Biochemical characterization of the DNA substrate specificity of Werner syndrome helicase

Werner syndrome is a hereditary premature aging disorder characterized by genome instability. The product of the gene defective in WS, WRN, is a helicase/exonuclease that presumably functions in DNA metabolism. To understand the DNA structures WRN acts upon in vivo, we examined its substrate preferences for unwinding. WRN unwound a 3'-single-stranded (ss)DNA-tailed duplex substrate with streptavidin bound to the end of the 3'-ssDNA tail, suggesting that WRN does not require a free DNA end to unwind the duplex; however, WRN was completely blocked by streptavidin bound to the 3'-ssDNA tail 6 nucleotides upstream of the single-stranded/double-stranded DNA junction. WRN efficiently unwound the forked duplex with streptavidin bound just upstream of the junction, suggesting that WRN recognizes elements of the fork structure to initiate unwinding. WRN unwound two important intermediates of replication/repair, a 5'-ssDNA flap substrate and a synthetic replication fork. WRN was able to translocate on the lagging strand of the synthetic replication fork to unwind duplex ahead of the fork. For the 5'-flap structure, WRN specifically displaced the 5'-flap oligonucleotide, suggesting a role of WRN in Okazaki fragment processing. The ability of WRN to target DNA replication/repair intermediates may be relevant to its role in genome stability maintenance.     

Unwinding of unnatural substrates by a DNA helicase

Helicases separate double-stranded DNA into single-stranded DNA intermediates that are required during replication and recombination. These enzymes are believed to transduce free energy available from ATPase activity to unwind the duplex and translocate along the nucleic acid lattice. The nature of enzyme-substrate interactions between helicases and duplex DNA substrates has not been well-defined. Most helicases require a single-stranded DNA overhang adjacent to duplex DNA in order to initiate unwinding. The strand containing the overhang is referred to as the loading strand whereas the complementary strand is referred to as the displaced strand. We have investigated the interactions between a DNA helicase and the DNA substrate by replacing the displaced strand with a nucleic acid mimic, peptide nucleic acid (PNA). PNA is capable of forming duplex structures with DNA according to Watson-Crick base pairing rules, but contains a N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine backbone in place of the deoxyribose phosphates. The PNA-DNA hybrids had higher melting temperatures than their DNA-DNA counterparts. Dda helicase, from bacteriophage T4, was able to unwind the DNA-PNA substrates at similar rates as DNA-DNA substrates. The results indicate that the rate-limiting step for unwinding is relatively insensitive to the chemical nature of the displaced strand and the thermal stability of oligonucleotide substrates.     

Increasing the length of the single-stranded overhang enhances unwinding of duplex DNA by bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase

Dda has been shown previously to be active as a monomer for DNA unwinding [Nanduri et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14722] and streptavidin displacement [Byrd and Raney (2004) Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 531]. However, its activity for streptavidin displacement increased as a function of the length of single-stranded DNA. We investigated whether Dda exhibited enhanced DNA unwinding of partially duplex DNA substrates as a function of increasing the length of the single-stranded overhangs. DNA substrates were prepared containing 16 base pairs and single-stranded overhangs of 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 nucleotides. Under single turnover conditions in the presence of excess enzyme, the quantity of DNA unwound increased significantly as the length of the single strand overhang increased. Increased processivity was observed when the DNA substrate contained longer single-stranded overhangs. Equilibrium binding studies indicated that Dda bound to the substrates containing the longer overhangs significantly better than the shorter overhangs. To determine whether the increased processivity for unwinding was due to multiple molecules of Dda or due to the increased binding affinity to the longer overhangs, DNA unwinding was conducted under pre-steady-state conditions, which favor binding of monomeric Dda. Under pre-steady-state conditions, the quantity of product decreased somewhat as the single-stranded length increased, from 12 to 24 nucleotides. Thus, when monomeric Dda is required to translocate longer distances prior to unwinding, processivity is lowered. Taken together, these results indicate that enhanced binding to the longer single-stranded overhangs was not responsible for enhanced processivity under conditions of excess enzyme. Rather, multiple molecules of Dda bound to the same substrate exhibit greater processivity for DNA unwinding.     

