Arabidopsis thaliana telomeres exhibit euchromatic features

Telomere function is influenced by chromatin structure and organization, which usually involves epigenetic modifications. We describe here the chromatin structure of Arabidopsis thaliana telomeres. Based on the study of six different epigenetic marks we show that Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. In contrast, subtelomeric regions and telomeric sequences present at interstitial chromosomal loci are heterochromatic. Histone methyltransferases and the chromatin remodeling protein DDM1 control subtelomeric heterochromatin formation. Whereas histone methyltransferases are required for histone H3K9(2Me) and non-CpG DNA methylation, DDM1 directs CpG methylation but not H3K9(2Me) or non-CpG methylation. These results argue that both kinds of proteins participate in different pathways to reinforce subtelomeric heterochromatin formation.     

Organization of telomeric and subtelomeric chromatin in the higher plant Nicotiana tabacum

We have examined the structure and chromatin organization of telomeres in Nicotiana tabacum. In tobacco the blocks of simple telomeric repeats (TTTAGGG)_n are many times larger than in other plants, e.g., Arabidopsis thatiana or tomato. They are resolved as multiple fragments 60–160 kb in size (in most cases 90–130 kb) on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of restriction endonuclease-digested DNA. The major subtelomeric repeat of the HRS60 family forms large homogeneous blocks of a basic 180 by motif having comparable lengths. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) cleaves tobacco telomeric chromatin into subunits with a short repeat length of 157±5 bp; the subtelomeric heterochromatin characterized by tandemly repeated sequences of the HRS60 family is cut by MNase with a 180 by periodicity. The monomeric and dimeric particles of telomeric and subtelomeric chromatin differ in sensitivity to MNase treatment: the telomeric particles are readily digested, producing ladders with a periodicity of 7 bp, while the subtelomeric particles appear to be rather resistant to intranucleosomal cleavage. The results presented show apparent similarities in the organization of telomeric chromatin in higher plants and mammals.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.Key words: telomeres, subtelomeres, euchromatin, heterochromatin, ChIP, immunolocalizationTelomeric DNA usually contains tandem repeats of a short GC rich motif. The number of repeats and, therefore, the length of telomeres is subject to regulation and influences relevant biological processes like aging and cancer.^1–3 In situ hybridization studies have revealed that telomeric repeats are also present at interstitial chromosomal loci.^4,5 An analysis of the genome sequence from different eukaryotes indicates that ITSs have a widespread distribution in different model systems including zebrafish, chicken, opossum, mouse, dog, cattle, horse, human, rice, poplar or Arabidopsis (see Fig. 1 for an example; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). These ITSs have been related to chromosomal aberrations, fragile sites, hot spots for recombination and diseases caused by genomic instability, although their functions remain unknown.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of the main telomeric repeat arrays in the genome of several model organisms. These representations have been performed by using the megaBLAST program and the all assemblies genomic databases at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). Searches for homology with 100 tandem telomeric repeats were done using the default parameters except that the expected threshold was set to 10 and the filters were turned off. Chromosomes are represented as vertical bars and numbered at the bottom. The horizontal bars represent the telomeric repeat arrays. Colors indicate the BLAST scores (red ≥200; pink 80–200; green 50–80).Telomeres and ITSs have probably cross talk through evolution. In some instances, ITSs could have been generated by telomeric fusions. Pioneering studies performed by Hermann J. Muller in Drosophila and Barbara McClintock in maize showed that newly formed chromosome ends tend to fuse giving rise to the so-called breakage-fusion-bridge cycle.