Nicorandil in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Nicorandil, as an adjunctive therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), had controversial benefits in cardioprotection in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods and Results

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with nicorandil prior to reperfusion therapy with control (placebo or no nicorandil) in patients who suffered from AMI and performed primary PCI. PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases and other sources were searched without language and publication restriction. 14 trials involving 1680 patients were included into this meta-analysis. Nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2 (risk ratio [RR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.79), the Timi frame count (TFC) (mean difference [MD], -5.19; 95% CI: -7.13 to -3.26), increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) (MD, 3.08; 95% CI: 0.79 to 5.36), and reduced the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.76) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (RR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.75). No difference in the pear creatine kinase (CK) value (MD, -290.19; 95% CI: -793.75 to 213.36) or cardiac death (RR, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.09 to 1.67) was observed.

Conclusions

Nicorandil prior to reperfusion is associated with improvement of coronary reflow as well as suppression of ventricular arrhythmia, and further improves left ventricular function in patients who suffered from AMI and underwent primary PCI. But the definite clinical benefits of nicorandil were not found, which may be due to the small sample size of the selected studies.     

Verapamil Reverses Myocardial No-Reflow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

The present study evaluated the efficacy of intracoronary administration of verapamil to attenuate the no-reflow phenomenon following the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with the ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 201 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 12 h from the beginning of the heart attack were included. The no-reflow phenomenon was defined as substantial coronary anterograde flow of TIMI ≤2. Verapamil (100–200 μg) was injected into coronary artery immediately after no-reflow; the coronary arteriography was repeated later. Hundred and ninety-eight patients with STEMI successfully underwent primary PCI, and 246 stents were implanted with the average of 1.2 stents per patient. No-reflow occurred in 25 out of 198 patients (12.6 %). Twenty-one (84 %) patients developed the flow of TIMI ≥3 after intracoronary administration of verapamil, as revealed by repeated coronary angiography. Two patients developed transient hypotension which normalized without treatment within 3–5 min. Three patients showed sinus bradycardia, in one patient there was transient II sinoatrial block, and one patient developed type 1 atrioventricular block. All adverse effects were alleviated after intravenous injection of atropine (0.5–1 mg). In conclusion, the no-reflow phenomenon following primary PCI in patients with STEMI is significantly improved by intracoronary administration of verapamil which is useful to reduce cardiovascular events during operation.     

定量组织速度成像预测心肌梗死PCI 术后心功能不全的研究

目的:应用定量组织速度成像技术(QTVI)检测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死(STEMI)患者左心室收缩功能的改变;评价QTVI指标对该类患者未来发生心力衰竭的预测价值。方法:选择行急诊PCI术治疗的冠状动脉单支病变的急性心肌梗死患者,术后一周测量患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF),LVEF<50%者排除,LVEF≥50%者入选。共38例。并设正常对照组30例。入选者继续测二尖瓣环室间隔侧和左室侧壁侧QTVI曲线上心室收缩期速度峰值(Sa),并计算左室平均收缩期速度峰值(mean Sa)。术后12个月随访,查LVEF。结果:PCI术12个月后有17位患者LEVF<50%,21位患者LEVF≥50%。入选的STEMI者术后7天的左室平均Sa波峰值低于正常对照组。术后12个月出现LVEF减低(<50%)的患者,其术后7天的左室平均Sa波峰值低于PCI术12个月后LVEF正常的患者(P<0.01)。结论:通过QTVI检测二尖瓣环的运动速度能够早期发现单支病变所致的急性心肌梗死患者在急诊PCI术后的左心室功能受损;PCI术后LVEF正常的STEMI患者,术后7天QTVI测得的左室平均Sa波峰值减低可能预示着将来发展为LVEF减低的左心室收缩功能不全。     

血小板与淋巴细胞比率对急性ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后无复 流的预测价值

目的:研究入院时血小板与淋巴细胞比率(Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio,PLR)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardia1 infarction,STEMI)患者冠脉介入治疗后无复流的预测价值。方法:共收集190例急性STEMI患者,发病12小时内并且行PCI(primary coronary intervention)术。按术中TIMI血流分级将病人分为2组:正常复流组(138例)和无复流组(52例),比较两组患者的基本临床资料、实验室检查结果及PCI结果,用Logistic回归分析无复流的预测因素,用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)论证得到PLR预测无复流的最佳临界值及其敏感度和特异度。结果:无复流组PLR显著高于正常复流组(246±98VS 169±108,P0.01)。当PLR=188时,预测无复流的敏感度为70%,特异度为72%。结论:入院时PLR是急性STEMI患者PCI术后无复流的预测因素。     

