Colourless sulfur bacteria and their role in the sulfur cycle

Summary The bacteria belonging to the families of the Thiobacteriaceae, Beggiatoaceae and Achromatiaceae are commonly called the colourless sulfur bacteria. While their ability to oxidize reduced inorganic sulfur compounds has clearly been established, it is still not known whether all these organisms can derive metabolically useful energy from these oxidations. During the last decades research has mainly focussed on the genus Thiobacillus. Bacteria belonging to this genus can oxidize a variety of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds and detailed information is available on the biochemistry and physiology of these energy-yielding reactions. The thiobacilli, most of which can synthesize all cell material from CO₂, possess a well-regulated metabolic machinery with high biosynthetic capacities, which is essentially similar to that of other procaryotic organisms. Although the qualitative role of colourless sulfur bacteria in the sulfur cycle is well documented, quantitative data are virtually absent. Activities of colourless sulfur bacteria in nature must be related to direct and indirect parameters, such as: the rate of oxidation of (S³⁵) sulfur compounds, the rate of C¹⁴O₂-fixation, the rate of acid production and numbers and growth rates of the bacteria. However, chemical reactions and similar activities of heterotrophic organisms mask the activities of the colourless sulfur bacteria to various extents, depending on the condition of the natural environment. This interference is minimal in regions where high temperature and/or low pH allow the development of a dominant population of colourless sulfur bacteria, such as hot acid sulfur springs, sulfide ores, sulfur deposits and some acid soils. The oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds is carried out by a spectrum of sulfur-oxidizing organisms which includes: 1) obligately chemolithotrophic organisms 2) mixotrophs 3) chemolithotrophic heterotrophs 4) heterotrophs which do not gain energy from the oxidation of sulfur compounds but benefit in other ways from this reaction, and 5) heterotrophs which do not benefit from the oxidation of sulfur compounds. The spectrum is completed by a hypothetical group of heterotrophic organisms, which may have a symbiotic relationship with thiobacilli and related bacteria. Such heterotrophs may stimulate the growth of colourless sulfur bacteria and thereby contribute to the oxidation of sulfur compounds. Future research should focus in the first place on obtaining and studying pure cultures of many of the colourless sulfur bacteria. In the second place, studies on the physiological and ecological aspects of mixed cultures of colourless sulfur bacteria and heterotrophs may add to a better understanding of the role of the colourless sulfur bacteria in the sulfur cycle. Paper read at the Symposium on the Sulphur Cycle, Wageningen, May 1974.     

Distribution,Diversity, and Activities of Sulfur Dioxygenases in Heterotrophic Bacteria

Sulfur oxidation by chemolithotrophic bacteria is well known; however, sulfur oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria is often ignored. Sulfur dioxygenases (SDOs) (EC 1.13.11.18) were originally found in the cell extracts of some chemolithotrophic bacteria as glutathione (GSH)-dependent sulfur dioxygenases. GSH spontaneously reacts with elemental sulfur to generate glutathione persulfide (GSSH), and SDOs oxidize GSSH to sulfite and GSH. However, SDOs have not been characterized for bacteria, including chemolithotrophs. The gene coding for human SDO (human ETHE1 [hETHE1]) in mitochondria was discovered because its mutations lead to a hereditary human disease, ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Using sequence analysis and activity assays, we discovered three subgroups of bacterial SDOs in the proteobacteria and cyanobacteria. Ten selected SDO genes were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli, and the recombinant proteins were purified. The SDOs used Fe²⁺ for catalysis and displayed considerable variations in specific activities. The wide distribution of SDO genes reveals the likely source of the hETHE1 gene and highlights the potential of sulfur oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria.     

