupling with the ryanodine receptor (RyR1). To better understand the molecular mechanism underlying this bidirectional DHPR-RyR1 signaling interaction, we analyzed the critical domain to the single amino acid level. To this end, constructs based on the highly dissimilar housefly DHPR II-III loop in an otherwise skeletal DHPR as an interaction-inert sequence background were expressed in dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes for simultaneous recordings of depolarization-induced intracellular Ca2+ transients (orthograde coupling) and whole-cell Ca2+ currents (retrograde coupling). In the minimal skeletal II-III loop sequence (Asp734-Asp748 required for full bidirectional coupling, eight amino acids heterologous between skeletal and cardiac DHPR were exchanged for the corresponding cardiac residues. Four of these skeletal-specific residues (Ala739, Phe741, Pro742, and Asp744) turned out to be essential for orthograde and two of them (Ala739 and Phe741) for retrograde coupling, indicating that orthograde coupling does not necessarily correlate with retrograde signaling. Secondary structure predictions of the critical domain show that an alpha-helical (cardiac sequence-type) conformation of a cluster of negatively charged residues (Asp744-Glu751 of alpha1S) corresponds with significantly reduced Ca2+ transients. Conversely, a predicted random coil structure (skeletal sequence-type) seems to be prerequisite for the restoration of skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling. Thus, not only the primary but also the secondary structure of the critical domain is an essential determinant of the tissue-specific mode of EC coupling.     

Spectroscopic monitoring of local conformational changes during the intramolecular domain-domain interaction of the ryanodine receptor

The amino (N)-terminal and central regions of the ryanodine receptor (RyR) containing most mutation sites of malignant hyperthermia (MH) and central core disease (CCD) seem to be involved in the Ca(2+) channel regulation. Our recent peptide probe study (Yamamoto, T., El-Hayek, R., and Ikemoto, N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11618-11625) suggested the hypothesis that a close contact between the N-terminal and central domains (zipping) stabilizes the closed-state of the channel, while removal of the contact (unzipping) deblocks the channel, causing channel-activation effects. We here report the results of our recent effort to monitor local conformational changes in the putative domain-domain interaction site to test this hypothesis. The conformation-sensitive fluorescence probe, methyl coumarin acetamide (MCA), was incorporated into RyR in a protein- and site-specific manner by using DP4 (the peptide corresponding to the Leu(2442)-Pro(2477) region of the central domain) as a site-directing carrier. The site of MCA labeling was localized in the 150 kDa N-terminal region of RyR, indicating that DP4 and its in vivo counterpart (a portion of the central domain) interact with the N-terminal region. RyR-activating domain peptides, DP4 and DP1 (corresponding to the Leu(590)-Cys(609) region of the N-terminal domain), and depolarization of the T-tubule moiety of the triad (physiologic stimulation) induced a rapid decrease in the fluorescence intensity of the protein-bound MCA and Ca(2+) release at a somewhat slower rate. The accessibility of the protein-bound MCA to the fluorescence quencher was increased in the presence of DP4. These results are all consistent with the above hypothesis.     

Conversion of an inactive cardiac dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop segment into forms that activate skeletal ryanodine receptors

A 25 amino acid segment (Glu666-Pro691) of the II-III loop of the alpha1 subunit of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor, but not the corresponding cardiac segment (Asp788-Pro814), activates skeletal ryanodine receptors. To identify the structural domains responsible for activation of skeletal ryanodine receptors, we systematically replaced amino acids of the cardiac II-III loop with their skeletal counterparts. A cluster of five basic residues of the skeletal II-III loop (681RKRRK685) was indispensable for activation of skeletal ryanodine receptors. In the cardiac segment, a negatively charged residue (Glu804) appears to diminish the electrostatic potential created by this basic cluster. In addition, Glu800 in the group of negatively charged residues 798EEEEE802 of the cardiac II-III loop may serve to prevent the binding of the activation domain.     

Three-dimensional location of the imperatoxin A binding site on the ryanodine receptor.

