Regulatory roles of leptin at the hypothalamic-hypophyseal axis before and after sexual maturation in cattle

Studies assessed, either directly or indirectly, the role of GnRH in leptin-mediated stimulation of LH release in cattle before and after sexual maturation. In experiment 1, the objectives were to determine whether leptin could acutely accelerate the frequency of LH pulses, and putatively GnRH pulses, in prepubertal heifers at different stages of development. In experiment 2, we determined directly whether acute, leptin-mediated increases in LH secretion in the fasted, mature female are accompanied by an increase in GnRH secretion. Ten-month-old prepubertal heifers (experiment 1) fed normal- (n = 5) and restricted-growth (n = 5) diets received three injections of saline or recombinant ovine leptin (oleptin; 0.2 microg/kg body weight, i.v.) at hourly intervals during 5-h experiments conducted every 5 wk until all normal-growth heifers were pubertal. Leptin increased mean concentrations of circulating LH regardless of diet, but pulse characteristics were not altered at any age. In experiment 2, ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted cows (n = 5) were fasted twice for 72 h and treated with either saline or oleptin i.v. (as in experiment 1) on Day 3 of each fast. Leptin increased plasma concentrations of LH and third ventricle cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of GnRH, and increased the amplitude of LH and the size of GnRH pulses, respectively, on Day 3 of fasting compared to saline. Overall, results indicate that leptin is unable to accelerate the pulse generator in heifers at any developmental stage. However, leptin-mediated augmentation of LH concentrations and pulse amplitude in the nutritionally stressed, mature female are associated with modifications in GnRH secretory dynamics.     

FACTORS AFFECTING THE SECRETION OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE IN THE EWE

(1) Luteinizing hormone (LH) is secreted as discrete pulses throughout all stages of the reproductive cycle of the ewe, including pre-pubertal, seasonal and lactational anoestrus, and the luteal and follicular phases of the oestrous cycle. Secretion is probably also pulsatile during the preovulatory surge of LH. (2) The secretion of LH is affected by the ovarian steroids, oestradiol and progesterone, both of which act principally to reduce the frequency of the pulses. During the luteal phase the two steroids act synergistically to exert this effect, and during anoestrus oestradiol acts independently of progesterone. Androstenedione secreted by the ovary apparently has no role in the control of LH secretion. (3) The amplitude of the pulses may also be affected by the steroids but there are conflicting reports on these effects, some showing that amplitude is lowered by the presence of oestrogen and others showing increases in amplitude in the presence of oestrogen and progesterone. (4) The secretion of LH pulses is affected by photoperiod, social environment and nutrition. Under the influence of decreasing day-length, oestradiol alone cannot reduce the frequency of pulses and the ewe experiences oestrous cycles. When day-length is increasing, the hypothalamus becomes more responsive to oestradiol which reduces the frequency of the pulses. (5) A hypothetical pheromone secreted by rams can increase the frequency of the LH pulses in anoestrous ewes and thereby induce ovulation, possibly by inhibiting the negative feedback exerted by oestradiol. (6) The relationships between nutrition and reproduction are poorly understood, but it seems likely that the effects of nutrition are mediated partly through the hypothalamus and its control of the secretion of LH pulses. (7) The pulses of LH secreted by the anterior pituitary gland are evoked by pulses of GnRH secreted by the hypothalamus. The location of the centre controlling the GnRH pulses and the neurotransmitter involved are not known.     

Does the seasonal increase in estradiol negative feedback prevent luteinizing hormone surges in anestrous ewes by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency?

To test the hypothesis that the anestrous increase in estradiol negative feedback prevents estrous cycles by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency, a variety of regimens of increasing GnRH pulse frequency were administered to anestrous ewes for 3 days. A luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was induced in 45 of 46 ewes regardless of amplitude or frequency of GnRH pulses, but only 19 had luteal phases. Estradiol administration induced LH surges in 6 of 6 ewes, only 3 having luteal phases. Anestrous luteal phase progesterone profiles were similar in incidence, time course, and amplitude to those of the first luteal phases of the breeding season, which in turn had lower progesterone maxima than late breeding season luteal phases. In the remaining ewes, progesterone increased briefly or not at all, the increases being similar to the transient rises in progesterone occurring in most ewes at the onset of the breeding season. These results demonstrate that increasing GnRH pulse frequency induces LH surges in anestrus and that the subsequent events are similar to those at the beginning of the breeding season. Finally, they support the hypothesis that the negative feedback action of estradiol prevents cycles in anestrus by suppressing the frequency of the hypothalamic pulse generator.     

