Evaluation of Replication and Cross-Reactive Antibody Responses of H2 Subtype Influenza Viruses in Mice and Ferrets

H2 influenza viruses have not circulated in humans since 1968, and therefore a large segment of the population would likely be susceptible to infection should H2 influenza viruses reemerge. The development of an H2 pandemic influenza virus vaccine candidate should therefore be considered a priority in pandemic influenza preparedness planning. We selected a group of geographically and temporally diverse wild-type H2 influenza viruses and evaluated the kinetics of replication and compared the ability of these viruses to induce a broadly cross-reactive antibody response in mice and ferrets. In both mice and ferrets, A/Japan/305/1957 (H2N2), A/mallard/NY/1978 (H2N2), and A/swine/MO/2006 (H2N3) elicited the broadest cross-reactive antibody responses against heterologous H2 influenza viruses as measured by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. These data suggested that these three viruses may be suitable candidates for development as live attenuated H2 pandemic influenza virus vaccines.Influenza pandemics occur when a novel influenza virus enters a population with little preexisting immunity (36). During the pandemics of the last century, novel influenza viruses were introduced either directly from an avian reservoir (34) or were the result of reassortment between contemporaneously circulating human, avian, and swine influenza viruses (5, 29, 36). Due to the lack of preexisting immunity to the novel virus, morbidity and mortality rates are typically higher than in epidemics caused by seasonal influenza viruses (4).Although pandemic preparedness planning has largely focused on the highly pathogenic H5 and H7 avian influenza virus subtypes, the recent emergence of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses underscores the need to consider other influenza virus subtypes as well. Of the 16 hemagglutinin (HA) influenza A virus subtypes that have been identified to date, H1, H2, and H3 have been known to cause influenza pandemics (7, 27), suggesting that these viruses are capable of sustained transmission and can cause disease in humans. While the H1 and H3 subtypes have cocirculated in humans since 1977, H2 influenza viruses have not circulated in humans since 1968 (36) and therefore a large segment of the population would likely be susceptible to infection should H2 influenza viruses reemerge. The 1957 H2 pandemic virus was a reassortant that derived the HA, neuraminidase (NA), and PB1 genes from an avian virus and the remaining gene segments from the circulating H1N1 virus (15, 30). As H2 subtype viruses continue to circulate in avian reservoirs worldwide (12, 17, 18, 22, 33), they remain a potential pandemic threat. The development of an H2 influenza virus vaccine candidate should therefore be considered a priority in future pandemic influenza preparedness planning.Given the low likelihood that a previously selected vaccine virus will exactly match the pandemic virus, the ability to elicit a broadly cross-reactive antibody response to antigenically distinct viruses within a subtype is an important consideration in the selection of a pandemic influenza vaccine candidate. Previous studies have examined the ability of inactivated H2 influenza viruses to provide cross-protection against mouse-adapted variants of reassortant human viruses and an avian H2 influenza virus from 1978 (9, 14). Given the potential for live attenuated influenza virus vaccines to confer a great breadth of heterologous cross-protection (1, 2, 6, 35), we recently conducted a study evaluating cold-adapted A/Ann Arbor/6/1960 (AA CA), an H2 influenza virus used as the backbone of the seasonal live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine currently licensed in the United States (3). However, as H2 influenza virus continues to circulate widely and appear in migratory birds (10, 24, 26), in poultry markets (20), and in swine (21), with evidence of interregional gene transmission (19, 22), a more extensive evaluation of recent isolates may be warranted in the selection of a potential H2 pandemic vaccine candidate.H2 influenza viruses fall into three main lineages: a human lineage, a North American avian lineage, and a Eurasian avian lineage (29). In addition to viruses whose replicative ability in mammals has previously been established (11, 21, 23, 25), we selected a group of geographically and temporally diverse H2 influenza viruses from each lineage. We evaluated the kinetics of replication of each of these viruses in mice and ferrets and compared the abilities of these viruses to induce a broadly cross-reactive antibody response to determine which of these viruses would be suitable for further development as an H2 pandemic influenza vaccine candidate.     

Characterization of the H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Derived from Wild Pikas in China

The highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus emerged from China in 1996 and has spread across Eurasia and Africa, with a continuous stream of new cases of human infection appearing since the first large-scale outbreak among migratory birds at Qinghai Lake. The role of wild birds, which are the natural reservoirs for the virus, in the epidemiology of the H5N1 virus has raised great public health concern, but their role in the spread of the virus within the natural ecosystem of free-ranging terrestrial wild mammals remains unclear. In this study, we investigated H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas in an attempt to trace the circulation of the virus. Seroepidemiological surveys confirmed a natural H5N1 virus infection of wild pikas in their native environment. The hemagglutination gene of the H5N1 virus isolated from pikas reveals two distinct evolutionary clades, a mixed/Vietnam H5N1 virus sublineage (MV-like pika virus) and a wild bird Qinghai (QH)-like H5N1 virus sublineage (QH-like pika virus). The amino acid residue (glutamic acid) at position 627 encoded by the PB2 gene of the MV-like pika virus was different from that of the QH-like pika virus; the residue of the MV-like pika virus was the same as that of the goose H5N1 virus (A/GS/Guangdong [GD]/1/96). Further, we discovered that in contrast to the MV-like pika virus, which is nonpathogenic to mice, the QH-like pika virus is highly pathogenic. To mimic the virus infection of pikas, we intranasally inoculated rabbits, a species closely related to pikas, with the H5N1 virus of pika origin. Our findings first demonstrate that wild pikas are mammalian hosts exposed to H5N1 subtype avian influenza viruses in the natural ecosystem and also imply a potential transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus from wild mammals into domestic mammalian hosts and humans.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an extremely infectious, systemic viral disease that causes a high rate of mortality in birds. HPAI H5N1 viruses are now endemic in avian populations in Southeast Asia and have repeatedly been transmitted to humans (9, 14, 27). Since 2003, the H5N1 subtype has been reported in 391 human cases of influenza and has caused 247 human deaths in 15 countries, leading to greater than 60% mortality among infected individuals (38). Although currently incapable of sustained human-to-human transmission, H5N1 viruses undoubtedly pose a serious threat to public health, as well as to the global economy. Hence, preparedness for such a threat is a global priority (36).Wild birds are considered to be natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses (6, 18, 21, 35, 37). Of the 144 type A influenza virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HA-NA) combinations, 103 have been found in wild birds (5, 7, 17, 37). Since the first HPAI outbreak among migratory wild birds appeared at Qinghai Lake in western China in May 2005 (3, 16, 25, 34, 41), HPAI viruses of the H5N1 subtype have been isolated from poultry throughout Eurasia and Africa. The continued occurrence of human cases has created a situation that could facilitate a pandemic emergence. There is heightened concern that wild birds are a reservoir for influenza A viruses that switch hosts and stably adapt to mammals, including horses, swine, and humans (11, 19, 22, 37).Despite the recent expansion of avian influenza virus (AIV) surveillance and genomic data (5, 17, 20, 21, 33, 40), fundamental questions remain concerning the ecology and evolution of these viruses. Little is known about how terrestrial wild mammals within their natural ecological systems affect HPAI H5N1 epidemiology or about the virus''s effects on public health, though there are many reports of natural and experimental H5N1 virus infection in animals belonging to the taxonomic orders Carnivora (12, 13, 15, 28, 29) and Artiodactyla (15). Herein, we provide the results of our investigation into H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas (Ochotona curzoniae of the order Lagomorpha) within their natural ecological setting. We describe our attempt to trace the circulation of H5N1 viruses and to characterize pika H5N1 influenza virus (PK virus).     

