Role of Septins in the Orientation of Forespore Membrane Extension during Sporulation in Fission Yeast

During yeast sporulation, a forespore membrane (FSM) initiates at each spindle-pole body and extends to form the spore envelope. We used Schizosaccharomyces pombe to investigate the role of septins during this process. During the prior conjugation of haploid cells, the four vegetatively expressed septins (Spn1, Spn2, Spn3, and Spn4) coassemble at the fusion site and are necessary for its normal morphogenesis. Sporulation involves a different set of four septins (Spn2, Spn5, Spn6, and the atypical Spn7) that does not include the core subunits of the vegetative septin complex. The four sporulation septins form a complex in vitro and colocalize interdependently to a ring-shaped structure along each FSM, and septin mutations result in disoriented FSM extension. The septins and the leading-edge proteins appear to function in parallel to orient FSM extension. Spn2 and Spn7 bind to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate [PtdIns(4)P] in vitro, and PtdIns(4)P is enriched in the FSMs, suggesting that septins bind to the FSMs via this lipid. Cells expressing a mutant Spn2 protein unable to bind PtdIns(4)P still form extended septin structures, but these structures fail to associate with the FSMs, which are frequently disoriented. Thus, septins appear to form a scaffold that helps to guide the oriented extension of the FSM.Yeast sporulation is a developmental process that involves multiple, sequential events that need to be tightly coordinated (59, 68). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, when cells of opposite mating type (h⁺ and h⁻) are mixed and shifted to conditions of nitrogen starvation, cell fusion and karyogamy occur to form a diploid zygote, which then undergoes premeiotic DNA replication, the two meiotic divisions, formation of the spore envelopes (comprising the plasma membrane and a specialized cell wall), and maturation of the spores (74, 81). At the onset of meiosis II, precursors of the spore envelopes, the forespore membranes (FSMs), are formed by the fusion of vesicles at the cytoplasmic surface of each spindle-pole body (SPB) and then extend to engulf the four nuclear lobes (the nuclear envelope does not break down during meiosis), thus capturing the haploid nuclei, along with associated cytoplasm and organelles, to form the nascent spores (55, 68, 81). How the FSMs recognize and interact with the nuclear envelope, extend in a properly oriented manner, and close to form uniformly sized spherical spores is not understood, and study of this model system should also help to elucidate the more general question of how membranes obtain their shapes in vivo.It has been shown that both the SPB and the vesicle trafficking system play important roles in the formation and development of the FSM and of its counterpart in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the prospore membrane (PSM). In S. pombe, the SPB changes its shape from a compact dot to a crescent at metaphase of meiosis II (26, 29), and its outer plaque acquires meiosis-specific components such as Spo2, Spo13, and Spo15 (30, 57, 68). This modified outer plaque is required for the initiation of FSM assembly. In S. cerevisiae, it is well established that various secretory (SEC) gene products are required for PSM formation (58, 59). Similarly, proteins presumably involved in the docking and/or fusion of post-Golgi vesicles and organelles in S. pombe, such as the syntaxin-1A Psy1, the SNAP-25 homologue Sec9, and the Rab7 GTPase homologue Ypt7, are also required for proper FSM extension (34, 53, 54). Consistent with this hypothesis, Psy1 disappears from the plasma membrane upon exit from meiosis I and reappears in the nascent FSM.Phosphoinositide-mediated membrane trafficking also contributes to the development of the FSM. Pik3/Vps34 is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase whose product is phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P] (35, 72). S. pombe cells lacking this protein exhibit defects in various steps of FSM formation, such as aberrant starting positions for extension, disoriented extension and/or failure of closure, and the formation of spore-like bodies near, rather than surrounding, the nuclei, suggesting that Pik3 plays multiple roles during sporulation (61). The targets of PtdIns(3)P during sporulation appear to include two sorting nexins, Vps5 and Vps17, and the FYVE domain-containing protein Sst4/Vps27. vps5Δ and vps17Δ mutant cells share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells (38). sst4Δ cells also share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells but are distinct from vps5Δ and vps17Δ cells, consistent with the hypothesis that Pik3 has multiple roles during sporulation (62).Membrane trafficking processes alone do not seem sufficient to explain how the FSMs and PSMs extend around and engulf the nuclei, suggesting that some other mechanism(s) must regulate and orient FSM/PSM extension. The observation that the FSM is attached to the SPB until formation of the immature spore is complete (68) suggests that the SPB may regulate FSM extension. In addition, the leading edge of the S. cerevisiae PSM is coated with a complex of proteins (the LEPs) that appear to be involved in PSM extension (51, 59). S. pombe Meu14 also localizes to the leading edge of the FSM, and deletion of