SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid suppresses host pyroptosis by blocking Gasdermin D cleavage

SARS‐CoV‐2 is an emerging coronavirus that causes dysfunctions in multiple human cells and tissues. Studies have looked at the entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 into host cells mediated by the viral spike protein and human receptor ACE2. However, less is known about the cellular immune responses triggered by SARS‐CoV‐2 viral proteins. Here, we show that the nucleocapsid of SARS‐CoV‐2 inhibits host pyroptosis by blocking Gasdermin D (GSDMD) cleavage. SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected monocytes show enhanced cellular interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) expression, but reduced IL‐1β secretion. While SARS‐CoV‐2 infection promotes activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and caspase‐1, GSDMD cleavage and pyroptosis are inhibited in infected human monocytes. SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid protein associates with GSDMD in cells and inhibits GSDMD cleavage in vitro and in vivo. The nucleocapsid binds the GSDMD linker region and hinders GSDMD processing by caspase‐1. These insights into how SARS‐CoV‐2 antagonizes cellular inflammatory responses may open new avenues for treating COVID‐19 in the future.     

Biparatopic nanobodies protect mice from lethal challenge with SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern

The ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic and the emergence of new SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern (VOCs) requires continued development of effective therapeutics. Recently, we identified high‐affinity neutralizing nanobodies (Nbs) specific for the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of SARS‐CoV‐2. Taking advantage of detailed epitope mapping, we generate two biparatopic Nbs (bipNbs) targeting a conserved epitope outside and two different epitopes inside the RBD:ACE2 interface. Both bipNbs bind all currently circulating VOCs with high affinities and are capable to neutralize cellular infection with VOC B.1.351 (Beta) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) in vitro. To assess if the bipNbs NM1267 and NM1268 confer protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in vivo, human ACE2 transgenic mice are treated intranasally before infection with a lethal dose of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1, B.1.351 (Beta) or B.1.617.2 (Delta). Nb‐treated mice show significantly reduced disease progression and increased survival rates. Histopathological analyses further reveal a drastically reduced viral load and inflammatory response in lungs. These data suggest that both bipNbs are broadly active against a variety of emerging SARS‐CoV‐2 VOCs and represent easily applicable drug candidates.     

ADAM10 and ADAM17 promote SARS‐CoV‐2 cell entry and spike protein‐mediated lung cell fusion

The severe‐acute‐respiratory‐syndrome‐coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is the causative agent of COVID‐19, but host cell factors contributing to COVID‐19 pathogenesis remain only partly understood. We identify the host metalloprotease ADAM17 as a facilitator of SARS‐CoV‐2 cell entry and the metalloprotease ADAM10 as a host factor required for lung cell syncytia formation, a hallmark of COVID‐19 pathology. ADAM10 and ADAM17, which are broadly expressed in the human lung, cleave the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein (S) in vitro, indicating that ADAM10 and ADAM17 contribute to the priming of S, an essential step for viral entry and cell fusion. ADAM protease‐targeted inhibitors severely impair lung cell infection by the SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern alpha, beta, delta, and omicron and also reduce SARS‐CoV‐2 infection of primary human lung cells in a TMPRSS2 protease‐independent manner. Our study establishes ADAM10 and ADAM17 as host cell factors for viral entry and syncytia formation and defines both proteases as potential targets for antiviral drug development.     

Molecular basis of cross‐species ACE2 interactions with SARS‐CoV‐2‐like viruses of pangolin origin

Pangolins have been suggested as potential reservoir of zoonotic viruses, including SARS‐CoV‐2 causing the global COVID‐19 outbreak. Here, we study the binding of two SARS‐CoV‐2‐like viruses isolated from pangolins, GX/P2V/2017 and GD/1/2019, to human angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), the receptor of SARS‐CoV‐2. We find that the spike protein receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of pangolin CoVs binds to hACE2 as efficiently as the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD in vitro. Furthermore, incorporation of pangolin CoV RBDs allows entry of pseudotyped VSV particles into hACE2‐expressing cells. A screen for binding of pangolin CoV RBDs to ACE2 orthologs from various species suggests a broader host range than that of SARS‐CoV‐2. Additionally, cryo‐EM structures of GX/P2V/2017 and GD/1/2019 RBDs in complex with hACE2 show their molecular binding in modes similar to SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD. Introducing the Q498H substitution found in pangolin CoVs into the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD expands its binding capacity to ACE2 homologs of mouse, rat, and European hedgehog. These findings suggest that these two pangolin CoVs may infect humans, highlighting the necessity of further surveillance of pangolin CoVs.     

