Opioids in neuropathic pain

Pain inhibition can be induced by immune-derived opioids interacting with opioid receptors on peripheral sensory nerves. These receptors are up-regulated in inflammation (1). Opioid peptides are synthesised in circulating immune cells which migrate to injured tissue. This is orchestrated by selectins and other adhesion molecules located on immunocytes and on vascular endothelium (2). In response to releasing stimuli the opioids are secreted, activate peripheral opioid receptors and produce analgesia by inhibiting the excitability of sensory nerves and/or the release of excitatory neuropeptides. These effects occur in the periphery and are devoid of central side-effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, dysphoria or dependence. Targeting of immune cells containing opioids to injured tissues is a novel concept of pain control and opens potential new therapeutic approaches.     

Effects of opioids on the immune system

Both therapeutic and chronic uses of opioids compromise the optimal functioning of the immune system. Overwhelming evidence suggests that opioid use affects both innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Chronic administration of opioids decreases the proliferative capacity of macrophage progenitor cells and lymphocytes. Additionally, the differentiated function of immune cells is significantly affected by opioids. These effects are mediated by either a direct action of opioids on the target cells or by indirect centrally mediated pathways. Molecular biological and biochemical characterization suggest that immune cells differentially express classical opioid receptors. Interestingly, these studies also reveal the presence of a novel class of opioid receptors in immune cells. We believe that this low affinity morphine binding site mediates the antiproliferative effects of morphine. Special issue dedicated to Dr. Eric J. Simon.     

Opioids trigger alpha 5 beta 1 integrin-mediated monocyte adhesion

Inflammatory reactions involve a network of chemical and molecular signals that initiate and maintain host response. In inflamed tissue, immune system cells generate opioid peptides that contribute to potent analgesia by acting on specific peripheral sensory neurons. In this study, we show that opioids also modulate immune cell function in vitro and in vivo. By binding to its specific receptor, the opioid receptor-specific ligand DPDPE triggers monocyte adhesion. Integrins have a key role in this process, as adhesion is abrogated in cells treated with specific neutralizing anti-alpha5beta1 integrin mAb. We found that DPDPE-triggered monocyte adhesion requires PI3Kgamma activation and involves Src kinases, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav-1, and the small GTPase Rac1. DPDPE also induces adhesion of pertussis toxin-treated cells, indicating involvement of G proteins other than Gi. These data show that opioids have important implications in regulating leukocyte trafficking, adding a new function to their known effects as immune response modulators.     

From inhibition to excitation: functional effects of interaction between opioid receptors

Opioids have excitatory effects in multiple regions of the nervous system. Excitation by opioids is generally attributed to inhibition of inhibitory pathways (disinhibition). However, recent studies indicate that opioids can directly excite individual cells. These effects may occur when opioid receptors interact with other G protein coupled receptors, when different subtypes of opioid receptors interact, or when opioids transactivate other receptors such as receptor tyrosine kinases. Changes in the relative level of expression of different receptors in an individual cell may therefore determine its functional response to a given ligand. This phenomenon could represent an adaptive mechanism involved in tolerance, dependence and subsequent withdrawal.     

The role of endogenous opioids and their receptors in the immune system.

Opioid peptides appear to be dynamic signaling molecules that are produced within the immune system and are active regulators of an immune response. Furthermore, the receptors for these peptides occurring on immunocyte membranes share characteristics with neuronal opioid receptors, including molecular size, immunogenicity, and the use of specific intracellular signaling pathways. Recent studies of the interaction of opioids with cytokines have indicated that opioid peptides are intimately involved within the immune system. Specifically, opioids, including 2-n-pentyloxy-2-phenyl-4-methyl-morpholine, naloxone, and beta-endorphin, have been shown to interact with IL-2 receptors (134) and regulate production of IL-1 and IL-2 (48-50, 135). Conversely, IL-1 has been shown to up-regulate opioid peptide binding in brain tissue (136). Furthermore, the induction of IL-1 by opioids has also been identified in the invertebrate Mytilus, indicating the evolutionary conservation of this relationship (137). These results seem to typify the intricate association between the immune and neuroendocrine systems through opioid pathways. It is predicted that future endeavors will use this relationship to diagnose and treat specific diseases that have at their basis neuroendocrine and immunologic imbalances.     

