Combination of active specific immunotherapy or adoptive antibody or lymphocyte immunotherapy with chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer

Successful treatment of cancer patients with a combination of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and chemotherapeutic drugs has spawned various other forms of additional combination therapies, including vaccines or adoptive lymphocyte transfer combined with chemotherapeutics. These therapies were effective against established tumors in animal models and showed promising results in initial clinical trials in cancer patients, awaiting testing in larger randomized controlled studies. Although combination between immunotherapy and chemotherapy has long been viewed as incompatible as chemotherapy, especially in high doses meant to increase anti-tumor efficacy, has induced immunosuppression, various mechanisms may explain the reported synergistic effects of the two types of therapies. Thus direct effects of chemotherapy on tumor or host environment, such as induction of tumor cell death, elimination of regulatory T cells, and/or enhancement of tumor cell sensitivity to lysis by CTL may account for enhancement of immunotherapy by chemotherapy. Furthermore, induction of lymphopenia by chemotherapy has increased the efficacy of adoptive lymphocyte transfer in cancer patients. On the other hand, immunotherapy may directly modulate the tumor’s sensitivity to chemotherapy. Thus, anti-tumor mAb can increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs and patients treated first with immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy showed higher clinical response rates than patients that had received chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, combination of active specific immunotherapy or adoptive mAb or lymphocyte immunotherapy with chemotherapy has great potential for the treatment of cancer patients which needs to be confirmed in larger controlled and randomized Phase III trials.     

Immune therapy of melanoma: Overview of therapeutic vaccines

Melanoma is the most serious type of skin cancer which develops from the occurrence of genetic mutations in the melanocytes. Based on the features of melanoma tumors such as location, genetic profile and stage, there are several therapeutic strategies including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, because of the appearance resistance mechanisms, the efficiency of these treatments strategies may be reduced. It has been demonstrated that therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can improve the efficiency of melanoma therapies. Recently, several mAbs, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, were approved for the immunotherapy of melanoma. The antibodies inhibit immune checkpoint receptors such as CTL4 and pd-1. Another therapeutic strategy for the treatment of melanoma is cancer vaccines, which improve clinical outcomes in patients. The combination therapy using antibodies and gene vaccine give us a new perspective in the treatment of melanoma patients. Herein, we present the recent progressions in the melanoma immunotherapy, especially dendritic cells mRNA vaccines by reviewing recent literature.     

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the industrialized world. Most cancer patients are treated by a combination of surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Whereas the primary tumor can, in most cases, be efficiently treated by a combination of these standard therapies, preventing the metastatic spread of the disease through disseminated tumor cells is often not effective. The eradication of disseminated tumor cells present in the blood circulation and micro-metastases in distant organs therefore represents another promising approach in cancer immunotherapy. Main strategies of cancer immunotherapy aim at exploiting the therapeutic potential of tumor-specific antibodies and cellular immune effector mechanisms. Whereas passive antibody therapy relies on the repeated application of large quantities of tumor antigen-specific antibodies, active immunotherapy aims at the generation of a tumor-specific immune response combining both humoral and cytotoxic T cell effector mechanisms by the host's immune system following vaccination. In the first part of this review, concurrent developments in active and passive cancer immunotherapy are discussed. In the second part, the various approaches for the production of optimized monoclonal antibodies used for anti-cancer vaccination are summarized.     

Eradication of established tumors in mice by a combination antibody-based therapy

Tumor-cell apoptosis is the basis of many cancer therapies, and tumor-specific T cells are the principal effectors of successful antitumor immunotherapies. Here we show that induction of tumor-cell apoptosis by an agonistic monoclonal antibody to DR5, the apoptosis-inducing receptor for TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), combined with T-cell activation by agonistic monoclonal antibodies to the costimulatory molecules CD40 and CD137, potently and rapidly stimulated tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells capable of eradicating preestablished tumors. Primary fibrosarcomas initiated with the carcinogen 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA), multiorgan metastases and a primary tumor containing as many as 90% tumor cells resistant to DR5-specific monoclonal antibody were rejected without apparent toxicity or induction of autoimmunity. This combination therapy of three monoclonal antibodies (trimAb) rapidly induced tumor-specific CD8+ T cells producing interferon (IFN)-gamma in the tumor-draining lymph node, consistent with a crucial requirement for CD8+ T cells and IFN-gamma in the tumor rejection process. These results in mice indicate that a rational monoclonal antibody-based therapy that both causes tumor-cell apoptosis through DR5 and activates T cells may be an effective strategy for cancer immunotherapy in humans.     