A Novel Genotype H9N2 Influenza Virus Possessing Human H5N1 Internal Genomes Has Been Circulating in Poultry in Eastern China since 1998

Many novel reassortant influenza viruses of the H9N2 genotype have emerged in aquatic birds in southern China since their initial isolation in this region in 1994. However, the genesis and evolution of H9N2 viruses in poultry in eastern China have not been investigated systematically. In the current study, H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in eastern China during the past 10 years were characterized genetically and antigenically. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these H9N2 viruses have undergone extensive reassortment to generate multiple novel genotypes, including four genotypes (J, F, K, and L) that have never been recognized before. The major H9N2 influenza viruses represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/1994 (Ck/BJ/1/94)-like viruses circulating in poultry in eastern China before 1998 have been gradually replaced by A/Chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 (Ck/SH/F/98)-like viruses, which have a genotype different from that of viruses isolated in southern China. The similarity of the internal genes of these H9N2 viruses to those of the H5N1 influenza viruses isolated from 2001 onwards suggests that the Ck/SH/F/98-like virus may have been the donor of internal genes of human and poultry H5N1 influenza viruses circulating in Eurasia. Experimental studies showed that some of these H9N2 viruses could be efficiently transmitted by the respiratory tract in chicken flocks. Our study provides new insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses and supports the notion that some of these viruses may have been the donors of internal genes found in H5N1 viruses.Wild birds, including wild waterfowls, gulls, and shorebirds, are the natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses, in which they are thought to be in evolutionary stasis (2, 33). However, when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to new hosts such as terrestrial poultry or mammals, they evolve rapidly and may cause occasional severe systemic infection with high morbidity (20, 29). Despite the fact that avian influenza virus infection occurs commonly in chickens, it is unable to persist for a long period of time due to control efforts and/or a failure of the virus to adapt to new hosts (29). In the past 20 years, greater numbers of outbreaks in poultry have occurred, suggesting that the avian influenza virus can infect and spread in aberrant hosts for an extended period of time (5, 14-16, 18, 32).During the past 10 years, H9N2 influenza viruses have become panzootic in Eurasia and have been isolated from outbreaks in poultry worldwide (3, 5, 11, 14-16, 18, 24). A great deal of previous studies demonstrated that H9N2 influenza viruses have become established in terrestrial poultry in different Asian countries (5, 11, 13, 14, 18, 21, 24, 35). In 1994, H9N2 viruses were isolated from diseased chickens in Guangdong province, China, for the first time (4), and later in domestic poultry in other provinces in China (11, 16, 18, 35). Two distinct H9N2 virus lineages represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/94 (H9N2) and A/Quail/Hong Kong/G1/98 (H9N2), respectively, have been circulating in terrestrial poultry of southern China (9). Occasionally these viruses expand their host range to other mammals, including pigs and humans (6, 17, 22, 34). Increasing epidemiological and laboratory findings suggest that chickens may play an important role in expanding the host range for avian influenza virus. Our systematic surveillance of influenza viruses in chickens in China showed that H9N2 subtype influenza viruses continued to be prevalent in chickens in mainland China from 1994 to 2008 (18, 19, 36).Eastern China contains one metropolitan city (Shanghai) and five provinces (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Shandong, and Jiangxi), where domestic poultry account for approximately 50% of the total poultry population in China. Since 1996, H9N2 influenza viruses have been isolated regularly from both chickens and other minor poultry species in our surveillance program in the eastern China region, but their genetic diversity and the interrelationships between H9N2 influenza viruses and different types of poultry have not been determined. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the evolution and properties of these viruses. The current report provides insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in eastern China and presents new evidence for the potential crossover between H9N2 and H5N1 influenza viruses in this region.     

Intradermal Vaccination with Influenza Virus-Like Particles by Using Microneedles Induces Protection Superior to That with Intramuscular Immunization

Influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) are a promising cell culture-based vaccine, and the skin is considered an attractive immunization site. In this study, we examined the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of influenza VLPs (H1N1 A/PR/8/34) after skin vaccination using vaccine dried on solid microneedle arrays. Coating of microneedles with influenza VLPs using an unstabilized formulation was found to decrease hemagglutinin (HA) activity, whereas inclusion of trehalose disaccharide preserved the HA activity of influenza VLP vaccines after microneedles were coated. Microneedle vaccination of mice in the skin with a single dose of stabilized influenza VLPs induced 100% protection against challenge infection with a high lethal dose. In contrast, unstabilized influenza VLPs, as well as intramuscularly injected vaccines, provided inferior immunity and only partial protection (≤40%). The stabilized microneedle vaccination group showed IgG2a levels that were 1 order of magnitude higher than those of other groups and had the lowest lung viral titers after challenge. Also, levels of recall immune responses, including hemagglutination inhibition titers, neutralizing antibodies, and antibody-secreting plasma cells, were significantly higher after skin vaccination with stabilized formulations. Therefore, our results indicate that HA stabilization, combined with vaccination via the skin using a vaccine formulated as a solid microneedle patch, confers protection superior to that with intramuscular injection and enables potential dose-sparing effects which are reflected by pronounced increases in rapid recall immune responses against influenza virus.Influenza is a major health threat among infectious diseases, posing a significant burden for public health worldwide. Over 200,000 hospitalizations and approximately 36,000 deaths are estimated to occur annually in the United States alone (48, 49). Vaccination is the most cost-effective measure for controlling influenza. However, the influenza vaccine needs to be updated and manufactured every year due to changes in circulating viral strains. Current influenza vaccines rely on egg substrate-based production, a lengthy process with limited capacity that can cause shortages in available vaccine supplies. The recent 2009 outbreak of H1N1 influenza virus is a good example of the urgent need to develop a more effective vaccine platform and vaccination method (38).Influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) have been suggested as a promising alternative candidate to current influenza vaccines. Influenza VLPs are noninfectious particles that mimic the virus in structure and morphology, can be produced using an egg-free cell culture system, and have been shown to be highly immunogenic, inducing protective immunity (9, 15, 19, 27, 35, 41, 42, 44). Most current vaccines are administered intramuscularly to humans in liquid formulations using hypodermic needles or syringes. Another strategy to meet the potential need for mass vaccination would be to develop an effective method for vaccine delivery to the skin (4, 8, 32, 50, 52). The skin is considered an important peripheral immune organ rich in potent immune-inducing cells, including Langerhans cells (LCs), dermal dendritic cells (DCs), and keratinocytes (5, 13, 14, 22). LCs and DCs residing in the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin have been shown to play an important role in antigen processing and presentation following skin immunization (1, 13, 14, 22). Intradermal (ID) vaccination delivering antigens to the dermal layer of the skin has been performed in many clinical studies and have demonstrated dose-sparing effects in some cases (4, 28, 29). Particularly, ID delivery of vaccines might be more effective in the elderly population (50), the highest risk group for influenza epidemics (49). However, ID delivery of vaccines using hypodermic needles is painful and needs highly trained medical personnel. In addition, more frequent local reactions at the injection site were observed after ID delivery. Therefore, a simple and effective approach for vaccination without using hypodermic needles would be highly desirable.To overcome the skin barrier of the outer layer of stratum corneum, solid microneedles were previously coated with inactivated influenza viruses and used to successfully deliver vaccines to the skin, which provided protection comparable to that with conventional intramuscular immunizations (32, 52). Other vaccines have also been delivered using microneedles (17, 17a), but VLPs have never been used this way before. Delivery of a powdered form of inactivated influenza vaccines to the skin has also been demonstrated using a high-speed jet delivery device (10). These previous studies used high doses of vaccines, possibly due to the instability of vaccines in dry formulations.Influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is responsible for attachment of the virus to sialic acid-containing receptors on target cells. However, it is not well understood how functional activity of HA affects the immunogenicity of influenza VLP vaccines. For the first time in this study, we investigated the effect of HA stability, immune responses, and protective efficacies of solid-microneedle VLP vaccines containing H1 HA as a major influenza viral component after delivery to the skin in comparison to results with intramuscular immunization. We found that the functional integrity of HA in influenza VLPs significantly influenced the immunological and protective outcomes for both microneedle and intramuscular vaccination. In addition, we have observed differential outcomes contributing to the protective immunity by the delivery of HA-stabilized VLPs to the skin in terms of the types of immune responses, recall antibody responses, and viral clearance at an early time point after challenge compared to those induced by intramuscular immunization.     

