Mechanisms for defining supercoiling set point of DNA gyrase orthologs: I. A nonconserved acidic C-terminal tail modulates Escherichia coli gyrase activity

DNA topoisomerases manage chromosome supercoiling and organization in all cells. Gyrase, a prokaryotic type IIA topoisomerase, consumes ATP to introduce negative supercoils through a strand passage mechanism. All type IIA topoisomerases employ a similar set of catalytic domains for function; however, the activity and specificity of gyrase are augmented by a specialized DNA binding and wrapping element, termed the C-terminal domain (CTD), which is appended to its GyrA subunit. We have discovered that a nonconserved, acidic tail at the extreme C terminus of the Escherichia coli GyrA CTD has a dramatic and unexpected impact on gyrase function. Removal of the CTD tail enables GyrA to introduce writhe into DNA in the absence of GyrB, an activity exhibited by other GyrA orthologs, but not by wild-type E. coli GyrA. Strikingly, a "tail-less" gyrase holoenzyme is markedly impaired for DNA supercoiling capacity, but displays normal ATPase function. Our findings reveal that the E. coli GyrA tail regulates DNA wrapping by the CTD to increase the coupling efficiency between ATP turnover and supercoiling, demonstrating that CTD functions can be fine-tuned to control gyrase activity in a highly sophisticated manner.     

The Acidic C-terminal Tail of the GyrA Subunit Moderates the DNA Supercoiling Activity of Bacillus subtilis Gyrase

Gyrase is a type II DNA topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. It consists of a topoisomerase core, formed by the N-terminal domains of the two GyrA subunits and by the two GyrB subunits, that catalyzes double-stranded DNA cleavage and passage of a second double-stranded DNA through the gap in the first. The C-terminal domains (CTDs) of the GyrA subunits form a β-pinwheel and bind DNA around their positively charged perimeter. As a result, DNA is bound as a positive supercoil that is converted into a negative supercoil by strand passage. The CTDs contain a conserved 7-amino acid motif that connects blades 1 and 6 of the β-pinwheel and is a hallmark feature of gyrases. Deletion of this so-called GyrA-box abrogates DNA bending by the CTDs and DNA-induced narrowing of the N-gate, affects T-segment presentation, reduces the coupling of DNA binding to ATP hydrolysis, and leads to supercoiling deficiency. Recently, a severe loss of supercoiling activity of Escherichia coli gyrase upon deletion of the non-conserved acidic C-terminal tail (C-tail) of the CTDs has been reported. We show here that, in contrast to E. coli gyrase, the C-tail is a very moderate negative regulator of Bacillus subtilis gyrase activity. The C-tail reduces the degree of DNA bending by the CTDs but has no effect on DNA-induced conformational changes of gyrase that precede strand passage and reduces DNA-stimulated ATPase and DNA supercoiling activities only 2-fold. Our results are in agreement with species-specific, differential regulatory effects of the C-tail in gyrases from different organisms.     

Expression inEscherichia coliof Y5-Mutant and N-terminal Domain-Deleted DNA Gyrase B Proteins Affects Strongly Plasmid Maintenance

Escherichia coliDNA gyrase B subunit (GyrB) is composed of a 43-kDa N-terminal domain containing an ATP-binding site and a 47-kDa C-terminal domain involved in the interaction with the gyrase A subunit (GyrA). Site-directed mutagenesis was used to substitute, in both the entire GyrB subunit and its 43-kDa N-terminal fragment, the amino acid Y5 by either a serine (Y5S) or a phenylalanine residue (Y5F). Under standard conditions, cells bearing Y5S or Y5F mutant GyrB expression plasmids produced significantly less recombinant proteins than cells transformed with the wild-type plasmid. This dramatic decrease in expression of mutant GyrB proteins was not observed when the corresponding N-terminal 43-kDa mutant plasmids were used. Examination of the plasmid content of the transformed cells after induction showed that the Y5F and Y5S GyrB protein level was correlated with the plasmid copy number. By repressing tightly the promoter activity encoded by these expression vectors during cell growth, it was possible to restore the normal level of the mutant GyrB encoding plasmids in the transformed bacteria. Treatment with chloramphenicol before protein induction enabled large overexpression of the GyrB mutant Y5F and Y5S proteins. In addition, the decrease in plasmid copy number was also observed when the 47-kDa C-terminal fragment of the GyrB subunit was expressed in bacteria grown under standard culture conditions. Analysis of DNA supercoiling and relaxation activities in the presence of GyrA demonstrated that purified Y5-mutant GyrB proteins were deficient for ATP-dependent gyrase activities. Taken together, these results show that Y5F and Y5S mutant GyrB proteins, but not the corresponding 43-kDa N-terminal fragments, competein vivowith the bacterial endogenous GyrB subunit of DNA gyrase, thereby reducing the plasmid copy number in the transformed bacteria by probably acting on the level of negative DNA supercoilingin vivo.This competition could be mediated by the presence of the intact 47-kDa C-terminal domain in the Y5F and Y5S mutant GyrB subunits. This study demonstrates also that the amino acid Y5 is a crucial residue for the expression of the gyrase B activityin vivo.Thus, ourin vivoapproach may also be useful for detecting other important amino acids for DNA gyrase activity, as mutations affecting the ATPase activity or the GyrB/GyrB or GyrB/GyrA protein interactions.     