Combinations of anticancer drugs and immunotherapy

Immunotherapy (biological therapy) comprises such things as active specific immunotherapy ("cancer vaccines"), nonspecific immunostimulation with cytokines, and the inhibition of suppressor influences exerted or elicited by the tumor. Just as cancer chemotherapy began with the use of single agents and evolved into combination therapy, so immunotherapeutic agents have been combined with each other and with chemotherapy. The alkylating agent cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; CYC) has been used for many years to inhibit tumor-derived suppressor influences in rodents, and has been exploited for the same use in humans. Combinations of CYC and cancer vaccines such as autologous tumor cells, Melacine, large multivalent immunogen (LMI), and Theratope have been tested with some success in humans for more than a decade. In this use, the CYC is a biological response modifier rather than an antitumor agent, intended to inhibit suppressor influences. CYC and low- to moderate-dose IL-2 has also been a useful regimen in treating human melanomas. IL-2 is itself a useful component of combination immunotherapy, such as with melanoma peptide vaccines, or with interferon -2b, (IFN-), as a dual combination or part of a biochemotherapy regimen. Several different combinations of drugs and biological agents have been used as biochemotherapy for melanoma, but although there are higher response (regression) rates the long-range survival benefits have been marginal, not justifying the severe toxicity. Combinations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and IFN- or levamisole have had efficacy in colon and head and neck cancers, but here the biological agents have been biochemical modulators, not immunotherapy. Although experience with combinations of monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy has been limited, it appears that trastuzumab (Herceptin) potentiates antitumor therapy in breast cancer but also increases the cardiotoxicity of those regimens.This article forms part of the Symposium in Writing on "Cellular immunity for cancer chemoimmunotherapy" in Volume 52 (2003)     

Targeting the immune system: novel therapeutic approaches in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the overall survival rates for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have not changed over the last decades. Clearly, novel therapeutic strategies are needed for this cancer, which is highly immunosuppressive. Therefore, biologic therapies able to induce and/or up-regulate antitumor immune responses could represent a complementary approach to conventional treatments. Because patients with SCCHN are frequently immunocompromised due to the elimination or dysfunction of critical effector cells of the immune system, it might be necessary to restore these immune functions to allow for the generation of more effective antitumor host responses. Simultaneously, to prevent tumor escape, it might be necessary to alter attributes of the malignant cells. The present review summarizes recent advances in the field of immunotherapy of SCCHN, including techniques of nonspecific immune stimulation, the use of monoclonal antibodies, advances in adoptive immunotherapy and genetic engineering, as well as anticancer vaccines. These biologic therapies, alone or in combination with conventional treatment, are likely to develop into useful future treatment options for patients with SCCHN.     

Combined modality immunotherapy and chemotherapy: a new perspective

The results of recent clinical trials have demonstrated that cancer vaccines continue to struggle to achieve tangible clinical benefits as monotherapy. Tumor-induced abnormalities in the immune system hamper anti-tumor T cell responses limiting the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy. Recently, evidence has been mounting to suggest that immunotherapy has the possibility of achieving better success when used in combination with conventional chemotherapy. In clinical trials, immune responses elicited by cancer vaccines appear to augment the effectiveness of subsequent conventional cancer therapies.     