Cryo-electron microscopy and three-dimensional, single-particle image analysis have been used to reveal the specific binding site of imperatoxin A (IpTx(a)) on the architecture of the calcium release channel/ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle (RyR1). IpTx(a) is a peptide toxin that binds with high affinity to RyR1 and affects its functioning. The toxin was derivatized with biotin to enhance its detection with streptavidin. IpTx(a) binds to the cytoplasmic moiety of RyR1 between the clamp and handle domains, 11 nm away from the transmembrane pore. The proposed mimicry by IpTx(a) of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) II-III loop, thought to be a main physiological excitation-contraction trigger, suggests that the IpTx(a) binding location is a potential excitation-contraction signal transduction site.     

A structural requirement for activation of skeletal ryanodine receptors by peptides of the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop

The solution structures of three related peptides (A1, A2, and A9) corresponding to the Thr(671)-Leu(690) region of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop have been investigated using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Peptide A1, the native sequence, is less effective in activating ryanodine receptor calcium release channels than A2 (Ser(687) to Ala substitution). Peptide A9, Arg(681)-Ser(687), does not activate ryanodine receptors. A1 and A2 are helical from their N terminus to Lys(685) but are generally unstructured from Lys(685) to the C terminus. The basic residues Arg(681)-Lys(685), essential for A1 activation of ryanodine receptors, are located at the C-terminal end of the alpha-helix. Peptide A9 was found to be unstructured. Differences between A1 and A2 were observed in the C-terminal end of the helix (residues 681-685), which was less ordered in A1, and in the C-terminal region of the peptide, which exhibited greater flexibility in A1. Predicted low energy models suggest that an electrostatic interaction between the hydroxyl oxygen of Ser(687) and the guanidino moiety of Arg(683) is lost with the Ser(687)Ala substitution. The results show that the more structured peptides are more effective in activating ryanodine receptors.     

T-tubule depolarization-induced SR Ca2+ release is controlled by dihydropyridine receptor- and Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms in cell homogenates from rabbit skeletal muscle

In vertebrate skeletal muscle, the voltage-dependent mechanism of rapid sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release, commonly referred to as excitation-contraction (EC) coupling, is believed to be mediated by physical interaction between the transverse (T)-tubule voltage-sensing dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the SR ryanodine receptor (RyR)/Ca2+ release channel. In this study, differential T-tubule and SR membrane monovalent ion permeabilities were exploited with the use of an ion-replacement protocol to study T-tubule depolarization-induced SR 45Ca2+ release from rabbit skeletal muscle whole-cell homogenates. Specificity of Ca2+ release was ascertained with the use of the DHPR antagonists D888, nifedipine and PN200-110. In the presence of the "slow" complexing Ca2+ buffer EGTA, homogenates exhibited T-tubule depolarization-induced Ca2+ release comprised of an initial rapid phase followed by a slower release phase. During the rapid phase, approximately 20% of the total sequestered Ca2+ (approximately 30 nmol 45Ca2+/mg protein), corresponding to 100% of the caffeine-sensitive Ca2+ pool, was released within 50 ms. Rapid release could be inhibited fourfold by D888. Addition to release media of the "fast" complexing Ca2+ buffer BAPTA, at concentrations > or = 4 mM, nearly abolished rapid Ca2+ release, suggesting that most was Ca2+ dependent. Addition of millimolar concentrations of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ also greatly reduced rapid Ca2+ release. These results show that T-tubule depolarization-induced SR Ca2+ release from rabbit skeletal muscle homogenates is controlled by T-tubule membrane potential- and by Ca(2+)- dependent mechanisms.     

