The impact of new emerging drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma: is there still a role for PBSC transplantation?

High-dose therapy with the rescue of autologous stem cells represents today the standard approach for multiple myeloma patients aged <65 years. Several studies, in fact, have demonstrated the superiority of high-dose therapy with respect to conventional chemotherapy in younger patients. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) provide a rapid and effective hematopoietic recovery after the administration of supra maximal chemotherapy and mainly for this reason have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation. Recently, however, a number of new drugs have appeared in the armamentarium of the hematologist. Among these, thalidomide has been the first antiangiogenetic drug effectively adopted firstly in refractory-relapsed patients and now also as first line treatment with better results respect to VAD or VAD-like regimens. Inhibitors of proteasome, such as bortezomib, and other immunomodulatory agents, such as lenalidomide, have been also studied more recently in myeloma patients. In particular, bortezomib has shown to be very effective as single agent or in combination with high-dose dexamethasone. In this review, we try to define the potential role of these new drugs, how and when they can be included in the therapeutic program designed for younger and older patients, and mostly if and how these new agents could jeopardize the central role of autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma.     

Tumor necrosis factor is a survival and proliferation factor for human myeloma cells

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a major survival factor for malignant plasma cells. In patients with multiple myeloma (MM), cell lines whose survival and proliferation are dependent upon addition of exogenous IL-6 have been obtained. We show here that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is also a survival factor for myeloma cell lines, although less potent than IL-6. The survival activity of TNF-alpha is not affected by anti-IL-6 or anti-gp130 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). TNF-alpha also induces myeloma cells in the cell cycle and promotes the long-term growth of malignant plasma cell lines. As TNF-alpha is produced in patients with MM and associated with a poor prognosis, these results suggest that anti-TNF-alpha therapies could be useful in this disease.     

Do treatment protocols improve end results? A study of survival of patients with multiple myeloma in Finland.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether patients with multiple myeloma treated in three consecutive clinical trials of chemotherapy of the Finnish Leukaemia Group during 1979-85 had a more favourable prognosis than both patients treated in the trial area before the trials and those treated in the rest of Finland. DESIGN--Comparison of the time trend in survival of patients living in the trial area with that of patients living in the rest of Finland. SETTING--Trial area covered 17 of the 21 main hospital districts in Finland (serving more than two thirds of patients with multiple myeloma). PATIENTS--663 Men and 690 women in the trial area and 318 men and 307 women in the reference area aged under 71 in whom multiple myeloma was diagnosed during 1959-85. In the trial area the disease was diagnosed in 455 men and 493 women in 1959-78 and in 208 men and 197 women in 1979-85; in the reference area it was diagnosed in 234 men and 227 women in 1959-78 and in 84 men and 80 women in 1979-85. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Five year cumulative relative survival rates during 1959-85, annual relative survival rates in the first seven years of follow up during 1979-85, and fitted annual relative survival rates in the first five years of follow up during 1959-85. RESULTS--During the first two years of follow up the annual relative survival rates did not differ between the two areas, but in the next five years of follow up patients in the trial area did better than those in the reference area. For cases diagnosed in 1979-85 the difference in the five year cumulative relative survival rates between patients in the trial area and those in the reference area was 10%, those in the trial area doing better. Generalised proportional hazards regression analysis of the first five years of follow up showed that the patients in the trial area had a survival advantage over those in the reference area. The model with the best fit included year of follow up, time of diagnosis, the joint effect of year of follow up and time of diagnosis, and the joint effect of area and time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION--The patients in the trial area benefited from the clinical trials, which suggests that the use of a treatment protocol improves the end results of treatment. In other words, the results favour a systematic treatment schedule in preference to a schedule determined by the free choice of a clinician.     

