A yeast-based assay identifies drugs that interfere with immune evasion of the Epstein-Barr virus

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is tightly associated with certain human cancers, but there is as yet no specific treatment against EBV-related diseases. The EBV-encoded EBNA1 protein is essential to maintain viral episomes and for viral persistence. As such, EBNA1 is expressed in all EBV-infected cells, and is highly antigenic. All infected individuals, including individuals with cancer, have CD8⁺ T cells directed towards EBNA1 epitopes, yet the immune system fails to detect and destroy cells harboring the virus. EBV immune evasion depends on the capacity of the Gly-Ala repeat (GAr) domain of EBNA1 to inhibit the translation of its own mRNA in cis, thereby limiting the production of EBNA1-derived antigenic peptides presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I pathway. Here we establish a yeast-based assay for monitoring GAr-dependent inhibition of translation. Using this assay we identify doxorubicin (DXR) as a compound that specifically interferes with the GAr effect on translation in yeast. DXR targets the topoisomerase-II–DNA complexes and thereby causes genomic damage. We show, however, that the genotoxic effect of DXR and various analogs thereof is uncoupled from the effect on GAr-mediated translation control. This is further supported by the observation that etoposide and teniposide, representing another class of topoisomerase-II–DNA targeting drugs, have no effect on GAr-mediated translation control. DXR and active analogs stimulate, in a GAr-dependent manner, EBNA1 expression in mammalian cells and overcome GAr-dependent restriction of MHC class I antigen presentation. These results validate our approach as an effective high-throughput screening assay to identify drugs that interfere with EBV immune evasion and, thus, constitute candidates for treating EBV-related diseases, in particular EBV-associated cancers.KEY WORDS: EBV-associated cancers, Cell-based drug screening, EBNA1 GAr domain, Yeast-based models, Immune evasion, Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin, 5-fluorouracil     

Inhibition of antigen presentation by the glycine/alanine repeat domain is not conserved in simian homologues of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1.

Most humans and Old World nonhuman primates are infected for life with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or closely related gammaherpesviruses in the same lymphocryptovirus (LCV) subgroup. Several potential strategies for immune evasion and persistence have been proposed based on studies of EBV infection in humans, but it has been difficult to test their actual contribution experimentally. Interest has focused on the EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) because of its essential role in the maintenance and replication of the episomal viral genome in latently infected cells and because EBNA1 endogenously expressed in these cells is protected from presentation to the major histocompatibility complex class-I restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response through the action of an internal glycine-alanine repeat (GAR). Given the high degree of biologic conservation among LCVs which infect humans and Old World primates, we hypothesized that strategies essential for viral persistence would be well conserved among viruses of this subgroup. We show that the rhesus LCV EBNA1 shares sequence homology with the EBV and baboon LCV EBNA1 and that the rhesus LCV EBNA1 is a functional homologue for EBV EBNA1-dependent plasmid maintenance and replication. Interestingly, all three LCVs possess a GAR domain, but the baboon and rhesus LCV EBNA1 GARs fail to inhibit antigen processing and presentation as determined by using three different in vitro CTL assays. These studies suggest that inhibition of antigen processing and presentation by the EBNA1 GAR may not be an essential mechanism for persistent infection by all LCV and that other mechanisms may be important for immune evasion during LCV infection.     

The nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) controls translation initiation in cis by recruiting nucleolin to the encoding mRNA

Protein aggregates and abnormal proteins are toxic and associated with neurodegenerative diseases. There are several mechanisms to help cells get rid of aggregates but little is known on how cells prevent aggregate-prone proteins from being synthesised. The EBNA1 of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) evades the immune system by suppressing its own mRNA translation initiation in order to minimize the production of antigenic peptides for the major histocompatibility (MHC) class I pathway. Here we show that the emerging peptide of the disordered glycine–alanine repeat (GAr) within EBNA1 dislodges the nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) from the ribosome. This results in the recruitment of nucleolin to the GAr-encoding mRNA and suppression of mRNA translation initiation in cis. Suppressing NAC alpha (NACA) expression prevents nucleolin from binding to the GAr mRNA and overcomes GAr-mediated translation inhibition. Taken together, these observations suggest that EBNA1 exploits a nascent protein quality control pathway to regulate its own rate of synthesis that is based on sensing the nascent GAr peptide by NAC followed by the recruitment of nucleolin to the GAr-encoding RNA sequence.     

