Modification of median nerve somatic evoked potentials by prior median nerve,peroneal nerve,and auditory stimulation

In a recovery function design, changes were measured in the somatic evoked potentials (SEP) to right median nerve (RMN) shocks preceded by stimulation of: the same nerve (RMN-RMN); the left median nerve having primary input to the homologous sensory area in the contralateral hemisphere (LMN-RMN); the right peroneal nerve having primary input to a different region of the same hemisphere (RPN-RMN); and the auditory nerve with primary input to a different sensory modality (AUD-RMN). Eight inter-stimulus intervals ranged from zero (simultaneous) to 2.5 sec. It was assumed that the degree of interaction between evoked potentials would be related to the degree to which common neural structures are activated or modulated in response to the stimuli. Results were: (a) the primary somatosensory response N20-P30 was little influenced by other somatic or auditory stimulation, interaction occurring predominantly in the RMN-RMN condition; (b) with increasing latency, components showed increasing interaction across modalities; (c) preceding homolateral stimulation (RPN-RMN) showed no greater interaction than preceding contralateral stimulation (LMN-RMN); (d) N55-P100 differed from the primary somatosensory response N20-P30 by showing greater interaction with other somatic stimuli; and (e) N140-P190 showed similarly shaped recovery functions across stimulus pairs but significant differences in magnitude of interaction. These results show that components with similar wave form and topographical characteristics can have different neurophysiological properties.     

Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome

Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median nerve stimulation were recorded in 42 patients with Down's syndrome and in 42 age- and sex-matched normal subjects. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the absolute peak latencies of N9, N11 and N13 components. However, interpeak latencies, N9-N11, N11-N13 and N9-N13, were prolonged significantly in Down's syndrome. These findings suggest impaired impulse conduction in the proximal part of the brachial plexus, posterior roots and/or posterior column-medial lemniscal pathway. Interpeak latency N13-N20, representing conduction time from cervical cord to sensory cortex, was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Cortical potentials N20 and P25 in the parietal area and P20 and N25 in the frontal area were of significantly larger amplitude in Down's syndrome. P25 had double peaks in 16 of 42 normal subjects, but these were not apparent in any of the patients.     

Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs     

Effect of sleep stage on somatosensory evoked potentials by median nerve stimulation

The effects of sleep stage on early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and short-latency components elicited by median nerve stimulation were studied in 12 normal volunteers. The latency of P13 in the awake stage was not significantly different from that in any sleep stage. The latencies of N16, N20 and P20 were significantly prolonged while the amplitude of N20 was decreased during the non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stage. P22, P23 and N24 components showed double peaks (P23a, P23b, N24a, N24b) during the NREM sleep stage in 6 subjects, while N24 showed a single peak and only P22 and P23 showed double peaks in 5 other subjects. The latencies and morphologies of SEPs during rapid eye movement sleep stage were almost the same as those during the awake stage. These findings suggest that NREM sleep affects the latency, amplitude and morphology of N16 and early cortical components.     

Frontal distribution of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

The topography of early frontal SEPs (P20 and N26) to left median nerve stimulation was studied in 30 normal subjects and 3 patients with the left frontal bone defect. The amplitudes of P20 and N26 were maximum at the frontal electrode (F4) contralateral to the stimulation and markedly decreased at frontal electrodes ipsilateral to the site of stimulation. There was, however, no latency difference of P20 and N26 between ipsilateral and contralateral frontal electrodes. These results suggest that the origin of the ipsilateral and contralateral P20 and N26 is the same. The wide distribution of P20 and N26 over both frontal areas could be explained by assuming a smearing effect from generators actually located in the rolandic fissure and motor cortex.     

