Structural changes in RepA,a plasmid replication initiator,upon binding to origin DNA

RepA protein is the DNA replication initiator of the Pseudomonas plasmid pPS10. RepA dimers bind to an inversely repeated operator sequence in repA promoter, thus repressing its own synthesis, whereas monomers bind to four directly repeated sequences (iterons) to initiate DNA replication. We had proposed previously that RepA is composed of two winged-helix (WH) domains, a structural unit also present in eukaryotic and archaeal initiators. To bind to the whole iteron sequence through both domains, RepA should couple monomerization to a conformational change in the N-terminal WH, which includes a leucine zipper-like sequence motif. We show for the first time that, by itself, binding to iteron DNA in vitro dissociates RepA dimers into monomers and alters RepA conformation, suggesting an allosteric effect. Furthermore, we also show that similar changes in RepA are promoted by mutations that substitute two Leu residues of the putative leucine zipper by Ala, destabilizing the hydrophobic core of the first WH. We propose that this mutant (RepA-2L2A) resembles a transient folding intermediate in the pathway leading to active monomers. These findings, together with the known activation of other Rep-type proteins by chaperones, are relevant to understand the molecular basis of plasmid DNA replication initiation.     

Protein domains and conformational changes in the activation of RepA, a DNA replication initiator.

RepA is the DNA replication initiator protein of the Pseudomonas plasmid pPS10. RepA has a dual function: as a dimer, it binds to an inversely-repeated sequence acting as a repressor of its own synthesis; as a monomer, RepA binds to four directly-repeated sequences to constitute a specialized nucleoprotein complex responsible for the initiation of DNA replication. We have previously shown that a Leucine Zipper-like motif (LZ) at the N-terminus of RepA is responsible for protein dimerization. In this paper we characterize the existence in RepA of two protein globular domains C-terminal to the LZ. We propose that dissociation of RepA dimers into monomers results in a conformational change from a compact arrangement of both domains, competent for binding to the operator, to an extended species that is suited for iteron binding. This model establishes the structural basis for the activation of DNA replication initiators in plasmids from Gram-negative bacteria.     

Fluorescence studies of the replication initiator protein RepA in complex with operator and iteron sequences and free in solution

RepA, the replication initiator protein from the Pseudomonas plasmid pPS10, regulates plasmid replication and copy number. It is capable of autorepression, in which case it binds as a dimer to the inverted repeat operator sequence preceding its own gene. RepA initiates plasmid replication by binding as a monomer to a series of four adjacent iterons, which contain the same half-repeat as found in the operator sequence. RepA contains two domains, one of which binds specifically to the half-repeat. The other is the dimerization domain, which is involved in protein-protein interactions in the dimeric RepA-operon complex, but which actually binds DNA in the monomeric RepA-iteron complex. Here, detailed fluorescence studies on RepA and an N-(iodoacetyl)aminoethyl-8-naphthylamine-1-sulfonic acid-labeled single-cysteine mutant of RepA (Cys160) are described. Using time-resolved fluorescence depolarization measurements, the global rotational correlation times of RepA free in solution and bound to the operator and to two distinct iteron dsDNA oligonucleotides were determined. These provide indications that, in addition to the monomeric RepA-iteron complex, a stable dimeric RepA-iteron complex can also exist. Further, F?rster resonance energy transfer between Trp94, located in the dimerization domain, and N-(iodoacetyl)aminoethyl-8-naphthylamine-1-sulfonic acid-Cys160, located on the DNA-binding domain, is observed and used to estimate the distance between the two fluorophores. This distance may serve as an indicator of the orientation between both domains in the unbound protein and RepA bound to the various cognate DNA sequences. No major change in distance is observed and this is taken as evidence for little to no re-orientation of both domains upon complex formation.     