Identification of lectin receptors for conserved SARS‐CoV‐2 glycosylation sites

New SARS‐CoV‐2 variants are continuously emerging with critical implications for therapies or vaccinations. The 22 N‐glycan sites of Spike remain highly conserved among SARS‐CoV‐2 variants, opening an avenue for robust therapeutic intervention. Here we used a comprehensive library of mammalian carbohydrate‐binding proteins (lectins) to probe critical sugar residues on the full‐length trimeric Spike and the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS‐CoV‐2. Two lectins, Clec4g and CD209c, were identified to strongly bind to Spike. Clec4g and CD209c binding to Spike was dissected and visualized in real time and at single‐molecule resolution using atomic force microscopy. 3D modelling showed that both lectins can bind to a glycan within the RBD‐ACE2 interface and thus interferes with Spike binding to cell surfaces. Importantly, Clec4g and CD209c significantly reduced SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. These data report the first extensive map and 3D structural modelling of lectin‐Spike interactions and uncovers candidate receptors involved in Spike binding and SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. The capacity of CLEC4G and mCD209c lectins to block SARS‐CoV‐2 viral entry holds promise for pan‐variant therapeutic interventions.     

Infection and transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 depend on heparan sulfate proteoglycans

The current pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and outbreaks of new variants highlight the need for preventive treatments. Here, we identified heparan sulfate proteoglycans as attachment receptors for SARS‐CoV‐2. Notably, neutralizing antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 isolated from COVID‐19 patients interfered with SARS‐CoV‐2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which might be an additional mechanism of antibodies to neutralize infection. SARS‐CoV‐2 binding to and infection of epithelial cells was blocked by low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). Although dendritic cells (DCs) and mucosal Langerhans cells (LCs) were not infected by SARS‐CoV‐2, both DC subsets efficiently captured SARS‐CoV‐2 via heparan sulfate proteoglycans and transmitted the virus to ACE2‐positive cells. Notably, human primary nasal cells were infected by SARS‐CoV‐2, and infection was blocked by pre‐treatment with LMWH. These data strongly suggest that heparan sulfate proteoglycans are important attachment receptors facilitating infection and transmission, and support the use of LMWH as prophylaxis against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.     

Multiple sites on SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein are susceptible to proteolysis by cathepsins B,K, L,S, and V

SARS‐CoV‐2 is the coronavirus responsible for the COVID‐19 pandemic. Proteases are central to the infection process of SARS‐CoV‐2. Cleavage of the spike protein on the virus''s capsid causes the conformational change that leads to membrane fusion and viral entry into the target cell. Since inhibition of one protease, even the dominant protease like TMPRSS2, may not be sufficient to block SARS‐CoV‐2 entry into cells, other proteases that may play an activating role and hydrolyze the spike protein must be identified. We identified amino acid sequences in all regions of spike protein, including the S1/S2 region critical for activation and viral entry, that are susceptible to cleavage by furin and cathepsins B, K, L, S, and V using PACMANS, a computational platform that identifies and ranks preferred sites of proteolytic cleavage on substrates, and verified with molecular docking analysis and immunoblotting to determine if binding of these proteases can occur on the spike protein that were identified as possible cleavage sites. Together, this study highlights cathepsins B, K, L, S, and V for consideration in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and presents methodologies by which other proteases can be screened to determine a role in viral entry. This highlights additional proteases to be considered in COVID‐19 studies, particularly regarding exacerbated damage in inflammatory preconditions where these proteases are generally upregulated.     

TNF‐α/IFN‐γ synergy amplifies senescence‐associated inflammation and SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor expression via hyper‐activated JAK/STAT1

Older age and underlying conditions such as diabetes/obesity or immunosuppression are leading host risk factors for developing severe complications from COVID‐19 infection. The pathogenesis of COVID‐19‐related cytokine storm, tissue damage, and fibrosis may be interconnected with fundamental aging processes, including dysregulated immune responses and cellular senescence. Here, we examined effects of key cytokines linked to cellular senescence on expression of SARS‐CoV‐2 viral entry receptors. We found exposure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to the inflammatory cytokines, TNF‐α + IFN‐γ or a cocktail of TNF‐α + IFN‐γ + IL‐6, increased expression of ACE2/DPP4, accentuated the pro‐inflammatory senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP), and decreased cellular proliferative capacity, consistent with progression towards a cellular senescence‐like state. IL‐6 by itself failed to induce substantial effects on viral entry receptors or SASP‐related genes, while synergy between TNF‐α and IFN‐γ initiated a positive feedback loop via hyper‐activation of the JAK/STAT1 pathway, causing SASP amplification. Breaking the interactive loop between senescence and cytokine secretion with JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib or antiviral drug remdesivir prevented hyper‐inflammation, normalized SARS‐CoV‐2 entry receptor expression, and restored HUVECs proliferative capacity. This loop appears to underlie cytokine‐mediated viral entry receptor activation and links with senescence and hyper‐inflammation.     