^7,8 This cycle can lead to stable chromosomal reorganizations after healing of the broken ends. In addition, Muller and McClintock found that, unlike these newly formed broken chromosome ends, natural chromosomal ends are quite stable and do not tend to fuse.⁹ It is currently known that telomere dysfunction due to mutations that cause telomeric shortening or abolish the expression of certain telomeric proteins can lead to telomeric fusions, anaphase bridges and genome reorganizations.^1–3,10,11 Therefore, telomeric shortening or alterations of telomeric chromatin structure might be expected to generate ITSs through evolution by promoting telomeric fusions.¹² ITSs might also originate through the activity of telomerase during the repair process of double strand breaks or by recombination.^13–16 In addition, telomerase activity might lead to the formation of new telomeres by healing of chromosome breaks within internal telomeric repeats and even within other sequences.^17–19 This process of healing involves the acquisition of telomeric chromatin structure.DNA folds into two major chromatin organizations inside the cell nucleus: heterochromatin and euchromatin. Heterochromatin is highly condensed in interphase nuclei and is usually associated with repetitive and silent DNA. By contrast, euchromatin has an open conformation and is often related to the capacity to be transcribed. Both kinds of chromatin exhibit defined epigenetic modifications that influence their biochemical behavior. Thus, the study of these epigenetic marks is an issue of major interest.The chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs might be different. Therefore, they should be studied independently. Chromatin structure analyses are usually performed by immunocytolocalization or by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).^20–23 Special care should be taken when the epigenetic status of telomeres is analyzed by immunocytolocalization. This technique does not allow differentiating between telomeres and subtelomeric regions. Since subtelomeric regions are known to be heterochromatic in many eukaryotic organisms, heterochromatic marks should be immunolocalized at the chromosome ends of these organisms. However, these marks could correspond to subtelomeric regions and not to telomeres.The ChIP technique implies the immunoprecipitation of chromatin with specific antibodies and the further analysis of the immunoprecipitated DNA. DNA sequences immunoprecipitated by a specific antibody are thought to associate in vivo with the feature recognized by this antibody. Whereas the enrichment of single copy sequences in the immunoprecipitated DNA has been usually analyzed by quantitative PCR, the analyses of repetitive DNA sequences have been often performed by hybridization. Thus, multiple telomeric chromatin structure analyses have been performed by hybridizing immunoprecipitated DNA with a telomeric probe. However, these analyses displayed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs. High throughput sequencing analyses of the immunoprecipitated DNA might help overcome this problem. Nevertheless, since the reads obtained with these techniques at present are short, it is still difficult to ascertain whether the enrichment of immunoprecipitated telomeric sequences corresponds to telomeres or to ITSs. Third-generation long-read accurate technologies and new algorithms that discriminate between telomeres and ITSs should solve the problem.In principle, the combination of immunocytolocalization and ChIP experiments should help to differentiate between telomeres and ITSs. However, since subtelomeric regions are known to influence telomere function and contain degenerated ITSs, at least in some organisms like humans or Arabidopsis, this may not be necessarily true.