Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of the Nucleic Acid-Binding Domain of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 3

The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of a globular domain of residues 1071 to 1178 within the previously annotated nucleic acid-binding region (NAB) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein 3 (nsp3) has been determined, and N- and C-terminally adjoining polypeptide segments of 37 and 25 residues, respectively, have been shown to form flexibly extended linkers to the preceding globular domain and to the following, as yet uncharacterized domain. This extension of the structural coverage of nsp3 was obtained from NMR studies with an nsp3 construct comprising residues 1066 to 1181 [nsp3(1066-1181)] and the constructs nsp3(1066-1203) and nsp3(1035-1181). A search of the protein structure database indicates that the globular domain of the NAB represents a new fold, with a parallel four-strand β-sheet holding two α-helices of three and four turns that are oriented antiparallel to the β-strands. Two antiparallel two-strand β-sheets and two 3₁₀-helices are anchored against the surface of this barrel-like molecular core. Chemical shift changes upon the addition of single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) identified a group of residues that form a positively charged patch on the protein surface as the binding site responsible for the previously reported affinity for nucleic acids. This binding site is similar to the ssRNA-binding site of the sterile alpha motif domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vts1p protein, although the two proteins do not share a common globular fold.The coronavirus replication cycle begins with the translation of the 29-kb positive-strand genomic RNA to produce two large polyprotein species (pp1a and pp1ab), which are subsequently cleaved to produce 15 or possibly 16 nonstructural proteins (nsp''s) (11). Among these, nsp3 is the largest nsp and also the largest coronavirus protein. nsp3 is a glycosylated (16, 22), multidomain (36, 51), integral membrane protein (38). All known coronaviruses encode a homologue of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nsp3, and sequence analysis suggests that at least some functions of nsp3 may be found in all members of the order Nidovirales (11). Hallmarks of the coronavirus nsp3 proteins include one or two papain-like proteinase domains (3, 12, 16, 31, 56, 62), one to three histone H2A-like macrodomains which may bind RNA or RNA-like substrates (5, 9, 48, 54, 55), and a carboxyl-terminal Y domain of unknown function (13). An extensive bioinformatics analysis of the coronavirus replicase proteins by Snijder et al. (51) provided detailed annotations of the then-recently sequenced SARS-CoV genome (35, 47), including the identification of a domain unique to SARS-CoV and the prediction of the ADP-ribose-1″-phosphatase (ADRP) activity of the X domain (since shown to be one of the macrodomains).Only limited information is so far available regarding the ways in which the functions of nsp3 are involved in the coronavirus replication cycle. Some functions of nsp3 appear to be directed toward protein; e.g., the nsp3 proteinase domain cleaves the amino-terminal two or three nsp''s from the polyprotein and has deubiquitinating activity (4, 6, 14, 30, 53, 60). Most homologues of the most conserved macrodomain of nsp3 appear to possess ADRP activity (9, 34, 41-43, 48, 59) and may act on protein-conjugated poly(ADP-ribose); however, this function appears to be dispensable for replication (10, 42) and may not be conserved in all coronaviruses (41). The potential involvement of nsp3 in RNA replication is suggested by the presence of several RNA-binding domains (5, 36, 49, 54, 55). nsp3 has been identified in convoluted membrane structures that are also associated with other replicase proteins and that have been shown to be involved in viral RNA synthesis (16, 24, 52), and nsp3 papain-like proteinase activity is essential for replication (14, 62). Other conserved structural features of nsp3 include two ubiquitin-like domains (UB1 and UB2) (45, 49). We have also recently reported that nsp3 is a structural protein, since it was identified as a minor component of purified SARS-CoV preparations, although it is not known whether nsp3 is directly involved in virogenesis or is incidentally incorporated due to protein-protein or protein-RNA interactions (36).A nucleic acid-binding region (NAB) is located within the polypeptide segment of residues 1035 to 1203 of nsp3. The NAB is expected to be located in the cytoplasm, along with the papain-like protease, ADRP, a region unique to SARS-CoV (the SARS-CoV unique domain [SUD]), and nsp3a, since both the N and C termini of nsp3 were shown previously to be cytoplasmic (38). Two hydrophobic segments are membrane spanning (38), and the NAB is located roughly 200 residues in the N-terminal direction from the first membrane-spanning segment. This paper presents the next step in the structural coverage of nsp3, with the determination of the NAB structure. The structural studies included nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization of two constructs, an nsp3 construct comprising residues 1035 to 1181 [nsp3(1035-1181)] and nsp3(1066-1203), and complete NMR structure determination for the construct nsp3(1066-1181) (see Fig. ​Fig.8).8). The structural data were then used as a platform from which to investigate the nature of the previously reported single-stranded RNA (ssRNA)-binding activity of the NAB (36). Since no three-dimensional (3D) structures for the corresponding domains in other group II coronaviruses are known and since the SARS-CoV NAB has only very-low-level sequence identity to other proteins, such data could not readily be derived from comparisons with structurally and functionally characterized homologues.Open in a separate windowFIG. 8.Sequence alignment of the polypeptide segment nsp3(1066-1181) that forms the globular domain of the SARS-CoV NAB with homologues from other group II coronaviruses. Protein multiple-sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW2 and included sequences from SARS-CoV Tor2 (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAP41036","term_id":"30795144","term_text":"AAP41036"}}AAP41036) and representatives of three protein clusters corresponding to three group II coronavirus lineages identified by a BLAST search: bat coronavirus HKU5-5 (BtCoV-HKU5-5; accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABN10901","term_id":"124389468","term_text":"ABN10901"}}ABN10901), BtCoV-HKU9-1 (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"P0C6T6","term_id":"190360129","term_text":"P0C6T6"}}P0C6T6), and human coronavirus HKU1-N16 (HCoV-HKU1-N16; accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABD75496","term_id":"89515407","term_text":"ABD75496"}}ABD75496). Above the sequences, the positions in full-length SARS-CoV nsp3, the locations of the regular secondary structures in the presently solved NMR structure of the SARS-CoV NAB globular domain, and the residue numbering in this domain are indicated. Amino acids are colored according to conservation and biochemical properties, following ClustalW conventions. Residues implicated in interactions with ssRNA are marked with inverted black triangles. In the present context, the key features are that there is only one position with conservation of K or R (red) and that there are extended sequences with conservation of hydrophobic residues (blue) (see the text).     

Bovine Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 1 (p28) Is an RNA Binding Protein That Binds Terminal Genomic cis-Replication Elements

Nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a 28-kDa protein in the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and closely related mouse hepatitis coronavirus, is the first protein cleaved from the open reading frame 1 (ORF 1) polyprotein product of genome translation. Recently, a 30-nucleotide (nt) cis-replication stem-loop VI (SLVI) has been mapped at nt 101 to 130 within a 288-nt 5′-terminal segment of the 738-nt nsp1 cistron in a BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA. Since a similar nsp1 coding region appears in all characterized groups 1 and 2 coronavirus DI RNAs and must be translated in cis for BCoV DI RNA replication, we hypothesized that nsp1 might regulate ORF 1 expression by binding this intra-nsp1 cistronic element. Here, we (i) establish by mutation analysis that the 72-nt intracistronic SLV immediately upstream of SLVI is also a DI RNA cis-replication signal, (ii) show by gel shift and UV-cross-linking analyses that cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa, but not viral proteins, bind SLV and SLVI, (SLV-VI) and (iii) demonstrate by gel shift analysis that nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind three 5′ untranslated region (UTR)- and one 3′ UTR-located cis-replication SLs. Notably, nsp1 specifically binds SLIII and its flanking sequences in the 5′ UTR with ∼2.5 μM affinity. Additionally, under conditions enabling expression of nsp1 from DI RNA-encoded subgenomic mRNA, DI RNA levels were greatly reduced, but there was only a slight transient reduction in viral RNA levels. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function to regulate viral genome translation or replication but not by binding SLV-VI within its own coding region.Coronaviruses (CoVs) (59) cause primarily respiratory and gastroenteric diseases in birds and mammals (35, 71). In humans, they most commonly cause mild upper respiratory disease, but the recently discovered human CoVs (HCoVs), HCoV-NL63 (65), HCoV-HKU1 (73), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV (40) cause serious diseases in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. The SARS-CoV causes pneumonia with an accompanying high (∼10%) mortality rate (69). The ∼30-kb positive-strand CoV genome, the largest known among RNA viruses, is 5′ capped and 3′ polyadenylated and replicates in the cytoplasm (41). As with other characterized cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses (3), translation of the CoV genome is an early step in replication, and terminally located cis-acting RNA signals regulate translation and direct genome replication (41). How these happen mechanistically in CoVs is only beginning to be understood.In the highly studied group 2 mouse hepatitis coronavirus model (MHV A59 strain) and its close relative the bovine CoV (BCoV Mebus strain), five higher-order cis-replication signals have been identified in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). These include two in the 5′ UTR required for BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA replication (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) described as stem-loop III (SLIII) (50) and SLIV (51). Recently, the SLI region in BCoV (15) has been reanalyzed along with the homologous region in MHV and is now described as comprising SL1 and SL2 (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), of which SL2 has been shown to be a cis-replication structure in the context of the MHV genome (38). In the 3′ UTR, two higher-order cis-replication structures have been identified that function in both DI RNA and the MHV genome. These are a 5′-proximal bulged SL and adjacent pseudoknot that potentially act together as a unit (23, 27, 28, 72) and a 3′-proximal octamer-associated bulged SL (39, 76) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). In addition, the 5′-terminal 65-nucleotide (nt) leader and the 3′-terminal poly(A) tail have been shown to be cis-replication signals for BCoV DI RNA (15, 60).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.RNA structures in the BCoV genome tested for nsp1 binding. (A) BCoV 5′-terminal and 3′-terminal cis-acting RNA SL structures and flanking sequences identified for BCoV DI RNA replication. Regions of the genome are identified and SL cis-replication elements are identified schematically. Open boxes at nt 100 and 211 identify AUG start codons for the short upstream ORF and ORF 1, respectively. A closed box at nt 124 identifies the UAG stop codon for the short upstream ORF. Shown below the SL structures are the RNA segments used as ³²P-labeled probes in the gel shift assays. BSL-PK, bulged SL-pseudoknot; 8mer-BSL, octamer-associated bulged SL. (B) Gel shift assays for probes when used with purified nsp1. Protein-RNA complexes identifying a shifted probe are labeled C.In CoVs, the 5′-proximal open reading frame (ORF) of ∼20 kb (called ORF 1) comprising the 5′ two-thirds of the genome is translated to overlapping polyproteins of ∼500 and ∼700 kDa, named pp1a and pp1ab (41). pp1ab is formed by a −1 ribosomal frameshift event at the ORF1a-ORF1b junction during translation (41). pp1a and pp1ab are proteolytically processed into potentially 16 nonstructural protein (nsp) end products or partial end products that are proposed to function together as the replicase (24). ORF 1a encodes nsps 1 to 11 which include papain-like proteases (nsp3), a 3C-like main protease (nsp5), membrane-anchoring proteins (nsps 4 and 6), a potential primase (nsp8), and RNA-binding proteins (nsp 7/nsp 8 complex and nsps 9 and 10) of imprecisely understood function (19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 43, 49, 77). ORF 1b encodes nsps 12 to 16 which function as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a helicase, an exonuclease, an endonuclease, and a 2′-O-methyltransferase, respectively (6, 17, 24, 44). 3′ Proximal genomic ORFs encoding structural and accessory proteins are translated from a 3′-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs) (41).The N-terminal ORF 1a protein, nsp1, in the case of BCoV and MHV is also named p28 to identify the cleaved 28-kDa product (18). The precise role of nsp1 in virus replication has not been determined, but it is known that a sequence encoding an N-proximal nsp1 region in MHV (nt 255 to 369 in the 738-nt coding sequence) cannot be deleted from the genome without loss of productive infection (10). nsp1 also directly binds nsp7 and nsp10 (11) and by confocal microscopy is found associated with the membranous replication complex (10, 66) and virus assembly sites (11). The amino acid sequence of nsp1 is poorly conserved among CoVs, indicating that it may be a protein that interacts with cellular components (1, 58). In the absence of other viral proteins, MHV nsp1 induces general host mRNA degradation (79) and cell cycle arrest (16). The SARS-CoV nsp1 homolog, a 20-kDa protein, has