Management of multiple myeloma

There has been no improvement in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) during the last decades and two meta-analyses of randomized trials recorded no significant survival benefit for combination chemotherapy compared to the classic melphalan-prednisone combination. However the past 15 years has seen several innovative strategies which have dramatically modified the management of MM. In younger patients, high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation is considered to be superior to conventional chemotherapy and is used as part of front-line therapy. A number of issues have been addressed in recent trials in order to improve the results of autologous transplantation (source of stem cells, conditioning regimen, impact of double transplants, maintenance therapy). Bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events and improve the quality of life. Recombinant erythropoietin reduces red blood cell transfusion need and improves the quality of life. Thalidomide has been introduced more recently. Phase II studies with thalidomide alone or combined with dexamethasone have shown impressive response rates and this drug is currently being evaluated as part of front-line therapy. Finally, analysis of prognostic factors such as beta 2 microglobulin and cytogenetics define subgroups of patients with a completely different outcome and help the process of selecting therapeutics strategies.     

Preclinical evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in cancer therapy

Bortezomib is a highly selective, reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome that is indicated for single-agent use in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior therapies and are progressing on their most recent therapy. Clinical investigations have been completed or are under way to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in multiple myeloma, both at relapse and presentation, as well as in other cancer types. The antiproliferative, proapoptotic, antiangiogenic, and antitumor activities of bortezomib result from proteasome inhibition and depend on the altered degradation of a host of regulatory proteins. Exposure to bortezomib has been shown to stabilize p21, p27, and p53, as well as the proapoptotic Bid and Bax proteins, caveolin-1, and inhibitor κB-α, which prevents activation of nuclear factor κB-induced cell survival pathways. Bortezomib also promoted the activation of the proapoptotic c-Jun-NH₂ terminal kinase, as well as the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. The anticancer effects of bortezomib as a single agent have been demonstrated in xenograft models of multiple myeloma, adult T-cell leukemia, lung, breast, prostate, pancreatic, head and neck, and colon cancer, and in melanoma. In these preclinical in vivo studies, bortezomib treatment resulted in decreased tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis, as well as increased survival and tumor apoptosis. In several in vitro and/or in vivo cancer models, bortezomib has also been shown to enhance the antitumor properties of several antineoplastic treatments. Importantly, bortezomib was generally well tolerated and did not appear to produce additive toxicities when combined with other therapies in the dosing regimens used in these preclinical in vivo investigations. These findings provide a rationale for further clinical trials using bortezomib alone or in combination regimens with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or novel agents in patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors.     

Multidrug resistance (MDR) genes in haematological malignancies

The emergence of drug resistant cells is one of the main obstacles for successful chemotherapeutic treatment of haematological malignancies. Most patients initially respond to chemotherapy at the time of first clinical admission, but often relapse and become refractory to further treatment not only to the drugs used in the first treatment but also to a variety of other drugs. Laboratory investigations have now provided a cellular basis for this clinical observation of multidrug resistance (MDR). Expression of a glycoprotein (referred to as P-glycoprotein) in the membrane of cells made resistantin vitro to naturally occurring anticancer agents like anthracyclines, Vinca alkaloids and epipodophyllotoxins, has been shown to be responsible for the so-called classical MDR phenotype. P-glycoprotein functions as an ATP-dependent, unidirectional drug efflux pump with a broad substrate specificity, that effectively maintains the intracellular cytotoxic drug concentrations under a non-cytotoxic threshold value. Extensive clinical studies have shown that P-glycoprotein is expressed on virtually all types of haematological malignancies, including acute and chronic leukaemias, multiple myelomas and malignant lymphomas. Since in model systems for P-glycoprotein-mediated MDR, drug resistance may be circumvented by the addition of non-cytotoxic agents that can inhibit the outward drug pump, clinical trials have been initiated to determine if such an approach will be feasible in a clinical situation. Preliminary results suggest that some haematological malignancies, among which are acute myelocytic leukaemia, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, might benefit from the simultaneous administration of cytotoxic drugs and P-glycoprotein inhibitors. However, randomised clinical trials are needed to evaluate the use of such resistance modifiers in the clinic.Abbreviations ALL acute lymphocytic leukaemia - AML acute myelocytic leukaemia - BM bone marrow - CAT chloramphenicol acetyltransferase - CLL chronic lymphocytic leukaemia - CML chronic myelocytic leukaemia - CR complete remission - HCL hairy cell leukaemia - MDR multidrug resistance - MDS myelodysplastic syndrome - MM multiple myeloma - MoAb monoclonal antibody - NHL non-Hodgkin's lymphoma - PB peripheral blood - PCR polymerase chain reaction - PLL prolymphocytic leukaemia - RMA resistance modifying agent - VAD vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone     

