PlexinA1 signaling directs the segregation of proprioceptive sensory axons in the developing spinal cord

As different classes of sensory neurons project into the CNS, their axons segregate and establish distinct trajectories and target zones. One striking instance of axonal segregation is the projection of sensory neurons into the spinal cord, where proprioceptive axons avoid the superficial dorsal horn-the target zone of many cutaneous afferent fibers. PlexinA1 is a proprioceptive sensory axon-specific receptor for sema6C and sema6D, which are expressed in a dynamic pattern in the dorsal horn. The loss of plexinA1 signaling causes the shafts of proprioceptive axons to invade the superficial dorsal horn, disrupting the organization of cutaneous afferents. This disruptive influence appears to involve the intermediary action of oligodendrocytes, which accompany displaced proprioceptive axon shafts into the dorsal horn. Our findings reveal a dedicated program of axonal shaft positioning in the mammalian CNS and establish a role for plexinA1-mediated axonal exclusion in organizing the projection pattern of spinal sensory afferents.     

Type III neuregulin 1 regulates pathfinding of sensory axons in the developing spinal cord and periphery

Sensory axons must develop appropriate connections with both central and peripheral targets. Whereas the peripheral cues have provided a classic model for neuron survival and guidance, less is known about the central cues or the coordination of central and peripheral connectivity. Here we find that type III Nrg1, in addition to its known effect on neuron survival, regulates axon pathfinding. In type III Nrg1(-/-) mice, death of TrkA(+) nociceptive/thermoreceptive neurons was increased, and could be rescued by Bax elimination. In the Bax and type III Nrg1 double mutants, axon pathfinding abnormalities were seen for TrkA(+) neurons both in cutaneous peripheral targets and in spinal cord central targets. Axon guidance phenotypes in the spinal cord included penetration of axons into ventral regions from which they would normally be repelled by Sema3A. Accordingly, sensory neurons from type III Nrg1(-/-) mice were unresponsive to the repellent effects of Sema3A in vitro, which might account, at least in part, for the central projection phenotype, and demonstrates an effect of type III Nrg1 on guidance cue responsiveness in neurons. Moreover, stimulation of type III Nrg1 back-signaling in cultured sensory neurons was found to regulate axonal levels of the Sema3A receptor neuropilin 1. These results reveal a molecular mechanism whereby type III Nrg1 signaling can regulate the responsiveness of neurons to a guidance cue, and show that type III Nrg1 is required for normal sensory neuron survival and axon pathfinding in both central and peripheral targets.     

SEMA3A regulates developing sensory projections in the chicken spinal cord

The present study explores the role of SEMA3A (collapsin-1) in the temporal and spatial regulation of developing sensory projections in the chick spinal cord. During development, SEMA3A mRNA (SEMA3A) is first expressed throughout the spinal gray matter, but disappears from the dorsal region when small caliber (trkA(+)) sensory axon collaterals first grow into the dorsal horn. In explant cultures of spinal cord segments with attached sensory ganglia, the spatial extent of SEMA3A expression varied in different explants, but in each case the growth of trkA(+) sensory collaterals was largely excluded from areas of SEMA3A expression. To test if SEMA3A had a direct effect on sensory axon growth, we injected recombinant protein into the explants before placing them in culture. Increased levels of SEMA3A substantially reduced the ingrowth of trkA(+) axons, whereas trkC(+) axon collaterals were not affected. Consistent with the insensitivity of trkC(+) collaterals to SEMA3A, these collaterals did not express neuropilin-1, a receptor for SEMA3A. The inhibitory effects of SEMA3A on trkA(+) axons within the spinal cord suggests that the fall in SEMA3A expression in the dorsal horn may contribute to the initiation of growth of these axons into gray matter. In addition, the observation that trkA(+) axons frequently grew close to but rarely over areas of SEMA3A expression suggests that semaphorin may act principally as a short-range guidance cue within the spinal cord.     

