Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes

Mouse models are often used to study human genes because it is believed that the expression and function are similar for the majority of orthologous genes between the two species. However, recent comparisons of microarray data from thousands of orthologous human and mouse genes suggested rapid evolution of gene expression profiles under minimal or no selective constraint. These findings appear to contradict non-array-based observations from many individual genes and imply the uselessness of mouse models for studying human genes. Because absolute levels of gene expression are not comparable between species when the data are generated by species-specific microarrays, use of relative mRNA abundance among tissues (RA) is preferred to that of absolute expression signals. We thus reanalyze human and mouse genome-wide gene expression data generated by oligonucleotide microarrays. We show that the mean correlation coefficient among expression profiles detected by different probe sets of the same gene is only 0.38 for humans and 0.28 for mice, indicating that current measures of expression divergence are flawed because the large estimation error (discrepancy in expression signal detected by different probe sets of the same gene) is mistakenly included in the between-species divergence. When this error is subtracted, 84% of human-mouse orthologous gene pairs show significantly lower expression divergence than that of random gene pairs. In contrast to a previous finding, but consistent with the common sense, expression profiles of orthologous tissues between species are more similar to each other than to those of nonorthologous tissues. Furthermore, the evolutionary rate of expression divergence and that of coding sequence divergence are found to be weakly, but significantly positively correlated, when RA and the Euclidean distance are used to measure expression-profile divergence. These results highlight the importance of proper consideration of various estimation errors in comparing the microarray data between species.     

Correlation between sequence conservation of the 5' untranslated region and codon usage bias in Mus musculus genes

The codon adaptation index (CAI) values of all protein-coding sequences of the full-length cDNA libraries of Mus musculus were computed based on the RIKEN mouse full-length cDNA library. We have also computed the extent of consensus in flanking sequences of the initiator ATG codon based on the 'relative entropy' values of respective nucleotide positions (from -20 to +12 bp relative to the initiator ATG codon) for each group of genes classified by CAI values. With regard to the two nucleotides positions (-3 and +4) known to be highly conserved in Kozak's consensus sequence, a clear correlation between CAI values and relative entropy values was observed at position -3 but this was not significant at position +4, although a significant correlation was found at position -1 of the consensus sequence. Further, although no correlation was observed at any additional positions, relative entropy values were very high at positions -4, -6, and -8 in genes with high CAI values. These findings suggest that the extent of conservation in the flanking sequence of the initiator ATG codon including Kozak's consensus sequence was an important factor in modulation of the translation efficiency as well as synonymous codon usage bias particularly in highly expressed genes.     

Genetic differences between humans and great apes

The remarkable similarity among the genomes of humans and the African great apes could warrant their classification together as a single genus. However, whereas there are many similarities in the biology, life history, and behavior of humans and great apes, there are also many striking differences that need to be explained. The complete sequencing of the human genome creates an opportunity to ask which genes are involved in those differences. A logical approach would be to use the chimpanzee genome for comparison and the other great ape genomes for confirmation. Until such a great ape genome project can become reality, the next best approach must be educated guesses of where the genetic differences may lie and a careful analysis of differences that we do know about. Our group recently discovered a human-specific inactivating mutation in the CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase gene, which results in the loss of expression of a common mammalian cell-surface sugar throughout all cells in the human body. We are currently investigating the implications of this difference for a variety of issues relevant to humans, ranging from pathogen susceptibility to brain development. Evaluating the uniqueness of this finding has also led us to explore the existing literature on the broader issue of genetic differences between humans and great apes. The aim of this brief review is to consider a listing of currently known genetic differences between humans and great apes and to suggest avenues for future research. The differences reported between human and great ape genomes include cytogenetic differences, differences in the type and number of repetitive genomic DNA and transposable elements, abundance and distribution of endogenous retroviruses, the presence and extent of allelic polymorphisms, specific gene inactivation events, gene sequence differences, gene duplications, single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene expression differences, and messenger RNA splicing variations. Evaluation of the reported findings in all these categories indicates that the CMP-sialic hydroxylase mutation is the only one that has so far been shown to result in a global biochemical and structural difference between humans and great apes. Several of the other known genetic dissimilarities deserve more exploration at the functional level. Among the areas of focus for the future should be genes affecting development, mental maturation, reproductive biology, and other aspects of life history. The approaches taken should include both going from the genome up to the adaptive potential of the organisms and going from novel adaptive regimes down to the relevant repercussions in the genome. Also, as much as we desire a simple genetic explanation for the human phenomenon, it is much more probable that our evolution occurred in multiple genetic steps, many of which must have left detectable footprints in our genomes. Ultimately, we need to know the exact number of genetic steps, the order in which they occurred, and the temporal, spatial, environmental, and cultural contexts that determined their impact on human evolution.     