Elastase-Dependent Live Attenuated Swine Influenza A Viruses Are Immunogenic and Confer Protection against Swine Influenza A Virus Infection in Pigs

Influenza A viruses cause significant morbidity in swine, resulting in a substantial economic burden. Swine influenza virus (SIV) infection also poses important human public health concerns. Vaccination is the primary method for the prevention of influenza virus infection. Previously, we generated two elastase-dependent mutant SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02(H1N1): A/Sw/Sk-R345V (R345V) and A/Sw/Sk-R345A (R345A). These two viruses are highly attenuated in pigs, making them good candidates for a live-virus vaccine. In this study, the immunogenicity and the ability of these candidates to protect against SIV infection were evaluated in pigs. We report that intratracheally administrated R345V and R345A induced antigen-specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity characterized by increased production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in the serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, high hemagglutination inhibition titers in serum, an enhanced level of lymphocyte proliferation, and higher numbers of gamma interferon-secreting cells at the site of infection. Based on the immunogenicity results, the R345V virus was further tested in a protection trial in which pigs were vaccinated twice with R345V and then challenged with homologous A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02, H1N1 antigenic variant A/Sw/Indiana/1726/88 or heterologous subtypic H3N2 A/Sw/Texas/4199-2/9/98. Our data showed that two vaccinations with R345V provided pigs with complete protection from homologous H1N1 SIV infection and partial protection from heterologous subtypic H3N2 SIV infection. This protection was characterized by significantly reduced macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions, lower virus titers from the respiratory tract, and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Thus, elastase-dependent SIV mutants can be used as live-virus vaccines against swine influenza in pigs.Swine influenza virus (SIV) is the causative pathogen of swine influenza, a highly contagious, acute respiratory viral disease of swine. The mortality of SIV-infected pigs is usually low, although morbidity may approach 100%. Swine influenza is characterized by sudden onset, coughing, respiratory distress, weight loss, fever, nasal discharge, and rapid recovery (38). SIV is a member of the influenza virus A genus in the Orthomyxoviridae family, and the virus has a genome consisting of eight segments of negative-sense single-stranded RNA (29). Epithelial cells in the swine respiratory tract have receptors for both avian and mammalian influenza viruses (13); thus, pigs could potentially serve as “mixing vessels” for the generation of new reassortant strains of influenza A virus that have pandemic capacity. There are a number of reports in which the direct transmission of influenza viruses from pigs to humans has been documented (6, 12, 52), and several of these cases have resulted in human fatalities (19, 35, 40, 53). Consequently, effective control of SIV would be beneficial to both humans and animals.Until 1998, classical H1N1 SIVs were the predominant isolates from pigs in the United States and Canada (5, 28). In 1997 to 1998, a dramatic change in the epidemiologic pattern of SIV began. Serological studies conducted by Olsen and colleagues in 1997 to 1998 detected a significant increase in H3-seropositive individuals, and H3N2 SIVs were isolated from pigs in both the United States and Canada (17, 54). Furthermore, reassortment between H3N2 viruses and classical H1N1 SIV resulted in the appearance of H1N2 reassortant viruses (14, 15). In addition to the isolation of H4N6 viruses, which are of duck origin, in pigs in Canada (16), wholly avian viruses of the H3N3 and H1N1 subtypes have also been isolated from Canadian pigs (18). In general, three major SIV subtypes exist, i.e., H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2, each of which has multiple genetic and antigenic variants circulating in North American swine populations (18, 28). The increased incidence of avian-like or human-like SIV reassortants raises concerns for public health and requires research devoted to the development of cross-protective SIV vaccines.Currently available swine influenza vaccines are based on inactivated whole virus of the H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes. Application of these vaccines reduces the severity of disease but does not provide consistent protection from infection (3, 22). In contrast to killed vaccines that are administered intramuscularly, intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) induce an immune response at the site of natural infection. Therefore, an LAIV has the potential to induce broad humoral and cellular immune responses that could provide protection against antigenically different influenza viruses. LAIV based on attenuation of the virus by cold adaptation are available for humans (2) and horses (41). However, to date, no SIV LAIV are commercially available for use in swine in North America. Recent studies by Solorzano et al. showed that a mutant SIV with a truncated NS1 protein was highly attenuated in pigs (36). In addition, this SIV/NS1 LAIV was capable of stimulating a protective immune response against homologous SIVs and a partial protection against heterologous subtypic wild-type (WT) SIVs (31, 50). Stech and colleagues demonstrated that the conversion of a conserved cleavage site in the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein from a trypsin-sensitive site to an elastase-sensitive site results in in vivo attenuation of the influenza virus in mouse models (9, 37). Furthermore, these elastase-dependent LAIV were able to induce protective systemic and mucosal immune responses. Recently, we showed that two elastase-dependent SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02 (SIV/Sk02), R345V and R345A, are attenuated in their natural host, pigs (23). In the current study, we addressed the immunogenic and cross-protective abilities of these mutants.     

Evaluation of Recombinant Influenza Virus-Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccines in Macaques

There is an urgent need for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccines that induce robust mucosal immunity. Influenza A viruses (both H1N1 and H3N2) were engineered to express simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) CD8 T-cell epitopes and evaluated following administration to the respiratory tracts of 11 pigtail macaques. Influenza virus was readily detected from respiratory tract secretions, although the infections were asymptomatic. Animals seroconverted to influenza virus and generated CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses to influenza virus proteins. SIV-specific CD8 T-cell responses bearing the mucosal homing marker β7 integrin were induced by vaccination of naïve animals. Further, SIV-specific CD8 T-cell responses could be boosted by recombinant influenza virus-SIV vaccination of animals with already-established SIV infection. Sequential vaccination with influenza virus-SIV recombinants of different subtypes (H1N1 followed by H3N2 or vice versa) produced only a limited boost in immunity, probably reflecting T-cell immunity to conserved internal proteins of influenza A virus. SIV challenge of macaques vaccinated with an influenza virus expressing a single SIV CD8 T cell resulted in a large anamnestic recall CD8 T-cell response, but immune escape rapidly ensued and there was no impact on chronic SIV viremia. Although our results suggest that influenza virus-HIV vaccines hold promise for the induction of mucosal immunity to HIV, broader antigen cover will be needed to limit cytotoxic T-lymphocyte escape.Developing a safe and effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine is one of the defining scientific challenges of our time. Induction of peripheral CD8 T-cell immunity to HIV did not protect against sexual exposure to HIV type 1 (HIV-1) in humans in a recent efficacy trial (11, 43). In simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-macaque studies, peripheral CD8 T-cell immunity can effectively control viremia (40) but is often observed to have a transient or limited role in delaying SIV disease in macaques (32). The gradual accumulation of immune escape at CD8 T-cell epitopes undermines the effectiveness of CD8 T-cell immunity to SIV (6, 22, 46). It is likely that inducing mucosal CD8 T-cell immunity to HIV will be more effective at limiting viral replication during the very early phases of acute infection, prior to massive viral dissemination and destruction of large numbers of CD4 T cells (50). The induction of multifunctional mucosal CD8 T cells by live attenuated SIV vaccination of macaques is thought to play a significant role in the success of this strategy (25, 26); however, it is unfortunately too dangerous for clinical trials at present.A series of mucosal viral and bacterial HIV vaccine vectors have been studied in recent years; however, none have yet proceeded to advanced clinical trials. Live attenuated poliovirus vectors have shown promise in SIV studies, but these viruses can in rare cases revert to virulence (14). Salmonella-based SIV vaccine vectors are able to induce CD8 T-cell responses which express the α4β7 integrin mucosal homing marker when administered orally (20, 24). However, there may be a much stronger link between concomitant genital tract immunity and immunity induced at respiratory mucosal sites compared to that induced at enteric sites (33, 38, 42). Vesicular stomatitis virus vectors that replicate in the nasal mucosa show promise in SIV-macaque trials but are potentially neurotoxic (55). Replication-competent adenovirus vectors have looked promising in some SHIV-macaque studies (49) but failed to provide significant protection in a recent SIV-macaque study (17) and could have similar issues of enhanced infection rates as seen in the recent efficacy trials of replication-incompetent adenovirus type 5 vectors.A mucosal vector system that has several advantages over existing models but that is relatively unexplored is recombinant attenuated influenza viruses. Such viruses (i) have an existing reverse genetics system to readily generate and manipulate recombinant viruses (31, 34), (ii) are effective as anti-influenza vaccines and licensed for human use (e.g., “Flumist” vaccine [9]) with ready production capability, (iii) have robust respiratory mucosal replication that should facilitate genital mucosal immunity, and (iv) can be generated with a variety of hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) glycoproteins, potentially enabling these viruses to be administered sequentially in prime-boost combinations to limit the effect of antivector humoral immunity (34). Mouse-adapted recombinant influenza virus-HIV vectors have been studied in mice and demonstrated significant induction of cellular immunity at mucosal sites (8, 27, 28, 44, 48). However, although several native influenza viruses replicate efficiently in the respiratory tracts of Asian macaque species (10, 12, 52), no studies to date have examined the immunogenicity or efficacy of recombinant attenuated influenza virus-SIV vectors in macaques.     