been reported to cause mRNA degradation (30, 45), inhibition of host protein synthesis (30, 45, 70), inhibition of interferon signaling (70, 79), and cytokine dysregulation in lung cells (36).In this study, we examine the RNA-binding properties of BCoV nsp1 with the hypothesis that it is a potential regulator of translation or replication through its binding of SLVI mapping within its coding region. The rationale for this hypothesis stems from five observations. (i) In the BCoV DI RNA, the 5′-terminal one-third (approximately) of the nsp1 cistron and the entire nucleocapsid (N) protein cistron together comprise the single contiguous ORF in the DI RNA, and most of both coding regions appear required for DI RNA replication (15). (ii) The partial nsp1 cistron in the DI RNA must be translated in cis for DI RNA replication in helper virus-infected cells (12, 14). (iii) A similar part of the nsp1 cistron is found in the genome of all characterized naturally occurring group 1 and 2 CoV DI RNAs described to date (7, 8). (iv) A cis-acting SL named SLVI is found within the partial nsp1 cistron in the BCoV DI RNA (12). (v) Translation, which involves a 5′→3′ transit of ribosomes, and negative-strand synthesis, which involves a 3′→5′ transit of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, cannot simultaneously occur on the same molecule with a single ORF (4, 31). Thus, to enable genome replication an inhibition of translation at least early in infection for cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses is required (4, 5, 22, 32). Mechanisms of translation inhibition have been described for the Qβ viral genome, wherein the viral replicase autoregulates translation by binding an intracistronic cis-replication element (32), and for the polio virus genome, wherein genome circularization inhibits the early translation step (5, 22). Therefore, since nsp1 is synthesized early and also contains an intracistronic cis-replication element, we postulated that it is autoregulatory with RNA binding properties.Here, we do the following: (i) demonstrate by mutagenesis analysis that the 72-nt SLV, mapping immediately upstream of SLVI and within the partial nsp1 cistron, is also a cis-acting DI RNA replication element; (ii) show by gel shift and UV cross-linking analyses that there is likely no binding of an intracellular viral protein to SLV and SLVI (SLV-VI), but there is binding of unidentified cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa; and (iii) show by gel shift analysis that recombinant nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind SLs I to IV in the 5′ UTR and also the 3′-terminal bulged SL in the 3′ UTR, suggesting a possible regulatory role at these sites. Notably, specific binding with ∼2.5 μM affinity of nsp1 to SLIII and its flanking regions in the 5′ UTR was observed. Additionally, we show that, under conditions that would express nsp1 from a DI RNA-encoded sgmRNA, DI RNA levels are greatly reduced; viral RNA species levels, however, are reduced only slightly, and this reduction is transient. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function as a regulator of viral translation or replication but not through its binding of cis-acting SLs V and VI within its own cistron.     

Coexistence of Different Genotypes in the Same Bat and Serological Characterization of Rousettus Bat Coronavirus HKU9 Belonging to a Novel Betacoronavirus Subgroup

Rousettus bat coronavirus HKU9 (Ro-BatCoV HKU9), a recently identified coronavirus of novel Betacoronavirus subgroup D, from Leschenault''s rousette, was previously found to display marked sequence polymorphism among genomes of four strains. Among 10 bats with complete RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), spike (S), and nucleocapsid (N) genes sequenced, three and two sequence clades for all three genes were codetected in two and five bats, respectively, suggesting the coexistence of two or three distinct genotypes of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 in the same bat. Complete genome sequencing of the distinct genotypes from two bats, using degenerate/genome-specific primers with overlapping sequences confirmed by specific PCR, supported the coexistence of at least two distinct genomes in each bat. Recombination analysis using eight Ro-BatCoV HKU9 genomes showed possible recombination events between strains from different bat individuals, which may have allowed for the generation of different genotypes. Western blot assays using recombinant N proteins of Ro-BatCoV HKU9, Betacoronavirus subgroup A (HCoV-HKU1), subgroup B (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV), and subgroup C (Ty-BatCoV HKU4 and Pi-BatCoV HKU5) coronaviruses were subgroup specific, supporting their classification as separate subgroups under Betacoronavirus. Antibodies were detected in 75 (43%) of 175 and 224 (64%) of 