Circadian rhythms

The neurobiological substratum of circadian rhythmicity encompasses three levels of integration: firstly, generation of time signals by circadian pacemakers; secondly, entrainment of pacemakers by environmental influences; thirdly, coupling of circadian pacemakers among themselves and with target systems responsible for the expression of overt rhythms. From recent contributions, the notion that circadian organization results from the interaction of independent oscillators and pathways has been strengthened. In addition, recent evidence supports the existence of circadian rhythmicity in single isolated neurons. New information was produced on the gene control of circadian rhythm generation in Drosophila, as well as interesting advances in the understanding of neuronal mechanisms involved in the generation, entrainment and coupling of circadian rhythms in various species.     

Circadian complexes: Circadian rhythms under common gene control

Summary Circadian rhythms for food and water consumption were measured in five inbred strains of mice under a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark (16:8 LD), and under constant light (LL).Significant strain differences were observed which indicate that a common gene difference, or set of differences inMus musculus influences both the phase angle () associating the rhythms with the light-dark cycle, and the periods (_LL) of circadian rhythms for food and water consumption. The biological clock mechanism influenced by this genetic variance is common to both food and water circadian rhythms, and differs among the five inbred strains. A positive genetic correlation was observed between the phase angle () and the period (_LL) of each rhythm. This observation can be understood in terms of a functional relationship between phase and period proposed by Pittendrigh and Daan (1976b) for the entrainment of a circadian oscillator by a light-dark cycle in nocturnal rodents.These results suggest that circadian rhythms for food and water consumption in mice are regulated by a common physiological mechanism, and would respond to natural selection as a single circadian complex under common gene control.     

Circadian physiological rhythms

Mammals show numerous circadian rhythms, some exogenous but nonetheless useful, some endogenous. Even in the absence of exogenous synchronizers, different physiological functions usually preserve their normal temporal relations, suggesting that a single clock controls most or all of the rhythmic manifestations. The role of adrenal corticosteroids and of temperature as means whereby the clock influences other functions is considered.     

Entrainment of Circadian Programs

Circadian rhythms were recently proposed as a measure of physiological state and prognosis in disorders of consciousness (DOC). So far, melatonin regulation was never assessed in vegetative state (VS). Aim of our research was to investigate the nocturnal melatonin levels and light-induced melatonin suppression in a cohort of VS patients. We assessed six consecutive patients (four men, age 33.3?±?9.3 years) with post-traumatic VS and nine age-matched healthy volunteers (five men, age 34.3?±?8.9 years) on two consecutive nights: one baseline and one light exposure night. During baseline, night subjects were in bed in a dim (<5?lux) room from 10?pm to 8?am. Blood samples were collected hourly 00:30–3:30?am (00:30?=?MLT1; 1:30?=?MLT2; 2:30?=?MLT3; and 3:30?=?MLT4). Identical setting was used for melatonin suppression test night, except for the exposure to monochromatic (470?nm) light from 1:30 to 3:30?am. Plasma melatonin levels were evaluated by radioimmunoassay. Magnitude of melatonin suppression was assessed by melatonin suppression score (caMSS) and suppression rate. We searched for group differences in melatonin levels, differences between repeated samples melatonin concentrations during baseline night and light exposure night, and light-induced suppression of melatonin secretion. During baseline night, controls showed an increase of melatonin (MLT4 vs MLT1, p?=?0.037), while no significant changes were observed in VS melatonin levels (p?=?0.172). Baseline night MLT4 was significantly lower in VS vs controls (p?=?0.036). During light-exposure night, controls displayed a significant suppression of melatonin (MLT3 and MLT4 vs MLT2, p?=?0.016 and 0.002, respectively), while VS patients displayed no significant changes. The magnitude of light-induced suppression of melatonin levels was statistically different between groups considering control adjusted caMSS (p?=?0.000), suppression rate (p?=?0.002) and absolute percentage difference (p?=?0.012). These results demonstrate for the first time that VS patients present an alteration in night melatonin secretion and reduced light-induced melatonin suppression. These findings confirm previous studies demonstrating a disruption of the circadian system in DOC and suggest a possible benefit from melatonin supplementation in VS.     

Genetics of Circadian Clocks

The isolation of circadian clock mutants in Neurospora crassa and Drosophila melanogaster have identified numerous genes whose function is necessary for the normal operation of the circadian clock. In Neurospora many of these mutants map to a single locus called frq, whose properties suggest that its gene product is intimately involved in clock function. In Drosophila mutations at the per locus also suggest a significant role for the product of this gene in the insect clock mechanism. The per gene has been cloned and its gene product identified as a proteoglycan, most likely a membrane protein involved in affecting the ionic or electrical properties of cells in which it is located. Future progress in elucidating the mechanisms of circadian clocks are likely to come from continued analysis of clock mutants, both at the genetic and molecular levels.     

