Characterization of Dinophysis spp. (Dinophyceae,Dinophysiales) from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States1

Due to the increasing prevalence of Dinophysis spp. and their toxins on every US coast in recent years, the need to identify and monitor for problematic Dinophysis populations has become apparent. Here, we present morphological analyses, using light and scanning electron microscopy, and rDNA sequence analysis, using a ~2-kb sequence of ribosomal ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and LSU DNA, of Dinophysis collected in mid-Atlantic estuarine and coastal waters from Virginia to New Jersey to better characterize local populations. In addition, we analyzed for diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins in water and shellfish samples collected during blooms using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and an in vitro protein phosphatase inhibition assay and compared this data to a toxin profile generated from a mid-Atlantic Dinophysis culture. Three distinct morphospecies were documented in mid-Atlantic surface waters: D. acuminata, D. norvegica, and a “small Dinophysis sp.” that was morphologically distinct based on multivariate analysis of morphometric data but was genetically consistent with D. acuminata. While mid-Atlantic D. acuminata could not be distinguished from the other species in the D. acuminata-complex (D. ovum from the Gulf of Mexico and D. sacculus from the western Mediterranean Sea) using the molecular markers chosen, it could be distinguished based on morphometrics. Okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin 1, and pectenotoxin 2 were found in filtered water and shellfish samples during Dinophysis blooms in the mid-Atlantic region, as well as in a locally isolated D. acuminata culture. However, DSP toxins exceeded regulatory guidance concentrations only a few times during the study period and only in noncommercial shellfish samples.     

Are the mitochondrial cox1 and cob genes suitable markers for species of Dinophysis Ehrenberg?

The identification of Dinophysis species with similar morphology but different toxic (Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning, DSP) potential is a crucial task in harmful algae monitoring programmes. The taxonomic assignment of Dinophysis species using molecular markers is a difficult task due to extremely low interspecific variability within their nuclear ribosomal genes and intergenic regions. Mitochondrial cox1 gene has been proposed as a better specific marker for Dinophysis species based on its higher resolution for two morphologically related species (Dinophysis acuminata and Dinophysis ovum) of the “Dinophysis acuminata complex”. In this study, the potential of two mitochondrial genes (mt cox1 and cob) to discriminate among six Dinophysis species (field isolates and cultures) associated with DSP events was explored. Neither mt cox1 nor cob genes provided enough resolution for all species of Dinophysis. The cob gene showed very poor resolution and grouped all Dinophysis spp. in a common clade. In contrast, the cox1 phylogeny distinguished 5 clades in the Dinophysiales – the “acuminata complex”, the “caudata group”, “acuta + norvegica” and Phalacromaspp. However, within the “D. acuminata complex” mtcox1 is so far the unique marker that differentiates D. acuminata from other species: isolates of D. ovum and Dinophysis sacculus had almost identical sequences (only four mismatches), but they were well separated from D. acuminata. D. acuminata and Dinophysis skagii (considered a life cycle stage of the former) showed identical cox1 sequences. Probes towards this gene can be useful in Mediterranean and Western Iberia sites where the co-occurrence of close morphotypes of D. acuminata and D. sacculus pose a problem for monitoring analyses. This is the first report on cultures of D. sacculus and its phylogenetic relation with other species of the D. acuminata complex.     

Large subunit ribosomal RNA gene variation and sequence heterogeneity of Dinophysis (Dinophyceae) species from Scottish coastal waters

