Extracellular control of cell size

Both cell growth (cell mass increase) and progression through the cell division cycle are required for sustained cell proliferation. Proliferating cells in culture tend to double in mass before each division, but it is not known how growth and division rates are co-ordinated to ensure that cell size is maintained. The prevailing view is that coordination is achieved because cell growth is rate-limiting for cell-cycle progression. Here, we challenge this view. We have investigated the relationship between cell growth and cell-cycle progression in purified rat Schwann cells, using two extracellular signal proteins that are known to influence these cells. We find that glial growth factor (GGF) can stimulate cell-cycle progression without promoting cell growth. We have used this restricted action of GGF to show that, for cultured Schwann cells, cell growth rate alone does not determine the rate of cell-cycle progression and that cell size at division is variable and depends on the concentrations of extracellular signal proteins that stimulate cell-cycle progression, cell growth, or both.     

Oncogenic Met receptor induces cell-cycle progression in Xenopus oocytes independent of direct Grb2 and Shc binding or Mos synthesis, but requires phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Raf signaling

Biological responses of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are mediated by the Met receptor tyrosine kinase. Although HGF is a potent mitogen for a variety of cells, the signals required for cell-cycle progression by the Met/HGF receptor are poorly defined. In this study, we have used the Xenopus oocyte system to define the role of various Met proximal-binding partners and downstream signaling pathways in cell-cycle regulation. We show that cell-cycle progression and activation of MAPK and JNK mediated by the oncogenic Met receptor, Tpr-Met, are dependent on its kinase activity and the presence of the twin phosphotyrosine (Y482 & Y489) residues in its C-terminus, but that the recruitment of Grb2 and Shc adaptor proteins is dispensable, implicating other signaling molecules. However, using Met receptor oncoproteins engineered to recruit specific signaling proteins, we demonstrate that recruitment of Grb2 or Shc adaptor proteins is sufficient to induce cell-cycle progression and activation of MAPK and JNK, while the binding of phospholipase-Cgamma or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase alone fails to elicit these responses. Using various means to block phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phospholipase-Cgamma, MEK, JNK, Mos, and Raf1 activity, we show that unlike the fibroblast growth factor receptor, MEK-dependent and independent signaling contribute to Met receptor-mediated cell-cycle progression, but phospholipase-Cgamma or JNK activity and Mos synthesis are not critical. Notably, we demonstrate that Raf1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling are required for cell-cycle progression initiated by the Met receptor, a protein frequently deregulated in human tumors.     

The spindle checkpoint

Prior to sister-chromatid separation, the spindle checkpoint inhibits cell-cycle progression in response to a signal generated by mitotic spindle damage or by chromosomes that have not attached to microtubules. Recent work has shown that the spindle checkpoint inhibits cell-cycle progression by direct binding of components of the spindle checkpoint pathway to components of a specialized ubiquitin-conjugating system that is responsible for triggering sister-chromatid separation.     

Cell cycle and differentiation

The development of multicellular organisms relies on the temporal and spatial control of cell proliferation and cell growth. The relationship between cell-cycle progression and development is complex and characterized by mutual dependencies. On the level of the individual cell, this interrelationship has implications for pattern formation and cell morphogenesis. On a supercellular level, this interrelationship affects meristem function and organ growth. Often, developmental signals not only direct cell-cycle progression but also set the frame for cell-cycle regulation by determining cell-type-specific cell-cycle modes. In other cases, however, cell-cycle progression appears to be required for the further differentiation of some cell types. There are also examples in which cell cycle and differentiation seem to be controlled at the same level and progress rather independently from each other or are linked by the same regulator or pathway. Furthermore, different relationships between cell cycle and differentiation can be combined in a succession of events during development, leading to complex developmental programs.     

Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1

Activation of stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) is essential for proper cell adaptation to extracellular stimuli. The exposure of yeast cells to high osmolarity, or mutations that lead to activation of the Hog1 SAPK, result in cell-cycle arrest. The mechanisms by which Hog1 and SAPKs in general regulate cell-cycle progression are not completely understood. Here we show that Hog1 regulates cell cycle progression at the G1 phase by a dual mechanism that involves downregulation of cyclin expression and direct targeting of the CDK-inhibitor protein Sic1. Hog1 interacts physically with Sic1 in vivo and in vitro, and phosphorylates a single residue at the carboxyl terminus of Sic1, which, in combination with the downregulation of cyclin expression, results in Sic1 stabilization and inhibition of cell-cycle progression. Cells lacking Sic1 or containing a Sic1 allele mutated in the Hog1 phosphorylation site are unable to arrest at G1 phase after Hog1 activation, and become sensitive to osmostress. Together, our data indicate that the Sic1 CDK-inhibitor is the molecular target for the SAPK Hog1 that is required to modulate cell-cycle progression in response to stress.     

Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle

The repair of DNA lesions that occur endogenously or in response to diverse genotoxic stresses is indispensable for genome integrity. DNA lesions activate checkpoint pathways that regulate specific DNA-repair mechanisms in the different phases of the cell cycle. Checkpoint-arrested cells resume cell-cycle progression once damage has been repaired, whereas cells with unrepairable DNA lesions undergo permanent cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. Recent studies have provided insights into the mechanisms that contribute to DNA repair in specific cell-cycle phases and have highlighted the mechanisms that ensure cell-cycle progression or arrest in normal and cancerous cells.     

Insulin delays the progression of Drosophila cells through G2/M by activating the dTOR/dRaptor complex

In Drosophila and mammals, insulin signalling can increase growth, progression through G1/S, cell size and tissue size. Here, we analyse the way insulin affects cell size and cell-cycle progression in two haemocyte-derived Drosophila cell lines. Surprisingly, we find that although insulin increases cell size, it slows the rate at which these cells increase in number. By using BrdU pulse-chase to label S-phase cells and follow their progression through the cell cycle, we show that insulin delays progression through G2/M, thereby slowing cell division. The ability of insulin to slow progression through G2/M is independent of its ability to stimulate progression through G1/S, so is not a consequence of feedback by the cell-cycle machinery to maintain cell-cycle length. Insulin's effects on progression through G2/M are mediated by dTOR/dRaptor signalling. Partially inhibiting dTOR/dRaptor signalling by dsRNAi or mild rapamycin treatment can increase cell number in cultured haemocytes and the Drosophila wing, respectively. Thus, insulin signalling can influence cell number depending on a balance between its ability to accelerate progression through G1/S and delay progression through G2/M.     

An encore for ribosome biogenesis in the control of cell proliferation

Although the importance of cell growth for cell-cycle progression has been recognized for thirty years, the molecular basis of this relationship is poorly understood. However, researchers have begun to tease apart these two processes in model systems. This commentary focuses on one potential mechanism by which ribosome biogenesis antagonizes cell-cycle progression until the cell has grown to an adequate size.     

Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation

Normal cell-cycle progression is a crucial task for every multicellular organism, as it determines body size and shape, tissue renewal and senescence, and is also crucial for reproduction. On the other hand, dysregulation of the cell-cycle progression leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation is the hallmark of cancer. Therefore, it is not surprising that it is a tightly regulated process, with multifaceted and very complex control mechanisms. It is now well established that one of those mechanisms relies on ion channels, and in many cases specifically on potassium channels. Here, we summarize the possible mechanisms underlying the importance of potassium channels in cell-cycle control and briefly review some of the identified channels that illustrate the multiple ways in which this group of proteins can influence cell proliferation and modulate cell-cycle progression.     