TMPRSS2 expression dictates the entry route used by SARS‐CoV‐2 to infect host cells

SARS‐CoV‐2 is a newly emerged coronavirus that caused the global COVID‐19 outbreak in early 2020. COVID‐19 is primarily associated with lung injury, but many other clinical symptoms such as loss of smell and taste demonstrated broad tissue tropism of the virus. Early SARS‐CoV‐2–host cell interactions and entry mechanisms remain poorly understood. Investigating SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in tissue culture, we found that the protease TMPRSS2 determines the entry pathway used by the virus. In the presence of TMPRSS2, the proteolytic process of SARS‐CoV‐2 was completed at the plasma membrane, and the virus rapidly entered the cells within 10 min in a pH‐independent manner. When target cells lacked TMPRSS2 expression, the virus was endocytosed and sorted into endolysosomes, from which SARS‐CoV‐2 entered the cytosol via acid‐activated cathepsin L protease 40–60 min post‐infection. Overexpression of TMPRSS2 in non‐TMPRSS2 expressing cells abolished the dependence of infection on the cathepsin L pathway and restored sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitors. Together, our results indicate that SARS‐CoV‐2 infects cells through distinct, mutually exclusive entry routes and highlight the importance of TMPRSS2 for SARS‐CoV‐2 sorting into either pathway.     

Interactomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 and human coronaviruses reveal host factors potentially affecting pathogenesis

Host–virus protein–protein interactions play key roles in the life cycle of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). We conducted a comprehensive interactome study between the virus and host cells using tandem affinity purification and proximity‐labeling strategies and identified 437 human proteins as the high‐confidence interacting proteins. Further characterization of these interactions and comparison to other large‐scale study of cellular responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection elucidated how distinct SARS‐CoV‐2 viral proteins participate in its life cycle. With these data mining, we discovered potential drug targets for the treatment of COVID‐19. The interactomes of two key SARS‐CoV‐2‐encoded viral proteins, NSP1 and N, were compared with the interactomes of their counterparts in other human coronaviruses. These comparisons not only revealed common host pathways these viruses manipulate for their survival, but also showed divergent protein–protein interactions that may explain differences in disease pathology. This comprehensive interactome of SARS‐CoV‐2 provides valuable resources for the understanding and treating of this disease.     

Structural basis for the interaction of SARS‐CoV‐2 virulence factor nsp1 with DNA polymerase α–primase

The molecular mechanisms that drive the infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)—the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)—are under intense current scrutiny to understand how the virus operates and to uncover ways in which the disease can be prevented or alleviated. Recent proteomic screens of the interactions between viral and host proteins have identified the human proteins targeted by SARS‐CoV‐2. The DNA polymerase α (Pol α)–primase complex or primosome—responsible for initiating DNA synthesis during genomic duplication—was identified as a target of nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a major virulence factor in the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Here, we validate the published reports of the interaction of nsp1 with the primosome by demonstrating direct binding with purified recombinant components and providing a biochemical characterization of their interaction. Furthermore, we provide a structural basis for the interaction by elucidating the cryo‐electron microscopy structure of nsp1 bound to the primosome. Our findings provide biochemical evidence for the reported targeting of Pol α by the virulence factor nsp1 and suggest that SARS‐CoV‐2 interferes with Pol α''s putative role in the immune response during the viral infection.     

Opposing activities of IFITM proteins in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Interferon‐induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) restrict infections by many viruses, but a subset of IFITMs enhance infections by specific coronaviruses through currently unknown mechanisms. We show that SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike‐pseudotyped virus and genuine SARS‐CoV‐2 infections are generally restricted by human and mouse IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3, using gain‐ and loss‐of‐function approaches. Mechanistically, SARS‐CoV‐2 restriction occurred independently of IFITM3 S‐palmitoylation, indicating a restrictive capacity distinct from reported inhibition of other viruses. In contrast, the IFITM3 amphipathic helix and its amphipathic properties were required for virus restriction. Mutation of residues within the IFITM3 endocytosis‐promoting YxxФ motif converted human IFITM3 into an enhancer of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, and cell‐to‐cell fusion assays confirmed the ability of endocytic mutants to enhance Spike‐mediated fusion with the plasma membrane. Overexpression of TMPRSS2, which increases plasma membrane fusion versus endosome fusion of SARS‐CoV‐2, attenuated IFITM3 restriction and converted amphipathic helix mutants into infection enhancers. In sum, we uncover new pro‐ and anti‐viral mechanisms of IFITM3, with clear distinctions drawn between enhancement of viral infection at the plasma membrane and amphipathicity‐based mechanisms used for endosomal SARS‐CoV‐2 restriction.     