The purpose of the study was to investigate the genetic diversity of Dinophysis species from around the Scottish coast, with a view to an improved understanding of the dynamics and identification of this genus in Scottish waters. Single-cell PCR amplification with direct sequencing was performed on a total of 441 Dinophysis cells isolated from both live and Lugol's fixed plankton net samples. Universal eukaryotic primers were used to amplify the large subunit (LSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene of the Dinophysis isolates, with a frequency of PCR success of 26% for non-fixed and 48% for fixed samples. From this a total of 30 isolates were selected for this study and the D1–D2 region of the LSU-rRNA gene sequenced for phylogenetic analysis. No significant correlation could be made between geographical location and LSU sequence, although some regional sequence heterogeneity was observed within the Dinophysis acuta species. LSU sequence data was used to design Dinophysis genus specific and Dinophysis clade-specific primers primarily to ensure clean sequences from universal D1–D2 amplicons without a requirement for cloning. Three clade-specific primers designed to a region within the D2 hypervariable region of the LSU-rRNA gene allowed discrimination of Dinophysis acuminata/norvegica from Dinophysis tripos/caudata and Dinophysis fortii/acuta. In two isolates, SC359 (D. tripos) and LC58 (D. acuta), nested PCR products were observed with both the expected clade-specific primer, and Dasd-R2, the D. acuminata/norvegica clade-specific primer. Cloning and sequence analysis suggested that these amplicons were genuine “D. acuminata-like” sequences and their presence, albeit at a low frequency within different Dinophysis species, indicated that individual Dinophysis cells possess heterologous copies of the LSU-rRNA gene that are similar to LSU sequences normally associated with D. acuminata. The nature of the process that generated these hybrid cells, the frequency of such events and their importance is as yet unknown, but may provide a cautionary note for the development of PCR-based species specific detection methods.     

Diversity and plastid types in Dinophysis acuminata complex (Dinophyceae) in Scottish waters

Dinophysis acuminata produces lipophilic shellfish toxins (LSTs) that have economic and ecological impact on marine invertebrates in NE Atlantic where aquaculture farming is prevalent. Identification of D. acuminata can be complex. Cells exhibit a variety of morphotypes that overlap between species making identification using routine light microscopy difficult. These cells are mixotrophic and their population size is influenced by hydrographic conditions and prey populations. Dinophysis cells are able to acquire and temporarily keep prey plastids from a variety of photosynthetic unicellular sources. The Dinophysis community in Scottish waters tend to be dominated by cells with morphologies that appear to be variants of D. acuminata/norvegica complex particularly during late spring/early summer. To determine the identity of these morphotypes, DNA barcoding was performed on 32 single cell isolates from sites around the Scottish coast using the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and a partial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) fragment on the same single cells. Although the cells exhibited a variety of morphotypes, most were restricted to one cluster containing D. acuminata and three grouped with Dinophysis ovum. This is the first molecular confirmation of the presence of D. ovum in Scottish waters. Two isolates showed considerable divergence – one was unidentifiable from the public databases, whilst the other matched a Dinophysis cf. acuta isolate from Canada. To investigate prey plastids, molecular analysis of these Dinophysis single cells was conducted with a partial fragment of the plastid ribosomal marker (16S). Most cells harboured plastids from the cryptophyte Teleaulax – the most commonly reported plastid type, however one cell harboured a Rhodomonas/Storeatula derived plastid. This finding increases the range and variety of cryptophyte plastids found in Dinophysis and increases the range of prey-types.     

Revisiting the taxonomy of the “Dinophysis acuminata complex’’ (Dinophyta)’

Marine dinoflagellates of the genus Dinophysis are well known for producing diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins and/or pectenotoxins which have a significant impact on public health as well as on marine aquaculture. Out of more than 80 Dinophysis species recorded so far, D. cf. acuminata is the most commonly observed in coastal areas worldwide. Due to their highly similar morphological features, however, an accurate discrimination of the various D. cf. acuminata species such as D. acuminata, D. ovum, and D. sacculus under light microscopy has proven to be a difficult task to accomplish. Hence, these species have thus far been referred to as the “Dinophysis acuminata complex”. Recent studies showed a discrimination between local strains of D. acuminata and D. ovum from Galician, northwestern Spain, using the mitochondrial cox1 gene as a genetic marker in addition to commonly used morphological features such as size and contour of the large hypothecal plates, shape of the small cells formed as part of their polymorphic life-cycle, development of the left sulcal list and ribs, and length of the right sulcal list. In the present study, attempts were made to discriminate between D. acuminata and D. ovum following single-cell isolation of 54 “D. acuminata complex” collected from Korean coastal waters, based on the abovementioned traits. Morphological data showed that all the traits analyzed overlapped between the two species. The mitochondrial cox1 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) gene sequences of every isolate were also determined, but a genetic distinction between D. acuminata and D. ovum could not be confirmed, suggesting that the cox1 gene is not a suitable genetic marker for discrimination between the two species. The results of this study suggest that the morphological variations observed within the “D. acuminata complex” may have been caused by several factors (e.g. different geographical locations, seasonal changes, and different environmental conditions), and that D. acuminata and D. ovum may be the same species.     

