Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair

Inheritance and maintenance of the DNA sequence and its organization into chromatin are central for eukaryotic life. To orchestrate DNA-replication and -repair processes in the context of chromatin is a challenge, both in terms of accessibility and maintenance of chromatin organization. To meet the challenge of maintenance, cells have evolved efficient nucleosome-assembly pathways and chromatin-maturation mechanisms that reproduce chromatin organization in the wake of DNA replication and repair. The aim of this Review is to describe how these pathways operate and to highlight how the epigenetic landscape may be stably maintained even in the face of dramatic changes in chromatin structure.     

Chromatin dynamics during DSB repair

We show that double strand breaks (DSBs) induced in chromatin of low as well as high density by exposure of human cells to gamma-rays are repaired in low-density chromatin. Extensive chromatin decondensation manifested in the vicinity of DSBs by decreased intensity of chromatin labelling, increased H4K5 acetylation, and decreased H3K9 dimethylation was observed already 15 min after irradiation. Only slight movement of sporadic DSB loci for short distances was noticed in living cells associated with chromatin decondensation around DSBs. This frequently resulted in their protrusion into the low-density chromatin domains. In these regions, the clustering (contact or fusion) of DSB foci was seen in vivo, and in situ after cell fixation. The majority of these clustered foci were repaired within 240 min, but some of them persisted in the nucleus for several days after irradiation, indicating damage that is not easily repaired. We propose that the repair of DSB in clustered foci might lead to misjoining of ends and, consequently, to exchange aberrations. On the other hand, the foci that persist for several days without being repaired could lead instead to cell death.     

Chromatin remodeling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Eukaryotic cells have developed conserved mechanisms to efficiently sense and repair DNA damage that results from constant chromosomal lesions. DNA repair has to proceed in the context of chromatin, and both histone-modifiers and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers have been implicated in this process. Here, we review the current understanding and new hypotheses on how different chromatin-modifying activities function in DNA repair in yeast and metazoan cells.     

Chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair

The removal of DNA damage from the eukaryotic genome requires DNA repair enzymes to operate within the complex environment of chromatin. We review the evidence for chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair and discuss the extent and possible molecular mechanisms of these rearrangements, focusing on events at the nucleosome level of chromatin structure.     

Dynamic properties of intermediate filaments: disassembly and reassembly during mitosis in baby hamster kidney cells

A morphological analysis of the organizational changes in the type III intermediate filament (IF) system in dividing baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells was carried out by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. The most dramatic change occurred during prometaphase, when the typical network of long 10-nm-diameter IF characteristic of interphase cells disassembled into aggregates containing short 4-6 nm filaments. During anaphase-telophase, arrays of short IF reappeared throughout the cytoplasm, and, in cytokinesis, the majority of IF were longer and concentrated in a juxtanuclear cap. These results demonstrate that the relatively stable IF cytoskeletal system of interphase cells is partitioned into daughter cells during mitosis by a process of disassembly and reassembly. This latter process occurs in a series of morphologically distinct steps at different stages of the mitotic process.     

Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise through both replication errors and from exogenous events such as exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs are potentially lethal, and cells have evolved a highly conserved mechanism to detect and repair these lesions. This mechanism involves phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) and the loading of DNA repair proteins onto the chromatin adjacent to the DSB. It is now clear that the chromatin architecture in the region surrounding the DSB has a critical impact on the ability of cells to mount an effective DNA damage response. DSBs promote the formation of open, relaxed chromatin domains which are spatially confined to the area surrounding the break. These relaxed chromatin structures are created through the coupled action of the p400 SWI/SNF ATPase and histone acetylation by the Tip60 acetyltransferase. The resulting destabilization of nucleosomes at the DSB by Tip60 and p400 is required for ubiquitination of the chromatin by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase, and for the subsequent recruitment of the brca1 complex. Chromatin dynamics at DSBs can therefore exert a powerful influence on the process of DSB repair. Further, there is emerging evidence that the different chromatin structures in the cell, such as heterochromatin and euchromatin, utilize distinct remodeling complexes and pathways to facilitate DSB. The processing and repair of DSB is therefore critically influenced by the nuclear architecture in which the lesion arises.Key words: p400, chromatin remodeling, DNA repair, NuA4, H2AX, acetylation, nucleosome, tip60Damage to cellular DNA can occur through multiple pathways, including exposure to genotoxic agents, the production of endogenous reactive oxygen species or errors which arise during DNA replication. To combat this continuous assault on the genome, mammalian cells have evolved multiple DNA repair pathways. The most challenging lesions to repair are DSBs, which physically cleave the DNA strand. DSBs can occur through exposure to IR, the collapse of replication forks or during the processing of certain types of DNA damage. Over the last 20 years, a clear picture of how the cell detects and repairs DSBs has emerged.^1,2 The earliest event in the cell''s response to DSBs is the rapid recruitment of the ATM kinase, followed by the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (termed γH2AX) on large chromatin domains which extend for 100''s of kilobases on either side of the DSB.³ The mdc1 scaffold protein is then recruited to γH2AX,⁴ providing a docking platform for the recruitment and retention of additional DNA repair proteins, including the MRN complex, the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase and the brca1 and 53BP1 proteins, onto the chromatin at DSBs.^5–7 Eventually, this spreading of DNA repair proteins along the chromatin from the DSB leads to the formation of IRIF, which can be visualized by immunofluorescent techniques. DSBs are then repaired by NHEJ, in which broken DNA ends are directly religated, or by HR, using the undamaged sister chromatid (present during S-phase) as a template. A defining characteristic of DSB repair is the dominant role that chromatin structure plays in the detection and repair of these lesions. In this review, we will examine recent work exploring how remodeling of the chromatin structure adjacent to DSBs plays a key role in the repair of DSBs.     

