Utilization of Immunoglobulin G Fc Receptors by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: a Specific Role for Antibodies against the Membrane-Proximal External Region of gp41

Receptors (FcγRs) for the constant region of immunoglobulin G (IgG) are an important link between humoral immunity and cellular immunity. To help define the role of FcγRs in determining the fate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) immune complexes, cDNAs for the four major human Fcγ receptors (FcγRI, FcγRIIa, FcγRIIb, and FcγRIIIa) were stably expressed by lentiviral transduction in a cell line (TZM-bl) commonly used for standardized assessments of HIV-1 neutralization. Individual cell lines, each expressing a different FcγR, bound human IgG, as evidence that the physical properties of the receptors were preserved. In assays with a HIV-1 multisubtype panel, the neutralizing activities of two monoclonal antibodies (2F5 and 4E10) that target the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of gp41 were potentiated by FcγRI and, to a lesser extent, by FcγRIIb. Moreover, the neutralizing activity of an HIV-1-positive plasma sample known to contain gp41 MPER-specific antibodies was potentiated by FcγRI. The neutralizing activities of monoclonal antibodies b12 and 2G12 and other HIV-1-positive plasma samples were rarely affected by any of the four FcγRs. Effects with gp41 MPER-specific antibodies were moderately stronger for IgG1 than for IgG3 and were ineffective for Fab. We conclude that FcγRI and FcγRIIb facilitate antibody-mediated neutralization of HIV-1 by a mechanism that is dependent on the Fc region, IgG subclass, and epitope specificity of antibody. The FcγR effects seen here suggests that the MPER of gp41 could have greater value for vaccines than previously recognized.Fc receptors (FcRs) are differentially expressed on a variety of cells of hematopoietic lineage, where they bind the constant region of antibody (Ab) and provide a link between humoral and cellular immunity. Humans possess two classes of FcRs for the constant region of IgG (FcγRs) that, when cross-linked, are distinguished by their ability to either activate or inhibit cell signaling (69, 77, 79). The activating receptors FcγRI (CD64), FcγRIIa (CD32), and FcγRIII (CD16) signal through an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), whereas FcγRIIb (CD32) contains an inhibitory motif (ITIM) that counters ITAM signals and B-cell receptor signals. It has been suggested that a balance between activating and inhibitory FcγRs coexpressed on the same cells plays an important role in regulating adaptive immunity (23, 68). Moreover, the inhibitory FcγRIIb, being the sole FcγR on B cells, appears to play an important role in regulating self-tolerance (23, 68). The biologic role of FcγRs may be further influenced by differences in their affinity for immunoglobulin G (IgG); thus, FcγRI is a high-affinity receptor that binds monomeric IgG (mIgG) and IgG immune complexes (IC), whereas FcγRIIa, FcγRIIb, and FcγRIIIa are medium- to low-affinity receptors that preferentially bind IgG IC (10, 49, 78). FcγRs also exhibit differences in their relative affinity for the four IgG subclasses (10), which has been suggested to influence the balance between activating and inhibitory FcγRs (67).In addition to their participation in acquired immunity, FcγRs can mediate several innate immune functions, including phagocytosis of opsonized pathogens, Ab-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), antigen uptake by professional antigen-presenting cells, and the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (26, 35, 41, 48, 69). In some cases, interaction of Ab-coated viruses with FcγRs may be exploited by viruses as a means to facilitate entry into FcγR-expressing cells (2, 33, 47, 84). Several groups have reported FcγR-mediated Ab-dependent enhancement (ADE) of HIV-1 infection in vitro (47, 51, 58, 63, 94, 96), whereas other reports have implicated FcγRs in efficient inhibition of the virus in vitro (19, 21, 29, 44-46, 62, 98) and possibly as having beneficial effects against HIV-1 in vivo (5, 27, 28, 42). These conflicting results are further complicated by the fact