Genome‐scale metabolic modeling reveals SARS‐CoV‐2‐induced metabolic changes and antiviral targets

Tremendous progress has been made to control the COVID‐19 pandemic caused by the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. However, effective therapeutic options are still rare. Drug repurposing and combination represent practical strategies to address this urgent unmet medical need. Viruses, including coronaviruses, are known to hijack host metabolism to facilitate viral proliferation, making targeting host metabolism a promising antiviral approach. Here, we describe an integrated analysis of 12 published in vitro and human patient gene expression datasets on SARS‐CoV‐2 infection using genome‐scale metabolic modeling (GEM), revealing complicated host metabolism reprogramming during SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We next applied the GEM‐based metabolic transformation algorithm to predict anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 targets that counteract the virus‐induced metabolic changes. We successfully validated these targets using published drug and genetic screen data and by performing an siRNA assay in Caco‐2 cells. Further generating and analyzing RNA‐sequencing data of remdesivir‐treated Vero E6 cell samples, we predicted metabolic targets acting in combination with remdesivir, an approved anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 drug. Our study provides clinical data‐supported candidate anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 targets for future evaluation, demonstrating host metabolism targeting as a promising antiviral strategy.     

A virus‐derived microRNA targets immune response genes during SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection results in impaired interferon response in patients with severe COVID‐19. However, how SARS‐CoV‐2 interferes with host immune responses is incompletely understood. Here, we sequence small RNAs from SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected human cells and identify a microRNA (miRNA) derived from a recently evolved region of the viral genome. We show that the virus‐derived miRNA produces two miRNA isoforms in infected cells by the enzyme Dicer, which are loaded into Argonaute proteins. Moreover, the predominant miRNA isoform targets the 3′UTR of interferon‐stimulated genes and represses their expression in a miRNA‐like fashion. Finally, the two viral miRNA isoforms were detected in nasopharyngeal swabs from COVID‐19 patients. We propose that SARS‐CoV‐2 can potentially employ a virus‐derived miRNA to hijack the host miRNA machinery, which could help to evade the interferon‐mediated immune response.     

Human phospho‐signaling networks of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are rewired by population genetic variants

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection hijacks signaling pathways and induces protein–protein interactions between human and viral proteins. Human genetic variation may impact SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 pathology; however, the genetic variation in these signaling networks remains uncharacterized. Here, we studied human missense single nucleotide variants (SNVs) altering phosphorylation sites modulated by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, using machine learning to identify amino acid substitutions altering kinase‐bound sequence motifs. We found 2,033 infrequent phosphorylation‐associated SNVs (pSNVs) that are enriched in sequence motif alterations, potentially reflecting the evolution of signaling networks regulating host defenses. Proteins with pSNVs are involved in viral life cycle and host responses, including RNA splicing, interferon response (TRIM28), and glucose homeostasis (TBC1D4) with potential associations with COVID‐19 comorbidities. pSNVs disrupt CDK and MAPK substrate motifs and replace these with motifs of Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) involved in innate immune responses, indicating consistent rewiring of signaling networks. Several pSNVs associate with severe COVID‐19 and hospitalization (STARD13, ARFGEF2). Our analysis highlights potential genetic factors contributing to inter‐individual variation of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 and suggests leads for mechanistic and translational studies.Subject Categories: Computational Biology, Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction, Post-translational Modifications & Proteolysis

An integrative proteogenomic study reveals that human phospho‐signaling networks responding to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are enriched in genetic variants that modify kinase binding motifs, suggesting that genetic variation may impact infection and COVID‐19 pathology.     

Nonproductive exposure of PBMCs to SARS‐CoV‐2 induces cell‐intrinsic innate immune responses

Cell‐intrinsic responses mounted in PBMCs during mild and severe COVID‐19 differ quantitatively and qualitatively. Whether they are triggered by signals emitted by productively infected cells of the respiratory tract or result from physical interaction with virus particles remains unclear. Here, we analyzed susceptibility and expression profiles of PBMCs from healthy donors upon ex vivo exposure to SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2. In line with the absence of detectable ACE2 receptor expression, human PBMCs were refractory to productive infection. RT–PCR experiments and single‐cell RNA sequencing revealed JAK/STAT‐dependent induction of interferon‐stimulated genes (ISGs) but not proinflammatory cytokines. This SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific response was most pronounced in monocytes. SARS‐CoV‐2‐RNA‐positive monocytes displayed a lower ISG signature as compared to bystander cells of the identical culture. This suggests a preferential invasion of cells with a low ISG baseline profile or delivery of a SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific sensing antagonist upon efficient particle internalization. Together, nonproductive physical interaction of PBMCs with SARS‐CoV‐2‐ and, to a much lesser extent, SARS‐CoV particles stimulate JAK/STAT‐dependent, monocyte‐accentuated innate immune responses that resemble those detected in vivo in patients with mild COVID‐19.