⁶ A specific epigenetic mark might be required for telomere function, found associated with telomeric repeats by ChIP and with the end of chromosomes by immunocytolocalization and still not associate with true telomeres but with subtelomeric regions and ITSs or just with subtelomeric ITSs.An alternative way to analyze the chromatin structure of telomeres by ChIP involves the use of frequently cutting restriction enzymes. The chromatin structures of Arabidopsis telomeres and ITSs have been independently studied by using Tru9I, a restriction enzyme that recognizes the sequence TTAA.²⁴ Since telomeres in Arabidopsis and in other model systems are composed of perfect telomeric repeat arrays, they remain uncut after digestion with Tru9I.²⁵ In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs are frequently cut because they are composed of short arrays of perfect telomeric repeats interspersed with degenerated repeats.^25–28 Thus, when Arabidopsis genomic DNA is digested with Tru9I and hybridized with a telomeric probe, most of the signals corresponding to ITSs disappear.²⁵ The use of Tru9I has made possible to discover that Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs and subtelomeric regions are heterochromatic.²⁴ In Arabidopsis, heterochromatin is characterized by cytosine methylation, which can be targeted at CpG, CpNpG or CpNpN residues (where N is any nucleotide), and by H3K9me1,2, H3K27me1,2 and H4K20me1. In turn, Arabidopsis euchromatin is characterized by H3K4me1,2,3, H3K36me1,2,3, H4K20me2,3 and by histones acetylation.²⁹ ChIP experiments processed with Tru9I have revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres have high levels of euchromatic marks (H3K4me2, H3K9 and H4K16 acetylation) and low levels of heterochromatic marks (H3K9me2, H3K27me1 and DNA methylation).²⁴ Therefore, Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit epigenetic modifications characteristic of euchromatin.Different studies in mice, humans or Arabidopsis have reported that telomeres are heterochromatic based on the existence of siRNAs containing telomeric sequences, on the association of telomeric sequences with telomeric and with heterochromatin proteins, on the methylation of telomeric sequences or on the histones modifications associated with telomeric sequences.^30–34 However, the experiments presented in those studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin organizations of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. Telomeres have also been reported to be heterochromatic based on the existence of the so-called TElomeric Repeat containing RNAs (TERRA), which are present in different eukaryotes.³⁵ At telomeric regions, TERRA are transcribed from subtelomeric promoters towards chromosome ends. Since human subtelomeric TERRA are mostly composed of subtelomeric sequences, with only about 200 bp of telomeric sequences at their 3′ ends, they might be related to subtelomeric heterochromatin formation rather than to the formation of telomeric chromatin. Nevertheless, TERRA interact with human telomeric proteins and influence telomere function. In addition, TERRA might also be related to ITSs heterochromatinization.^34,35We believe that the scenario found in Arabidopsis could also be found in other model systems if the chromatin structures of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed. Several reports have described the presence of histone H3.3 at mice telomeres.^36–39 Since this histone variant has been previously associated with active chromatin, these studies are compatible with a euchromatic organization of telomeres. However, again in these reports, the experiments shown addressed simultaneously the chromatin organization of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. In general terms, we believe that a clear distinction between telomeres and ITSs should be established when future ChIP experiments are analyzed. The use of third generation high throughput sequencing technologies or of frequently cutting restriction enzymes might help in this task.As mentioned above, the epigenetic modifications associated with telomeric regions are known to be important for telomere function. These modifications are required to provide genome stability.³³ In this context, it will be relevant to ascertain how the function of Arabidopsis telomeres is influenced by their euchromatic marks and by the presence of heterochromatin at subtelomeric regions.     