Transmission of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus and Impact of Prior Exposure to Seasonal Strains or Interferon Treatment

Novel swine-origin influenza viruses of the H1N1 subtype were first detected in humans in April 2009. As of 12 August 2009, 180,000 cases had been reported globally. Despite the fact that they are of the same antigenic subtype as seasonal influenza viruses circulating in humans since 1977, these viruses continue to spread and have caused the first influenza pandemic since 1968. Here we show that a pandemic H1N1 strain replicates in and transmits among guinea pigs with similar efficiency to that of a seasonal H3N2 influenza virus. This transmission was, however, partially disrupted when guinea pigs had preexisting immunity to recent human isolates of either the H1N1 or H3N2 subtype and was fully blocked through daily intranasal administration of interferon to either inoculated or exposed animals. Our results suggest that partial immunity resulting from prior exposure to conventional human strains may blunt the impact of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the human population. In addition, the use of interferon as an antiviral prophylaxis may be an effective way to limit spread in at-risk populations.A pandemic of novel swine-origin influenza virus (H1N1) is developing rapidly. As of 12 August 2009, nearly 180,000 cases had been reported to the WHO from around the globe (36). Sustained human-to-human transmission has furthermore been observed in multiple countries, prompting the WHO to declare a public health emergency of international concern and to raise the pandemic alert level to phase 6 (7).Swine are a natural host of influenza viruses, and although sporadic incidences of human infection with swine influenza viruses occur (8, 9, 14, 29, 35), human-to-human transmission is rare. H1N1 influenza viruses have likely circulated in swine since shortly after the 1918 human influenza pandemic (38). From the 1930s, when a swine influenza virus was first isolated, to the late 1990s, this classical swine lineage has remained relatively stable antigenically (34). In the late 1990s, however, genetic reassortment between a human H3N2 virus, a North American avian virus, and a classical swine influenza virus produced a triple reassortant virus, which subsequently spread among North American swine (34). Further reassortment events involving human influenza viruses led to the emergence in pigs of triple reassortants of the H1N1 and H1N2 subtypes (34). None of these swine viruses have demonstrated the potential for sustained human-to-human transmission.The swine-origin influenza viruses now emerging in the human population possess a previously uncharacterized constellation of eight genes (28). The NA and M segments derive from a Eurasian swine influenza virus lineage, having entered pigs from the avian reservoir around 1979, while the HA, NP, and NS segments are of the classical swine lineage and the PA, PB1, and PB2 segments derive from the North American triple reassortant swine lineage (13). This unique combination of genetic elements (segments from multiple swine influenza virus lineages, some of them derived from avian and human influenza viruses) may account for the improved fitness of pandemic H1N1 viruses, relative to that of previous swine isolates, in humans.Several uncertainties remain about how this outbreak will develop over time. Although the novel H1N1 virus has spread over a broad geographical area, the number of people known to be infected remains low in many countries, which could be due, at least in part, to the lack of optimal transmission of influenza viruses outside the winter season; thus, it is unclear at this point whether the new virus will become established in the long term. Two major factors will shape the epidemiology of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the coming months and years: the intrinsic transmissibility of the virus and the degree of protection offered by previous exposure to seasonal human strains. Initial estimates of the reproductive number (R₀) have been made based on the epidemiology of the virus to date and suggest that its rate of spread is intermediate between that of seasonal flu and that of previous pandemic strains (3, 11). However, more precise estimates of R₀ will depend on better surveillance data in the future. The transmission phenotype of pandemic H1N1 viruses in a ferret model was also recently reported and was found to be similar to (16, 27) or less efficient (25) than that of seasonal H1N1 strains. The reason for this discrepancy in the ferret model is unclear.Importantly, in considering the human population, the impact of immunity against seasonal strains on the transmission potential of pandemic H1N1 viruses is not clear. According to conventional wisdom, an influenza virus must be of a hemagglutinin (HA) subtype which is novel to the human population in order to cause a pandemic (18, 38). Analysis of human sera collected from individuals with diverse influenza virus exposure histories has indicated that in those born in the early part of the 20th century, neutralizing activity against A/California/04/09 (Cal/04/09) virus is often present (16). Conversely, serological analyses of ferret postinfection sera (13) and human pre- and postvaccination sera (4a) revealed that neutralizing antibodies against recently circulating human H1N1 viruses do not react with pandemic H1N1 isolates. These serological findings may explain the relatively small number of cases seen to date in individuals greater than 65 years of age (6). Even in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, however, a measure of immune protection sufficient to dampen transmission may be present in a host who has recently experienced seasonal influenza (10). If, on the other hand, transmission is high and immunity is low, then pandemic H1N1 strains will likely continue to spread rapidly through the population. In this situation, a range of pharmaceutical interventions will be needed to dampen the public health impact of the pandemic.Herein we used the guinea pig model (4, 21-24, 26, 30) to assess the transmissibility of the pandemic H1N1 strains Cal/04/09 and A/Netherlands/602/09 (NL/602/09) relative to that of previous human and swine influenza viruses. To better mimic the human situation, we then tested whether the efficiency of transmission is decreased by preexisting immunity to recent human H1N1 or H3N2 influenza viruses. Finally, we assessed the efficacy of intranasal treatment with type I interferon (IFN) in limiting the replication and transmission of pandemic H1N1 viruses.     

Differential Localization and Function of PB1-F2 Derived from Different Strains of Influenza A Virus