Inorganic sulfur oxidizing system in green sulfur bacteria

Green sulfur bacteria use various reduced sulfur compounds such as sulfide, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate as electron donors for photoautotrophic growth. This article briefly summarizes what is known about the inorganic sulfur oxidizing systems of these bacteria with emphasis on the biochemical aspects. Enzymes that oxidize sulfide in green sulfur bacteria are membrane-bound sulfide-quinone oxidoreductase, periplasmic (sometimes membrane-bound) flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase, and monomeric flavocytochrome c (SoxF). Some green sulfur bacteria oxidize thiosulfate by the multienzyme system called either the TOMES (thiosulfate oxidizing multi-enzyme system) or Sox (sulfur oxidizing system) composed of the three periplasmic proteins: SoxB, SoxYZ, and SoxAXK with a soluble small molecule cytochrome c as the electron acceptor. The oxidation of sulfide and thiosulfate by these enzymes in vitro is assumed to yield two electrons and result in the transfer of a sulfur atom to persulfides, which are subsequently transformed to elemental sulfur. The elemental sulfur is temporarily stored in the form of globules attached to the extracellular surface of the outer membranes. The oxidation pathway of elemental sulfur to sulfate is currently unclear, although the participation of several proteins including those of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase system etc. is suggested from comparative genomic analyses.     

Oxidative metabolism of inorganic sulfur compounds by bacteria

The history of the elucidation of the microbiology and biochemistry of the oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds in chemolithotrophic bacteria is briefly reviewed, and the contribution of Martinus Beijerinck to the study of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria highlighted. Recent developments in the biochemistry, enzymology and molecular biology of sulfur oxidation in obligately and facultatively lithotrophic bacteria are summarized, and the existence of at least two major pathways of thiosulfate (sulfur and sulfide) oxidation confirmed. These are identified as the Paracoccus sulfur oxidation (or PSO) pathway and the S4intermediate (or S4I) pathway respectively. The former occurs in organisms such as Paracoccus (Thiobacillus) versutus and P. denitrificans, and possibly in Thiobacillus novellus and Xanthobacter spp. The latter pathway is characteristic of the obligate chemolithotrophs (e.g. Thiobacillus tepidarius, T. neapolitanus, T. ferrooxidans, T. thiooxidans) and facultative species such as T. acidophilus and T. aquaesulis, all of which can produce or oxidize tetrathionate when grown on thiosulfate. The central problem, as yet incompletely resolved in all cases, is the enzymology of the conversion of sulfane-sulfur (as in the outer [S-] atom of thiosulfate [-S-SO3-]), or sulfur itself, to sulfate, and whether sulfite is involved as a free intermediate in this process in all, or only some, cases. The study of inorganic sulfur compound oxidation for energetic purposes in bacteria (i.e. chemolithotrophy and sulfur photolithotrophy) poses challenges for comparative biochemistry. It also provides evidence of convergent evolution among diverse bacterial groups to achieve the end of energy-yielding sulfur compound oxidation (to drive autotrophic growth on carbon dioxide) but using a variety of enzymological systems, which share some common features. Some new data are presented on the oxidation of 35S-thiosulfate, and on the effect of other anions (selenate, molybdate, tu ngstate, chromate, vanadate) on sulfur compound oxidation, including observations which relate to the roles of polythionates and elemental sulfur as intermediates.     

Oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds by obligatory organotrophic bacteria

New data obtained by the author and other researchers on two different groups of obligately heterotrophic bacteria capable of inorganic sulfur oxidation are reviewed. Among culturable marine and (halo)alkaliphilic heterotrophs oxidizing sulfur compounds (thiosulfate and, much less actively, elemental sulfur and sulfide) incompletely to tetrathionate, representatives of the gammaproteobacteria, especially from the Halomonas group, dominate. Some of denitrifying species from this group are able to carry out anaerobic oxidation of thiosulfate and sulfide using nitrogen oxides as electron acceptors. Despite the low energy output of the reaction of thiosulfate oxidation to tetrathionate, it can be utilized for ATP synthesis by some tetrathionate-producing heterotrophs; however, this potential is not always realized during their growth. Another group of marine and (halo)alkaliphilic heterotrophic bacteria capable of complete oxidation of sulfur compounds to sulfate mostly includes representatives of the alphaproteobacteria most closely related to nonsulfur purple bacteria. They can oxidize sulfide (polysulfide), thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur via sulfite to sulfate but neither produce nor oxidize tetrathionate. All of the investigated sulfate-forming heterotrophic bacteria belong to lithoheterotrophs, being able to gain additional energy from the oxidation of sulfur compounds during heterotrophic growth on organic substrates. Some doubtful cases of heterotrophic sulfur oxidation described in the literature are also discussed.     