Evolutionary conservation between budding yeast and human kinetochores

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the correct assembly of kinetochores--complexes of centromeric DNA and proteins that link chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Studies on the kinetochore of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have revealed functionally novel components of the kinetochore and its regulatory complexes, some of which are highly conserved in humans.     

Evolutionary conservation and disease gene association of the human genes composing pseudogenes

Pseudogenes, the 'genomic fossils' present portrayal of evolutionary history of human genome. The human genes configuring pseudogenes are also now coming forth as important resources in the study of human protein evolution. In this communication, we explored evolutionary conservation of the genes forming pseudogenes over the genes lacking any pseudogene and delving deeper, we probed an evolutionary rate difference between the disease genes in the two groups. We illustrated this differential evolutionary pattern by gene expressivity, number of regulatory miRNA targeting per gene, abundance of protein complex forming genes and lesser percentage of protein intrinsic disorderness. Furthermore, pseudogenes are observed to harbor sequence variations, over their entirety, those become degenerative disease-causing mutations though the disease involvement of their progenitors is still unexplored. Here, we unveiled an immense association of disease genes in the genes casting pseudogenes in human. We interpreted the issue by disease associated miRNA targeting, genes containing polymorphisms in miRNA target sites, abundance of genes having disease causing non-synonymous mutations, disease gene specific network properties, presence of genes having repeat regions, affluence of dosage sensitive genes and the presence of intrinsically unstructured protein regions.     

Pandemic human viruses cause decline of endangered great apes

Commercial hunting and habitat loss are major drivers of the rapid decline of great apes [1]. Ecotourism and research have been widely promoted as a means of providing alternative value for apes and their habitats [2]. However, close contact between humans and habituated apes during ape tourism and research has raised concerns that disease transmission risks might outweigh benefits [3-7]. To date only bacterial and parasitic infections of typically low virulence have been shown to move from humans to wild apes [8, 9]. Here, we present the first direct evidence of virus transmission from humans to wild apes. Tissue samples from habituated chimpanzees that died during three respiratory-disease outbreaks at our research site, C?te d'Ivoire, contained two common human paramyxoviruses. Viral strains sampled from chimpanzees were closely related to strains circulating in contemporaneous, worldwide human epidemics. Twenty-four years of mortality data from observed chimpanzees reveal that such respiratory outbreaks could have a long history. In contrast, survey data show that research presence has had a strong positive effect in suppressing poaching around the research site. These observations illustrate the challenge of maximizing the benefit of research and tourism to great apes while minimizing the negative side effects.     

Survey of polymorphic sequence variation in the immediate 5' region of human DNA repair genes

Systematic screens have revealed extensive DNA sequence variation existing in the human population. Studies of the role of polymorphic genetic variants in explaining the association of family history with risk of common disease have generally focused on variants predicted to disrupt protein structure and activity. Recent studies have identified genetic variation in the level of expression of many genes, variation that is potentially biologically relevant in explaining individual variation in disease risk. In a survey of data available for 108 DNA repair genes that have been systematically screened for sequence variation, an average of 3.3 SNPs per gene were found to exist at a variant allele frequency of at least 0.02 in the region 2kb upstream from the 5'-untranslated region. One-third of the genes harbored a SNP with an allele frequency of at least 0.02 within a predicted promotor element. These variants are distributed among promoter elements that average 20 elements per gene. The frequency of polymorphic SNPs in CpG islands was 0.8 per gene, while the frequency of SNPs in the 5'-UTR was 0.7 per gene. The recognition of extensive genetic variation with potential to impact levels of gene expression, and thereby exacerbate the impact of amino acid substitution variants on the activity of proteins, increases the complexity of analyses required to explain the molecular genetic basis for the familial contribution to the sporadic incidence of common disease.     

