A systems biology approach to dissect the contribution of brassinosteroid and auxin hormones to vascular patterning in the shoot of Arabidopsis thaliana

Systems biology can foster our understanding of hormonal regulation of plant vasculature. One such example is our recent study on the role of plant hormones brassinosteroids (BRs) and auxin in vascular patterning of Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) shoots. By using a combined approach of mathematical modelling and molecular genetics, we have reported that auxin and BRs have complementary effects in the formation of the shoot vascular pattern. We proposed that auxin maxima, driven by auxin polar transport, position vascular bundles in the stem. BRs in turn modulate the number of vascular bundles, potentially by controlling cell division dynamics that enhance the number of provascular cells. Future interdisciplinary studies connecting vascular initiation at the shoot apex with the established vascular pattern in the basal part of the plant stem are now required to understand how and when the shoot vascular pattern emerges in the plant.Key words: Arabidopsis, vascular, auxin, brassinosteroids, mathematical model, computer simulationsThe plant vascular system is responsible for the long-distance transport of water, solutes and molecules throughout the plant, being essential for plant growth and development. It is formed by two different functional tissues: the xylem, which transports water from roots to aerial organs, and the phloem, through which nutrients and photosynthetic products and signaling molecules are transported.During embryogenesis, the vasculature is characterized as an undifferentiated procambial tissue in the innermost part of the plant embryo.¹ Later in development, the procambium (i.e., a group of pluripotent stem cells²) begins to divide and differentiate into xylem and phloem tissues through oriented cell divisions. In the shoot, procambium generates xylem tissue centripetally and phloem tissue centrifugally, driving the formation of collateral vascular bundles around it.^3,4 In the inflorescence stem of the model plant Arabidopsis, the radial pattern of the vasculature exhibits a periodic organization made by the alternation of vascular bundles and interfascicular fibers, which altogether form the vascular ring (Fig. 1A).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Vascular patterning in Arabidopsis shoot inflorescence stem. (A) Radial section of DR5::GUS expression at the base of the inflorescence stem in Arabidopsis Col-0 plants. (B) Computer simulation result for auxin concentration ([Auxin]) in arbitrary units (a.u.) along a ring of cells; x and y stand for spatial coordinates. Auxin is distributed in maxima which, according to the model hypothesis, position vascular bundles. (C) Longitudinal section of Arabidopsis Col-0 wild-type plant at the most apical zone, immediately below the shoot apical meristem. Arrows point to xylem strains coming from the lateral organs.Previous studies have documented the importance of plant hormones such as auxin and BRs in vascular cell differentiation and patterning.⁵ Defective polar auxin transport distorts shoot vascular patterning^6,7 and BR loss-of-function mutants exhibit few vascular bundles.^8,9 But how do these hormones control shoot vascular patterning? In order to answer this question, we used both quantitative measurements of vascular phenotypes and computational modeling.¹⁰     

Step by Step: Deciphering Ion Transport in the Root Xylem Parenchyma

Proton pumps produce electrical potential differences and differences in pH across the plasma membrane of cells which drive secondary ion transport through sym- and antiporters. We used the patch-clamp technique to characterize an H⁺-pump in the xylem parenchyma of barley roots. This cell type is of special interest with respect to xylem loading. Since it has been an ongoing debate whether xylem loading is a passive or an active process, the functional characterization of the H⁺-pump is of major interest in the context of previous work on ion channels through which passive salt efflux into the xylem vessels could occur. Cell-type specific features like its Ca²⁺ dependence were determined, that are important to interpret its physiological role and eventually to model xylem loading. We conclude that the electrogenic pump in the xylem parenchyma does not participate directly in the transfer of KCl and KNO₃ to the xylem but, in combination with short-circuiting conductances, plays a crucial role in controlling xylem unloading and loading through modulation of the voltage difference across the plasma membrane. Here, our recent results on the H⁺ pump are put in a larger context and open questions are highlighted.Key Words: plant nutrition, H⁺-ATPase, anion conductance, K⁺ channel, electrophysiology, signaling networkThe root xylem parenchyma is of major interest with respect to nutrient (and signal) traffic between root and shoot. One of its main functions appears to be xylem loading. However, the cell walls of the vascular tissue provide apoplastic paths between xylem and phloem that represent the upward and downward traffic lanes, allowing nutrient circulation¹ (Fig. 1). Therefore mechanisms for ion uptake and for ion release must exist side by side. In the last 15 years major progress has been made in the investigation of transport properties of xylem-parenchyma cells, and both uptake and release channels and transporters were identified. Today, we have good knowledge on the role of K⁺ and anion conductances in xylem loading with salts.² Note, that from the functionally well characterized conductances only the molecular structure of K⁺ channels is known. In contrast, many transporters are identified on the molecular level, but functional data are scarce.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of tissues in the periphery of the stele. The stippled area marks the region from which early metaxylem protoplasts originated. E, Endodermis with Casparian strip; eMX, ‘early’ metaxylem vessel; IMX, ‘late’ metaxylem vessel; Mph, metaphloem (sieve tube); Pph, protophloem (sieve tube); P, pericycle; Cx, cortex. Symplasmic and apoplasmic transport routes are indicated in red and black, respectively. The Casparian strip prevents apoplastic transport into the stele. Plasmodesmata are shown exemplarily for the indicated symplastic pathway. All cells of the symplast are connected via plasmodesmata. Sites of active uptake into the root symplast and of release into the stelar apoplast are indicated by a black and an orange arrow. Modified from Wegner and Raschke, 1994.³A challenging question to deal with was the dispute about xylem loading with ions being a passive or active process. While it is clear that energy through electrogenic H⁺ efflux is needed to take up nutrient ions from the soil against their electrochemical gradient into the cortical symplast, it has been a matter of debate if ion release into xylem vessels also is energy-linked or if the electrochemical potentials of ions are raised high enough to allow a thermodynamically passive flux.^2,3 The Casparian strip prohibits apoplastic transport of nutrients into the stele and electrically insulates the stelar from the cortical apoplast. Therefore the electrical potential difference of the cells in the xylem parenchyma could be independent from the cortical potential difference but be subject to control, for instance, from the shoot.⁴ Indeed, evidence points to xylem loading as a second control point in nutrient transfer to the shoot.^5,6 The identification and characterization of K⁺ and anion conductances clearly showed that release of KCl and KNO₃ into the xylem can be passive through voltage-dependent ion channels.^2,3,7–9 No need appeared for a pump energizing the transfer of salts to the xylem.However, H⁺ pumps are ubiquitous. H⁺-ATPases are encoded by a multigene family and heterologous expression in yeast showed that isoforms have distinct enzymatic properties.^10,11 As the example of the amino acid transporter AAP6 from the xylem parenchyma shows, a cell-type specific functional characterization of transporters is essential to draw conclusions on their physiological role. AAP6 is the only member of a multigene family with an affinity for aspartate in the physiologically relevant range. The actual apoplastic concentration of amino acids and the pH will determine what is transported in vivo.^12,13 Xylem-parenchyma cells of barley roots were strongly labelled by antibodies against the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase.¹⁴ In a recent publication in Physiologia Plantarum we report the functional analysis of the electrogenic pump from the plasma membrane of xylem parenchyma from barley roots that was done with the patch-clamp technique after specific isolation of protoplasts from this cell type. It displayed characteristics of an H⁺-ATPase: current-voltage relationships were characteristic for a ‘rheogenic’ pump¹⁵ and currents were stimulated by fusicoccin or by an enlarged transmembrane pH gradient and inhibited by dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD). Importantly, it also showed distinct characteristics. Neither intracellular pH nor the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration affected its activity. Noteworthy, K⁺ and anion conductances from the same cell type are controlled by intracellular [Ca²⁺]^7,9 (Fig. 2). It was proposed that the effect of abscisic acid (ABA) on anion conductances is mediated via an increase in the cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentration.¹⁶ Very likely stelar H⁺ pumps are stimulated by ABA.¹⁷ Thus, a Ca²⁺ independent control has to be hypothesized in this case.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Control of ion conductances in the plasma membrane of xylem-parenchyma cells. Arrowheads indicate stimulation and bars indicate inhibition by an increase in cytosolic [Ca²⁺],^7,9,16 by ABA,^16,17,21 by cytosolic and apoplastic acidification,^4,22 by G-proteins²³ and by an increase in apoplastic [K⁺]⁷ and [NO₃⁻].²⁴ Apoplastic [K⁺] and [NO₃⁻] modify the voltage dependence exerting negative feedback on K⁺ efflux and a positive feedback on NO₃⁻ efflux. Abscisic acid has an immediate effect on ion channel activity, most likely via [Ca²⁺], and causes a change in gene expression as indicated by circles (up) and bars (down). ABA perception is not clear. A Ca²⁺ influx could occur through a hyperpolarization activated cation conductance (HACC).^16,25 Cation transporters are NORC, nonselective cation conductance, KORC, K⁺-selective outwardly rectifying conductance (=SKOR⁸), and KIRC, K⁺-selective inwardly rectifying conductance, and anion conductances with different voltage-dependencies and gating characteristics are X-QUAC, quickly activating anion conductance, X-SLAC, slowly activating anion conductance, and X-IRAC, inwardly rectifying anion channel.^2,3,9,16,26 Transported ions and direction of flux are plotted.To date, we know that besides Ca²⁺ and abscisic acid also the pH, nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs and extracellular NO₃⁻ and K⁺ affect membrane transport capacities of root xylem-parenchyma cells (Fig. 2). Other control mechanisms by metabolites, the redox potential and phytohormones have to be included, especially if they represent signals in xylem loading or root-shoot communication. The composition of the xylem sap changes during the course of a day, depending on nutrient supply and various stresses, and the apoplastic ion concentration is considered to be an important factor in ion circulation.^6,18,19 ABA is such a signal. It is known to increase solute accumulation within the root by inhibiting release of ions into the xylem.¹⁷ Any change in transport activity has an impact on the membrane potential. This again determines whether salt release or uptake takes place. Passive salt release is restricted to a limited range of membrane potentials in which conductances for anions and cations are active simultaneously, that is with depolarization. Negative membrane voltages will be required for reabsorption of NO₃⁻ by a putative NO₃⁻/H⁺-symporter and for the uptake of K⁺ and amino acids.^3,13 As shown in our recent paper, the balance between the activities of the H⁺-pump and the anion conductances could affect the position between a depolarized and a hyperpolarized state of the parenchymal membrane. Thus, H⁺ pump activity is crucial in membrane voltage control. Furthermore, the simultaneous activities of H⁺ pumps and anion conductances make the generation of a high pH gradient possible, whilst maintaining electroneutrality. The proton gradient could be used for ion transport through cotransporters and antiporters as suggested for the loading of borate into the xylem through the boron transporter BOR1.²⁰ So we are on the way to decipher xylem loading in roots and this exciting field will also provide information about small-scale nutrient cycling and root-shoot communication. To determine how the activities of pumps, channels and transporters are adjusted among each other is the next challenge. Further insight has to be obtained by experimentation as well as by biophysical modeling.     

MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP kinase successively mediate H2O2 signaling in Vicia guard cell

As a second messenger, H₂O₂ generation and signal transduction is subtly controlled and involves various signal elements, among which are the members of MAP kinase family. The increasing evidences indicate that both MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase mediate ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling in plant cells. Here we analyze the mechanisms of similarity and difference between MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase in mediating ABA-induced H₂O₂ generation, inhibition of inward K⁺ currents, and stomatal closure. These data suggest that activation of MEK1/2 is prior to p38-like protein kinase in Vicia guard cells.Key words: H₂O₂ signaling, ABA, p38-like MAP kinase, MEK1/2, guard cellAn increasing number of literatures elucidate that reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially H₂O₂, is essential to plant growth and development in response to stresses,^1–4 and involves activation of various signaling events, among which are the MAP kinase cascades.^1–3,5 Typically, activation of MEK1/2 mediates NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS generation in response to stresses,^4,6–8 and the facts that MEK1/2 inhibits the expression and activation of antioxidant enzymes reveal how PD98059, the specific inhibitor of MEK1/2, abolishes abscisic acid (ABA)-induced H₂O₂ generation.^6,8,9 It has been indicated that PD98059 does not to intervene on salicylic acid (SA)-stimulated H₂O₂ signaling regardless of SA mimicking ABA in regulating stomatal closure.^2,6,8,10 Generally, activation of MEK1/2 promotes ABA-induced stomatal closure by elevating H₂O₂ generation in conjunction with inactivating anti-oxidases.Moreover, activation of plant p38-like protein kinase, the putative counterpart of yeast or mammalian p38 MAP kinase, has been reported to participate in various stress responses and ROS signaling. It has been well documented that p38 MAP kinase is involved in stress-triggered ROS signaling in yeast or mammalian cells.^11–13 Similar to those of yeast and mammals, many studies showed the activation of p38-like protein kinase in response to stresses in various plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana,^14–16 Pisum sativum,¹⁷ Medicago sativa¹⁸ and tobacco.¹⁹ The specific p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 was found to modulate physiological processes in plant tissues or cells, such as wheat root cells,²⁰ tobacco tissue²¹ and suspension-cultured Oryza sativa cells.²² Recently, we investigate how activation of p38-like MAP kinase is involved in ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling in guard cells. Our results show that SB203580 blocks ABA-induced stomatal closure by inhibiting ABA-induced H₂O₂ generation and decreasing K⁺ influx across the plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells, contrasting greatly with its analog SB202474, which has no effect on these events.^23,24 This suggests that ABA integrate activation of p38-like MAP kinase and H₂O₂ signaling to regulate stomatal behavior. In conjunction with SB203580 mimicking PD98059 not to mediate SA-induced H₂O₂ signaling,^23,24 these results generally reveal that the activation of p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 is similar in guard cells.On the other hand, activation of p38-like MAP kinase^23,24 is not always identical to that of MEK1/2^8,25 in ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling of Vicia guard cells. For example, H₂O₂^- and ABA-induced stomatal closure was partially reversed by SB203580. The maximum inhibition of both regent-induced stomatal closure were observed at 2 h after treatment with SB203580, under which conditions the stomatal apertures were 89% and 70% of the control values, respectively. By contrast, when PD98059 was applied together with ABA or H₂O₂, the effects of both ABA- and H₂O₂-induced stomatal closure were completely abolished (Fig. 1). These data imply that the two members of MAP kinase family are efficient in H₂O₂-stimulated stomatal closure, but p38-like MAP kinase is less susceptive than MEK1/2 to ABA stimuli.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effects of SB203580 and PD98059 on ABA- and H₂O₂-induced stomatal closure. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.^8,23,24It has been reported that ABA or NaCl activate p38 MAP kinase in the chloronema cells of the moss Funaria hygrometrica in 2∼10 min.²⁶ Similar to this, SB203580 improves H₂O₂-inhibited inward K⁺ currents after 4 min and leads it to the control level (100%) during the following 8 min (Fig. 2). However, the activation of p38-like MAP kinase in response to ABA need more time, and only recovered to 75% of the control at 8 min of treatment (Fig. 2). These results suggest that control of H₂O₂ signaling is required for the various protein kinases including p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 in guard cells,^1,2,8,23,24 and the ABA and H₂O₂ pathways diverge further downstream in their actions on the K⁺ channels and, thus, on stomatal control. Other differences in action between ABA and H₂O₂ are known. For example, Köhler et al. (2001) reported that H₂O₂ inhibited the K⁺ outward rectifier in guard cells shows that H₂O₂ does not mimic ABA action on guard cell ion channels as it acts on the K⁺ outward rectifier in a manner entirely contrary to that of ABA.²⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effect of SB203580 on ABA- and H₂O₂-inhibited inward K⁺ currents. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.²⁴ SB203580 directs ABA- and H₂O₂-inactivated inward K⁺ currents across plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells. Here the inward K⁺ currents value is stimulated by −190 mV voltage.Based on the similarity and difference between PD98059 and SB203580 in interceding ABA and H₂O₂ signaling, we speculate the possible mechanism is that the member of MAP kinase family specially regulate signal event in ABA-triggered ROS signaling network,^1–4 and the signaling model as follows (Fig. 3).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Schematic illustration of MAP kinase-mediated H₂O₂ signaling of guard cells. The arrows indicate activation. The line indicates enhancement and the bar denotes inhibition.     

ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Induction as well as suppression: How aphid saliva may exert opposite effects on plant defense

