Stability testing of vaccines: Developing Countries Vaccine Manufacturers' Network (DCVMN) perspective

Stability testing is an integral part of the vaccine manufacturing process and is crucial for the success of immunization programs. WHO (World Health Organization) has recently published guidelines on the stability testing of vaccines. These guidelines enlist scientific basis and principles for stability testing at various stages like development, pre-clinical, clinical, licensing, lot release and post-licensure monitoring. DCVMN (Developing Countries Vaccine Manufacturers' Network) is an international body of developing countries vaccine manufacturers and has viewpoints on technical and administrative issues in stability testing of vaccines. We here highlight viewpoints, possible roles and global expectations of DCVMN in the area of stability testing of vaccines.     

A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table

Development and Phase 3 testing of the most advanced malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, indicates that malaria vaccine R&D is moving into a new phase. Field trials of several research malaria vaccines have also confirmed that it is possible to impact the host-parasite relationship through vaccine-induced immune responses to multiple antigenic targets using different platforms. Other approaches have been appropriately tested but turned out to be disappointing after clinical evaluation. As the malaria community considers the potential role of a first-generation malaria vaccine in malaria control efforts, it is an apposite time to carefully document terminated and ongoing malaria vaccine research projects so that lessons learned can be applied to increase the chances of success for second-generation malaria vaccines over the next 10 years. The most comprehensive resource of malaria vaccine projects is a spreadsheet compiled by WHO thanks to the input from funding agencies, sponsors and investigators worldwide. This spreadsheet, available from WHO's website, is known as "the rainbow table". By summarizing the published and some unpublished information available for each project on the rainbow table, the most comprehensive review of malaria vaccine projects to be published in the last several years is provided below.     

Rabies reference vaccine for use as a regional standard for Latin America and the Caribbean countries

A candidate rabies reference vaccine of suckling mouse brain (SMB) origin was prepared and standardized at the Pan American Zoonoses Center (PAHO/WHO) and evaluated in a collaborative study involving seven laboratories. On the basis of three different tests, its potency, immunogenicity, and stability were demonstrated to be satisfactory. The vaccine was proposed for consideration of the Latin American and Caribbean countries as a regional standard to determine the potency of SMB vaccines, the most widely used in the Region.     

The quality standardization of a national vaccine against yellow fever

One of the commercial lots of yellow fever vaccine has been attested as the National Branch Standard (NBS) of yellow fever vaccine. This NBS has been studied in all tests required by the regulations for standard vaccines. The NBS has been found to meet the necessary requirements in all its characteristics. The study of the thermostability of the NBS at temperatures of 4-10 degrees C, 20-22 degrees C, 37 degrees C during storage for 24 hours to 1 year has revealed the rapid loss of the infectious capacity of the virus at the above temperatures and its high stability during storage at -20 degrees C. Thus, the NBS has been found to retain the required level of immunizing potency for 3 months at a temperature of 4-10 degrees C, for 1 month at 20-22 degrees C and for 2 weeks (the term of observation) at 37 degrees C. The heat resistance of the NBS of yellow fever vaccine corresponds to the WHO requirements. The newly developed NBS has been used as the standard preparation for controlling 27 lots of commercial yellow fever vaccine.     

Boosting Global Yellow Fever Vaccine Supply for Epidemic Preparedness: 3 Actions for China and the USA

<正>Yellow fever(YF) is an acute disease caused by a flavivirus that infects the liver. It can cause jaundice, bleeding, kidney damage, and death. No antiviral therapy exists.A vaccine does exist, however, and fortunately confers lifelong immunity after a single dose(Monath et al. 2016;WHO 2017 a, b).YF is transmitted by mosquitoes in two main cycles. In     

Comparison between in vitro potency tests for Cuban hepatitis B vaccine: contribution to the standardization process.

Quality control of recombinant Hepatitis B vaccines performed by National Control Laboratories prior to marketing vaccine batches requires in vivo and or a well validated in vitro potency assays as recommended by WHO technical series. The in vitro test must also demonstrate its suitability for monitoring the consistency of the vaccine manufacturer. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between both in vitro potency tests performed by Cuban manufacturer and National Control Laboratory for Hepatitis B vaccine and the suitability of our method for monitoring the manufacturer's test results and consistency. We also intended to contribute to the standardisation process consisting of in vitro methods for this vaccine.     