gyrB-225, a mutation of DNA gyrase that compensates for topoisomerase I deficiency: investigation of its low activity and quinolone hypersensitivity

The B subunit of DNA gyrase (GyrB) consists of a 43 kDa N-terminal domain, containing the site of ATP binding and hydrolysis, and a 47 kDa C-terminal domain that is thought to play a role in interactions with GyrA and DNA. In cells containing a deletion of topA (the gene encoding DNA topoisomerase I) a compensatory mutation is found in gyrB. This mutation (gyrB-225) results in a two amino acid insertion in the N-terminal domain of GyrB. We found that cells containing this mutation are more sensitive than wild-type cells to quinolone drugs with respect to bacteriostatic and lethal action. We have characterised the mutant GyrB protein in vitro and found it to have reduced DNA supercoiling, relaxation, ATPase, and cleavage activities. The mutant enzyme is up to threefold more sensitive to quinolones than wild-type. The mutation also increases the affinity of GyrB for GyrA and DNA, while the affinity of quinolone for the enzyme-DNA complex is unaffected. We propose that the loss in activity is due to misfolding of the GyrB-225 protein, providing an example in which misfolding of one protein, DNA gyrase, suppresses a deficiency of another, topoisomerase I. The increased quinolone sensitivity is proposed to be a consequence of an altered conformation of the protein that renders quinolones better able to disrupt, rather than generate, gyrase-drug-DNA complexes.     

The additional 165 amino acids in the B protein of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase have an important role in DNA binding

DNA gyrase is the only enzyme known to negatively supercoil DNA. The enzyme is a heterotetramer of A(2)B(2) subunit composition. Alignment of the primary sequence of gyrase B (GyrB) from various species shows that they can be grouped into two classes. The GyrB of Gram-negative eubacteria has a stretch of about 165 amino acids in the C-terminal half, which is lacking in other GyrB subunits and type II topoisomerases. In Escherichia coli, no function has so far been attributed to this stretch. In this study, we have tried to assess the function of this region both in vivo and in vitro. A deletant (GyrBDelta160) lacking this region is non-functional in vivo. The holoenzyme reconstituted from gyrase A (GyrA) and GyrBDelta160 shows reduced but detectable supercoiling and quinolone-induced cleavage activity in vitro. GyrBDelta160 retains its ability to bind to GyrA and novobiocin. However, when reconstituted with GyrA, the deletant shows greatly impaired DNA binding. The intrinsic ATPase activity of the GyrBDelta160 is comparable to that of wild type GyrB, but this activity is not stimulated by DNA. These studies indicate that the additional stretch present in GyrB is essential for the DNA binding ability of E. coli gyrase.     

Characterization of the interaction between DNA gyrase inhibitor and DNA gyrase of Escherichia coli.

Escherichia coli DNA gyrase is comprised of two subunits, GyrA and GyrB. Previous studies have shown that GyrI, a regulatory factor of DNA gyrase activity, inhibits the supercoiling activity of DNA gyrase and that both overexpression and antisense expression of the gyrI gene suppress cell proliferation. Here we have analyzed the interaction of GyrI with DNA gyrase using two approaches. First, immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that GyrI interacts preferentially with the holoenzyme in an ATP-independent manner, although a weak interaction was also detected between GyrI and the individual GyrA and GyrB subunits. Second, surface plasmon resonance experiments indicated that GyrI binds to the gyrase holoenzyme with higher affinity than to either the GyrA or GyrB subunit alone. Unlike quinolone antibiotics, GyrI was not effective in stabilizing the cleavable complex consisting of gyrase and DNA. Further, we identified an 8-residue synthetic peptide, corresponding to amino acids (89)ITGGQYAV(96) of GyrI, which inhibits gyrase activity in an in vitro supercoiling assay. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the ITGGQYAV-containing peptide-gyrase interaction indicated a high association constant for this interaction. These results suggest that amino acids 89--96 of GyrI are essential for its interaction with, and inhibition of, DNA gyrase.     