Aphids ingest from the sieve tubes and by doing so they are confronted with sieve-tube occlusion mechanisms, which are part of the plant defense system. Because aphids are able to feed over longer periods, they must be able to prevent occlusion of the sieve plates induced by stylet penetration. Occlusion probably depends upon Ca²⁺-influx into the sieve element (SE) lumen. Aphid behavior, biochemical tests and in vitro experiments demonstrated that aphid''s watery saliva, injected during initial phase of a stylet penetration into the SE lumen, contains proteins that are able to bind calcium and prevent calcium-induced SE occlusion. In this addendum, we speculate on the consequences of saliva secretion for plant resistance. (a) The release of elicitors (e.g., oligogalacturonides) due to cell wall digestion by gel saliva enzymes may increase the resistance of cortex, phloem parenchyma cells and companion cells (CC) around the puncture site. (b) Ca²⁺-binding by aphid watery saliva may suppress the local defense responses in the SEs. (c) Signaling cascades triggered in CCs may lead to systemic resistance.Key words: aphid saliva, calcium binding, elicitor, oligogalacturonides, local plant defense, systemic plant defense, phloem translocation, aphid/plant-interactionAfter having penetrated the sieve-element (SE) plasma membrane, aphids encounter unspecific wound-induced occlusion reactions to prevent sap leakage.^1–4 Occlusion mechanisms by callose, structural P-proteins and forisomes are likely induced by a sudden calcium influx into the sieve-tube lumen.⁵ Calcium possibly enters the sieve-tube lumen through the stylet wounding-site in the plasma membrane and/or stretch-activated calcium-channels.^6–8 After SE penetration, aphids secrete watery saliva that contains calcium-binding proteins presumed to sabotage sieve-plate occlusion.^9,10We demonstrated that Megoura viciae (Buckton) is most likely able to prevent or reduce sieve-tube occlusion in Vicia faba by secretion of watery saliva. By in vitro confrontation of isolated forisomes, protein bodies responsible for sieve-tube occlusion in Fabaceaen,⁵ and watery saliva concentrate, we were able to show that salivary proteins convey forisomes from a dispersed (+Ca²⁺) into a condensed (−Ca²⁺) state.¹⁰ The dispersed forisome functions in vivo as a plug, leading to stoppage of mass flow.⁵This in vitro evidence was corroborated by aphid behavior in response to leaf tip burning, which triggers an electrical potential wave (EPW) along the sieve tubes. Such an EPW induces Ca²⁺-influx and corresponding SE occlusion along the pathway.¹¹ The passage of the EPW is associated with a prolonged secretion of watery saliva of aphids. This is interpreted as an attempt to unplug the SEs by calcium binding.¹⁰ Similar behavioral changes in response to leaf-tip burning were observed in an extended set of aphid/plant species combinations, indicating that attempted sabotage of sieve-tube occlusion by aphid saliva is a widespread phenomenon (unpublished).Aphid feeding was reported to induce local (on the same leaf) and systemic (in distant leaves) reactions of the host plant. The local response led to enhanced feeding,^12–14 while the systemic response showed reduced ingestion and extended periods of watery saliva secretion in sieve tubes distant from previous feeding sites.^12–14 These contrasting observations were described to be independent of the aphid species.¹³ The question arises how aphids induce these seemingly opposite plant responses?The aphid stylet pushing forward through cortical and vascular tissue is surrounded by a sheath of gel saliva, secreted into the apoplast.^15,16 Gel saliva contains cellulase and pectinase that amongst others produce oligogalacturonides (OGs) along the stylet sheath by digestion of cell wall material.^17,18 Usually, OGs act as elicitors, triggering a variety of plant responses against pathogens and insects in which the activation of calcium channels is involved.^19,20 This seems to conflict with a suppression of resistance as observed for the impact of watery saliva in SEs.¹⁰ We will make an attempt to explain this paradoxon.OG induced defense responses may be triggered in all cell types adjacent to the salivary sheath (Fig. 1). Because watery saliva is only secreted briefly into these cells, which are punctured for orientation purposes (Hewer et al., unpublished), it seems unlikely that OG induced defense is suppressed here by saliva-mediated calcium binding.¹⁵ The diffusion range of OGs may be restricted to the close vicinity of the stylet sheath leading to an enhanced regional defense with a limited sphere of action (Fig. 1). Because the settling distance of aphids is restricted by their body size (1–10 mm),²¹ aphids feeding on the same leaf are probably hardly confronted with the regional defense induced by another aphid (Fig. 1). Otherwise, they would show an increased number of test probes before first phloem activity, as described for volatile mediated plant defense in cortex cells.¹³ Circumstantial support in favor of our hypothesis is provided by production of hydrogen peroxide in the apoplast,²² which is most likely associated with the action of OGs.²² Observations of hydrogen peroxide production during aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae) infestation of tomato in a limited area along the leaf veins, the preferred feeding sites of this species, indicate a locally restricted defense response (Fig. 1 and ​and22).⁴ The question arises why the cell signals are not spread via plasmodesmata to adjacent cells to induce resistance in a more extended leaf area? Dissemination of the signals may be prevented by closure of plasmodesmata (Fig. 1) through callose deposition,^23,24 which is most likely directly coupled with calcium influx induced by OGs,²⁵ by apoplastic hydrogen peroxide and to a minor extent by stylet puncture (Fig. 2).^7,26Open in a separate windowFigure 1Hypothetical model on how stylet penetration induces and suppresses plant defense. Sheath saliva (light blue) that envelopes the stylet during propagation through the apoplast contains cellulase and pectinase,^17,18 enzymes producing elicitors (e.g., oligogalacturonides (oGs)) by local cell wall digestion.¹⁹ Parenchyma cells adjacent to the sheath may develop a defense response owing to signaling cascades triggered by oG-mediated Ca²⁺-influx.¹⁹ Together with a Ca²⁺-dependent transient closure of plasmodesmata by callose (black crosses),^23,24 the focused production of oGs may cause a defense response with a limited sphere of action (red—strong, brown—light, green—none). This restricted domain of defense may not be perceived by other aphids, since the settling distance is limited by the aphid body size. Nearby aphids do not show any sign of defense perception in their probing and feeding behavior.¹⁴ Signaling cascade compounds may be channeled from parenchyma cells to CCs (dashed yellow arrows), where they are subsequently released into the SEs. There they may act as long-distance systemic defense components (grey arrows). In contrast to the parenchyma domain (where only minor amounts of watery saliva are secreted), Ca²⁺-mediated reactions such as defense cascades and sieve-plate (SP) occlusion are suppressed in SEs by large amounts of watery saliva. The left aphid penetrates an SE and injects watery saliva (red cloud; ws) that inhibits local sieve-plate occlusion and,¹⁰ most likely, is transported by mass flow (black arrow) to adjacent SEs,²⁷ where occlusion is impeded as well. A short-distance systemic spread over a few centimeters may explain local suppression of plant defense resulting in a higher rate of colonization. Salivary proteins or their degradation products may serve as systemic defense signals as well (grey arrows), but may also diffuse via the PPUs into CCs where additional systemic signals are induced (yellow arrows).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Hypothetical involvement of Ca²⁺-channels in aphid-induced cell defense (detail). During probing with its stylet the aphid secretes gel saliva as a lubrication substance (light blue) into the apoplast.¹⁵ on the way to the sieve tubes, aphids briefly puncture most non-phloem cells (red) after which the puncturing sites are sealed with gel saliva.^7,16 Gel saliva also most likely prevents the influx of apoplastic calcium into pierced sieve elements (green) by sealing the penetration site.⁷ Watery saliva (red cloud), injected into the SE lumen,⁹ contains proteins which bind calcium ions (marked by X) that enter the SE via e.g., mechano sensitive Ca²⁺-channels activated by stylet penetration (blue tons).¹⁰ In this way, aphids suppress SE occlusion and activation of local defense cascades. In the parenchyma cells around the gel saliva sheath, a small cylindrical zone of defense may be induced by oligogalacturonides (oGs; brown triangles) produced by cell wall (grey) digestion.^17–19 Perceived by unknown receptor proteins (R; e.g., a receptor like protein kinase)³⁴ and kinase mediation (black dotted and dashed arrows), oGs lead to a Ca²⁺-influx through kinase activated calcium channels (orange tons).²⁵ Around the probing site, aphids apparently induce the production of superoxide by Ca²⁺-induced activation of the NADPH oxidase (violet box) and its following conversion to hydrogen peroxide (red spots) is mediated by superoxide dismutase (SoD).⁴ Hydrogen peroxide activates Ca²⁺-channels (violet tons) and diffuses through plasma membrane (curled arrows) therefore potentially acting as a intracellular signal.²⁶By contrast, Ca²⁺-influx into SEs, induced by presence of OGs or stylet insertion (Fig. 2), is not expected to trigger local defense given the abundant excretion of Ca²⁺-binding watery saliva.^7,10,25 Watery saliva may spread to down-stream and adjacent SEs through transverse and lateral sieve plates (Fig. 1).^7,27 Aphids puncturing nearby SEs may therefore encounter less severe sieve-plate occlusion which results in facilitated settling and thus in increased population growth. Aggregation of feeding aphids would self-amplify population growth until a certain density is attained. Farther from the colonization site, this effect may be lost due to dilution. Stimulation of aphid feeding by aphid infestation was observed locally on potato by Myzus persicae and M. euphorbiae, respectively, 96 h after infestation.¹³ However, a similar effect was not observed for M. persicae on Arabidopsis thaliana where aphids induced premature leaf senescence and resistance 12 h after infestation,²⁸ possibly induced by OGs.¹⁹As a speculation, OG induced Ca²⁺-influx into parenchyma cells adjacent to the salivary sheath activate Ca²⁺-induced signaling cascades via CaM,^26,29 CDPKs,^30,31 MAPKinases and reactive oxygen species (Fig. 2).³² Systemic resistance, induced by aphid infestation,^12–14 is mediated by unknown compounds such as, e.g., salivary proteins, their degradation products, signal cascade products or volatiles.¹³ Compounds produced in CCs first have to pass the PPUs, while SE signaling elements can be directly transported via mass flow (Fig. 1).The question arises if aphids profit from induced resistance on local (cortex and parenchyma cells) and systemic (distant plant organs) levels as holds for suppression of defense in SEs. Possibly settling and subsequent spread of competing pathogens/herbivores (e.g., fungi or other piercing-sucking insects) are suppressed by induced defense. In this context it is intriguing to understand how aphids cope with the self-induced systemic resistance, which probably lasts over weeks.³³     

A dynamic DUO of regulatory proteins coordinates gamete specification and germ cell mitosis in the angiosperm male germline

The production of two functional sperm cells within each male gametophyte is essential for double fertilization in flowering plants and involves a single mitotic division of the male germ cell and cell specification to produce functional gametes. Several proteins that are important regulators of male germ cell division have been identified as well as the R2R3 MYB protein DUO1 that has a dual role in cell division and cell specification. We recently identified a novel regulatory protein DUO3, that has overlapping roles with DUO1 in cell division and specification and shows similarity to GON4 related cell lineage regulators in animals. DUO3 also has important roles outside the germline and is required for embryo patterning and meristem function. We outline the regulatory roles of DUO3 in male germline development and its possible mechanisms of action as a lineage regulator in current models that link germ cell cycle control and gamete specification.Key words: DUO3, male germline development, cell cycle, cell specification, Arabidopsis, pollen, GON4-LThe two sperm cells required for double fertilization in flowering plants are produced after an asymmetric division of the haploid microspore produces a large vegetative cell and a smaller germ cell, thereby establishing the male germline (reviewed in ref. 1; Fig. 1A). The germ cell is engulfed within the vegetative cell cytoplasm where it divides to produce the two sperm cells. The germ cell also goes through a process of specification, with ∼6,000 genes expressed in sperm cells,² many of which show specific or enhanced expression in the male germline and/or are essential for fertilization.^2–4 Since 2005 a number of proteins with important regulatory roles in either germ cell division^5–9 or both germ cell division and specification^10–12 have been described, enabling the formulation of basic models for the regulation of male germline development.^12,13 In our recent publication¹⁴ we identify a novel regulatory protein, DUO POLLEN3 (DUO3) that has essential roles in germ cell division and specification, as well as vital sporophytic functions. Here we present the role of DUO3 in an emerging model for the regulation of male germline development in Arabidopsis (Fig. 1B) and briefly discuss the wider role and possible mechanism of DUO3 function.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Overview of male gametophyte development in arabidopsis (a) and model of germ cell cycle progression and specification in the male germline (B). (A) Schematic of the distinct morphological stages of male gametophyte development in arabidopsis. Diploid pollen mother cells undergo meiotic division to produce a tetrad of haploid microspores. the released microspores undergo a highly asymmetric division to produce a bicellular pollen grain with a small germ cell engulfed within the cytoplasm of a large vegetative cell. Whilst the vegetative cell exits the cell cycle, the germ cell undergoes a further mitotic division to produce twin sperm cells. (B) a schematic model integrating the control of cell proliferation and sperm cell specification in male germline development of arabidopsis. after microspore division, the cell cycle inhibitors KrP6 and KrP7 are present in the newly formed germ cell. transient expression of FBL17 leads to the degradation of these KRPs, allowing CDKA/CYCD to phosphorylate RBR, thereby relieving RBR-mediated repression of the E2F/DP pathway and progression of the germ cell through S-phase. Gamete specification begins shortly after germ cell division, where the co-expression of DUO1 and DUO3 in the germ cell leads to the activation of common and distinct germline differentiation genes. Once S-phase is complete, the DuO1-dependent activation of the G₂/m phase regulator CYCB1;1 promotes germ cell cycle progression and entry into mitosis. In parallel, DUO3 also controls G₂/m transition, by an unknown mechanism that acts independently of cYcB1;1 expression. DUO1 and DUO3 therefore integrate germline differentiation with cell cycle progression. Ultimately, the cooperation of these parallel pathways results in a pair of fully differentiated sperm cells equipped with a complement of essential germline factors such as GcS1 that are required for successful gamete fusion.     