that HIV-1-susceptible cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, can coexpress more than one FcγR (66, 77, 79).HIV-1 entry requires sequential interactions between the viral surface glycoprotein, gp120, and its cellular receptor (CD4) and coreceptor (usually CCR5 or CXCR4), followed by membrane fusion that is mediated by the viral transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 (17, 106). Abs neutralize the virus by binding either gp120 or gp41 and blocking entry into cells. Several human monoclonal Abs that neutralize a broad spectrum of HIV-1 variants have attracted considerable interest for vaccine design. Epitopes for these monoclonal Abs include the receptor binding domain of gp120 in the case of b12 (71, 86), a glycan-specific epitope on gp120 in the case of 2G12 (13, 85, 86), and two adjacent epitopes in the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of g41 in the cases of 2F5 and 4E10 (3, 11, 38, 93). At least three of these monoclonal Abs have been shown to interact with FcRs and to mediate ADCC (42, 43).A highly standardized and validated assay for neutralizing Abs against HIV-1 that quantifies reductions in luciferase (Luc) reporter gene expression after a single round of virus infection in TZM-bl cells has been developed (60, 104). TZM-bl (also called JC53BL-13) is a CXCR4-positive HeLa cell line that was engineered to express CD4 and CCR5 and to contain integrated reporter genes for firefly Luc and Escherichia coli β-galactosidase under the control of the HIV-1 Tat-regulated promoter in the long terminal repeat terminal repeat sequence (74, 103). TZM-bl cells are permissive to infection by a wide variety of HIV-1, simian immunodeficiency virus, and human-simian immunodeficiency virus strains, including molecularly cloned Env-pseudotyped viruses. Here we report the creation and characterization of four new TZM-bl cell lines, each expressing one of the major human FcγRs. These new cell lines were used to gain a better understanding of the individual roles that FcγRs play in determining the fate of HIV-1 IC. Two FcγRs that potentiated the neutralizing activity of gp41 MPER-specific Abs were identified.     

Serine Dephosphorylation of Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase α in Mitosis Induces Src Binding and Activation

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α (RPTPα) is the mitotic activator of the protein tyrosine kinase Src. RPTPα serine hyperphosphorylation was proposed to mediate mitotic activation of Src. We raised phosphospecific antibodies to the two main serine phosphorylation sites, and we discovered that RPTPα Ser204 was almost completely dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, whereas Ser180 and Tyr789 phosphorylation were only marginally reduced in mitosis. Concomitantly, Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 were dephosphorylated, resulting in 2.3-fold activation of Src in mitosis. Using inhibitors and knockdown experiments, we demonstrated that dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 in mitosis was mediated by PP2A. Mutation of Ser204 to Ala did not activate RPTPα, and intrinsic catalytic activity of RPTPα was not affected in mitosis. Interestingly, binding of endogenous Src to RPTPα was induced in mitosis. GRB2 binding to RPTPα, which was proposed to compete with Src binding to RPTPα, was only modestly reduced in mitosis, which could not account for enhanced Src binding. Moreover, we demonstrate that Src bound to mutant RPTPα-Y789F, lacking the GRB2 binding site, and mutant Src with an impaired Src homology 2 (SH2) domain bound to RPTPα, illustrating that Src binding to RPTPα is not mediated by a pTyr-SH2 interaction. Mutation of RPTPα Ser204 to Asp, mimicking phosphorylation, reduced coimmunoprecipitation with Src, suggesting that phosphorylation of Ser204 prohibits binding to Src. Based on our results, we propose a new model for mitotic activation of Src in which PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 facilitates Src binding, leading to RPTPα-mediated dephosphorylation of Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 and hence modest activation of Src.Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are responsible for dephosphorylation of the phosphotyrosyl residues. The human genome contains approximately 100 genes that encode members of the four PTP families, and most of them have mouse orthologues (2, 48). According to their subcellular localization, the classical PTPs, encoded by less than half of the total PTP genes, are divided into two subfamilies: cytoplasmic and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs). The majority of the RPTPs contain, besides a variable extracellular domain and a transmembrane domain, two highly homologous phosphatase domains (27), with the membrane-proximal domain comprising most of the catalytic activity (33).RPTPα is a typical RPTP with a small, highly glycosylated extracellular domain (13). RPTPα function is regulated by many mechanisms, including proteolysis (18), oxidation (55), dimerization (7, 23, 24, 47, 52), and phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues (16, 17, 49). RPTPα is broadly expressed in many cell types, and over the years, RPTPα has been shown to be involved in a number of signaling mechanisms, including neuronal (15) and skeletal muscle (34) cell differentiation, neurite elongation (8, 9, 56), insulin receptor signaling downregulation (3, 28, 30, 31, 35), insulin secretion (25), activation of voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.2 (51), long-term potentiation in hippocampal neurons (32, 38), matrix-dependent force transduction (53), and cell spreading and migration (21, 45, 57).The majority of the roles played in these cellular processes involve RPTPα''s ability to activate the proto-oncogenes Src and Fyn by dephosphorylating their C-terminal inhibitory phosphotyrosine (5, 15, 39, 45, 61). Normally, this phosphotyrosine (pTyr527 in chicken Src) binds to the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, keeping the protein in an inactive closed conformation. A displacement mechanism was proposed for RPTPα-mediated Src activation in which pTyr789 of RPTPα is required to bind the SH2 domain of Src before RPTPα dephosphorylates Tyr527 (58). This model is the subject of debate since other studies show that RPTPα lacking Tyr789 is still able to dephosphorylate and activate Src (12, 26, 29, 56). In normal cells, Src reaches its activation peak during mitosis (4, 11, 40, 42), and with the help of overexpressing cells, it was shown that this activation is triggered mainly by RPTPα. The model that emerged is that RPTPα is activated in mitosis due to serine hyperphosphorylation and detaches from the GRB2 scaffolding protein (59, 60) that normally binds most of the pTyr789 of RPTPα via its SH2 domain (14, 17, 46). Two serine phosphorylation sites were mapped in the juxtamembrane domain of RPTPα, Ser180 and Ser204 (49). The kinases that were found responsible for their phosphorylation were protein kinase C delta (PKCdelta) (10) and CaMKIIalpha (9), but there is no clear evidence that these kinases are activated in mitosis. We set out to investigate the role of serine phosphorylation of RPTPα in mitotic activation of Src.We generated phosphospecific antibodies and show that RPTPα pSer204, but not pSer180, is dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, concomitantly with activation of Src. Selective inhibitors suggested that PP2A was the phosphatase that dephosphorylated pSer204. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of the catalytic subunit of PP2A demonstrated that indeed PP2A was responsible for mitotic dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204. It is noteworthy that PP2A is known to be activated in mitosis. Intrinsic PTP activities of RPTPα were similar in unsynchronized and mitotic cells, and mutation of Ser204 did not activate RPTPα in in vitro PTP assays. Yet, Src binding to RPTPα was induced in mitotic NIH 3T3 cells and RPTPα-S204D with a phosphomimicking mutation at Ser204 coimmunoprecipitated less efficiently with Src. Based on our results, we propose a mechanism for mitotic activation of Src that is triggered by dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204, resulting in enhanced affinity for Src and subsequent dephosphorylation and activation of Src.     