Evolutionary conservation and network structure characterize genes of phenotypic relevance for mitosis in human

The impact of gene silencing on cellular phenotypes is difficult to establish due to the complexity of interactions in the associated biological processes and pathways. A recent genome-wide RNA knock-down study both identified and phenotypically characterized a set of important genes for the cell cycle in HeLa cells. Here, we combine a molecular interaction network analysis, based on physical and functional protein interactions, in conjunction with evolutionary information, to elucidate the common biological and topological properties of these key genes. Our results show that these genes tend to be conserved with their corresponding protein interactions across several species and are key constituents of the evolutionary conserved molecular interaction network. Moreover, a group of bistable network motifs is found to be conserved within this network, which are likely to influence the network stability and therefore the robustness of cellular functioning. They form a cluster, which displays functional homogeneity and is significantly enriched in genes phenotypically relevant for mitosis. Additional results reveal a relationship between specific cellular processes and the phenotypic outcomes induced by gene silencing. This study introduces new ideas regarding the relationship between genotype and phenotype in the context of the cell cycle. We show that the analysis of molecular interaction networks can result in the identification of genes relevant to cellular processes, which is a promising avenue for future research.     

The genomic sequence for Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes' loci of human is apparently conserved in the great apes

Chromosomal changes through pericentric inversions play an important role in the origin of species. Certain pericentric inversions are too minute to be detected cytogenetically, thus hindering the complete reconstruction of hominoid phylogeny. The advent of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique has facilitated the identification of many chromosomal segments, even at the single gene level. Therefore the cosmid probe for Prader-Willi (PWS)/Angelman syndrome to the loci on human chromosome 15 [ql 1-12] is being used as a marker to highlight the complementary sequence in higher primates. We hybridized metaphase chromosomes of chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), and orangutan (PPY) with this probe (Oncor) to characterize the chromosomal segments because the nature of these pericentric inversions remains relatively unknown. Our observations suggest that a pericentric inversion has occurred in chimpanzee chromosome (PTR 16) which corresponds to human chromosome 15 at PTR 16 band pl 112, while in gorilla (GGO 15) and orangutan (PPY 16) the bands q11-12 complemented to human chromosome 15 band q11-12. This approach has proven to be a better avenue to characterize the pericentric inversions which have apparently occurred during human evolution. Genetic divergence in the speciation process which occurs through chromosomal rearrangement needs to be reevaluated and further explored using newer techniques.Correspondence to: R.S. Verma     

Interactions between zoo‐housed great apes and local wildlife

Although there are published reports of wild chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans hunting and consuming vertebrate prey, data pertaining to captive apes remain sparse. In this survey‐based study, we evaluate the prevalence and nature of interactions between captive great apes and various indigenous wildlife species that range into their enclosures in North America. Our hypotheses were threefold: (a) facilities housing chimpanzees will report the most frequent and most aggressive interactions with local wildlife; (b) facilities housing orangutans and bonobos will report intermediate frequencies of these interactions with low levels of aggression and killing; and (c) facilities housing gorillas will report the lowest frequency of interactions and no reports of killing local wildlife. Chimpanzees and bonobos demonstrated the most aggressive behavior toward wildlife, which matched our predictions for chimpanzees, but not bonobos. This fits well with expectations for chimpanzees based on their natural history of hunting and consuming prey in wild settings, and also supports new field data on bonobos. Captive gorillas and orangutans were reported to be much less likely to chase, catch and kill wildlife than chimpanzees and bonobos. Gorillas were the least likely to engage in aggressive interactions with local wildlife, matching our predictions based on natural history. However unlike wild gorillas, captive gorillas were reported to kill (and in one case, eat) local wildlife. These results suggest that some behavioral patterns seen in captive groups of apes may be useful for modeling corresponding activities in the wild that may not be as easily observed and quantified. Furthermore, the data highlight the potential for disease transmission in some captive settings, and we outline the associated implications for ape health and safety. Am. J. Primatol. 71:458–465, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Identification and location of nine T5 bacteriophage tRNA genes by DNA sequence analysis.

Sequence analysis of two DNA fragments generated from bacteriophage T5 DNA by restriction with Hpa I and Hae III has resulted in the detection and localization of nine tRNA genes (His, two Ser genes, Leu, Val, Lys, fMet, Pro, and Ile). The genes which code for tRNAs His and Leu are partials, whereas the remaining genes are complete. A majority of the tRNA genes are located in close proximity to one another. A unique feature of the Pro and Ile genes is that their DNA sequence overlap.     

Ebola in great apes – current knowledge,possibilities for vaccination,and implications for conservation and human health

相似文献