Regulation of DNA replication during the cell cycle: roles of Cdc7 kinase and coupling of replication, recombination, and repair in response to replication fork arrest

DNA replication is central to cell growth, development, and generation of tissues and organs. Recent advances in understanding replication machinery have revealed striking conservation of components involved in the processes of DNA replication, from yeasts to human. The conservation extends even to bacteria for some basic components of replication apparatus. Eukaryotic DNA replication is regulated at various stages to ensure strict regulation during cell cycle. We have identified a novel mammalian kinase, Cdc7-ASK (Activator of S phase Kinase), that plays a key role at the entry into S phase as a molecular switch for DNA replication. This kinase is specifically activated during S phase and triggers the firing of DNA replication by phosphorylating an essential DNA helicase component of the replication complex. Environmental stresses such as DNA damages or depletion of essential nutrients for DNA synthesis lead to unscheduled arrest of DNA replication forks. In bacteria, this leads to induction of altered modes of DNA replication, which may repair DNA damages, facilitate reassembly of replication machinery at the stalled replication fork, or do both. In eukaryotes, blocking replication forks usually induces both checkpoint responses, which prevent premature progression of cell cycle events before precise completion of the preceding cell cycle stage, and the recombinational repair system for the lesions. Possible common bases in recognition of stalled replication forks in bacteria and eukaryotes will be discussed. Furthermore, we will discuss the potential of replication and checkpoint proteins as targets of anticancer agents as well as possible novel technology for stem cell amplification through manipulation of DNA replication.     

Regulation of DNA replication during development

As development unfolds, DNA replication is not only coordinated with cell proliferation, but is regulated uniquely in specific cell types and organs. This differential regulation of DNA synthesis requires crosstalk between DNA replication and differentiation. This dynamic aspect of DNA replication is highlighted by the finding that the distribution of replication origins varies between differentiated cell types and changes with differentiation. Moreover, differential DNA replication in some cell types can lead to increases or decreases in gene copy number along chromosomes. This review highlights the recent advances and technologies that have provided us with new insights into the developmental regulation of DNA replication.     

RPA is an initiation factor for human chromosomal DNA replication

The initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in human cell nuclei is not well understood because of its complexity. To allow investigation of this process on a molecular level, we have recently established a cell-free system that initiates chromosomal DNA replication in an origin-specific manner under cell cycle control in isolated human cell nuclei. We have now used fractionation and reconstitution experiments to functionally identify cellular factors present in a human cell extract that trigger initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in this system. Initial fractionation of a cytosolic extract indicates the presence of at least two independent and non-redundant initiation factors. We have purified one of these factors to homogeneity and identified it as the single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA. The prokaryotic single-stranded DNA binding protein SSB cannot substitute for RPA in the initiation of human chromosomal DNA replication. Antibodies specific for human RPA inhibit the initiation step of human chromosomal DNA replication in vitro. RPA is recruited to DNA replication foci and becomes phosphorylated concomitant with the initiation step in vitro. These data establish a direct functional role for RPA as an essential factor for the initiation of human chromosomal DNA replication.     

Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells

The DNA damage and replication checkpoints are signaling mechanisms that regulate and coordinate cellular responses to genotoxic conditions. Unlike typical signal transduction mechanisms that respond to one or a few stimuli, checkpoints can be activated by a broad spectrum of extrinsically or intrinsically derived DNA damage or replication interference. Recent investigations have shed light on how the damage and replication checkpoints are able to respond to such diverse stimuli. The activation of checkpoints not only attenuates cell cycle progression but also facilitates DNA repair and recovery of faltered replication forks, thereby preventing DNA lesions from being converted to inheritable mutations. Recently, more checkpoint targets from the cell cycle and DNA replication apparatus have been identified, revealing the increasing complexity of the checkpoint control of the cell cycle. In this article, we discuss current models of the DNA damage and replication checkpoints and highlight recent advances in the field.     

Preexisting nuclear architecture defines the intranuclear location of herpesvirus DNA replication structures.

Herpes simplex virus DNA replication proteins localize in characteristic patterns corresponding to viral DNA replication structures in the infected cell nucleus. The intranuclear spatial organization of the HSV DNA replication structures and the factors regulating their nuclear location remain to be defined. We have used the HSV ICP8 DNA-binding protein and bromodeoxyuridine labeling as markers for sites of herpesviral DNA synthesis to examine the spatial organization of these structures within the cell nucleus. Confocal microscopy and three-dimensional computer graphics reconstruction of optical series through infected cells indicated that viral DNA replication structures extend through the interior of the cell nucleus and appear to be spatially separate from the nuclear lamina. Examination of viral DNA replication structures in infected, binucleate cells showed similar or virtually identical patterns of DNA replication structures oriented along a twofold axis of symmetry between many of the sister nuclei. These results demonstrate that HSV DNA replication structures are organized in the interior of the nucleus and that their location is defined by preexisting host cell nuclear architecture, probably the internal nuclear matrix.     