Multiple myeloma/hypercalcemia

Multiple myeloma, a cancer of plasma cells, is associated with excessive tumor-induced, osteoclast-mediated bone destruction. Hypercalcemia remains the most frequent metabolic complication of myeloma in patients, and excessive osteolysis plays a major contributory role in its pathogenesis. The clinical presentation of hypercalcemia in patients varies depending on the level of ionized calcium; it can be life threatening, as in the case of hypercalcemic crisis, requiring immediate medical treatment to prevent death. During the past few years there have been exciting developments in our understanding of the pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease; in particular, key mediators of the osteoclastic bone resorption in myeloma have been identified, including receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha. There is also increasing evidence that Dickkopf 1, which has been shown to be over-expressed in myeloma patients, is also a potent stimulator of osteoclast formation and activity. Importantly, the available data suggest that RANKL is the final common mediator of osteoclastic bone resorption, irrespective of the upstream initiator molecule. This brief review presents an overview of the roles played by these mediators in inducing osteolysis in myeloma bone disease, and it discusses targeting RANKL as a potential new treatment strategy in myeloma bone disease and myeloma-associated hypercalcemia.     

PAD方案治疗75例初诊多发性骨髓瘤疗效观察

目的:PAD方案已成为目前多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗的一线方案,国内外就其疗效和不良反应发生均有报道,本实验旨在观察并探讨PAD方案治疗我中心初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效和不良反应,为临床工作提供参考。方法:我科75例初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者给予PAD方案4-6疗程,评估疗效及不良反应。结果:75例患者接受PAD方案化疗,四疗程后总有效率(CR+VGPR+PR)为73.3%,其中CR 5例,占6.7%,VGPR 12例,占16%,PR 38例,占50.7%;无效例数为20例,占26.7%,其中SD 17例,占22.7%,PD 3例,占4%;1年总生存率为75%,2年总生存率为62.7%。血液学不良反应有白细胞降低34例(45.3%),血小板降低10例(13.3%);非血液学不良反应有周围神经系统症状25例(33.3%),疱疹病毒感染7例(9.3%),消化系统症状15例(20%),乏力14例(18.7%),呼吸系统症状29例(38.7%),激素相关症状3例(4%)。绝大部分患者可以耐受且完成相应化疗疗程。结论:我中心PAD方案疗效令人满意,不良反应可耐受,同国内外报道的疗效反应率相近,不良反应发生率更低,是治疗多发性骨髓瘤的首选方案。     

The Use of Novel Drugs Can Effectively Improve Response,Delay Relapse and Enhance Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Renal Impairment

Background

Renal impairment is a common feature in multiple myeloma and is considered a poor prognostic factor.

Aim

To determine the impact of novel drugs (i.e. bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide) in the treatment of myeloma patients with renal impairment. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints were time to next treatment and response.

Methods

The study population included all patients diagnosed with treatment-demanding multiple myeloma January 2000 to June 2011 at 15 Swedish hospitals. Renal impairment was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate under 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

Result

The study population consisted of 1538 patients, of which 680 had renal impairment at diagnosis. The median overall survival in patients with renal impairment was 33 months, which was significantly shorter than 52 months in patients with normal renal function (P<0.001). Novel agents in first line improved overall survival (median 60 months) in non-high-dose treated patients with renal impairment (n = 143) as compared to those treated with conventional cytotoxic drugs (n = 411) (median 27 months) (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis up front treatment with bortezomib was an independent factor for better overall survival in non-high-dose treated renally impaired patients. High-dose treated renally impaired patients had significantly better median overall survival than non-high-dose ones (74 versus 26 months) and novel drugs did not significantly improve survival further in these patients. Patients with renal impairment had both a shorter median time to next treatment and a lower response rate than those with normal renal function. However, novel drugs and high dose treatment lead to a significantly longer time to next treatment and the use of novel agents significantly improved the response rate of these patients.