Solution structures of DNA-bound gyrase

The DNA gyrase negative supercoiling mechanism involves the assembly of a large gyrase/DNA complex and conformational rearrangements coupled to ATP hydrolysis. To establish the complex arrangement that directs the reaction towards negative supercoiling, bacterial gyrase complexes bound to 137- or 217-bp DNA fragments representing the starting conformational state of the catalytic cycle were characterized by sedimentation velocity and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments. The experiments revealed elongated complexes with hydrodynamic radii of 70–80 Å. Molecular envelopes calculated from these SAXS data show 2-fold symmetric molecules with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the A subunit and the ATPase domain of the B subunit at opposite ends of the complexes. The proposed gyrase model, with the DNA binding along the sides of the molecule and wrapping around the CTDs located near the exit gate of the protein, adds new information on the mechanism of DNA negative supercoiling.     

Pharmacophore modeling and molecular dynamics approach to identify putative DNA Gyrase B inhibitors for resistant tuberculosis

One of the major mechanisms followed by the therapeutic agents to target the causative organism of TB, mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), involves disruption of the replication cycle of the pathogen DNA. The process involves two steps that occur simultaneously, ie, breakage and reunion of DNA at gyrase A (GyrA) domain and ATP hydrolysis at gyrase B (GyrB) domain. Current therapy for multi-drug resistant TB involves FDA approved, Fluoroquinolone-based antibiotics, which act by targeting the replication process at GyrA domain. However, resistance against fluoroquinolones due to mutations in the GyrA domain has limited the use of this therapy and shifted the focus of the research community on the GyrB domain. Thus, this study involves in silico designing of chemotherapeutic agents for resistant TB by targeting GyrB domain. In the current study, a pharmacophore model for GyrB domain was generated using reported inhibitors. It was utilized as a query search against three commercial databases to identify GyrB domain inhibitors. Additionally, a qualitative Hip-Hop pharmacophore model for GyrA was also developed on the basis of some marketed fluoroquinolone-based GyrA inhibitors, to remove non-selective gyrase inhibitors obtained in virtual screening. Further, molecular dynamic simulations were carried out to determine the stability of the obtained molecules in complex with both the domains. Finally, Molecular mechanics with generalized Born and surface area solvation score was calculated to determine the binding affinity of obtained molecule with both domains to determine the selectivity of the obtained molecules that resulted in seven putative specific inhibitors of GyrB domain.     

Binding of two DNA molecules by type II topoisomerases for decatenation

Topoisomerases (topos) maintain DNA topology and influence DNA transaction processes by catalysing relaxation, supercoiling and decatenation reactions. In the cellular milieu, division of labour between different topos ensures topological homeostasis and control of central processes. In Escherichia coli, DNA gyrase is the principal enzyme that carries out negative supercoiling, while topo IV catalyses decatenation, relaxation and unknotting. DNA gyrase apparently has the daunting task of undertaking both the enzyme functions in mycobacteria, where topo IV is absent. We have shown previously that mycobacterial DNA gyrase is an efficient decatenase. Here, we demonstrate that the strong decatenation property of the enzyme is due to its ability to capture two DNA segments in trans. Topo IV, a strong dedicated decatenase of E. coli, also captures two distinct DNA molecules in a similar manner. In contrast, E. coli DNA gyrase, which is a poor decatenase, does not appear to be able to hold two different DNA molecules in a stable complex. The binding of a second DNA molecule to GyrB/ParE is inhibited by ATP and the non-hydrolysable analogue, AMPPNP, and by the substitution of a prominent positively charged residue in the GyrB N-terminal cavity, suggesting that this binding represents a potential T-segment positioned in the cavity. Thus, after the GyrA/ParC mediated initial DNA capture, GyrB/ParE would bind efficiently to a second DNA in trans to form a T-segment prior to nucleotide binding and closure of the gate during decatenation.     