急性心肌梗死患者冠脉介入治疗后血浆apelin的变化及作用

目的:观察急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者围手术期血浆apelin的表达变化,分析AMI合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血浆apelin的表达与预后的相关性,探讨apelin在冠脉介入治疗(PCI)中的心脏保护作用。方法:72例于2012年2月~8月在我院心内科接受冠状动脉造影确诊为AMI并成功完成PCI的冠心病患者,分别在术前、术后0小时、术后4小时、术后24小时收集血清,酶联免疫吸附法测定血浆apelin-13水平;进一步对糖尿病及非糖尿病AMI患者(每组各20例)进行亚组分析,随访两组患者在术后6个月时主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。结果:AMI患者术后0 h组apelin水平与术前基线水平明显降低(31.54±5.48 vs35.15±6.48 ng/L,P0.05);术后4小时及24小时组apelin水平较术前明显升高(39.65±5.48 vs 35.15±6.48 ng/L,43.93±5.37 vs35.15±6.48 ng/L,P0.05)。糖尿病与非糖尿病组apelin水平术前无明显差异;糖尿病组在术后各时间点的apelin水平均明显高于非糖尿病组(31.12±5.50 vs 29.21±6.53 ng/L,40.57±5.37 vs 33.49±3.89 ng/L,43.50±7.41 vs 34.54±3.52 ng/L,P0.05)。两组术后6个月随访T2DM组LVEF值改善明显高于NT2DM组,但MACCE事件无明显差异。结论:AMI患者PCI术后存在血浆apelin表达的升高,其中糖尿病患者在术后血浆apelin表达较非糖尿病患者明显增高,提示PCI冠脉血运重建可促进糖尿病患者apelin分泌,调节胰岛素抵抗改善预后。     

急性心肌梗死行PCI患者炎症因子的检测及其与预后的关系

目的:探讨急性心肌梗死行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)血清炎症因子的改变及其与预后的关系。方法:选择126例拟行PCI治疗的急性心肌梗死患者为研究对象,比较PCI手术前后血清超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)及肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的改变。同时比较PCI术后3月发生心血管事件患者与未发生心血管事件患者术后12h血清hs-CRP及TNF-α的差别。结果:患者PCI术后血清hs-CRP及TNF-α水平均显著升高,与术前相比差别具有统计学意义(P<0.05);PCI术后3月发生心血管事件患者PCI术后12h血清hs-CRP及TNF-α水平显著高于未发生心血管事件患者(P<0.05);Logistic回归结果显示:hs-CRP及TNF-α与心血管事件发生率显著相关。结论:急性心肌梗死行PCI患者术后发生急性炎症反应,hs-CRP及TNF-α水平升高与患者心血管事件发生密切相关,可作为评估预后的血清学指标。     

Effect of Metformin Treatment on Lipoprotein Subfractions in Non-Diabetic Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Glycometabolic Intervention as Adjunct to Primary Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (GIPS-III) Trial

Objective

Metformin affects low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density (HDL) subfractions in the context of impaired glucose tolerance, but its effects in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI) are unknown. We determined whether metformin administration affects lipoprotein subfractions 4 months after ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Second, we assessed associations of lipoprotein subfractions with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size 4 months after STEMI.

Methods

371 participants without known diabetes participating in the GIPS-III trial, a placebo controlled, double-blind randomized trial studying the effect of metformin (500 mg bid) during 4 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI were included of whom 317 completed follow-up (clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01217307","term_id":"NCT01217307"}}NCT01217307). Lipoprotein subfractions were measured using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at presentation, 24 hours and 4 months after STEMI. (Apo)lipoprotein measures were obtained during acute STEMI and 4 months post-STEMI. LVEF and infarct size were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Metformin treatment slightly decreased LDL cholesterol levels (adjusted P = 0.01), whereas apoB remained unchanged. Large LDL particles and LDL size were also decreased after metformin treatment (adjusted P<0.001). After adjustment for covariates, increased small HDL particles at 24 hours after STEMI predicted higher LVEF (P = 0.005). In addition, increased medium-sized VLDL particles at the same time point predicted a smaller infarct size (P<0.001).