Scalp topography and distribution of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

Topographies and distributions of cortical SEPs to median nerve stimulation were studied in 8 normal adults and 5 neurological patients. SEPs recorded from C4, P4, Pz, T6-A1A2 derivations to left median nerve stimulation were composed of 2 early negative (N16, N20) and 2 positive components (P12, P23), whereas those recorded from frontal electrodes (Fz, Fp1, Fp2) disclosed 2 early negativities (N16, N24) and 2 early positivities (P12, P20). N20 and P20, and P23 and N24, reversed across the rolandic fissure with no significant difference in their peak latencies. P23 was of slightly shorter latency at C4 than at more posterior electrodes (P4, T6, Pz).In 3 patients with complete hemiplegia but normal sensation, all the early SEP components were normal in scalp distribution and peak latencies except for a decrease of N24 amplitude. In 2 patients with complete hemiplegia and sensory loss no early cortical SEPs were seen. These findings suggest that N20 and P20 are generated as a single horizontal dipole in the central fissure, whereas P23 and N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and postrolandic regions.     

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were studied in 40 patients with Down's syndrome and in age- and gender-matched healthy controls as well as in middle-aged and aged healthy subjects. In median nerve SEPs, latencies of the initial cortical potentials, N18 and P18, showed no significant difference, but the following potentials N22, P25, N32, P41 and P46 were relatively or significantly shorter in latency in Down's patients than in the controls. Amplitudes of all components in Down's patients were significantly larger than those of age- and gender-matched controls as well as of those of middle-aged healthy subjects, but there was only a small difference in their amplitudes from aged healthy subjects. Results of posterior tibial nerve SEPs were generally consistent with those of median nerve SEPs. Therefore, ‘short latency with large amplitude’ is the main characteristic of middle-latency SEPs in Down's syndrome, possibly related to accelerated physiological aging of the central nervous system.     

Mentalis muscle responses to median nerve stimulation

Electrical stimulation may produce excitation or inhibition of the motor neurons, as represented the blink reflex and masseter silent period in response to trigeminal nerve stimulation. Clinically, a light touch on the palm may evoke a mentalis muscle response (MMR), i.e. a palmomental reflex. In this study, we attempted to characterize the MMR to median nerve stimulation. Electrical stimulation was applied at the median nerve with recordings at the mentalis muscles. An inhibition study was done with continuous stimuli during muscle contraction (I1 and I2 of MMRaverage). Excitation was done with a single shot during muscle relaxation (MMRsingle) or by continuous stimuli during muscle contraction (E1 and E2 of MMRaverage). The characteristic differences between MMRaverage and MMRsingle were as follows: earlier onset latencies of MMRaverage (MMRaverage < 45 ms; MMRsingle > 60 ms), and a lower amplitude of MMRaverage (MMRaverage < 50 microV; MMRsingle > 150 microV). The receptive field of MMRsingle was widespread over the body surface and that of MMRaverage was limited to the trigeminal, median and index digital nerves. Series of stimuli usually significantly decreased the amplitude of MMRsingle, as a phenomenon of habituation. On the other hand, it was difficult to evoke the earlier response (i.e. MMRaverage) without continuous stimuli and an average technique. MMRaverage had the components of both excitation (E) and inhibition (I); for example, E1-I1-E2-I2 or I1-E2-I2. E2 was the most consistent component. In patients with dorsal column dysfunction, median nerve stimulation could successfully elicit MMRsingle, but not MMRaverage. Contrarily, in patients with pain sensory loss, it was more difficult to reproduce MMRsingle than MMRaverage. It seemed that MMRaverage and MMRsingle did not have equivalents across the different modalities of stimulation.     

SEPs to median nerve stimulation: normative data for paediatrics

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide neurologists with an assessment of the neuraxis from peripheral nerve to sensory cortex. Their value is particularly relevant in paediatric neurology as sensory clinical examination can be difficult in young infants and children. The clinical utility of SEPs, however, requires knowledge of the alterations in wave form which occur with growth and development. This study presents normative SEP data from 4 months-35 years. Different non-linear maturational patterns were seen in spinal and central segments of the nervous system. The cervical components (N12, N13) changed little in latency until 2–3 years, the N20 decreased in latency until 2–3 years and P22 decreased in latency until 6–8 years, after which latencies increased until adulthood. The greatest latency changes occurred in N12 and N13, the least in N20. Wave from morphology and interpeak latencies also changed with age. Adult morphology was achieved early (from 1 year), but central conduction time (N13–N20) reached adult values only at 6–8 years. This study provides normative values of SEPs during maturation and a functional assessment of pathways known to myelinate and mature at varying rates.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the posterior pharynx to stimulation of the median nerve and cauda equina