Global immunization policies and recommendations: objectives and process

The World Health Organization (WHO) has a dual mandate of providing global policies, standards and norms as well as support for member countries in applying such policies and standards to national programmes with the aim to improve health. The vaccine world is changing and with it the demands and expectations of the global and national policy makers, donors, and other interested parties. Changes pertain to : new vaccines and technologies developments, vaccine safety issues, regulation and approval of vaccines, and increased funding flowing through new financing mechanisms. This places a special responsibility on WHO to respond effectively. WHO has recently reviewed and optimized its policy making structure for vaccines and immunization and adjusted it to the new Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, which broadens the scope of immunization efforts to all age groups and vaccines with emphasis on integration of immunization delivery with other health interventions. This includes an extended consultation process to promptly generate evidence base recommendations, ensuring transparency of the decision making process and added communication efforts. This article presents the objectives and impact of the process set to develop global immunization policies, norms, standards and recommendations. The key advisory committees landscape contributing to this process is described. This includes the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts, the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety and the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. The elaboration of WHO vaccine position papers is also described.     

The WHO network of collaborating centres on standardization and regulatory evaluation of vaccines

WHO Collaborating Centres (CCs) form part of an international collaborative network set up by WHO in support of its mandated programme at the country, intercountry, regional, interregional and global levels, as appropriate. As part of its mandate in the area of biologicals, WHO has broadened the scope of its work and has expanded the range of activities devoted to the establishment of international standards for vaccines. In line with global immunization goals, the need for standards for evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy of new vaccines, as well as those that have been in use for a long time, has significantly increased. Furthermore, complex issues related to new production methodologies, more sophisticated techniques for characterization and laboratory testing, and for nonclinical and clinical evaluation of vaccines have raised a number of regulatory challenges for WHO when requested to assist its Member States. In this context, CCs in the area of standardization of vaccines and biotherapeutics (excluding blood products) have provided technical assistance and have broadened the scope of their work over time. In the area of standardization and regulatory evaluation of vaccines, WHO currently has six CCs as well as one candidate centre for which the designation process has been initiated and a further three candidate centres with great potential. The purpose of the meeting held on 24–26 April 2012 was to improve understanding of WHO's priorities in setting standards, to facilitate their implementation, and to increase transparency of the roles and responsibilities of CCs. The meeting was also an excellent opportunity to explore possibilities for improving collaboration between WHO and CCs, as well as among CCs themselves by working as a CC network. All CCs expressed a wish for increased interaction, information-sharing, collaboration and other ways of working together that may lead to cross-fertilization between the CCs. Synergy was recognized as a significant mechanism for leveraging existing resources in responding to global public health challenges and in addressing WHO's priorities. Agreement was reached for operating as a network of CCs.     

Application of deglycosylation and electrophoresis to the quantification of influenza viral hemagglutinins facilitating the production of 2009 pandemic influenza (H1N1) vaccines at multiple manufacturing sites in China

The single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) method currently used to determine the hemagglutinin (HA) content of the inactivated influenza vaccines depends on the availability of reference HA antigen and corresponding anti-serum, updated and provided annually by World Health Organization (WHO) collaborative centers. Particularly early in a pandemic outbreak, reference reagents could be the bottleneck in vaccine development and release. Therefore, other reliable tests capable of quantifying HA content could substantially shorten the time needed for vaccine formulation. Here electrophoretic separation of deglycosylated samples in conjunction with densitometry was used to quantify HA contents of H1N1 vaccine at multiple manufacturing sites. We found the overall consistency between the alternative method and traditional SRID was 88–122% in seven lots of vaccine bulks from four subtypes (types) of influenza vaccine, confirming its suitability to quantify HA content. Moreover, we used the alternative method to prepare a national HA antigen reference in China for quality control of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccines prior to the arrival of the WHO SRID reference standards, subsequently confirming good agreement between both methods. The alternative method for vaccine quantification enabled the Chinese health authority to approve H1N1 vaccine 1 month earlier than otherwise possible.     

WHO Study Group on cell substrates for production of biologicals, Geneva, Switzerland, 11–12 June 2007

For many years, the World Health Organization (WHO) has provided global leadership in defining technical specifications for quality assurance and safety of biological medicines produced in cell substrates. Current WHO requirements for the use of animal cells as substrates for production of vaccines and other biologicals were adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in 1996 (WHO TRS 878). Since then, significant progress especially in the development of vaccines in novel continuous cell lines of mammalian origin as well as in insect cells has been made and consequently there is an increasing need for the re-evaluation of existing criteria for the acceptability of such cell lines. In addition there is also a need to consider new issues in cell substrate safety arising from these new cell types and developments in technology and scientific knowledge. In response to these demands, the WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates was formed in 2006 to initiate revision of WHO requirements and to address the need for further research in this area. At its second meeting on 11-12 June 2007, the Study Group reviewed scientific data that would form the basis for new recommendations and made a number of proposals for further investigations. The Study Group is working on the preparation of a revised WHO document, and a broad consultation with regulators, manufacturers, and other relevant parties is planned for 2008.     