Conclusion

LDL cholesterol and large LDL particles were decreased during 4 months treatment with metformin started early after MI. Higher small HDL and medium VLDL particle concentrations are associated with favorable LVEF and infarct size.     

瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI手术预后的影响

目的:探讨瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者PCI术预后的影响。方法:选择2013年6月-2015年6月我院收治的STEMI患者90例,随机分为研究组与对照组,每组各45例。研究组患者PCI术前及术后均给予瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗,对照组仅在术后给予瑞舒伐他汀治疗。观察并比较两组患者术中慢血流及无复流的发生率,TNI、CK-MB、NT-pro BNP及hs-CRP水平变化,以及左室舒张末期内径、左心房内径、左室射血分数、室间隔厚度。结果:研究组术中慢血流及无复流的发生率显著低于对照组(P0.05);两组患者治疗后TNI、CK-MB、NT-pro BNP、hs-CRP水平均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组治疗后左室舒张末期内径、左心房内径、左室射血分数、室间隔厚度比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗可以有效降低STEMI患者心肌坏死及炎症反应的发生率,改善心室重构,值得临床推广应用。     

比伐卢定联合替罗非班在高血栓负荷拟行PPCI治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用价值

目的:探讨替罗非班与比伐卢定联合治疗在高血栓负荷拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入(PPCI)的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的应用价值。方法:选取我院于2018年3月~2020年3月期间收治的127例高血栓负荷拟行PPCI治疗的STEMI患者。将所有患者按照入院顺序,单号分为对照组(替罗非班治疗),双号分为观察组(比伐卢定联合替罗非班治疗),分别为63例和64例。对比两组术后24 h、术后30 d支架内血栓事件、30 d内的出血事件发生率,对比两组心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)血流分级变化、心功能及肌酸激酶同工酶(CKMB)峰值时间及CKMB峰值,记录两组术后不良心血管事件发生率及住院时间。结果:两组术后24 h、术后30 d均未发生支架内血栓事件,观察组30 d内的出血事件发生率较对照组低(P<0.05)。两组住院时间组间对比无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组术后1个月TIMI血流分级为Ⅲ级的占比高于术前同一分级,TIMI血流分级为0~Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级的占比低于术前同一分级(P<0.05)。观察组术后7 d左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、CKMB峰值小于对照组,左心室射血分数(LVEF)高于对照组,CKMB峰值时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组心血管不良事件总发生率对比无差异(P>0.05)。结论:比伐卢定联合替罗非班治疗高血栓负荷拟行PPCI的STEMI患者,可改善患者心功能,减少心肌损伤,改善TIMI血流分级,同时还可减少30 d内的出血事件发生率。     

高龄（80-89 岁）非ST 段抬高心肌梗死早期 介入治疗的疗效观察

目的:研究调查高龄(80-89岁)非ST段抬高心肌梗死(non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,NSTEMI)患者行早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的有效性。方法:回顾分析2008年8月-2009年10月期间我院住院的66例80-89岁NSTEMI患者,冠状动脉造影检查后45例行PCI术,5例因为左主干病变或者严重的三支病变行冠脉搭桥(CABG)术,其余16例做保守治疗。发病到行介入治疗时间<72h。结果:45例行PCI术中42例成功,再血管化的成功率为63.6%,失败的3例PCI术病人中2例因导丝或球囊未能通过病变,1例为顽固性室速。共植入支架80枚,术后梗死相关动脉血流均达到TIMI2-3级。术后死亡2例(心源性休克、颅内出血各1例),死亡率为4.8%。住院期间出血并发症较高,有4(9.5%)例(穿刺部位血肿2例,消化道、颅内出血各1例)。住院期间无再发心肌梗死,偶发心绞痛2例。结论:穿刺尽管高龄(80-89岁)非ST段抬高心肌梗死冠脉早期介入主要出血事件较多,但可改善住院期间的预后。     