Role for Btg1 and Btg2 in growth arrest of WEHI-231 cells through arginine methylation following membrane immunoglobulin engagement

Engagement of membrane Ig (mIg) on WEHI-231 murine B lymphoma cells, a cell line model representative of primary immature B cells, results in growth arrest and subsequent apoptosis. Of the several dozen genes upregulated greater than two-fold by anti-IgM treatment through DNA microarray analysis, we focused on B cell translocation gene 1 (Btg1) and Btg2, member of Btg/Tob family of proteins. WEHI-231 cells were infected with the Btg1/EGFP or Btg2/EGFP retroviral vectors, and those expressing either Btg1 or Btg2 accumulated in G1 phase at significantly higher proportions than that seen for cells expressing control vector. Btg1 or Btg2 bound to protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) 1 via the box C region, an interaction required for anti-IgM-induced growth inhibition. The arginine methyltransferase inhibitor AdOx partially abrogated growth inhibition induced by Btg1, Btg2, or anti-IgM. The Btg1- or Btg2-induced growth inhibition was also abrogated in PRMT1-deficient cells via introduction of small interference RNA. In addition, we observed anti-IgM-induced arginine methylation of two proteins, a 28-kDa and a 36-kDa protein. Methylation, detected by a monoclonal antibody specific for asymmetric, but not symmetric methyl residues, was observed as early as 1 h-2 h after stimulation and was sustained for up to 24 h. The anti-IgM-induced p36 arginine methylation was abrogated in the PRMT1-deficient cells, suggesting that PRMT1 induces p36 methylation. Together, these results suggest that anti-IgM-induced growth inhibition is mediated via upregulation of Btg1 and Btg2, resulting in the activation of arginine methyltransferase activity and culminating in growth inhibition of WEHI-231 cells.     

Arginine methylation of the cellular nucleic acid binding protein does not affect its subcellular localization but impedes RNA binding

Cellular nucleic acid binding protein (CNBP) contains seven zinc finger (ZF) repeats and an arginine and glycine (RG) rich sequence between the first and the second ZF. CNBP interacts with protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT1. Full-length but not RG-deleted or mutated CNBP can be methylated. Treatment with a methylation inhibitor AdOx reduced CNBP methylation, but did not affect the concentrated nuclear localization of CNBP. Nevertheless, arginine methylation of CNBP appeared to interfere with its RNA binding activity. Our findings show that arginine methylation of CNBP in the RG motif did not change the subcellular localization, but regulated its RNA binding activity.Structured summary of protein interactionsPRMT1 binds to CNBP by pull down (View interaction)PRMT1 methylates CNBP by enzymatic study (View interaction)CNBP physically interacts with PRMT1 by anti tag coimmunoprecipitation (View interaction)     

Arginine methylation of SARS-Cov-2 nucleocapsid protein regulates RNA binding,its ability to suppress stress granule formation,and viral replication