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF DINOPHYSIS SPECIES (DINOPHYCEAE) FROM NORWEGIAN WATERS INFERRED FROM SINGLE CELL ANALYSES OF rDNA1

The objectives of this study were to determine rDNA sequences of the most common Dinophysis species in Scandinavian waters and to resolve their phylogenetic relationships within the genus and to other dinoflagellates. A third aim was to examine the intraspecific variation in D. acuminata and D. norvegica, because these two species are highly variable in both morphology and toxicity. We obtained nucleotide sequences of coding (small subunit [SSU], partial large subunit [LSU], 5.8S) and noncoding (internal transcribed spacer [ITS]1, ITS2) parts of the rRNA operon by PCR amplification of one or two Dinophysis cells isolated from natural water samples. The three photosynthetic species D. acuminata, D. acuta, and D. norvegica differed in only 5 to 8 of 1802 base pairs (bp) within the SSU rRNA gene. The nonphotosynthetic D. rotundata (synonym Phalacroma rotundatum[Claparède et Lachmann] Kofoid et Michener), however, differed in approximately 55 bp compared with the three photosynthetic species. In the D1 and D2 domains of LSU rDNA, the phototrophic species differed among themselves by 3 to 12 of 733 bp, whereas they differed from D. rotundata by more than 100 bp. This supports the distinction between Dinophysis and Phalacroma. In the phylogenetic analyses based on SSU rDNA, all Dinophysis species were grouped into a common clade in which D. rotundata diverged first. The results indicate an early divergence of Dinophysis within the Dinophyta. The LSU phylogenetic analyses, including 4 new and 11 Dinophysis sequences from EMBL, identified two major clades within the phototrophic species. Little or no intraspecific genetic variation was found in the ITS1–ITS2 region of single cells of D. norvegica and D. acuminata from Norway, but the delineation between these two species was not always clear.     

Characterization and comparison of toxin‐producing isolates of Dinophysis acuminata from New England and Canada

Following the identification of the first toxic isolate of Dinophysis acuminata from the northwestern Atlantic, we conducted detailed investigations into the morphology, phylogeny, physiology, and toxigenicity of three isolates from three sites within the northeastern U.S./Canada region: Eel Pond and Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, and the Bay of Fundy. Another isolate, collected from the Gulf of Mexico, was grown under the same light, temperature, and prey conditions for comparison. Despite observed phenotypic heterogeneity, morphometrics and molecular evidence classified the three northwestern Atlantic isolates as D. acuminata Claparède & Lachmann, whereas the isolate from the Gulf of Mexico was morphologically identified as D. cf. ovum. Physiological and toxin analyses supported these classifications, with the three northwestern Atlantic isolates being more similar to each other with respect to growth rate, toxin profile, and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxin content (okadaic acid + dinophysistoxin 1/cell) than they were to the isolate from the Gulf of Mexico, which had toxin profiles similar to those published for D. cf. ovum F. Schütt. The DSP toxin content, 0.01–1.8 pg okadaic acid (OA) + dinophysistoxin (DTX1) per cell, of the three northwestern Atlantic isolates was low relative to other D. acuminata strains from elsewhere in the world, consistent with the relative scarcity of shellfish harvesting closures due to DSP toxins in the northeastern U.S. and Canada. If this pattern is repeated with the analyses of more geographically and temporally dispersed isolates from the region, it would appear that the risk of significant DSP toxin outbreaks in the northwestern Atlantic is low to moderate. Finally, the morphological, physiological, and toxicological variability within D. acuminata may reflect spatial (and/or temporal) population structure, and suggests that sub‐specific resolution may be helpful in characterizing bloom dynamics and predicting toxicity.     