Excitation-contraction coupling is not affected by scrambled sequence in residues 681-690 of the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop

A peptide corresponding to residues 681-690 of the II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor alpha(1) subunit (DHPR, alpha(1S)) has been reported to activate the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in vitro. Within this region of alpha(1S), a cluster of basic residues, Arg(681)-Lys(685), was previously reported to be indispensable for the activation of RyR1 in microsomal preparations and lipid bilayers. We have used an intact alpha(1S) subunit with scrambled sequence in this region of the II-III loop (alpha(1S)-scr) to test the importance of residues 681-690 and the basic motif for skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling and retrograde signaling in vivo. When expressed in dysgenic myotubes (which lack endogenous alpha(1S)), alpha(1S)-scr restored calcium currents that were indistinguishable, in current density and voltage dependence, from those restored by wild-type alpha(1S). The scrambled DHPR also rescued skeletal-type EC coupling, as indicated by electrically evoked contractions in the presence of 0.5 mm Cd(2+) and 0.1 mm La(3+). Furthermore, the release of intracellular Ca(2+), as assayed by the indicator dye, Fluo-3, had similar kinetics and voltage dependence for alpha(1S) and alpha(1S)-scr. These data suggest that residues 681-690 of the alpha(1S) II-III loop are not essential in muscle cells for normal functioning of the DHPR, including skeletal-type EC coupling and retrograde signaling.     

Two domains in dihydropyridine receptor activate the skeletal muscle Ca(2+) release channel

The II-III cytoplasmic loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1)-subunit is essential for skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling. Single channel and [(3)H]ryanodine binding studies with a full-length recombinant peptide (p(666-791)) confirmed that this region specifically activates skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channels (CRCs). However, attempts to identify shorter domains of the II-III loop specific for skeletal CRC activation have yielded contradictory results. We assessed the specificity of the interaction of five truncated II-III loop peptides by comparing their effects on skeletal and cardiac CRCs in lipid bilayer experiments; p(671-680) and p(720-765) specifically activated the submaximally Ca2+-activated skeletal CRC in experiments using both mono and divalent ions as current carriers. A third peptide, p(671-690), showed a bimodal activation/inactivation behavior indicating a high-affinity activating and low-affinity inactivating binding site. Two other peptides (p(681-690) and p(681-685)) that contained an RKRRK-motif and have previously been suggested in in vitro studies to be important for skeletal-type E-C coupling, failed to specifically stimulate skeletal CRCs. Noteworthy, p(671-690), p(681-690), and p(681-685) induced similar subconductances and long-lasting channel closings in skeletal and cardiac CRCs, indicating that these peptides interact in an isoform-independent manner with the CRCs.     

Structural determinants for activation or inhibition of ryanodine receptors by basic residues in the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop

The structures of peptide A, and six other 7-20 amino acid peptides corresponding to sequences in the A region (Thr671- Leu690) of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop have been examined, and are correlated with the ability of the peptides to activate or inhibit skeletal ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. The peptides adopted either random coil or nascent helix-like structures, which depended upon the polarity of the terminal residues as well as the presence and ionisation state of two glutamate residues. Enhanced activation of Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum, and activation of current flow through single ryanodine receptor channels (at -40 mV), was seen with peptides containing the basic residues 681Arg Lys Arg Arg Lys685, and was strongest when the residues were a part of an alpha-helix. Inhibition of channels (at +40 mV) was also seen with peptides containing the five positively charged residues, but was not enhanced in helical peptides. These results confirm the hypothesis that activation of ryanodine receptor channels by the II-III loop peptides requires both the basic residues and their participation in helical structure, and show for the first time that inhibition requires the basic residues, but is not structure-dependent. These findings imply that activation and inhibition result from peptide binding to separate sites on the ryanodine receptor.     

The II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor is responsible for the Bi-directional coupling with the ryanodine receptor.

The dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the skeletal muscle plasmalemma functions as both voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel and voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. As voltage sensor, the DHPR regulates intracellular Ca(2+) release via the skeletal isoform of the ryanodine receptor (RyR-1). Interaction with RyR-1 also feeds back to increase the Ca(2+) current mediated by the DHPR. To identify regions of the DHPR important for receiving this signal from RyR-1, we expressed in dysgenic myotubes a chimera (SkLC) having skeletal (Sk) DHPR sequence except for a cardiac (C) II-III loop (L). Tagging with green fluorescent protein (GFP) enabled identification of expressing myotubes. Dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-SkLC or SkLC lacked EC coupling and had very small Ca(2+) currents. Introducing a short skeletal segment (alpha(1S) residues 720-765) into the cardiac II-III loop (replacing alpha(1C) residues 851-896) of GFP-SkLC restored both EC coupling and Ca(2+) current densities like those of the wild type skeletal DHPR. This 46-amino acid stretch of skeletal sequence was recently shown to be capable of transferring strong, skeletal-type EC coupling to an otherwise cardiac DHPR (Nakai, J., Tanabe, T., Konno, T., Adams, B., and Beam, K.G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24983-24986). Thus, this segment of the skeletal II-III loop contains a motif required for both skeletal-type EC coupling and RyR-1-mediated enhancement of Ca(2+) current.     