PB1-F2 is a viral protein that is encoded by the PB1 gene of influenza A virus by alternative translation. It varies in length and sequence context among different strains. The present study examines the functions of PB1-F2 proteins derived from various human and avian viruses. While H1N1 PB1-F2 was found to target mitochondria and enhance apoptosis, H5N1 PB1-F2, surprisingly, did not localize specifically to mitochondria and displayed no ability to enhance apoptosis. Introducing Leu into positions 69 (Q69L) and 75 (H75L) in the C terminus of H5N1 PB1-F2 drove 40.7% of the protein to localize to mitochondria compared with the level of mitochondrial localization of wild-type H5N1 PB1-F2, suggesting that a Leu-rich sequence in the C terminus is important for targeting of mitochondria. However, H5N1 PB1-F2 contributes to viral RNP activity, which is responsible for viral RNA replication. Lastly, although the swine-origin influenza virus (S-OIV) contained a truncated form of PB1-F2 (12 amino acids [aa]), potential mutation in the future may enable it to contain a full-length product. Therefore, the functions of this putative S-OIV PB1-F2 (87 aa) were also investigated. Although this PB1-F2 from the mutated S-OIV shares only 54% amino acid sequence identity with that of seasonal H1N1 virus, it also increased viral RNP activity. The plaque size and growth curve of the viruses with and without S-OIV PB1-F2 differed greatly. The PB1-F2 protein has various lengths, amino acid sequences, cellular localizations, and functions in different strains, which result in strain-specific pathogenicity. Such genetic and functional diversities make it flexible and adaptable in maintaining the optimal replication efficiency and virulence for various strains of influenza A virus.Influenza A viruses contain eight negative-stranded RNA segments that encode 11 known viral proteins. The 11th viral protein was originally found in a search for unknown peptides during influenza A virus infection recognized by CD8⁺ T cells. It was termed PB1-F2 and is the second protein that is alternatively translated by the same PB1 gene (8). PB1-F2 can be encoded in a large number of influenza A viruses that are isolated from various hosts, including human and avian hosts. The size of PB1-F2 ranges from 57 to 101 amino acids (aa) (41). While strain PR8 (H1N1) contains a PB1-F2 with a length of 87 aa, PB1-F2 is terminated at amino acid position 57 in most human H1N1 viruses and is thus a truncated form compared with the length in PR8. Human H3N2 and most avian influenza A viruses encode a full-length PB1-F2 protein, which is at least 87 aa (7). Many cellular functions of the PB1-F2 protein, and especially the protein of the PR8 strain, have been reported (11, 25). For example, PR8 PB1-F2 localizes to mitochondria in infected and transfected cells (8, 15, 38, 39), suggesting that PB1-F2 enhances influenza A virus-mediated apoptosis in human monocytes (8). The phosphorylation of the PR8 PB1-F2 protein has been suggested to be one of the crucial causes of the promotion of apoptosis (30).The rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in the PB1-F2 gene are higher than those in the PB1 gene (7, 20, 21, 37, 42). Recent work has shown that both PR8 PB1-F2 and H5N1 PB1-F2 are important regulators of influenza A virus virulence (1). Additionally, the expression of the 1918 influenza A virus (H1N1) PB1-F2 increases the incidence of secondary bacterial pneumonia (10, 28). However, PB1-F2 is not essential for viral replication because the knockout of PB1-F2 in strain PR8 has no effect on the viral titer (40), suggesting that PB1-F2 may have cellular functions other than those that were originally thought (29).PB1-F2 was translated from the same RNA segment as the PB1 protein, whose function is strongly related to virus RNP activity, which is responsible for RNA chain elongation and which exhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity (2, 5) and endonuclease activity (9, 16, 26). Previous research has already proved that the knockout of PR8 PB1-F2 reduced virus RNP activity, revealing that PR8 PB1-F2 contributes to virus RNP activity (27), even though PB1-F2 has no effect on the virus growth rate (40). In the present study, not only PR8 PB1-F2 but also H5N1 PB1-F2 and putative full-length swine-origin influenza A virus (S-OIV) PB1-F2 contributed to virus RNP activity. However, PR8 PB1-F2 and H5N1 PB1-F2 exhibit different biological behaviors, including different levels of expression, cellular localizations, and apoptosis enhancements. The molecular determinants of the different localizations were also addressed. The function of the putative PB1-F2 derived from S-OIV was also studied. The investigation described here reveals that PB1-F2 proteins derived from various viral strains exhibited distinct functions, possibly contributing to the variation in the virulence of influenza A viruses.     

Virulence-Associated Substitution D222G in the Hemagglutinin of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Virus Affects Receptor Binding

The clinical impact of the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus (pdmH1N1) has been relatively low. However, amino acid substitution D222G in the hemagglutinin of pdmH1N1 has been associated with cases of severe disease and fatalities. D222G was introduced in a prototype pdmH1N1 by reverse genetics, and the effect on virus receptor binding, replication, antigenic properties, and pathogenesis and transmission in animal models was investigated. pdmH1N1 with D222G caused ocular disease in mice without further indications of enhanced virulence in mice and ferrets. pdmH1N1 with D222G retained transmissibility via aerosols or respiratory droplets in ferrets and guinea pigs. The virus displayed changes in attachment to human respiratory tissues in vitro, in particular increased binding to macrophages and type II pneumocytes in the alveoli and to tracheal and bronchial submucosal glands. Virus attachment studies further indicated that pdmH1N1 with D222G acquired dual receptor specificity for complex α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids. Molecular dynamics modeling of the hemagglutinin structure provided an explanation for the retention of α2,6 binding. Altered receptor specificity of the virus with D222G thus affected interaction with cells of the human lower respiratory tract, possibly explaining the observed association with enhanced disease in humans.In April 2009, the H1N1 influenza A virus of swine origin was detected in humans in North America (9, 12, 42). Evidence for its origin came from analyses of the viral genome, with six gene segments displaying the closest resemblance to American “triple-reassortant” swine viruses and two to “Eurasian-lineage” swine viruses (13, 42). After this first detection in humans, the virus spread rapidly around the globe, starting the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century. The 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus (pdmH1N1) has been relatively mild, with a spectrum of disease ranging from subclinical infections or mild upper respiratory tract illness to sporadic cases of severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (3, 11, 27, 29, 30, 37). Overall, the case-fatality rate during the start of the pandemic was not significantly higher than in seasonal epidemics in most countries. However, a marked difference was observed in the case-fatality rate in specific age groups, with seasonal influenza generally causing highest mortality in elderly and immunocompromised individuals, and the pdmH1N1 affecting a relatively large proportion of (previously healthy) young individuals (3, 11, 27, 29, 30, 37).Determinants of influenza A virus virulence have been mapped for a wide variety of zoonotic and pandemic influenza viruses to the polymerase genes, hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1). Such virulence-associated substitutions generally facilitate more efficient replication in humans via improved interactions with host cell factors. Since most of these virulence-associated substitutions were absent in the earliest pdmH1N1s, it has been speculated that the virus could acquire some of these mutations, potentially resulting in the emergence of more pathogenic viruses. Such virulence markers could be acquired by gene reassortment with cocirculating influenza A viruses, or by mutation. The influenza virus polymerase genes, in particular PB2, have been shown to be important determinants of the virulence of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 and H7N7 viruses and the transmission of the 1918 H1N1 Spanish influenza virus (17, 26, 34, 51). One of the most commonly identified virulence markers to date is E627K in PB2. The glutamic acid (E) residue is generally found in avian influenza viruses, while human viruses have a lysine (K), and this mutation was described as a determinant of host range in vitro (48). Given that all human and many zoonotic influenza viruses of the last century contained 627K, it was surprising that the pdmH1N1 had 627E. In addition, an aspartate (D)-to-asparagine (N) substitution at position 701 (D701N) of PB2 has previously been shown to expand the host range of avian H5N1 virus to mice and humans and to increase virus transmission in guinea pigs (26, 46). Like E627K, D701N was absent in the genome of pdmH1N1. Thus, the pdmH1N1 was the first known human pandemic virus with 627E and 701D, and it has been speculated that pdmH1N1 could mutate into a more virulent form by acquiring one of these mutations or both. Recently, it was shown that neither E627K nor D701N in PB2 of pdmH1N1 increased its virulence in ferrets and mice (18). The PB1-F2 protein has previously also been associated with high pathogenicity of the 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 viruses (8). The PB1-F2 protein of the pdmH1N1 is truncated due to premature stop codons. However, restoration of the PB1-F2 reading frame did not result in viruses with increased virulence (15). The NS1 protein of pdmH1N1 is also truncated due to a stop codon and, as a result, does not contain a PDZ ligand domain that is involved in cell-signaling pathways and has been implicated in the pathogenicity of 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 viruses (5, 8, 21). Surprisingly, restoration of a full-length version of the NS1 gene did not result in increased virulence in animal models (16). Mutations affecting virulence and host range have further frequently been mapped to hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) in relation to their interaction with α2,3- or α2,6-linked sialic acids (SAs), the virus receptors on host cells (17, 32, 35, 50). The HA gene of previous pandemic viruses incorporated substitutions that allow efficient attachment to α2,6-SAs—the virus receptor on human cells—compared to ancestral avian viruses that attach more efficiently to α2,3-SAs (35, 47, 50).To search for mutations of potential importance to public health, numerous laboratories performed genome sequencing of pdmH1N1s, resulting in the real-time accumulation of information on emergence of potential virulence markers. Of specific interest were reports on amino acid substitutions from aspartic acid (D) to glycine (G) at position 222 (position 225 in H3) in HA of pdmH1N1. This substitution was observed in a fatal case of pdmH1N1 infection in June 2009 in the Netherlands (M. Jonges et al., unpublished data). Between July and December 2009, viruses from 11 (18%) of 61 cases with severe disease outcome in Norway have also been reported to harbor the D222G substitution upon direct sequencing of HA in clinical specimens. Such mutant viruses were not observed in any of 205 mild cases investigated, and the frequency of detection of this mutation was significantly higher in severe cases than in mild cases (23). In Hong Kong, the D222G substitution was detected in 12.5% (6) and 4.1% (31) of patients with severe disease and in 0% of patients with mild disease, in two different studies without prior propagation in embryonated chicken eggs. In addition to Norway and Hong Kong, the mutation has been detected in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, Ukraine, and the United States (56). Thus, D222G in HA could be the first identified “virulence marker” of pdmH1N1. pdmH1N1 with D222G in HA have not become widespread in the population, although they were detected in several countries. However, D222G in HA is of special interest, since it has also been described as the single change in HA between two strains of the “Spanish” 1918 H1N1 virus that differed in receptor specificity (47). Furthermore, upon propagation in embryonated chicken eggs, pdmH1N1 can acquire the mutation rapidly, presumably because it results in virus adaptation to avian (α2,3-SAs) receptors (49). The presence of the substitution in pdmH1N1s in the human population and its potential association with more severe disease prompted us to test its effect on pdmH1N1 receptor binding, replication, antigenic properties, and pathogenesis and transmission in animal models.     