DNA methyltransferases control telomere length and telomere recombination in mammalian cells

Here, we describe a role for mammalian DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in telomere length control. Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells genetically deficient for DNMT1, or both DNMT3a and DNMT3b have dramatically elongated telomeres compared with wild-type controls. Mammalian telomere repeats (TTAGGG) lack the canonical CpG methylation site. However, we demonstrate that mouse subtelomeric regions are heavily methylated, and that this modification is decreased in DNMT-deficient cells. We show that other heterochromatic marks, such as histone 3 Lys 9 (H3K9) and histone 4 Lys 20 (H4K20) trimethylation, remain at both subtelomeric and telomeric regions in these cells. Lack of DNMTs also resulted in increased telomeric recombination as indicated by sister-chromatid exchanges involving telomeric sequences, and by the presence of 'alternative lengthening of telomeres' (ALT)-associated promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) bodies (APBs). This increased telomeric recombination may lead to telomere-length changes, although our results do not exclude a potential involvement of telomerase and telomere-binding proteins in the aberrant telomere elongation observed in DNMT-deficient cells. Together, these results demonstrate a previously unappreciated role for DNA methylation in maintaining telomere integrity.     

Double telomeric signals on single chromatids revealed by FISH and PRINS

FISH probes for all human telomeres and specific telomeric probes that hybridize to unique sequences on individual chromosomes have been used to characterize the telomeric hybridization pattern of human peripheral blood lymphocytes and bone-marrow cells in interphase and metaphase chromosomes. We have identified the existence of double hybridization signals on chromatids both with the (TTAGGG)n telomere repeat arrays and on non chromosome-specific subtelomeric regions as well as on chromosome-specific sequences located several kilobases from the end of chromosomes. Preliminary results using cosmid or YAC probes that hybridize to regions rich in GC sequences also revealed double fluorescent spots on a single chromatid. Double spots were detected by PRINS on terminal and interstitial telomeric sequences in avian cells. The significance of this phenomenon is discussed based on some models of chromatid and DNA organization such as uninemy, looped chromatid organization and quartet DNA structures. The occurrence of double spots should be taken into consideration for the clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of duplications.     

Structure and variability of human chromosome ends.

Mammalian telomeres are thought to be composed of a tandem array of TTAGGG repeats. To further define the type and arrangement of sequences at the ends of human chromosomes, we developed a direct cloning strategy for telomere-associated DNA. The method involves a telomere enrichment procedure based on the relative lack of restriction endonuclease cutting sites near the ends of human chromosomes. Nineteen (TTAGGG)n-bearing plasmids were isolated, two of which contain additional human sequences proximal to the telomeric repeats. These telomere-flanking sequences detect BAL 31-sensitive loci and thus are located close to chromosome ends. One of the flanking regions is part of a subtelomeric repeat that is present at 10 to 25% of the chromosome ends in the human genome. This sequence is not conserved in rodent DNA and therefore should be a helpful tool for physical characterization of human chromosomes in human-rodent hybrid cell lines; some of the chromosomes that may be analyzed in this manner have been identified, i.e., 7, 16, 17, and 21. The minimal size of the subtelomeric repeat is 4 kilobases (kb); it shows a high frequency of restriction fragment length polymorphisms and undergoes extensive de novo methylation in somatic cells. Distal to the subtelomeric repeat, the chromosomes terminate in a long region (up to 14 kb) that may be entirely composed of TTAGGG repeats. This terminal segment is unusually variable. Although sperm telomeres are 10 to 14 kb long, telomeres in somatic cells are several kilobase pairs shorter and very heterogeneous in length. Additional telomere reduction occurs in primary tumors, indicating that somatic telomeres are unstable and may continuously lose sequences from their termini.     

The large-scale genomic organization of repetitive DNA families at the telomeres of rye chromosomes.

Repetitive DNA sequences in the terminal heterochromatin of rye (Secale cereale) chromosomes have consequences for the structural and functional organization of chromosomes. The large-scale genomic organization of these regions was studied using the telomeric repeat from Arabidopsis and clones of three nonhomologous, tandemly repeated, subtelomeric DNA families with complex but contrasting higher order structural organizations. Polymerase chain reaction analysis with a single primer showed a fraction of the repeat units of one family organized in a "head-to-head" orientation. Such structures suggest evolution of chromosomes by chromatid-type breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. In situ hybridization and pulse field gel electrophoresis showed the order of the repeats and the heterogeneity in the lengths of individual arrays. After Xbal digestion and pulse field gel electrophoresis, the telomeric and two subtelomeric clones showed strong hybridization signals from 40 to 100 kb, with a maximum at 50 to 60 kb. We suggest that these fragments define a basic higher order structure and DNA loop domains of regions of rye chromosomes consisting of arrays of tandemly organized sequences.     

Organization of telomeric and subtelomeric chromatin in the higher plant Nicotiana tabacum

We have examined the structure and chromatin organization of telomeres in Nicotiana tabacum. In tobacco the blocks of simple telomeric repeats (TTTAGGG)_n are many times larger than in other plants, e.g., Arabidopsis thatiana or tomato. They are resolved as multiple fragments 60–160 kb in size (in most cases 90–130 kb) on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of restriction endonuclease-digested DNA. The major subtelomeric repeat of the HRS60 family forms large homogeneous blocks of a basic 180 by motif having comparable lengths. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) cleaves tobacco telomeric chromatin into subunits with a short repeat length of 157±5 bp; the subtelomeric heterochromatin characterized by tandemly repeated sequences of the HRS60 family is cut by MNase with a 180 by periodicity. The monomeric and dimeric particles of telomeric and subtelomeric chromatin differ in sensitivity to MNase treatment: the telomeric particles are readily digested, producing ladders with a periodicity of 7 bp, while the subtelomeric particles appear to be rather resistant to intranucleosomal cleavage. The results presented show apparent similarities in the organization of telomeric chromatin in higher plants and mammals.     