Photoperiodic regulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion and adenohypophyseal gene expression in female golden hamsters.

LH concentrations were measured in serum collected at 10-min intervals from chronically ovariectomized female Syrian hamsters that had been maintained for 9 wk in stimulatory (long) or inhibitory (short) photoperiods. Short days reduced the number of detectable LH pulses during both the morning and the afternoon. Most short-day hamsters experienced a gradual afternoon rise in serum LH concentrations; this rise was not composed of multiple pulses. In separate groups of similarly treated hamsters, pituitary LH-beta mRNA abundance was significantly reduced by short-day exposure at both times of day even though serum LH concentrations rose in the afternoon. Estradiol treatment induced an afternoon surge of serum LH in both photoperiods, and eliminated the effect of photoperiod on LH-beta mRNA abundance in the afternoon. Serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations were not consistently influenced by day length in castrated hamsters with or without estrogen treatment, but PRL mRNA abundance was significantly suppressed by short-day exposure in all groups. The results indicate that day length exerts profound steroid-independent effects upon hypophyseal gene expression, and that the regulation of LH-beta mRNA abundance may be due to photoperiodic control of the neural GnRH pulse generator.     

Compensation by pulsatile GnRH infusions for incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and castrated male pigs.

The aim of this study was to investigate incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and male pigs. Gilts (250 days old; n = 36), which had been ovariectomized 30 (OVX 30) or 100 days (OVX 100) before the start of treatment, were challenged i.m. with oestradiol benzoate and were either given no further treatment, fed methallibure to inhibit endogenous GnRH release or fed methallibure and given i.v. pulses of 100 or 200 ng GnRH agonist at 1 h intervals during the LH surge (48-96 h after oestradiol benzoate). The same treatments were applied to long-term orchidectomized male pigs (ORC, n = 23). In addition, one ORC group was not injected with oestradiol benzoate but was fed methallibure and given pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist. Oestradiol benzoate alone induced an LH surge in the OVX 30 group only (5/6 gilts), methallibure suppressed (P < 0.05) oestradiol benzoate-induced LH secretion, while pulses of 100 ng GnRH agonist in animals fed methallibure produced LH surges in four of six OVX 30 and four of six OVX 100 gilts. The induced LH surges were similar to those produced by oestradiol benzoate alone in OVX 30 gilts. Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist produced LH surges in OVX 30 (6/6) and OVX 100 (6/6) gilts and increased the magnitude of the induced LH surge in OVX 100 gilts (P < 0.05 compared with 100 ng GnRH agonist or OVX 30 control). Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist also induced LH surge release in ORC male pigs (5/6), but were unable to increase LH concentrations in a surge-like manner in ORC animals that had not been given oestradiol benzoate, indicating that oestradiol increases pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. These results support the hypothesis that oestradiol must inhibit secretion of LH before an LH surge can occur. It is concluded that incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovarian secretion-deprived gilts and in male pigs is due to the failure of oestradiol to promote a sufficient increase in the release of GnRH.     

Exposure to ram wool stimulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the female goat

In the sheep and goat, exposure of anestrous females to a conspecific male odor enhances reproductive activity. Interestingly, a previous report indicated that male goat hair stimulated pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe. In the present study, we addressed whether ram wool affects the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator activity in the female goat. Five ovariectomized (OVX) goats were chronically implanted with recording electrodes in the mediobasal hypothalamus, and manifestations of the GnRH pulse generator were monitored as characteristic increases in multiple-unit activity (MUA volleys). Wool or hair samples were collected from a mature ram, ewe and male goat, and their effects on the MUA volley were examined. The exposure to ram wool induced an MUA volley within 1 min in all five OVX goats, as did the exposure to male goat hair. The ewe wool had no effect on the timing of an MUA volley occurrence. An invariable association of MUA volleys with LH pulses in the peripheral circulation was also confirmed in two OVX goats exposed to ram wool. The present results clearly indicate that exposure to ram wool stimulates pulsatile GnRH/LH release in the female goat. Since exposure to male goat hair enhances pulsatile LH secretion in the ewe, it is likely that very similar, if not identical, molecules are contained in the male-effect pheromone in the sheep and goat.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol after administration of a GnRH agonist in the ovariectomized ewe