Mechanism of oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds by thiosulfate-grown Thiobacillus thiooxidans

Thiobacillus thiooxidans was grown at pH 5 on thiosulfate as an energy source, and the mechanism of oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds was studied by the effect of inhibitors, stoichiometries of oxygen consumption and sulfur, sulfite, or tetrathionate accumulation, and cytochrome reduction by substrates. Both intact cells and cell-free extracts were used in the study. The results are consistent with the pathway with sulfur and sulfite as the key intermediates. Thiosulfate was oxidized after cleavage to sulfur and sulfite as intermediates at pH 5, the optimal growth pH on thiosulfate, but after initial condensation to tetrathionate at pH 2.3 where the organism failed to grow. N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM) inhibited sulfur oxidation directly and the oxidation of thiosulfate or tetrathionate indirectly. It did not inhibit the sulfite oxidation by cells, but inhibited any reduction of cell cytochromes by sulfur, thiosulfate, tetrathionate, and sulfite. NEM probably binds sulfhydryl groups, which are possibly essential in supplying electrons to initiate sulfur oxidation. 2-Heptyl-4-hydroxy-quinoline N-oxide (HQNO) inhibited the oxidation of sulfite directly and that of sulfur, thiosulfate, and tetrathionate indirectly. Uncouplers, carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), inhibited sulfite oxidation by cells, but not the oxidation by extracts, while HQNO inhibited both. It is proposed that HQNO inhibits the oxidation of sulfite at the cytochrome b site both in cells and extracts, but uncouplers inhibit the oxidation in cells only by collapsing the energized state of cells, delta muH+, required either for electron transfer from cytochrome c to b or for sulfite binding.     

Autotrophic,sulfur-oxidizing actinobacteria in acidic environments

Some novel actinobacteria from geothermal environments were shown to grow autotrophically with sulfur as an energy source. These bacteria have not been formally named and are referred to here as “Acidithiomicrobium” species, as the first of the acidophilic actinobacteria observed to grow on sulfur. They are related to Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans with which they share a capacity for ferrous iron oxidation. Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is active in CO₂ fixation by Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans, which appears to have acquired its RuBisCO-encoding genes from the proteobacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans or its ancestor. This lateral transfer of RuBisCO genes between a proteobacterium and an actinobacterium would add to those noted previously among proteobacteria, between proteobacteria and cyanobacteria and between proteobacteria and plastids. “Acidithiomicrobium” has RuBisCO-encoding genes which are most closely related to those of Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, and has additional RuBisCO genes of a different lineage. 16S rRNA gene sequences from “Acidithiomicrobium” species dominated clone banks of the genes extracted from mixed cultures of moderate thermophiles growing on copper sulfide and polymetallic sulfide ores in ore leaching columns.     

Marine acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium requiring salts for the oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds

An acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium was isolated from seawater, and designated as strain SH. Strain SH was a Gram-negative, rod-shaped and motile bacterium, which had an optimum temperature and pH value for growth of 30 degrees C and 4.0, respectively. The mol% guanine plus cytosine of the DNA was 46.0. Chemolithotrophic growth was observed with elemental sulfur and tetrathionate at pH 4.0, and was not observed with ferrous ion. The isolate was able to utilize carbon dioxide as a carbon source, and was unable to grow heterotrophically with yeast extract or glucose. The growth of strain SH was activated in medium supplemented with NaCl. However, LiCl and KCl did not sustain the growth of strain SH. The results indicate that strain SH was an acidophilic, halophilic, and obligately chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA sequences indicated that strain SH had a close relationship to Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. The oxidizing activities of sulfur and sulfite with resting cells were stimulated not only by the addition of NaCl, but also by KCl and LiCl. The oxidation of sulfite was inhibited by ionophores, carbonyl cyanide- m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), and monensin, and respiratory inhibitors, KCN and 2-heptyl-4-hydroxy-quinoline-N-oxode (HQNO).     