Histopathological Features of Aspirated Thrombi after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Plaque disruption with superimposed thrombus is the predominant mechanism responsible for the onset of acute coronary syndromes. Studies have shown that plaque disruption and thrombotic occlusion are frequently separated in time. We established the histopathological characteristics of material aspirated during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large consecutive ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Thrombus aspiration during primary PCI was performed in 1,362 STEMI patients. Thrombus age was classified as fresh (<1 day), lytic (1–5 days), or organized (>5 day). Further, the presence of plaque was documented. The histopathological findings were related to the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics. Material could be aspirated in 1,009 patients (74%). Components of plaque were found in 395 of these patients (39%). Fresh thrombus was found in 577 of 959 patients (60%) compared to 382 patients (40%) with lytic or organized thrombi. Distal embolization was present in 21% of patients with lytic thrombus compared to 12% and 15% of patients with fresh or organized thrombus.

Conclusions/Significance

Material could be obtained in 74% of STEMI patients treated with thrombus aspiration during primary PCI. In 40% of patients thrombus age is older than 24 h, indicating that plaque disruption and thrombus formation occur significantly earlier than the onset of symptoms in many patients.     

ST 段抬高心肌梗死靶血管长病变急诊介入治疗的安全性及疗效分析

目的:探讨ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(ST-elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者靶血管长病变(病变>25 mm)急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性收集2009年1月-2010年6月因STEMI就诊于沈阳军区总医院并急诊行PCI处理的患者442例,以靶病变长度分为两组,即≤25 mm为短病变组(n=235)和>25mm为长病变组(n=207),均急诊行PCI治疗,分析和比较两组患者术前的基线资料、术中资料及并发症的发生情况、辅助措施(临时起搏、IABP、血栓抽吸装置)应用情况,术后30天、2年电话或临床随访,记录主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiac events,MACE)的发生情况。结果:与短病变组比较,长病变组吸烟者更多(81.6%vs 62.6%,P=0.000);以三支病变偏多(34.8%vs 24.7%,P=0.037);多枚支架使用率更高(1.47±0.63 vs 1.04±0.28,P=0.000),平均支架总长度显著增加(29.80±7.02 mm vs 22.95±5.58mm,P=0.000),手术成功率、术中并发症及辅助措施应用情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),30天及2年随访MACE的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与急诊PCI治疗的STEMI短病变患者对比,长病变患者虽然病变复杂,多枚支架使用率高,平均支架总长度增加,但术中并发症、30天、2年内MACE与短病变患者相当,提示在以药物洗脱支架为主的介入治疗时代,急诊PCI处理STEMI靶血管长病变具有良好的疗效及安全性。     

血小板平均体积与老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者并发心力衰竭的 相关性分析

目的:探讨血小板平均体积(MPV)与老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者住院期间并发心力衰竭(HF)的相关性。方法:收集我院收治的172例老年STEMI患者,按照住院期间是否发生HF分为HF组(n=55例)和非HF组(n=117例),以患者MPV四分位分四组,比较以上各组之间相关指标的差异,用Logistic回归方程分析MVP与患者HF发生的关系。结果:HF组与非HF组在吸烟、发病至入院时间、前壁梗死、血清B型脑钠肽(BNP)、肌钙蛋白I(c Tn I)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、MVP存在统计学差异(P0.05),HF组MVP水平高于非HF组(P0.05);MVP四分位分组之间的心功能指标LVEF和血清BNP、HF发生率存在统计学差异(P0.05),MVP的第四四分位组(Q4组)的HF发生率高于第一分位组及第二四分位组(Q1及Q2组);多因素Logistic回归方程分析显示高水平MPV是老年STEMI患者近期发生心力衰竭的独立危险因素(P0.05);MVP四分位分组中,从Q1组到Q4组发生HF的风险值(OR)依次增高,且Q3及Q4组的OR值具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:高水平MPV与老年STEMI患者住院期间HF发生密切相关,可能是其发生的独立危险因素,应当引起临床关注。     