Specification of synaptic connections between sensory and motor neurons in the developing spinal cord

Experimental studies of mechanisms underlying the specification of synaptic connections in the monosynaptic stretch reflex of frogs and chicks are described. Sensory neurons innervating the triceps brachii muscles of bullfrogs are born throughout the period of sensory neurogenesis and do not appear to be related clonally. Instead, the peripheral targets of these sensory neurons play a major role in determining their central connections with motoneurons. Developing thoracic sensory neurons made to project to novel targets in the forelimb project into the brachial spinal cord, which they normally never do. Moreover, these foreign sensory neurons make monosynaptic excitatory connections with the now functionally appropriate brachial motoneurons. Normal patterns of neuronal activity are not necessary for the formation of specific central connections. Neuromuscular blockade of developing chick embryos with curare during the period of synaptogenesis still results in the formation of correct sensory-motor connections. Competitive interactions among the afferent fibers also do not seem to be important in this process. When the number of sensory neurons projecting to the forelimb is drastically reduced during development, each afferent still makes central connections of the same strength and specificity as normal. These results are discussed with reference to the development of retinal ganglion cells and their projections to the brain. Although many aspects of the two systems are similar, patterned neural activity appears to play a much more important role in the development of the visual pathway than in the spinal reflex pathway described here.     

Target-derived GFRalpha1 as an attractive guidance signal for developing sensory and sympathetic axons via activation of Cdk5

Immobilized and diffusible molecular cues regulate axon guidance during development. GFRalpha1, a GPI-anchored receptor for GDNF, is expressed as both membrane bound and secreted forms by accessory nerve cells and peripheral targets of developing sensory and sympathetic neurons during the period of target innervation. A relative deficit of GFRalpha1 in developing axons allows exogenous GFRalpha1 to capture GDNF and present it for recognition by axonal c-Ret receptors. Exogenous GFRalpha1 potentiates neurite outgrowth and acts as a long-range directional cue by creating positional information for c-Ret-expressing axons in the presence of a uniform concentration of GDNF. Soluble GFRalpha1 prolongs GDNF-mediated activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), an event required for GFRalpha1-induced neurite outgrowth and axon guidance. Together with GDNF, target-derived GFRalpha1 can function in a non-cell-autonomous fashion as a chemoattractant cue with outgrowth promoting activity for peripheral neurons.     

Netrin-1 signaling for sensory axons: Involvement in sensory axonal development and regeneration