Administration of a GnRH agonist (5 micrograms) every 12 h to long-term ovariectomized ewes for 5 or 10 days during the breeding season suppressed mean LH levels from around 6 to 1 ng/ml on Days 1 and 4 after treatment; on Day 1 after treatment LH pulse frequency and amplitude were lower than pretreatment values. On Day 4 after treatment LH pulse frequency was restored to pretreatment levels (1 per h) whereas LH pulse amplitude had only slightly increased from 0.5 to 1 ng/ml, a value 25% of that before treatment. This increase in amplitude was greater the shorter the duration of treatment. Ovariectomized ewes treated with the agonist for 5 days exhibited both negative and positive feedback actions after implantation of a capsule containing oestradiol; however, compared to control ewes treated with oestradiol only, the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol were blunted. These results suggest that the recovery of tonic LH concentrations after GnRH agonist-induced suppression is limited primarily by changes in LH pulse amplitude. The results also demonstrate that the feedback actions of oestradiol are attenuated, but not blocked, by GnRH agonist treatment.     

Effects of breed, ovarian steroids and season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

The effects of season and of oestradiol and progesterone on the tonic secretion of LH were studied in ovariectomized Merino and Suffolk ewes, two breeds which differ markedly in the seasonal pattern of their reproductive activity. In the absence of exogenous steroids, the frequency of LH pulses was lower and the amplitude of the pulses was higher in anoestrus than in the breeding season for Merino and Suffolk ewes 30 days after ovariectomy. In long-term (190 days) ovariectomized ewes, this seasonal change in LH secretion was observed in Suffolk ewes only. During seasonal anoestrus, treatment of ewes with subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants (3, 6 or 12 mm in length) decreased the frequency of LH pulses in a dose-dependent manner, with Suffolk ewes being far more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of oestradiol than Merino ewes. The lowest dose of oestradiol (3 mm) had no effect on the secretion of LH in Merino ewes, but reduced secretion in Suffolk ewes. Treatment of ewes with the highest dose of oestradiol (12 mm) completely abolished LH pulses in Suffolk ewes, whereas infrequent pulses remained evident in Merino ewes. During the breeding season, oestradiol alone had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH in either breed, but in combination with progesterone there was a significant reduction in LH pulse frequency. Progesterone effectively decreased LH secretion in both breeds in both seasons. It was concluded that differences between breeds in the 'depth' of anoestrus could be related to differences in the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to both negative feedback by oestradiol and the direct effects of photoperiod.     

Effects of infusion of GnRH pulses and level of body condition on ovarian function in postpartum beef cows

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that postpartum anoestrus in beef cows is prolonged in cows in low body condition (BC) because they have a reduced LH pulse frequency compared with cows in high BC. Thirty-six multiparous Blue-Grey (White Shorthorn × Galloway) cows were fed so that they calved in either low (L) (BC score 2.07; SE 0.05; n = 24) or high (H) (BC score 2.81; SE 0.08; n = 12) body condition. They were then fed to maintain BC after calving. Twelve L cows were infused (i.v.) with 2 μg GnRH in 2 ml saline every 2 h from 5 to 7 weeks postpartum (LG) while the remaining L cows and all H cows were infused with saline only (LS and HS). Ovulations, as indicated by the presence of a morphologically normal corpus luteum, were recorded in one, one and ten of the cows of the LS, HS and LG groups, respectively. Mean LH concentrations and pulse frequencies were not affected by either GnRH treatment or BC but mean LH pulse amplitudes were lower (P < 0.05) in LG and LS cows than in HS cows at Week 5 and in LG cows at Week 6. At Week 7 postpartum, the numbers of small (3–7.9 mm diameter) and large (≥ 8 mm diameter) ovarian follicles, mean granulosa cell numbers per follicle and mean concentrations of LH receptors (pg per mg thecal and granulosa tissue) were not affected by GnRH treatment or BC. Granulosa cells from oestrogen active follicles of HS and LG cows secreted more oestradiol in vitro (P < 0.01) than cells from LS cows. However, there were no significant differences with treatment in the intrafollicular concentrations of oestradiol, testosterone or insulin-like growth factor-1. It was concluded that, since infusion of GnRH pulses enhanced both follicular steroidogenesis and the incidence of ovulation in low BC cows, the frequency of GnRH pulses is one determinant of follicle development in the postpartum cow. While H cows also exhibited a degree of enhancement of oestradiol synthesis by the granulosa cells of oestrogenic follicles, compared with L cows there was no difference in the LH pulse frequency or in the incidence of ovulation. It is concluded that there may be a threshold level of oestrogen synthesis by granulosa cells below which the final stages of follicle maturation and ovulation cannot be initiated, or that a high rate of oestradiol synthesis by this tissue is not the only factor mediating the effects of body condition on follicle development in the postpartum cow.     