Modulation of telomere length dynamics by the subtelomeric region of tetrahymena telomeres

Tetrahymena telomeres usually consist of approximately 250 base pairs of T(2)G(4) repeats, but they can grow to reach a new length set point of up to 900 base pairs when kept in log culture at 30 degrees C. We have examined the growth profile of individual macronuclear telomeres and have found that the rate and extent of telomere growth are affected by the subtelomeric region. When the sequence of the rDNA subtelomeric region was altered, we observed a decrease in telomere growth regardless of whether the GC content was increased or decreased. In both cases, the ordered structure of the subtelomeric chromatin was disrupted, but the effect on the telomeric complex was relatively minor. Examination of the telomeres from non-rDNA chromosomes showed that each telomere exhibited a unique and characteristic growth profile. The subtelomeric regions from individual chromosome ends did not share common sequence elements, and they each had a different chromatin structure. Thus, telomere growth is likely to be regulated by the organization of the subtelomeric chromatin rather than by a specific DNA element. Our findings suggest that at each telomere the telomeric complex and subtelomeric chromatin cooperate to form a unique higher order chromatin structure that controls telomere length.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.     

Compromised telomere maintenance in hypomethylated Arabidopsis thaliana plants

Telomeres, nucleoprotein structures at the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes, are important for the maintenance of genomic stability. Telomeres were considered as typical heterochromatic regions, but in light of recent results, this view should be reconsidered. Asymmetrically located cytosines in plant telomeric DNA repeats may be substrates for a DNA methyltransferase enzyme and indeed, it was shown that these repeats are methylated. Here, we analyse the methylation of telomeric cytosines and the length of telomeres in Arabidopsis thaliana methylation mutants (met 1-3 and ddm 1-8), and in their wild-type siblings that were germinated in the presence of hypomethylation drugs. Our results show that cytosine methylation in telomeric repeats depends on the activity of MET1 and DDM1 enzymes. Significantly shortened telomeres occur in later generations of methylation mutants as well as in plants germinated in the presence of hypomethylation drugs, and this phenotype is stably transmitted to the next plant generation. A possible role of compromised in vivo telomerase action in the observed telomere shortening is hypothesized based on telomere analysis of hypomethylated telomerase knockout plants. Results are discussed in connection with previous data in this field obtained using different model systems.     

Natural variation in a subtelomeric region of Arabidopsis: implications for the genomic dynamics of a chromosome end

We investigated genome dynamics at a chromosome end in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana through a study of natural variation in 35 wild accessions. We focused on the single-copy subtelomeric region of chromosome 1 north (approximately 3.5 kb), which represents the relatively simple organization of subtelomeric regions in this species. PCR fragment-length variation across the subtelomeric region indicated that the 1.4-kb distal region showed elevated structural variation relative to the centromere-proximal region. Examination of nucleotide sequences from this 1.4-kb region revealed diverse DNA rearrangements, including an inversion, several deletions, and an insertion of a retrotransposon LTR. The structures at the deletion and inversion breakpoints are characteristic of simple deletion-associated nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) events. There was strong linkage disequilibrium between the distal subtelomeric region and the proximal telomere, which contains degenerate and variant telomeric repeats. Variation in the proximal telomere was characterized by the expansion and deletion of blocks of repeats. Our sample of accessions documented two independent chromosome-healing events associated with terminal deletions of the subtelomeric region as well as the capture of a scrambled mitochondrial DNA segment in the proximal telomeric array. This natural variation study highlights the variety of genomic events that drive the fluidity of chromosome termini.     