Conclusion

High dose treatment and novel drugs, especially bortezomib, can effectively overcome the negative impact of renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma.     

Fundamental research leading to improved endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Whilst endocrine therapy has a long-established role in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer, current therapies produce remission in, at best, only between 30 and 40% of cases. The most efficient use of hormonal measures therefore requires the accurate identification of individuals with hormone-responsive tumours. Oestrogen receptor measurements are useful but not fully discriminatory and additional predictive factors are required. Markers, such as specific hormonally induced proteins and mRNA, and antagonistic systems, such as epidermal growth factor receptors and cyclic AMP binding proteins are currently being evaluated. In terms of therapy, surgical manoeuvres such as adrenalectomy and hypophysectomy have already been replaced by the medical administration of anti-oestrogens, progestogens and drug regimes such as aminoglutethimide-hydrocortisone. Although castration by surgery or radiation remains the first-line treatment in premenopausal women with advanced disease, the advent of depot preparations of LHRH agonists offers the opportunity of performing medical ovariectomies which have the added advantage of being reversible. As a result of laboratory studies, more potent anti-oestrogens and more specific "suicide" aromatase inhibitors are entering into clinical practice. These can be expected to increase efficacy of treatment whilst reducing its side-effects. Research using cell-lines of human breast cancer also suggests that anti-progestins and agents capable of antagonizing steroid-induced growth factors will inhibit tumour growth. Such novel therapies potentially could make a major impact in the endocrine management of breast cancer. Lastly, although the primary management of early breast cancer predominantly involves non-hormonal modalities, clinical trials are now providing evidence of survival benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. The knowledge accrued from the use of newer endocrine agents in advanced cancer could therefore ultimately be relevant to the treatment of earlier stages of the disease.     

The power of proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are therapeutic backbones of multiple myeloma treatment, with PI-based therapies being standards of care throughout the treatment algorithm. Proteasome inhibition affects multiple critical signaling pathways in myeloma cells and interacts synergistically with mechanisms of action of other conventional and novel agents, resulting in substantial anti-myeloma activity and at least additive effects.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the biologic effects of proteasome inhibition in myeloma and provides an overview of the importance of proteasome inhibition to the current treatment algorithm. It reviews key clinical data on three PIs, specifically bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib; assesses ongoing phase 3 trials with these agents; and looks ahead to the increasingly broad role of both approved PIs and PIs under investigation in the frontline and relapsed settings.

Expert commentary: Progress to date with PIs in multiple myeloma has been impressive, but there remain unmet needs and challenges, as well as increasing opportunities to optimize the use of these agents. Understanding discrepancies between PIs in terms of efficacy and safety profile is a key goal of ongoing research, along with proteomics-based efforts to identify potential biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance, thereby enabling increasingly personalized treatment approaches in the future.     

Overcoming inherent resistance to histone deacetylase inhibitors in multiple myeloma cells by targeting pathways integral to the actin cytoskeleton

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are novel chemotherapeutics undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for the potential treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although HDACi have demonstrable synergy when combined with proteasome inhibitors (PIs), recent evidence indicates that combination of HDACi and PI is beneficial only in a subset of patients with advanced MM, clearly indicating that other rational combinations should be explored. In this context we hypothesized that understanding the molecular signature associated with inherent resistance to HDACi would provide a basis for the identification of therapeutic combinations with improved clinical efficacy. Using human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) categorized as sensitive, intermediate or resistant to HDACi, gene expression profiling (GEP) and gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed to determine if a genetic signature associated with inherent resistance to HDACi-resistance could be identified. Correlation of GEP to increasing or decreasing sensitivity to HDACi indicated a unique 35-gene signature that was significantly enriched for two pathways – regulation of actin cytoskeleton and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum. When HMCL and primary MM samples were treated with a combination of HDACi and agents targeting the signaling pathways integral to the actin cytoskeleton, synergistic cell death was observed in all instances, thus providing a rationale for combining these agents with HDACi for the treatment of MM to overcome resistance. This report validates a molecular approach for the identification of HDACi partner drugs and provides an experimental framework for the identification of novel therapeutic combinations for anti-MM treatment.     