Differential contribution of skeletal and cardiac II-III loop sequences to the assembly of dihydropyridine-receptor arrays in skeletal muscle

The plasmalemmal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) is the voltage sensor in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling. It activates calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via protein-protein interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR). To enable this interaction, DHPRs are arranged in arrays of tetrads opposite RyRs. In the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit, the cytoplasmic loop connecting repeats II and III is a major determinant of skeletal-type e-c coupling. Whether the essential II-III loop sequence (L720-L764) also determines the skeletal-specific arrangement of DHPRs was examined in dysgenic (alpha(1S)-null) myotubes reconstituted with distinct alpha(1) subunit isoforms and II-III loop chimeras. Parallel immunofluorescence and freeze-fracture analysis showed that alpha(1S) and chimeras containing L720-L764, all of which restored skeletal-type e-c coupling, displayed the skeletal arrangement of DHPRs in arrays of tetrads. Conversely, alpha(1C) and those chimeras with a cardiac II-III loop and cardiac e-c coupling properties were targeted into junctional membranes but failed to form tetrads. However, an alpha(1S)-based chimera with the heterologous Musca II-III loop produced tetrads but did not reconstitute skeletal muscle e-c coupling. These findings suggest an inhibitory role in tetrad formation of the cardiac II-III loop and that the organization of DHPRs in tetrads vis-a-vis the RyR is necessary but not sufficient for skeletal-type e-c coupling.     

Activation of ryanodine receptors by imperatoxin A and a peptide segment of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle is believed to be triggered by direct protein-protein interactions between the sarcolemmal dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca2+ channel and the Ca2+ release channel/ryanodine receptor (RyR) of sarcoplasmic reticulum. A 138-amino acid cytoplasmic loop between repeats II and III of the alpha1 subunit of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (the II-III loop) interacts with a region of the RyR to elicit Ca2+ release. In addition, small segments (10-20 amino acid residues) of the II-III loop retain the capacity to activate Ca2+ release. Imperatoxin A, a 33-amino acid peptide from the scorpion Pandinus imperator, binds directly to the RyR and displays structural and functional homology with an activating segment of the II-III loop (Glu666-Leu690). Mutations in a structural motif composed of a cluster of basic amino acids followed by Ser or Thr dramatically reduce or completely abolish the capacity of the peptides to activate RyRs. Thus, the Imperatoxin A-RyR interaction mimics critical molecular characteristics of the II-III loop-RyR interaction and may be a useful tool to elucidate the molecular mechanism that couples membrane depolarization to sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in vivo.     

A dihydropyridine receptor alpha1s loop region critical for skeletal muscle contraction is intrinsically unstructured and binds to a SPRY domain of the type 1 ryanodine receptor

The II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1s) subunit is a modulator of the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) Ca(2+) release channel in vitro and is essential for skeletal muscle contraction in vivo. Despite its importance, the structure of this loop has not been reported. We have investigated its structure using a suite of NMR techniques which revealed that the DHPR II-III loop is an intrinsically unstructured protein (IUP) and as such belongs to a burgeoning structural class of functionally important proteins. The loop does not possess a stable tertiary fold: it is highly flexible, with a strong N-terminal helix followed by nascent helical/turn elements and unstructured segments. Its residual structure is loosely globular with the N and C termini in close proximity. The unstructured nature of the II-III loop may allow it to easily modify its interaction with RyR1 following a surface action potential and thus initiate rapid Ca(2+) release and contraction. The in vitro binding partner for the II-III was investigated. The II-III loop interacts with the second of three structurally distinct SPRY domains in RyR1, whose function is unknown. This interaction occurs through two preformed N-terminal alpha-helical regions and a C-terminal hydrophobic element. The A peptide corresponding to the helical N-terminal region is a common probe of RyR function and binds to the same SPRY domain as the full II-III loop. Thus the second SPRY domain is an in vitro binding site for the II-III loop. The possible in vivo role of this region is discussed.     