Chaperone-mediated reduction of RepA dimerization is associated with RepA conformational change

RepA, the initiator protein of plasmid P1, binds to multiple sites (iterons) in the origin. The binding normally requires participation of chaperones, DnaJ, DnaK and GrpE. When purified, RepA appears dimeric and is inactive in iteron binding. On reaction with chaperones, a species active in iteron binding is formed and found to be monomeric. To test whether the chaperones can reduce dimerization, RepA was used to replace the dimerization domain of the λ repressor. The hybrid protein repressed the λ operator efficiently, indicating that RepA can dimerize in vivo . A further increase in repressor activity was seen in dnaJ mutant cells. These results are consistent with a chaperone-mediated reduction of RepA dimerization. We also found that RepA mutants defective in dimerization still depend on DnaJ for iteron binding. Conversely, RepA mutants that no longer require chaperones for iteron binding remain dimerization proficient. These results indicate that the chaperone dependence of RepA activity is not solely owing to RepA dimerization. Our results are most simply explained by a chaperone-mediated conformational change in RepA protomer that activates iteron binding. This conformational change also results in reduced RepA dimerization.     

Binding modes of the initiator and inhibitor forms of the replication protein pi to the gamma ori iteron of plasmid R6K

Discerning the interactions between initiator protein and the origin of replication should provide insights into the mechanism of DNA replication initiation. In the gamma origin of plasmid R6K, the Rep protein, pi, is distinctive in that it can bind the seven 22-bp iterons in two forms; pi monomers activate replication, whereas pi dimers act as inhibitors. In this work, we used wild type and variants of the pi protein with altered monomer/dimer ratios to study iteron/pi interactions. High resolution contact mapping was conducted using multiple techniques (missing base contact probing, methylation protection, base modification, and hydroxyl radical footprinting), and the electrophoretic separation of nucleoprotein complexes allowed us to discriminate between contact patterns produced by pi monomers and dimers. We also isolated iteron mutants that affected the binding of pi monomers (only) or both monomers and dimers. The mutational studies and footprinting analyses revealed that, when binding DNA, pi monomers interact with nucleotides spanning the entire length of the iteron. In contrast, pi dimers interact with only the left half of the iteron; however, the retained interactions are strikingly similar to those seen with monomers. These results support a model in which Rep protein dimerization disturbs one of two DNA binding domains important for monomer/iteron interaction; the dimer/iteron interaction utilizes only one DNA binding domain.     

Mechanism of origin activation by monomers of R6K-encoded pi protein

One recurring theme in plasmid duplication is the recognition of the origin of replication (ori) by specific Rep proteins that bind to DNA sequences called iterons. For plasmid R6K, this process involves a complex interplay between monomers and dimers of the Rep protein, pi, with seven tandem iterons of gamma ori. Remarkably, both pi monomers and pi dimers can bind to iterons, a new paradigm in replication control. Dimers, the predominant form in the cell, inhibit replication, while monomers facilitate open complex formation and activate the ori. Here, we investigate a mechanism by which pi monomers out-compete pi dimers for iteron binding, and in so doing activate the ori. With an in vivo plasmid incompatibility assay, we find that pi monomers bind cooperatively to two adjacent iterons. Cooperative binding is eliminated by insertion of a half-helical turn between two iterons but is diminished only slightly by insertion of a full helical turn between two iterons. These studies show also that pi bound to a consensus site promotes occupancy of an adjacent mutated site, another hallmark of cooperative interactions. pi monomer/iteron interactions were quantified using a monomer-biased pi variant in vitro with the same collection of two-iteron constructs. The cooperativity coefficients mirror the plasmid incompatibility results for each construct tested. pi dimer/iteron interactions were quantified with a dimer-biased mutant in vitro and it was found that pi dimers bind with negligible cooperativity to two tandem iterons.     