Circadian photoreceptor organs inLimulus

The circadian rhythm in the ERG amplitude of the lateral compound eye ofLimulus can be phase shifted either by general illumination or by illuminating combinations of the photoreceptor organs.

Circadian control of neurogenesis

The life-long addition of new neurons has been documented in many regions of the vertebrate and invertebrate brain, including the hippocampus of mammals (Altman and Das, 1965; Eriksson et al., 1998; Jacobs et al., 2000), song control nuclei of birds (Alvarez-Buylla et al., 1990), and olfactory pathway of rodents (Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1994), insects (Cayre et al., 1996) and crustaceans (Harzsch and Dawirs, 1996; Sandeman et al., 1998; Harzsch et al., 1999; Schmidt, 2001). The possibility of persistent neurogenesis in the neocortex of primates is also being widely discussed (Gould et al., 1999; Kornack and Rakic, 2001). In these systems, an effort is underway to understand the regulatory mechanisms that control the timing and rate of neurogenesis. Hormonal cycles (Rasika et al., 1994; Harrison et al., 2001), serotonin (Gould, 1999; Brezun and Daszuta, 2000; Beltz et al., 2001), physical activity (Van Praag et al., 1999) and living conditions (Kemperman and Gage, 1999; Sandeman and Sandeman, 2000) influence the rate of neuronal proliferation and survival in a variety of organisms, suggesting that mechanisms controlling life-long neurogenesis are conserved across a range of vertebrate and invertebrate species. The present article extends these findings by demonstrating circadian control of neurogenesis. Data show a diurnal rhythm of neurogenesis among the olfactory projection neurons in the crustacean brain, with peak proliferation during the hours surrounding dusk, the most active period for lobsters. These data raise the possibility that light-controlled rhythms are a primary regulator of neuronal proliferation, and that previously-demonstrated hormonal and activity-driven influences over neurogenesis may be secondary events in a complex circadian control pathway.     

Circadian clocks in prokaryotes

Prokaryotes have long been thought incapable of expressing circadian (daily) rhythms. Recently, however, such biological 'clocks' have been discovered in several species of cyanobacteria. These endogenous timekeepers control gene expression on a global level in cyanobacteria. Even in cyanobacterial cultures that are growing with average doubling times more rapid than one per 24 h, the circadian clock controls gene expression and cell division. We have isolated mutants of the cyanobacterial circadian pacemaker and are currently characterizing the loci responsible for their altered period phenotypes.     

Circadian clocks: translation

One of the big questions in biological rhythms research is how a stable and precise circa-24 hour oscillation is generated on the molecular level. While increasing complexity seemed to be the key, a recent report suggests that circa-24 hour rhythms can be generated by just four molecules incubated in a test tube.     

Circadian rhythms in cockroaches

Summary The driving oscillator, which mediates circadian locomotor rhythms in cockroaches, appears to reside in the protocerebrum of the brain. The evidence indicates that the optic lobes are crucial elements in this circadian system, and that control of rhythmicity is mediated through electrical, rather than hormonal, channels. Lesions were placed at various sites within the optic lobes in order to localize the areas controlling rhythmicity. It appears that the two innermost synaptic areas (the lobula and the medulla) constitute the crucial optic lobe elements. The outer synaptic area of the optic lobe (the lamina) is not necessary for the expression of rhythmicity, but does function as a coupling through which light cycles, transduced by the compound eyes, entrain the circadian clock.I would like to thank both Dr. Sue Binkley for her helpful comments in the preparation of this report, and Mr. Eli Levine for his assistance in photography. Support for this research was provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NS GB-30497).     

Circadian entrainment in Arabidopsis

Circadian clocks coordinate physiology and development as an adaption to the oscillating day/night cycle caused by the rotation of Earth on its axis and the changing length of day and night away from the equator caused by orbiting the sun. Circadian clocks confer advantages by entraining to rhythmic environmental cycles to ensure that internal events within the plant occur at the correct time with respect to the cyclic external environment. Advances in determining the structure of circadian oscillators and the pathways that allow them to respond to light, temperature, and metabolic signals have begun to provide a mechanistic insight to the process of entrainment in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We describe the concepts of entrainment and how it occurs. It is likely that a thorough mechanistic understanding of the genetic and physiological basis of circadian entrainment will provide opportunities for crop improvement.

The mechanisms by which circadian clocks adjust to daily rhythms of light, dark, temperature, and internal metabolism are now coming to light.