Impact of bone events on survival in solitary bone plasmacytoma

BackgroundAlthough much studied in multiple myeloma, bone events (BE) can also cause important morbidity in bone plasmacytoma patients. To our knowledge, the effect of BE on overall survival (OS) and progression to multiple myeloma free-survival (MPFS) also has never been studied.Patients and MethodsFifty-nine patients treated from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively assessed. All patients had histological proof of disease and were treated with radical radiotherapy (RT). Available clinical information for at least 6 months follow-up or until death had to be available. BE were described as one of the following events in the index bone: fractures, osteomyelitis, chronic pain, surgery or loss of limb function after RT.ResultsMean age at diagnosis was 57.3 years (18–80); most male (67.8%). Mean OS, bone event free-survival (BEFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and MPFS were 41, 36, 37 and 19 months, respectively. There were 15 deaths. BEFS (p = 0.008) and age>55y (p = 0.044) were associated with MPFS. Only BEFS correlated with OS (p = 0.029). BE was independently associated with both MPFS and OS in multivariate analysis.ConclusionBE and survival end-points were correlated. BE should be investigated in prospective trials.     

Advances in the treatment of extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma

Extramedullary disease (EMD) is characterized by plasma cells outside of bone marrow in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, which results in an adverse prognosis. The cornerstone of treatment consists of combination therapy including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, steroids, followed by consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. This review summarized the recent advances in the treatment of EMD. Bortezomib based therapy showed efficacy and was recommended to treat EMD. Marizomib had advantages in the treatment of central nervous system-multiple myeloma (CNS-MM) because of its good central nervous system penetrability. Immunomodulatory drugs such as lenalidomide and pomalidomide have been reported to be effective. Isatuximab and selinexor were also active. Based on the treatment experience of EMD in our department, we summarized treatment approach for EMD. However, the benefits of patients with EMD from the new era of novel drugs were limited. Novel drugs combination, monoclonal antibody, molecular targeted therapy, cellular immunotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are under investigation. Therapeutic studies and clinical trials specifically target EMD should be conducted. Hopefully, these treatment options for EMD will be demonstrated efficacy in the future.     

Platelet-rich plasma improves wound healing in multiple myeloma bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw patients

Bisphosphonates are drugs used to treat various metabolic and malignant bone diseases. In the past 10 years intravenous bisphosphonates have been associated with increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The aim of the present study is to evaluate platelet-rich plasma (PRP) wound healing benefits in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who developed ONJ after surgical tooth extraction. The study included 7 patients, 2 males and 5 females. All individuals had been taking zoledronate or pamidronate followed by zoledronate for an average of 5 years. Four subjects had only standard surgical debridement and sequestrectomy to treat the ONJ and three had additional autologous PRP. The patients were followed-up for 3 months. The use of PRP to enhance wound healing and reduce bone exposure seems to be a good treatment protocol in ONJ MM subjects.     

Twenty-Seven Years of Phase III Trials for Patients with Extensive Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Disappointing Results

Background

Few studies have formally assessed whether treatment outcomes have improved substantially over the years for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) enrolled in phase III trials. The objective of the current investigation was to determine the time trends in outcomes for the patients in those trials.

Methods and Findings

We searched for trials that were reported between January 1981 and August 2008. Phase III randomized controlled trials were eligible if they compared first-line, systemic chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. Data were evaluated by using a linear regression analysis. Results: In total, 52 trials were identified that had been initiated between 1980 and 2006; these studies involved 10,262 patients with 110 chemotherapy arms. The number of randomized patients and the proportion of patients with good performance status (PS) increased over time. Cisplatin-based regimens, especially cisplatin and etoposide (PE) regimen, have increasingly been studied, whereas cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine–based regimens have been less investigated. Multiple regression analysis showed no significant improvement in survival over the years. Additionally, the use of a PE regimen did not affect survival, whereas the proportion of patients with good PS and the trial design of assigning prophylactic cranial irradiation were significantly associated with favorable outcome.