Receptor Specificity of Influenza A H3N2 Viruses Isolated in Mammalian Cells and Embryonated Chicken Eggs

Isolation of human subtype H3N2 influenza viruses in embryonated chicken eggs yields viruses with amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin (HA) that often affect binding to sialic acid receptors. We used a glycan array approach to analyze the repertoire of sialylated glycans recognized by viruses from the same clinical specimen isolated in eggs or cell cultures. The binding profiles of whole virions to 85 sialoglycans on the microarray allowed the categorization of cell isolates into two groups. Group 1 cell isolates displayed binding to a restricted set of α2-6 and α2-3 sialoglycans, whereas group 2 cell isolates revealed receptor specificity broader than that of their egg counterparts. Egg isolates from group 1 showed binding specificities similar to those of cell isolates, whereas group 2 egg isolates showed a significantly reduced binding to α2-6- and α2-3-type receptors but retained substantial binding to specific O- and N-linked α2-3 glycans, including α2-3GalNAc and fucosylated α2-3 glycans (including sialyl Lewis x), both of which may be important receptors for H3N2 virus replication in eggs. These results revealed an unexpected diversity in receptor binding specificities among recent H3N2 viruses, with distinct patterns of amino acid substitution in the HA occurring upon isolation and/or propagation in eggs. These findings also suggest that clinical specimens containing viruses with group 1-like receptor binding profiles would be less prone to undergoing receptor binding or antigenic changes upon isolation in eggs. Screening cell isolates for appropriate receptor binding properties might help focus efforts to isolate the most suitable viruses in eggs for production of antigenically well-matched influenza vaccines.Influenza A viruses are generally isolated and propagated in embryonated chicken eggs or in cultures of cells of mammalian origin. Human influenza viruses were previously noted to acquire mutations in the hemagglutinin (HA) gene upon isolation and culture in the allantoic sac of embryonated chicken eggs (herein simply referred to as “eggs”) compared to the sequences of those isolated in mammalian cell substrates (herein referred to as “cells”) (29, 30, 44, 53, 58). These mutations resulted in amino acid substitutions that were found to mediate receptor specificity changes and improved viral replication efficiency in eggs (37). In general, cell-grown viruses are assumed to be more similar than their egg-grown counterparts to the viruses present in respiratory secretions (30, 56). Since their emergence in 1968, influenza A (H3N2) viruses have evolved and adapted to the human host while losing their ability to be efficiently isolated and replicate in eggs, particularly after 1992 (37, 42, 48). The rate of isolation of H3N2 clinical specimens after inoculation into eggs can be up to ∼30 times lower than that in mammalian cell cultures, highlighting the strong selective pressure for the emergence of sequence variants (77).Virtually all influenza vaccines for human use were licensed decades ago by national regulatory authorities, which used a product manufactured from influenza viruses isolated and propagated exclusively in eggs; therefore, cell culture isolates have been unacceptable for this purpose (41, 71). The antigen composition of influenza vaccines requires frequent updates (every 2 years, on average) to closely match their antigenic properties to the most prevalent circulating antigenic drift variant viruses (51). The limited availability of H3N2 viruses isolated in eggs has on one or more occasions delayed vaccine composition updates and may have reduced the efficacy of vaccination against new antigenically drifted viruses (3, 34, 37).Entry of influenza viruses into host cells is mediated by HA, which binds to sialic acid containing glycoconjugates on the surface of epithelial cells in the upper respiratory tract (2, 13). The nature of the linkage between sialic acid and the vicinal sugar (usually galactose) varies in different host species and tissues and may therefore determine whether an influenza virus binds to and infects avian or human cells (40, 46, 59, 62, 72-75). Human influenza viruses preferentially bind to α2-6-linked sialic acids, and avian viruses predominantly bind to α2-3-linked sialic acids (59). Previous studies with chicken embryo chorioallantoic membranes revealed differential lectin binding, suggesting that α2-3-linked but not α2-6-linked sialosides are present on the epithelial cells (28). Human H3N2 viruses isolated in cell culture were reported to bind with a high affinity to α2-6-linked sialosides, while viruses isolated in eggs often had increased specificity for α2-3-linked sialosides (19, 20, 28). The functional classification of avian and mammalian influenza virus receptors is further complicated since in vitro and tissue-binding assays have led to new working hypotheses involving glycan chain length, topology, and the composition of the inner fragments of the carbohydrate chain as additional receptor specificity determinants (9, 17, 65, 66, 82). However, the significance of these in vitro properties remains unknown, since the structures of the natural sialosides on host cells that are used for infectious virus entry are undefined.The techniques most widely used to study the interactions of the influenza virus with host cell receptors employ animal cells in various assay formats (36, 57, 59, 64, 69). To overcome the problems of cell-based techniques, new assays that rely on labeled sialyl-glycoproteins or polymeric sialoglycans have been developed (18). However, these assays are limited by having only a few glycans available in polymeric form and offer low throughput. In contrast, glycan microarrays can assess virus binding to multiple well-defined glycans simultaneously. Previous work with influenza live or β-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated virions as well as recombinantly produced HAs revealed a good correlation with receptor specificity compared to that achieved by other methods of analysis (4, 11, 57, 58, 65-68).Here we have compared paired isolates derived in eggs or cell cultures from the single clinical specimen to better understand their receptor binding specificity and its implications for vaccine production. We examined the differences in the sequences of the HAs between egg- and cell-grown isolates and analyzed their receptor binding profiles using glycan microarrays. Sequence analysis of the HA and glycan binding results revealed two distinct groups of viruses, with many egg isolates showing unexpectedly reduced levels of binding to α2-3 and α2-6 sialosides compared to the levels for the viruses isolated in mammalian cells. Furthermore, these studies highlighted that specific glycans may be important for H3N2 virus growth in eggs.     