A hydrocarbon-oxidizing acidophilic thermotolerant bacterial association from sulfur blocks

A stable bacterial association isolated from a sulfur block sample of the Astrakhan gas processing complex was able to utilize n-alkanes as the sole carbon and energy source at low pH. Hydrocarbon-dependent growth occurred at pH 1.6–5.5 (optimum at pH 2.5) and 20–50°C (optimum at 30–35°C). Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene fragments isolated from the total DNA of the enrichment by PCR-DGGE revealed the nucleotide sequences most closely related to extreme acidophilic chemolithotrophs Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Sulfobacillus sp. (98–99% similarity) and the sequences exhibiting high similarity to those of slowly growing actinobacteria Mycobacterium europaeum and M. parascrofulaceum (98%). Capacity of any of these organisms for hydrocarbon oxidation has not been reported previously. The taxonomic position of the 16S rRNA gene fragments from the enrichment culture suggests that this bacterial association is a unique microbial community, in which development of acidophilic hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria is mediated by a localized pH decrease in the sulfur blocks resulting from elemental sulfur oxidation due to massive development of chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.     

Biochemistry and molecular biology of lithotrophic sulfur oxidation by taxonomically and ecologically diverse bacteria and archaea

Lithotrophic sulfur oxidation is an ancient metabolic process. Ecologically and taxonomically diverged prokaryotes have differential abilities to utilize different reduced sulfur compounds as lithotrophic substrates. Different phototrophic or chemotrophic species use different enzymes, pathways and mechanisms of electron transport and energy conservation for the oxidation of any given substrate. While the mechanisms of sulfur oxidation in obligately chemolithotrophic bacteria, predominantly belonging to Beta - (e.g. Thiobacillus ) and Gammaproteobacteria (e.g. Thiomicrospira ), are not well established, the Sox system is the central pathway in the facultative bacteria from Alphaproteobacteria (e.g. Paracoccus ). Interestingly, photolithotrophs such as Rhodovulum belonging to Alphaproteobacteria also use the Sox system, whereas those from Chromatiaceae and Chlorobi use a truncated Sox complex alongside reverse-acting sulfate-reducing systems. Certain chemotrophic magnetotactic Alphaproteobacteria allegedly utilize such a combined mechanism. Sulfur-chemolithotrophic metabolism in Archaea, largely restricted to Sulfolobales , is distinct from those in Bacteria. Phylogenetic and biomolecular fossil data suggest that the ubiquity of sox genes could be due to horizontal transfer, and coupled sulfate reduction/sulfide oxidation pathways, originating in planktonic ancestors of Chromatiaceae or Chlorobi , could be ancestral to all sulfur-lithotrophic processes. However, the possibility that chemolithotrophy, originating in deep sea, is the actual ancestral form of sulfur oxidation cannot be ruled out.     

Chemolithotrophic perchlorate reduction linked to the oxidation of elemental sulfur

Perchlorate (ClO(4)(-)) contamination of ground and surface water has been recently recognized as a widespread environmental problem. Biological methods offer promising perspectives of perchlorate remediation. Facultative anaerobic bacteria couple the oxidation of organic and inorganic electron-donating substrates to the reduction of perchlorate as a terminal electron acceptor, converting it completely to the benign end-product, chloride. Insoluble inorganic substrates are of interest for low maintenance bioreactor or permeable reactive barrier systems because they can provide a long-term supply of electron donor without generating organic residuals. The main objective of this research was to investigate the feasibility of utilizing elemental sulfur (S(0)) as an insoluble electron donor for the biological reduction of perchlorate. A chemolithotrophic enrichment culture derived from aerobic activated sludge was obtained which effectively coupled the oxidation of elemental sulfur to sulfate with the reduction of perchlorate to chloride and gained energy from the process for cell growth. The enrichment culture grew at a rate of 0.41 or 0.81 1/d in the absence and presence of added organic carbon for cell growth, respectively. The enrichment culture was also shown to carry out sulfur disproportionation to a limited extent as evidenced by the formation of sulfide and sulfate in the absence of added electron acceptor. When nitrate and perchlorate were added together, the two electron acceptors were removed simultaneously after an initial partial decrease in the nitrate concentration.     