Mouse L cell mitochondrial DNA molecules are selected randomly for replication throughout the cell cycle

The number of mitochondrial DNA molecules in a cell population doubles at the same rate as the cell generation time. This could occur by a random selection of molecules for replication or by a process that ensures the replication of each individual molecule in the cell. We have investigated the rate at which mouse L cell mitochondrial DNA molecules labeled with 3H-thymidine during one round of replication are reselected for a second round of replication. Mouse L cells were labeled with 3H-thymidine for 2 hr, chased for various periods of time and then labeled with 5-bromodeoxyuridine for 4 hr immediately before mitochondrial DNA isolation. A constant fraction of 3H-thymidine-labeled mitochondrial DNA incorporated 5-bromodeoxyuridine after chase intervals ranging from 1.5-22 hr. This result demonstrates that mitochondrial DNA molecules replicated in a short time interval are randomly selected for later rounds of replication, and that replication of mitochondrial DNA continues throughout the cell cycle in mouse L cells.     

Escherichia coli contains a DNA replication compartment in the cell center

The active replication forks of E. coli B/r K cells growing with a doubling time of 210 min have been pulse-labeled with [(3)H] thymidine for 10 min. By electron-microscopic autoradiography the silver grains have been localized in the various length classes. From the known pattern of the DNA replication period in the cell cycle at slow growth and from the average position of grains per length class it was deduced that DNA replication starts in the cell center and that it remains there for a substantial part of the DNA replication period. This suggests the occurrence of a centrally located DNA replication compartment.     

Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories

Faithful DNA replication ensures genetic integrity in eukaryotic cells, but it is still obscure how replication is organized in space and time within the nucleus. Using timelapse microscopy, we have developed a new assay to analyze the dynamics of DNA replication both spatially and temporally in individual Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. This allowed us to visualize replication factories, nuclear foci consisting of replication proteins where the bulk of DNA synthesis occurs. We show that the formation of replication factories is a consequence of DNA replication itself. Our analyses of replication at specific DNA sequences support a long-standing hypothesis that sister replication forks generated from the same origin stay associated with each other within a replication factory while the entire replicon is replicated. This assay system allows replication to be studied at extremely high temporal resolution in individual cells, thereby opening a window into how replication dynamics vary from cell to cell.     

Regulatory interactions between phospholipid synthesis and DNA replication in Caulobacter crescentus.

Several Caulobacter crescentus mutants with lesions in phospholipid biosynthesis have DNA replication phenotypes. A C. crescentus mutant deficient in glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity (gpsA) blocks phospholipid synthesis, ceases DNA replication, and loses viability in the absence of a glycerol phosphate supplement. To investigate the interaction between membrane synthesis and DNA replication during a single cell cycle, we moved the gpsA mutation into a synchronizable, but otherwise wild-type, strain. The first effect of withholding supplement was the cessation of synthesis of phosphatidylglycerol, a major component of the C. crescentus membrane. In the absence of glycerol 3-phosphate, DNA replication was initiated in the stalked cell at the correct time in the cell cycle and at the correct site on the chromosome. However, after replication proceeded bidirectionally for a short time, DNA synthesis dropped to a low level. The cell cycle blocked at a distinct middivision stalked cell, and this was followed by cell death. The "glycerol-less" death of the gpsA mutant could be prevented if the cells were treated with novobiocin to prevent the initiation of DNA replication. Our observations suggest that the processivity of C. crescentus replication requires concomitant phospholipid synthesis and that cell death results from incomplete replication of the chromosome.     

Initiation of Chromosomal DNA Replication in Mammalian Cell-Free Systems

Chromosomal DNA replication is a fundamental part of the cell division cycle of eukaryotes, and its disruption often leads to genome instability and cancer. A focus for regulation is the initiation of the first replication forks, marking the transition from G1 to S phase. Direct biochemical investigation of the establishment and further progression of chromosomal DNA replication in human somatic cell nuclei has become possible through a cell-free system that obeys cell cycle control. Since its development less than a decade ago, several modifications and adaptations of the original system have been reported, which have led to temporal resolution of replication complex assembly and to the identification of novel DNA replication factors. Here, I will review the different systems, highlight fundamental differences and unifying concepts, and discuss their potential for understanding chromosomal DNA replication in somatic mammalian cells.     