The Arabidopsis peroxisome division mutant pdd2 is defective in the DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3A (DRP3A) gene

In plants, the division of peroxisomes is mediated by several classes of proteins, including PEROXIN11 (PEX11), FISSION1 (FIS1) and DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3 (DRP3). DRP3A and DRP3B are two homologous dynamin-related proteins playing overlapping roles in the division of both peroxisomes and mitochondria, with DRP3A performing a stronger function than DRP3B in peroxisomal fission. Here, we report the identification and characterization of the peroxisome division defective 2 (pdd2) mutant, which was later proven to be another drp3A allele. The pdd2 mutant generates a truncated DRP3A protein and exhibits pale green and retarded growth phenotypes. Intriguingly, this mutant displays much stronger peroxisome division deficiency in root cells than in leaf mesophyll cells. Our data suggest that the partial GTPase effector domain retained in pdd2 may have contributed to the distinct mutant phenotype of this mutant.Key words: peroxisome division, dynamin-related protein, arabidopsisIn eukaryotic cells, peroxisomes are surrounded by single membranes and house a variety of oxidative metabolic pathways such as lipid metabolism, detoxification and plant photorespiration.^1,2 To accomplish multiple tasks, the morphology, abundance and positioning of peroxisomes need to be highly regulated. Three families of proteins, whose homologs are present across different kingdoms, have been shown to be involved in peroxisome division in Arabidopsis. The PEX11 protein family is composed of five integral membrane proteins with primary roles in peroxisome elongation/tubulation, the initial step in peroxisome division.^3–5 Although the exact function of PEX11s has not been demonstrated, these proteins are believed to participate in peroxisome membrane modification.^6,7 The FIS1 family consists of two isoforms, which are C-terminal tail-anchored membrane proteins with rate limiting functions at the fission step.^8,9 DRP3A and DRP3B belong to a superfamily of dynamin-related proteins, which are large and self-assembling GTPases involved in the fission and fusion of membranes by acting as mechanochemical enzymes or signaling GTPases.¹⁰ The function of PEX11 seems to be exclusive to peroxisomes, whereas DRP3 and FIS1 are shared by the division machineries of both peroxisomes and mitochondria in Arabidopsis.^8,9,11–16 FIS1 proteins are believed to tether DRP proteins to the peroxisomal membrane,^17,18 but direct evidence has not been obtained from plants. DRP3A and DRP3B share 77% sequence identity at the protein level and are functionally redundant in regulating mitochondrial division; however, DRP3A''s role on the peroxisome seems stronger and cannot be substituted by DRP3B in peroxisome division.^8,13,15In a continuous effort to identify components of the plant peroxisome division apparatus from Arabidopsis, we performed genetic screens in a peroxisomal marker background expressing the YFP (yellow fluorescent protein)-PTS1 (peroxisome targeting signal 1, containing Ser-Lys-Leu) fusion protein. Mutants with defects in the morphology and abundance of fluorescently labeled peroxisomes are characterized. Following our analysis of the pdd1 mutant, which turned out to be a strong allele of DRP3A,⁸ we characterized the pdd2 mutant.In root cells of the pdd2 mutant, extremely elongated peroxisomes and a beads-on-a-string peroxisomal phenotype are frequently observed (Fig. 1A and B). These peroxisome phenotypes resemble those of pdd1 and other strong drp3A alleles previously reported.^8,15 However, the peroxisome phenotype seems to be less dramatic in leaf mesophyll cells. For instance, in addition to the decreased number of total peroxisomes, peroxisomes in leaf cells are only slightly elongated or exhibit a beads-on-a-string phenotype (Fig. 1C and D). Previously, we reported the phenotypes of three strong drp3A alleles, all of which contain a large number of peroxules, long and thin membrane extensions from the peroxisome,⁸ yet such peroxisomal structures are not observed in pdd2. On the other hand, pdd2 has a more severe growth phenotype than most drp3A alleles, as it is slow in growth and has pale green leaves (Fig. 1E). Genetic analysis showed that pdd2 segregates as a single recessive mutation (data not shown).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Phenotypic analyses of pdd2 and identification of the PDD2 gene. (A–D) Confocal micrographs of root and mesophyll cells in 3-week-old wild type and pdd2 mutant plants. Green signals show peroxisomes; red signals show chloroplasts. Scale bars = 20 µm. (E) Growth phenotype of 3-week-old mutants. (F) Map-based cloning of the PDD2 gene. Genetic distance from PDD2 is shown under each molecular marker. Positions for mutations in previously analyzed drp3A alleles and pdd2 are indicated in the gene schematic. drp3A-1 and drp3A-2 are T-DNA insertion mutants, whereas pdd1 is an EMS mutant containing a premature stop codon in exon 6. (G) A schematic of the DRP3A (PDD2) protein with functional domains indicated. The pdd2 allele encodes a truncated protein lacking part of the GED domain.The unique combination of peroxisomal and growth phenotypes of pdd2 prompted us to use map-based cloning to identify the PDD2 gene, with the hope to discover novel proteins in the peroxisome division machinery. A population of approximately 6,000 F₂ plants (pdd2 × Ler) was generated. After screening 755 F₂ mutants, the pdd2 mutation was mapped to the region between markers T10C21 and F4B14 on the long arm of chromosome 4 (Fig. 1F). Since this region contains DRP3A, we sequenced the entire DRP3A gene in pdd2 and identified a G→A transition at the junction of the 18^th exon and intron (Fig. 1F). Further analysis revealed that the point mutation at this junction caused mis-splicing of intron 18, introducing a stop codon in the GTPase effector domain GED near the C terminus (Fig. 1G).DRPs share with the classic dynamins an N-terminal GTPase domain, a middle domain (MD), and a regulatory motif named the GTPase effector domain (GED) (Fig. 1G). To date, a total of 26 drp3A mutant alleles carrying missense or nonsense mutations along the length of the DRP3A gene have been isolated.^8,15 The combined peroxisomal and growth phenotype of pdd2 and the nature of the mutation in this allele are unique among all the drp3A alleles, indicating that the partial GED domain retained in pdd2 may have created some novel function for this protein. Further analysis of the truncated protein may be necessary to test this prediction.     

The role of rice phenolics efflux transporter in solubilizing apoplasmic iron

Iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient for plants whose deficiency presents a major worldwide agricultural problem. Moreover, Fe is not easily available in neutral to alkaline soils, rendering plants deficient in Fe despite its abundance. Plants secrete phenolics, such as protocatechuic acid (PCA) and caffeic acid (CA), to take up and utilize apoplasmic precipitated Fe, but despite the rapid progress in understanding cellular and subcellular Fe transport, the molecular mechanisms of phenolics synthesis and secretion are not clear. Recently, we isolated and characterized a phenolics efflux transporter in rice by characterizing a mutant in which the amount of PCA and CA in the xylem sap was dramatically reduced, which we hence named phenolics efflux zero 1 (pez1). PEZ1 is a plasma membrane protein that transports PCA when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and characterization of PEZ1 knockdown and overexpressing plants revealed that it plays an essential role in solubilizing precipitated apoplasmic Fe. The identification of PEZ1 will increase our understanding of apoplasmic Fe solubilization as well as promote research on phenolics efflux mechanisms in different organisms.Key words: iron, Oryza sativa, phenolics transport, protocatechuic acid, xylem sapAlthough mineral soils contain over 6% iron (Fe),¹ it predominantly exists as Fe(III) chelates, and plants ultimately cannot absorb Fe under various physiological conditions such as high soil pH in alkaline soils.² Thus, plants growing in high-pH soils are not very efficient in developing and stabilizing chlorophyll, resulting in the yellowing of leaves, poor growth and reduced yield. Plants, however, have developed sophisticated mechanisms to take up the small amount of soluble Fe. Non-graminaceous plants release protons, secrete phenolics, reduce Fe(III), and finally, take up Fe²⁺.^3–5 Once Fe is solubilized, Fe(III) is reduced to Fe²⁺ by a membrane-bound Fe(III) reductase oxidase.⁶ Then Fe²⁺ is transported into the root by an iron-regulated transporter (IRT1). In contrast, graminaceous plants rely on an Fe(III) chelation system through the secretion of mugineic acid (MA) family phytosiderophores.^3,7,8 The MAs are secreted to the rhizosphere through TOM1 ⁹ and then they chelate Fe(III); the resulting Fe-MA complex is transported by the Yellow Stripe family transporters (OsYSL15 in the case of rice¹⁰). Rice plants also have the ability to take up Fe²⁺ through the OsIRT1 transporter.¹¹In plants, Fe uptake from the apoplasm is well documented at the molecular level, with the exception of phenolics synthesis and efflux. Phenolics, such as protocatechuic acid (PCA), are reported to chelate Fe(III) solubilization and reduce it to Fe²⁺ in vitro.¹² Moreover, removing the secreted phenolics in hydroponic culture solution triggers Fe deficiency responses in roots by inhibiting the solubilization and utilization of apoplasmic Fe.¹³ In this manner, phenolics play a major role in Fe solubilization, besides which PCA and other phenolics play a diverse role in biological systems, such as acting as antioxidants and free radical scavengers, and in nitric oxide synthase.^14–17 Phenolics are also converted to lignin and suberin through the action of peroxidases.² The activity of peroxidases, as well as the formation of lignin, decreases under Fe deficient conditions.^2,18 As suberin plays an important role in controlling the movement of solutes,¹⁹ the role of phenolics in controlling water and mineral transport cannot be overlooked. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanism of phenolics efflux transport is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate widespread Fe deficiency.PEZ1 was isolated in an effort to characterize T-DNA mutants for genes regulated by cadmium (Cd). PEZ1 belongs to the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter family whose members transport small organic compounds.²⁰ The substrates of PEZ1 were identified by analyzing liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data profiles of the xylem sap of pez1-1 and pez1-2 mutants. The data indicated that PEZ1 transports PCA and caffeic acid (CA). Furthermore, PEZ1 transported radiolabeled PCA when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. PEZ1 localizes to the plasma membrane in rice root cells, as well as in rice root hairs and onion epidermal cells. The pez1-2 mutant accumulated more Fe in the roots, but not in the leaves, compared to wild-type (WT) plants; the differences were greater in the presence of Cd, while no difference was observed in the accumulation of other metals. No significant difference was observed in zinc, manganese (Mn), and copper concentration between WT and pez1-2, in both the roots and shoots, with or without Cd. Fe concentration in the xylem sap was lower than in the WT, while no difference was observed for xylem Cd and Mn. Significant differences in the localization of insoluble Fe were observed when leaf samples were stained with Perl''s solution to examine the localization of Fe. These results suggested a clear role of PEZ1 in solubilizing precipitated apoplasmic Fe.²¹Secretion of excess PCA strongly solubilizes Fe precipitated in the stele, leading to symptoms of Fe excess. The analysis of PEZ1 overexpression lines confirmed this hypothesis. PEZ1 overexpression lines accumulated higher amounts of Fe in roots and leaves owing to the high solubilization of precipitated apoplasmic stele Fe, and as a result, the growth of these lines was severely restricted. In contrast, PEZ1 overexpression lines grew better than the WT in calcareous soil, showing that in these lines, PCA-solubilized Fe is available under Fe-limiting conditions.The expression of PEZ1 is regulated by Cd, and both of the PEZ1 knockdown mutants accumulated higher Cd amounts in leaves and seeds when grown in soil, without compromising morphological or physiological characteristics, like the SPAD value, leaf dry weight, yield, and the concentration of other metals in seeds. Why pez1 accumulates Cd is not clear. PCA has a lower affinity for Cd compared to glutathione, and PEZ1 does not transport Cd.²¹ Cd is partly transported through the Fe uptake system in plants.^22–26 Thus, in pez1, Cd accumulation seems to be triggered by the upregulation of OsIRT1. OsIRT1 localization in the phloem, its substrate specificity, and increased expression in pez1 mutants suggests that Fe and Cd uptake and translocation in pez1 mutants could be enhanced through OsIRT1,¹¹ and that an increased Cd accumulation in pez1 mutants may be due to the increase in OsIRT activity in a decreased Fe environment in which Cd will have reduced competition. PEZ1 localizes to the stele in root cells. The localization of different genes involved in Fe transport is summarized in Figure 1.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Tissue-specific expression of Fe homeostasis-related genes in rice root.In short, phenolics secretion affects Fe acquisition in rice. Reduced secretion of PCA in the pez1-2 mutant impairs the solubilization of precipitated apoplasmic Fe in the stele, and thus, the low availability of Fe leads to the induction of OsIRT1. As PEZ1 and OsIRT1 co-localize in the stele, the PCA secretion may complement Fe²⁺ uptake by OsIRT1 and seems to be an integral part of the Fe²⁺ uptake system in rice (Fig. 2). In contrast, the increase in phenolics secretion in PEZ1-overexpressing plants increases the solubilization of apoplasmic Fe, and plants showed an increased tolerance to Fe deficiency in alkaline soils. The identification of PEZ1 is an important step that helps in better understanding the solubilization of apoplasmic Fe and will generate research on phenolics efflux mechanisms in other plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model of Fe and Cd uptake mechanisms in rice xylem. P.M., plasma membrane.     