Replication of Enterococcus faecalis pheromone-responding plasmid pAD1: location of the minimal replicon and oriV site and RepA involvement in initiation of replication

The hemolysin-determining plasmid pAD1 is a member of a widely disseminated family of highly conjugative elements commonly present in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. The determinants repA, repB, and repC, as well as adjacent iteron sequences, are believed to play important roles in pAD1 replication and maintenance. The repA gene encodes an initiator protein, whereas repB and repC encode proteins related to stability and copy number. The present study focuses specifically on repA and identifies a replication origin (oriV) within a central region of the repA determinant. A small segment of repA carrying oriV was able to support replication in cis of a plasmid vector otherwise unable to replicate, if an intact RepA was supplied in trans. We demonstrate that under conditions in which RepA is expressed from an artificial promoter, a segment of DNA carrying only repA is sufficient for stable replication in E. faecalis. We also show that RepA binds specifically to oriV DNA at several sites containing inverted repeat sequences (i.e., IR-1) and nonspecifically to single-stranded DNA, and related genetic analyses confirm that these sequences play an important role in replication. Finally, we reveal a relationship between the internal structure of RepA and its ability to recognize oriV. An in-frame deletion within repA resulting in loss of 105 nucleotides, including at least part of oriV, did not eliminate the ability of the altered RepA protein to initiate replication using an intact origin provided in trans. The relationship of RepA to other known initiator proteins is also discussed.     

Binding of sulphonated indigo derivatives to RepA-WH1 inhibits DNA-induced protein amyloidogenesis

The quest for inducers and inhibitors of protein amyloidogenesis is of utmost interest, since they are key tools to understand the molecular bases of proteinopathies such as Alzheimer, Parkinson, Huntington and Creutzfeldt–Jakob diseases. It is also expected that such molecules could lead to valid therapeutic agents. In common with the mammalian prion protein (PrP), the N-terminal Winged-Helix (WH1) domain of the pPS10 plasmid replication protein (RepA) assembles in vitro into a variety of amyloid nanostructures upon binding to different specific dsDNA sequences. Here we show that di- (S2) and tetra-sulphonated (S4) derivatives of indigo stain dock at the DNA recognition interface in the RepA-WH1 dimer. They compete binding of RepA to its natural target dsDNA repeats, found at the repA operator and at the origin of replication of the plasmid. Calorimetry points to the existence of a major site, with micromolar affinity, for S4-indigo in RepA-WH1 dimers. As revealed by electron microscopy, in the presence of inducer dsDNA, both S2/S4 stains inhibit the assembly of RepA-WH1 into fibres. These results validate the concept that DNA can promote protein assembly into amyloids and reveal that the binding sites of effector molecules can be targeted to inhibit amyloidogenesis.     

Structural insight into a molecular switch in tandem winged-helix motifs from elongation factor SelB

Elongation factor SelB is responsible for co-translational incorporation of selenocysteine (Sec) into proteins. The UGA stop codon is recoded as a Sec codon in the presence of a downstream mRNA hairpin. In prokaryotes, in addition to the EF-Tu-like N-terminal domains, a C-terminal extension containing four tandem winged-helix motifs (WH1-4) recognizes the mRNA hairpin. The 2.3-A resolution crystal structure of the Escherichia coli WH3/4 domains bound to mRNA with mutagenesis data reveal that the two WH motifs use the same structural elements to bind RNA. The structure together with the 2.6-A resolution structure of the WH1-4 domains from Moorella thermoacetica bound to RNA revealed that a salt bridge connecting WH2 to WH3 modules is disrupted upon mRNA binding. The results provide a structural basis for the molecular switch that may allow communication between tRNA and mRNA binding sites and illustrate how RNA acts as an activator of the switch. The structures show that tandem WH motifs not only provide an excellent scaffold for RNA binding but can also have an active role in the function of protein-RNA complexes.     