Viral proteins are known to be methylated by host protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) necessary for the viral life cycle, but it remains unknown whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) proteins are methylated. Herein, we show that PRMT1 methylates SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein at residues R95 and R177 within RGG/RG motifs, preferred PRMT target sequences. We confirmed arginine methylation of N protein by immunoblotting viral proteins extracted from SARS-CoV-2 virions isolated from cell culture. Type I PRMT inhibitor (MS023) or substitution of R95 or R177 with lysine inhibited interaction of N protein with the 5’-UTR of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA, a property required for viral packaging. We also defined the N protein interactome in HEK293 cells, which identified PRMT1 and many of its RGG/RG substrates, including the known interacting protein G3BP1 as well as other components of stress granules (SGs), which are part of the host antiviral response. Methylation of R95 regulated the ability of N protein to suppress the formation of SGs, as R95K substitution or MS023 treatment blocked N-mediated suppression of SGs. Also, the coexpression of methylarginine reader Tudor domain-containing protein 3 quenched N protein–mediated suppression of SGs in a dose-dependent manner. Finally, pretreatment of VeroE6 cells with MS023 significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 replication. Because type I PRMT inhibitors are already undergoing clinical trials for cancer treatment, inhibiting arginine methylation to target the later stages of the viral life cycle such as viral genome packaging and assembly of virions may represent an additional therapeutic application of these drugs.     

Interaction between Basic Residues of Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA1 Protein and Cellular Chromatin Mediates Viral Plasmid Maintenance

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome is episomally maintained in latently infected cells. The viral protein EBNA1 is a bridging molecule that tethers EBV episomes to host mitotic chromosomes as well as to interphase chromatin. EBNA1 localizes to cellular chromosomes (chromatin) via its chromosome binding domains (CBDs), which are rich in glycine and arginine residues. However, the molecular mechanism by which the CBDs of EBNA1 attach to cellular chromatin is still under debate. Mutation analyses revealed that stepwise substitution of arginine residues within the CBD1 (amino acids 40–54) and CBD2 (amino acids 328–377) regions with alanines progressively impaired chromosome binding activity of EBNA1. The complete arginine-to-alanine substitutions within the CBD1 and -2 regions abolished the ability of EBNA1 to stably maintain EBV-derived oriP plasmids in dividing cells. Importantly, replacing the same arginines with lysines had minimal effect, if any, on chromosome binding of EBNA1 as well as on its ability to stably maintain oriP plasmids. Furthermore, a glycine-arginine-rich peptide derived from the CBD1 region bound to reconstituted nucleosome core particles in vitro, as did a glycine-lysine rich peptide, whereas a glycine-alanine rich peptide did not. These results support the idea that the chromosome binding of EBNA1 is mediated by electrostatic interactions between the basic amino acids within the CBDs and negatively charged cellular chromatin.     

Histone H2A and H4 N-terminal Tails Are Positioned by the MEP50 WD Repeat Protein for Efficient Methylation by the PRMT5 Arginine Methyltransferase

The protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 is complexed with the WD repeat protein MEP50 (also known as Wdr77 or androgen coactivator p44) in vertebrates in a tetramer of heterodimers. MEP50 is hypothesized to be required for protein substrate recruitment to the catalytic domain of PRMT5. Here we demonstrate that the cross-dimer MEP50 is paired with its cognate PRMT5 molecule to promote histone methylation. We employed qualitative methylation assays and a novel ultrasensitive continuous assay to measure enzyme kinetics. We demonstrate that neither full-length human PRMT5 nor the Xenopus laevis PRMT5 catalytic domain has appreciable protein methyltransferase activity. We show that histones H4 and H3 bind PRMT5-MEP50 more efficiently compared with histone H2A(1–20) and H4(1–20) peptides. Histone binding is mediated through histone fold interactions as determined by competition experiments and by high density histone peptide array interaction studies. Nucleosomes are not a substrate for PRMT5-MEP50, consistent with the primary mode of interaction via the histone fold of H3-H4, obscured by DNA in the nucleosome. Mutation of a conserved arginine (Arg-42) on the MEP50 insertion loop impaired the PRMT5-MEP50 enzymatic efficiency by increasing its histone substrate K_m, comparable with that of Caenorhabditis elegans PRMT5. We show that PRMT5-MEP50 prefers unmethylated substrates, consistent with a distributive model for dimethylation and suggesting discrete biological roles for mono- and dimethylarginine-modified proteins. We propose a model in which MEP50 and PRMT5 simultaneously engage the protein substrate, orienting its targeted arginine to the catalytic site.     

A protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) and 2 heteromeric interaction increases PRMT1 enzymatic activity

Protein arginine N-methyltransferases (PRMTs) act in signaling pathways and gene expression by methylating arginine residues within target proteins. PRMT1 is responsible for most cellular arginine methylation activity and can work independently or in collaboration with other PRMTs. In this study, we demonstrate a direct interaction between PRMT1 and PRMT2 using co-immunoprecipitation, bimolecular fluorescence complementation, and enzymatic assays. As a result of this interaction, PRMT2 stimulated PRMT1 activity, affecting its apparent V(max) and K(M) values in vitro and increasing the production of methylarginines in cells. Active site mutations and regional deletions from PRMT1 and -2 were also investigated, which demonstrated that complex formation required full-length, active PRMT1. Although the inhibition of methylation by adenosine dialdehyde prevented the interaction between PRMT1 and -2, it did not prevent the interaction between PRMT1 and a truncation mutant of PRMT2 lacking its Src homology 3 (SH3) domain. This result suggests that the SH3 domain may mediate an interaction between PRMT1 and -2 in a methylation-dependent fashion. On the basis of our findings, we propose that PRMT1 serves as the major methyltransferase in cells by forming higher-order oligomers with itself, PRMT2, and possibly other PRMTs.     

The role of protein arginine-methyltransferase 1 in gliomagenesis

Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1), a type-I arginine methyltransferase, has been implicated in diverse cellular events. We have focused on the role of PRMT1 in gliomagenesis. In this study, we showed that PRMT1 expression was up-regulated in glioma tissues and cell lines compared with normal brain tissues. The knock-down of PRMT1 resulted in an arrest in the G1-S phase of the cell cycle, proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction in four glioma cell lines (T98G, U87MG, U251, and A172). Moreover, an in vivo study confirmed that the tumor growth in nude mouse xenografts was significantly decreased in the RNAi-PRMT1 group. Additionally, we found that the level of the asymmetric dimethylated modification of H4R3, a substrate of PRMT1, was higher in glioma cells than in normal brain tissues and decreased after PRMT1 knock-down. Our data suggest a potential role for PRMT1 as a novel biomarker of and therapeutic target in gliomas. [BMB Reports 2012; 45(8): 470-475].     

Conjugates of adenosine mimetics and arginine-rich peptides serve as inhibitors and fluorescent probes but not as long-lifetime photoluminescent probes for protein arginine methyltransferases

The conjugates of an adenosine mimetic and oligo-l -arginine or oligo-d -arginine (ARCs) were initially designed in our research group as inhibitors and photoluminescent probes targeting basophilic protein kinases. Here, we explored a panel of ARCs and their fluorescent derivatives in biochemical assays with members of the protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) family, focusing specifically on PRMT1. In the binding/displacement assay with detection of fluorescence anisotropy, we found that ARCs and arginine-rich peptides could serve as high-affinity ligands for PRMT1, whereas the equilibrium dissociation constant values depended dramatically on the number of arginine residues within the compounds. The fluorescently labeled probe ARC-1081 was displaced from its complex with PRMT1 by both S-adenosyl-l -methionine (SAM) and S-adenosyl-l -homocysteine (SAH), indicating binding of the adenosine mimetic of ARCs to the SAM/SAH-binding site within PRMT1. The ARCs that had previously shown microsecond-lifetime photoluminescence in complex with protein kinases did not feature such property in complex with PRMT1, demonstrating the selectivity of the time-resolved readout format. When tested against a panel of PRMT family members in single-dose inhibition experiments, a micromolar concentration of ARC-902 was required for the inhibition of PRMT1 and PRMT7. Overall, our results suggest that the compounds containing multiple arginine residues (including the well-known cell-penetrating peptides) are likely to inhibit PRMT and thus interfere with the epigenetic modification status in complex biological systems, which should be taken into consideration during interpretation of the experimental data.