Cell-cycle progression during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum and its relation to the subsequent cell-sorting in the multicellular structures

Previous studies have shown that the cell-cycle phase at the onset of starvation is a naturally occurring variable that is closely involved in the subsequent sorting and differentiation of cells during Dictyostelium development. Here the cell-cycle progression during the development of D. discoideum Ax-2 cells and its relation to the subsequent cell-sorting were analyzed in detail using synchronized cells and their pulse-labeling by 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). Measurements of cell number and nuclearity provided evidence that about 80% of cells progressed their cell-cycle after formation of multicellular structures (mounds). Many cells (T7 cells) starved at mid–late G2-phase (just before the PS-point from which cells initiate development when starved) progressed to the cell-cycle after mound formation. In contrast, a less amount of cells (T1 cells) starved at late G2-phase (just after the PS-point) progressed through the cell-cycle after mound formation. The significance of cell-cycle progression presented here is discussed, with reference to cell differentiation and pattern formation.     

Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of CNT1, a concentrative nucleoside transporter involved in the uptake of cell-cycle-dependent nucleoside-derived anticancer drugs

Most nucleoside-derived anticancer drugs are taken up by the high-affinity Na-dependent nucleoside transporter CNT1. Since such drugs are to some extent cell-cycle-dependent in their cytotoxic action, we examined the relationship between CNT1 expression and cell-cycle progression in the rat hepatoma cell line FAO. Cell cultures were synchronized either at late G1 or early S stages by combining mimosin treatment with either previous synchronization or not by serum starvation. Cell-cycle progression was then assessed by measuring [methyl-3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA and monitoring cyclin E and A protein levels. In these conditions, CNT1 protein amounts increase at the G1-S transition. When cells were synchronized using hydroxyurea (HU), which directly interacts with nucleotide metabolism by inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase, CNT1 protein amounts increased in synchronized cells and remained high during cell-cycle progression. These data indicate that CNT1 adapts to cell-cycle progression and responds to nucleos(t)ide metabolism status, a feature that might contribute to the cytotoxic action of cell-cycle-dependent anticancer drugs.     

A comparison of time-lapse cinemicrography and flow cytometry for the study of accelerated cell-cycle transit

Abstract. Two methods for the study of cell-cycle progression, time-lapse cinemicrography (TLCM) and flow cytometry (FCM), were compared for their ability to measure the shortening of cell-cycle transit time induced by temporary inhibition of DNA synthesis. DNA synthesis was reversibly inhibited by aphidicolin (APH) in synchronized HeLa cells obtained by mitotic collection. TLCM directly measured intermitotic time intervals and thereby directly obtained the cell-cycle transit time distribution. In contrast, FCM measured time dependent changes in the fractions of cells in the cell-cycle phases from which the distribution of cells traversing a cell-cycle boundary, such as that between G₁ and S phase, was determined. Nevertheless, both methods provided equivalent measures of the cell-cycle transit time and its dispersion. However, TLCM apeared to provide a better measure of skewness of the transit time distribution than did FCM. Further, both methods were able to detect changes in the cell cycle transit on the order of 1 h or less. The TLCM data showed a greater precision (due to a larger number of data points) than that from FCM. However, FCM was able to directly measure changes in the transit of G₁ phase whereas TLCM would require two different experiments to make a similar determination. The results obtained in this study show that FCM can replace TLCM to study most aspects of cell-cycle progression.     

Synthesis and biological activity of fungal metabolite, 4-hydroxy-3-(3'-methyl-2'-butenyl)-benzoic acid

4-Hydroxy-3-(3'-methyl-2'-butenyl)-benzoic acid (HMBA) was previously isolated from Curvularia sp. KF119 as a cell-cycle inhibitor. However, the present study used a novel and practical synthetic method to prepare a large quantity of HMBA. The synthetic HMBA was found to inhibit the cell-cycle progression of HeLa cells with a comparable potency to the natural fungal metabolite. The inhibition of the cell-cycle progression by the synthetic HMBA involved both the activation of p21(WAFI) and the inhibition of cyclin Dl expression in the cells. Consequently, this new synthetic procedure provides an easy and convenient way to produce or manipulate the original fungal metabolite.     