Effects of adrenalectomy on photoperiod-induced changes in release of luteinizing hormone and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

Finnish Landrace x Southdown ewes were ovariectomized (OVX) and subjected to daily photoperiods of 16L:8D (Group I) or 8L:16D (Group II) for 84 days. Ewes were then either adrenalectomized (ADX) (N = 5 for Group I; N = 4 for Group II) or sham ADX (N = 6 for Groups I + II). After surgery, ewes in Group I were subjected to 8L:16D for 91 days and 16L:8D for 91 days whereas ewes in Group II were exposed to 16L:8D for 91 days and 8L:16D for 91 days. Oestradiol implants were inserted into all ewes on Day 148. Sequential blood samples were taken at 28, 56, 91, 119, 147 and 168 days after surgery to determine secretory profiles of LH and prolactin. Photoperiod did not influence LH release in Group I in the absence of oestradiol. Although photoperiod influenced frequency and amplitude of LH pulses in Group II before oestradiol treatment, adrenalectomy did not prevent these changes in patterns of LH release. However, in Group II the increase in LH pulse amplitude during exposure to long days was greater (P less than 0.01) in adrenalectomized ewes than in sham-operated ewes. Mean concentrations of LH increased in ADX ewes on Days 91 (P = 0.07) and 119 (P less than 0.05). Adrenalectomy failed to influence photoperiod-induced changes in mean concentrations of LH, amplitude of LH pulses and frequency of LH pulses in the presence of oestradiol. Concentrations of prolactin were influenced by photoperiod. In Groups I and II concentrations of prolactin increased (P less than 0.01) after adrenalectomy, but the magnitude of this effect decreased over time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prolactin suppresses GnRH but not TSH secretion

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In animal models, prolactin increases tuberoinfundibular dopamine turnover, which has been demonstrated to suppress both hypothalamic GnRH and pituitary TSH secretion. To test the hypothesis that prolactin suppresses GnRH and TSH secretion in women, as preliminary evidence that a short-feedback dopamine loop also operates in the human, the effect of hyperprolactinemia on GnRH and TSH secretion was examined. METHODS: Subjects (n=6) underwent blood sampling every 10 min in the follicular phase of a control cycle and during a 12-hour recombinant human prolactin (r-hPRL) infusion preceded by 7 days of twice-daily subcutaneous r-hPRL injections. LH and TSH pulse patterns and menstrual cycle parameters were measured. RESULTS: During the 7 days of r-hPRL administration, baseline prolactin increased from 16.0+/-3.0 to 101.6+/-11.6 microg/l, with a further increase to 253.7+/-27.7 microg/l during the 12-hour infusion. LH pulse frequency decreased (8.7+/-1.0 to 6.0+/-1.0 pulses/12 h; p<0.05) with r-hPRL administration, but there were no changes in LH pulse amplitude or mean LH levels. There were also no changes in TSH pulse frequency, mean or peak TSH. The decreased LH pulse frequency did not affect estradiol, inhibin A or B concentrations, or menstrual cycle length. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that hyperprolactinemia suppresses pulsatile LH secretion but not TSH secretion and suggest that GnRH secretion is sensitive to hyperprolactinemia, but that TSH secretion is not. These data further suggest that the degree of GnRH disruption after 7 days of hyperprolactinemia is insufficient to disrupt menstrual cyclicity.     