Pilot study of a novel combination of two therapeutic vaccines in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Cancer vaccines contain tumor antigens in a pro-inflammatory context with the purpose to generate potent antitumor immune responses. However, tumor cells develop different immunosuppressive mechanisms that limit the effectiveness of an anticancer immune response. Therefore, therapeutic vaccine treatment alone is usually not sufficient to generate tumor regression or survival improvement, especially in the advanced disease scenario in which most clinical studies have been conducted. Combining cancer vaccines with different anticancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and other immunotherapeutic agents has had different levels of success. However, the combination of cancer vaccines with different mechanisms of action has not been explored in clinical trials. To address this issue, the current review summarizes the main clinical and immunological results obtained with two different therapeutic vaccines used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients, inducing an immune response against epidermal growth factor (CIMAvax-EGF) and NGcGM3 ganglioside (racotumomab). We also discuss preliminary findings obtained in a trial of combination of these two vaccines and future challenges with these therapies.     

Combined blockade of TIM-3 and TIM-4 augments cancer vaccine efficacy against established melanomas

Cancer vaccines have been developed to instruct the endogenous immune responses to autologous tumors and to generate durable clinical responses. However, the therapeutic benefits of cancer vaccines remain insufficient due to the multiple immunosuppressive signals delivered by tumors. Thus, to improve the clinical efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, it is important to develop new modalities to overcome immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments and elicit effective antitumor immune responses. In this study, we show that novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specifically targeting either T cell immunoglobulin mucin protein-3 (TIM-3) or T cell immunoglobulin mucin protein-4 (TIM-4) enhance the therapeutic effects of vaccination against established B16 murine melanomas. This is true for vaccination with irradiated B16 melanoma cells engineered to express the flt3 ligand gene (FVAX). More importantly, combining anti-TIM-3 and anti-TIM-4 mAbs markedly increased vaccine-induced antitumor responses against established B16 melanoma. TIM-3 blockade mainly stimulated antitumor effector activities via natural killer cell-dependent mechanisms, while CD8⁺ T cells served as the main effectors induced by anti-TIM-4 mAb. Our findings reveal that therapeutic manipulation of TIM-3 and TIM-4 may provide a novel strategy for improving the clinical efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.     

Platinum-based systematic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Due to the lack of definitive hormone receptors, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receive little clinical benefit from endocrine or molecular targeted therapies, leading to a highly aggressive disease with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. In the past decades, chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for TNBC, with taxane/anthracyclines as the representative regimen. However, increasing irreversible cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines and drug-resistance had to be noticed. Gradually, platinum-based chemotherapy has become a topic of interest for researchers. Based on the accumulating studies on platinum-containing regimens for TNBC patients, we will summarize the progress of relevant clinical trials focusing on platinum monotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) or in combination with other therapeutic modalities (e.g., other chemotherapeutic agents, molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy). To further evaluate patient response to platinum and screen for the optimal population to benefit from platinum, we will also analyze current potential biomarkers, such as breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TP53 family and other emerging indicators (e.g., intrinsic subtype, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) expression, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)).     

Vaccines for colorectal cancer: an update

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is known as the third most common and fourth leading cancer associated death worldwide. The occurrence of metastasis has remained as a critical challenge in CRC, so that distant metastasis (mostly to the liver) has been manifested in about 20%-25% of patients. Several screening approaches have introduced for detecting CRC in different stages particularly in early stages. The standard treatments for CRC are surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, in alone or combination. Immunotherapy is a set of novel approaches with the aim of remodeling the immune system battle with metastatic cancer cells, such as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors), adoptive cell transfer (ACT) and cancer vaccine. Cancer vaccines are designed to trigger the intense response of immune system to tumor-specific antigens. In two last decades, introduction of new cancer vaccines and designing several clinical trials with vaccine therapy, have been taken into consideration in colon cancer patients. This review will describe the treatment approaches with the special attention to vaccines applied to treat colorectal cancer.     

Augmentation of therapeutic effect of adoptive immunotherapy through a synergy between transferred killer cells and host's fresh lymphocytes]

Among several approaches to augment the therapeutic effect of adoptive immunotherapy, we focused the antitumor synergy between transferred killer cells and host's fresh lymphocytes. Immunotherapy models using murine tumors or clinical experiments revealed that preadministration of immunostimulator such as OK-432, followed by chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, can induce host's non-cytotoxic fresh lymphocytes that act synergistically with cultured killer cells against autologous tumor cells. Immuno-chemo-lymphocytotherapy (a sequential treatment with OK-432, chemotherapy and adoptive immunotherapy) is useful to treat the patients with advanced cancer even if the number of transferred lymphocytes is limited.     