350 tested serum samples from Leschenault''s rousette bats by Ro-BatCoV HKU9 N-protein-based Western blot and enzyme immunoassays, respectively. This is the first report describing coinfection of different coronavirus genotypes in bats and coronavirus genotypes of diverse nucleotide variation in the same host. Such unique phenomena, and the unusual instability of ORF7a, are likely due to recombination which may have been facilitated by the dense roosting behavior and long foraging range of Leschenault''s rousette.Coronaviruses infect a wide variety of animals in which they can cause respiratory, enteric, hepatic, and neurological diseases of various severities. Based on genotypic and serological characterization, coronaviruses were traditionally classified into three distinct groups, groups 1, 2, and 3 (3, 27, 59). Recently, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses has renamed the traditional group 1, 2, and 3 coronaviruses as Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus, respectively (http://talk.ictvonline.org/media/p/1230.aspx). Coronaviruses are known to have a high frequency of recombination as a result of their unique mechanism of viral replication (27). Such tendency for recombination and high mutation rates may allow them to adapt to new hosts and ecological niches (24, 47, 52).The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic has boosted interest in the study of coronaviruses in humans and animals (21, 34, 38, 41, 54). In the past few years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of newly described human and animal coronaviruses (2, 4, 5, 8-10, 15-20, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, 35, 36, 39, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53, 56, 58). Two novel human coronaviruses, human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1), belonging to Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus, respectively, have been discovered, in addition to the human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E), and SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) (17, 29, 45, 53, 55). We have also previously described the discovery of a diversity of novel coronaviruses in wild bats and birds in China, including SARSr-Rh-BatCoV, belonging to Betacoronavirus subgroup B, from Chinese horseshoe bats (30, 48, 56). Among these novel coronaviruses, three avian coronaviruses were found to belong to a novel subgroup of Gammacoronavirus (Gammacoronavirus subgroup C), while three bat coronaviruses were found to belong to two novel subgroups of Betacoronavirus (Betacoronavirus subgroups C and D) (48, 50). Based on the presence of the huge diversity of coronaviruses in Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus among various bat species, bats are likely the reservoir for the ancestor of these two coronavirus genera (47).During our genome analysis of these novel coronaviruses, one of them, Rousettus bat coronavirus HKU9 (Ro-BatCoV HKU9), belonging to Betacoronavirus subgroup D, which was identified in Leschenault''s rousette bats, was found to display marked nucleotide and amino acid sequence polymorphism among the four strains with complete genome sequences (50). In our study on HCoV-HKU1, it has been shown that such sequence polymorphisms may indicate the presence of different genotypes (52). By complete genome sequence analysis of the potentially different genotypes of HCoV-HKU1, we have demonstrated for the first time natural recombination in a human coronavirus, resulting in the generation of at least three genotypes (52). We have also recently shown that recombination between different strains of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV from different regions of China may have given rise to the emergence of civet SARSr-CoV (31). To investigate the presence of different genotypes of Ro-BatCoV HKU9, the complete RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (corresponding to nsp12), spike (S), and nucleocapsid (N) gene sequences of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 from 10 additional bats were determined. Since sequence analysis showed the possible coexistence of different genotypes in seven bat individuals, complete genome sequencing of these distinct genotypes from two bats was carried out to investigate for possible recombination events among the different genotypes. In addition, serological characterization of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 was also performed by Western blot and enzyme immunoassays using recombinant Ro-BatCoV HKU9 nucleocapsid proteins and recombinant nucleocapsid proteins of Betacoronavirus subgroup A, B, and C coronaviruses to determine possible cross-reactivity among the different Betacoronavirus subgroups and the seroepidemiology of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 in Leschenault''s rousette bats.     