Measurement of steady-state kinetic parameters for DNA unwinding by the bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase: use of peptide nucleic acids to trap single-stranded DNA products of helicase reactions

Measurement of steady-state rates of unwinding of double-stranded oligonucleotides by helicases is hampered due to rapid reannealing of the single-stranded DNA products. Including an oligonucleotide in the reaction mixture which can hybridize with one of the single strands can prevent reannealing. However, helicases bind to single-stranded DNA, therefore the additional oligonucleotide can sequester the enzyme, leading to slower observed rates for unwinding. To circumvent this problem, the oligonucleotide that serves as a trap was replaced with a strand of peptide nucleic acid (PNA). Fluorescence polarization was used to determine that a 15mer PNA strand does not bind to the bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase. Steady-state kinetic parameters of unwinding catalyzed by Dda were determined by using PNA as a trapping strand. The substrate consisted of a partial duplex with 15 nt of single-stranded DNA and 15 bp. In the presence of 250 nM substrate and 1 nM Dda, the rate of unwinding in the presence of the DNA trapping strand was 0.30 nM s^–1 whereas the rate was 1.34 nM s^–1 in the presence of the PNA trapping strand. PNA prevents reannealing of single-stranded DNA products, but does not sequester the helicase. This assay will prove useful in defining the complete kinetic mechanism for unwinding of oligonucleotide substrates by this helicase.     

Conformation of fork junction DNA in a complex with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is able to bind fork junction DNA containing a conserved -10 promoter element in a sequence-specific manner, and it is believed that polymerase-fork junction DNA interaction mimics those between the enzyme and the promoter DNA in the open complex. In this report we determined the conformation of polymerase-bound fork junction DNA in solution. A series of distances between sites in the fork junction DNA in complex with polymerase were determined using luminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. A series of fork junction DNAs were prepared containing the luminescent or fluorescent donor probe at the upstream or at the downstream end of the fork DNA and acceptor probes at nine positions within the fork junction DNA. The measured distances were compared with analogous distances in a model reference DNA duplex, and the observed distance differences were used to build a model of the fork junction DNA in a complex with the polymerase. The obtained model revealed an insignificant perturbation of the duplex part of the fork DNA in a complex with the polymerase whereas a sharp kink of DNA was observed at the ds/ss DNA boundary of the fork junction DNA.     

Displacement of a DNA binding protein by Dda helicase

Bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase has recently been shown to be active as a monomer for unwinding of short duplex oligonucleotides and for displacing streptavidin from 3′-biotinylated oligonucleotides. However, its activity for streptavidin displacement and DNA unwinding has been shown to increase as the number of Dda molecules bound to the substrate molecule increases. A substrate was designed to address the ability of Dda to displace DNA binding proteins. A DNA binding site for the Escherichia coli trp repressor was introduced into an oligonucleotide substrate for Dda helicase containing single-stranded overhang. Here we show that a Dda monomer is insufficient to displace the E.coli trp repressor from dsDNA under single turnover conditions, although the substrate is unwound and the repressor displaced when the single-stranded overhang is long enough to accommodate two Dda molecules. The quantity of product formed increases when the substrate is able to accommodate more than two Dda molecules. These results indicate that multiple Dda molecules act to displace DNA binding proteins in a manner that correlates with the DNA unwinding activity and streptavidin displacement activity. We suggest a cooperative inchworm model to describe the activities of Dda helicase.     

Escherichia coli PriA helicase: fork binding orients the helicase to unwind the lagging strand side of arrested replication forks

Escherichia coli PriA is a primosome assembly protein with 3' to 5' helicase activity whose apparent function is to promote resumption of DNA synthesis following replication-fork arrest. Here, we describe how initiation of helicase activity on DNA forks is influenced by both fork structure and by single-strand DNA-binding protein. PriA could recognize and unwind forked substrates where one or both arms were primarily duplex, and PriA required a small (two bases or larger) single-stranded gap at the fork in order to initiate unwinding. The helicase was most active on substrates with a duplex lagging-strand arm and a single-stranded leading-strand arm. On this substrate, PriA was capable of translocating on either the leading or lagging strands to unwind the duplex ahead of the fork or the lagging-strand duplex, respectively. Fork-specific binding apparently orients the helicase domain to unwind the lagging-strand duplex. Binding of single-strand-binding protein to forked templates could inhibit unwinding of the duplex ahead of the fork but not unwinding of the lagging-strand duplex or translocation on the lagging-strand template. While single-strand-binding protein could inhibit binding of PriA to the minimal, unforked DNA substrates, it could not inhibit PriA binding to forked substrates. In the cell, single-strand-binding protein and fork structure may direct PriA helicase to translocate along the lagging-strand template of forked structures such that the primosome is specifically assembled on that DNA strand.     