meu14 causes aberrant FSM formation in addition to a failure in SPB modification (60). However, it has remained unclear whether the SPB- and LEP-based mechanisms are sufficient to account for the formation of closed FSMs and PSMs of proper size and position (relative to the nuclear envelope), and evidence from S. cerevisiae has suggested that the septin proteins may also be involved.The septins are a conserved family of GTP-binding proteins that were first identified in S. cerevisiae by analysis of the cytokinesis-defective cdc3, cdc10, cdc11, and cdc12 mutants (41). Cdc3, Cdc10, Cdc11, and Cdc12 are related to each other in sequence and form an oligomeric complex that localizes to a ring in close apposition to the plasma membrane at the mother-bud neck in vegetative cells (12, 20, 25, 41, 47, 77). The septin ring appears to be filamentous in vivo (12), and indeed, the septins from both yeast (11, 20) and metazoans (31, 36, 69) can form filaments in vitro. The yeast septin ring appears to form a scaffold for the localization and organization of a wide variety of other proteins (8, 22), and it forms a diffusion barrier that constrains movement of membrane proteins through the neck region (7, 8, 73). In metazoan cells, the septins are involved in cytokinesis but are also implicated in a variety of other cellular processes, such as vesicular transport, organization of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, and oncogenesis (27, 70).In S. cerevisiae, a fifth septin (Shs1) is also expressed in vegetative cells, but the remaining two septin genes, SPR3 and SPR28, are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (15, 17). In addition, at least some of the vegetatively expressed septins are also present in sporulating cells (17, 48), and one of them (Cdc10) is expressed at much higher levels there than in vegetative cells (32). The septins present during sporulation are associated with the PSM (15, 17, 48, 51), and their normal organization there depends on the Gip1-Glc7 protein phosphatase complex (71). However, it has been difficult to gain insight into the precise roles of the septins during sporulation in S. cerevisiae (59), because some septins are essential for viability during vegetative growth, and the viable mutants have only mild phenotypes during sporulation (15, 17), possibly because of functional redundancy among the multiple septins.S. pombe seemed likely to provide a better opportunity for investigating the role of septins during spore formation. There are seven septin genes (spn1⁺ to spn7⁺) in this organism (23, 41, 63). Four of these genes (spn1⁺ to spn4⁺) are expressed in vegetative cells, and their products form a hetero-oligomeric complex that assembles during cytokinesis into a ring at the division site (2, 3, 10, 76, 79). The septin ring is important for proper targeting of endoglucanases to the division site (44), and septin mutants show a corresponding delay in cell separation (10, 41, 44, 76). However, even the spn1Δ spn2Δ spn3Δ spn4Δ quadruple mutant is viable and grows nearly as rapidly as the wild type (our unpublished results), a circumstance that greatly facilitates studies of the septins'' role during sporulation.spn5⁺, spn6⁺, and spn7⁺ are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (1, 45, 78; our unpublished results), and spn2⁺, like its orthologue CDC10 (see above), is strongly induced (45), but the roles of the S. pombe septins in sporulation have not previously been investigated. In this study, we show that the septins are important for the orientation of FSM extension, suggesting that the septins may have a more general role in dynamic membrane organization and shape determination.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate and Phospholipase D-Generated Phosphatidic Acid Specify SNARE-Mediated Vesicle Fusion for Prospore Membrane Formation

The soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) family of proteins is required for eukaryotic intracellular membrane fusions. Vesicle fusion for formation of the prospore membrane (PSM), a membrane compartment that forms de novo during yeast sporulation, requires SNARE function, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂], and the activity of the phospholipase D (PLD) Spo14p, which generates phosphatidic acid (PA). The SNARE syntaxin Sso1p is essential for PSM production while the functionally redundant homolog in vegetative growth, Sso2p, is not. We demonstrate that Sso1p and Sso2p bind similarly in vitro to PA or phosphoinositide-containing liposomes and that the conserved SNARE (H3) domain largely mediates PA-binding. Both green fluorescent protein-Sso fusion proteins localize to the developing PSM in wild-type cells and to the spindle pole body in spo14Δ cells induced to sporulate. However, the autoregulatory region of Sso1p binds PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes in vitro with a greater ability than the equivalent region of Sso2p. Overexpression of the phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase MSS4 in sso1Δ cells induced to sporulate stimulates PSM production; PLD activity is not increased under these conditions, indicating that PI(4,5)P₂ has roles in addition to stimulating PLD in PSM formation. These data suggest that PLD-generated PA and PI(4,5)P₂ collaborate at multiple levels to promote SNARE-mediated fusion for PSM formation.The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) family