During development, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend their axons toward the dorsolateral part of the spinal cord and enter the spinal cord through the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). After entering the spinal cord, these axons project into the dorsal mantle layer after a “waiting period” of a few days. We revealed that the diffusible axonal guidance molecule netrin-1 is a chemorepellent for developing DRG axons. When DRG axons orient themselves toward the DREZ, netrin-1 proteins derived from the ventral spinal cord prevent DRG axons from projecting aberrantly toward the ventral spinal cord and help them to project correctly toward the DREZ. In addition to the ventrally derived netrin-1, the dorsal spinal cord cells adjacent to the DREZ transiently express netrin-1 proteins during the waiting period. This dorsally derived netrin-1 contributes to the correct guidance of DRG axons to prevent them from invading the dorsal spinal cord. In general, there is a complete lack of sensory axonal regeneration after a spinal cord injury, because the dorsal column lesion exerts inhibitory activities toward regenerating axons. Netrin-1 is a novel candidate for a major inhibitor of sensory axonal regeneration in the spinal cord; because its expression level stays unchanged in the lesion site following injury, and adult DRG neurons respond to netrin-1-induced axon repulsion. Although further studies are required to show the involvement of netrin-1 in preventing the regeneration of sensory axons in CNS injury, the manipulation of netrin-1-induced repulsion in the CNS lesion site may be a potent approach for the treatment of human spinal injuries.Key words: netrin-1, dorsal root ganglion, axon guidance, chemorepellent, Unc5, spinal cord, axon regenerationDeveloping axons navigate to their targets by responding to attractive and repulsive guidance cues working in a contact-dependent or diffusible fashion in their environment (reviewed in ref. ¹). During early development of the primary sensory system, centrally projecting sensory axons from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend toward the dorsolateral region of the spinal cord (Fig. 1A and C), where they enter the spinal cord exclusively through the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ), and never orient themselves toward the notochord or the ventral spinal cord (Fig. 1A; reviewed in ref. ²). We previously showed that the notochord but not the ventral spinal cord secretes semaphorin 3A (Sema3A), which is known to be a chemorepellent for DRG axons at early developmental stages (Fig. 1A).³ This is the reason why DRG axons never project toward the notochord. Along the same line, it is highly possible that the ventral spinal cord may secrete some chemorepulsive cue other than Sema3A for DRG axons.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Netrin-1 plays a critical role in sensory axonal guidance as an axon chemorepellent. (A) A schematic diagram of a thoracic transverse section of an E10 mouse embryo, summarizing the possible mechanism of netrin-1 action in early DRG axonal guidance. When DRG axons project toward the DREZ in the dorsal spinal cord (dSC), ventrally derived netrin-1 chemorepels DRG axons to prevent them from orienting aberrantly toward the ventral spinal cord (vSC) (upper). NC; notochord. In netrin-1-deficient embryos, some DRG axons misorient themselves toward the ventral spinal cord, because of the absence of netrin-1 proteins in the ventral spinal cord (lower). (B) At E12.5 when DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally (arrows) to form the dorsal funiculus (DF), netrin-1 proteins are transiently expressed in a subpopulation of dorsal spinal cord cells adjacent to the dorsal funiculus (upper). In netrin-1-deficient embryos, the dorsal funiculus is disorganized because DRG axons are no longer waiting for invading the dorsal mantle layer (lower). (C) Gain-of-function experiments by electroporation confirm the repulsive activity of netrin-1 toward DRG axons. When netrin-1 is misexpressed in the dorsal spinal cord, the number of DRG axons that enter the DREZ is significantly reduced compared with the control, because some DRG axons fail to project toward the DREZ and turn in the wrong direction.After entering the spinal cord, DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally to form the dorsal funiculus without projecting to the dorsal mantle layer for a few days (this delay of the axonal projection to the mantle layer is referred to as the ‘waiting period;’ Fig. 1B). A few days later, proprioceptive afferents of DRGs begin to send collaterals into the dorsal layers, and cutaneous afferents project ventrally through the dorsal layers.⁴ This evidence raises the possibility that some repulsive cues transiently prevent the collaterals of DRGs from penetrating the dorsal spinal cord during this waiting period.Netrins are a family of secreted proteins that play a key role in axonal guidance, cell migration, morphogenesis and angiogenesis.⁵ Netrin-1 is a bifunctional axonal guidance cue, attracting some axons including commissural axons via the Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) receptor and repelling others via Unc5 receptors (reviewed in ref. ⁶). However, it has not been clear whether netrin-1 plays a role in sensory axonal guidance during development.Several observations strongly suggest a role for netrin-1 in DRG axonal guidance as a repulsive guidance cue during development.^7,8 First, in the mouse embryo at embryonic day (E) 10–11.⁵ when many DRG axons orient themselves to reach the DREZ, netrin-1 is strongly expressed in the floor plate of the ventral spinal cord but not in the dorsal spinal cord (Fig. 1A). Second, at E12.5 when DRG neurons extend their axons longitudinally along the dorsolateral margin of the spinal cord, netrin-1 is expressed in the dorsolateral region adjacent to the DREZ (Fig. 1B), but its expression is down-regulated in the dorsal spinal cord at E13.5 when many collaterals have entered the mantle layer. Third, repulsive netrin-1 receptor Unc5c is expressed in the DRG neurons during development.These observations motivated us to explore whether netrin-1/Unc5c signaling contributes to DRG axonal guidance. We used cell and tissue cultures combined with tissues from netrin-1-deficient mice. We clearly showed that netrin-1 exerts a chemorepulsive activity toward developing DRG axons and that the ventral spinal cord-derived repulsive activity depends on netrin-1 in vitro.⁸ Additional evidence for a chemorepulsive role of netrin-1 came from the observation of DRG axonal trajectories in netrin-1-deficient mice.^7,8 In netrin-1-deficient embryos at E10, we showed that some DRG axons became misoriented toward the ventral spinal cord, probably because of the absence of netrin-1 proteins in the ventral spinal cord (Fig. 1A). In addition, at E12.5 when DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally to form the dorsal funiculus, the dorsal funiculus is disorganized in netrin-1-deficient embryos, because in the absence of netrin-1 DRG axons are not waiting for invading the dorsal mantle layer adjacent to the dorsal funiculus (Fig. 1B). Gain-of-function experiments further confirmed the repulsive activity of netrin-1 toward DRG axons (Fig. 1C). These lines of evidence lead us to the conclusion that dorsally derived netrin-1 plays an important role in providing the ‘waiting period’ for extension of collaterals from sensory afferents and that ventrally derived netrin-1 prevents sensory axons from misorienting themselves toward the ventral spinal cord.At later developmental stages (E13.5), DRG axons still possess a weak responsiveness to the chemorepulsive activity of netrin-1 in vitro.⁸ In addition, both postnatal and adult DRG neurons respond to netrin-1-induced axon inhibition.⁹ Consistent with these results, DRG neurons at not only later developmental stages (E13.5) but also postnatal stages express the repulsion-mediating netrin-1 receptor Unc5c.^8,9Generally, lesioning of the dorsal column projection of sensory axons results in a complete lack of regeneration. The possible explanation for the complete lack of regeneration is that the environment, the lesion site itself and/or oligodendrocytes adjacent to the lesion, may be non-permissive for regenerating axons.¹⁰ Sema3A and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) are candidates as major inhibitors of sensory axonal regeneration in the spinal cord, because they are expressed in the lesion site and can inhibit DRG axonal growth in vitro.^3,11–14 Recently, Kaneko et al. showed that a selective inhibitor of Sema3A also enhances axonal regeneration and functional recovery in a subpopulation of sensory neurons after lesioning of the dorsal column.¹² More recently, McMahon''s group clearly demonstrated that enzymatic degradation of CSPGs on the dorsal column lesion of the spinal cord promotes sensory axonal regeneration and functional recovery.^13,14 Although these treatments greatly improved functional recovery, complete sensory axonal growth and functional recovery have not been yet achieved after the spinal cord injury. To promote further recovery of sensory axonal regeneration in the CNS, we should focus on other candidate inhibitors of CNS injury sites.Following spinal cord injury, the expression of the attraction- mediating netrin-1 receptor DCC decreases, while the expression level of the repulsive receptor Unc5c returns to normal.¹⁵ Levels of netrin-1 expression also stay unchanged in neurons and oligodendrocytes adjacent to the lesion site. Together with the in vitro evidence described above, these data strongly suggest a possible role for netrin-1 as a novel inhibitor of CNS myelin for regenerating DRG axons in the dorsal column-lesioned spinal cord. Further studies will be required to show directly the functional recovery of sensory axons in the spinal cord by perturbation of netrin-1 in and around the lesion site after spinal cord injury.     