候选结核疫苗的评价模型

卡介苗作为目前唯一批准使用的预防结核疫苗,由于无法提供充足的保护力,目前结核病依然是严重危害人类健康的传染病,因此筛选优质候选疫苗迫在眉睫。所有候选疫苗进入临床试验前必须评价其安全性、免疫原性以及有效性。评价结果在一定程度上也预示候选疫苗在人体的免疫作用,也是目前评价候选疫苗是否优于传统卡介苗的依据。论述候选结核疫苗临床试验前所使用的体内和体外评价模型。对评价模型的充分认识将提高候选疫苗评价数据对人体临床试验的预测意义,也可更具体地执行实验动物的替代、减少和优化原则。     

Manufacturing and supply of monovalent oral polio vaccines.

A new polio vaccine was developed, produced and licensed by sanofi pasteur at the request of the World Health Organization (WHO) for mass immunization campaigns in endemic countries such as Egypt. The new vaccine, monovalent oral polio vaccine 1 or mOPV1, is currently used in Egypt as a critical part of a new WHO strategy to end polio type 1 transmission by the end of the year 2005 (types 2 and 3 polioviruses have already been eliminated from Egypt). To answer this specific need, an urgent program was mounted by Sanofi pasteur to manufacture 50million doses for Egypt, in close collaboration with WHO and National Regulatory Agencies (France and Egypt). The joint efforts between manufacturer, regulators and the WHO resulted in the quickest ever vaccine development and licensure and WHO pre-qualification. The production of mOPV was based on existing tOPV but with appropriate "change control" procedures to assure the quality of the product, and to distinguish mOPV from tOPV. Key success factors included clear and careful definition of the project; close collaboration between manufacturer, regulators and WHO; and commitment and motivation of staff. As a result, development and production of mOPV1 vaccine were carried out in a drastically reduced time period, leading to the release and delivery of the first 15 million doses of mOPV1 in April 2005.     

Strategies for developing vaccines against H5N1 influenza A viruses

Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus (H5N1 subtype) infections in poultry and humans (through direct contact with infected birds) have raised concerns that a new influenza pandemic might occur in the near future. Effective vaccines against H5N1 virus are, therefore, urgently needed. Reverse-genetics-based inactivated vaccines have been prepared according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and are now undergoing clinical evaluation in several countries. Here, we review the current strategies for the development of H5N1 influenza vaccines, and future directions for vaccine development.     

Licensing of monovalent OPV1 vaccine.

The key steps in the successful accelerated licensure of monovalent type 1 oral polio vaccine (mOPV1) of Sanofi Pasteur in Egypt required innovative parallel track evaluation from the National Regulatory Authorities (NRA), both in producing and receiving countries. The standard package of regulatory data was requested and submitted simultaneously in France and Egypt, and to WHO for prequalification purposes. The main concern of the Egyptian NRA has been thermal stability of the vaccine because it will be used in very hot conditions. However, data from the field suggest that mOPV1 has a stability profile similar to trivalent OPV (tOPV). Surveillance for Vaccine Associated Paralytic Polio (VAPP) will be important in development in tropical countries during the early introduction of mOPV since little or no recent data are currently available.     

Collaborative study to assess the suitability of a candidate International Standard for yellow fever vaccine

Yellow fever vaccines are routinely assayed by plaque assay. However, the results of these assays are then converted into mouse LD(50) using correlations/conversion factors which, in many cases, were established many years ago. The minimum required potency in WHO Recommendations is 10(3) LD(50)/dose. Thirteen participants from 8 countries participated in a collaborative study whose aim was to assess the suitability of two candidate preparations to serve as an International Standard for yellow fever vaccine. In addition, the study investigated the relationship between the mouse LD(50) test and plaque forming units with a view to updating the WHO recommendations. Plaque assays were more reproducible than mouse assays, as expected. Differences in sensitivities of plaque assays were observed between laboratories but these differences appear to be consistent within a laboratory for all samples and the expression of potency relative to the candidate standard vaccine improved the reproducibility of assays between laboratories. However, the use of potencies had little effect on the between laboratory variability in mouse LD(50) assays. There appears to be a consistent relationship between overall mean LD(50) and plaques titre for all study preparations other than sample E. The slope of the correlation curve is >1 and it would appear that 10(3) LD(50) is approximately equivalent to 10(4) plaque forming units (PFU), based on the overall means of all laboratory results. The First International Standard for yellow fever vaccine, NIBSC Code 99/616, has been established as the First International Standard for yellow fever vaccine by the Expert Committee of Biological Standards of the World Health Organisation. The International Standard has been arbitrarily assigned a potency of 10(4.5) International Units (IU) per ampoule. Manufacturers and National Control Laboratories are including the First International Standard for yellow fever vaccine in routine assays so that the minimum potency in IU of vaccines released for use and which meet the current minimum potency of 10(3) LD(50) in mouse assays, can be determined. These data will be analysed before a review of the WHO requirements, including the minimum potency per dose, is undertaken.     