Emerging concepts in designing next-generation multifunctional nanomedicine for cancer treatment

Nanotherapy has emerged as an improved anticancer therapeutic strategy to circumvent the harmful side effects of chemotherapy. It has been proven to be beneficial to offer multiple advantages, including their capacity to carry different therapeutic agents, longer circulation time and increased therapeutic index with reduced toxicity. Over time, nanotherapy evolved in terms of their designing strategies like geometry, size, composition or chemistry to circumvent the biological barriers. Multifunctional nanoscale materials are widely used as molecular transporter for delivering therapeutics and imaging agents. Nanomedicine involving multi-component chemotherapeutic drug-based combination therapy has been found to be an improved promising approach to increase the efficacy of cancer treatment. Next-generation nanomedicine has also utilized and combined immunotherapy to increase its therapeutic efficacy. It helps in targeting tumor immune response sparing the healthy systemic immune function. In this review, we have summarized the progress of nanotechnology in terms of nanoparticle designing and targeting cancer. We have also discussed its further applications in combination therapy and cancer immunotherapy. Integrating patient-specific proteomics and biomarker based information and harnessing clinically safe nanotechnology, the development of precision nanomedicine could revolutionize the effective cancer therapy.     

Cancer: novel therapeutic strategies that exploit the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/TRAIL receptor pathway

Cancer is a widespread disease, with half of all men and one-third of all women in the United States developing cancer during their lifetime. The efficacy of many cancer treatments including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy is due to their ability to induce tumor cell apoptosis. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is currently being developed as a cancer therapeutic since it selectively induces apoptosis in a variety of transformed cells, but not in most normal cells. Agonistic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for human death-inducing TRAIL receptors (DR4 or DR5) are also being actively pursued. Importantly, in experimental mice, synergistic anti-tumor effects have been observed with a combination treatment of agonistic mAb against DR5 together with either IL-21 or agonistic mAbs against CD40 and CD137. Together, these findings suggest that antibody-based therapies that cause tumor cell apoptosis and promote T cell memory or function may be effective in fighting cancer.     

Tumor-directed targeting of liposomes

Tumor-specific targeting is a critical goal in the research area of liposomal drug delivery. Identification of the specific interactions between ligands and target tumor cells is a principle prerequisite in achieving this goal. Generally, tumor cells aberrantly express tumor-associated antigens that can be utilized as appropriate target molecules. Monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens have been successfully adopted for targeting to various types of cancer cells. The incorporation of humanized monoclonal antibodies or single chain human antibodies, instead of rodent antibodies into immunoliposomes has resulted in better clinical applicability. Tumor-specific ligands other than monoclonal antibodies have also been investigated as in vivo tumor-directing molecules. However, the number of pre-clinical studies of anticancer treatments using tumor-specific liposomal drugs reporting successful targeting and enhanced therapeutic efficacy has been limited. Further refinement of tumor-specific interactions and liposomal formulations will be necessary for the application of the tumor-specific liposomal drug strategy for anticancer chemotherapy or gene therapy.     

Cancer vaccines as a therapeutic modality: the long trek

The development of cancer vaccines has been one of the several false dawns in which initial promising Phase I and Phase II clinical data have not been followed up with conclusive Phase III trials. In this review, we describe some of the successes and failures, and review the most likely reasons for Phase III failure, such as protocol changes, which are common between Phase II and III, and poorly defined patient groups. Nevertheless, significant survival results have been reported with autologous vaccines for colorectal, renal and, more recently, prostate cancer. In addition, it is becoming evident that immunotherapy is potentially synergistic with other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, which can reduce T-regulatory activity that inhibits the immune response to cancer vaccines. This potential for synergy should allow cancer vaccines to become part of the standard treatment regimen for many common tumours.This article is a symposium paper from the “Robert Baldwin Symposium: 50 years of Cancer Immunotherapy”, held in Nottingham, Great Britain, on 30 June 2005.     