Regulation of the bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase by Gp32 single-stranded DNA–binding protein

Dda, one of three helicases encoded by bacteriophage T4, has been well-characterized biochemically but its biological role remains unclear. It is thought to be involved in origin dependent DNA replication, recombination-dependent replication, anti-recombination, and recombination repair. The Gp32 protein of bacteriophage T4 plays critical roles in DNA replication, recombination, and repair by coordinating protein components of the replication fork and by stabilizing ssDNA. Previous work demonstrated that stimulation of DNA synthesis by Dda helicase appears to require direct Gp32–Dda protein–protein interactions and that Gp32 and Dda form a tight complex in the absence of ssDNA. Here we characterize the effects of Gp32–Dda physical and functional interactions through changes in the duplex DNA unwinding and ATPase activities of Dda helicase in the presence of different variants of Gp32 and different DNA repair and replication intermediate structures. Results show that Gp32–Dda interactions can be enhancing or inhibitory, depending on the Gp32 domain seen by Dda. Protein–protein interactions with Gp32 stimulate the unwinding activity of Dda, an effect associated with increased turnover of ATP, suggesting a higher rate of ATPase-driven translocation. Dda–Gp32 interactions also promote the unwinding of DNA substrates at higher salt concentrations and in the presence of substrate-bound DNA polymerase. Conversely, the formation of Gp32 clusters on ssDNA can inhibit unwinding, suggesting that Gp32–ssDNA formation sterically regulates which portions of replication and recombination intermediates are accessible for processing by Dda helicase. The data suggest a mechanism of replication fork restart in which Gp32 promotes Dda activity in template switching while preventing premature fork progression.     

Electron microscopy of DNA.helicase-I complexes in the act of strand separation

Electron microscopy was used to characterize the DNA-unwinding reaction catalysed by Escherichia coli DNA helicase I. Linear DNA with 5'-protruding strands as well as single-stranded gaps was incubated, under unwinding assay conditions, with the helicase. E. coli single-stranded-DNA-binding protein (SSB) was added to order the denatured DNA. Up to 70% of the sites of SSB-complexed DNA were observed as forks. The position of the strand-separating enzyme was indicated by a gap in the complex between fork and SSB on that arm which initially provided the binding site. The complex between DNA and helicase varied in length although in all cases it was long enough to comprise several helicase I molecules. A mutant helicase I (helicase I del29) which, unlike the wild-type enzyme, fails to show cooperative DNA-binding behaviour was found to prevent an abnormally short stretch of DNA near the fork from binding SSB. Apparently, one or very few helicase molecules would be sufficient for the opening of a DNA duplex although, typically, the fork is shifted by a tract of helicase I molecules. SSB displaces helicase I from single-stranded DNA but fails to do so from a fork or a single-strand/double-strand junction. The difference is consistent with the observation that SSB does not inhibit the unwinding reaction despite its rapid association with the separated strands. Helicase I unwinds in the 5'-3' direction of the bound strand. Observations so far indicate that the enzyme exploits the single strand at the initial DNA-binding site for orienting its action, and not the complementary, completely base-paired strand.     

RecA protein-facilitated DNA strand breaks. A mechanism for bypassing DNA structural barriers during strand exchange

RecA protein promotes an unexpectedly efficient DNA strand exchange between circular single-stranded DNA and duplex DNAs containing short (50-400-base pair) heterologous sequences at the 5' (initiating) end. The major mechanism by which this topological barrier is bypassed involves DNA strand breakage. Breakage is both strand and position specific, occurring almost exclusively in the displaced (+) strand of the duplex within a 15-base pair region of the heterology/homology junction. Breakage also requires recA protein, ATP hydrolysis, and homologous sequences 3' to the heterology. Although the location of the breaks and the observed requirements clearly indicate a major role for recA protein in this phenomenon, the molecular mechanism is not yet clear. The breakage may reflect a DNA structure and/or some form of structural stress within the DNA during recA protein-mediated DNA pairing which either exposes the DNA at this precise position to the action of a contaminating nuclease or induces a direct mechanical break. We also find that when heterology is located at the 3' end of the linear duplex, strand exchange is halted (without DNA breakage) about 500 base pairs from the homology/heterology junction.     