Expert examination of the immunogenic activity and toxicity of the pertussis component of adsorbed and non-adsorbed diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines. Results of interlaboratory investigations under the WHO project "Reactogenicity and Toxicity of DPT Vaccines"

Since the DPT vaccine is broadly used for the prevention of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis' its preparations should meet special quality requirements. The present study was aimed at evaluating the reproducibility of laboratory methods utilized to assess the protective activity and toxicity of the pertussis component as well as at examining the feasibility of expert estimations of product quality to enhance the validity of findings. The results of interlaboratory comparative examination of quality parameters of the tested preparations revealed that the routine laboratory quality control methods were not sufficiently standardized as their application in different laboratories did not always produce identical results. The WHO criteria to evaluate the toxicity of pertussis vaccines are far from perfect since vaccines with pronounced toxicity can only be distinguished from those with moderate to mild toxicity after the administration to tested mice of vaccines at a single infant dose of 0.5 ml. To enhance the reproducibility of methods employed in the laboratory, appropriate standard specimens of the preparation should be used serving as a measure of different quality parameters; all test conditions should be also standardized as far as possible. To enable objective quality evaluation of medical biological preparations, the degree of experiment reproducibility should be regularly verified in interlaboratory tests on an international scale as well as inside those countries which have several manufacturers of a given preparation. It appears expedient to set up an international system of expert evaluation of quality of biological preparations by appointing several regional and national centres which meet the requirements for expert laboratories.     

Calibration of replacement international standard and European pharmacopoeia biological reference preparation for tetanus toxoid, adsorbed.

Here we report the characterisation of a preparation of tetanus toxoid, adsorbed, and its calibration by 27 laboratories in 19 countries in a joint international collaborative study co-sponsored by World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee of Biological Standardization (ECBS) and the European Biological Standardisation Programme of European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM), Council of Europe. Calibration was in terms of the Second International Standard (I.S.) for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed, by the established WHO/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) challenge methods. The replacement standard preparation was found to have a unitage of 469 IU/ampoule on the basis of its calibration in guinea-pigs and 496 IU/ampoule on the basis of its calibration in mice. Assessment, both within the collaborative study and as part of candidate characterisation, indicated satisfactory stability of the candidate preparation. This study also provided some information on the effect of mouse strain on potency testing of tetanus vaccines. A limited assessment of the impact of the replacement standard on testing of current production batches of vaccines was also carried out by four manufacturers. This study did not directly address the serological approaches to potency testing. However, one laboratory offered data from mouse serology assay, which gave comparable estimates to in vivo mouse bioassay.Based on the results of this study and with the agreement of participants, the candidate standard was established as the Third International Standard for Tetanus Toxoid, Adsorbed (coded 98/552) by the WHO Expert Committee of Biological Standardization (ECBS) in November 2000. The same preparation was also established as the second Ph Eur Biological Reference Preparation (Ph Eur BRP, batch no. 2) by the Steering Committee of the Biological Standardisation Programme of the EDQM and approved by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission.     

Veterinary and human vaccine evaluation methods

Despite the universal importance of vaccines, approaches to human and veterinary vaccine evaluation differ markedly. For human vaccines, vaccine efficacy is the proportion of vaccinated individuals protected by the vaccine against a defined outcome under ideal conditions, whereas for veterinary vaccines the term is used for a range of measures of vaccine protection. The evaluation of vaccine effectiveness, vaccine protection assessed under routine programme conditions, is largely limited to human vaccines. Challenge studies under controlled conditions and sero-conversion studies are widely used when evaluating veterinary vaccines, whereas human vaccines are generally evaluated in terms of protection against natural challenge assessed in trials or post-marketing observational studies. Although challenge studies provide a standardized platform on which to compare different vaccines, they do not capture the variation that occurs under field conditions. Field studies of vaccine effectiveness are needed to assess the performance of a vaccination programme. However, if vaccination is performed without central co-ordination, as is often the case for veterinary vaccines, evaluation will be limited. This paper reviews approaches to veterinary vaccine evaluation in comparison to evaluation methods used for human vaccines. Foot-and-mouth disease has been used to illustrate the veterinary approach. Recommendations are made for standardization of terminology and for rigorous evaluation of veterinary vaccines.