Endpoints,patient selection,and biomarkers in the design of clinical trials for cancer vaccines

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are an emerging and potentially effective treatment modality. Cancer vaccines are usually very well tolerated, with minimal toxicity compared with chemotherapy. Unlike conventional cytotoxic therapies, immunotherapy does not result in immediate tumor shrinkage but may alter growth rate and thus prolong survival. Multiple randomized controlled trials of various immunotherapeutic agents have shown a delayed separation in Kaplan–Meier survival curves, with no evidence of clinical benefit within the first 6–12 months of vaccine treatment. Overall survival benefit is seen in patients with lower disease burden who are not expected to die within those initial 6–12 months. The concept of improved overall survival without marked initial tumor reduction represents a significant shift from the current paradigms established by standard cytotoxic therapies. Future clinical studies of therapeutic vaccines should enroll patients with either lower tumor burden, more indolent disease or both, and must seek to identify early markers of clinical benefit that may correlate with survival. Until then, improved overall survival is the only clear, discriminatory endpoint for therapeutic vaccines as monotherapies.     

Peptide‐based therapeutic cancer vaccine: Current trends in clinical application

The peptide‐based therapeutic cancer vaccines have attracted enormous attention in recent years as one of the effective treatments of tumour immunotherapy. Most of peptide‐based vaccines are based on epitope peptides stimulating CD8⁺ T cells or CD4⁺ T helper cells to target tumour‐associated antigens (TAAs) or tumour‐specific antigens (TSAs). Some adjuvants and nanomaterials have been exploited to optimize the efficiency of immune response of the epitope peptide to improve its clinical application. At present, numerous peptide‐based therapeutic cancer vaccines have been developed and achieved significant clinical benefits. Similarly, the combination of peptide‐based vaccines and other therapies has demonstrated a superior efficacy in improving anti‐cancer activity. We delve deeper into the choices of targets, design and screening of epitope peptides, clinical efficacy and adverse events of peptide‐based vaccines, and strategies combination of peptide‐based therapeutic cancer vaccines and other therapies. The review will provide a detailed overview and basis for future clinical application of peptide‐based therapeutic cancer vaccines.     

Re-purposing cancer therapeutics for breast cancer immunotherapy

After decades of work to develop immune-based therapies for cancer, the first drugs designed specifically to engage the host anti-tumor immune response for therapeutic benefit were recently approved for clinical use. Sipuleucel-T, a vaccine for advanced prostate cancer, and ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody that mitigates the negative impact of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 signaling on tumor immunity, provide a modest clinical benefit in some patients. The arrival of these drugs in the clinic is a significant advance that we can capitalize on for even better clinical outcomes. The strategic and scientifically rational integration of vaccines and other direct immunomodulators with standard cancer therapeutics should lead to therapeutic synergy and high rates of tumor rejection. This review focuses on the use of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and HER-2-specific monoclonal antibodies to dissect mechanisms of immune tolerance relevant to breast cancer patients and illustrates how appropriate preclinical models can powerfully inform clinical translation. The immune-modulating activity of targeted, pathway-specific, small molecule therapeutics is also discussed. Fully understanding how cancer drugs impact the immune system should lead to the ultimate personalized cancer medicine: effective combinatorial immunotherapy strategies that simultaneously target signaling pathways essential for tumor growth and progression, and systematically break multiple, distinct immune tolerance pathways to maximize tumor rejection and effect cure.     

Biological response modifiers in cancer

We have seen a surge in the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Biological response modifiers can act passively by enhancing the immunologic response to tumor cells or actively by altering the differentiation/growth of tumor cells. Active immunotherapy with cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) and interleukins (IL-2) is a form of nonspecific active immune stimulation. The use of IL-2 has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. Considerable success has been achieved with the use of immunotherapy, especially in the area of passive immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies--in particular, radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. In addition to the various monoclonal antibodies that have been used in clinical trials, other strategies such as the use of antiangiogenic agents and matrix metalloprotease inhibitors (MMPIs) have also met with some success. Recently, the FDA approved bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. This review also sheds light on the various angiogenesis inhibitors in clinical trials, the increasing use of thalidomide in cancer, and the upcoming potential cancer vaccines designed to activate cell-mediated immune responses against tumor antigens.