Ecoepidemiology and Complete Genome Comparison of Different Strains of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Rhinolophus Bat Coronavirus in China Reveal Bats as a Reservoir for Acute,Self-Limiting Infection That Allows Recombination Events

Despite the identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) in Rhinolophus Chinese horseshoe bats (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV) in China, the evolutionary and possible recombination origin of SARSr-CoV remains undetermined. We carried out the first study to investigate the migration pattern and SARSr-Rh-BatCoV genome epidemiology in Chinese horseshoe bats during a 4-year period. Of 1,401 Chinese horseshoe bats from Hong Kong and Guangdong, China, that were sampled, SARSr-Rh-BatCoV was detected in alimentary specimens from 130 (9.3%) bats, with peak activity during spring. A tagging exercise of 511 bats showed migration distances from 1.86 to 17 km. Bats carrying SARSr-Rh-BatCoV appeared healthy, with viral clearance occurring between 2 weeks and 4 months. However, lower body weights were observed in bats positive for SARSr-Rh-BatCoV, but not Rh-BatCoV HKU2. Complete genome sequencing of 10 SARSr-Rh-BatCoV strains showed frequent recombination between different strains. Moreover, recombination was detected between SARSr-Rh-BatCoV Rp3 from Guangxi, China, and Rf1 from Hubei, China, in the possible generation of civet SARSr-CoV SZ3, with a breakpoint at the nsp16/spike region. Molecular clock analysis showed that SARSr-CoVs were newly emerged viruses with the time of the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) at 1972, which diverged between civet and bat strains in 1995. The present data suggest that SARSr-Rh-BatCoV causes acute, self-limiting infection in horseshoe bats, which serve as a reservoir for recombination between strains from different geographical locations within reachable foraging range. Civet SARSr-CoV is likely a recombinant virus arising from SARSr-CoV strains closely related to SARSr-Rh-BatCoV Rp3 and Rf1. Such frequent recombination, coupled with rapid evolution especially in ORF7b/ORF8 region, in these animals may have accounted for the cross-species transmission and emergence of SARS.Coronaviruses can infect a wide variety of animals, causing respiratory, enteric, hepatic, and neurological diseases with different degrees of severity. On the basis of genotypic and serological characteristics, coronaviruses were classified into three distinct groups (2, 20, 54). Among coronaviruses that infect humans, human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) and human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) belong to group 1 coronaviruses and human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) belong to group 2 coronaviruses, whereas severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) has been classified as a group 2b coronavirus, distantly related to group 2a, and the recently discovered group 2c and 2d coronaviruses (6, 8, 10, 18, 31, 38, 43, 46, 49, 50). Recently, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses has proposed renaming the traditional group 1, 2, and 3 coronaviruses Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus, respectively (http://talk.ictvonline.org/media/p/1230.aspx).Among all coronaviruses, SARSr-CoV has caused the most severe disease in humans, with over 700 fatalities since the SARS epidemic in 2003. Although the identification of SARSr-CoV in Himalayan palm civets and raccoon dogs in live animal markets in southern China suggested that wild animals could be the origin of SARS (11), the presence of the virus in only market or farmed civets, but not civets in the wild, and the rapid evolution of SARSr-CoV genomes in market civets suggested that these caged animals were only intermediate hosts (24, 39, 42, 52). Since bats are commonly found and served in wild animal markets and restaurants in Guangdong, China (47), we have previously carried out a study of bats from the region and identified a SARSr-CoV in Rhinolophus Chinese horseshoe bats (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV) (21). Similar viruses have also been found in three other species of horseshoe bats in mainland China (25), supporting the hypothesis that horseshoe bats are a reservoir of SARSr-CoV. Recently, viruses closely related to SARSr-Rh-BatCoV in China were also reported in Chaerophon bats from Africa, although only partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) sequences were available (41). In addition, more than 10 previously unrecognized coronaviruses of huge diversity have since been identified in bats from China and other countries (1, 3, 5, 9, 22, 27, 32, 33, 40, 46, 51), suggesting that bats play an important role in the ecology and evolution of coronaviruses.As a result of the unique mechanism of viral replication, coronaviruses have a high frequency of recombination (20). Such a high recombination rate, coupled with the infidelity of the polymerases of RNA viruses, may allow them to adapt to new hosts and ecological niches (12, 48). Recombination in coronaviruses was first recognized between different strains of murine hepatitis virus (MHV) and subsequently in other coronaviruses, such as infectious bronchitis virus, between MHV and bovine coronavirus, and between feline coronavirus type I and canine coronavirus generating feline coronavirus type II (12, 16, 17, 23). Recently, by complete genome analysis of 22 strains of HCoV-HKU1, we have also documented for the first time that natural recombination events in a human coronavirus can give rise to three different genotypes (48).Although previous studies have attempted to study the possible evolutionary and recombination origin of SARSr-CoV, no definite conclusion can be made on whether the viruses from bats are the direct ancestor of SARSr-CoV in civets and humans, given the paucity of available strains and genome sequences. To better define the epidemiology and evolution of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV in China and their role as a recombination origin of SARSr-CoV in civets, we carried out a 4-year study on coronaviruses in Chinese horseshoe bats in Hong Kong and Guangdong Province of southern China. Bat tagging was also performed to study the migration pattern of bats and viral persistence. The complete genomes of 10 strains of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV obtained at different time were sequenced and compared to previously sequenced genomes. With the availability of this larger set of genome sequences for more accurate analysis, recombination and molecular clock analyses were performed to elucidate the evolutionary origin and time of interspecies transmission of SARSr-CoV.     