pH-dependent structures of ferritin and apoferritin in solution: disassembly and reassembly

The pH-dependent structures of the ferritin shell (apoferritin, 24-mer) and the ferrihydrite core, under physiological conditions that permit enzymatic activity, were investigated by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The solution structure of apoferritin was found to be nearly identical to the crystal structure. The shell thickness and hollow core volumes were estimated. The intact hollow spherical apoferritin was stable over a wide pH range, 3.40-10.0, and the ferrihydrite core was stable over the pH range 2.10-10.0. The apoferritin subunits underwent aggregation below pH 0.80, whereas the ferrihydrite cores aggregated below pH 2.10 as a result of the disassembly of the ferritin shell under the strongly acidic conditions. As the pH decreased from 3.40 to 0.80, apoferritin underwent stepwise disassembly by first forming a hollow sphere with two holes, then a headset-shaped structure, and, finally, rodlike oligomers. As the pH was increased from pH 1.96, the disassembled rodlike oligomers recovered only to the headset-shaped structure, and the disassembled headset-shaped intermediates recovered only to the hollow spherical structure with two hole defects. The apoferritin hole defects that formed during the disassembly process did not heal as the pH was increased to neutral or slightly basic conditions. The pH-induced apoferritin disassembly and reassembly processes were not fully reversible, although they were pseudoreversible over a limited pH range, between 10.0 and 2.66.     

Inhibition by hyperthermia of repair synthesis and chromatin reassembly of ultraviolet-induced damage to DNA

We have investigated the effects of hyperthermia treatment on sequential steps of the repair of UV-induced DNA damage in HeLa cells. DNA repair synthesis was inhibited by 40% after 15 min of hyperthermia treatment at 45 degrees C; greater inhibition of repair synthesis occurred with prolonged incubation at 45 degrees C. Enzymatic digestion of repair-labeled DNA with Exonuclease III indicated that once DNA repair was initiated, the DNA repair patch was synthesized to completion and that ligation of the DNA repair patch occurred. Thus the observed inhibition of UV-induced DNA repair synthesis by hyperthermia treatment may be the result of inhibition of enzymes involved in the initiating step(s) of DNA repair. DNA repair patches synthesized in UV-irradiated cells labeled at 37 degrees C with [3H]Thd were 2.2-fold more sensitive to micrococcal nuclease digestion than was parental DNA; if the length of the labeling period was prolonged, the nuclease sensitivity of the repair patch synthesized approached that of the parental DNA. DNA repair patches synthesized at 45 degrees C, however, remained sensitive to micrococcal nuclease digestion even after long labeling periods, indicating that heat treatment inhibits the reassembly of the DNA repair patch into nucleosomal structures.     

Influence of buffer ions and divalent cations on coated vesicle disassembly and reassembly

Disruption of the coat of coated vesicles is accompanied by the release of clathrin and other proteins in soluble form. The ability of solubilized coated vesicle proteins to reassemble into empty coats is influenced by Mg²⁺, Tris ion concentration, pH, and ionic strength. The proteins solubilized by 2 M urea spontaneously reassemble into empty coats following dialysis into isolation buffer (0.1 M MES–1 mM EGTA–1 mM MgCl₂–0.02% NaN₃, pH 6.8). Such reassembled coats have sedimentation properties similar to untreated coated vesicles. Clathrin is the predominant protein of reassembled coats; most of the other proteins present in native coated vesicles are absent. We have found that Mg²⁺ is important in the coat assembly reaction. At pH 8 in 0.01 M or 0.1 M Tris, coats dissociate; however, 10 mM MgCl₂ prevents dissociation. If the coats are first dissociated at pH 8 and then the MgCl₂ raised to 10 mM, reassembly occurs. These results suggest that Mg²⁺ stabilizes the coat lattice and promotes reassembly. This hypothesis is supported by our observations that increasing Mg²⁺ (10 μM–10 mM) increases reassembly whereas chelation of Mg²⁺ by (EGTA) inhibits reassembly. Coats reassembled in low-Tris (0.01 M, pH 8) supernatants containing 10 mM MgCl₂ do not sediment, but upon dialysis into isolation buffer (pH 6.8), these coats become sedimentable. Nonsedimentable coats are noted also either when partially purified clathrin (peak I from Sepharose CL4B columns) is dialyzed into low-ionic-strength buffer or when peaks I and II are dialyzed into isolation buffer. Such nonsedimentable coats may represent intermediates in the assembly reaction which have normal morphology but lack some of the physical properties of native coats. We present a model suggesting that tightly intertwined antiparallel clathrin dimers form the edges of the coat lattice.     

Chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis: a possible role for the transition proteins in DNA strand break repair

An important chromatin remodeling process is taking place during spermiogenesis in mammals and DNA strand breaks must be produced to allow the accompanying change in DNA topology. Endogenous DNA strand breaks are indeed detected at mid-spermiogenesis steps but are no longer present in mature sperm. Both in vitro and in vivo evidence suggests that the DNA-binding and condensing activities of a set of basic nuclear "transition proteins" may be crucial to the integrity of the chromatin remodeling process. We propose that these proteins are necessary for the repair of the strand breaks so that DNA fragmentation is minimized in the mature sperm.