Differential regulation of the gonadotropin storage pattern by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the ewe

The differential control of gonadotropin secretion by GnRH pulse frequency may reflect changes in the storage of LH and FSH. To test this hypothesis, ovariectomized ewes passively immunized against GnRH received pulsatile injections of saline (group 1) or GnRH analogue: 1 pulse/6 h for group 2 or 1 pulse/h for group 3, during 48 h. Immunization against GnRH suppressed pulsatility of LH release and reduced mean FSH plasma levels (3.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.1 ng/ml before and 3 days after immunization, respectively). Pulsatile GnRH analogue replacement restored LH pulses but not FSH plasma levels. Low and high frequencies of GnRH analogue increased the percentage of LH-containing cells in a similar way (group 1 = 6.9 +/- 0.5% vs. group 2 = 10.5 +/- 0.8%, or vs. group 3 = 9.6 +/- 0.4%). In contrast, the rise of the percentage of FSH-containing cells was greater after administration of the analogue at low frequency than at high frequency (group 1 = 3.7 +/- 0.4% vs. group 2 = 8.4 +/- 0.2%, or vs. group 3 = 5.2 +/- 0.8%). Moreover, while GnRH pulse frequency had no differential effect on FSHbeta mRNA levels, LHbeta mRNA levels were higher under high than low frequency. These data showed that the frequency of GnRH pulses can modulate the gonadotropin storage pattern in the ewe. These changes may be a component of the differential regulation of LH and FSH secretion.     

Effect of the introduction of rams during the anoestrous season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

Introduction of rams to ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants (N = 10) increased the frequency of LH pulses from 4 X 8 to 10 X 6 pulses per 12 h. This effect was reflected by increases in mean levels of LH and the basal levels upon which the pulses were superimposed. In ewes that had not been treated with oestradiol (N = 5), there was no significant increase in pulse frequency but mean and basal levels of LH increased slightly after the introduction of rams. In a second experiment, similar effects of the introduction of rams were seen in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol or oestradiol + androstenedione (N = 16), but no significant effects of the rams were observed in untreated ewes (N = 8) or ewes treated only with androstenedione (N = 7). No preovulatory surges of LH were observed in the 30-h period after the introduction of rams. It was concluded that the ram stimulus probably evokes the increase in pulse frequency by inhibiting the negative feedback action of oestradiol, and that the surge normally observed in entire ewes is dependent on the ovarian response to these pulses. However, the observation of responses in some ewes not treated with oestradiol also raises the possibility that the ram stimulus can act directly on the hypothalamic neurones that control the secretion of LH, and that this effect is enhanced in the presence of oestrogen.     

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse-frequency modulation on luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone secretion in hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected rams

The effects of changes in pulse frequency of exogenously infused gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) were investigated in 6 adult surgically hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected (HPD) gonadal-intact rams. Ten-minute sampling in 16 normal animals prior to HPD showed endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses occurring every 2.3 h with a mean pulse amplitude of 1.11 +/- 0.06 (SEM) ng/ml. Mean testosterone and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were 3.0 +/- 0.14 ng/ml and 0.85 +/- 0.10 ng/ml, respectively. Before HPD, increasing single doses of GnRH (50-500 ng) elicited a dose-dependent rise of LH, 50 ng producing a response of similar amplitude to those of spontaneous LH pulses. The effects of varying the pulse frequency of a 100-ng GnRH dose weekly was investigated in 6 HPD animals; the pulse intervals explored were those at 1, 2, and 4 h. The pulsatile GnRH treatment was commenced 2-6 days after HPD when plasma testosterone concentrations were in the castrate range (less than 0.5 ng/ml) in all animals. Pulsatile LH and testosterone secretion was reestablished in all animals in the first 7 days by 2-h GnRH pulses, but the maximal pulse amplitudes of both hormones were only 50 and 62%, respectively, of endogenous pulses in the pre-HPD state. The plasma FSH pattern was nonpulsatile and FSH concentrations gradually increased in the first 7 days, although not to the pre-HPD range. Increasing GnRH pulse frequency from 2- to 1-hour immediately increased the LH baseline and pulse amplitude. As testosterone concentrations increased, the LH responses declined in a reciprocal fashion between Days 2 and 7. FSH concentration decreased gradually over the 7 days at the 1-h pulse frequency. Slowing the GnRH pulse to a 4-h frequency produced a progressive fall in testosterone concentrations, even though LH baselines were unchanged and LH pulse amplitudes increased transiently. FSH concentrations were unaltered during the 4-h regime. These results show that 1) the pulsatile pattern of LH and testosterone secretion in HPD rams can be reestablished by exogenous GnRH, 2) the magnitude of LH, FSH, and testosterone secretion were not fully restored to pre-HPD levels by the GnRH dose of 100 ng per pulse, and 3) changes in GnRH pulse frequency alone can influence both gonadotropin and testosterone secretion in the HPD model.     