背根神经节神经元阿片受体和离子通道的研究进展

阿片及阿片受体与外周神经系统镇痛机制的研究,随着分子生物学技术的发展,已在受体的分子结构、形态学、分子药理学、离子通道和细胞内信号转导系统等方面取得了显著进展。μ、δ、κ阿片受体分子结构上的部分差异决定了它们各自的功能特征。三种受体在初级感觉神经元分布的比例不同,但都能介导细胞Ｃａ＾２＋通道的抑制和Ｋ＾＋电流增加及减少。阿片受体和通道之间由多种第二信使系统偶联。分子药理学研究表明它们还存在亚型受体     

Special feature for the Olympics: effects of exercise on the immune system: neuropeptides and their interaction with exercise and immune function

It is known today that the immune system is influenced by various types of psychological and physiological stressors, including physical activity. It is well known that physical activity can influence neuropeptide levels both in the central nervous system as well as in peripheral blood. The reported changes of immune function in response to exercise have been suggested to be partly regulated by the activation of different neuropeptides and the identification of receptors for neuropeptides and steroid hormones on cells of the immune system has created a new dimension in this endocrine-immune interaction. It has also been shown that immune cells are capable of producing neuropeptides, creating a bidirectional link between the nervous and immune systems. The most common neuropeptides mentioned in this context are the endogenous opioids. The activation of endogenous opioid peptides in response to physical exercise is well known in the literature, as well as the immunomodulation mediated by opioid peptides. The role of endogenous opioids in the exercise-induced modulation of immune function is less clear. The present paper will also discuss the role of other neuroendocrine factors, such as substance P, neuropeptide Y and vasoactive intestinal peptide, and pituitary hormones, including growth hormone, prolactin and adrenocorticotrophin, in exercise and their possible effects on immune function.     

Role of opioids in peripheral analgesia.

Several pharmacological, neurophysiological and immunohistological studies indicate that exogenous or endogenous opioids can have antinociceptive effects by acting at peripheral sites. Although modulation of mu, delta and kappa receptors can mediate these effects, the nature of the noxious stimulus and the underlying pathological condition may affect the types of opioid receptors involved. Thus, it would be appropriate to develop peripherally-acting opioid analgesics that do not have the untoward central side effects often associated with conventional analgesic drugs. This paper reviews the evidence supportive of a peripheral mechanism of action for opioids.     

Attacking pain at its source: new perspectives on opioids

The treatment of severe pain with opioids has thus far been limited by their unwanted central side effects. Recent research promises new approaches, including opioid analgesics acting outside the central nervous system, targeting of opioid peptide-containing immune cells to peripheral damaged tissue, and gene transfer to enhance opioid production at sites of injury.     

Morphine regulates gene expression of alpha- and beta-chemokines and their receptors on astroglial cells via the opioid mu receptor

The brain is a target organ for recreational drugs and HIV-1. Epidemiological data demonstrate that opioid abuse is a risk factor for HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS. Chemokines and their receptors have been implicated in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1 infections. However, little is known about the effects of opioids on the expression of chemokines and their receptors (the latter also are HIV-1 coreceptors) by cells of the CNS. Herein we describe the effects of morphine on gene expression of the alpha- and beta-chemokines and their receptors by the astrocytoma cell line U87 and by primary normal human astrocyte (NHA) cultures. U87 cells treated with morphine showed significant down-regulation of IL-8 gene expression, whereas expression of the IL-8 receptor CXCR2 was reciprocally up-regulated as detected by RT-PCR. Treatment of NHAs with morphine suppressed IL-8 and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1beta gene expression, whereas expression of their receptor genes, CCR3 and CCR5, was simultaneously enhanced. These morphine-induced effects on U87 and NHA cells were reversed by the opioid mu receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine. Morphine also enhanced the constitutive expression of the opioid mu receptor on astroglial cells. Our results support the hypothesis that opioids play a significant role in the susceptibility of the CNS to HIV-1 infection and subsequent encephalopathy by inhibiting local production of HIV-1-protective chemokines (IL-8 and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1beta) and enhancing expression of HIV-1 entry coreceptor genes (CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR2) within the CNS. These effects of opioids appear to be mediated through the opioid mu receptor that we demonstrated on astroglial cells.     

Crosstalk between the peripheral nervous system and breast cancer influences tumor progression

Recent studies have shown that peripheral nerves play an important role in the progression of breast cancer. Breast cancer cells (BCCs) promote local peripheral nerve growth and branching by secreting neuroactive molecules, including neurotrophins and axon guidance molecules (AGMs). Sympathetic nerves promote breast cancer progression, while parasympathetic and sensory nerves mainly have anti-tumor effects in the progression of breast cancer. Specifically, peripheral nerves can influence the progression of breast cancer by secreting neurotransmitters not only directly binding to the corresponding receptors of BCCs, but also indirectly acting on immune cells to modulate anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we summarize the crosstalk between breast cancer and peripheral nerves and the roles of important neuroactive molecules in the progression of breast cancer. In addition, we summarize indicators, including nerve fiber density and perineural invasion (PNI), that may help determine the prognosis of breast cancer based on current research results, as well as potential therapeutic approaches, such as β-blockers and retroviral-mediated genetic neuroengineering techniques, that may enhance the prognosis of breast cancer. In addition, we propose suggestions for future research priorities based on a current lack of knowledge in this area.     