Interleukin-15 Is Critical in the Pathogenesis of Influenza A Virus-Induced Acute Lung Injury

Highly pathogenic influenza A viruses cause acute severe pneumonia to which the occurrence of “cytokine storm” has been proposed to contribute. Here we show that interleukin-15 (IL-15) knockout (KO) mice exhibited reduced mortality after infection with influenza virus A/FM/1/47 (H1N1, a mouse-adapted strain) albeit the viral titers of these mice showed no difference from those of control mice. There were significantly fewer antigen-specific CD44⁺ CD8⁺ T cells in the lungs of infected IL-15 KO mice, and adoptive transfer of the CD8⁺ T cells caused reduced survival of IL-15 KO mice following influenza virus infection. Mice deficient in β₂-microglobulin by gene targeting and those depleted of CD8⁺ T cells by in vivo administration of anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody displayed a reduced mortality rate after infection. These results indicate that IL-15-dependent CD8⁺ T cells are at least partly responsible for the pathogenesis of acute pneumonia caused by influenza A virus.Highly pathogenic influenza A viruses cause acute severe pneumonia that results in high morbidity and significant mortality (11, 12, 24, 26). Elevated levels of serum cytokines and chemokines accompany these clinical manifestations, and the possibility that this “cytokine storm” contributes to increased severity of the disease caused by avian H5N1 virus and by other strains of influenza A virus has been proposed (10, 21, 33). In fact, CCR2-deficient mice [CCR2 is chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2] were protected from early pathological manifestations despite higher pulmonary titers of the influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) strain (7). Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR-1)-deficient mice exhibited significantly reduced morbidity following challenge with H5N1 virus (31). Other cytokines or chemokines have also been investigated (8, 28, 34, 35, 38). Thus, at least some of the elevated proinflammatory cytokines may contribute to the pathogenesis of influenza A virus.Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in both innate and adaptive immune responses (20, 36). IL-15 utilizes the β-chain of the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) (CD122) and the common cytokine receptor γ-chain (CD132) for signal transduction in lymphocytes and therefore shares many biological properties with IL-2 (3). Memory CD8⁺ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, NKT cells, and intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) T cells (15, 23, 42) decrease in mice with defective IL-15 signaling, indicating the importance of IL-15 in their development and/or maintenance. IL-15 regulates not only the number of memory CD8⁺ T cells but also activation of their functions, including gamma interferon (IFN-γ) production and cytotoxic activity (40), which are important to target the virus (9). Therefore, it is possible that we may be able to use IL-15 as an immune-enhancing molecular adjuvant in vaccines for protection against various pathogens, including influenza A virus (37).In the present study, we demonstrate that IL-15 knockout (KO) mice exhibited high resistance against infection with mouse-adapted influenza virus A/FM/1/47 (H1N1) strain. We show for the first time that IL-15-dependent CD8⁺ T cells are at least partly responsible for the pathogenesis of acute pneumonia caused by influenza A virus. In addition, our observations are important in the light of recent research into the use of IL-15 as an adjuvant for vaccination.     

In Vitro Analysis of Virus Particle Subpopulations in Candidate Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccines Distinguishes Effective from Ineffective Vaccines

Two effective (vac⁺) and two ineffective (vac⁻) candidate live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) derived from naturally selected genetically stable variants of A/TK/OR/71-delNS1[1-124] (H7N3) that differed only in the length and kind of amino acid residues at the C terminus of the nonstructural NS1 protein were analyzed for their content of particle subpopulations. These subpopulations included total physical particles (measured as hemagglutinating particles [HAPs]) with their subsumed biologically active particles of infectious virus (plaque-forming particles [PFPs]) and different classes of noninfectious virus, namely, interferon-inducing particles (IFPs), noninfectious cell-killing particles (niCKPs), and defective interfering particles (DIPs). The vac⁺ variants were distinguished from the vac⁻ variants on the basis of their content of viral subpopulations by (i) the capacity to induce higher quantum yields of interferon (IFN), (ii) the generation of an unusual type of IFN-induction dose-response curve, (iii) the presence of IFPs that induce IFN more efficiently, (iv) reduced sensitivity to IFN action, and (v) elevated rates of PFP replication that resulted in larger plaques and higher PFP and HAP titers. These in vitro analyses provide a benchmark for the screening of candidate LAIVs and their potential as effective vaccines. Vaccine design may be improved by enhancement of attributes that are dominant in the effective (vac⁺) vaccines.Live-attenuated vaccines are considered more effective than their inactive or single-component counterparts because they activate both the innate and adaptive immune systems and elicit responses to a broader range of antigens for longer periods of time (2, 10, 25, 28). Influenza virus variants with alterations in the reading frame of the nonstructural NS1 protein gene (delNS1), which express truncated NS1 proteins, characteristically induce enhanced yields of type I interferon (IFN) relative to the yields of their isogenic parental virus encoding full-length NS1 proteins (11, 13, 21, 33, 39). Many of these delNS1 variants have proved to be effective as live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs), providing protection against challenge virus in a broad range of species (33, 46), including chickens (39, 44). The IFN-inducing capacity of the virus is considered an important element in the effectiveness of LAIVs (33). In that context, influenza viruses are intrinsically sensitive to the antiviral action of IFN (31, 32, 36), although they may display a nongenetic-based transient resistance (36). In addition, IFN sensitizes cells to the initiation of apoptosis by viruses (42) and by double-stranded RNA (40), which may be spontaneously released in the course of influenza virus replication (14). Furthermore, IFN functions as an adjuvant to boost the adaptive immune response in mammals (3, 4, 11, 26, 41, 43, 46) and in chickens when administered perorally in the drinking water of influenza virus-infected birds (19). This raises the question: does the enhanced induction of IFN by delNS1 variants suffice to render an infectious influenza virus preparation sufficiently attenuated to function as an effective live vaccine? To address that question, we turned to a recent report that described the selection of several variants of influenza virus with a common backbone of A/TK/OR/71-SEPRL (Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory) that contained NS1 protein genes which were unusual in the length and nature of the amino acid residues at the C termini of the truncated NS1 proteins that they expressed because of the natural introduction of a frameshift and stop codon by the deletion in the NS1 protein gene (44). delNS1 variants were isolated from serial low-inoculum passages of TK/OR/71-delNS1[1-124] (H7N3) in eggs (44). Four of these genetically stable plaque-purified variants, each encoding a truncated NS1 protein of a particular length, were tested as a candidate LAIV in 2-week-old chickens. Two of the delNS1 variants were effective as live vaccines (double deletions [D-del] pc3 and pc4) (phenotypically vac⁺), and two were not (D-del pc1 and pc2) (phenotypically vac⁻) (44), despite only subtle differences in their encoded delNS1 proteins. Why were they phenotypically different?The present study addresses this question by analyzing and comparing the different virus particles that constitute the subpopulations of these two effective (vac⁺) and two ineffective (vac⁻) live vaccine candidates. These analyses are based on recent reports in which noninfectious but biologically active particles (niBAPs) in subpopulations of influenza virus particles were defined and quantified (20, 21, 29). The study described in this report reveals several quantitative and qualitative differences between the particle subpopulations of the four candidate LAIVs, including the different types of IFN-induction dose-response curves, the quantum (maximum) yields (QY) of IFN induced, the efficacy of the interferon-inducing particles (IFPs), the replication efficiency of the virus, and the size of the plaques that they produced. Evidence is presented that the in vitro analysis of virus particle subpopulations may be useful to distinguish vac⁺ from vac⁻ LAIV candidates and provide a basis for identifying and enhancing the performance of particles with desirable phenotypes.     

Ocular Infection of Mice with Influenza A (H7) Viruses: a Site of Primary Replication and Spread to the Respiratory Tract