The key DNA-binding residues in the C-terminal domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase A subunit (GyrA)

As only the type II topoisomerase is capable of introducing negative supercoiling, DNA gyrase is involved in crucial cellular processes. Although the other domains of DNA gyrase are better understood, the mechanism of DNA binding by the C-terminal domain of the DNA gyrase A subunit (GyrA-CTD) is less clear. Here, we investigated the DNA-binding sites in the GyrA-CTD of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase through site-directed mutagenesis. The results show that Y577, R691 and R745 are among the key DNA-binding residues in M.tuberculosis GyrA-CTD, and that the third blade of the GyrA-CTD is the main DNA-binding region in M.tuberculosis DNA gyrase. The substitutions of Y577A, D669A, R691A, R745A and G729W led to the loss of supercoiling and relaxation activities, although they had a little effect on the drug-dependent DNA cleavage and decatenation activities, and had no effect on the ATPase activity. Taken together, these results showed that the GyrA-CTD is essential to DNA gyrase of M.tuberculosis, and promote the idea that the M.tuberculosis GyrA-CTD is a new potential target for drug design. It is the first time that the DNA-binding sites in GyrA-CTD have been identified.     

The "GyrA-box" is required for the ability of DNA gyrase to wrap DNA and catalyze the supercoiling reaction

DNA gyrase is the only topoisomerase that can introduce negative supercoils into DNA. It is thought that the binding of conventional type II topoisomerases, including topoisomerase IV, to DNA takes place at the catalytic domain across the DNA gate, whereas DNA gyrase binds to DNA not only at the amino-terminal catalytic domain but also at the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the GyrA subunit. The binding of the GyrA CTD to DNA allows gyrase to wrap DNA around itself and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. Recent structural studies, however, have revealed striking similarities between the GyrA CTD and the ParC CTD, as well as the ability of the ParC CTD to bind and bend DNA. Thus, the molecular basis of gyrase-mediated wrapping of DNA needs to be reexamined. Here, we have conducted a mutational analysis to determine the role of the "GyrA-box," a 7-amino acid-long motif unique to the GyrA CTD, in determining the DNA binding mode of gyrase. Either a deletion of the entire GyrA-box or substitution of the GyrA-box with 7 Ala residues abolishes the ability of gyrase to wrap DNA around itself and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. However, these mutations do not affect the relaxation and decatenation activities of gyrase. Thus, the presence of a GyrA-box allows gyrase to wrap DNA and catalyze the supercoiling reaction. The consequence of the loss of the GyrA-box during evolution of bacterial type II topoisomerases is discussed.     

Crystal structures of Thermotoga maritima reverse gyrase: inferences for the mechanism of positive DNA supercoiling

Reverse gyrase is an ATP-dependent topoisomerase that is unique to hyperthermophilic archaea and eubacteria. The only reverse gyrase structure determined to date has revealed the arrangement of the N-terminal helicase domain and the C-terminal topoisomerase domain that intimately cooperate to generate the unique function of positive DNA supercoiling. Although the structure has elicited hypotheses as to how supercoiling may be achieved, it lacks structural elements important for supercoiling and the molecular mechanism of positive supercoiling is still not clear. We present five structures of authentic Thermotoga maritima reverse gyrase that reveal a first view of two interacting zinc fingers that are crucial for positive DNA supercoiling. The so-called latch domain, which connects the helicase and the topoisomerase domains is required for their functional cooperation and presents a novel fold. Structural comparison defines mobile regions in parts of the helicase domain, including a helical insert and the latch that are likely important for DNA binding during catalysis. We show that the latch, the helical insert and the zinc fingers contribute to the binding of DNA to reverse gyrase and are uniquely placed within the reverse gyrase structure to bind and guide DNA during strand passage. A possible mechanism for positive supercoiling by reverse gyrases is presented.     

Overexpression, purification and photoaffinity labeling with a 3H-analogue of norfloxacin, of the GyrA and GyrB subunits of the DNA gyrase.

In spite of much work on DNA gyrase and quinolones for many years, our knowledge of the molecular basis of quinolone-gyrase action is still incomplete. We designed a photoaffinity labeling reagent for the quinolone target, and synthesized a norfloxacin analogue with an azide function which, under UV irradiation, becomes covalently linked to its target. For that, a large amount of purified gyrase was needed. Both subunits were purified using exclusion and affinity chromatography. A plasmid was used that allowed the overproduction of GyrA as a fusion-protein with six histidine residues at its carboxy-terminal domain. GyrA-(His)6 was purified after chromatography on a nickel-containing column, and native GyrB after chromatography on immobilized novobiocin. Reconstituted DNA gyrase (A2B2) had supercoiling activity. Photoaffinity labeling showed covalent binding of the 3H-photoaffinity analogue of norfloxacin to the gyrase-DNA complex, and mainly to the GyrA. The specific binding site remains to be explored.     