Quantitative Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy Analysis of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag-Gag Interaction: Relative Contributions of the CA and NC Domains and Membrane Binding

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 structural polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles on cellular membranes. Previous studies demonstrated the importance of the capsid C-terminal domain (CA-CTD), nucleocapsid (NC), and membrane association in Gag-Gag interactions, but the relationships between these factors remain unclear. In this study, we systematically altered the CA-CTD, NC, and the ability to bind membrane to determine the relative contributions of, and interplay between, these factors. To directly measure Gag-Gag interactions, we utilized chimeric Gag-fluorescent protein fusion constructs and a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) stoichiometry method. We found that the CA-CTD is essential for Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, as the disruption of the CA-CTD has severe impacts on FRET. Data from experiments in which wild-type (WT) and CA-CTD mutant Gag molecules are coexpressed support the idea that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions. Mutations in NC have less-severe impacts on FRET between normally myristoylated Gag proteins than do CA-CTD mutations. Notably, when nonmyristoylated Gag interacts with WT Gag, NC is essential for FRET despite the presence of the CA-CTD. In contrast, constitutively enhanced membrane binding eliminates the need for NC to produce a WT level of FRET. These results from cell-based experiments suggest a model in which both membrane binding and NC-RNA interactions serve similar scaffolding functions so that one can functionally compensate for a defect in the other.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) structural precursor polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles (VLPs). Gag is composed of four major structural domains, matrix (MA), capsid (CA), nucleocapsid (NC), and p6, as well as two spacer peptides, SP1 and SP2 (3, 30, 94). Following particle assembly and release, cleavage by HIV-1 protease separates these domains. However, these domains must work together in the context of the full-length Gag polyprotein to drive particle assembly.Previous studies have mapped two major functional domains involved in the early steps of assembly: first, Gag associates with cellular membranes via basic residues and N-terminal myristoylation of the MA domain (10, 17, 20, 35, 39, 87, 91, 106); second, the Gag-Gag interaction domains that span the CA C-terminal domain (CA-CTD) and NC domain promote Gag multimerization (3, 11, 14, 16, 18, 23, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36, 46, 64, 88, 94, 102, 103). Structural and genetic studies have identified two residues (W184 and M185) within a dimerization interface in the CA-CTD that are critical to CA-CA interactions (33, 51, 74, 96). Analytical ultracentrifugation of heterodimers formed between wild-type (WT) Gag and Gag mutants with changes at these residues suggests that the dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, one of which can be disrupted to form a “half-interface” (22).In addition to the CA-CTD, NC contributes to assembly via 15 basic residues (8, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23, 25, 28, 34, 40, 43, 54, 57, 58, 74, 79, 88, 97, 104, 105), although some researchers have suggested that NC instead contributes to the stability of mature virions after assembly (75, 98, 99). It is thought that the contribution of NC to assembly is due to its ability to bind RNA, since the addition of RNA promotes the formation of particles in vitro (14-16, 37, 46), and RNase treatment disrupts Gag-Gag interactions (11) and immature viral cores (67). However, RNA is not necessary per se, since dimerization motifs can substitute for NC (1, 4, 19, 49, 105). This suggests a model in which RNA serves a structural role, such as a scaffold, to promote Gag-Gag interactions through NC. Based on in vitro studies, it has been suggested that this RNA scaffolding interaction facilitates the low-order Gag multimerization mediated by CA-CTD dimerization (4, 37, 49, 62, 63, 85). Despite a wealth of biochemical data, the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC to Gag multimerization leading to assembly are yet to be determined in cells.Mutations in Gag interaction domains alter membrane binding in addition to affecting Gag multimerization. In particular, mutations or truncations of CA reduce membrane binding (21, 74, 82), and others previously reported that mutations or truncations of NC affect membrane binding (13, 78, 89, 