The checkpoint response to replication stress

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells, and defective DNA replication, repair and recombination have been linked to its etiology. Increasing evidence suggests that proteins influencing S-phase processes such as replication fork movement and stability, repair events and replication completion, have significant roles in maintaining genome stability. DNA damage and replication stress activate a signal transduction cascade, often referred to as the checkpoint response. A central goal of the replication checkpoint is to maintain the integrity of the replication forks while facilitating replication completion and DNA repair and coordinating these events with cell cycle transitions. Progression through the cell cycle in spite of defective or incomplete DNA synthesis or unrepaired DNA lesions may result in broken chromosomes, genome aberrations, and an accumulation of mutations. In this review we discuss the multiple roles of the replication checkpoint during replication and in response to replication stress, as well as the enzymatic activities that cooperate with the checkpoint pathway to promote fork resumption and repair of DNA lesions thereby contributing to genome integrity.     

Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection

The eukaryotic cell replicates its chromosomal DNA with almost absolute fidelity in the course of every cell cycle. This accomplishment is remarkable considering that the conditions for DNA replication are rarely ideal. The replication machinery encounters a variety of obstacles on the chromosome, including damaged template DNA. In addition, a number of chromosome regions are considered to be difficult to replicate owing to DNA secondary structures and DNA binding proteins required for various transactions on the chromosome. Under these conditions, replication forks stall or break, posing grave threats to genomic integrity. How does the cell combat such stressful conditions during DNA replication? The replication fork protection complex (FPC) may help answer this question. Recent studies have demonstrated that the FPC is required for the smooth passage of replication forks at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions and plays a critical role in coordinating multiple genome maintenance processes at the replication fork.     

Application of an in vitro system in the study of chemotherapeutic drug effects on DNA replication

DNA replication machinery is an important target for chemotherapeutic drugs. We have used an in vitro system to study the effect of drugs on mammalian DNA replication, either by direct interaction with the DNA structure or with replication proteins and machinery. The anthracycline doxorubicin (Dox) showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on DNA replication, whether incubated with HeLa cell extracts or with DNA and nucleotides. Earliest-labeled fragment analysis revealed that inhibition of replication began within the origin-containing fragment in both control and Dox-containing reactions in vitro. AraC, a nucleoside analog, had no significant effect on DNA synthesis. In contrast, araCTP was able to inhibit DNA replication in vitro. Since metabolism is diminished in this in vitro system, the degree of phosphorylation of araC was apparently low. Progesterone showed an increase in nucleotide incorporation (sensitive to BuPdGTP inhibition of replication-specific polymerases α and δ) after preincubation with HeLa cell extracts, although progesterone receptors were not detectable in the HeLa cell extracts. In addition, we observed an inhibition in DNA replication when progesterone was preincubated with DNA and nucleotides. These results suggest that progesterone may have a mechanism of action that is different from any known to be mediated through progesterone receptors. In conclusion, these results indicate that this mammalian in vitro replication system will be useful for the study of mechanisms and design of therapeutic drugs that inhibit mammalian DNA replication. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection

The eukaryotic cell replicates its chromosomal DNA with almost absolute fidelity in the course of every cell cycle. This accomplishment is remarkable considering that the conditions for DNA replication are rarely ideal. The replication machinery encounters a variety of obstacles on the chromosome, including damaged template DNA. In addition, a number of chromosome regions are considered to be difficult to replicate owing to DNA secondary structures and DNA binding proteins required for various transactions on the chromosome. Under these conditions, replication forks stall or break, posing grave threats to genomic integrity. How does the cell combat such stressful conditions during DNA replication? The replication fork protection complex (FPC) may help answer this question. Recent studies have demonstrated that the FPC is required for the smooth passage of replication forks at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions and plays a critical role in coordinating multiple genome maintenance processes at the replication fork.     