High-throughput transient transformation of Arabidopsis roots enables systematic colocalization analysis of GFP-tagged proteins

Determination of the subcellular localization of an unknown protein is a major step towards the elucidation of its function. Lately, the expression of proteins fused to fluorescent markers has been very popular and many approaches have been proposed to express these proteins. Stable transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens generates stable lines for downstream experiments, but is time-consuming. If only colocalization is required, transient techniques save time and effort. Several methods for transient assays have been described including protoplast transfection, biolistic bombardment, Agrobacterium tumefaciens cocultivation and infiltration. In general colocalizations are preferentially performed in intact tissues of the same species, resembling the native situation. High transformation rates were described for cotyledons of Arabidopsis, but never for roots. Here we report that it is possible to transform Arabidopsis root epidermal cells with an efficiency that is sufficient for colocalization purposes.Key words: Arabidopsis, GFP-fusions, protein localization, root, transient transformationSince the release of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence plant biologists set the goal to elucidate the functions of all coded genes. Apart from the spatio-temporal expression patterns of genes, the subcellular localization of gene products can play an essential role in deciphering their function. Classical immunological approaches to localize proteins can be hindered by cross-reactivity, time-consuming generation of antibodies and the low temporal resolution. Expression of tagged proteins forms a suitable alternative. Lately, fusions with fluorescent proteins in combination with confocal (CLSM)¹ or spinning disc microscopy² allow real time protein localization and even subcellular trafficking at high resolution. An overview of fluorescent tagging approaches can be found elsewhere.³Currently several techniques to introduce the coding region for a tagged protein in a plant are available. The generation of stable lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens offers a continuous source of plant material, but it is time-consuming especially when only colocalization experiments are required. Transient assays, on the other hand, offer the advantage of being fast and amenable to high throughput strategies. Each of these techniques, however, has some limitations and drawbacks. Particle bombardment (biolistics) ^4–6 for example circumvents the host specificity of Agrobacterium strains, but requires expensive equipment. Moreover, it is rather disruptive and imposes a significant stress upon the plants, possibly influencing the results. Protoplasts lack a cell wall and protoplast transformation^7,8 is therefore not suitable for certain experiments related to cell wall proteins or when interactions between cells on tissue level might be important.⁹ Moreover, protoplasts have lost their identity which might be critical for the correct functioning of certain transgenic constructs. Agrobacterium infiltration of tobacco leaves¹⁰ is regularly used and represents an efficient, fast and relatively easy transformation technique. However, tobacco leaves easily show autofluoresence due to tissue damage as a result of experimental manipulations. As it has been reported that some protein fusions expressed in an heterologous system localize to different subcellular localizations11 it is advisable not to use tobacco when localizing Arabidopsis proteins. Leaf infiltrations have been performed in Arabidopsis,¹² but apparently their leaves are much more prone to mechanical damage and the leaf developmental stage is critical, complicating this technique. Cocultivation of Agrobacterium with seedlings offers a rapid and efficient approach applicable to many mono and dicot species. It was reported to work efficiently in Arabidopsis cotyledons, but not in roots.⁹ As an alternative method, Agrobacterium infiltration of Arabidopsis seedlings¹¹ seems an efficient technique for transient expression. However, expression in root cells could not be obtained. Colocalizations are required in the native cells or tissue for the correct localization of an unknown protein or proteins that need interaction partners. As a consequence this technique can not be reliably used when root expressed gene products are studied. Here we show evidence that it is possible to use the described technique¹¹ to induce transient expression in Arabidopsis roots.We used the Agrobacterium infiltration of Arabidopsis seedlings technique¹¹ to colocalize several C-terminal (S65T)-sGFP fusions generated in the plant binary vector pGWB6.¹³ Each construct was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (C59C1Rif^R) containing the helper plasmid pMP90. Subsequently different stable marker lines, wild type Arabidopsis (Col-0) bearing mCherry fusion constructs,¹⁴ were transiently transformed.¹¹ After 2 or 3 days seedlings were studied using CLSM. Besides being expressed in cotyledons fusion proteins were clearly observed in root epidermis and root cap cells (Fig. 1A and B). As reported¹¹ the transformation efficiency in cotyledons was considerably higher than in root cells. However, in each experiment we obtained a considerable amount of transformed root epidermal cells which was more than sufficient for colocalization studies (Fig. 2). It was remarkable that transformation was repeatedly successful in groups of cells, adjacent or close to each other.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transient transformation of Arabidopsis root cells. Expression of the protein-GFP fusion product can be seen in the epidermal (A) and root cap cells (B) on fluorescence/transmission merged images. As seen in (A) high efficiencies of root transformation can be reached.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Colocalization of mCherry and GFP constructs. Confocal image of the mCherry fluorescence (A), the GFP signal (B) and the merged image (C).In contrast to what was reported earlier we show here that the Agrobacterium infiltration technique¹¹ is perfectly capable of transiently transforming Arabidopsis root epidermal cells. It allows the transient production and study of proteins in their native environment, considerably increasing the reliability of such experiments. Additionaly the use of RFP marker constructs in colocalisation studies in the root is free of interference by the red background autofluorescence of chlorophyll.     

Chemical Signal as a Rapid Long-Distance Information Messenger After Local Wounding of a Plant?