107). These findings are consistent with a myristoyl switch model of membrane binding in which Gag can switch between high- and low-membrane-affinity states (38, 71, 76, 83, 86, 87, 92, 95, 107). Many have proposed, and some have provided direct evidence (95), that Gag multimerization mediated by CA or NC interactions promotes the exposure of the myristoyl moiety to facilitate membrane associations.Gag membrane binding and multimerization appear to be interrelated steps of virus assembly, since membrane binding also facilitates Gag multimerization. Unlike betaretroviruses that fully assemble prior to membrane targeting and envelopment (type B/D), lentiviruses, such as HIV, assemble only on cellular membranes at normal Gag expression levels (type C), although non-membrane-bound Gag complexes exist (45, 58, 60, 61, 65). Consistent with this finding, mutations that reduce Gag membrane associations cause a defect in Gag multimerization (59, 74). Therefore, in addition to their primary effects on Gag-Gag interactions, mutations in Gag interaction domains cause a defect in membrane binding, which, in turn, causes a secondary multimerization defect. To determine the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and the NC domain to Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, it is essential to eliminate secondary effects due to a modulation of membrane binding.Except for studies using a His-tag-mediated membrane binding system (5, 46), biochemical studies of C-type Gag multimerization typically lack membranes. Therefore, these studies do not fully represent particle assembly, which occurs on biological membranes in cells. Furthermore, many biochemical and structural approaches are limited to isolated domains or truncated Gag constructs. Thus, some of these studies are perhaps more relevant to the behavior of protease-cleaved Gag in mature virions. With few exceptions (47, 74), cell-based studies of Gag multimerization have typically been limited to measuring how well mutant Gag is incorporated into VLPs when coexpressed or not with WT Gag. Since VLP production is a complex multistep process, effects of mutations on other steps in the process can confound this indirect measure. For example, NC contributes to VLP production by both promoting multimerization and interacting with the host factor ALIX to promote VLP release (26, 80). To directly assay Gag multimerization in cells, several groups (24, 45, 52, 56) developed microscopy assays based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). These assays measure the transfer of energy between donor and acceptor fluorescent molecules that are brought within ∼5 nm by the association of the proteins to which they are attached (41, 48, 90). However, these microscopy-based Gag FRET assays have not been used to fully elucidate several fundamental aspects of HIV-1 Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane of cells, such as the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC and the effect of membrane binding on Gag-Gag interactions. In this study, we used a FRET stoichiometry method based on calibrated spectral analysis of fluorescence microscopy images (41). This algorithm determines the fractions of both donor and acceptor fluorescent protein-tagged Gag molecules participating in FRET. For cells expressing Gag molecules tagged with donor (cyan fluorescent protein [CFP]) and acceptor (yellow fluorescent protein [YFP]) molecules, this method measures the apparent FRET efficiency, which is proportional to the mole fraction of Gag constructs in complex. By measuring apparent FRET efficiencies, quantitative estimates of the mole fractions of interacting proteins can be obtained.Using this FRET-based assay, we aim to answer two questions: (i) what are the relative contributions of CA-CTD and NC domains to Gag multimerization when secondary effects via membrane binding are held constant, and (ii) what is the effect of modulating membrane binding on the ability of Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag?Our data demonstrate that the CA-CTD dimerization interface is essential for Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane, as fully disrupting the CA-CTD interaction abolishes FRET, whereas a modest level of FRET is still detected in the absence of NC. We also present evidence that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, allowing the formation of a half-interface that can still contribute to Gag multimerization. Notably, when Gag derivatives with an intact CA-CTD were coexpressed with WT Gag, either membrane binding ability or NC was required for the Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag, suggesting functional compensation between these factors.