Accessibility of targeted DHPR sites to streptavidin and functional effects of binding on EC coupling

In skeletal muscle, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane (PM) serves as a Ca(2+) channel and as the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC coupling), triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane. In addition to being functionally linked, these two proteins are also structurally linked to one another, but the identity of these links remains unknown. As an approach to address this issue, we have expressed DHPR alpha(1S) or beta(1a) subunits, with a biotin acceptor domain fused to targeted sites, in myotubes null for the corresponding, endogenous DHPR subunit. After saponin permeabilization, the approximately 60-kD streptavidin molecule had access to the beta(1a) N and C termini and to the alpha(1S) N terminus and proximal II-III loop (residues 671-686). Steptavidin also had access to these sites after injection into living myotubes. However, sites of the alpha(1S) C terminus were either inaccessible or conditionally accessible in saponin- permeabilized myotubes, suggesting that these C-terminal regions may exist in conformations that are occluded by other proteins in PM/SR junction (e.g., RyR1). The binding of injected streptavidin to the beta(1a) N or C terminus, or to the alpha(1S) N terminus, had no effect on electrically evoked contractions. By contrast, binding of streptavidin to the proximal alpha(1S) II-III loop abolished such contractions, without affecting agonist-induced Ca(2+) release via RyR1. Moreover, the block of EC coupling did not appear to result from global distortion of the DHPR and supports the hypothesis that conformational changes of the alpha(1S) II-III loop are necessary for EC coupling in skeletal muscle.     

FKBP12 Modulation of the Binding of the Skeletal Ryanodine Receptor onto the II-III Loop of the Dihydropyridine Receptor

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction coupling involves a functional interaction between the ryanodine receptor (RyR) and the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR). The domain corresponding to Thr⁶⁷¹-Leu⁶⁹⁰ of the II-III loop of the skeletal DHPR α₁-subunit is able to regulate RyR properties and calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum, whereas the domain corresponding to Glu⁷²⁴-Pro⁷⁶⁰ antagonizes this effect. Two peptides, covering these sequences (peptide A_Sk and C_Sk, respectively) were immobilized on polystyrene beads. We demonstrate that peptide A_Sk binds to the skeletal isoform of RyR (RyR1) whereas peptide C_Sk does not. Using surface plasmon resonance detection, we show that 1) domain Thr⁶⁷¹-Leu⁶⁹⁰ is the only sequence of the II-III loop binding with RyR1 and 2) the interaction of peptide A_Sk with RyR1 is not modulated by Ca²⁺ (pCa 9-2) nor by Mg²⁺ (up to 10 mM). In contrast, this interaction is strongly potentiated by the immunophilin FKBP12 (EC₅₀ = 10 nM) and inhibited by both rapamycin (IC₅₀ = 5 nM) and FK506. Peptide A_Sk induces a 300% increase of the opening probability of the RyR1 incorporated in lipid bilayer. Removal of FKBP12 from RyR1 completely abolishes this effect of domain A_Sk on RyR1 channel behavior. These results demonstrate a direct interaction of the RyR1 with the discrete domain of skeletal DHPR α₁-subunit corresponding to Thr⁶⁷¹-Leu⁶⁹⁰ and show that the association of FKBP12 with RyR1 specifically modulates this interaction.     