Localization of mu-opioid receptor 1A on sensory nerve fibers in human skin

Opioid peptides are endogenous neuromodulators that play a major role in the nociceptive pathway by interacting with opioid receptors. So far, four opioid receptors (micro-, delta-, kappa-, orphan-receptor) have been cloned with a wide distribution in the central and peripheral nervous system. In the present study, we give first evidence for the presence of the micro-opioid receptor (MOR) isoform 1A in nerve fibers of human skin. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed MOR immunoreactivity to be present in dermal and epidermal nerve fibers. Double-immunofluorescence staining revealed that MOR is present on calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP)-positive sensory nerve fibers, while autonomic nerves of blood vessels, hair follicles, or skin glands were negative. In diseased skin such as psoriasis vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, and prurigo nodularis, distribution of MOR 1A immunoreactivity was similar to that of normal skin. These findings expand our knowledge about a direct regulatory role of cutaneous opioid receptors in the skin. Thus, peripheral cutaneous opioid receptors may be involved in the transmission of pain and pruritus, respectively. This is supported by previous observation that opioid receptor antagonists may significantly diminish experimentally evoked histamine-induced itch of the skin. Together, our findings contribute to the understanding of the high antipruritic potency of opioid receptor antagonists in various skin and systemic diseases.     

Opioid and nociceptin receptors regulate cytokine and cytokine receptor expression

Opioids were originally discovered because of their ability to induce analgesia, but further investigation has shown that the opioids regulate the function of cells involved in the immune response. We suggest that the regulation of cytokine, chemokine, and cytokine receptor expression is a critical component of the immunomodulatory activity of the opioids. In this paper we review the literature dealing with the regulation of cytokine and cytokine receptor expression by agonists for the three major opioid receptor types (mu, kappa, and delta), and nociceptin, the natural agonist for the orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptor. Although the opioid receptors share a high degree of sequence homology, opposing roles between the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) and the mu opioid receptor (MOR) have become apparent. We suggest that activation of the KOR induces an anti-inflammatory response through the down-regulation of cytokine, chemokine and chemokine receptor expression, while activation of the MOR favors a pro-inflammatory response. Investigation into the opioid receptor-like (ORL1)/nociceptin system also suggests a role for this receptor as a down-regulator of immune function. These effects suggest a broad role for opioids in the modulation of the function of the immune system, and suggest possible targets for the development of new therapeutics for inflammatory and infectious diseases.     

μ-Opioid Receptor Antibody Reveals Tissue-Dependent Specific Staining and Increased Neuronal μ-Receptor Immunoreactivity at the Injured Nerve Trunk in Mice

Neuropathic pain is a debilitating chronic disease often resulting from damage to peripheral nerves. Activation of opioid receptors on peripheral sensory neurons can attenuate pain without central nervous system side effects. Here we aimed to analyze the distribution of neuronal μ-opioid receptors, the most relevant opioid receptors in the control of clinical pain, along the peripheral neuronal pathways in neuropathy. Hence, following a chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve in mice, we used immunohistochemistry to quantify the μ-receptor protein expression in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), directly at the injured nerve trunk, and at its peripheral endings in the hind paw skin. We also thoroughly examined the μ-receptor antibody staining specificity. We found that the antibody specifically labeled μ-receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells as well as in neuronal processes of the sciatic nerve and hind paw skin dermis, but surprisingly not in the DRG, as judged by the use of μ/δ/κ-opioid receptor knockout mice. Therefore, a reliable quantitative analysis of μ-receptor expression in the DRG was not possible. However, we demonstrate that the μ-receptor immunoreactivity was strongly enhanced proximally to the injury at the nerve trunk, but was unaltered in paws, on days 2 and 14 following injury. Thus, μ-opioid receptors at the site of axonal damage might be a promising target for the control of painful neuropathies. Furthermore, our findings suggest a rigorous tissue-dependent characterization of antibodies'' specificity, preferably using knockout animals.     

In vivo effects of chronic treatment with [MET5]-enkephalin on hematological values and natural killer cell activity in athymic mice

The role of endogenous opioids in immunological mechanisms was examined by subjecting athymic (nu/nu) mice to chronic injections of the opioid agonist [Met5]-enkephalin (MET) or continuous opioid receptor blockade with naltrexone (NTX). After 8 days of treatment, neither excess peptide nor deprivation of opioids from receptors had any effect on body weight, spleen index (spleen to body weight ratio), total and differential white blood cell counts, and natural killer (NK) cell activity in peripheral blood or splenic lymphocytes. At 28 days, chronic treatment with MET or NTX had no effect on any of these parameters with the exception of an elevation from controls in NK cell activity in peripheral blood in mice receiving NTX, and subnormal NK cell activity related to splenic lymphocytes in the MET group. These results suggest that chronic exposure to an opioid agonist, or persistent opioid receptor blockade, have little influence on a variety of immunological properties in athymic mice, suggesting that native opioids such as MET do not play a marked role in defense mechanisms in the athymic mouse.     

