Developmental mechanisms of longitudinal stripes in the Japanese four‐lined snake

The developmental mechanisms of color patterns formation and its evolution remain unclear in reptilian sauropsids. We, therefore, studied the pigment cell mechanisms of stripe pattern formation during embryonic development of the snake Elaphe quadrivirgata. We identified 10 post‐ovipositional embryonic developmental stages based on external morphological characteristics. Examination for the temporal changes in differentiation, distribution, and density of pigment cells during embryonic development revealed that melanophores first appeared in myotome and body cavity but not in skin surface at Stage 5. Epidermal melanophores were first recognized at Stage 7, and dermal melanophores and iridophores appeared in Stage 9. Stripe pattern first appeared to establish at Stage 8 as a spatial density gradient of epidermal melanophores between the regions of future dark brown longitudinal stripes and light colored background. Our study, thus, provides a comprehensive pigment‐cell‐based understanding of stripe pattern formation during embryonic development. We briefly discuss the importance of the gene expression studies by considering the biologically relevant theoretical models with standard developmental staging for understanding reptilian color pattern evolution.     

Dlx5 specifically regulates Runx2 type II expression by binding to homeodomain-response elements in the Runx2 distal promoter

Two major isoforms of the Runx2 gene are expressed by alternative promoter usage: Runx2 type I (Runx2-I) is derived from the proximal promoter (P2), and Runx2 type II (Runx2-II) is produced by the distal promoter (P1). Our previous results indicate that Dlx5 mediates BMP-2-induced Runx2 expression and osteoblast differentiation (Lee, M.-H., Kim, Y-J., Kim, H-J., Park, H-D., Kang, A-R., Kyung, H.-M., Sung, J-H., Wozney, J. M., Kim, H-J., and Ryoo, H-M. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34387-34394). However, little is known of the molecular mechanisms by which Dlx5 up-regulates Runx2 expression in BMP-2 signaling. Here, Runx2-II expression was found to be specifically stimulated by BMP-2 treatment or by Dlx5 overexpression. In addition, BMP-2, Dlx5, and Runx2-II were found to be expressed in osteogenic fronts and parietal bones of the developing cranial vault and Runx2-I and Msx2 in the sutural mesenchyme. Furthermore, Runx2 P1 promoter activity was strongly stimulated by Dlx5 overexpression, whereas Runx2 P2 promoter activity was not. Runx2 P1 promoter deletion analysis indicated that the Dlx5-specific response is due to sequences between -756 and -342 bp of the P1 promoter, where three Dlx5-response elements are located. Dlx5 responsiveness to these elements was confirmed by gel mobility shift assay and site-directed mutagenesis. Moreover, Msx2 specifically suppressed the Runx2 P1 promoter, and the responsible region overlaps with that recognized by Dlx5. In summary, Dlx5 specifically transactivates the Runx2 P1 promoter, and its action on the P1 promoter is antagonized by Msx2.     

Msx1creERT2 knock‐In allele: A useful tool to target embryonic and adult cardiac valves

Summary : Heart valve development begins with the endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) of endocardial cells. Although lineage studies have demonstrated contributions from cardiac neural crest and epicardium to semilunar and atrioventricular (AV) valve formation, respectively, most valve mesenchyme derives from the endocardial EMT. Specific Cre mouse lines for fate‐mapping analyses of valve endocardial cells are limited. Msx1 displayed expression in AV canal endocardium and cushion mesenchyme between E9.5 and E11.5, when EMT is underway. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that deletion of Msx1 and its paralog Msx2 results in hypoplastic AV cushions and impaired endocardial signaling. A knock‐in tamoxifen‐inducible Cre line was recently generated (Msx1^CreERT2) and characterized during embryonic development and after birth, and was shown to recapitulate the endogenous Msx1 expression pattern. Here, we further analyze this knock‐in allele and track the Msx1‐expressing cells and their descendants during cardiac development with a particular focus on their contribution to the valves and their precursors. Thus, Msx1^CreERT2 mice represent a useful model for lineage tracing and conditional gene manipulation of endocardial and mesenchymal cushion cells essential to understand mechanisms of valve development and remodeling. genesis 53:337–345, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate frontal bone development

The Msx and Dlx families of homeobox proteins are important regulators for embryogenesis. Loss of Msx1 in mice results in multiple developmental defects including craniofacial malformations. Although Dlx5 is widely expressed during embryonic development, targeted null mutation of Dlx5 mainly affects the development of craniofacial bones. Msx1 and Dlx5 show overlapping expression patterns during frontal bone development. To investigate the functional significance of Msx1/Dlx5 interaction in regulating frontal bone development, we generated Msx1 and Dlx5 double null mutant mice. In Msx1^?/?;Dlx5^?/? mice, the frontal bones defect was more severe than that of either Msx1^?/? or Dlx5^?/? mice. This aggravated frontal bone defect suggests that Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate osteogenesis. This synergistic effect of Msx1 and Dlx5 on the frontal bone represents a tissue specific mode of interaction of the Msx and Dlx genes. Furthermore, Dlx5 requires Msx1 for its expression in the context of frontal bone development. Our study shows that Msx1/Dlx5 interaction is crucial for osteogenic induction during frontal bone development. genesis 48:645–655, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Contribution of SATB2 to the stronger osteogenic potential of bone marrow stromal cells from craniofacial bones