急性下壁心肌梗死急诊PCI术中应用临时起搏器与阿托品的对比研究

目的：探讨临时起搏器与阿托品在急性下壁心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）中应用的疗效。方法：入选2012 年2 月至2013 年8 月我院收治的发病12 小时内,诊断为急性下壁心肌梗死并接受急诊PCI治疗的患者92 例,依据治疗方法的不同 将病例分为临时起搏组和阿托品组,并对病例进行为期一年的追踪随访,收集患者平均住院天数、平均住院费用、再灌注心律失 常、心肌梗死后心绞痛、心肌梗死后心衰发生率资料。结果：临时起搏组的平均住院天数、平均住院费用、心肌梗死后心绞痛、心肌 梗死后心衰发生率均显著低于阿托品治疗组（P 均<0.05）,阿托品治疗组的再灌注心律失常发生率则明显低于临时起搏组（P<0. 05）。结论：急性下壁心肌梗死急诊PCI中应用临时起搏器,具有治疗成本低,降低心血管事件发生率的优点,而阿托品治疗在改 善再灌注心律失常的疗效上则显著优于临时起搏治疗。     

远端保护装置治疗老年急性ST 段抬高型心肌梗死心肌标志物 变化的研究

目的:探讨应用远端保护装置GuardWire PlusTM治疗老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)对外周血肌钙蛋白(cTnI)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)的影响。方法:将2004年9月至2009年12月在我院行急诊PCI的60例年龄>60岁老年STEMI患者分为远端保护组(GW)和非远端保护组(NGW)。于术前、术后4h、8h、12h、16h、24h、2d、3d、5d分别测定外周血cTnI、CK-MB水平,并比较两组间变化及其峰值水平。结果:两组全部病例均成功植入支架。GW组全部成功放置GuardWire PlusTM远端保护装置。发病后12h两组CK-MB的值有明显差别(P<0.05),并且GW组出现酶峰提前,发病后6h、12h两组的CTNI的值有明显差别(P<0.05),并且GW组出现峰值提前。结论:老年心肌梗死急诊PCI中应用远端保护装置可以缩小梗死面积,改善预后。     

Culprit Vessel Only versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

BackgroundThe best strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD), who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the acute phase, is not well established.ObjectivesOur goal was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing culprit vessel only percutaneous coronary intervention (culprit PCI) with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) for treatment of patients with STEMI and MVD.MethodsPubmed, Elsevier, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were systematically searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing culprit PCI and MV-PCI strategies during the index procedure. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1 (Cochrane Center, Denmark).ResultsFour randomized and fourteen nonrandomized studies involving 39,390 patients were included. MV-PCI strategy is associated with an increased short-term mortality (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.77, p = 0.002), long-term mortality (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.74, p<0.001), and risk of renal dysfunction (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.97, p = 0.03) compared with culprit PCI strategy, while it reduced the incidence of revascularization (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.80 to 3.90, p<0.001).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis supports current guidelines which indicate that the non-culprit vessel should not be treated during the index procedure.     

Irisin 水平与急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后无复流的研究

目的：探讨血清Irisin 水平对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者PCI术后无复流的预测价值。方法：连续收集西京医院心内科因AMI 行急诊PCI治疗的169 例患者的临床及冠脉影像学资料。根据TIMI血流分级,将病人分为两组,正常血流组和无复流组;采用酶 联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测患者血清中Irisin 水平,根据Irisin 水平分为低Irisin 组和高Irisin 组,分析Irisin 与无复流发生的关 系。结果：①169例患者发生无复流40 例,无复流发生率为23.6%（40/169）;②无复流组与正常血流组相比,血清Irisin 水平显著降 低（4766± 1725 ng/mLvs 8125± 2904 ng/mL,P<0.05）;③急性心梗发生后,血浆Irisin 水平逐渐升高,3 小时内组Irisin 水平显著低 于24 小时后组（4050± 1739 ng/mL vs8358± 3042 ng/mL,P<0.05）,且3 小时内组无复流显著高于24 小时后组（71.42%vs 12.9%, P<0.05）;④低Irisin 组中无复流的发生率显著高于高Irisin 组（58.1% vs 11.9%,P<0.05）;⑤多元Logistic 回归显示Irisin 是急诊 PCI术后无复流发生的保护因素(OR:0.861,95%CI:0.793-0.909,P<0.05)。结论：低水平的血清Irisin 能有效预测急性心肌梗死患者 PCI术后无复流的发生,且Irisin 能明显改善PCI术后无复流。     

