The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome

Specific interactions of the genome with the nuclear lamina (NL) are thought to assist chromosome folding inside the nucleus and to contribute to the regulation of gene expression. High-resolution mapping has recently identified hundreds of large, sharply defined lamina-associated domains (LADs) in the human genome, and suggested that the insulator protein CTCF may help to demarcate these domains. Here, we report the detailed structure of LADs in Drosophila cells, and investigate the putative roles of five insulator proteins in LAD organization. We found that the Drosophila genome is also organized in discrete LADs, which are about five times smaller than human LADs but contain on average a similar number of genes. Systematic comparison to new and published insulator binding maps shows that only SU(HW) binds preferentially at LAD borders and at specific positions inside LADs, while GAF, CTCF, BEAF-32 and DWG are mostly absent from these regions. By knockdown and overexpression studies we demonstrate that SU(HW) weakens genome - NL interactions through a local antagonistic effect, but we did not obtain evidence that it is essential for border formation. Our results provide insights into the evolution of LAD organization and identify SU(HW) as a fine-tuner of genome - NL interactions.     

Identification of lamin B–regulated chromatin regions based on chromatin landscapes

Lamins, the major structural components of the nuclear lamina (NL) found beneath the nuclear envelope, are known to interact with most of the nuclear peripheral chromatin in metazoan cells. Although NL–chromatin associations correlate with a repressive chromatin state, the role of lamins in tethering chromatin to NL and how such tether influences gene expression have remained challenging to decipher. Studies suggest that NL proteins regulate chromatin in a context-dependent manner. Therefore understanding the context of chromatin states based on genomic features, including chromatin–NL interactions, is important to the study of lamins and other NL proteins. By modeling genome organization based on combinatorial patterns of chromatin association with lamin B1, core histone modification, and core and linker histone occupancy, we report six distinct large chromatin landscapes, referred to as histone lamin landscapes (HiLands)-red (R), -orange (O), -yellow (Y), -green (G), -blue (B), and -purple (P), in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). This HiLands model demarcates the previously mapped lamin-associated chromatin domains (LADs) into two HiLands, HiLands-B and HiLands-P, which are similar to facultative and constitutive heterochromatins, respectively. Deletion of B-type lamins in mESCs caused a reduced interaction between regions of HiLands-B and NL as measured by emerin–chromatin interaction. Our findings reveal the importance of analyzing specific chromatin types when studying the function of NL proteins in chromatin tether and regulation.     

Initiation of DNA replication at a nuclear matrix-attached chromatin fraction

It is still unclear what nuclear components support initiation of DNA replication. To address this issue, we developed a cell-free replication system in which the nuclear matrix along with the residual matrix-attached chromatin was used as a substrate for DNA replication. We found out that initiation occurred at late G1 residual chromatin but not at early G1 chromatin and depended on cytosolic and nuclear factors present in S phase cells but not in G1 cells. Initiation of DNA replication occurred at discrete replication foci in a pattern typical for early S phase. To prove that the observed initiation takes place at legitimate DNA replication origins, the in vitro synthesized nascent DNA strands were isolated and analyzed. It was shown that they were enriched in sequences from the core origin region of the early firing, dihydrofolate reductase origin of replication ori-beta and not in distal to the origin sequences. A conclusion is drawn that initiation of DNA replication occurs at discrete sub-chromosomal structures attached to the nuclear matrix.     

Close to the edge: Heterochromatin at the nucleolar and nuclear peripheries

Chromatin is a dynamic structure composed of DNA, RNA, and proteins, regulating storage and expression of the genetic material in the nucleus. Heterochromatin plays a crucial role in driving the three-dimensional arrangement of the interphase genome, and in preserving genome stability by maintaining a subset of the genome in a silent state. Spatial genome organization contributes to normal patterns of gene function and expression, and is therefore of broad interest. Mammalian heterochromatin, the focus of this review, mainly localizes at the nuclear periphery, forming Lamina-associated domains (LADs), and at the nucleolar periphery, forming Nucleolus-associated domains (NADs). Together, these regions comprise approximately one-half of mammalian genomes, and most but not all loci within these domains are stochastically placed at either of these two locations after exit from mitosis at each cell cycle. Excitement about the role of these heterochromatic domains in early development has recently been heightened by the discovery that LADs appear at some loci in the preimplantation mouse embryo prior to other chromosomal features like compartmental identity and topologically-associated domains (TADs). While LADs have been extensively studied and mapped during cellular differentiation and early embryonic development, NADs have been less thoroughly studied. Here, we summarize pioneering studies of NADs and LADs, more recent advances in our understanding of cis/trans-acting factors that mediate these localizations, and discuss the functional significance of these associations.     

