Structural and functional analysis of denitrification genes in Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501

Denitrification is the process by which nitrates are converted to nitrogen gas under the action of microor-ganism, and in a bioenergetics viewpoint, a kind of respiration of bacteria in anoxia condition. In such a process, nitrogen in oxidation state replaces oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor in cell membrane, gen-erates potential gradient with the action of a series of oxidoreductase, and finally converts nitrate into nitro-gen[1]. Denitrification is widely present in nature, and resea…     

Marker exchange of the structural genes for nitric oxide reductase blocks the denitrification pathway of Pseudomonas stutzeri at nitric oxide.

Bacterial denitrification reverses nitrogen fixation in the global N-cycle by transforming nitrate or nitrite to dinitrogen. Both nitrite and nitric oxide (NO) are considered as the chemical species within the denitrification pathway, that precede nitrous oxide (N2O), the first recognized intermediate with N,N-bonds antecedent to N2. Molecular cloning of the structural genes for NO reductase from Pseudomonas stutzeri has allowed us to generate the first mutants defective in NO utilization (Nor- phenotype) by marker exchange of the norCB genes with a gene cassette for gentamicin resistance. Nitric oxide reductase was found to be an indispensable component for denitrification; its loss constituted a conditionally lethal mutation. NO as the sole product accumulated from nitrite by mutant cells induced for nitrite respiration (denitrification). The Nor- mutant lost the capability to reduce NO and did not grow anymore anaerobically on nitrate. A Nir-Nor- double mutation, that inactivated also the respiratory nitrite reductase cytochrome cd1 rendered the bacterium again viable under anaerobiosis. Our observations provide evidence for a denitrification pathway in vivo of NO2(-)----NO----N2O, and N,N-bond formation catalyzed by NO reductase and not by cytochrome cd1.     

Inability of Pseudomonas stutzeri denitrification mutants with the phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to grow in nitrous oxide

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 reduced nitrous oxide to dinitrogen but did not grow anaerobically in nitrous oxide. Two transposon insertion Nos- mutants of Pseudomonas stutzeri exhibited the P. aeruginosa phenotype. Growth yield studies demonstrated that nitrous oxide produced in vivo was productively respired, but nitrous oxide supplied exogenously was not. The defect may be in electron transport or in nitrous oxide uptake.     

Inability of Pseudomonas stutzeri denitrification mutants with the phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to grow in nitrous oxide.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 reduced nitrous oxide to dinitrogen but did not grow anaerobically in nitrous oxide. Two transposon insertion Nos- mutants of Pseudomonas stutzeri exhibited the P. aeruginosa phenotype. Growth yield studies demonstrated that nitrous oxide produced in vivo was productively respired, but nitrous oxide supplied exogenously was not. The defect may be in electron transport or in nitrous oxide uptake.     

Comparison of denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Paracoccus denitrificans

A comparison was made of denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Paracoccus denitrificans. Although all three organisms reduced nitrate to dinitrogen gas, they did so at different rates and accumulated different kinds and amounts of intermediates. Their rates of anaerobic growth on nitrate varied about 1.5-fold; concomitant gas production varied more than 8-fold. Cell yields from nitrate varied threefold. Rates of gas production by resting cells incubated with nitrate, nitrite, or nitrous oxide varied 2-, 6-, and 15-fold, respectively, among the three species. The composition of the gas produced also varied markedly: Pseudomonas stutzeri produced only dinitrogen; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Paracoccus denitrificans produced nitrous oxide as well; and under certain conditions Pseudomonas aeruginosa produced even more nitrous oxide than dinitrogen. Pseudomonas stutzeri and Paracoccus denitrificans rapidly reduced nitrate, nitrite, and nitrous oxide and were able to grow anaerobically when any of these nitrogen oxides were present in the medium. Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduced these oxides slowly and was unable to grow anaerobically at the expense of nitrous oxide. Furthermore, nitric and nitrous oxide reduction by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were exceptionally sensitive to inhibition by nitrite. Thus, although it has been well studied physiologically and genetically, Pseudomonas aeruginosa may not be the best species for studying the later steps of the denitrification pathway.     

Comparison of denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Paracoccus denitrificans.