Telomere Variation in Xenopus laevis

Eukaryotic telomeres are variable at several levels, from the length of the simple sequence telomeric repeat tract in different cell types to the presence or number of telomere-adjacent DNA sequence elements in different strains or individuals. We have investigated the sequence organization of Xenopus laevis telomeres by use of the vertebrate telomeric repeat (TTAGGG)_n and blot hybridization analysis. The (TTAGGG)_n-hybridizing fragments, which ranged from less than 10 to over 50 kb with frequently cutting enzymes, defined a pattern that was polymorphic between individuals. BAL 31 exonuclease treatment confirmed that these fragments were telomeric. The polymorphic fragments analyzed did not hybridize to 5S RNA sequences, which are telomeric according to in situ hybridization. When telomeric fragments from offspring (whole embryos) were compared to those from the spleens of the parents, the inheritance pattern of some bands was found to be unusual. Furthermore, in one cross, the telomeres of the embryo were shorter than the telomeres of the parents’ spleen, and in another, the male’s testis telomeres were shorter than those of the male’s spleen. Our data are consistent with a model for chromosome behavior that involves a significant amount of DNA rearrangement at telomeres and suggest that length regulation of Xenopus telomeres is different from that observed for Mus spretus and human telomeres.     

Factors influencing the recombinational expansion and spread of telomeric tandem arrays in Kluyveromyces lactis

We have previously shown that DNA circles containing telomeric repeats and a marker gene can promote the recombinational elongation of telomeres in Kluyveromyces lactis by a mechanism proposed to involve rolling-circle DNA synthesis. Wild-type cells acquire a long tandem array at a single telomere, while telomerase deletion (ter1-Δ) cells, acquire an array and also spread it to multiple telomeres. In this study, we further examine the factors that affect the formation and spread of telomeric tandem arrays. We show that a telomerase⁺ strain with short telomeres and high levels of subtelomeric gene conversion can efficiently form and spread arrays, while a telomere fusion mutant is not efficient at either process. This indicates that an elevated level of gene conversion near telomeres is required for spreading but that growth senescence and a tendency to elongate telomeres in the absence of exogenously added circles are not. Surprisingly, telomeric repeats are frequently deleted from a transforming URA3-telomere circle at or prior to the time of array formation by a mechanism dependent upon the presence of subtelomeric DNA in the circle. We further show that in a ter1-Δ strain, long tandem arrays can arise from telomeres initially containing a single-copy insert of the URA3-telomere sequence. However, the reduced rate of array formation in such strains suggests that single-copy inserts are not typical intermediates in arrays formed from URA3-telomere circles. Using heteroduplex circles, we have demonstrated that either strand of a URA3-telomere circle can be utilized to form telomeric tandem arrays. Consistent with this, we demonstrate that 100-nucleotide single-stranded telomeric circles of either strand can promote recombinational telomere elongation.     

Genomic organization of telomeric and subtelomeric sequences of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis

Telomeres are DNA-protein complexes that protect linear chromosomes from degradation and fusions. Telomeric DNA is repetitive and G-rich, and protrudes towards the end of the chromosomes as 3'G-overhangs. In Leishmania spp., sequences adjacent to telomeres comprise the Leishmania conserved telomere associated sequences (LCTAS) that are around 100 bp long and contain two conserved sequence elements (CSB1 and CSB2), in addition to non-conserved sequences. The aim of this work was to study the genomic organization of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis telomeric/subtelomeric sequences. Leishmania amazonensis chromosomes were separated in a single Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) gel as 25 ethidium bromide-stained bands. All of the bands hybridized with the telomeric probe (5'-TTAGGG-3')3 and with probes generated from the conserved subtelomeric elements (CSB1, CSB2). Terminal restriction fragments (TRF) of L. amazonensis chromosomes were analyzed by hybridizing restriction digested genomic DNA and chromosomal DNA separated in 2D-PFGE with the telomeric probe. The L. amazonensis TRF was estimated to be approximately 3.3 kb long and the telomeres were polymorphic and ranged in size from 0.2 to 1.0 kb. Afa I restriction sites within the conserved CSB1 elements released the telomeres from the rest of the chromosome. Bal 31-sensitive analysis confirmed the presence of terminal Afa I restriction sites and served to differentiate telomeric fragments from interstitial internal sequences. The size of the L. amazonensis 3' G-overhang was estimated by non-denaturing Southern blotting to be approximately 12 nt long. Using similar approaches, the subtelomeric domains CSB1 and CSB2 were found to be present in a low copy number compared to telomeres and were organized in blocks of 0.3-1.5 kb flanked by Hinf I and Hae III restriction sites. A model for the organization of L. amazonensis chromosomal ends is provided.     