A series of works have described an important role of chemical signaling compounds in generation of the stress response of plants in both the wounded and distant undamaged plant tissues. However, pure chemical signals are often not considered in the fast (minutes) long-distance signaling (systemic response) because of their slow propagation speed. Physical signals (electrical and hydraulic) or a combination of the physical and chemical signals (hydraulic dispersal of solutes) have been proposed as possible linkers of the local wound and the rapid systemic response. We have recently demonstrated an evidence for involvement of chemical compounds (jasmonic and abscisic acids) in the rapid (within 1 hour) inhibition of photosynthetic rate and stomata conductance in distant undamaged tobacco leaves after local burning. The aim of this addendum is to discuss plausible mechanisms of a rapid long-distance chemical signaling and the putative interactions between the physical and chemical signals leading to the fast systemic response.Key Words: tobacco, local burning, systemic response, hydraulic surge, electrical signal, abscisic acid, jasmonic acidPlants have evolved an amazingly complex system of defence-related strategies to protect themselves upon local wounding.^1–7 Important characteristics of self-defence responses of plants are their velocity and ubiquity. Indeed, fast (minutes to hours) responses to injurious factors have been detected in the site of injury and in distant regions (systemic response) in various plants.^8–11 These findings suggest that a signal generated by an attack to one leaf is transmitted through a whole plant. Several kinds of chemical^3,6 and physical¹² signals induced by local wounding and even their combination¹³ have been implicated. However, a little is known about the interactions of these signals and about the mechanisms of initiation of the short-term systemic responses.We have used a model system—tobacco plants exposed to the local burning—to study the signals involved in rapid wound responses of photosynthetic apparatus.¹⁴ Local burning of an upper leaf of a tobacco plant induced rapid changes in surface electrical potential (within seconds) and a pronounced fast decline in the stomatal conductance, CO₂ assimilation and transpiration (within minutes) in the basipetal direction (Fig. 1). Moreover, we have detected a fast (within minutes) transient increase in levels of endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) followed by a huge rapid rise in endogenous jasmonic acid (JA) in the leaf below the burned one. ABA and jasmonates are known to be involved in signaling pathways leading to stomatal closure and downregulation of photosynthesis.^15,16 Increases in ABA and/or JA levels have only previously been detected in remote untreated tissues several hours after local wounding^8,9 suggesting that chemical signals are too slow to induce rapid systemic response. Previous works have reported that fast physical (electrical) signals play an essential role in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses.^11,17 However, a several-minutes delayed stomata closing response after the initiation of electrical potential changes has been reported in Mimosa¹⁸ and in our case in tobacco¹⁴ plants. Therefore, the guard cell deflation is most likely triggered not only by the electrical signal, but also by indirect factors. Based on close correlations, our results now provide a new evidence for the idea that chemical signals (ABA and mainly JA) participate in mediating the short-term systemic photosynthetic responses to local burning in tobacco plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 1The model of putative signalling pathways leading to the rapid systemic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Hypothetical (dashed lines) local responses, generation of signals and transport processes and detected (full line) systemic responses are demonstrated. For details see the text.The question is how do the physical (electrical and/or hydraulic) and chemical signals act? They may independently induce specific elements of systemic responses. However, they are more likely to act in a coordinated, interactive fashion. In this scenario (see Fig. 1), within first minutes after the local burning, hydraulic surge transmitted basipetally and acropetally through the xylem would transport chemicals released at the wound site (hydraulic dispersal¹⁹) and evoke changes in the ion fluxes in surrounding living cells leading to the local electrical activity.^12,13 The hypothesis of hydraulic dispersal is supported by our preliminary experiments with the fluorescent dye Rhodamine B applied on cut petiole of the upper leaf of tobacco plants showing that solutes can be rapidly transported (within minutes) basipetally following wounding.The rapid kinetics and transient character of ABA accumulation¹⁴ suggest that the main transport mechanism is the hydraulic dispersal in xylem. The participation of ABA in the generation of systemic electrical activity and/or vice versa cannot be ruled out.^8,20A rapid hydraulically driven transport of chemicals in the xylem of wounded plant in a reversed (basipetal) direction^19,21 to transpiration stream is not generally accepted. Exposing of leaves of undamaged plants to radioactive labelled molecules to determine the speed of chemical signal transport could be misrepresent, because hydraulic signal is not generated in undamaged plants and then the detected transport speed is too slow. Moreover, previous work²² demonstrated that neither the mass flow itself, nor the associated pressure changes induce the systemic response (the proteinase inhibitor activity). Thus, the efficacy of chemical agents in rapid systemic signaling seems to depend on transport by the mass flows associated with hydraulic signals.¹⁹However, hydraulic dispersal acts only for minutes, until all water released at the wound site is exhausted.²¹ A requirement for hydraulic dispersal of any solute is its presence in the wounded tissue at the time of wounding.¹⁹ Detected slower kinetics of JA accumulation than in the case of ABA and the huge rise of JA levels¹⁴ indicate a systemic accumulation of JA also by some additional processes.Does additional JA accumulation result from de-novo synthesis in undamaged leaves as a response to physical signal or does it result from a JA transport from the wounded leaves? In the longer time-frame the phloem transport²³ should also be considered. Experiments with tomato plants have shown that de novo JA synthesis in distant leaves is not required for the systemic response and that biosynthesis of JA at the wound site is necessary for the generation of a systemic signal.⁷ Indeed, a short-term increase in endogenous concentrations of JA has been detected in wounded tissue in Nicotiana sylvestris⁹ and rice.¹⁰However, a rapid burst in the systemic JA accumulation found in our experiments¹⁴ would implicate an ultra-rapid and extreme JA accumulation at the wound site before its transport. The systemic JA accumulation (within 1 hour¹⁴) preceded the generation of enzymes involved in the JA biosynthesis in the wounded leaf.Thus, several processes are suggested to play a role in the ultra-rapid and huge JA accumulation:

1. initiation of JA accumulation by preexisting enzymes,²⁴
2. fast release of free JA from its storage pools in cells (e.g., JA-conjugates²⁵),
3. direct uptake of elicitors (JA) by the phloem of the wounded leaf and exchange between the xylem and phloem as a consequence of severe wounds,²⁶
4. the mass flow (containing remaining JA) driven mainly acropetally in the xylem by transpiration after damping the hydraulic surge,²¹
5. JA accumulation evoked by the fast transmitting physical (electrical or hydraulic) signal that leads to imbalances in ion fluxes,^8,12,27
6. JA accumulation (and subsequent transport) directly in the phloem, where JA biosynthetic enzymes are located (at least in tomato²⁴),
7. volatile chemical compounds (methylester of JA) spreading in the surrounding air of wounded leaf could serve as signaling molecules and sources of JA.^25,28

The relevance of the above mentioned mechanisms should be checked by further research. Complex quantitative and kinetic analysis of JA and ABA content, levels of its biosynthetic derivatives (also volatiles in the surrounding air) and simultaneous physical signal detection in wounded and distant unwounded tissues would fill the remaining void about their role and interactions in the wound signal transduction networks. In addition, a suppression of other signaling pathways with similar transport kinetics (e.g., volatile compounds transmission, systemin and oligosaccharides generation and/or transport, using mutant plants) would be useful.Substantial similarity between the rapid physical (electrical) signaling in animal nervous system compared with the physical (electrical) signaling in plants has already been reported.^29,30 Interaction of chemical and electrical signals is the process well documented for post-synaptic events in animals. Our data now strengthen the role of chemical signals next to the role of physical signals in plants in the rapid systemic wound response; such a role of chemicals in plants was often underestimated up to now.     

A new function for odorant receptors: MOR23 is necessary for normal tissue repair in skeletal muscle

Myofibers with an abnormal branching cytoarchitecture are commonly found in various neuromuscular diseases as well as after severe muscle injury. These aberrant myofibers are fragile and muscles containing a high percentage of these myofibers are weaker and more prone to injury. To date the mechanisms and molecules regulating myofiber branching have been obscure. Recent work analyzing the role of mouse odorant receptor 23 (MOR23) in muscle regeneration revealed that MOR23 is necessary for proper skeletal muscle regeneration in mice as loss of MOR23 leads to increased myofiber branching. Further studies demonstrated that MOR23 expression is induced when muscle cells were extensively fusing and plays an important role in controlling cell migration and adhesion. These data demonstrate a novel role for an odorant receptor in tissue repair and identify the first molecule with a functional role in myofiber branching.Key words: muscle regeneration, odorant receptor, olfactory receptor, MOR23, myofiber splitting, myofiber branching, myoblast, fusion, myotube, olfr16Skeletal muscle is characterized by an extensive ability to regenerate after injury due to trauma or disease. Muscle regeneration results from a finely orchestrated series of steps that are spatially and temporally regulated, many of which are not understood. Elucidation of the mechanisms that regulate muscle regeneration may be beneficial for enhancing the rate or extent of muscle regeneration in injury, disease or age.Skeletal muscle is composed of myofibers, which are long cylindrical cells containing hundreds of myonuclei in a common cytoplasm (Fig. 1). Each myofiber is surrounded by a basal lamina sheath; between the myofiber and the basal lamina lie myogenic stem cells called satellite cells. When muscle is injured, myofibers degenerate and satellite cells proliferate to give rise to progeny myoblasts. Myoblasts differentiate and undergo migration, adhesion and fusion to form regenerated myofibers and normal tissue architecture is restored. In many neuromuscular diseases muscle regeneration is aberrant and various abnormalities, such as variation in myofiber size, decreased myofiber number, fibrosis and branched myofibers, are observed. In the clinical literature, branched myofibers are more commonly referred to as “split myofibers.”Open in a separate windowFigure 1Myofiber growth during normal muscle regeneration. (A) Myofibers contain many myonuclei within a common cytoplasm and are surrounded by a basal lamina sheath. Underneath the basal lamina lie satellite cells, myogenic stem cells responsible for muscle regeneration. (B) Myofiber degeneration leads to activation of quiescent satellite cells and their reentry into the cell cycle. Their progeny myoblasts proliferate to yield a pool of progenitor cells. (C) Myoblasts differentiate and undergo migration, adhesion and fusion to form nascent myofibers within the original basal lamina sheath. Additional myoblasts fuse with these newly formed myofibers and the myofiber will continue to grow in size. (D) At later time points regenerated myofibers are similar in size to undamaged myofibers but contain centrally located myonuclei, a hallmark of a regenerated myofiber.Branched myofibers are malformed cells which, instead of having a normal cylindrical shape, contain one or more offshoots of small daughter myotubes contiguous with the parent myofiber (Fig. 2). Branched myofibers can be simple with only one branch (Fig. 2A) or complex with many anastomosing branches resembling a gnarled tree root (Fig. 2B).¹ In myofibers with complex cytoarchitecture, individual branches can persist up to hundreds of microns and then eventually recombine with the parent myofiber. Each daughter branch is enclosed in its own basal lamina, which is contiguous with the basal lamina of the parent myofiber.² The frequency of branched myofibers in rodent muscle under normal conditions is low, on the order of 0.003%.³ However, the frequency in both rodent and human muscle is increased in response to hypertrophy^4,5 as well as regeneration due to induced injury,^6–8 muscle transplantation,^9,10 or muscular dystrophy.^1,11–16 In mdx mice, a model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, up to 65–90% of myofibers by 7 months and older display this abnormal branched morphology compared to 6–17% of myofibers at 1–3 months of age.^12–14 Branched myofibers display functional abnormalities such as alterations in myofiber calcium signaling.¹³ Additionally, isolated branched myofibers are more prone to rupture at branches during stimulation¹⁷ and mdx muscles containing a high percentage of branched myofibers are more vulnerable to contraction-induced injury.^12,14 Thus, decreasing the number of branched myofibers would likely be beneficial to muscle function.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Myofiber branching during aberrant muscle regeneration. (A) Phase contrast microscopy of a normal (left) and a branched (right) myofiber. The branched myofiber contains one branch at the end of the myofiber. (B) Schematic diagrams of myofibers with more complex patterns of branching than depicted in (A).Although branched myofibers have been reported in literature for over 100 years, the mechanism by which they arise is unknown and no causative molecules have been identified. The aberrant cytoarchitecture of branched myofibers likely arises from incomplete fusion of small myotubes during muscle regeneration⁸ though direct proof is lacking. Evidence in favor of these malformed myofibers arising from abortive regenerative processes includes the expression of neonatal myosin, a marker of early muscle regeneration, in the small branches.¹³ That these branches are newly formed is further suggested by the presence of centrally located nuclei,^13,18 a hallmark of regenerated myofibers. The observation that during muscle regeneration multiple small myotubes can form within the old basal lamina sheath^8,16,19 leads credence to the idea that aberrant fusion of such small myotubes underlies generation of branched myofibers. Indeed, electron microscopic studies support the ability of myotubes to fuse with one another in vivo;²⁰ myotubes readily fuse with one another in vitro.²¹ Recent studies of odorant receptor function during muscle regeneration in mice¹⁸ have identified the first molecule with a functional role in controlling myofiber branching and suggest that defects in muscle cell migration and/or adhesion may underlie the genesis of these branches.     