Distribution of Dinophysis species and their association with lipophilic phycotoxins in plankton from the Argentine Sea

Dinophysis is a cosmopolitan genus of marine dinoflagellates, considered as the major proximal source of diarrheic shellfish toxins and the only producer of pectenotoxins (PTX). From three oceanographic expeditions carried out during autumn, spring and late summer along the Argentine Sea (∼38–56°S), lipophilic phycotoxins were determined by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) in size-fractionated plankton samples. Lipophilic toxin profiles were associated with species composition by microscopic analyses of toxigenic phytoplankton. Pectenotoxin-2 and PTX-11 were frequently found together with the presence of Dinophysis acuminata and Dinophysis tripos. By contrast, okadaic acid was rarely detected and only in trace concentrations, and dinophysistoxins were not found. The clear predominance of PTX over other lipophilic toxins in Dinophysis species from the Argentine Sea is in accordance with previous results obtained from north Patagonian Gulfs of the Argentine Sea, and from coastal waters of New Zealand, Chile, Denmark and United States. Dinophysis caudata was rarely found and it was confined to the north of the sampling area. Because of low cell densities, neither D. caudata nor Dinophysis norvegica could be biogeographically related to lipophilic toxins in this study. Nevertheless, the current identification of D. norvegica in the southern Argentine Sea is the first record for the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Given the typical toxigenicity of this species on a global scale, this represents an important finding for future surveillance of plankton-toxin associations.     

Real-time PCR Detection of Dinophysis Species in Irish Coastal Waters

Diarrhetic shellfish toxin-producing Dinophysis species occur in Irish coastal waters throughout the year. Dinophysis acuta and Dinophysis acuminata are the most commonly occurring species and are responsible for the majority of closures of Irish mussel farms. This study describes the development of a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for identification of D. acuta and D. acuminata in Irish coastal waters. DNA sequence information for the D1-D2 region of the large ribosomal sub-unit (LSU) was obtained, following single-cell PCR of D. acuta and D. acuminata cells isolated from Irish coastal locations. PCR primers and hybridization probes, specific for the detection of D. acuta, were designed for real-time PCR on the LightCycler™. The LightCycler™ software melt curve analysis programme determined that D. acuta was identified by a melt-peak at 61°C, while D. acuminata cells produced a melt peak at 48°C. The limit of detection of the real-time PCR assay was determined to be one to ten plasmid copies of the LSU D1-D2 target region for both species and one to five D. acuminata cells. Lugol's preserved water samples were also tested with the assay. The real-time PCR assay identified Dinophysis species in 100% of samples found to contain Dinophysis species by light microscopy and had a greater than 90% correlation with light microscopy for identification of D. acuta and D. acuminata in the samples. The assay can identify and discriminate D. acuta and D. acuminata at low numbers in Irish waters and has the potential to add value to the Irish phytoplankton monitoring programme.     

Occurrence of okadaic acid,a major diarrheic shellfish toxin,in natural populations ofDinophysis spp. from the eastern coast of North America

Okadaic acid, one of the principal toxin components implicated in cases of diarrheic shellfish poisoning (DSP), was identified for the first time in natural phytoplankton assemblages from North American waters. During periods in late summer when significant quantities of okadaic acid were detected in net haul samples in the lower estuary and Gulf of St Lawrence in eastern Canada, the phytoplankton community consistently contained species of the dinoflagellate genusDinophysis Ehrenberg. The presence of okadaic acid was detected by screening dinoflagellate extracts with an enzyme-linked immunological assay (ELISA); positive results were confirmed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation, followed by fluorescence detection. Okadaic acid was only found in phytoplankton samples in which the photosynthetic dinophysoid speciesD. norvegica andD. acuminata were prominent; blooms of the related heterotrophic speciesD. rotundata exhibited no trace of okadaic acid, nor other suspected DSP components.     

