BRCA2 promotes DNA‐RNA hybrid resolution by DDX5 helicase at DNA breaks to facilitate their repair

The BRCA2 tumor suppressor is a DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair factor essential for maintaining genome integrity. BRCA2‐deficient cells spontaneously accumulate DNA‐RNA hybrids, a known source of genome instability. However, the specific role of BRCA2 on these structures remains poorly understood. Here we identified the DEAD‐box RNA helicase DDX5 as a BRCA2‐interacting protein. DDX5 associates with DNA‐RNA hybrids that form in the vicinity of DSBs, and this association is enhanced by BRCA2. Notably, BRCA2 stimulates the DNA‐RNA hybrid‐unwinding activity of DDX5 helicase. An impaired BRCA2‐DDX5 interaction, as observed in cells expressing the breast cancer variant BRCA2‐T207A, reduces the association of DDX5 with DNA‐RNA hybrids, decreases the number of RPA foci, and alters the kinetics of appearance of RAD51 foci upon irradiation. Our findings are consistent with DNA‐RNA hybrids constituting an impediment for the repair of DSBs by homologous recombination and reveal BRCA2 and DDX5 as active players in their removal.     

PIF1 helicase promotes break‐induced replication in mammalian cells

Break‐induced replication (BIR) is a specialized homologous‐recombination pathway for DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair, which often induces genome instability. In this study, we establish EGFP‐based recombination reporters to systematically study BIR in mammalian cells and demonstrate an important role of human PIF1 helicase in promoting BIR. We show that at endonuclease cleavage sites, PIF1‐dependent BIR is used for homology‐initiated recombination requiring long track DNA synthesis, but not short track gene conversion (STGC). We also show that structure formation‐prone AT‐rich DNA sequences derived from common fragile sites (CFS‐ATs) induce BIR upon replication stress and oncogenic stress, and PCNA‐dependent loading of PIF1 onto collapsed/broken forks is critical for BIR activation. At broken replication forks, even STGC‐mediated repair of double‐ended DSBs depends on POLD3 and PIF1, revealing an unexpected mechanism of BIR activation upon replication stress that differs from the conventional BIR activation model requiring DSB end sensing at endonuclease‐generated breaks. Furthermore, loss of PIF1 is synthetically lethal with loss of FANCM, which is involved in protecting CFS‐ATs. The breast cancer‐associated PIF1 mutant L319P is defective in BIR, suggesting a direct link of BIR to oncogenic processes.     

CDK2 phosphorylation of Werner protein (WRN) contributes to WRN’s DNA double‐strand break repair pathway choice

Werner syndrome (WS) is an accelerated aging disorder characterized by genomic instability, which is caused by WRN protein deficiency. WRN participates in DNA metabolism including DNA repair. In a previous report, we showed that WRN protein is recruited to laser‐induced DNA double‐strand break (DSB) sites during various stages of the cell cycle with similar intensities, supporting that WRN participates in both non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Here, we demonstrate that the phosphorylation of WRN by CDK2 on serine residue 426 is critical for WRN to make its DSB repair pathway choice between NHEJ and HR. Cells expressing WRN engineered to mimic the unphosphorylated or phosphorylation state at serine 426 showed abnormal DSB recruitment, altered RPA interaction, strand annealing, and DSB repair activities. The CDK2 phosphorylation on serine 426 stabilizes WRN’s affinity for RPA, likely increasing its long‐range resection at the end of DNA strands, which is a crucial step for HR. Collectively, the data shown here demonstrate that a CDK2‐dependent phosphorylation of WRN regulates DSB repair pathway choice and cell cycle participation.     

Dipeptidyl peptidase 9 triggers BRCA2 degradation and promotes DNA damage repair

N‐terminal sequences are important sites for post‐translational modifications that alter protein localization, activity, and stability. Dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9) is a serine aminopeptidase with the rare ability to cleave off N‐terminal dipeptides with imino acid proline in the second position. Here, we identify the tumor‐suppressor BRCA2 as a DPP9 substrate and show this interaction to be induced by DNA damage. We present crystallographic structures documenting intracrystalline enzymatic activity of DPP9, with the N‐terminal Met1‐Pro2 of a BRCA21‐40 peptide captured in its active site. Intriguingly, DPP9‐depleted cells are hypersensitive to genotoxic agents and are impaired in the repair of DNA double‐strand breaks by homologous recombination. Mechanistically, DPP9 targets BRCA2 for degradation and promotes the formation of RAD51 foci, the downstream function of BRCA2. N‐terminal truncation mutants of BRCA2 that mimic a DPP9 product phenocopy reduced BRCA2 stability and rescue RAD51 foci formation in DPP9‐deficient cells. Taken together, we present DPP9 as a regulator of BRCA2 stability and propose that by fine‐tuning the cellular concentrations of BRCA2, DPP9 alters the BRCA2 interactome, providing a possible explanation for DPP9''s role in cancer.     