Regulation of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication and Cell Division in Escherichia coli B/r

Synchronous cultures of Escherichia coli strain B/r were used to investigate the relationship between deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and cell division. We have determined that terminal steps in division can proceed in the absence of DNA synthesis. Inhibition of DNA replication with nalidixic acid prior to the start of a new round of replication does not stop cell division, which indicates that the start of the round is not essential in triggering cell division. Inhibition of DNA replication at any time prior to the termination of a round of replication completely blocks cell division, which suggests that there may be a link between the end of the replication cycle and the commitment of the cell to divide. Studies that use a temperature-sensitive mutant which is unable to synthesize DNA at the nonpermissive temperature are in complete agreement with those that use nalidixic acid to inhibit DNA synthesis. This adds support to the idea that the treatments employed limit their action to DNA synthesis. Investigation of minicell production indicates that the production of minicells is blocked when DNA synthesis is inhibited with nalidixic acid. Although nuclear segregation is not required for cell division, DNA synthesis is still required to trigger division. The evidence presented suggests strongly that (i) DNA synthesis is essential for cell division, (ii) the end of a round of replication triggers cell division, and (iii) there is considerable time lapse (one-half generation) between the completion of a round of DNA replication and physical separation of the cells.     

Dynamic relocalization of phage phi 29 DNA during replication and the role of the viral protein p16.7

We have examined the localization of DNA replication of the Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 by immunofluorescence. To determine where phage replication was localized within infected cells, we examined the distribution of phage replication proteins and the sites of incorporation of nucleotide analogues into phage DNA. On initiation of replication, the phage DNA localized to a single focus within the cell, nearly always towards one end of the host cell nucleoid. At later stages of the infection cycle, phage replication was found to have redistributed to multiple sites around the periphery of the nucleoid, just under the cell membrane. Towards the end of the cycle, phage DNA was once again redistributed to become located within the bulk of the nucleoid. Efficient redistribution of replicating phage DNA from the initial replication site to various sites surrounding the nucleoid was found to be dependent on the phage protein p16.7.     

Molecular anatomy of the DNA damage and replication checkpoints

Cell cycle checkpoints are signal transduction pathways that enforce the orderly execution of the cell division cycle and arrest the cell cycle upon the occurrence of undesirable events, such as DNA damage, replication stress, and spindle disruption. The primary function of the cell cycle checkpoint is to ensure that the integrity of chromosomal DNA is maintained. DNA lesions and disrupted replication forks are thought to be recognized by the DNA damage checkpoint and replication checkpoint, respectively. Both checkpoints initiate protein kinase-based signal transduction cascade to activate downstream effectors that elicit cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis that is often dependent on dose and cell type. These actions prevent the conversion of aberrant DNA structures into inheritable mutations and minimize the survival of cells with unrepairable damage. Genetic components of the damage and replication checkpoints have been identified in yeast and humans, and a working model is beginning to emerge. We summarize recent advances in the DNA damage and replication checkpoints and discuss the essential functions of the proteins involved in the checkpoint responses.     

In vitro replication of adeno-associated virus DNA: enhancement by extracts from adenovirus-infected HeLa cells.

Previously we have described an in vitro assay for the replication of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) DNA. Addition of the AAV2 nonstructural protein Rep68 to an extract from uninfected cells supports the replication of linear duplex AAV DNA. In this report, we examine replication of linear duplex AAV DNA in extracts from either uninfected or adenovirus (Ad)-infected HeLa cells. The incorporation of radiolabeled nucleotides into full-length linear AAV DNA is 50-fold greater in extracts from Ad-infected cells than in extracts from uninfected cells. In addition, the majority of the labeled full-length AAV DNA molecules synthesized in the Ad-infected extract have two newly replicated strands, whereas the majority of labeled full-length AAV DNA molecules synthesized in the uninfected extract have only one newly replicated strand. The numbers of replication initiations on original templates in the two assays are approximately the same; however, replication in the case of the Ad-infected cell extract is much more likely to result in the synthesis of a full-length AAV DNA molecule. Most of the newly replicated molecules in the assay using uninfected cell extracts are in the form of stem-loop structures. We hypothesize that Ad infection provides a helper function related to elongation during replication by a single-strand displacement mechanism. In the assay using the uninfected HeLa cell extract, replication frequently stalls before reaching the end of the genome, causing the newly synthesized strand to be displaced from the template, with a consequent folding on itself and replication back through the inverted terminal repeat, using itself as a template. In support of this conjecture, replication in the uninfected cell extract of shorter substrate molecules is more efficient, as measured by incorporation of radiolabeled nucleotides into full-length substrate DNA. In addition, when shorter substrate molecules are used as the template in the uninfected HeLa cell assay, a greater proportion of the labeled full-length substrate molecules contain two newly replicated strands. Shorter substrate molecules have no replicative advantage over full-length substrate molecules in the assay using an extract from Ad-infected cells.