Homologs from sulfur oxidation (Sox) and methanol dehydrogenation (Xox) enzyme systems collaborate to give rise to a novel pathway of chemolithotrophic tetrathionate oxidation

The SoxXAYZB(CD)₂‐mediated pathway of bacterial sulfur‐chemolithotrophy explains the oxidation of thiosulfate, sulfide, sulfur and sulfite but not tetrathionate. Advenella kashmirensis, which oxidizes tetrathionate to sulfate, besides forming it as an intermediate during thiosulfate oxidation, possesses a soxCDYZAXOB operon. Knock‐out mutations proved that only SoxBCD is involved in A. kashmirensis tetrathionate oxidation, whereas thiosulfate‐to‐tetrathionate conversion is Sox independent. Expression of two glutathione metabolism‐related proteins increased under chemolithotrophic conditions, as compared to the chemoorganotrophic one. Substrate‐dependent oxygen consumption pattern of whole cells, and sulfur‐oxidizing enzyme activities of cell‐free extracts, measured in the presence/absence of thiol inhibitors/glutathione, corroborated glutathione involvement in tetrathionate oxidation. Furthermore, proteome analyses detected a sulfite:acceptor oxidoreductase (SorAB) exclusively under chemolithotrophic conditions, while expression of a methanol dehydrogenase (XoxF) homolog, subsequently named thiol dehydrotransferase (ThdT), was found to increase 3‐ and 10‐fold during thiosulfate‐to‐tetrathionate conversion and tetrathionate oxidation respectively. A thdT knock‐out mutant did not oxidize tetrathionate but converted half of the supplied 40 mM S‐thiosulfate to tetrathionate. Knock‐out of another thiosulfate dehydrogenase (tsdA) gene proved that both ThdT and TsdA individually converted ～ 20 mM S‐thiosulfate to tetrathionate. The overexpressed and isolated ThdT protein exhibited PQQ‐dependent thiosulfate dehydrogenation, whereas its PQQ‐independent thiol transfer activity involving tetrathionate and glutathione potentially produced a glutathione:sulfodisulfane adduct and sulfite. SoxBCD and SorAB were hypothesized to oxidize the aforesaid adduct and sulfite respectively.     

Kinetic studies on elemental sulfur oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: sulfur limitation and activity of free and adsorbed bacteria

The kinetics of sulfur oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in shaking flasks and a 10-L reactor was studied. The observed linearity of growth and sulfur oxidation was explained by sulfur limitation. Total cell yield was not significantly different for exponential growth as compared to growth during the sulfur-limiting phase. Kinetic studies of sulfur oxidation by growing and nongrowing bacteria indicated that both free and adsorbed bacteria oxidize sulfur. Changes in the number of free bacteria rather than cells adsorbed on sulfur were better predictors of the kinetics of sulfur oxidation, indicating that the free bacteria were performing sulfur oxidation. The active growth phase always followed adsorption of bacteria on sulfur; however, the special metabolic role of adsorbed bacteria was unclear. Their activity in sulfur solubilization was considered.     

Utilization of different sulfur sources by propionic acid bacteria

The object of this work was to study the ability of propionic bacteria to utilize sulfur compounds having various degrees of oxidation. Propionibacterium shermanii was found to utilize sulfite, thiosulfate, sulfide and elemental sulfur, apart from sulfate, as a sulfur source. When the culture grew in a medium with elemental sulfur, sulfide was produced. The utilization of sulfate by P. shermanii had a peculiar character. In the process of the culture growth, the utilization of sulfate alternated with its release into the medium.     