Previous studies have shown that craniofacial bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) have a strong osteogenic potential. However, the mechanism by which BMSCs of various embryonic origins develop diverse osteogenic potentials remains unclear. To investigate the mechanisms regulating osteoblast differentiation in two different types of BMSCs, we compared the temporal and spatial mRNA and protein expression patterns of Satb2 and its downstream gene Hoxa2 by using real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting and fluorescent immunostaining in mandible BMSCs (M-BMSCs) and tibia BMSCs (T-BMSCs) undergoing osteoblast differentiation. Higher levels of alkaline phosphatase, greater calcium accumulation and earlier expression of Runx2 were observed in osteogenic-induced M-BMSCs compared with T-BMSCs. Low levels of Satb2 were detected in both types of uninduced BMSCs but the majority of SATB2 was located in the nuclei of M-BMSCs. Notably, Satb2 was expressed earlier in M-BMSCs and Hoxa2, a downstream target of Satb2, was not expressed in uninduced M-BMSCs or during osteoblast differentiation, just as during embryonic mandible development. In contrast, Hoxa2 was reactivated in T-BMSCs during osteoblast differentiation. Based on these results, we conclude that SATB2 plays a different role during osteoblast differentiation of M-BMSCs and T-BMSCs. The earlier activation of Satb2 expression in M-BMSCs compared with T-BMSCs might explain the stronger osteogenic potential of M-BMSCs.     

Evolution of a developmental mechanism: Species-specific regulation of the cell cycle and the timing of events during craniofacial osteogenesis

Neural crest mesenchyme (NCM) controls species-specific pattern in the craniofacial skeleton but how this cell population accomplishes such a complex task remains unclear. To elucidate mechanisms through which NCM directs skeletal development and evolution, we made chimeras from quail and duck embryos, which differ markedly in their craniofacial morphology and maturation rates. We show that quail NCM, when transplanted into duck, maintains its faster timetable for development and autonomously executes molecular and cellular programs for the induction, differentiation, and mineralization of bone, including premature expression of osteogenic genes such as Runx2 and Col1a1. In contrast, the duck host systemic environment appears to be relatively permissive and supports osteogenesis independently by providing circulating minerals and a vascular network. Further experiments reveal that NCM establishes the timing of osteogenesis by regulating cell cycle progression in a stage- and species-specific manner. Altering the time-course of D-type cyclin expression mimics chimeras by accelerating expression of Runx2 and Col1a1. We also discover higher endogenous expression of Runx2 in quail coincident with their smaller craniofacial skeletons, and by prematurely over-expressing Runx2 in chick embryos we reduce the overall size of the craniofacial skeleton. Thus, our work indicates that NCM establishes species-specific size in the craniofacial skeleton by controlling cell cycle, Runx2 expression, and the timing of key events during osteogenesis.     

TGFβ-induced factor homeobox 2 blocks osteoblastic differentiation through targeting pSmad3/HDAC4/H4ac/Runx2 axis

TGFβ-induced factor homeobox 2 (Tgif2) has been reported as a functional role in cell homeostasis and a key activator of osteoclastogenesis and bone loss, as well. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the potential role of Tgif2 on osteogenic differentiation. Tgif2 expression was assessed during the osteogenic differentiation process of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and primary calvarial osteoblasts (OBs). The expression of Tgif2 in BMSCs and OBs increased by using lentivirus-mediated gene overexpression (OE). The effect of Tgif2 on osteogenic differentiation was compared between Tgif2 negative control (Tgif2-NC) and Tgif2-OE group in BMSCs/OBs via performing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay, mineralization assay, and gene expression analysis of some osteogenic markers. To investigate the molecular mechanism, the direct interaction of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) and pSmad3, acetylated histone H4 (H4ac), and Runx2-binding site of the Ocn promoter was confirmed by performing co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, respectively. The results showed that Tgif2 abundantly expressed in BMSCs and primary calvarial OBs, but decreased after osteogenic induction. In vitro, osteogenic differentiation was significantly inhibited with Tgif2 overexpression in both BMSCs and OBs, as well as the expression levels of osteogenic markers (Runx2, Sp7, Alp, and Ocn). Moreover, we found that Tgif2 overexpression significantly promoted the interaction of pSmad3 with HDAC4 in differentiated OBs, and sequentially decreased the abundance of H4ac at the Runx2-binding site of the Ocn promoter. These findings indicated that Tgif2 might block osteoblastic differentiation in vitro through targeting pSmad3/HDAC4/H4ac/Runx2 axis.     

Multiple calvarial defects in lmx1b mutant mice

The vertebrate cranial vault, or calvaria, forms during embryonic development from cranial mesenchyme of multiple embryonic origins. Inductive interactions are thought to specify the number and location of the calvarial bones, including interactions between the neuroepithelium and cranial mesenchyme. An important feature of calvarial development is the local inhibition of osteogenic potential which occurs between specific bones and results in the formation of the cranial sutures. These sutures allow for postnatal growth of the skull to accommodate postnatal increase in brain size. The molecular genetic mechanisms responsible for the patterning of individual calvarial bones and for the specification of the number and location of sutures are poorly understood at the molecular genetic level. Here we report on the function and expression pattern of the LIM-homeodomain gene, lmx1b, during calvarial development. Lmx1b is expressed in the neuroepithelium underlying portions of the developing skull and in cranial mesenchym which contributes to portions of the cranial vault. Lmx1b is essential for proper patterning and morphogenesis of the calvaria since the supraoccipital and interparietal bones of lmx1b mutant mice are either missing or severely reduced. Moreover, lmx1b mutant mice have severely abnormal sutures between the frontal, parietal, and interparietal bones. Our results indicate that lmx1b is required for multiple events in calvarial development and suggest possible genetic interaction with other genes known to regulate skull development and suture formation. Dev. Genet. 22:314–320, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.