维拉帕米对急性前壁心肌梗死行急诊PCI术患者再灌注室性心律失常的影响

目的:探讨经指引导管早期应用维拉帕米对急性前壁心肌梗死行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,PCI)患者再灌注室性心律失常的影响。方法:采用单中心、随机对照、前瞻性研究方法。选取2014年5月-2016年11月诊断为急性前壁心肌梗死并于我院行急诊PCI的患者,共纳入162例患者,按随机方法(随机数字表)分成2组,其中治疗组82例,对照组80例。治疗组患者在首次球囊扩张后早期经指引导管内给予维拉帕米(200μg),对照组患者则给予生理盐水。观察再灌注后室性心律失常发生率,PCI术后冠脉血流情况,心肌梗死相关血清指标(CK-MB,cTn I)的峰值,住院期间发生的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。结果:维拉帕米治疗组患者再灌注心律室性失常及无复流的发生率显著低于生理盐水对照组(P0.05);维拉帕米治疗组患者cTnI和CK-MB峰值分别为(46.63±13.77)μg/L和(139.87±35.45)U/L,生理盐水组cTnI和CK-MB峰值为(54.36±12.59)μg/L和(158.34±40.18)U/L,两组比较,P均0.01。MACE事件两组间未见有统计学差异。结论:急性前壁心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术前经导管早期给予维拉帕米不但可显著减少无复流现象,还可显著减少再灌注后室性心律失常的发生,住院期间MACE事件的发生率无显著性差异。     

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), fibrinolysis and the combination of both methods are current therapeutic options for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of PCI after fibrinolysis within 24 hours, which was compared with primary PCI alone and ischemia-guided or delayed PCI. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.30 following the methods described by the Cochrane library.ResultsA total of 16 studies including 10,034 patients were enrolled. As compared with primary PCI alone group, the short-term mortality (5.8% vs 4.5%, RR 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.65) and re-infarction rate (4.1% vs 2.7%, RR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05–2.03) were higher in the immediate PCI group (median/mean time ≤ 2 h after fibrinolysis). However, the short-term mortality and re-infarction rate showed no statistically significant differences in the early PCI group (2–24 hours after fibrinolysis). The rate of major bleeding events was higher both in the immediate PCI (6.3% vs 4.4%, RR 1.43, 95%CI 1.11–1.85) and the early PCI group (6.4% vs 4.4%, RR 1.46, 95%CI 1.03–2.06) as compared with primary PCI alone group. As compared with ischemia-guided or delayed PCI, early PCI was associated with significantly reduced re-infarction (2.4% vs 4.0%, RR 0.61, 95%CI 0.41–0.92) and recurrent ischemia (1.5% vs 5.3%, RR 0.29, 95%CI 0.12–0.70) at short-term. And the reduced re-infarction rate was also observed at long-term.ConclusionsEarly PCI after fibrinolysis, with a relatively broader time for PCI preparation, can bring the similar effects with primary PCI alone and is better than ischemia-guided or delayed PCI in STEMI patients with symptom onset < 12 h who cannot receive timely PCI. However, immediate PCI after fibrinolysis is detrimental.     

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接介入治疗门-囊时间及影响因素探讨

目的:探讨在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中采用直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)方案所用的门-囊(D_2B)时间及其影响因素。方法:选取2014年1月至2016年4月我院收治的行PCI术治疗的180例STEMI患者为研究对象,经患者同意行介入治疗。记录患者院前延迟时间和D_2B时间。通过问卷调查患者的人口统计学资料、临床因素、疾病发生的背景及心理因素等相关资料。以D_2B时间≤126 min为短D_2B组(n=96),126 min为长D_2B组(n=84),采用单因素与多因素logistic回归方法分析D_2B时间的影响因素。结果:所有患者D_2B时间的中位数为126 min,仅有26.7%的患者D_2B时间控制在90 min以内;单因素分析显示,两组患者的突然发作、重视症状、发病时有人在场、症状进展快、节假日住院、入CCU时无症状、门诊就医、应用急救医疗服务体系(EMSS)转运、入CCU时间(6 am-10 pm)、梗前心绞痛及院前延误时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,节假日住院、门诊就医、入CCU无症状、重视症状、应用EMSS转运、入CCU时间(6 am-10 pm)等均为D_2B时间的影响因素(OR=2.62,2.04,1.59,0.52,0.28,0.61,P0.05)。结论:多数STEMI患者的D_2B时间均未达到指南要求,患者、医生、院内接诊机制等因素均与D_2B时间有关。