Comparison of the subunit organization of early and late replicating chromatin

A comparison was made of the subunit organization of chromatin from regions of the genome with different metaphase chromosome banding characteristics by analyzing the accessibility of early and late replicating DNA in synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells to digestion with staphylococcal nuclease. Three measures of nuclease susceptibility were employed: (1) the release of acid-soluble material; (2) a digestion index, P, which corresponds to the proportion of internucleosome segments which experienced at least one cleavage event; and (3) the size distribution of DNA fragments isolated from digested chromatin. Little or no difference was observed in the initial rates with which nuclease converted early and late replicating chromatin to acid-soluble material, although the initial digestion rates varied with time of cell collection in the cycle (metaphase > G1 mid-S > late-S or G2). Measurements of the digestion indices of material isolated from interphase cells suggested that initial cleavage events were more rapid in early replicating chromatin than in late replicating chromatin. In contrast, electrophoretic analysis revealed that oligomer DNA fragments from early labelled metaphase chromatin were slightly larger than corresponding fragments from late labelled metaphase chromatin. The size distribution of DNA in submonomer fragments obtained from extensively digested chromatin appeared to be identical regardless of the timing of replication or cell collection. Those small differences in chromatin digestibility that were observed may reflect subtle variations in the accessibility of internucleosome regions or perhaps in the higher-order arrangement of nucleosomes. However, no gross variation in accessibility to staphylococcal nuclease digestion was observed in chromatin localized to metaphase chromosome regions with vastly different cytological staining properties.     

Non-farnesylated B-type lamin can tether chromatin inside the nucleus and its chromatin interaction requires the Ig-fold region

Lamins are thought to direct heterochromatin to the nuclear lamina (NL); however, this function of lamin has not been clearly demonstrated in vivo. To address this, we analyzed polytene chromosome morphology when artificial lamin variants were expressed in Drosophila endoreplicating cells. We found that the CaaX-motif-deleted B-type lamin Dm₀, but not A-type lamin C, was able to form a nuclear envelope-independent layer that was closely associated with chromatin. Other nuclear envelope proteins were not detected in this “ectopic lamina,” and the associated chromatin showed a repressive histone modification maker but not a permissive histone modification marker nor RNA polymerase II proteins. Furthermore, deletion of the C-terminal lamin-Ig-fold domain prevents chromatin association with this ectopic lamina. Thus, non-farnesylated B-type lamin Dm₀ can form an ectopic lamina and induce changes to chromatin structure and status inside the interphase nucleus.     

Directed targeting of chromatin to the nuclear lamina is mediated by chromatin state and A-type lamins

Nuclear organization has been implicated in regulating gene activity. Recently, large developmentally regulated regions of the genome dynamically associated with the nuclear lamina have been identified. However, little is known about how these lamina-associated domains (LADs) are directed to the nuclear lamina. We use our tagged chromosomal insertion site system to identify small sequences from borders of fibroblast-specific variable LADs that are sufficient to target these ectopic sites to the nuclear periphery. We identify YY1 (Ying-Yang1) binding sites as enriched in relocating sequences. Knockdown of YY1 or lamin A/C, but not lamin A, led to a loss of lamina association. In addition, targeted recruitment of YY1 proteins facilitated ectopic LAD formation dependent on histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation and histone H3 lysine di- and trimethylation. Our results also reveal that endogenous loci appear to be dependent on lamin A/C, YY1, H3K27me3, and H3K9me2/3 for maintenance of lamina-proximal positioning.     