A strand-passage conformation of DNA gyrase is required to allow the bacterial toxin, CcdB, to access its binding site

DNA gyrase is the only topoisomerase able to introduce negative supercoils into DNA. Absent in humans, gyrase is a successful target for antibacterial drugs. However, increasing drug resistance is a serious problem and new agents are urgently needed. The naturally-produced Escherichia coli toxin CcdB has been shown to target gyrase by what is predicted to be a novel mechanism. CcdB has been previously shown to stabilize the gyrase ‘cleavage complex’, but it has not been shown to inhibit the catalytic reactions of gyrase. We present data showing that CcdB does indeed inhibit the catalytic reactions of gyrase by stabilization of the cleavage complex and that the GyrA C-terminal DNA-wrapping domain and the GyrB N-terminal ATPase domain are dispensable for CcdB's action. We further investigate the role of specific GyrA residues in the action of CcdB by site-directed mutagenesis; these data corroborate a model for CcdB action based on a recent crystal structure of a CcdB–GyrA fragment complex. From this work, we are now able to present a model for CcdB action that explains all previous observations relating to CcdB–gyrase interaction. CcdB action requires a conformation of gyrase that is only revealed when DNA strand passage is taking place.     

DNA Topoisomerase Inhibitors: Trapping a DNA-Cleaving Machine in Motion

Type II topoisomerases regulate DNA topology by making a double-stranded break in one DNA duplex, transporting another DNA segment through this break and then resealing it. Bacterial type IIA topoisomerase inhibitors, such as fluoroquinolones and novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors, can trap DNA cleavage complexes with double- or single-stranded cleaved DNA. To study the mode of action of such compounds, 21 crystal structures of a “gyrase^CORE” fusion truncate of Staphyloccocus aureus DNA gyrase complexed with DNA and diverse inhibitors have been published, as well as 4 structures lacking inhibitors. These structures have the DNA in various cleavage states and appear to track trajectories along the catalytic paths of the DNA cleavage/religation steps. The various conformations sampled by these multiple “gyrase^CORE” structures show rigid body movements of the catalytic GyrA WHD and GyrB TOPRIM domains across the dimer interface. Conformational changes common to all compound-bound structures suggest common mechanisms for DNA cleavage-stabilizing compounds. The structures suggest that S. aureus gyrase uses a single moving-metal ion for cleavage and that the central four base pairs need to be stretched between the two catalytic sites, in order for a scissile phosphate to attract a metal ion to the A-site to catalyze cleavage, after which it is “stored” in another coordination configuration (B-site) in the vicinity. We present a simplified model for the catalytic cycle in which capture of the transported DNA segment causes conformational changes in the ATPase domain that push the DNA gate open, resulting in stretching and cleaving the gate-DNA in two steps.     

Dissection of the nucleotide cycle of B. subtilis DNA gyrase and its modulation by DNA

DNA topoisomerases catalyze the inter-conversion of different topological forms of DNA. While all type II DNA topoisomerases relax supercoiled DNA, DNA gyrase is the only enyzme that introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. We present here a biophysical characterization of the nucleotide cycle of DNA gyrase from Bacillus subtilis, both in the absence and presence of DNA. B. subtilis DNA gyrase is highly homologous to its well-studied Escherichia coli counterpart, but exhibits unique mechanistic features. The active heterotetramer of B. subtilis DNA gyrase is formed by mixing the GyrA and GyrB subunits. GyrB undergoes nucleotide-induced dimerization and is an ATP-operated clamp. The intrinsic ATPase activity of gyrase is stimulated tenfold in the presence of plasmid DNA. However, in contrast to the E. coli homolog, the rate-limiting step in the nucleotide cycle of B. subtilis GyrB is ATP hydrolysis, not product dissociation or an associated conformational change. Furthermore, there is no cooperativity between the two DNA and ATP binding sites in B. subtilis DNA gyrase. Nevertheless, the enzyme is as efficient in negative supercoiling as the E. coli DNA gyrase. Our results provide evidence that the evolutionary goal of efficient DNA supercoiling can be realized by similar architecture, but differences in the underlying mechanism. The basic mechanistic features are conserved among DNA gyrases, but the kinetics of individual steps can vary significantly even between closely related enzymes. This suggests that each topoisomerase represents a different solution to the complex reaction sequence in DNA supercoiling.     