Caveolin-1 Modulates HIV-1 Envelope-Induced Bystander Apoptosis through gp41

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope (Env)-mediated bystander apoptosis is known to cause the progressive, severe, and irreversible loss of CD4⁺ T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. Env-induced bystander apoptosis has been shown to be gp41 dependent and related to the membrane hemifusion between envelope-expressing cells and target cells. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1), the scaffold protein of specific membrane lipid rafts called caveolae, has been reported to interact with gp41. However, the underlying pathological or physiological meaning of this robust interaction remains unclear. In this report, we examine the interaction of cellular Cav-1 and HIV gp41 within the lipid rafts and show that Cav-1 modulates Env-induced bystander apoptosis through interactions with gp41 in SupT1 cells and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes isolated from human peripheral blood. Cav-1 significantly suppressed Env-induced membrane hemifusion and caspase-3 activation and augmented Hsp70 upregulation. Moreover, a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence markedly inhibited bystander apoptosis and apoptotic signal pathways. Our studies shed new light on the potential role of Cav-1 in limiting HIV pathogenesis and the development of a novel therapeutic strategy in treating HIV-1-infected patients.HIV infection causes a progressive, severe, and irreversible depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, which is responsible for the development of AIDS (9). The mechanism through which HIV infection induces cell death involves a variety of processes (58). Among these processes, apoptosis is most likely responsible for T-cell destruction in HIV-infected patients (33), because active antiretroviral therapy has been associated with low levels of CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (7), and AIDS progression was shown previously to correlate with the extent of immune cell apoptosis (34). Importantly, bystander apoptosis of uninfected cells was demonstrated to be one of the major processes involved in the destruction of immune cells (58), with the majority of apoptotic CD4⁺ T cells in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes being uninfected in HIV patients (22).Binding to uninfected cells or the entry of viral proteins released by infected cells is responsible for the virus-mediated killing of innocent-bystander CD4⁺ T cells (2-4, 9, 65). The HIV envelope glycoprotein complex, consisting of gp120 and gp41 subunits expressed on an HIV-infected cell membrane (73), is believed to induce bystander CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (58). Although there is a soluble form of gp120 in the blood, there is no conclusive agreement as to whether the concentration is sufficient to trigger apoptosis (57, 58). The initial step in HIV infection is mediated by the Env glycoprotein gp120 binding with high affinity to CD4, the primary receptor on the target cell surface, which is followed by interactions with the chemokine receptor CCR5 or CXCR4 (61). This interaction triggers a conformational change in gp41 and the insertion of its N-terminal fusion peptide into the target membrane (30). Next, a prehairpin structure containing leucine zipper-like motifs is formed by the two conserved coiled-coil domains, called the N-terminal and C-terminal heptad repeats (28, 66, 70). This structure quickly collapses into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure with an N-terminal heptad repeat inside and a hydrophobic C-terminal heptad repeat outside (28, 66, 70). The formation of the six-helix bundle leads to a juxtaposition and fusion with the target cell membrane (28, 66, 70). The fusogenic potential of HIV Env is proven to correlate with the pathogenesis of both CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic viruses by not only delivering the viral genome to uninfected cells but also mediating Env-induced bystander apoptosis (71). Initial infection is dominated by the CCR5-tropic strains, with the CXCR4-tropic viruses emerging in the later stages of disease (20). Studies have shown that CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 triggers more depletion of CD4⁺ T cells than CCR5-tropic strains (36).Glycolipid- and cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, are spatially organized plasma membranes and are known to have many diverse functions (26, 53). These functions include membrane trafficking, endocytosis, the regulation of cholesterol and calcium homeostasis, and signal transduction in cellular growth and apoptosis. Lipid rafts have also been implicated in HIV cell entry and budding processes (19, 46, 48, 51). One such organelle is the caveola, which is a small, flask-shaped (50 to 100 nm in diameter) invagination in the plasma membrane (5, 62). The caveola structure, which is composed of proteins known as caveolins, plays a role in various functions by serving as a mobile platform for many receptors and signal proteins (5, 62). Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a 22- to 24-kDa major coat protein responsible for caveola assembly (25, 47). This scaffolding protein forms a hairpin-like structure and exists as an oligomeric complex of 14 to 16 monomers (21). Cav-1 has been shown to be expressed by a variety of cell types, mostly endothelial cells, type I pneumocytes, fibroblasts, and adipocytes (5, 62). In addition, Cav-1 expression is evident in immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (38, 39). However, Cav-1 is not expressed in isolated thymocytes (49). Furthermore, Cav-1 and caveolar structures are absent in human or murine T-cell lines (27, 41, 68). Contrary to this, there has been one report showing evidence of Cav-1 expression in bovine primary cell subpopulations of CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD21⁺, and IgM⁺ cells with Cav-1 localized predominantly in the perinuclear region (38). That report also demonstrated a membrane region staining with Cav-1-specific antibody of human CD21⁺ and CD26⁺ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Recently, the expression of Cav-1 in activated murine B cells, with a potential role in the development of a thymus-independent immune response, was also reported (56). It remains to be determined whether Cav-1 expression is dependent on the activation state of lymphocytes. For macrophages, however, which are one of the main cell targets for HIV infection, Cav-1 expression has been clearly documented (38).The scaffolding domain of Cav-1, located in the juxtamembranous region of the N terminus, is responsible for its oligomerization and binding to various proteins (5, 62, 64). It recognizes a consensus binding motif, ΦXΦXXXXΦ, ΦXXXXΦXXΦ, or ΦXΦXXXXΦXXΦ, where Φ indicates an aromatic residue (F, W, or Y) and X indicates any residue (5, 62, 64). A Cav-1 binding motif (WNNMTWMQW) has been identified in the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41 (42, 43). Cav-1 has been shown to associate with gp41 by many different groups under various circumstances, including the immunoprecipitation of gp41 and Cav-1 in HIV-infected cells (42, 43, 52). However, the underlying pathological or physiological functions of this robust interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 remain unclear.Here, we report that the interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 leads to a modification of gp41 function, which subsequently regulates Env-induced T-cell bystander apoptosis. Moreover, we show that a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence is capable of modulating Env-induced bystander apoptosis, which suggests a novel therapeutic application for HIV-1-infected patients.     

mTORC1-Activated S6K1 Phosphorylates Rictor on Threonine 1135 and Regulates mTORC2 Signaling

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that forms two functionally distinct complexes important for nutrient and growth factor signaling. While mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, mTORC2 plays an important role in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Akt. Interestingly, mTORC1 negatively regulates Akt activation, but whether mTORC1 signaling directly targets mTORC2 remains unknown. Here we show that growth factors promote the phosphorylation of Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), an essential subunit of mTORC2. We found that Rictor phosphorylation requires mTORC1 activity and, more specifically, the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). We identified several phosphorylation sites in Rictor and found that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 in vitro and in vivo, in a rapamycin-sensitive manner. Phosphorylation of Rictor on Thr1135 did not affect mTORC2 assembly, kinase activity, or cellular localization. However, cells expressing a Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt. In addition, phosphorylation of the Akt substrates FoxO1/3a and glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) was found to be increased in these cells, indicating that S6K1-mediated phosphorylation of Rictor inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling. Together, our results uncover a new regulatory link between the two mTOR complexes, whereby Rictor integrates mTORC1-dependent signaling.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionarily conserved phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related Ser/Thr kinase that integrates signals from nutrients, energy sufficiency, and growth factors to regulate cell growth as well as organ and body size in a variety of organisms (reviewed in references 4, 38, 49, and 77). mTOR was discovered as the molecular target of rapamycin, an antifungal agent used clinically as an immunosuppressant and more recently as an anticancer drug (5, 20). Recent evidence indicates that deregulation of the mTOR pathway occurs in a majority of human cancers (12, 18, 25, 46), suggesting that rapamycin analogs may be potent antineoplastic therapeutic agents.mTOR forms two distinct multiprotein complexes, the rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (mTORC1 and mTORC2), respectively (6, 47). In cells, rapamycin interacts with FKBP12 