Quantitative proteomics of Chlorobaculum tepidum: insights into the sulfur metabolism of a phototrophic green sulfur bacterium

Chlorobaculum (Cba.) tepidum is a green sulfur bacterium that oxidizes sulfide, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate for photosynthetic growth. To gain insight into the sulfur metabolism, the proteome of Cba. tepidum cells sampled under different growth conditions has been quantified using a rapid gel-free, filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) protocol with an in-solution isotopic labeling strategy. Among the 2245 proteins predicted from the Cba. tepidum genome, approximately 970 proteins were detected in unlabeled samples, whereas approximately 630-640 proteins were detected in labeled samples comparing two different growth conditions. Wild-type cells growing on thiosulfate had an increased abundance of periplasmic cytochrome c-555 and proteins of the periplasmic thiosulfate-oxidizing SOX enzyme system when compared with cells growing on sulfide. A dsrM mutant of Cba. tepidum, which lacks the dissimilatory sulfite reductase DsrM protein and therefore is unable to oxidize sulfur globules to sulfite, was also investigated. When compared with wild type, the dsrM cells exhibited an increased abundance of DSR enzymes involved in the initial steps of sulfur globule oxidation (DsrABCL) and a decreased abundance of enzymes putatively involved in sulfite oxidation (Sat-AprAB-QmoABC). The results show that Cba. tepidum regulates the cellular levels of enzymes involved in sulfur metabolism and other electron-transferring processes in response to the availability of reduced sulfur compounds.     

Studies on the metabolism of a sulfur-oxidizing bacterium V. Comparative studies on sulfur and sulfite oxidizing systems of Thiobacillus thiooxidans

Properties of the oxidation systems of sulfur and sulfite ofa sulfur oxidizing bacterium, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, arecompared by using various inhibitors. Oxidation of sulfur isinhibited by a low concentration of monoiodoacetic acid, NEMand pCMB. Inhibition by pCMB is diminished by the addition ofan equivalent amount of cysteine to that of added pCMB. Althoughinhibition by pCMB is also observed in the oxidation of sulfite,it is not diminished by the addition of excess cysteine andthe extent of inhibition is lower than that in the oxidationof sulfur. Metal chelating agents, such as DDC, 8-hydroxyquinoline, salicylaldoximeand neocuproine have inhibitory effects on the oxidation ofsulfur but do not affect the oxidation of sulfite. Carbon monoxide inhibits the oxidation of sulfur photo-irreversiblyand the oxidation of sulfite photo-reversibly. Alcohols and organic acids, inhibit the oxidation of both sulfurand sulfite. The cell-free extract prepared by sonic disruptionof cells can oxidize sulfite, but not sulfur. The sulfur oxidizingextract can be, however, prepared by disruption under a nitrogenatmosphere. Both the soluble and participate fractions are requiredfor the oxidation of sulfur, while sulfite oxidation is catalyzedby the participate fraction alone. ¹Partly supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education.     

Reduced sulfur compound oxidation by Thiobacillus caldus.

The oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds was studied by using resting cells of the moderate thermophile Thiobacillus caldus strain KU. The oxygen consumption rate and total oxygen consumed were determined for the reduced sulfur compounds thiosulfate, tetrathionate, sulfur, sulfide, and sulfite in the absence and in the presence of inhibitors and uncouplers. The uncouplers 2,4-dinitrophenol and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl-hydrazone had no affect on the oxidation of thiosulfate, suggesting that thiosulfate is metabolized periplasmically. In contrast, the uncouplers completely inhibited the oxidation of tetrathionate, sulfide, sulfur, and sulfite, indicating that these compounds are metabolized in the cytoplasm of T. caldus KU. N-Ethylmaleimide inhibited the oxidation of tetrathionate and thiosulfate at the stage of elemental sulfur, while 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide stopped the oxidation of thiosulfate, tetrathionate, and elemental sulfur at the stage of sulfite. The following intermediates in the oxidation of the sulfur compounds were found by using uncouplers and inhibitors: thiosulfate was oxidized to tetrathionate, elemental sulfur was formed during the oxidation of tetrathionate and sulfide, and sulfite was found as an intermediate of tetrathionate and sulfur metabolism. On the basis of these data we propose a model for the metabolism of the reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by T. caldus KU.     