Avian H7 influenza viruses have been responsible for poultry outbreaks worldwide and have resulted in numerous cases of human infection in recent years. The high rate of conjunctivitis associated with avian H7 subtype virus infections may represent a portal of entry for avian influenza viruses and highlights the need to better understand the apparent ocular tropism observed in humans. To study this, mice were inoculated by the ocular route with viruses of multiple subtypes and degrees of virulence. We found that in contrast to human (H3N2 and H1N1) viruses, H7N7 viruses isolated from The Netherlands in 2003 and H7N3 viruses isolated from British Columbia, Canada, in 2004, two subtypes that were highly virulent for poultry, replicated to a significant titer in the mouse eye. Remarkably, an H7N7 virus, as well as some avian H5N1 viruses, spread systemically following ocular inoculation, including to the brain, resulting in morbidity and mortality of mice. This correlated with efficient replication of highly pathogenic H7 and H5 subtypes in murine corneal epithelial sheets (ex vivo) and primary human corneal epithelial cells (in vitro). Influenza viruses were labeled to identify the virus attachment site in the mouse cornea. Although we found abundant H7 virus attachment to corneal epithelial tissue, this did not account for the differences in virus replication as multiple subtypes were able to attach to these cells. These findings demonstrate that avian influenza viruses within H7 and H5 subtypes are capable of using the eye as a portal of entry.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 viruses, which have resulted in over 420 documented cases of human infection to date, have generally caused acute, often severe and fatal, respiratory illness (1, 50). While conjunctivitis following infection with H5N1 or human influenza viruses has been rare, most human infections associated with H7 subtype viruses have resulted in ocular and not respiratory disease (1, 9, 37, 38). Infrequent reports of human conjunctivitis infection following exposure to H7 influenza viruses date from 1977, predominantly resulting from laboratory or occupational exposure (21, 40, 48). However, in The Netherlands in 2003, more than 80 human infections with H7N7 influenza virus occurred among poultry farmers and cullers amid widespread outbreaks of HPAI in domestic poultry; the majority of these human infections resulted in conjunctivitis (14, 20). Additionally, conjunctivitis was documented in the two human infections resulting from an H7N3 outbreak in British Columbia, Canada, in 2004, as well as in H7N3- and H7N2-infected individuals in the United Kingdom in 2006 and 2007, respectively (13, 18, 29, 46, 51). The properties that contribute to an apparent ocular tropism of some influenza viruses are currently not well understood (30).Host cell glycoproteins bearing sialic acids (SAs) are the cellular receptors for influenza viruses and can be found on epithelial cells within both the human respiratory tract and ocular tissue (26, 31, 41). Both respiratory and ocular tissues additionally secrete sialylated mucins that function in pathogen defense and protection of the epithelial surface (5, 11, 22). Within the upper respiratory tract, α2-6-linked SAs (the preferred receptor for human influenza viruses) predominate on epithelial cells (26). While α2-3-linked SAs are also present to a lesser degree on respiratory epithelial cells, this linkage is more abundantly expressed on secreted mucins (2). In contrast, α2-3-linked SAs (the preferred receptor for avian influenza viruses) are found on corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells of the human eye (31, 41), while secreted ocular mucins are abundantly composed of α2-6 SAs (5). It has been suggested that avian influenza viruses are more suited to infect the ocular surface due to their general α2-3-linked SA binding preference, but this has not been demonstrated experimentally (30).The mouse model has been used previously to study the role of ocular exposure to respiratory viruses (6, 39). In mice, ocular inoculation with an H3N2 influenza virus resulted in virus replication in nasal turbinates and lung (39), whereas ocular infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) resulted in detectable virus titers in the eye and lung (6). These studies have revealed that respiratory viruses are not limited to the ocular area following inoculation at this site. However, the ability of influenza viruses to replicate specifically within ocular tissue has not been examined.Despite repeated instances of conjunctivitis associated with H7 subtype infections in humans, the reasons for this apparent ocular tropism have not been studied extensively. Here, we present a murine model to study the ability of human and avian influenza viruses to cause disease by the ocular route. We found that highly pathogenic H7 and H5 influenza viruses were capable of causing a systemic and lethal infection in mice following ocular inoculation. These highly pathogenic viruses, unlike human H3N2 and H1N1 viruses, replicated to significant titers in the mouse corneal epithelium and primary human corneal epithelial cells (HCEpiCs). Identification of viruses well suited to infecting the ocular surface is the first step in better understanding the ability of influenza viruses of multiple subtypes to use this tissue as a portal of entry.     

Lack of Bax Prevents Influenza A Virus-Induced Apoptosis and Causes Diminished Viral Replication

The ectopic overexpression of Bcl-2 restricts both influenza A virus-induced apoptosis and influenza A virus replication in MDCK cells, thus suggesting a role for Bcl-2 family members during infection. Here we report that influenza A virus cannot establish an apoptotic response without functional Bax, a downstream target of Bcl-2, and that both Bax and Bak are directly involved in influenza A virus replication and virus-induced cell death. Bak is substantially downregulated during influenza A virus infection in MDCK cells, and the knockout of Bak in mouse embryonic fibroblasts yields a dramatic rise in the rate of apoptotic death and a corresponding increase in levels of virus replication, suggesting that Bak suppresses both apoptosis and the replication of virus and that the virus suppresses Bak. Bax, however, is activated and translocates from the cytosol to the mitochondria; this activation is required for the efficient induction of apoptosis and virus replication. The knockout of Bax in mouse embryonic fibroblasts blocks the induction of apoptosis, restricts the infection-mediated activation of executioner caspases, and inhibits virus propagation. Bax knockout cells still die but by an alternative death pathway displaying characteristics of autophagy, similarly to our previous observation that influenza A virus infection in the presence of a pancaspase inhibitor leads to an increase in levels of autophagy. The knockout of Bax causes a retention of influenza A virus NP within the nucleus. We conclude that the cell and virus struggle to control apoptosis and autophagy, as appropriately timed apoptosis is important for the replication of influenza A virus.The pathology of influenza A virus infection usually arises from acute lymphopenia and inflammation of the lungs and airway columnar epithelial cells (23, 38). Influenza A virus induces apoptotic death in infected epithelial, lymphocyte, and phagocytic cells, and apoptosis is a source of tissue damage during infection (3, 22, 33) and increased susceptibility to bacterial pathogens postinfection (31). While the induction of apoptosis by influenza A virus has been well documented (4, 19-21, 28, 33, 37), the mechanisms of this interaction are not well understood. Two viral proteins, NS1 and PB1-F2, have been associated with viral killing of cells. NS1, originally characterized as being proapoptotic (34), was later identified as being an interferon antagonist, inhibiting the activation of several key antiviral responses and restricting the apoptotic response to infection (1, 10, 15, 18, 35, 39, 46). In contrast, PB1-F2 induces apoptosis primarily by localizing to the outer mitochondrial membrane, promoting cytochrome c release, and triggering the apoptotic cascade (43). This effect, however, is typically restricted to infected monocytes, leading to the hypothesis that PB1-F2 induces apoptosis specifically to clear the landscape of immune responders (5, 44). Although PB1-F2 activity does not directly manipulate virus replication or virus-induced apoptosis, PB1-F2 localization to the mitochondrial membrane during infection potentiates the apoptotic response in epithelial and fibroblastic cells through tBID signaling with proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein members Bax and Bak (22, 43, 44).The Bcl-2 protein family consists of both pro- and antiapoptotic members that regulate cytochrome c release during mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis through the formation of pore-like channels in the outer mitochondrial membrane (12, 16). During the initiation of mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis, cytoplasmic Bid is cleaved to form tBID. This, in turn, activates proapoptotic Bax and Bak (40), which drive cytochrome c release and subsequent caspase activation. Bak is constitutively associated with the mitochondrial membrane, whereas inactive Bax is primarily cytosolic, translocating to the outer mitochondrial membrane only after activation (6). The activation of Bax and Bak results in homo- and heterodimer formation at the outer mitochondrial membrane, generating pores that facilitate mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and cytochrome c release (14, 17), leading to caspase activation and the apoptotic cascade (8). Antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 protein family, including Bcl-2, inhibit the activation of proapoptotic Bax and Bak primarily by sequestering inactive Bax and Bak monomers via interactions between their BH3 homology domains (7).Bcl-2 expression has been linked to decreased viral replication rates (26). Bcl-2 overexpression inhibits influenza A virus-induced cell death and reduces the titer and spread of newly formed virions (29). The activation of caspase-3 in the absence of sufficient Bcl-2 is critical to the influenza A virus life cycle. Both Bcl-2 expression and the lack of caspase activation during infection lead to the nuclear accumulation of influenza virus ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, thereby leading to the improper assembly of progeny virions and a marked reduction in titers of infectious virus (26, 41, 42, 45).Here we show that influenza A virus induces mitochondrion-mediated (intrinsic-pathway) apoptosis signaled specifically through Bax and that this Bax signaling is essential for the maximum efficiency of virus propagation. In contrast, Bak expression is strongly downregulated during infection. Cells lacking Bak (while expressing Bax) display a much more severe apoptotic phenotype in response to infection and produce infectious virions at a higher rate than the wild type (WT), suggesting that Bak, which can suppress viral replication, is potentially downregulated by the virus. Our results indicate essential and opposing roles for Bax and Bak in both the response of cells to influenza A virus infection and the ability of the virus to maximize its own replicative potential.