Tissue-type specific systemin perception and the elusive systemin receptor

Systemin is a wound signaling peptide from tomato that is important for plant defenses against herbivory. The systemin receptor was initially identified as the tomato homolog of the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1, but genetic evidence argued against this finding. However, we found that BRI1 may function as an inappropriate systemin binding protein that does not activate the systemin signaling pathway. Here we provide evidence that systemin perception is localized in a tissue-type specific manner. Mesophyll protoplasts were not sensitive to systemin, while they responded to other elicitors. We hypothesize that the elusive systemin receptor is a protein with high similarity to BRI1 which is specifically localized in vascular tissue like the systemin precursor prosystemin. Binding of systemin to BRI1 may be an artifact of transgenic BRI1-overexpressing plants, but does not take place in wild type tomato cells.Key words: systemin, systemin receptor, brassinosteroids, BRI1, BRL, protoplastsSystemin is thought to be processed from its precursor prosystemin upon insect attack and wounding of tomato leaves. Strong evidence has been gathered for an important role of (pro-)systemin in the activation of defenses against insects, and the underlying signaling pathway has been studied in detail.¹ However, the perception of systemin is controversial. Meindl et al.² and Scheer and Ryan³ identified high affinity, saturable, reversible and specific cell surface binding sites on Solanum peruvianum suspension-cultured cells which are known to be highly sensitive to systemin.⁴ A purification approach using a photoaffinity systemin analog identified a 160 kDa protein as the systemin receptor (SR160).⁵ Follow-up studies showed that overexpression of tomato 35S::SR160 in systemin-insensitive tobacco plants conferred systemin sensitivity to tobacco.⁶ Surprisingly, SR160 turned out to be the tomato homolog of the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1,⁷ which raised many questions as to the functionality of a receptor for two structurally and functionally diverse ligands. It was then shown in two independent papers that a null mutant for tomato BRI1, cu-3, exhibited a normal response to systemin.^8,9 This was strong evidence that SR160/BRI1 does not represent the functional systemin receptor. Our recent data added a peculiar twist to this story. We found that overexpression of tomato BRI1 in tobacco suspension-cultured cells resulted in binding of a fluorescently labeled systemin to the plasma membranes of the transgenic tobacco cells, but not to wild type cells. Surprisingly, this did not result in BRI1-dependent signal transduction and activation of a defense response, although we detected weak BRI1-independent signaling responses to systemin.¹⁰ Together with the identification of BRI1 as the systemin receptor by Scheer and Ryan,⁵ the simplest explanation for this phenomenon is that BRI1 is a systemin binding protein, but not the physiological systemin receptor.Therefore and for other reasons, we suggested that the true systemin receptor may be a protein with very similar properties as BRI1, e.g., a homolog of the BRI1-like (BRL) proteins. The purification strategy employed by Scheer and Ryan5 may have resulted in binding of a photoaffinity-systemin derivative to BRI1 and one or more BRL proteins. Since BRLs and BRI1 have a very similar MW, multiple bands on a SDS-PAGE would not be detectable.Here, we would like to add another aspect of systemin perception. We provide evidence for tissue-specific systemin sensitivity and discuss how this may affect systemin binding to BRI1 and the elusive systemin receptor. Prosystemin is only present in phloem parenchyma cells.¹¹ It can be surmised that the systemin receptor is located close to these cells. Systemin perception results in JA synthesis in companion cells of vascular bundles.¹² Since JA or a JA derivative is the most likely phloem-mobile candidate for a systemic long-distance wound signal, it is thought that JA is moving from companion cells into sieve cells to reach distant parts of the plant for upregulation of wound response genes in leaf cells, including mesophyll cells.^13–15Here, we tested the hypothesis that mesophyll cells lack systemin perception. We generated mesophyll protoplasts from tomato leaf material as well as protoplasts from S. peruvianum suspension-cultured cells, the same cell line that had been used for the purification of SR160/BRI1 and is known to be highly sensitive to systemin. Mesophyll protoplasts showed increased phosphorylation of MAP kinases (MPKs) in response to the elicitors flg22 and chitosan, bacterial and fungal MAMPs, respectively. However, they did not respond to systemin. In contrast, the S. peruvianum protoplasts did respond to systemin and to flg22, demonstrating that the protoplasting procedure did not compromise the systemin perception mechanism (Fig. 1). Immunocomplex kinase assays with specific antibodies against tomato MPK2 produced similar results (data not shown). Since flg22, chitosan and systemin activated the same MPKs (Fig. 1), our data indicate that systemin perception is absent in mesophyll protoplasts. Our leaf protoplasting protocol is a modification of the protocol by Yoo et al. which results in the generation of mesophyll protoplasts.¹⁶ In contrast, suspension-cultured cells do not normally represent specific cell types and it is not known why the S. peruvianum cells are highly sensitive to systemin.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Absence of systemin-induced MPK phosphorylation in mesophyll cells. Protoplasts were generated (protocol available upon request) from S. peruvianum suspension-cultured cells and from S. lycopersicum cv. MicroTom leaves. After a 1.5 hour recovery phase on ice, protoplasts were resuspended in WI medium (0.5 M mannitol, 5 mM ME S pH 5.7, 20 mM KCl), recovered for 1 hour in non-stick tubes with constant rotation on a rotary shaker at room temperature, and then treated with either water (con), 10 nM systemin (sys), 100 nM flg22, or 2.5 µg/ml chitosan (from crab shells—chi) for 10 min at room temperature. Protoplasts were analyzed for MPK phosphorylation by immunoblotting using an anti-phospho-ER K antibody (phospho-p44/42 MA PK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204); D13.14.4E; Cell Signaling Technology) at a dilution of 1:2,000. This antibody recognizes MPKs that are phosphorylated on either the Thr and Tyr or on only the Thr within the TE Y phosphorylation motif which is conserved among plant and metazoan MPKs. It is known to recognize the tobacco MPKs SIPK and WIPK²¹ and Arabidopsis MPK6 and MPK3,²² the orthologs of tomato MPK1/2 and MPK3.²³ Bands were visualized as described.¹⁰ Proteins on membranes were stained with Ponceau S to demonstrate equal loading.Intriguingly, BRL1, BRL2 and BRL3 are expressed in the vasculature and function in vascular pattern formation in Arabidopsis, while BRI1 is ubiquitously expressed in dividing and elongating cells. BRL3 is even specifically expressed in phloem cells.¹⁷ This matches the highly specific localization of prosystemin in the phloem parenchyma cells.^11,18 The highest BRI1 expression is found in growing parts of young leaves^17,19 while prosystemin is specifically present in the phloem parenchyma cells throughout all developmental stages.¹¹ In this context, it is also interesting to note that application of systemin to tomato plants via the cut stem results in rapid and strong MPK activation. In this assay, systemin is delivered to leaf cells via the transpiration stream and therefore present in vascular tissue.²⁰Based on the combined evidence, we propose that the true systemin receptor is a BRL or similar protein which is expressed in phloem cells in the vicinity of the parenchyma cells that express prosystemin, but not in mesophyll cells. Because of the similarity between BRLs and BRI1, BRI1 was erroneously identified as the systemin receptor. Inappropriate binding of systemin to BRI1 is consistent with the high similarity between BRI1 and BRLs. However, because of the tissue-specificity of the systemin signaling pathway, inappropriate binding of systemin to BRI1 may rarely occur in wild type plants and may not pose an interference problem for either systemin or brassinosteroid signaling.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts is a light-dependent reversible response