DSP toxin production de novo in cultures of Dinophysis acuminata (Dinophyceae) from North America

For decades, many aspects of Dinophysis biology have remained intractable due to our inability to maintain these organisms in laboratory cultures. Recent breakthroughs in culture methods have opened the door for detailed investigations of these important algae. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate toxin production in cultures of North American Dinophysis acuminata, isolated from Woods Hole, MA. These findings show that, despite the rarity of Dinophysis-related DSP events in North America, D. acuminata from this area has the ability to produce DSP toxins just as it does in other parts of the world where this species is a major cause of DSP toxicity. In our cultures, D. acuminata cells were observed feeding on Myrionecta rubra using a peduncle. Culture extracts were analyzed using LC–MS/MS, providing unequivocal evidence for the toxin DTX1 in the Dinophysis cultures. In addition, a significant amount of an okadaic acid diol ester, OA-D8, was detected. These results suggest that this Dinophysis isolate stores much of its OA as a diol ester. Also, toxin PTX-2 and a hydroxylated PTX-2 with identical fragmentation mass spectrum to that of PTX-11, but with a different retention time, were detected in this D. acuminata culture. This demonstration of toxin production in cultured North American Dinophysis sets the stage for more detailed studies investigating the causes of geographic differences in toxicity. It is now clear that North American Dinophysis have the ability to produce DSP toxins even though they only rarely cause toxic DSP events in nature. This may reflect environmental conditions that might induce or repress toxin production, genetic differences that cause modifications in toxin gene expression, or physiological and biochemical differences in prey species.     

LC–MS/MS analysis of okadaic acid analogues and other lipophilic toxins in single-cell isolates of several Dinophysis species collected in Hokkaido,Japan

Quantification of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins (okadaic acid analogues), and other lipophilic toxins in single-cell isolates of the dinoflagellates Dinophysis fortii, D. acuminata, D. mitra, D. norvegica, D. tripos, D. infundibulus and D. rotundata, collected in coastal waters Hokkaido, Japan in 2005, was carried out by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Okadaic acid (OA), dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1), 7-O-palmitoyldinophysistoxin-1 (DTX3), pectenotoxin-1 (PTX1), pectenotoxin-11 (PTX11), pectenotoxin-2 (PTX2), pectenotoxin-6 (PTX6), pectenotoxin-2 seco-acid (PTX2sa), yessotoxin (YTX) and 45-hydroxyyessotoxin (45-OHYTX) were quantified by LC–MS/MS. PTX2 was the dominant toxin in D. acuminata, D. norvegica and D. infundibulus whereas both DTX1 and PTX2 were the principal toxins in D. fortii. None of the toxins were detected in D. mitra, D. rotundata and D. tripos. These results suggest that D. fortii is the most important species responsible for DSP contamination of bivalves in Hokkaido. This is the first finding of PTX2 in D. infundibulus, and confirms the presence of PTX2 in Japanese D. acuminata and D. norvegica collected from natural seawater.     

SMALL CELL AND INTERMEDIATE CELL FORMATION IN SPECIES OF DINOPHYSIS (DINOPHYCEAE, DINOPHYSIALES)

Observations of two distinct size classes with similar shape in natural populations of Dinophysis Ehrenberg were first reported by Jorgensen in 1923 and intermediate forms exhibiting a continuum between the typical vegetative cell and a putative small cell by Wood in 1954. Focused attention on Dinophysis spp. associated with diarrhetic shellfish intoxications in the last decade has provided new examples of small cells in the genus, sometimes with contours dissimilar from the corresponding vegetative cells; dimorphic individuals; and large/small cell couplets. This work was based on in situ observations during intensive sampling for cell cycle studies of Dinophysis acuminata Claparéde et Lachmann, Dinophysis acuta Ehrenberg, Dinophysis caudata Saville-Kent, and Dinophysis tripos Gourret; on laboratory incubations of D. acuminata; and on a thorough search of documented information on morphological variability of Dinophysis spp. During in situ division, most dividing cells exhibit a normal longitudinal fission, but some (1%–10%) undergo a “depauperating” fission, leading to pairs of dimorphic cells with dissimilar moieties. After separation and sulcal list regeneration, these dimorphic cells become D. skagii Paulsen, D. dens Pavillard, D. diegensis Kofoid, and D. diegensis Kofoid var. curvata-like individuals, which can also be observed forming couplets D. acuminata/D. skagii, D. acuta/D. dens, and D. caudata/D. diegensis attached by their ventral margins. Small cells can grow again to large size, as shown in laboratory incubations of D. acuminata, thus partly explaining observations of thecal intercalary bands, and intermediate forms. The sexual nature of the small cells will not be unequivocally demonstrated until controlled germination of the alleged cyst forms is achieved, and some intermediate forms may correspond to undescribed stages after cyst germination. These observations suggest common patterns in the life cycle of Dinophysis spp. Intraspecific morphological variability of Dinophysis spp. in a given geographic area can largely be attributed to small cell formation, as a response to changing environmental conditions, and may be a part of the sexual cycle of these species. Small cells seem to be able to enlarge, leading to intermediate cell and further vegetative cell formation as part of a three-looped life history pattern in Dinophysis.     