Regeneration of monoamine-containing axons in the developing and adult spinal cord of the rat following intraspinal 6-OH-dopamine injections or transections

Summary Growth of descending noradrenaline (NA) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) axons in the rat spinal cord during ontogenesis and following mechanical or chemical, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OH-DA) induced, axotomy, was studied with the Falck-Hillarp histochemical fluorescence method for monoamines.The major NA and 5-HT axon bundles and terminal innervation areas are present already at birth and an essentially mature pattern of innervation is reached after two weeks.Complete degeneration of both 5-HT and NA nerves in the distal segment is obtained by a transection of the spinal cord. Sprouting of the cut monoamine fibers into the necrotic zone and scar tissue is vigorous in both immature and mature animals, but regeneration into the distal segment is very poor.Selective degeneration of the descending NA axons and terminals is obtained by a localized intraspinal 6-OH-DA injection. Thus, the 5-HT fiber systems as well as all other parts of the spinal cord are left intact. The method should therefore prove useful for evaluating the exact functional role of the NA and 5-HT neuron systems in the spinal cord.Reinnervation of the distal part of the spinal cord by new NA fibers following 6-OH-DA induced denervation is described. This process is faster in younger animals but takes place also in adult animals. The present evidence suggests that reinnervation mainly is the result of downgrowth of the axotomized fibers, but growth in the form of collateral sprouting from a few possibly surviving fibers in the distal region may also contribute. Reinnervation lead to a normal innervation pattern within 1–2 months in the various age groups.It is suggested that the poor regeneration of many spinal nerve tracts often reported in the literature following transection of the spinal cord is due to extraneuronal factors such as scar tissue and impaired circulation rather than to the nerves per se since reinnervation by NA nerves was very poor following mechanical transection but good following chemical, 6-OH-DA-induced axotomy.     