Cyclization of the intrinsically disordered α1S dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop enhances secondary structure and in vitro function

A key component of excitation contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle is the cytoplasmic linker (II-III loop) between the second and third transmembrane repeats of the α(1S) subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR). The II-III loop has been previously examined in vitro using a linear II-III loop with unrestrained N- and C-terminal ends. To better reproduce the loop structure in its native environment (tethered to the DHPR transmembrane domains), we have joined the N and C termini using intein-mediated technology. Circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy revealed a structural shift in the cyclized loop toward a protein with increased α-helical and β-strand structure in a region of the loop implicated in its in vitro function and also in a critical region for EC coupling. The affinity of binding of the II-III loop binding to the SPRY2 domain of the skeletal ryanodine receptor (RyR1) increased 4-fold, and its ability to activate RyR1 channels in lipid bilayers was enhanced 3-fold by cyclization. These functional changes were predicted consequences of the structural enhancement. We suggest that tethering the N and C termini stabilized secondary structural elements in the DHPR II-III loop and may reflect structural and dynamic characteristics of the loop that are inherent in EC coupling.     

Maurocalcine and domain A of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor Cav 1.1 subunit share common binding sites on the skeletal ryanodine receptor

Maurocalcine is a scorpion venom toxin of 33 residues that bears a striking resemblance to the domain A of the dihydropyridine voltage-dependent calcium channel type 1.1 (Cav1.1) subunit. This domain belongs to the II-III loop of Cav1.1, which is implicated in excitation-contraction coupling. Besides the structural homology, maurocalcine also modulates RyR1 channel activity in a manner akin to a synthetic peptide of domain A. Because of these similarities, we hypothesized that maurocalcine and domain A may bind onto an identical region(s) of RyR1. Using a set of RyR1 fragments, we demonstrate that peptide A and maurocalcine bind onto two discrete RyR1 regions: fragments 3 and 7 encompassing residues 1021-1631 and 3201-3661, respectively. The binding onto fragment 7 is of greater importance and was thus further investigated. We found that the amino acid region 3351-3507 of RyR1 (fragment 7.2) is sufficient for these interactions. Proof that peptide A and maurocalcine bind onto the same site is provided by competition experiments in which binding of fragment 7.2 to peptide A is inhibited by preincubation with maurocalcine. Moreover, when expressed in COS-7 cells, RyR1 carrying a deletion of fragment 7 shows a loss of interaction with both peptide A and maurocalcine. At the functional level, this deletion abolishes the maurocalcine induced stimulation of [3H]ryanodine binding onto microsomes of transfected COS-7 cells without affecting the caffeine and ATP responses.     

Changes in ryanodine receptor-mediated calcium release during skeletal muscle differentiation.

We have observed a disparity between the actions of caffeine and ryanodine, two agents known to affect the same site of intracellular calcium (Ca2+) release in muscle. The site of intracellular Ca2+ release, the ryanodine receptor (RyR), is established as the route of Ca2+ movement from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) to the cytosol during excitation-contraction coupling. We measured Ca2+ release fluorimetrically in both saponin-permeabilized and intact L6 cells, in response to known modulators (i.e., caffeine and ryanodine), during differentiation in vitro. The undifferentiated L6 cells showed little response to caffeine. However, a substantial caffeine-induced calcium release (caffCR) was evident by Day 3 of differentiation, and was nearly maximal by Day 7 of differentiation. By contrast, ryanodine failed to stimulate Ca2+ release until Day 4, lagging behind the caffeine response. Ryanodine-stimulated Ca2+ release was also maximal by Day 7. Higher concentrations of ryanodine, known to inhibit Ca2+ release, only began to affect caffCR at Day 4, indicating that cells were insensitive to both ryanodine stimulation and ryanodine inhibition prior to this time. Most of the results could be obtained both in permeabilized and intact cells. Using intact cells, we measured the time course of K+ -dependent (i.e., depolarization-induced) Ca2+ release. This time course matched caffeine and not ryanodine-induced Ca2+ release suggesting the action of caffeine was not due to Ca2+ release unrelated to excitation-contraction coupling. These findings suggest that ryanodine binding sites on the RyR may not be functional at early stages of muscle development, that ryanodine sensitivity is a poor indicator of Ca2+ flux through the RyR, or that other proteins are involved in Ca2+ release under certain circumstances.