UV lesions located on the leading strand inhibit DNA replication but do not inhibit SV40 T-antigen helicase activity

DNA replication in eucaryotic cells involves a variety of proteins which synthesize the leading and lagging strands in an asymmetric coordinated manner. To analyse the effect of this asymmetry on the translesion synthesis of UV-induced lesions, we have incubated SV40 origin-containing plasmids with a unique site-specific cis, syn-cyclobutane dimer or a pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4) photoproduct on either the leading or lagging strand template with DNA replication-competent extracts made from human HeLa cells. Two dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis analyses revealed a strong blockage of fork progression only when the UV lesion is located on the leading strand template. Because DNA helicases are responsible for unwinding duplex DNA ahead of the fork and are then the first component to encounter any potential lesion, we tested the effect of these single photoproducts on the unwinding activity of the SV40 T antigen, the major helicase in our in vitro replication assay. We showed that the activity of the SV40 T-antigen helicase is not inhibited by UV-induced DNA lesions in double-stranded DNA substrate.     

Evidence for a functional monomeric form of the bacteriophage T4 DdA helicase. Dda does not form stable oligomeric structures

The active form of many helicases is oligomeric, possibly because oligomerization provides multiple DNA binding sites needed for unwinding of DNA. In order to understand the mechanism of the bacteriophage T4 Dda helicase, the potential requirement for oligomerization was investigated. Chemical cross-linking and high pressure gel filtration chromatography provided little evidence for the formation of an oligomeric species. The specific activity for ssDNA stimulated ATPase activity was independent of Dda concentration. Dda was mutated to produce an ATPase-deficient protein (K38A Dda) by altering a residue within a conserved, nucleotide binding loop. The helicase activity of K38A Dda was inactivated, although DNA binding properties were similar to Dda. In the presence of limiting DNA substrate, the rate of unwinding by Dda was not changed; however, the amplitude of product formation was reduced in the presence of increasing concentrations of K38A Dda. The reduction was between that expected for a monomeric or dimeric helicase based on simple competition for substrate binding. When unwinding of DNA was measured in the presence of excess DNA substrate, addition of K38A Dda caused no reduction in the observed rate for strand separation. Taken together, these results indicate that oligomerization of Dda is not required for DNA unwinding.     

Revealing the DNA Unwinding Activity and Mechanism of Fork Reversal by RecG While Exposed to Variants of Stalled Replication-fork at Single-Molecular Resolution

RecG, belonging to the category of Superfamily-2 plays a vital role in rescuing different kinds of stalled fork. The elemental mechanism of the helicase activity of RecG with several non-homologous stalled fork structures resembling intermediates formed during the process of DNA repair has been investigated in the present study to capture the dynamic stages of genetic rearrangement. The functional characterization has been exemplified through quantifying the response of the substrate in terms of their molecular heterogeneity and dynamical response by employing single-molecule fluorescence methods. An elevated processivity of RecG is observed for the stalled fork where progression of lagging daughter strand is ahead as compared to that of the leading strand. Through precise alteration of its function in terms of unwinding, depending upon the substrate DNA, RecG catalyzes the formation of Holliday junction from a stalled fork DNA. RecG is found to adopt an asymmetric mode of locomotion to unwind the lagging daughter strand for facilitating formation of Holliday junction that acts as a suitable intermediate for recombinational repair pathway. Our results emphasize the mechanism adopted by RecG during its ‘sliding back’ mode along the lagging daughter strand to be ‘active translocation and passive unwinding’. This also provide clues as to how this helicase decides and controls the mode of translocation along the DNA to unwind.     