A comparison was made of denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Paracoccus denitrificans. Although all three organisms reduced nitrate to dinitrogen gas, they did so at different rates and accumulated different kinds and amounts of intermediates. Their rates of anaerobic growth on nitrate varied about 1.5-fold; concomitant gas production varied more than 8-fold. Cell yields from nitrate varied threefold. Rates of gas production by resting cells incubated with nitrate, nitrite, or nitrous oxide varied 2-, 6-, and 15-fold, respectively, among the three species. The composition of the gas produced also varied markedly: Pseudomonas stutzeri produced only dinitrogen; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Paracoccus denitrificans produced nitrous oxide as well; and under certain conditions Pseudomonas aeruginosa produced even more nitrous oxide than dinitrogen. Pseudomonas stutzeri and Paracoccus denitrificans rapidly reduced nitrate, nitrite, and nitrous oxide and were able to grow anaerobically when any of these nitrogen oxides were present in the medium. Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduced these oxides slowly and was unable to grow anaerobically at the expense of nitrous oxide. Furthermore, nitric and nitrous oxide reduction by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were exceptionally sensitive to inhibition by nitrite. Thus, although it has been well studied physiologically and genetically, Pseudomonas aeruginosa may not be the best species for studying the later steps of the denitrification pathway.     

Continuous measurement of NOaq during denitrification by immobilized Pseudomonas stutzeri

Summary An ISO-NO sensor was used for continuous measurement of nitric oxide release and consumption during denitrification. The sensor was selectively responsive to NO in the presence of other denitrification-associated nitrogen oxides. Evolution of NO signal was coupled with the metabolism of NO₂ ^–. The immobilized Pseudomonas stutzeri seems able to to restrict its physiological NO pool to less than 100 nM (about 2 × 10^–5 mole/mole of the NO₃ ^– or NO₂ ^– reduced), a level being one hundredth of the concentration required to inactivate a population in 45 min.     

The structural genes of the nitric oxide reductase complex from Pseudomonas stutzeri are part of a 30-kilobase gene cluster for denitrification.

A gene cluster of 30 kilobases required for denitrification in Pseudomonas stutzeri ZoBell was identified and mapped. It harbors genes necessary for the respiratory reduction of nitrite (nir genes), nitric oxide (nor genes), and nitrous oxide (nos genes). Fifteen genes, 13 of which are transcribed in the same direction, have been located on a 56-kb BamHI fragment. They are arranged in three subclusters in the order nos-nir-nor.     

Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification by the bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri YZN-001

A strain YZN-001 was isolated from swine manure effluent and was identified as Pseudomonas stutzeri. It can utilise not only nitrate and nitrite, but also ammonium. The strain had the capability to fully remove as much as 275.08 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻–N and 171.40 mg L⁻¹ NO₂⁻–N under aerobic conditions. Furthermore, At 30 °C, the utilization of ammonium is approximately 95% by 18 h with a similar level removed by 72 h and 2 weeks at 10 and 4 °C, respectively. Triplicate sets of tightly sealed serum bottles were used to test the heterotrophic nitrifying ability of P. stutzeri YZN-001. The results showing that 39% of removed NH₄⁺–N was completely oxidised to nitrogen gas by 18 h. Indicating that the strain has heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification abilities, with the notable ability to remove ammonium at low temperatures, demonstrating a potential using the strain for future application in waste water treatment.     

Nitric oxide signaling in invertebrates

Nitric oxide (NO) is an unconventional neurotransmitter and neuromodulator molecule that is increasingly found to have important signaling functions in animals from nematodes to mammals. NO signaling mechanisms in the past were identified largely through experiments on mammals, after the discovery of NO's vasodilatory functions. The use of gene knock out mice has been particularly important in revealing the functions of the several isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme that produces NO. Recent studies have revealed rich diversity in NO signaling. In addition to the well-established pathway in which NO activates guanylyl cyclase and cGMP production, redox mechanisms involving protein nitrosylation are important contributors to modulation of neurotransmitter release and reception. NO signaling studies in invertebrates are now generating a wealth of comparative information. Invertebrate NOS isoforms have been identified in insects and molluscs, and the conserved and variable amino acid sequences evaluated. Calcium-calmodulin dependence and cofactor requirements are conserved. NADPH diaphorase studies show that NOS is found in echinoderms, coelenterates, nematodes, annelids, insects, crustaceans and molluscs. Accumulating evidence reveals that NO is used as an orthograde transmitter and cotransmitter, and as a modulator of conventional transmitter release. NO appears to be used in diverse animals for certain neuronal functions, such as chemosensory signalin, learning, and development, suggesting that these NO functions have been conserved during evolution. The discovery of NO's diverse and unconventional signaling functions has stimulated a plethora of enthusiastic investigations into its uses. We can anticipate the discovery of many more interesting and some surprising NO signaling functions.     