Somatosensory evoked potentials (ppSEPs) in response to stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist and the cauda equina at the epidural space (the L4 level) were recorded from the posterior wall of the pharynx in 15 patients who underwent spinal surgery under general anesthesia, using disc electrodes attached to the endotracheal tube, and compared with segmental spinal cord potentials (seg-SCPs) that were recorded simultaneously from the posterior epidural space (PES). ppSEPs consisted of the initially positive spike (P9) followed by slow positive (P13) and negative (N22) waves. The P13 and N22 of ppSEPs had phase reversal relationship with the P2 and N2 recorded from the PES, respectively. The peak latencies of P9 (9.40 ± 0.7 ms) (mean ± SD), P13 (13.1 ± 0.9 ms), and N22 (22.0 ± 2.1 ms) of ppSEPs coincided with those of P1, N1 and P2 of seg-SCPs, respectively. ppSEPs were recorded more clearly with a reference electrode on the dorsal surface of the neck than with the reference electrode at the earlobe or back of the hand. The threshold and maximal stimulus intensities were also similar between the ppSEPs and seg-SCPs. Thus, the P9, P13, and N22 components of ppSEPs were thought to have the same origin as the P1, N1 and P2 of seg-SCPs, respectively. Therefore, the P9, P13 and N22 of ppSEPs may reflect incoming volleys through the root, synchronized activities of the interneurons and primary afferent depolarizations (PAD), respectively. ppSEPs in response to cauda equina stimulation showed that the latencies of the two initial components (4.6 ± 0.4 and 6.4 ± 0.6 ms) corresponded to those of the SCPs recorded from the PES (4.6 ± 0.3 and 6.3 ± 0.5 ms), suggesting that these potentials reflect impulses conducting through the spinal cord, similar to epidurally recorded SCPs.     

Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation

We have recorded early components of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields with a sensitive 7-channel first-order gradiometer using a wide recording passband (0.05–2000 Hz) and high sampling frequency (8000 Hz). The left median nerve was stimulated at the wrist and responses were recorded over the right hemisphere. The responses typically consisted of a N20m peaking at 18–20 msec, a small P22m peaking at 21–23 msec and a P27m peaking at 29–31 msec. The topography of N20m could be explained by a tangential current dipole in the posterior wall of the central sulcus (probably in area 3b). The equivalent dipoles of P27m were located on average 10 mm antero-medially to the sources of N20m. This suggests that P27m may get a contribution from the anterior wall of the central sulcus. An increase of stimulus repetition rate from 2 to 5 Hz decreased the amplitude of P27m more than that of N20m, which implies that these two deflactions are generated by different neural netwoks.     

Long sensory tracts (cuneate fascicle) in cervical somatosensory evoked potential after median nerve stimulation

Low amplitude high frequency waves (LHW) were investigated in normal and patient cervical somatosensory evoked potentials after median nerve stimulation (CSEP) in parallel to normal and patient conducted somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) after tibial nerve stimulation. Normal recordings were obtained in five subjects undergoing dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) coagulation for pain relief. Patient recordings were obtained in 11 subjects suffering from either syringomyelia, spinal cord tumour, or both. All recordings were made intraoperatively from the dorsal spinal cord surface using the subpial recording technique. Normal CSEP showed typical triphasic potential starting with an initial P9, followed by N13 and a final positivity, P1. Numerous LHW were superimposed on slow triphasic potential. To improve the visibility of LHW, slow triphasic potential was removed from the original CSEP. Potentials thus obtained contained only high frequency components of CSEP, i.e. LHW. They were compared with conducted SEP after tibial nerve stimulation. Comparison revealed similarities in high frequency, low amplitude and general wave form, LHW thus showing characteristics of conducted potential. Duration was found to be significantly shorter than normal duration in both patient LHW (Student's t-test, P<0.0005) and patient conducted SEP (Student's t-test, P=0.064). A shorter duration was associated with worsening of configuration in patient LHW and patient conducted SEP. These changes of LHW could not be connected with distortion of N13 seen in patient CSEP. A shorter duration and worsening of configuration in patient LHW were most prominent in cases with a loss of vibration and posture senses, but were also observed in cases where only pain and temperature senses were affected. We therefore concluded that cuneate fascicle is the most likely generator of LHW, although the participation of other cervical long sensory tracts, e.g. spinothalamic tract, cannot be ruled out.     