The bacterial effector Cif interferes with SCF ubiquitin ligase function by inhibiting deneddylation of Cullin1

Cycle inhibiting factor (Cif) is one of the effectors delivered into epithelial cells by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) via the type III secretion system (TTSS). Cif family proteins, which inhibit host cell-cycle progression via mechanisms not yet precisely understood, are highly conserved among EPEC, EHEC, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Photorhabdus luminescens and Burkholderia pseudomallei.Levels of several proteins relevant to cell-cycle progression are modulated by Cullin-RING ligases (CRLs), which in turn are activated by conjugation and deconjugation of NEDD8 to Cullins. Here we show that Cif interacts with NEDD8 and interferes with SCF (Skp1-Cullin1-F-box protein) complex ubiquitin ligase function. We found that neddylated Cullin family proteins accumulated and ubiquitination of p27 decreased in cells infected with EPEC. Consequently, Cif stabilized SCF substrates such as CyclinD1, Cdt1, and p27, and caused G1 cell-cycle arrest. Using time-lapse-imaging of fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell-cycle indicator (Fucci)-expressing cells, we were able to monitor cell-cycle progression during EPEC infection and confirmed the arrest of infected cells at G1. Our in vitro and in vivo data show that Cif-NEDD8 interaction inhibits deneddylation of Cullins, suppresses CRL activity and induces G1 arrest. We thus conclude that the bacterial effector Cif interferes with neddylation-mediated cell-cycle control.     

Negative regulation of cell-cycle progression by RINGO/Speedy E

Cell-cycle transitions are controlled by CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases), whose activation is usually associated with the binding of cyclins. RINGO/Speedy proteins can also bind to and activate CDKs, although they do not have amino acid sequence homology with cyclins. The RINGO/Speedy family members studied so far positively regulate cell-cycle progression. In the present paper, we report the biochemical and functional characterization of RINGO/Speedy E. We show that RINGO/Speedy E is a functionally distant member of this protein family that negatively affects cell-cycle progression. RINGO/Speedy E overexpression inhibits the meiotic progression in Xenopus oocytes as well as the proliferation of mammalian cells. RINGO/Speedy E can bind to endogenous CDK1 and CDK2 in both cellular systems. However, the RINGO/Speedy E-activated CDKs have different substrate specificity than the CDKs activated by other RINGO/Speedy proteins, which may account for their different effects on the cell cycle. Our results indicate that, although all RINGO/Speedy family members can activate CDKs, they may differently regulate cell-cycle progression.     

Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras

Background Ras proteins play an essential role in the transduction of signals from a wide range of cell-surface receptors to the nucleus. These signals may promote cellular proliferation or differentiation, depending on the cell background. It is well established that Ras plays an important role in the transduction of mitogenic signals from activated growth-factor receptors, leading to cell-cycle entry. However, important questions remain as to whether Ras controls signalling events during cell-cycle progression and, if so, at which point in the cell-cycle it is activated.Results To address these questions we have developed a novel, functional assay for the detection of cellular activated Ras. Using this assay, we found that Ras was activated in HeLa cells, following release from mitosis, and in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, following serum-stimulated cell-cycle entry. In each case, peak Ras activation occurred in mid-G1 phase. Ras activation in HeLa cells at mid-G1 phase was dependent on RNA and protein synthesis and was not associated with tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc proteins and their binding to Grb2. Significantly, activation of Ras and the extracellular-signal regulated (ERK) subgroup of mitogen-activated protein kinases were not temporally correlated during G1-phase progression.Conclusions Activation of Ras during mid-G1 phase appears to differ in many respects from its rapid activation by growth factors, suggesting a novel mechanism of regulation that may be intrinsic to cell-cycle progression. Furthermore, the temporal dissociation between Ras and ERK activation suggests that Ras targets alternate effector pathways during G1-phase progression.