A model for the LexA repressor DNA complex

A structural model for the interaction of the LexA repressor DNA binding domain (DBD) with operator DNA is derived by means of Monte Carlo docking. Protein–DNA complexes were generated by docking the LexA repressor DBD NMR solution structure onto both rigid and bent B-DNA structures while giving energy bonuses for contacts in agreement with experimental data. In the resulting complexes, helix III of the LexA repressor DBD is located in the major groove of the DNA and residues Asn-41, Glu-44, and Glu-45 form specific hydrogen bonds with bases of the CTGT DNA sequence. Ser-39, Ala-42, and Asn-41 are involved in a hydrophobic interaction with the methyl group of the first thymine base. Residues in the loop region connecting the two β-sheet strands are involved in nonspecific contacts near the dyad axis of the operator. The contacts observed in the docked complexes cover the entire consensus CTGT half-site DNA operator, thus explaining the specificity of the LexA repressor for such sequences. In addition, a large number of nonspecific interactions between protein and DNA is observed. The agreement between the derived model for the LexA repressor DBD/DNA complex and experimental biochemical results is discussed. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Plasmid P1 RepA is homologous to the F plasmid RepE class of initiators

DNA replication of plasmid P1 requires a plasmid-encoded origin DNA-binding protein, RepA. RepA is an inactive dimer and is converted by molecular chaperones into an active monomer that binds RepA binding sites. Although the sequence of RepA is not homologous to that of F plasmid RepE, we found by using fold-recognition programs that RepA shares structural homology with RepE and built a model based on the RepE crystal structure. We constructed mutants in the two predicted DNA binding domains to test the model. As expected, the mutants were defective in P1 DNA binding. The model predicted that RepA binds the first half of the binding site through interactions with the C-terminal DNA binding domain and the second half through interactions with the N-terminal domain. The experiments supported the prediction. The model was further supported by the observation that mutants defective in dimerization map to the predicted subunit interface region, based on the crystal structure of pPS10 RepA, a RepE family member. These results suggest P1 RepA is structurally homologous to plasmid initiators, including those of F, R6K, pSC101, pCU1, pPS10, pFA3, pGSH500, Rts1, RepHI1B, RepFIB, and RSF1010.     

A DNA‐promoted amyloid proteinopathy in Escherichia coli

Protein amyloids arise from the conformational conversion and assembly of a soluble protein into fibrilar aggregates with a crossed β‐sheet backbone. Amyloid aggregates are able to replicate by acting as a template for the structural transformation and accretion of further protein molecules. In physicochemical terms, amyloids arguably constitute the simplest self‐replicative macromolecular assemblies. Similarly to the mammalian proteins PrP and α‐synuclein, the winged‐helix dimerization (WH1) domain of the bacterial, plasmid‐encoded protein RepA can assemble into amyloid fibres upon binding to DNA in vitro. Here we report that a hyper‐amyloidogenic functional variant (A31V) of RepA, fused to a red fluorescent protein, causes an amyloid proteinopathy in Escherichia coli with the following features: (i) in the presence of multiple copies of the specific DNA sequence opsp, WH1(A31V) accumulates as cytoplasmatic inclusions segregated from the nucleoid; (ii) such aggregates are amyloid in nature; (iii) bacteria carrying the amyloid inclusions age, exhibiting a fivefold expanded generation time; (iv) before cytokinesis, small inclusions are assembled de novo and transferred to the daughter cells, in which transmission failures cure amyloidosis; and (v) in the absence of inducer DNA, purified cellular WH1(A31V) inclusions seed amyloid fibre growth in vitro from the soluble protein. RepA‐WH1 is a suitable bacterial model system for amyloid proteinopathies.     

Two enhancer elements for DNA replication of pSC101, par and a palindromic binding sequence of the Rep protein.