Cerebral evoked potentials after rectal stimulation

We obtained reproducible cortical evoked potentials (EPs) in response to electrical stimulation of the rectum with 1 Hz frequency. We found 2 distinctly different EPs in response to rectal stimulation. In 5 females, the EP had an early onset latency (mean 26 msec) with multiple positive and negative peaks. In 10 females, the EP had a later onset latency (mean 52 msec) and a trifid configuration, having a very prominent negative peak. The early onset EPs after rectal stimulation appeared very similar to the wave form of the cortical EPs recorded after pudendal nerve stimulation. Finding similar interpeak latencies in the early onset EP after rectal stimulation and the EP after pudendal nerve stimulation suggests that either the same pathway was used or that rectal stimulation also stimulated the pudendal nerve. It appears that we stimulated visceral afferents when we recorded late onset EPs, because the large EP amplitude declined rapidly with faster stimulation rates and also with greater number of averaging, and the sensation threshold was very unstable, all different to somatosensory EPs.     

Hypothalamic evoked potentials to vagus and sciatic nerve stimulation

Hypothalamic evoked potentials to stimulation of the cervical portion of the vagus nerve and the sciatic nerve were recorded in experiments on cats anesthetized with chloralose and immobilized with succinylcholine. When both monopolar and bipolar recording techniques were used the focus of maximal activity of both "visceral" and "somatic" evoked potentials was located in the supramammillary and posterolateral region of the hypothalamus. Responses in the tuberal and anterior hypothalamus occurred in most experiments after a longer latent period, their amplitude was lower, and they were less stable. Evoked potentials in the focus of maximal activity of the posterior hypothalamus are similar in all parameters to responses of the mesencephalic reticular formation. Evoked potentials to stimulation of the visceral nerve have a higher threshold of generation and a lower amplitude than the "somatic" responses and they are inhibited more strongly when the frequency of stimulation is increased. Evoked potentials arising in the hypothalamus in response to stimulation of the vagus and sciatic nerves are regarded as nonspecific responses of reticular type.L. A. Orbeli Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, Erevan. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 253–260, May–June, 1973.     

Scalp,basal epidural and intravascular far-field recordings after median nerve stimulation: evidence for a separate N18a potential

Far-field somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) after median nerve stimulation were recorded from scalp- (Fz), epidural(ED) and intravascular electrodes (basilar artery [Bas]) to study the nature of the controversial N18a component of the widespread N18 potential. In healthy volunteers frequently an N18a potential was recorded at Fz. Simultaneous Fz and ED recordings at the pontomesencephalic junction as well as Bas-recordings at the caudal basilar artery showed N18a components identical in latency and shape. With intravascular recordings the shapes differed between the top of the basilar artery and the caudal artery recordings. These findings support the existence of a separate N18a potential. The generator of the N18a is likely to be localized within the upper brainstem.     

Scalp, basal epidural and intravascular far-field recordings after median nerve stimulation: evidence for a separate N18a potential

Far-field somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) after median nerve stimulation were recorded from scalp- (Fz), epidural- (ED) and intravascular electrodes (basilar artery [Bas]) to study the nature of the controversial N18a component of the widespread N18 potential. In healthy volunteers frequently an N18a potential was recorded at Fz. Simultaneous Fz and ED recordings at the pontomesencephalic junction as well as Bas-recordings at the caudal basilar artery showed N18a components identical in latency and shape. With intravascular recordings the shapes differed between the top of the basilar artery and the caudal artery recordings. These findings support the existence of a separate N18a potential. The generator of the N18a is likely to be localized within the upper brainstem.