Co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts in plant cells has long been noticed as beneficial interactions of the organelles to active photosynthesis. Recently, we have found that mitochondria in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana expressing mitochondrion-targeted green fluorescent protein (GFP) change their distribution in a light-dependent manner. Mitochondria occupy the periclinal and anticlinal regions of palisade cells under weak and strong blue light, respectively. Redistributed mitochondria seem to be rendered static through co-localization with chloroplasts. Here we further demonstrated that distribution patterns of mitochondria, together with chloroplasts, returned back to those of dark-adapted state during dark incubation after blue-light illumination. Reversible association of the two organelles may underlie flexible adaptation of plants to environmental fluctuations.Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, blue light, chloroplast, green fluorescent protein, mesophyll cell, mitochondrion, organelle positioningHighly dynamic cell organelles, mitochondria, are responsible not only for energy production, but also for cellular metabolism, cell growth and survival as well as gene regulations.^1,2 Appropriate intracellular positioning and distribution of mitochondria contribute to proper organelle functions and are essential for cell signaling.^3,4 In plant cells operating photosynthesis, the co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts has been a well known phenomenon for a long period of time.^5,6,7 Physical contact of mitochondria with chloroplasts may provide a means to transfer genetic information from the organelle genome,⁸ as well as to exchange metabolite components; a process required for the maintenance of efficient photosynthesis.^9,10,11Using Arabidopsis thaliana stably expressing mitochondrion-targeted GFP,¹² we have recently examined a different aspect of mitochondria positioning. Although mitochondria in leaf mesophyll cells are highly motile under dark condition, mitochondria change their intracellular positions in response to light illumination.¹³ The pattern of light-dependent positioning of mitochondria seems to be essentially identical to that of chloroplasts.¹⁴ Mitochondria occupy the periclinal regions under weak blue light (wBL; 470 nm, 4 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹) and the anticlinal regions under strong blue light (sBL; 100 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹), respectively. A gradual increase in the number of static mitochondria located in the vicinity of chloroplasts in the periclinal regions with time period of wBL illumination clearly demonstrates that the co-localization of these two organelles is a light-induced phenomenon.¹³In the present study, to ask whether the light-dependent positioning of mitochondria is reversible or not, a time course of mitochondria redistribution was examined transferring the sample leaves from light to dark conditions. The representative results (Fig. 1) clearly show that mitochondria re-changed their positions within several hours of dark treatment. Immediately after dark adaptation, mitochondria in the palisade mesophyll cells were distributed randomly throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A and ^{ref. 13}). Chloroplasts were distributed along the inner periclinal walls and the lower half of the anticlinal walls. On the contrary, mitochondria accumulated along the outer (Fig. 1B) and inner periclinal walls when illuminated with wBL. Chloroplast position was also along the outer and inner periclinal walls. Many of the mitochondria located near the chloroplasts lost their motility. When wBL-illuminated leaves were transferred back to dark condition, the numbers of mitochondria and chloroplasts present on the periclinal regions began to decrease within several hours (Fig. 1C). After 10 h dark treatment, distribution patterns of mitochondria as well as chloroplasts almost recovered to those of dark-adapted cells (Fig. 1D).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of mitochondria and chloroplasts on the outer periclinal regions of palisade mesophyll cells of A. thaliana under different light conditions. Mitochondria (green; GFP) and chloroplasts (red; chlorophyll autofluorescence) were visualized with confocal microscopy after dark adaptation (A), immediately after wBL (470 nm, 4 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹) illumination for 4 h (B), after dark treatment for 6 h (C) and 10 h (D) following the 4-h wBL illumination, respectively. Bar = 50 µm.To our knowledge, this may be the first report that directly demonstrates that wBL regulates mitochondria and chloroplast positioning in a reversible manner, though the nuclei in A. thaliana leaf cells were also found to reverse their positions when transferred from sBL to dark conditions.¹⁵ Reversible regulation of organelle positioning in leaf cells should play critical roles in adaptation of plants to highly fluctuating light conditions in the nature. Since distribution patterns of mitochondria under wBL and sBL are identical to those of chloroplasts, we can assume that phototropins, the BL receptors for chloroplast photo-relocation movement,¹⁶ may have some role in the redistribution of mitochondria. On the other hand, we also found that red light exhibited a significant effect on mitochondria positioning (Islam et al. 2009), suggesting an involvement of photosynthesis. These possibilities are now under investigation.     

pH signature for the responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to external stimuli

Environmental and developmental signals can elicit differential activation of membrane proton (H⁺) fluxes as one of the primary responses of plant and fungal cells. In recent work,¹ we could determine that during the presymbiotic growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi specific domains of H⁺ flux are activated by clover root factors, namely host root exudates or whole root system. Consequently, activation on hyphal growth and branching were observed and the role of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase was investigated. The specific inhibitors differentially abolished most of hyphal H⁺ effluxes and fungal growth. As this enzyme can act in signal transduction pathways, we believe that spatial and temporal oscillations of the hyphal H⁺ fluxes could represent a pH signature for both early events of the AM symbiosis and fungal ontogeny.Key words: H⁺-specific vibrating probe, pH signatures, arbuscular mycorrhiza, pH signalling, Gigaspora margaritaThe 450-million-year-old symbiosis between the majority of land plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi is one of the most ancient, abundant and ecologically important symbiosis on Earth.^2,3The development of AM interaction starts before the physical contact between the host plant roots and the AM fungus. The hyphal growth and branching are induced by the root factors exudated by host plants, followed by the formation of appressorium leading to the hyphal penetration in the root system. These root factors seems to be specifically synthesized by host plants, since exudates from non-host plants are not able to promote neither hyphal differentiation nor appressorium formation.^4,5 Most root exudates contain several host signals or better, active compounds including flavonoids^6,19 and strigolactones,^7,8 however many of them are not yet known.Protons (H⁺) may have an important role on the fungal growth and host signal perception.¹ In plant and fungal cells, H⁺ can be pumped out through two different mechanisms: (1) the activity of the P-type plasma membrane (PM) H⁺-ATPase⁹ and (2) PM redox reactions.¹⁰ The proportional contribution from both mechanisms is not known, but in most plant cells the PM H⁺-ATPase seems to be the major responsible by the H⁺ efflux across plasma membrane. AM Fungal cells also energize their PM using P-type H⁺-pumps quite similar to the plant ones. Indeed, some genes codifying isoforms of P-type H⁺-ATPase have been isolated of AM fungi,^11–13 and AM fungal ATP hydrolysis activity was shown by cytochemistry, localized mainly in the first 70 µm from the germ tube tip.¹⁴ This structural evidence correlates with data obtained by H⁺-specific vibrating probe (Fig. 1A and B), which indicates that the H⁺ efflux in Gigaspora margarita is more intense in the subapical region of the lateral hyphae¹ (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the correlation between the cytosolic pH profile previously obtained by Jolicoeur et al.,¹⁵ with the H⁺ efflux pattern (erythrosine-dependent), seems to clearly indicate that an active PM H⁺-ATPase takes place at the subapical hyphal region. Using orthovanadate, we could show that those H⁺ effluxes are susceptible mainly in the subapical region, but no effect in the apical was found.¹ Recently, a method to use fluorescent marker expression in an AM fungus driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal promoters was published.³¹ It could be adjusted as an alternative to measure “in vivo” PM H⁺-ATPase expression in AM fungal hyphae and their responses to root factors.³¹Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) H⁺ flux profile along growing secondary hyphae of G. margarita in the presence (open squares) or absence (closed squares) of erythrosin B and its correlation with cytosolic pH (pHc) data described by Jolicoeur et al.,¹⁵ (dotted line). Dotted area depicts the region with higher susceptibility to erythrosin B. (B) ion-selective electrode near to AM fungal hyphae. (C) Stimulation on hyphal H⁺ efflux after incubation with root factors or whole root system. R, roots; RE, root exudates; CO₂, carbon dioxide; CWP, cell wall proteins; GR24, synthetic strigolactone. The medium pH in all treatment was monitored and remained about 5.7, including with prior CO₂ incubation. Means followed by the same letter are statistically equal by Duncan''s test at p < 5%.The H⁺ electrochemical gradient generated by PM H⁺-ATPases provides not only driving force for nutrient uptake,^9,16 but also can act as an intermediate in signal transduction pathways.¹⁸ The participation of these H⁺ pumps in cell polarity and tip growth of plant cells was recently reported,²⁷ addressing their crucial role on apical growth.²⁸ Naturally, in the absence of root factors the AM fungi have basal metabolic^8,21–23 and respiratory activity.²⁴ However when root signals are recognized and processed by AM fungal cells they might become activated.²² We thus searched for pH signatures that could reflect the alterations on fungal metabolism in response to external stimuli. In fact, preliminary analyses from our group demonstrate that AM fungal hyphae increase their H⁺ efflux in response not only to root exudates recognition, but also to other root factors (Fig. 1C). The incubation for 30 min of AM fungal hyphae with several root factors induces hyphal H⁺ efflux similar to the response to intact root system (5 days of incubation). The major increases were found with 1% CO₂ (750%) followed by root cell wall proteins (221%), root exudates (130%) and synthetic strigolactone (5%) (Fig. 1C). Those stimulations could define the transition from the state without root signals to the presymbiotic developmental stage (Fig. 1C). In the case of CO₂, the incorporation of additional carbon could represent a new source of energy, since CO₂ dark fixation takes place in Glomus intraradices germ tubes.^22,25Interestingly, after the treatment with synthetic strigolactone (10⁻⁵ M GR24), no significant stimulation was found compared to the remaining factors (Fig. 1C). It opens the question if the real effect of strigolactone is restrict to hyphal branching and does not intervene in very fast response pathways. Likewise, strigolactones need additional time to exhibit an effect, as recently discussed by Steinkellner et al.,²⁶ However, at the moment, no comprehensive electrophysiological analyses are presently available separating the effects of strigolactone and some flavonoids in AM fungal hyphae.The next target of our work is the study of ionic responses of single germ tubes or primary hyphae to root factors (Fig. 2). As reported by Ramos et al.,¹ we have been observing that the pattern of ion fluxes at the apical zone of primary hyphae is differentiated from secondary or lateral hyphae. In the primary, two interesting responses were detected in the absence of root factors: (1) a “dormant Ca²⁺ flux” and (2) Cl⁻ or anion fluxes at the same direction of H⁺ ions, suggesting a possible presence of H⁺/Cl⁻ symporters at the apex, similarly to what occurs in root hairs (Fig. 2).³⁰ In the presence of root factors such as root exudates the stimulated influxes of Cl⁻ (anion), H⁺, Na⁺ and effluxes of K⁺ and Ca²⁺ are activated. It can explain why the AM fungi hyphal tips are depolarized^20,29 during the period without root signals—“asymbiosis”—as long as K⁺ efflux and H⁺ influx occur simultaneously. Indeed, H⁺ as well as Ca²⁺ ions may act as second messengers, where extra and intracellular transient pH changes are preconditions for a number of processes, including gravity responses and possibly in plant-microbe interactions.^17,30Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ion dynamics in the apex of primary hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. It represents the Stage 1 described in Ramos et al.¹ After treatment with root factors, an activation of Ca²⁺ efflux is observed at the hyphal apex.Clearly, further data on the mechanism of action of signaling molecules such as strigolactones over the signal transduction and ion dynamics in AM fungi will be very important to improve our understanding of the molecular bases of the mycorrhization process. Future studies are necessary in order to provide basic knowledge of the ion signaling mechanisms and their role on the response of very important molecules playing at the early events of AM symbiosis.