Specific detection of green sulfur bacteria by in situ hybridization with a fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probe

An oligodeoxynucleotide probe (GSB-532) specific for green sulfur bacteria was developed. Highly stringent hybridization conditions were established using whole cells of Chlorobium limicola DSM249 immobilized on glass slides. At a formamide concentration of 10%, the optimum specificity was reached at 47 °C. When a conventional fixation procedure was used, a conspicuous autofluorescence developed within the cells. This autofluorescence was due to the liberation of bacteriochlorophyll by the detergent Triton X-100 and a subsequent conversion to bacteriopheophytin and related compounds. The signal-to-noise ratio could be increased by a final dehydration of the samples with methanol. Finally, the method was adapted to the hybridization of natural samples collected on polycarbonate membrane filters. In situ hybridization of pure cultures, various enrichments, and natural samples from the chemocline of a freshwater lake confirmed that probe GSB-532 hybridized exclusively to cells of green sulfur bacteria. Our protocol allows the highly specific detection of green sulfur bacteria in water samples and a rapid screening of natural bacterial communities. Employing probe GSB-532, the phylogenetic affiliation of the epibionts in “Chlorochromatium aggregatum” and “Pelochromatium roseum” could be demonstrated for the first time. Received: 26 October 1998 / Accepted: 7 January 1999     

Production of methanethiol and volatile sulfur compounds by the archaeon “Ferroplasma acidarmanus”

Acidophiles are typically isolated from sulfate-rich ecological niches yet the role of sulfur metabolism in their growth and survival is poorly defined. Studies of heterotrophically grown “Ferroplasma acidarmanus” showed that its growth requires a minimum of 100 mM of a sulfate-containing salt. Headspace gas analyses by GC/MS determined that the volatile sulfur compound emitted by active “F. acidarmanus” cultures is methanethiol. In “F. acidarmanus” cultures grown either heterotrophically or chemolithotrophically, methanethiol was produced constitutively. Radiotracer studies with ³⁵S-labeled methionine, cysteine, and sulfate showed that all three were used in methanethiol production. Additionally, ³H-labeled methionine was incorporated into methanethiol and was probably used as a methyl-group donor. Methanethiol production in whole cell lysates supplied with SO₃²⁻ indicated that NADPH-dependant sulfite reductase and methyltransferase activities were present. Cell lysates also contained enzymatic activity for methionine-γ-lyase that cleaved the side chain of either methionine to form methanethiol or cysteine to produce H₂S. Since methanethiol was detected from the degradation of cysteine, it is likely that sulfide was methylated by a thiol methyltransferase. Collectively, these data demonstrate that “F. acidarmanus” produces methanethiol through the metabolism of methionine, cysteine, or sulfate. This is the first report of a methanethiol-producing acidophile, thus identifying a new contributor to the global sulfur cycle.     

Carbon and sulfur metabolism in representatives of two clusters of bacteria of the genus Leucothrix: a comparative study

Major pathways of carbon and sulfur metabolisms were studied in representatives of two clusters of bacteria: Leucothrix thiophila (cluster I, strains 2WS, 4WS, and 6WS) and Leucothrix sp. (cluster II, strains 1WS, 3WS, and 5WS). All strains were capable of chemoorganoheterotrophic growth, as well as of chemolithoheterotrophic growth in the presence of reduced sulfur compounds. The bacteria were found to possess a complete set of the enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and glyoxylate cycle. The hydrogenase activity in cells of cluster I strains was an order of magnitude lower than in cluster II strains and in other known heterotrophic bacteria. Cells of bacteria of both clusters exhibited high activity levels of enzymes involved in the energy metabolism of sulfur. The oxidation of sulfur compounds and the operation of the electron-transport chain were shown to be related. Cluster II bacteria more efficiently use organic compounds in their energy metabolism, whereas cluster I bacteria are characterized by more efficient utilization of reduced sulfur compounds. During sulfite oxidation, cluster I bacteria can synthesize ATP both via substrate-level phosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation, whereas cluster II bacteria synthesize ATP only via the latter process.