Analysis of the subtelomeric regions of macronuclear gene-sized DNA molecules of the hypotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae: Implications for the DNA fragmentation process during macronuclear development?

The subtelomeric regions of macronuclear gene-sized DNA molecules from Stylonychia lemnae were analyzed. The results obtained indicate that these regions show a highly ordered and common sequence organization: Immediately adjacent to the telomeric sequence a short inverted repeat sequence is found, followed by another 7–9 bp inverted repeat sequence at approximately position 40. A 10 bp consensus sequence found in the subtelomeric regions of all gene-sized DNA molecules is found at approximately position 60 and in addition at about the same position palindromic sequences showing no homology to each other are localized. The biological significance of this sequence organization is discussed. © 1993Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Subtelomeric regions in mammalian cells are deficient in DNA double-strand break repair

We have previously demonstrated that double-strand breaks (DSBs) in regions near telomeres are much more likely to result in large deletions, gross chromosome rearrangements, and chromosome instability than DSBs at interstitial sites within chromosomes. In the present study, we investigated whether this response of subtelomeric regions to DSBs is a result of a deficiency in DSB repair by comparing the frequency of homologous recombination repair (HRR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) at interstitial and telomeric sites following the introduction of DSBs by I-SceI endonuclease. We also monitored the frequency of small deletions, which have been shown to be the most common mutation at I-SceI-induced DSBs at interstitial sites. We observed no difference in the frequency of small deletions or HRR at interstitial and subtelomeric DSBs. However, the frequency of NHEJ was significantly lower at DSBs near telomeres compared to interstitial sites. The frequency of NHEJ was also lower at DSBs occurring at interstitial sites containing telomeric repeat sequences. We propose that regions near telomeres are deficient in classical NHEJ as a result of the presence of cis-acting telomere-binding proteins that cause DSBs to be processed as though they were telomeres, resulting in excessive resection, telomere loss, and eventual chromosome rearrangements by alternative NHEJ.     

Telomere fusion in Drosophila: The role of subtelomeric chromatin

Drosophila telomeres are maintained by transposition to chromosome ends of the HeT-A, TART and TAHRE retrotransposons, collectively designated as HTT. Although all Drosophila telomeres terminate with HTT arrays and are capped by the terminin complex, they differ in the type of subtelomeric chromatin. The HTT sequences of YS, YL, XR, and 4L are juxtaposed to constitutive heterochromatin, while the HTTs of the other telomeres are linked to either the TAS repeat-associated chromatin (XL, 2L, 2R, 3L, 3R) or to the specialized 4R chromatin. We found that mutations in pendolino (peo) cause (telomeric fusions) that preferentially involve the heterochromatin-associated telomeres (Ha-telomeres), a telomeric fusion pattern never observed in the other 10 telomere-capping mutants characterized so far. Peo, is homologous to the E2 variant ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and is required for DNA replication. Our analyses lead us to hypothesize that DNA replication in Peo-depleted cells results in specific fusigenic lesions concentrated in Ha-telomeres. These data provide the first demonstration that subtelomeres can affect telomere fusion.