Stimulation of a pulse of LH and reduction in PRL concentration by a physiologic dose of GnRH before, during, and after luteolysis in heifers

A single physiologic dose (5.0 μg) of GnRH was given to 9 heifers each day (Hour 0) beginning on Day 15 postovulation until regression of the corpus luteum. Blood samples were taken each day for Hours -3, -2, -1, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Based on daily progesterone concentrations, data were grouped into phases of before (n=4), during (n=8), and after (n=7) luteolysis. The number of LH pulses with a peak at pretreatment Hours -2 or -1 (0.35 ± 0.12 pulses/sampling session) was less (P<0.0001) than for a pulse peak at posttreatment Hours 1 or 2 (1.0 ± 0.0 pulses/session). The characteristics and effects of LH pulses on progesterone and estradiol were similar between natural (pretreatment) and primarily induced (posttreatment) LH pulses. The same dose of GnRH stimulated an LH pulse with greater (P<0.05) amplitude after luteolysis than during luteolysis. Concentrations of PRL and number and prominence of PRL pulses decreased (P<0.05) between Hours 0 and 2 within each of the phases of before, during, and after luteolysis. The hypothesis that a physiologic dose of GnRH increases the concentration of PRL was not supported; instead, GnRH reduced the concentration of PRL. Results supported the hypotheses that an appropriate dose of GnRH stimulates an LH pulse during luteolysis that is similar to a natural pulse in characteristics and in the effects on progesterone and estradiol.     

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe: relationship of frequency of LH pulses to day length and response to estradiol negative feedback

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes were examined over the course of 2 yr in relation to annual changes in environmental photoperiod, shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback control of LH secretion, and timing of the breeding season. Under natural environmental conditions, the frequency of LH pulses in individual ovariectomized ewes changed gradually and in close association with the annual cycle of day length. As days became shorter in late summer and autumn, LH pulse frequency increased; conversely, as day length increased in late winter and spring, frequency declined. Under artificial conditions in which ovariectomized ewes were exposed to different photoperiods, a similar inverse relationship was observed between day length and LH pulse frequency. The seasonal changes in frequency of LH pulses in ovariectomized ewes, although symmetric with the annual photoperiodic cycle, were not temporally coupled to the dramatic shifts in response to estradiol feedback inhibition of LH secretion at the transitions between breeding season and anestrus. The feedback shifts occurred abruptly and at times when LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes was at, or near, the annual maximum or minimum. The tight coupling between LH pulse frequency and photoperiod leads to the conclusion that there is a photoperiodic drive to the LH pulse-generating system of the ewe. The temporal dissociation between changes in this photoperiodic drive and the seasonal shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback support the hypothesis that the neuroendocrine basis for these two phenomena is not one and the same.     

Separate neural systems mediate the steroid-dependent and steroid-independent suppression of tonic luteinizing hormone secretion in the anestrous ewe

In the ewe, two types of seasonal fluctuations in secretion of tonic luteinizing hormone (LH) have been described: a steroid-dependent change whereby estradiol gains the capacity to suppress LH pulse frequency in anestrus, and a steroid-independent decrease in pulse frequency in ovariectomized animals during anestrus. We have proposed that the former reflects activation, in anestrus, of estradiol-sensitive catecholaminergic neurons that inhibit gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Three results reported here support this hypothesis: dopaminergic (pimozide) and alpha-adrenergic (phenoxybenzamine) antagonists increased LH in intact anestrous ewes without altering pituitary responses to GnRH; other dopaminergic (fluphenazine) and alpha-adrenergic (dibenamine) antagonists also increased LH in anestrus; agonists for dopaminergic (apomorphine) and alpha-adrenergic (clonidine) receptors suppressed LH secretion in both seasons, suggesting that the appropriate receptors are present in breeding-season ewes. In contrast, catecholamines do not appear to mediate the steroid-independent suppression of pulse frequency; neither pimozide nor phenoxybenzamine increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes during anestrus. When antagonists for 6 other neurotransmitter receptors (muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic, GABAnergic, serotonergic, opioid, and beta-adrenergic) were tested in anestrus, only cyproheptadine, the serotonergic antagonist, increased pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes. Cyproheptadine had no effect on frequency during the breeding season. On the basis of these results, we propose that the steroid-dependent and -independent actions of anestrous photoperiod occur via catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons, respectively.     