Nitric oxide signaling in yeast

As a cellular signaling molecule, nitric oxide (NO) is widely conserved from microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, to higher eukaryotes including plants and mammals. NO is mainly produced by NO synthase (NOS) or nitrite reductase (NIR) activity. There are several NO detoxification systems, including NO dioxygenase (NOD) and S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR). NO homeostasis based on the balance between NO synthesis and degradation is important for the regulation of its physiological functions because an excess level of NO causes nitrosative stress due to the high reactivity of NO and NO-derived compounds. In yeast, NO may be involved in stress responses, but NO and its signaling have been poorly understood due to the lack of mammalian NOS orthologs in the genome. Even though the activities of NOS and NIR have been observed in yeast cells, the gene encoding NOS and the NO production mechanism catalyzed by NIR remain unclear. On the other hand, yeast cells employ NOD and GSNOR to maintain an intracellular redox balance following endogenous NO production, exogenous NO treatment, or environmental stresses. This article reviews NO metabolism (synthesis, degradation) and its regulation in yeast. The physiological roles of NO in yeast, including the oxidative stress response, are also discussed here. Such investigations into NO signaling are essential for understanding the NO-dependent genetic and physiological modulations. In addition to being responsible for the pathology and pharmacology of various degenerative diseases, NO signaling may be a potential target for the construction and engineering of industrial yeast strains.     

Fe3O4对施氏假单胞菌反硝化过程的影响

生物反硝化是目前废水深度处理中应用最为广泛的硝酸盐氮处理技术,但该方法一般停留时间较长,在冬季因低温处理效果欠佳,因此有必要开发反硝化强化技术。以施氏假单胞菌Pseudomonas stutzeri为研究对象,考察了不同投加量下Fe3O4对P. stutzeri反硝化过程的影响。结果显示当Fe3O4投加量由0 mg/L增至4 000 mg/L时,硝酸盐氮最大比降解速率由18.0 h–1增加至23.7 h–1,体系中的总蛋白含量以及细菌体内的铁含量显著增加。RT-qPCR和非标记 (Label-free) 定量蛋白组学分析表明,投加4 000 mg/L Fe3O4体系中的P. stutzeri,其反硝化功能基因napA、narJ、nirB、norR、nosZ表达量分别提高了55.7%、24.9%、24.5%、36.5%、120%,对应反硝化还原酶Nap、Nar、Nir、Nor、Nos表达量提高了85.0%、147%、16.5%、47.1%、95.9%。对比体系中“游离细菌”和“Fe3O4粘附细菌”,发现二者的反硝化功能基因以及反硝化相关酶没有显著差别;而Fe3O4粘附细菌电子传递相关蛋白表达量有所提高,说明了Fe3O4通过与细菌直接接触促进其生长代谢,导致体系中细菌总量的增加,从而提高反硝化速率。该结果可为反硝化强化技术的开发提供理论支撑。     

Molecular cloning of aromatic degradative genes from Pseudomonas stutzeri

Abstract Using dialysed cell-free extracts of the purple non-sulphur bacterium Rhodomicrobium vannielii protein kinase activities capable of transferring the gamma phosphate group from gamma [³²P]ATP to a variety of polypeptides were detected. The optimum concentration of Mg²⁺ for protein kinase activity was about 20 mM and the phosphorylation of one polypeptide ( M _r 47 kDa) was inhibited by chlorpromazine, a calmodulin antagonist, and also by Ca²⁺. The activity of at least one of the protein kinases (or a phosphatase) was regulated by ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate.     

Effects of heavy metals on aerobic denitrification by strain Pseudomonas stutzeri PCN-1

Effects of heavy metals on aerobic denitrification have been poorly understood compared with their impacts on anaerobic denitrification. This paper presented effects of four heavy metals (Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II)) on aerobic denitrification by a novel aerobic denitrifying strain Pseudomonas stutzeri PCN-1. Results indicated that aerobic denitrifying activity decreased with increasing heavy metal concentrations due to their corresponding inhibition on the denitrifying gene expression characterized by a time lapse between the expression of the nosZ gene and that of the cnorB gene by PCN-1, which led to lower nitrate removal rate (1.67∼6.67 mg L⁻¹ h⁻¹), higher nitrite accumulation (47.3∼99.8 mg L⁻¹), and higher N₂O emission ratios (5∼283 mg L⁻¹/mg L⁻¹). Specially, promotion of the nosZ gene expression by increasing Cu(II) concentrations (0∼0.05 mg L⁻¹) was found, and the absence of Cu resulted in massive N₂O emission due to poor synthesis of N₂O reductase. The inhibition effect for both aerobic denitrifying activity and denitrifying gene expression was as follows from strongest to least: Cd(II) (0.5∼2.5 mg L⁻¹) > Cu(II) (0.5∼5 mg L⁻¹) > Ni(II) (2∼10 mg L⁻¹) > Zn(II) (25∼50 mg L⁻¹). Furthermore, sensitivity of denitrifying gene to heavy metals was similar in order of nosZ > nirS ≈ cnorB > napA. This study is of significance in understanding the potential application of aerobic denitrifying bacteria in practical wastewater treatment.