A New Crystal Structure of the Bifunctional Antibiotic Simocyclinone D8 Bound to DNA Gyrase Gives Fresh Insight into the Mechanism of Inhibition

Simocyclinone D8 (SD8) is an antibiotic produced by Streptomyces antibioticus that targets DNA gyrase. A previous structure of SD8 complexed with the N-terminal domain of the DNA gyrase A protein (GyrA) suggested that four SD8 molecules stabilized a tetramer of the protein; subsequent mass spectrometry experiments suggested that a protein dimer with two symmetry-related SD8s was more likely. This work describes the structures of a further truncated form of the GyrA N-terminal domain fragment with and without SD8 bound. The structure with SD8 has the two SD8 molecules bound within the same GyrA dimer. This new structure is entirely consistent with the mutations in GyrA that confer SD8 resistance and, by comparison with a new apo structure of the GyrA N-terminal domain, reveals the likely conformation changes that occur upon SD8 binding and the detailed mechanism of SD8 inhibition of gyrase. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments are consistent with the crystallography results and further suggest that a previously observed complex between SD8 and GyrB is ~ 1000-fold weaker than the interaction with GyrA.     

Twisting of the DNA-binding surface by a β-strand-bearing proline modulates DNA gyrase activity

DNA gyrase is the only topoisomerase capable of introducing (−) supercoils into relaxed DNA. The C-terminal domain of the gyrase A subunit (GyrA-CTD) and the presence of a gyrase-specific ‘GyrA-box’ motif within this domain are essential for this unique (−) supercoiling activity by allowing gyrase to wrap DNA around itself. Here we report the crystal structure of Xanthomonas campestris GyrA-CTD and provide the first view of a canonical GyrA-box motif. This structure resembles the GyrA-box-disordered Escherichia coli GyrA-CTD, both adopting a non-planar β-pinwheel fold composed of six seemingly spirally arranged β-sheet blades. Interestingly, structural analysis revealed that the non-planar architecture mainly stems from the tilted packing seen between blades 1 and 2, with the packing geometry likely being defined by a conserved and unusual β-strand-bearing proline. Consequently, the GyrA-box-containing blade 1 is placed at an angled spatial position relative to the other DNA-binding blades, and an abrupt bend is introduced into the otherwise flat DNA-binding surface. Mutagenesis studies support that the proline-induced structural twist contributes directly to gyrase’s (−) supercoiling activity. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that a β-strand-bearing proline may impact protein function. Potential relevance of β-strand-bearing proline to disease phenylketonuria is also noted.     

Guiding strand passage: DNA-induced movement of the gyrase C-terminal domains defines an early step in the supercoiling cycle

DNA gyrase catalyzes ATP-dependent negative supercoiling of DNA in a strand passage mechanism. A double-stranded segment of DNA, the T-segment, is passed through the gap in a transiently cleaved G-segment by coordinated closing and opening of three protein interfaces in gyrase. T-segment capture is thought to be guided by the C-terminal domains of the GyrA subunit of gyrase that wrap DNA around their perimeter and cause a DNA-crossing with a positive handedness. We show here that the C-terminal domains are in a downward-facing orientation in the absence of DNA, but swing up and rotate away from the gyrase body when DNA binds. The upward movement of the C-terminal domains is an early event in the catalytic cycle of gyrase that is triggered by binding of a G-segment, and first contacts of the DNA with the C-terminal domains, and contributes to T-segment capture and subsequent strand passage.     

The GyrA-box determines the geometry of DNA bound to gyrase and couples DNA binding to the nucleotide cycle

DNA gyrase catalyses the adenosine triphosphate-dependent introduction of negative supercoils into DNA. The enzyme binds a DNA-segment at the so-called DNA-gate and cleaves both DNA strands. DNA extending from the DNA-gate is bound at the perimeter of the cylindrical C-terminal domains (CTDs) of the GyrA subunit. The CTDs are believed to contribute to the wrapping of DNA around gyrase in a positive node as a prerequisite for strand passage towards negative supercoiling. A conserved seven amino acid sequence motif in the CTD, the so-called GyrA-box, has been identified as a hallmark feature of gyrases. Mutations of the GyrA-box abolish supercoiling. We show here that the GyrA-box marginally stabilizes the CTDs. Although it does not contribute to DNA binding, it is required for DNA bending and wrapping, and it determines the geometry of the bound DNA. Mutations of the GyrA-box abrogate a DNA-induced conformational change of the gyrase N-gate and uncouple DNA binding and adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis. Our results implicate the GyrA-box in coordinating DNA binding and the nucleotide cycle.