and targets the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTORC1, thereby inhibiting some of its function (13, 40, 66). mTORC1 is comprised of the mTOR catalytic subunit and four associated proteins, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), mLST8 (mammalian lethal with sec13 protein 8), PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa), and Deptor (28, 43, 44, 47, 59, 73, 74). The small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain) is a key upstream activator of mTORC1 that is negatively regulated by the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 GTPase-activating protein complex (reviewed in reference 35). mTORC1 is activated by PI3K and Ras signaling through direct phosphorylation and inactivation of TSC2 by Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p90 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK) (11, 37, 48, 53, 63). mTORC1 activity is also regulated at the level of Raptor. Whereas low cellular energy levels negatively regulate mTORC1 activity through phosphorylation of Raptor by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (27), growth signaling pathways activating the Ras/ERK pathway positively regulate mTORC1 activity through direct phosphorylation of Raptor by RSK (10). More recent evidence has also shown that mTOR itself positively regulates mTORC1 activity by directly phosphorylating Raptor at proline-directed sites (20a, 75). Countertransport of amino acids (55) and amino acid signaling through the Rag GTPases were also shown to regulate mTORC1 activity (45, 65). When activated, mTORC1 phosphorylates two main regulators of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, the AGC (protein kinase A, G, and C) family kinase p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and thus stimulates protein synthesis and cellular growth (50, 60).The second mTOR complex, mTORC2, is comprised of mTOR, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1), mLST8, PRR5 (proline-rich region 5), and Deptor (21, 39, 58, 59, 66, 76, 79). Rapamycin does not directly target and inhibit mTORC2, but long-term treatment with this drug was shown to correlate with mTORC2 disassembly and cytoplasmic accumulation of Rictor (21, 39, 62, 79). Whereas mTORC1 regulates hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of S6K1, mTORC2 has been shown to phosphorylate other members of the AGC family of kinases. Biochemical and genetic evidence has demonstrated that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 (26, 39, 68, 70), thereby contributing to growth factor-mediated Akt activation (6, 7, 52). Deletion or knockdown of the mTORC2 components mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8 has a dramatic effect on mTORC2 assembly and Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (26, 39, 79). mTORC2 was also shown to regulate protein kinase Cα (PKCα) (26, 66) and, more recently, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1) (4, 22). Recent evidence implicates mTORC2 in the regulation of Akt and PKCα phosphorylation at their turn motifs (19, 36), but whether mTOR directly phosphorylates these sites remains a subject of debate (4).Activation of mTORC1 has been shown to negatively regulate Akt phosphorylation in response to insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (reviewed in references 30 and 51). This negative regulation is particularly evident in cell culture models with defects in the TSC1/TSC2 complex, where mTORC1 and S6K1 are constitutively activated. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by mTORC1 (72) and its downstream target S6K1 has been shown to decrease its stability and lead to an inability of insulin or IGF1 to activate PI3K and Akt (29, 69). Although the mechanism is unknown, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGF-Rβ) has been found to be downregulated in TSC1- and TSC2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), contributing to a reduction of PI3K signaling (80). Interestingly, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by mTORC1 has also been observed in the presence of growth factors other than IGF-1, insulin, or PDGF, suggesting that there are other mechanisms by which mTORC1 activation restricts Akt activity in cells (reviewed in references 6 and 31). Recent evidence demonstrates that rapamycin treatment causes a significant increase in Rictor electrophoretic mobility (2, 62), suggesting that phosphorylation of the mTORC2 subunit Rictor may be regulated by mTORC1 or downstream protein kinases.Herein, we demonstrate that Rictor is phosphorylated by S6K1 in response to mTORC1 activation. We demonstrate that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 and found that a Rictor mutant lacking this phosphorylation site increases Akt phosphorylation induced by growth factor stimulation. Cells expressing the Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased Akt signaling to its substrates compared to Rictor wild-type- and T1135D mutant-expressing cells. Together, our results suggest that Rictor integrates mTORC1 signaling via its phosphorylation by S6K1, resulting in the inhibition of mTORC2 and Akt signaling.     

Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8+ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid compared to those in blood among antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-positive subjects

During untreated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells partially control HIV replication in peripheral lymphoid tissues, but host mechanisms of HIV control in the central nervous system (CNS) are incompletely understood. We characterized HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood among seven HIV-positive antiretroviral therapy-naïve subjects. All had grossly normal brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy and normal neuropsychometric testing. Frequencies of epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells by direct tetramer staining were on average 2.4-fold higher in CSF than in blood (P = 0.0004), while HIV RNA concentrations were lower. Cells from CSF were readily expanded ex vivo and responded to a broader range of HIV-specific human leukocyte antigen class I restricted optimal peptides than did expanded cells from blood. HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells, in contrast to total CD8⁺ T cells, in CSF and blood were at comparable maturation states, as assessed by CD45RO and CCR7 staining. The strong relationship between higher T-cell frequencies and lower levels of viral antigen in CSF could be the result of increased migration to and/or preferential expansion of HIV-specific T cells within the CNS. This suggests an important role for HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in control of intrathecal viral replication.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) invades the central nervous system (CNS) early during primary infection (21, 30, 35), and proviral DNA persists in the brain throughout the course of HIV-1 disease (7, 25, 29, 47, 77, 83). Limited data from human and nonhuman primate studies suggest that little or no viral replication occurs in the brain during chronic, asymptomatic infection, based on the absence of demonstrable viral RNA or proteins (8, 85). In contrast, cognitive impairment affects approximately 40% of patients who progress to advanced AIDS without highly active antiretroviral therapy (21, 30, 35, 65). During HIV-associated dementia, there is active HIV-1 replication in the brain (23, 52, 61, 81), and viral sequence differences between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral tissues suggest distinct anatomic compartments of replication (18, 19, 22, 53, 75, 76, 78). Host mechanisms that control viral replication in the CNS during chronic, asymptomatic HIV-1 infection are incompletely understood.Anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells are present in blood and peripheral tissues throughout the course of chronic HIV-1 infection (2, 14). Multiple lines of evidence support a critical role for these cells in controlling HIV-1 replication. During acute HIV-1 infection, the appearance of CD8⁺ T-cell responses correlates temporally with a decline in viremia (11, 43), and a greater proliferative capacity of peripheral blood HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells correlates with better control of viremia (36, 54). In addition, the presence of certain major histocompatibility complex class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, notably HLA-B*57, predicts slower progression to AIDS and death during chronic, untreated HIV-1 infection (55, 62). Finally, in the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) model, macaques depleted of CD8⁺ T cells experience increased viremia and rapid disease progression (39, 51, 67).Little is known regarding the role of intrathecal anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells in HIV neuropathogenesis. Nonhuman primate studies have identified SIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the CNS early after infection (16, 80). Increased infiltration of SIV antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes has been detected only in CSF of slow progressors without neurological symptoms (72). In chronically infected macaques with little or no SIV replication in the brain, the frequency of HIV-specific T cells was higher in CSF than in peripheral blood but did not correlate with the level of plasma viremia or CD4⁺ T-cell counts (56). Although intrathecal anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells may help control viral replication, a detrimental role in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1 has also been postulated (38). Immune responses contribute to neuropathogenesis in models of other infectious diseases, and during other viral infections cytotoxic T lymphocytes can worsen disease through direct cytotoxicity or release of inflammatory cytokines such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (3, 17, 31, 37, 42, 44, 71).We tested the hypothesis that quantitative and/or qualitative differences in HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses are present in CSF compared to blood during chronic, untreated HIV-1 infection. We characterized HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses in CSF among seven antiretroviral therapy-naïve adults with chronic HIV-1 infection, relatively high peripheral blood CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and low plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations. We show that among these HIV-positive individuals with no neurological symptoms and with little or no HIV-1 RNA in CSF, frequencies of HIV-specific T cells are significantly higher in CSF than in blood. These CSF cells are at a state of differentiation similar to that of T cells in blood and are functionally competent for expansion and IFN-γ production. The higher frequency of functional HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in CSF, in the context of low or undetectable virus in CSF, suggests that these cells play a role in the control of intrathecal viral replication.