Seasonal distribution of species of the toxic dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis in Maizuru Bay (Japan), with comments on their autofluorescence and attachment of picophytoplankton

The seasonal distribution of the dinoflagellate genus, Dinophysis, in Maizuru Bay, Japan, was investigated from May 1997 to December 1999. Seven species of Dinophysis were detected, including the toxic species of Dinophysis acuminata and D. fortii. The most dominant species wasD. acuminata, detected year-around and more abundantly during periods when water temperatures were between 15 and 18 °C. No relationship was found between cell abundance of Dinophysis spp. and concentrations of dissolved inorganic nutrients. Phycoerythrin containing nano- and picophytoplankton (cryptophytes and cyanobacteria), suspected to be prey of mixotrophic Dinophysis, were enumerated simultaneously. A clear relationship was not found among the cell abundances of Dinophysis spp. and nano- and picophytoplankton. Autofluorescence of Dinophysis spp. (mainly D. acuminata and D. fortii) under blue-light excitation was usually of a yellow-orange color. Occasionally, Dinophysis spp. had red autofluorescencing and yellow-orange autofluorescencing particles. The proportion of cells possessing red autofluorescence tended to be higher in the warm season. Numerous coccoid cells of picophytoplankton (ca. 1–2 μm in diameter) were found attached to the cell surface of D. acuminata, D. fortii, etc. and food vacuole-like structures also observed. These observations suggest there is a close relationship between mixotrophic Dinophysis spp. and certain picophytoplankton. Based on our observations, the possibility that the picophytoplankton found to be attached onto Dinophysis cell surfaces are a food source for Dinophysis, and a source of DSP toxins, is discussed.     

Relationships between occurrences of toxic Dinophysis species (Dinophyceae) and small phytoplanktons in Japanese coastal waters

Fluctuations of the genus Dinophysis, which contained several toxic species of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP), were investigated during blooms in Hiroshima Bay, Mutsu Bay and Ise Bay, Japan. The co-occurrences of small phytoplanktons (cryptophytes, other nanophytoplanktons, cyanobacteria and eukaryotic picophytoplanktons) were investigated to search for relationships with mixotrophic Dinophysis. Cryptophytes were divided into three size-groups based on length of their chloroplasts (>10, 5–10 and <5 μm) during counting by epifluorescence microscopy. Clear relationships were not found between the occurrences of Dinophysis spp. and nanophytoplanktons, cyanobacteria and eukaryotic picophytoplanktons. However, the fluctuations of small-sized cryptophytes (<5 μm) showed a close relationship with that of D. acuminata in Hiroshima Bay. In Mutsu Bay, small-sized cryptophytes also accompanied the first occurrence peak of Dinophysis spp. In Ise Bay, peaks of the occurrences of middle- and small-sized cryptophytes were observed 2–3 weeks before the peak of D. acuminata. These cryptophytes decreased rapidly with increase in D. acuminata. These results suggest the possibility that small-sized cryptophytes may be food organisms for mixotrophic Dinophysis, with the abundance of Dinophysis dependent on these cryptophytes.     

Dinophysis norvegica (Dinophyceae), more a predator than a producer?