Effect of photoperiod on LH, FSH and prolactin patterns in ovariectomized oestradiol-treated heifers

Angus and Angus crossbred heifers were ovariectomized, treated with oestradiol implants and randomly assigned to the natural photoperiod of fall to spring for 43 degrees N latitude or extra light simulating the photoperiod of spring to fall. Weekly blood samples were taken for 6 months (fall to spring equinox). All heifers were cannulated every 4 weeks and blood samples were taken for 4 h at 15-min intervals. Sera were assayed for LH, FSH, prolactin and oestradiol. In samples taken weekly, serum LH and FSH concentrations were higher while serum prolactin was lower in heifers exposed to natural photoperiod. There was a photoperiod X time interaction for both FSH and prolactin with concentrations diverging as photoperiod diverged. Circulating concentrations of oestradiol were not different between groups. In samples taken every 4 weeks at 15-min intervals, baseline concentrations of LH and FSH and LH pulse amplitude were higher while prolactin pulse frequency was lower in heifers exposed to natural photoperiod. There was a photoperiod X time interaction for each of these pulsatile characteristics. The correlation between LH and prolactin concentrations estimated from the 15-min samples differed between the two photoperiod treatment groups. The pooled correlation coefficient (r) was -0.12 under natural photoperiod and +0.50 under extra light. There was also a photoperiod X time interaction with negative correlations occurring when photoperiod was decreasing and positive correlations occurring when photoperiod was increasing. These results support the hypothesis that photoperiod alters serum concentrations of LH, FSH and prolactin in cattle.     

Differential regulation of gonadotropin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in ewes

Changes in the frequency of GnRH and LH pulses have been shown to occur between the luteal and preovulatory periods in the ovine estrous cycle. We examined the effect of these different frequencies of GnRH pulses on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH subunit mRNAs. Eighteen ovariectomized ewes were implanted with progesterone to eliminate endogenous GnRH release during the nonbreeding season. These animals then received 3 ng/kg body weight GnRH in frequencies of once every 4, 1, or 0.5 h for 4 days. These frequencies represent those observed during the luteal and follicular phases, and the preovulatory LH and FSH surge of the ovine estrous cycle, respectively. On day 4, the ewes were killed and their anterior pituitary glands were removed for measurements of pituitary LH, FSH, and their subunit mRNAs. Pituitary content of LH and FSH, as assessed by RIA, did not change (P greater than 0.10) in response to the three different GnRH pulse frequencies. However, subunit mRNA concentrations, assessed by solution hybridization assays and expressed as femtomoles per mg total RNA, did change as a result of different GnRH frequencies. alpha mRNA concentrations were higher (P less than 0.05) when the GnRH pulse frequency was 1/0.5 h and 1 h, whereas LH beta and FSH beta mRNA concentrations were maximal (P less than 0.05) only at a pulse frequency of 1/h. Additionally, pituitary LH and FSH secretory response to GnRH on day 4 was maximal (P = 0.05) when the pulse infusion was 1/h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Changes in LH pulse frequency and serum progesterone concentrations during the transition to breeding season in ewes

To characterize the changes in LH pulse frequency during the transition to breeding season. LH pulse patterns and serum progesterone profiles were determined in 8 intact ewes from mid-anoestrus to the early breeding season. Overall, 8 increases in LH pulse frequency were observed and these were restricted to 5 ewes. Of the 8 increases, 7 occurred during the 4 weeks before the first cycle, 5 of them within 1 week after a pulse frequency typical of anoestrus (0-2 per 8 h). Six of them occurred less than 1 week before either a full-length luteal phase (n = 2) or a 1-3-day increment in progesterone (n = 4). Seven of these brief progesterone increases were observed in 6 ewes, 5 of them immediately preceding the first full-length luteal phase. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the seasonal decrease in response to oestradiol negative feedback at the beginning of the breeding season causes an increase in GnRH, and thereby LH pulse frequency. In addition, they demonstrate that the first increase in tonic LH secretion occurs in less than 1 week and, in most ewes, initiates either the first full-length cycle or a transient increase in progesterone, the latter occurring more often.