Analysis of the DNA substrate specificity of the human BACH1 helicase associated with breast cancer

We have investigated the DNA substrate specificity of BACH1 (BRCA1-associated C-terminal helicase). The importance of various DNA structural elements for efficient unwinding by purified recombinant BACH1 helicase was examined. The results indicated that BACH1 preferentially binds and unwinds a forked duplex substrate compared with a duplex flanked by only one single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tail. In support of its DNA substrate preference, helicase sequestration studies revealed that BACH1 can be preferentially trapped by forked duplex molecules. BACH1 helicase requires a minimal 5 ' ssDNA tail of 15 nucleotides for unwinding of conventional duplex DNA substrates; however, the enzyme is able to catalytically release the third strand of the homologous recombination intermediate D-loop structure irrespective of DNA tail status. In contrast, BACH1 completely fails to unwind a synthetic Holliday junction structure. Moreover, BACH1 requires nucleic acid continuity in the 5 ' ssDNA tail of the forked duplex substrate within six nucleotides of the ssDNA-dsDNA junction to initiate efficiently DNA unwinding. These studies provide the first detailed information on the DNA substrate specificity of BACH1 helicase and provide insight to the types of DNA structures the enzyme is likely to act upon to perform its functions in DNA repair or recombination.     

Manipulation of single polymerase-DNA complexes: A mechanical view of DNA unwinding during replication

Comment on: Morin JA, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8115-20.DNA replication requires overcoming the energetic barrier associated with the base pair melting of its double helix and a fine-tuned coordination between the processes of DNA unwinding and DNA replication. One intriguing question that remains poorly understood is the exact mechanism of the coupling of these two reactions. In some organisms, these activities are coupled within the same protein, like in the case of the phage Phi29 DNA polymerase. This polymerase works as a hybrid polymerase-helicase, because it presents an amino acid insertion that together with other protein domains forms a narrow tunnel around the template strand. This topological restriction is similar to the one imposed by hexameric helicases at the fork junction and promotes the separation of the fork ahead.¹ The Phi29 DNA polymerase, therefore, constitutes a simple, good model system to understand the basic mechanistic principles of the coupling between DNA replication and unwinding activities: the polymerase may behave as a “passive” unwinding motor, if translocation of the protein traps transient unwinding fluctuations of the fork, or as an “active” motor, if the polymerase actively destabilizes the duplex DNA at the junction. Therefore, factors that affect the stability of the fork junction, as DNA sequence or mechanical destabilization of the fork, will have a stronger effect on the unwinding kinetics of a “passive” motor than on an “active” one.To determine the DNA unwinding mechanism of the Phi29 DNA polymerase, we used optical tweezers to measure at single molecule level the effect of DNA sequence and destabilizing forces on the fork on the rates of strand displacement (replication and unwinding are tightly coupled, Δx₁, Fig. 1A) and primer extension (replication of the displaced complementary strand without unwinding, Δx₂, Fig. 1A) of two polymerases: the wild-type Phi29 DNA polymerase and a strand displacement deficient variant, which bears a couple of mutations that may affect the stability of the tunnel required for unwinding.² We quantified the free energy of interaction between the polymerase and the DNA fork, ΔG_int, and the range of this interaction, M, through a theoretical analysis of the dependence of the replication, unwinding and pause kinetics on the DNA sequence and force.^3,4Open in a separate windowFigure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design (not to scale). A single DNA hairpin was attached to functionalized beads inside a fluidics chamber. One strand of the hairpin is attached through a dsDNA handle to a bead held in the optical trap (top), while the complementary strand is attached to a bead on top of a mobile micropipette (bottom). At a constant force, after flowing the nucleotides into the reaction chamber, the strand displacement and primer extension rates of the polymerase are detected as a change in distance between the beads, Δx₁ and Δx₂, respectively. (B) Representative replication activity of a single mutant polymerase molecule. Long pauses are observed only during the strand displacement reaction. (C) Mechanistic distinction between passive and active unwinding. The cartoon illustrates the degree of activeness in DNA unwinding of different replicative helicases⁶ and the Phi29 DNA polymerase.Our results show that while the primer extension rates of both polymerases are force- and sequence-independent their average unwinding rates are sensitive to these two variables, although with different intensity. As expected, the dsDNA fork presents a much stronger physical barrier to the mutant polymerase unwinding. Qualitative reasoning might suggest that the observed differences imply different “activeness” of the unwinding mechanism of each polymerase. However, the inclusion of the pause kinetics of each polymerase in our model revealed that they use the same active mechanism; they both destabilize the two nearest base pairs of the fork (M = 2) with an interaction energy ΔG_int = 2 k_BT per base pair. These results suggest that mutations affecting the stability of the tunnel required for unwinding do not decrease the “activeness” of the motor but instead increase the probability of the unwinding mechanism to fail upon encountering a closed fork junction, inducing the entrance of the mutant polymerase into a long-lived inactive pause state (Fig. 1B). These results bring out the importance to consider pause kinetics to accurately quantify the actual unwinding mechanism of the Phi29 DNA polymerase or any other nucleic acid unwinding motor in which pauses are relevant during its operation. The presence of pauses obscures the actual pause-free rates of the motor and can lead to misleading results when they are not properly accounted.Our data are consistent with a model in which the closed template tunnel that wraps around the template strand allows the Phi29 DNA polymerase to maintain a sharp bending of this strand (essential for template reading in all replicative polymerases) and a bending of the complementary strand, due to its steric exclusion, at a closed fork junction. Bending of the two strands would generate mechanical stress at the junction promoting its active destabilization. A less stable tunnel, as in the mutant polymerase, will not be able to keep the mechanical stress at a closed fork junction, in this case the fork pressure would induce loosening of the correct protein-DNA interactions favoring the entrance to a polymerization inactive state.Similar mechanisms for mechanical destabilization of the fork junction can be envisioned for other DNA replication systems in which a DNA polymerase and a helicase work in coordination. In these systems, the leading strand can be sharply bent by the steric exclusion induced by the helicase and by the functional binding of the polymerase generating effective mechanical stress at the fork junction to account for efficient unwinding during replication. These implications are further supported by recent single molecule studies using magnetic tweezers that describe a collaborative coupling of this nature between the activities of the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase and DNA helicase.⁵     