Regional specificity of functional sensory connections in developing spinal cord cultures varies with the incidence of spontaneous bioelectric activity

Summary Cultured spinal cord explants in which little spontaneous bioelectric activity was present showed, when monitored using sensory ganglion-evoked monosynaptic action potentials, diffuse innervation by ingrowing afferent fibers at 3–4 weeks in vitro. In contrast, highly active cultures of the same age showed a strong tendency for functional sensory connections to be made within the dorsal half of the cord. Regional specificity was present in mature cultures (4–5 weeks in vitro), however, even when their spontaneous activity level was low. The results support earlier results using tetrodotoxin, and make it appear likely that centrally generated neuronal discharges can influence the topography of afferent terminals within the developing spinal cord.     

Hoxd10 induction and regionalization in the developing lumbosacral spinal cord

We have used Hoxd10 expression as a primary marker of the lumbosacral region to examine the early programming of regional characteristics within the posterior spinal cord of the chick embryo. Hoxd10 is uniquely expressed at a high level in the lumbosacral cord, from the earliest stages of motor column formation through stages of motoneuron axon outgrowth. To define the time period when this gene pattern is determined, we assessed Hoxd10 expression after transposition of lumbosacral and thoracic segments at early neural tube stages. We present evidence that there is an early prepattern for Hoxd10 expression in the lumbosacral neural tube; a prepattern that is established at or before stages of neural tube closure. Cells within more posterior lumbosacral segments have a greater ability to develop high level Hoxd10 expression than the most anterior lumbosacral segments or thoracic segments. During subsequent neural tube stages, this prepattern is amplified and stabilized by environmental signals such that all lumbosacral segments acquire the ability to develop high levels of Hoxd10, independent of their axial environment. Results from experiments in which posterior neural segments and/or paraxial mesoderm segments were placed at different axial levels suggest that signals setting Hoxd10 expression form a decreasing posterior-to-anterior gradient. Our experiments do not, however, implicate adjacent paraxial mesoderm as the only source of graded signals. We suggest, instead, that signals from more posterior embryonic regions influence Hoxd10 expression after the early establishment of a regional prepattern. Concurrent analyses of patterns of LIM proteins and motor column organization after experimental surgeries suggest that the programming of these characteristics follows similar rules.     

Protein synthesis in distal axons is not required for axon growth in the embryonic spinal cord

It is now well established that new proteins are synthesized in the distal segments of elongating axons, where they may play an essential role in some guidance decisions. It remains unclear, however, whether distal protein synthesis also plays an essential role in axon growth per se. Previous in vitro experiments have shown that blocking protein synthesis in distal axons has no effect on the rate of axonal advance. However, because these experiments were performed in vitro and over a relatively short time period, the role of distal protein synthesis over longer periods and in a native tissue environment remained untested. Here, we tested whether protein synthesis in distal axons plays an essential role in the elongation of descending axons in the embryonic spinal cord. We developed an in situ model of the brainstem-spinal projection of the embryonic chick, and developed a split-chamber method in which inhibitors of proteins synthesis could be applied independently to cell bodies in the brainstem or to distal axons in the spinal cord. When protein synthesis was blocked in distal axons, axon growth remained robust for 2 days, which is the length of the experiment. However, when protein synthesis was blocked only in the brainstem, axonal elongation in the spinal cord ceased within 6 h. These data showed that protein synthesis in the distal axon is not essential to continue the advance of axons. Rather, essential proteins are synthesized more proximally and then transported rapidly to the distal axon.     

Immunoreactivity of synapses on primary afferent axons and sensory neurons in lamprey spinal cord (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Lampetra fluviatilis</Emphasis>)

The ultrastructure and immunospecificity of synapses on primary afferents and dorsal sensory cells (DCs) were studied in lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) spinal cords. Using the postembedding immunogold method with a combination of antibodies—polyclonal antibodies to glutamate and monoclonal antibodies to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)—the presence of GABA-positive on the primary afferent axons and GABA-and glutamate-immunopositive synapses on the DC somatic membranes have been shown. Thus, it is obvious that sensory information in the lamprey is controlled by both presynaptic inhibition via synapses on the primary afferent axons and by direct synaptic influence on the body of the sensory neuron.