Mechanisms restraining break‐induced replication at two‐ended DNA double‐strand breaks

DNA synthesis during homologous recombination is highly mutagenic and prone to template switches. Two‐ended DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) are usually repaired by gene conversion with a short patch of DNA synthesis, thus limiting the mutation load to the vicinity of the DSB. Single‐ended DSBs are repaired by break‐induced replication (BIR), which involves extensive and mutagenic DNA synthesis spanning up to hundreds of kilobases. It remains unknown how mutagenic BIR is suppressed at two‐ended DSBs. Here, we demonstrate that BIR is suppressed at two‐ended DSBs by proteins coordinating the usage of two ends of a DSB: (i) ssDNA annealing proteins Rad52 and Rad59 that promote second end capture, (ii) D‐loop unwinding helicase Mph1, and (iii) Mre11‐Rad50‐Xrs2 complex that promotes synchronous resection of two ends of a DSB. Finally, BIR is also suppressed when Sir2 silences a normally heterochromatic repair template. All of these proteins are particularly important for limiting BIR when recombination occurs between short repetitive sequences, emphasizing the significance of these mechanisms for species carrying many repetitive elements such as humans.     

DNA asymmetry promotes SUMO modification of the single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein RPA

Repair of DNA double‐stranded breaks by homologous recombination (HR) is dependent on DNA end resection and on post‐translational modification of repair factors. In budding yeast, single‐stranded DNA is coated by replication protein A (RPA) following DNA end resection, and DNA–RPA complexes are then SUMO‐modified by the E3 ligase Siz2 to promote repair. Here, we show using enzymatic assays that DNA duplexes containing 3'' single‐stranded DNA overhangs increase the rate of RPA SUMO modification by Siz2. The SAP domain of Siz2 binds DNA duplexes and makes a key contribution to this process as highlighted by models and a crystal structure of Siz2 and by assays performed using protein mutants. Enzymatic assays performed using DNA that can accommodate multiple RPA proteins suggest a model in which the SUMO‐RPA signal is amplified by successive rounds of Siz2‐dependent SUMO modification of RPA and dissociation of SUMO‐RPA at the junction between single‐ and double‐stranded DNA. Our results provide insights on how DNA architecture scaffolds a substrate and E3 ligase to promote SUMO modification in the context of DNA repair.     

DNA End Resection: Nucleases Team Up with the Right Partners to Initiate Homologous Recombination

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination commences by nucleolytic degradation of the 5′-terminated strand of the DNA break. This leads to the formation of 3′-tailed DNA, which serves as a substrate for the strand exchange protein Rad51. The nucleoprotein filament then invades homologous DNA to drive template-directed repair. In this review, I discuss mainly the mechanisms of DNA end resection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which includes short-range resection by Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2, as well as processive long-range resection by Sgs1-Dna2 or Exo1 pathways. Resection mechanisms are highly conserved between yeast and humans, and analogous machineries are found in prokaryotes as well.     

Synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition in cancers lacking BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Utilizing the concept of synthetic lethality has provided new opportunities for the development of targeted therapies, by allowing the targeting of loss of function genetic aberrations. In cancer cells with BRCA1 or BRCA2 loss of function, which harbor deficiency of DNA repair by homologous recombination, inhibition of PARP1 enzymatic activity leads to an accumulation of single strand breaks that are converted to double strand breaks but cannot be repaired by homologous recombination. Inhibition of PARP has therefore been advanced as a novel targeted therapy for cancers harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Preclinical and preliminary clinical evidence, however, suggests a potentially broader scope for PARP inhibitors. Loss of function of various proteins involved in double strand break repair other than BRCA1/2 has been suggested to be synthetically lethal with PARP inhibition. Inactivation of these genes has been reported in a subset of human cancers and might therefore constitute predictive biomarkers for PARP inhibition. Here we discuss the evidence that the clinical use of PARP inhibition may be broader than targeting of cancers in BRCA1/2 germ-line mutation carriers.Key words: homologous recombination, PARP inhibitor, BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, PALB2, EMSY, double strand break repair     

Unexpected gene activation following CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated genome editing

The discovery of the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and its development as a genome editing tool has revolutionized the field of molecular biology. In the DNA damage field, CRISPR has brought an alternative to induce endogenous double‐strand breaks (DSBs) at desired genomic locations and study the DNA damage response and its consequences. Many systems for sgRNA delivery have been reported in order to efficiently generate this DSB, including lentiviral vectors. However, some of the consequences of these systems are not yet well understood. Here, we report that lentiviral‐based sgRNA vectors can integrate into the endogenous genomic target location, leading to undesired activation of the target gene. By generating a DSB in the regulatory region of the ABCB1 gene using a lentiviral sgRNA vector, we can induce the formation of Taxol‐resistant colonies. We show that these colonies upregulate ABCB1 via integration of the EEF1A1 and the U6 promoters from the sgRNA vector. We believe that this is an unreported CRISPR/Cas9 on‐target effect that researchers need to be aware of when using lentiviral vectors for genome editing.     