Unwinding of a DNA triple helix by the Werner and Bloom syndrome helicases

Bloom syndrome and Werner syndrome are genome instability disorders, which result from mutations in two different genes encoding helicases. Both enzymes are members of the RecQ family of helicases, have a 3' --> 5' polarity, and require a 3' single strand tail. In addition to their activity in unwinding duplex substrates, recent studies show that the two enzymes are able to unwind G2 and G4 tetraplexes, prompting speculation that failure to resolve these structures in Bloom syndrome and Werner syndrome cells may contribute to genome instability. The triple helix is another alternate DNA structure that can be formed by sequences that are widely distributed throughout the human genome. Here we show that purified Bloom and Werner helicases can unwind a DNA triple helix. The reactions are dependent on nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis and require a free 3' tail attached to the third strand. The two enzymes unwound triplexes without requirement for a duplex extension that would form a fork at the junction of the tail and the triplex. In contrast, a duplex formed by the third strand and a complement to the triplex region was a poor substrate for both enzymes. However, the same duplex was readily unwound when a noncomplementary 5' tail was added to form a forked structure. It seems likely that structural features of the triplex mimic those of a fork and thus support efficient unwinding by the two helicases.     

Characterization of the bacteriophage T4 gene 41 DNA helicase

The T4 gene 41 protein and the gene 61 protein function together as a primase-helicase within the seven protein bacteriophage T4 multienzyme complex that replicates duplex DNA in vitro. We have previously shown that the 41 protein is a 5' to 3' helicase that requires a single-stranded region on the 5' side of the duplex to be unwound and is stimulated by the 61 protein (Venkatesan, M., Silver L. L., and Nossal, N. G. (1982) J. biol. Chem. 257, 12426-12434). The 41 protein, in turn, is required for pentamer primer synthesis by the 61 protein. We now show that the 41 protein helicase unwinds a partially duplex DNA molecule containing a performed fork more efficiently than a DNA molecule without a fork. Optimal helicase activity requires greater than 29 nucleotides of single-stranded DNA on the 3' side of the duplex (analogous to the leading strand template). This result suggests the 41 protein helicase interacts with the leading strand template as well as the lagging strand template as it unwinds the duplex region at the replication fork. As the single-stranded DNA on the 3' side of a short duplex (51 base pairs) is lengthened, the stimulation of the 41 protein helicase by the 61 protein is diminished. However, both the 61 protein and a preformed fork are essential for efficient unwinding of longer duplex regions (650 base pairs). These findings suggest that the 61 protein promotes both the initial unwinding of the duplex to form a fork and subsequent unwinding of longer duplexes by the 41 protein. A stable protein-DNA complex, detected by a gel mobility shift of phi X174 single-stranded DNA, requires both the 41 and 61 proteins and a rNTP (preferably rATP or rGTP, the nucleotides with the greatest effect on the helicase activity). In the accompanying paper, we report the altered properties of a proteolytic fragment of the 41 protein helicase and its effect on in vitro DNA synthesis in the T4 multienzyme replication system.     