of proteins is required for the fusion of vesicles to target membranes in eukaryotic cells (53). The process of SNARE-mediated fusion is both structurally and mechanistically similar in different intracellular transport pathways and is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human (18, 31, 34). In vitro experiments demonstrated that SNAREs have the ability to effect fusions of liposomes in the absence of other components, indicating that these proteins directly mediate the fusion event (56). SNAREs can be broadly categorized as either vesicle SNAREs (v-SNAREs) or target membrane SNAREs (t-SNAREs), respectively. The interaction of SNAREs on apposed membranes can overcome the energy barrier generated by charged headgroups of lipids comprising the bilayers. As an incoming vesicle approaches its target membrane, the v-SNAREs and t-SNAREs assemble via their SNARE domains into a four-helix bundle termed a SNAREpin, bringing the two bilayers into closer proximity (3, 55, 56). The outer membrane layers of both the vesicle and target membrane mix, forming a hemifusion intermediate before full fusion of the membranes occurs (23, 24, 29, 58).The helices comprising the SNAREpin are supplied by three different SNARE subfamilies. Two of these subfamily members, syntaxin and SNAP-25, are t-SNAREs; the former contributes one helix while the latter contributes two helices (16). The syntaxin and SNAP-25 homologs heterodimerize to form the t-SNARE complex before the trans-interaction with the helix of vesicle-associated membrane protein/synaptobrevin v-SNARE (42). Discrete intracellular fusion events are mediated by SNAREpins comprising different constituent syntaxin, SNAP-25, and vesicle-associated membrane protein homologs (18, 53).In addition to SNAREs, lipids facilitate membrane fusion events for both membrane curvature induction required for procession through intermediate states of fusion and direct regulation of SNARE molecules (32, 33). Cone-shaped lipids such as diacylglycerol and phosphatidic acid (PA) induce negative (concave) curvature while inverted cone shapes, such as lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), have the opposite effect (26, 27). The assembly of SNARE complexes requires correct lipid composition at the fusion site; addition of inverted cone-shaped lipids antagonized in vitro SNARE complex assembly (35). Recent studies have shown that phosphatidylinositides also play roles in SNARE-mediated fusions. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate [PI(3)P] interacts with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNARE Vam7p via its phox homology domain and appears to facilitate targeting to the vacuole (15). Additionally, phosphoinositides increased the rates of in vitro fusion of proteoliposomes that approximated physiological protein and lipids in vivo (36). Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂] was shown to bind to the juxtamembrane region of syntaxin-1 in PC12 cells and has both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on in vitro fusion rates (20).The activity of the lipid-modifying enzyme phospholipase D (PLD) also appears to be important for vesicle fusions. PLD catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine (PC) to PA in a PI(4,5)P₂-dependent manner (22, 49). In S. cerevisiae, PLD activity is required for the de novo formation of a novel compartment, the prospore membrane (PSM), during sporulation (48). Vesicles trafficked from the Golgi and endosomal compartments dock at the spindle pole body (SPB) and participate in SNARE-mediated fusions for PSM formation (38, 40, 41). Cells induced to sporulate that lack the yeast PLD Spo14p show docked but unfused vesicles at the SPB (40, 44). Interestingly, cells lacking Sso1p, a syntaxin functionally redundant with Sso2p at the plasma membrane (PM), display a similar phenotype while sso2Δ cells display no sporulation defect (2, 21, 40). The specific requirement for Sso1p in sporulation is not fully understood although the Sso1p autoregulatory Habc motif is important (43).In this study, we demonstrate that Sso1p acts downstream of Spo14p (PLD)-generated PA during PSM formation. Sso1p and Sso2p bind PA and additional phosphoinositide species; PA binding is mediated by the conserved H3 motif. Additionally, the Sso1p Habc domain shows a greater ability to interact with PIP₂-containing liposomes in vitro than the equivalent region of Sso2p. Overexpression of the PI(4)P 5-kinase Mss4p results in PSM formation in sso1Δ cells induced to sporulate. Together, these data indicate that both PA and PI(4,5)P₂ are required for efficient fusion and furthermore suggest a novel role for PI(4,5)P₂ in the regulation of specialized SNARE fusion events.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Protein Phosphatase Type 1-Interacting Protein Ysw1 Is Involved in Proper Septin Organization and Prospore Membrane Formation during Sporulation

Sporulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a developmental process in which four haploid spores are generated inside a diploid cell. Gip1, a sporulation-specific targeting subunit of protein phosphatase type 1, together with its catalytic subunit, Glc7, colocalizes with septins along the extending prospore membrane and is required for septin organization and spore wall formation. However, the mechanism by which Gip1-Glc7 phosphatase promotes these events is unclear. We show here that Ysw1, a sporulation-specific coiled-coil protein, has a functional relationship to Gip1-Glc7 phosphatase. Overexpression of YSW1 partially suppresses the sporulation defect of a temperature-sensitive allele of gip1. Ysw1 interacts with Gip1 in a two-hybrid assay, and this interaction is required for suppression. Ysw1 tagged with green fluorescent protein colocalizes with septins and Gip1 along the extending prospore membrane during spore formation. Sporulation is partially defective in ysw1Δ mutant, and cytological analysis revealed that septin structures are perturbed and prospore membrane extension is aberrant in ysw1Δ cells. These results suggest that Ysw1 functions with the Gip1-Glc7 phosphatase to promote proper septin organization and prospore membrane formation.Diploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to nitrogen limitation in the presence of a nonfermentable carbon source undergo the developmental process of sporulation (14, 23, 35). Four nuclei produced by two rounds of nuclear division, meiosis I and II, are encapsulated by newly formed double-membrane structures, called prospore membranes, and are finally packaged into spores covered with layered spore walls (35).In this process, prospore membrane formation is one of the most dynamic events. Early in meiosis II, the cytoplasmic surface of the meiotic spindle pole body (SPB) is modified by the recruitment of sporulation-specific protein complex that acts as a site of vesicle recruitment (2, 22, 39). Post-Golgi secretory vesicles dock to the surface of the SPBs and fuse with each other, generating prospore membranes (33, 34). The prospore membranes then grow to engulf daughter nuclei through a series of stages that are categorized by the membranes'' appearance in the fluorescence microscope (12). Initially, the membranes appear as small horseshoes that enlarge to become small round membrane structures. The prospore membranes then extend into a tube-like shape, engulfing the nucleus, as well as some cytosol and organelles (12). After this extension, prospore membrane undergoes a rapid change to a mature round form. This rounding of the membrane is coordinated with membrane closure (12). Spore wall materials are then deposited into the luminal space created by closure of the prospore membrane (9).In addition to the meiotic plaque of the SPB, two protein complexes are associated with the prospore membrane as it forms. One is the leading edge protein complex, which exists at the lip of the prospore membranes and consists of three components: Ssp1, Ady3, and Don1 (27, 30, 38). Ssp1 is the most important of the three and is required for proper extension of the prospore membrane (30). The second complex is a sporulation-specific septin structure. The septins are a family of cytoskeletal proteins, which form filaments (18, 50). Septins are conserved from yeast to mammals. They were originally found and have been extensively studied in S. cerevisiae. In vegetatively growing S. cerevisiae cells, five septin proteins—Cdc3, Cdc10, Cdc11, Cdc12, and Shs1—form a ring at the bud neck that serves as a scaffold for many additional proteins, as well as a barrier to diffusion of proteins between the mother and the bud (19, 29, 50). In sporulating cells, the set of septin proteins is changed. Cdc3 and Cdc10, along with two sporulation-specific septins, Spr3 and Spr28, form a pair of parallel bars or sheets associated with each prospore membrane (11, 15, 29). Although deletion of sporulation-specific septins has only modest effects on sporulation (11, 15), their specific localization suggests that they have some function during prospore membrane formation. Septin organization in vegetatively growing cells is regulated by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of septin components and septin-associated proteins (29). In sporulating cells, a sporulation-specific protein phosphatase type 1 (PP1) complex Gip1-Glc7 is required for the formation of septin structures (46), although whether this phosphatase acts directly on the septin proteins is unknown.The PP1 catalytic subunit is highly conserved in eukaryotes and is involved in a variety of cellular processes (8, 44). In S. cerevisiae it is encoded by an essential gene, GLC7, and functions in glycogen synthesis, glucose repression, chromosome segregation, cell wall organization, endocytosis, mating, and sporulation (3, 17, 24, 42, 44, 47, 53). The specificity of this enzyme is determined by targeting subunits. GIP1 was originally isolated in a two-hybrid screen by using GLC7 as a bait, and this interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation of the two proteins (48). GIP1 is a sporulation-specific gene required for sporulation. Further analysis revealed that Gip1 and Glc7 colocalize with septins during sporulation and are required for both septin organization and spore wall formation (46). The specific targets or cofactors of this PP1 complex are unknown.To elucidate the role of Gip1-Glc7 phosphatase, we screened for high-copy suppressors of a temperature-sensitive allele of gip1 and isolated YSW1. Ysw1 interacts with Gip1 and colocalizes with septins similar to Gip1. Furthermore, a ysw1Δ mutant displays aberrant septin structures and prospore membrane extension. These results suggest that Ysw1 may function with Gip1-Glc7 to regulate proper septin organization and prospore membrane formation.