Higher order chromatin structure at the X-inactivation center via looping DNA

In mammals, the silencing step of the X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) process is initiated by the non-coding Xist RNA. Xist is known to be controlled by the non-coding Xite and Tsix loci, but the mechanisms by which Tsix and Xite regulate Xist are yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we examine the role of higher order chromatin structure across the 100-kb region of the mouse X-inactivation center (Xic) and map domains of specialized chromatin in vivo. By hypersensitive site mapping and chromosome conformation capture (3C), we identify two domains of higher order chromatin structure. Xite makes looping interactions with Tsix, while Xist makes contacts with Jpx/Enox, another non-coding gene not previously implicated in XCI. These regions interact in a developmentally-specific and sex-specific manner that is consistent with a regulatory role in XCI. We propose that dynamic changes in three-dimensional architecture leads to formation of separate chromatin hubs in Tsix and Xist that together regulate the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation.     

Sequences of DNA fragments contacting the nuclear lamina in vivo.

To study the DNA sequences contacting the nuclear lamina (NL) in vivo, Ehrlich ascites tumor cells were UV-irradiated. The NL was purified, and the DNA fragments covalently linked to the lamina proteins in vivo were cloned and sequenced. Although heterogeneous in length and composition, the sequences displayed homology to the introns and/or flanking regions of different genes, suggesting that functionally distinct regions are organized in a topologically defined manner at the nuclear periphery.     

Phosphorylation-dependent mitotic SUMOylation drives nuclear envelope–chromatin interactions

In eukaryotes, chromatin binding to the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) contributes to spatial organization of the genome and epigenetic programs important for gene expression. In mitosis, chromatin–nuclear envelope (NE) interactions are lost and then formed again as sister chromosomes segregate to postmitotic nuclei. Investigating these processes in S. cerevisiae, we identified temporally and spatially controlled phosphorylation-dependent SUMOylation events that positively regulate postmetaphase chromatin association with the NE. Our work establishes a phosphorylation-mediated targeting mechanism of the SUMO ligase Siz2 to the INM during mitosis, where Siz2 binds to and SUMOylates the VAP protein Scs2. The recruitment of Siz2 through Scs2 is further responsible for a wave of SUMOylation along the INM that supports the assembly and anchorage of subtelomeric chromatin at the INM and localization of an active gene (INO1) to NPCs during the later stages of mitosis and into G1-phase.     

The nuclear DNA content and chromatin ultrastructure of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae

By measurement of 731 erythrocytes by Feulgen cytophotometry, the nuclear DNA content of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae Smith is determined to be 7.22 picograms (pg). This value is high among fishes but is closely comparable to that of man and most other mammals. The average mass of erythrocyte nuclear chromatin, measured by quantitative electron microscopy, is 15.2 pg. This chromatin is in the form of fibers having a mean diameter of 202 Å. The average weight of the chromatin fiber is 6.75 × 10^?16 g/μm. Thus, the nucleus contains 22 500 μm of chromatin fiber. Dividing the nuclear DNA content of Latimeria by the known mass of the DNA double helix (3.26 × 10^?18 g/μm) gives a total length of 2 215 000 μm of DNA double helix. In comparing these two measurements of structural length, it is found that 98.4 lengths of double helix are packed into one length of chromatin fiber. This packing ratio is over three times greater than that of human G1 lymphocytes. The difference may be attributable to the difference between the two tissues and thus reflect a functional distinction, or it may be due to the difference between the two species and reflect an evolutionary distinction.     

G2 phase chromatin lacks determinants of replication timing

DNA replication in all eukaryotes follows a defined replication timing program, the molecular mechanism of which remains elusive. Using a Xenopus laevis egg extract replication system, we previously demonstrated that replication timing is established during early G1 phase of the cell cycle (timing decision point [TDP]), which is coincident with the repositioning and anchorage of chromatin in the newly formed nucleus. In this study, we use this same system to show that G2 phase chromatin lacks determinants of replication timing but maintains the overall spatial organization of chromatin domains, and we confirm this finding by genome-wide analysis of rereplication in vivo. In contrast, chromatin from quiescent cells retains replication timing but exhibits disrupted spatial organization. These data support a model in which events at the TDP, facilitated by chromatin spatial organization, establish determinants of replication timing that persist independent of spatial organization until the process of chromatin replication during S phase erases those determinants.