Evidence for a delta-class opioid receptor on cells of the immune system

Opioid receptors have been reported to be present on cells of the immune system. Both opioid receptor-ligand interactions which are reversible by naloxone (classical) and those interactions which are irreversible by naloxone (nonclassical) appear to alter various immunologic parameters through the ligand-receptor interactions. In an effort to characterize opioid receptors (which operate with classical interactions) on cells of the immune system, we employed the delta-class opioid receptor-specific ligand, cis-(+)-3-methylfentanylisothiocyanate (SUPERFIT). We herein report the specific labeling of a protein with a molecular weight of 70,000 Da under reducing conditions (58,000 Da under nonreducing conditions) from both B and T cell-enriched murine splenocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Similar results are demonstrated by human peripheral blood lymphocytes and plastic-adherent (monocyte-enriched) leukocytes.     

The importance of the neuro‐immuno‐cutaneous system on human skin equivalent design

The skin is a highly complex organ, responsible for sensation, protection against the environment (pollutants, foreign proteins, infection) and thereby linked to the immune and sensory systems in the neuro‐immuno‐cutaneous (NIC) system. Cutaneous innervation is a key part of the peripheral nervous system; therefore, the skin should be considered a sensory organ and an important part of the central nervous system, an ‘active interface’ and the first connection of the body to the outside world. Peripheral nerves are a complex class of neurons within these systems, subsets of functions are conducted, including mechanoreception, nociception and thermoception. Epidermal and dermal cells produce signalling factors (such as cytokines or growth factors), neurites influence skin cells (such as via neuropeptides), and peripheral nerves have a role in both early and late stages of the inflammatory response. One way this is achieved, specifically in the cutaneous system, is through neuropeptide release and signalling, especially via substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and nerve growth factor (NGF). Cutaneous, neuronal and immune cells play a central role in many conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, UV‐induced immunosuppression, herpes and lymphomas. Therefore, it is critical to understand the connections and interplay between the peripheral nervous system and the skin and immune systems, the NIC system. Relevant in vitro tissue models based on human skin equivalents can be used to gain insight and to address impact across research and clinical needs.     

Differential T cell response in central and peripheral nerve injury: connection with immune privilege.

The central nervous system (CNS), unlike the peripheral nervous system (PNS), is an immune-privileged site in which local immune responses are restricted. Whereas immune privilege in the intact CNS has been studied intensively, little is known about its effects after trauma. In this study, we examined the influence of CNS immune privilege on T cell response to central nerve injury. Immunocytochemistry revealed a significantly greater accumulation of endogenous T cells in the injured rat sciatic nerve than in the injured rat optic nerve (representing PNS and CNS white matter trauma, respectively). Use of the in situ terminal deoxytransferase-catalyzed DNA nick end labeling (TUNEL) procedure revealed extensive death of accumulating T cells in injured CNS nerves as well as in CNS nerves of rats with acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but not in injured PNS nerves. Although Fas ligand (FasL) protein was expressed in white matter tissue of both systems, it was more pronounced in the CNS. Expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigens was found to be constitutive in the PNS, but in the CNS was induced only after injury. Our findings suggest that the T cell response to central nerve injury is restricted by the reduced expression of MHC class II antigens, the pronounced FasL expression, and the elimination of infiltrating lymphocytes through cell death.     

Non-opioid actions of opioid peptides

Beside the well known actions of opioid peptides on mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors, increasing amount of pharmacological and biochemical evidence has recently been published about non-opioid actions of various opioid peptides. These effects are not abolished by naloxone treatments. Such non-opioid effects are observed both in nervous tissues and in the cellular elements of the immune system. Peptides exhibiting non-opioid effects include beta-endorphin, dynorphin A, nociceptin/OFQ, endomorphins, hemorphins and a number of Proenkephalin A derived peptides, such as Met-enkephalin, Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe (MERF) and bovine adrenal medullary peptide (BAM22). Non-opioid actions are exerted through different neuronal receptors, e.g., dynorphin hyperalgesia through NMDA receptor, Met-enkephalin induced regulation of cell growth through zeta receptors, pain modulation by nociceptin through ORL-1 or NOP receptors, while BAM22 acts through sensory neuron specific G protein-coupled receptors (SNSR). We have investigated Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe (MERF) and its analogues by the means of direct and indirect radioligand binding assays. It has been found that in addition to kappa(2) and delta-opioid receptors, MERF can act also through sigma(2)- or probably via FMRF-NH(2) receptors in rat cerebellum. A role of functionally assembling heterodimer receptors in mediating the non-conventional actions of these peptide ligands can not be excluded as well.