Studying the mechanism of sperm DNA damage caused by folate deficiency

Sperm DNA injury is one of the common causes of male infertility. Folic acid deficiency would increase the methylation level of the important genes, including those involved in DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair pathway. In the early stages, we analysed the correlation between seminal plasma folic acid concentration and semen parameters in 157 infertility patients and 91 sperm donor volunteers, and found that there was a significant negative correlation between seminal folic acid concentration and sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI; r = −0.495, p < 0.01). Then through reduced representation bisulphite sequencing, global DNA methylation of sperm of patients in the low folic acid group and the high folic acid group was analysed, it was found that the methylation level in Rad54 promoter region increased in the folic acid deficiency group compared with the normal folic acid group. Meanwhile, the results of animal model and spermatocyte line (GC‐2) also found that folic acid deficiency can increase the methylation level in Rad54 promoter region, increased sperm DFI in mice, increased the expression of γ‐H2AX, that is, DNA injury marker protein, and increased sensitivity of GC‐2 to external damage and stimulation. The study indicates that the expression of Rad54 is downregulated by folic acid deficiency via DNA methylation. This may be one of the mechanisms of sperm DNA damage caused by folate deficiency.     

Cancer-Associated Mutations in BRC Domains of BRCA2 Affect Homologous Recombination Induced by Rad51

The tumor suppressor BRCA2 protein plays a major role in the regulation of Rad51-catalyzed homologous recombination. BRCA2 interacts with monomeric Rad51 primarily via conserved BRC domains and coordinates the formation of Rad51 filaments at double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) breaks. A number of cancer-associated mutations in BRC4 and BRC2 domains have been reported. To elucidate their effects on homologous recombination, we studied Rad51 filament formation on single-stranded DNA and dsDNA substrates and Rad51-catalyzed strand exchange, in the presence of wild-type and mutated peptides of either BRC4 or BRC2. While the wild-type BRC2 and BRC4 peptides inhibited filament formation and, thus, strand exchange, the mutated forms decreased significantly these inhibitory effects. These results are consistent with a three-dimensional model for the interface between individual BRC repeats and Rad51. We suggest that mutations at sites crucial for the association between Rad51 and BRC domains impair the ability of BRCA2 to recruit Rad51 to dsDNA breaks, hampering recombinational repair.     

The repair of G-quadruplex-induced DNA damage

G4 DNA motifs, which can form stable secondary structures called G-quadruplexes, are ubiquitous in eukaryotic genomes, and have been shown to cause genomic instability. Specialized helicases that unwind G-quadruplexes in vitro have been identified, and they have been shown to prevent genetic instability in vivo. In the absence of these helicases, G-quadruplexes can persist and cause replication fork stalling and collapse. Translesion synthesis (TLS) and homologous recombination (HR) have been proposed to play a role in the repair of this damage, but recently it was found in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that G4-induced genome alterations are generated by an error-prone repair mechanism that is dependent on the A-family polymerase Theta (Pol θ). Current data point towards a scenario where DNA replication blocked at G-quadruplexes causes DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), and where the choice of repair pathway that can act on these breaks dictates the nature of genomic alterations that are observed in various organisms.     

The structural and biochemical characterization of human RNase H2 complex reveals the molecular basis for substrate recognition and Aicardi-Goutières syndrome defects

RNase H2 cleaves RNA sequences that are part of RNA/DNA hybrids or that are incorporated into DNA, thus, preventing genomic instability and the accumulation of aberrant nucleic acid, which in humans induces Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, a severe autoimmune disorder. The 3.1 Å crystal structure of human RNase H2 presented here allowed us to map the positions of all 29 mutations found in Aicardi-Goutières syndrome patients, several of which were not visible in the previously reported mouse RNase H2. We propose the possible effects of these mutations on the protein stability and function. Bacterial and eukaryotic RNases H2 differ in composition and substrate specificity. Bacterial RNases H2 are monomeric proteins and homologs of the eukaryotic RNases H2 catalytic subunit, which in addition possesses two accessory proteins. The eukaryotic RNase H2 heterotrimeric complex recognizes RNA/DNA hybrids and (5′)RNA-DNA(3′)/DNA junction hybrids as substrates with similar efficiency, whereas bacterial RNases H2 are highly specialized in the recognition of the (5′)RNA-DNA(3′) junction and very poorly cleave RNA/DNA hybrids in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions. Using the crystal structure of the Thermotoga maritima RNase H2-substrate complex, we modeled the human RNase H2-substrate complex and verified the model by mutational analysis. Our model indicates that the difference in substrate preference stems from the different position of the crucial tyrosine residue involved in substrate binding and recognition.