The minimal replication origin (ori) of the plasmid pSC101 has been previously defined as an approximately 220-bp region by using plasmids defective in the par region, which is a cis-acting determinant of plasmid stability. This ori region contains the DnaA binding sequence, three repeated sequences (iterons), and an inverted repeat (IR) element (IR-1), one of the binding sites of an initiator protein, Rep (or RepA). In the present study, we show that plasmids containing par can replicate at a nearly normal copy number in the absence of IR-1 but still require a region (the downstream region) between the third iteron and IR-1. Because par is dispensable in plasmids retaining IR-1, par and IR-1 can compensate each other for efficient replication. The region from the DnaA box to the downstream region can support DNA replication at a reduced frequency, and it is designated "core-ori." Addition of either IR-1 or par to core-ori increases the copy number of the plasmid up to a nearly normal level. However, the IR-1 element must be located downstream of the third iteron (or upstream of the rep gene) to enhance replication of the plasmid, while the par region, to which DNA gyrase can bind, functions optimally regardless of its location. Furthermore, the enhancer activity of IR-1 is dependent on the helical phase of the DNA double helix, suggesting that the Rep protein bound to IR-1 stimulates the activation of ori via its interaction with another factor or factors capable of binding to individual loci within ori.     

Multiple conformations of the cytidine repressor DNA-binding domain coalesce to one upon recognition of a specific DNA surface

The cytidine repressor (CytR) is a member of the LacR family of bacterial repressors with distinct functional features. The Escherichia coli CytR regulon comprises nine operons whose palindromic operators vary in both sequence and, most significantly, spacing between the recognition half-sites. This suggests a strong likelihood that protein folding would be coupled to DNA binding as a mechanism to accommodate the variety of different operator architectures to which CytR is targeted. Such coupling is a common feature of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, including the LacR family repressors; however, there are no significant structural rearrangements upon DNA binding within the three-helix DNA-binding domains (DBDs) studied to date. We used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterize the CytR DBD free in solution and to determine the high-resolution structure of a CytR DBD monomer bound specifically to one DNA half-site of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) operator. We find that the free DBD populates multiple distinct conformations distinguished by up to four sets of NMR peaks per residue. This structural heterogeneity is previously unknown in the LacR family. These stable structures coalesce into a single, more stable udp-bound form that features a three-helix bundle containing a canonical helix-turn-helix motif. However, this structure differs from all other LacR family members whose structures are known with regard to the packing of the helices and consequently their relative orientations. Aspects of CytR activity are unique among repressors; we identify here structural properties that are also distinct and that might underlie the different functional properties.     

Molecular interactions of a replication initiator protein, RepA, with the replication origin of the enterococcal plasmid p703/5

We previously identified the origin of replication of p703/5, a small cryptic plasmid from the KBL703 strain of Enterococcus faecalis. The origin of replication contains putative regulatory cis-elements required for replication and a replication initiator (RepA) gene. The replicon of p703/5 is similar in its structural organization to theta-type plasmids, and RepA is homologous to a family of Rep proteins identified in several plasmids from Gram-positive bacteria. Here, we report molecular interactions between RepA and the replication origin of p703/5. DNase I footprinting using recombinant RepA together with electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed the binding of RepA to the replication origin of p703/5 via iterons and an inverted repeat. We also demonstrated the formation of RepA dimers and the different binding of RepA to the iteron and the inverted repeat using gel filtration chromatographic analysis, a chemical crosslinking assay, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays in the presence of guanidine hydrochloride. Our results suggest that RepA plays a regulatory role in the replication of the enterococcal plasmid p703/5 via mechanisms similar to those of typical iteron-carrying theta-type plasmids.     

Dimerization of the core domain of the p53 family: A computational study

Computational models reveal the structural origins of cooperativity in the association of the DNA binding domains (DBD) of p53 (and its two homologues p63 and p73) with consensus DNA. In agreement with experiments they show that cooperativity, as defined by sequential binding of monomers to DNA is strong for p53 and weak for homologues p63 and p73. Computations also suggest that cooperativity can arise from the dimerization of the DBD prior to binding the DNA for all 3 family members. Dimerization between the DBDs is driven by packing interactions originating in residues of helix H1 and loop L3, while DNA binding itself is dominated by local and global electrostatics. Calculations further suggest that low affinity oligomerization of the p53 DBD can precede the oligomerization of the tetramerization domain (TD). During synthesis of multiple chains on the polysome, this may increase fidelity by reducing the possibility of the highly hydrophobic TD from nonspecific aggregation. Mutations have been suggested to test these findings.