Conclusions and Significance

The survival of patients with ED-SCLC enrolled in phase III trials did not improve significantly over the years, suggesting the need for further development of novel targets, newer agents, and comprehensive patient care.     

Dose-intensive chemotherapy with stem cell support as a treatment strategy for bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

Whether high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support improves the long-term outcome for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma is debatable and controversial. Prognosis of patients with unresectable or advanced metastatic sarcoma remains poor with a disease-free survival at 5 years less than 10%; treatment is generally considered to be palliative. Doxorubicin, epirubicin and ifosfamide are the most active single agents with response rates above 20%. Although drug combinations result in higher response rates, superiority against single agent chemotherapy in terms of survival could not have been demonstrated yet. As a dose-response relationship has been shown for the anthracyclines and especially for ifosfamide, high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support has been evaluated by several investigators. However, all studies were not randomized, comprised small patient numbers and included heterogeneous histological subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas. Nevertheless, higher doses of chemotherapy result in higher remission rates, which could correlate with longer survival. Well-designed randomized trials should be performed. In this review article, we overview the literature and on the basis of our own data we emphasize the value of high-dose chemotherapy as a treatment option for younger patients with a good performance status in complete or partial remission prior to high-dose chemotherapy.     

Angiosuppression and chemotherapy: strategies aimed at their integration in cancer patients

A number of antiangiogenic agents have been developed as pharmaceuticals and are currently being tested in clinical studies. Potential strategies to enhance the activity of angiogenesis inhibitors could be to combine them, or better still, to administer them either sequentially or concurrently with cytotoxic drugs. Chemotherapy would be a more appropriate initial choice for patients with advanced disease since cytostatic agents can induce a fast regression of the tumor and cancer-related symptoms. Antiangiogenic treatment could be used after chemotherapy in patients who achieve disease remission to prolong the time to progression, the symptom-free interval and the overall survival. Antiangiogenic treatment is likely to attain an important role in the adjuvant setting. In fact, it could be used for prolonged periods after radical surgery to maintain dormancy of residual tumor cells. In spite of these promising preclinical data, several points need to be clarified before the initiation of clinical trials. In fact, certain misconceptions may interfere with their optimum design and result analysis.     

Design,synthesis, and biological evaluation of bone-targeted proteasome inhibitors for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable neoplasm characterized by devastating and progressive bone destruction. Standard chemotherapeutic agents have not been effective at significantly prolonging the survival of MM patients and these agents are typically associated with often severe, dose-limiting side effects. There is great need for methods to target the delivery of novel, effective cytotoxic agents specifically to bone, where myeloma cells reside. We have synthesized and evaluated the effects of the bone-targeted proteasome inhibitors PS-341-BP-1, PS-341-BP-2 and MG-262-BP on cell proliferation using the mouse 5TGM1 and human RPMI 8226 cell lines in vitro. The compounds exhibit strong cytotoxicity on MM cell lines and reduce the number of viable cells in a dose dependent manner.     

Novel biologically based therapeutic strategies in myeloma

Multiple myeloma remains incurable despite advances in conventional chemotherapy and wider applicability of high dose chemotherapy with single and/or tandem autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although a complete remission rate of 41% and an event-free survival of 43 months have been reported after tandem transplantation, it is highly unlikely that further improvements in the outcome of multiple myeloma will be achieved by escalating cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. Novel biologically based therapies are therefore urgently required. Targeted therapeutic approaches based on: identification of genetic abnormalities in malignant plasma cells; interrupting growth of myeloma cells; triggering apoptotic signaling cascades in tumor cells; modulating growth and survival of multiple myeloma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, i.e. angiogenesis and cytokine networks; enhancing allogeneic and autologous antimyeloma immunity; and characterizing newer myeloma antigens for serotherapy are under development. These therapies offer great promise, used alone/or in combination with conventional treatment approaches, to improve the outcome in this disease in newly diagnosed/refractory or relapsed patients with multiple myeloma.