Several studies have proved that some Dinophysis species are capable of ingesting particulate organic matter besides of being photosynthetic, a form of nutrition termed mixotrophy. Phagotrophy may be an important aspect of the life history of the genus Dinophysis and the key to understand its ecology. We used modern techniques coupling flow cytometry and acidotropic probes to detect and score food vacuolated Dinophysis norvegica cells in natural samples. In addition, feeding experiments were conduced under controlled conditions to observe if D. norvegica would grow feeding on the cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia. The results of the field observations showed a frequency of phagotrophy between 25 and 71% in a natural D. norvegica population from the Baltic Sea, which is higher than previous reports (1–20%). Although molecular methods have proved that the kleptoplastids of the D. norvegica from the Baltic Sea are from T. amphioxeia, the laboratory experiments showed that the presence of T. amphioxeia in the cultures did not enhance the survival rate of D. norvegica neither in phototrophic nor in heterotrophic conditions. We suggest that the D. norvegica Kleptoplats are obtained through a heterotrophic or mixotrophic protist, which have been feeding on cryptophytes, as it has recently been shown for Dinophysis acuminata. Our main conclusion is that D. norvegica, and probably all other species from the genus Dinophysis, is mainly phagotrophic and feeds on a larger prey than T. amphioxeia. Autotrophy through kleptoplastidy would be a secondary feature used as a complementary or short-term survival strategy.     

Occurrence ofDinophysis spp. and toxic shellfish in the Northern Adriatic

The dynamics of the toxicity of the musselMytilus galloprovincialis was compared between two different shellfish farms, 5 km apart, but using the same cultivation technique. The main differences concerned the freshwater influx and the open aspect to the Gulf of Trieste. It is suggested that a deep closed bay and abundant fresh water inflow are the two main conditions for the low toxicity levels in mussels and for shorter periods of danger. A detailed study of the phytoplankton samples revealed the presence of eight species ofDinophysis in the area of both shellfish farms. During the period of the DSP outbreak in Slovenia (autumn and winter 1989).D. fortii andD. acuminata were the most frequentDinophysis species. There was a high positive correlation between the onset of mussel toxicity and the appearance ofDinophysis spp.     

PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE FOR THE CRYPTOPHYTE ORIGIN OF THE PLASTID OF DINOPHYSIS (DINOPHYSIALES,DINOPHYCEAE)1

Photosynthetic members of the genus Dinophysis Ehrenberg contain a plastid of uncertain origin. Ultrastructure and pigment analyses suggest that the two‐membrane‐bound plastid of Dinophysis spp. has been acquired through endosymbiosis from a cryptophyte. However, these organisms do not survive in culture, raising the possibility that Dinophysis spp. have a transient kleptoplast. To test the origin and permanence of the plastid of Dinophysis, we sequenced plastid‐encoded psbA and small subunit rDNA from single‐cell isolates of D. acuminata Claparède et Lachman, D. acuta Ehrenberg, and D. norvegica Claparède et Lachman. Phylogenetic analyses confirm the cryptophyte origin of the plastid. Plastid sequences from different populations isolated at different times are monophyletic with robust support and show limited polymorphism. DNA sequencing also revealed plastid sequences of florideophyte origin, indicating that Dinophysis may be feeding on red algae.     

DSP toxin production de novo in cultures of Dinophysis acuminata (Dinophyceae) from North America

For decades, many aspects of Dinophysis biology have remained intractable due to our inability to maintain these organisms in laboratory cultures. Recent breakthroughs in culture methods have opened the door for detailed investigations of these important algae. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate toxin production in cultures of North American Dinophysis acuminata, isolated from Woods Hole, MA. These findings show that, despite the rarity of Dinophysis-related DSP events in North America, D. acuminata from this area has the ability to produce DSP toxins just as it does in other parts of the world where this species is a major cause of DSP toxicity. In our cultures, D. acuminata cells were observed feeding on Myrionecta rubra using a peduncle. Culture extracts were analyzed using LC–MS/MS, providing unequivocal evidence for the toxin DTX1 in the Dinophysis cultures. In addition, a significant amount of an okadaic acid diol ester, OA-D8, was detected. These results suggest that this Dinophysis isolate stores much of its OA as a diol ester. Also, toxin PTX-2 and a hydroxylated PTX-2 with identical fragmentation mass spectrum to that of PTX-11, but with a different retention time, were detected in this D. acuminata culture. This demonstration of toxin production in cultured North American Dinophysis sets the stage for more detailed studies investigating the causes of geographic differences in toxicity. It is now clear that North American Dinophysis have the ability to produce DSP toxins even though they only rarely cause toxic DSP events in nature. This may reflect environmental conditions that might induce or repress toxin production, genetic differences that cause modifications in toxin gene expression, or physiological and biochemical differences in prey species.