Helix-destabilizing properties of the adenovirus DNA-binding protein.

The adenovirus DNA-binding protein (DBP) is a multifunctional protein that is essential for viral DNA replication. DBP binds both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA as well as RNA in a sequence-independent manner. Previous studies showed that DBP does not promote melting of duplex poly(dA-dT) in contrast to prokaryotic single-strand-binding proteins. However, here we show that DBP can displace oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded M13 DNA. Depending upon the DBP concentration, strands of at least 200 nucleotides can be unwound. Although unwinding of short (17-bp), fully duplex DNA is facilitated by DBP, unwinding of larger (28-bp) duplexes is only possible if single-stranded protruding ends are present. These protruding ends must be at least 4 nucleotides long for optimal unwinding, and both 5' and 3' single-stranded overhangs suffice. DBP-promoted strand displacement is sensitive to MgCl2 and NaCl and not dependent upon ATP. Our results suggest that DBP, through formation of a protein chain on the displaced strand, may destabilize duplex DNA ahead of the replication fork, thereby assisting in strand displacement during replication.     

Mcm4,6,7 uses a "pump in ring" mechanism to unwind DNA by steric exclusion and actively translocate along a duplex

Mcm4,6,7 is a ring-shaped heterohexamer and the putative eukaryotic replication fork helicase. In this study, we examine the mechanism of Mcm4,6,7. Mcm4,6,7 binds to only one strand of a duplex during unwinding, corresponding to the leading strand of a replication fork. Mcm4,6,7 unwinding stops at a nick in either strand. The Mcm4,6,7 ring also actively translocates along duplex DNA, enabling the protein to drive branch migration of Holliday junctions. The Mcm4,6,7 mechanism is very similar to DnaB, except the proteins translocate with opposite polarity along DNA. Mcm4,6,7 and DnaB have different structural folds and evolved independently; thus, the similarity in mechanism is surprising. We propose a "pump in ring" mechanism for both Mcm4,6,7 and DnaB, wherein a single-stranded DNA pump is situated within the central channel of the ring-shaped helicase, and unwinding is the result of steric exclusion. In this example of convergent evolution, the "pump in ring" mechanism was probably selected by eukaryotic and bacterial replication fork helicases in order to restrict unwinding to replication fork structures, stop unwinding when the replication fork encounters a nick, and actively translocate along duplex DNA to accomplish additional activities such as DNA branch migration.     

Probing the relationship between RNA-stimulated ATPase and helicase activities of HCV NS3 using 2'-O-methyl RNA substrates

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protein contains an amino terminal protease (NS3 aa. 1-180) and a carboxyl terminal RNA helicase (NS3 aa. 181-631). NS3 functions as a heterodimer of NS3 and NS4A (NS3/4A). NS3 helicase, a nucleic acid stimulated ATPase, can unwind RNA, DNA, and RNA:DNA duplexes, provided that at least one strand of the duplex contains a single-stranded 3' overhang (this strand of the duplex is referred to as the 3' strand). We have used 2'-O-methyl RNA (MeRNA) substrates to study the mechanism of NS3 helicase activity and to probe the relationship between its helicase and RNA-stimulated ATPase activities. NS3/4A did not unwind double-stranded (ds) MeRNA. NS3/4A unwinds hybrid RNA:MeRNA duplex containing MeRNA as the 5' strand but not hybrid duplex containing MeRNA as the 3' strand. The helicase activity of NS3/4A was 50% inhibited by 40 nM single-stranded (ss) RNA but only 35% inhibited by 320 nM ss MeRNA. Double-stranded RNA was 17 times as effective as double-stranded MeRNA in inhibiting NS3/4A helicase activity, while the apparent affinity of NS3/4A for ds MeRNA differed from ds RNA by only 2.4-fold. However ss MeRNA stimulated NS3/4A ATPase activity similar to ss RNA. These results indicate that the helicase mechanism involves 3' to 5' procession of the NS3 helicase along the 3' strand and only weak association of the enzyme with the displaced 5' strand. Further, our findings show that maximum stimulation of NS3 ATPase activity by ss nucleic acid is not directly related to procession of the helicase along the 3' strand.