An approach to crystallizing proteins by metal-mediated synthetic symmetrization

Combining the concepts of synthetic symmetrization with the approach of engineering metal‐binding sites, we have developed a new crystallization methodology termed metal‐mediated synthetic symmetrization. In this method, pairs of histidine or cysteine mutations are introduced on the surface of target proteins, generating crystal lattice contacts or oligomeric assemblies upon coordination with metal. Metal‐mediated synthetic symmetrization greatly expands the packing and oligomeric assembly possibilities of target proteins, thereby increasing the chances of growing diffraction‐quality crystals. To demonstrate this method, we designed various T4 lysozyme (T4L) and maltose‐binding protein (MBP) mutants and cocrystallized them with one of three metal ions: copper (Cu²⁺), nickel (Ni²⁺), or zinc (Zn²⁺). The approach resulted in 16 new crystal structures—eight for T4L and eight for MBP—displaying a variety of oligomeric assemblies and packing modes, representing in total 13 new and distinct crystal forms for these proteins. We discuss the potential utility of the method for crystallizing target proteins of unknown structure by engineering in pairs of histidine or cysteine residues. As an alternate strategy, we propose that the varied crystallization‐prone forms of T4L or MBP engineered in this work could be used as crystallization chaperones, by fusing them genetically to target proteins of interest.     

Crystals of TELSAM–target protein fusions that exhibit minimal crystal contacts and lack direct inter-TELSAM contacts

While conducting pilot studies into the usefulness of fusion to TELSAM polymers as a potential protein crystallization strategy, we observed novel properties in crystals of two TELSAM–target protein fusions, as follows. (i) A TELSAM–target protein fusion can crystallize more rapidly and with greater propensity than the same target protein alone. (ii) TELSAM–target protein fusions can be crystallized at low protein concentrations. This unprecedented observation suggests a route to crystallize proteins that can only be produced in microgram amounts. (iii) The TELSAM polymers themselves need not directly contact one another in the crystal lattice in order to form well-diffracting crystals. This novel observation is important because it suggests that TELSAM may be able to crystallize target proteins too large to allow direct inter-polymer contacts. (iv) Flexible TELSAM–target protein linkers can allow target proteins to find productive binding modes against the TELSAM polymer. (v) TELSAM polymers can adjust their helical rise to allow fused target proteins to make productive crystal contacts. (vi). Fusion to TELSAM polymers can stabilize weak inter-target protein crystal contacts. We report features of these TELSAM–target protein crystal structures and outline future work needed to validate TELSAM as a crystallization chaperone and determine best practices for its use.     

Thermal green protein,an extremely stable,nonaggregating fluorescent protein created by structure‐guided surface engineering

In this article, we describe the engineering and X‐ray crystal structure of Thermal Green Protein (TGP), an extremely stable, highly soluble, non‐aggregating green fluorescent protein. TGP is a soluble variant of the fluorescent protein eCGP123, which despite being highly stable, has proven to be aggregation‐prone. The X‐ray crystal structure of eCGP123, also determined within the context of this paper, was used to carry out rational surface engineering to improve its solubility, leading to TGP. The approach involved simultaneously eliminating crystal lattice contacts while increasing the overall negative charge of the protein. Despite intentional disruption of lattice contacts and introduction of high entropy glutamate side chains, TGP crystallized readily in a number of different conditions and the X‐ray crystal structure of TGP was determined to 1.9 Å resolution. The structural reasons for the enhanced stability of TGP and eCGP123 are discussed. We demonstrate the utility of using TGP as a fusion partner in various assays and significantly, in amyloid assays in which the standard fluorescent protein, EGFP, is undesirable because of aberrant oligomerization. Proteins 2015; 83:1225–1237. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Can the propensity of protein crystallization be increased by using systematic screening with metals?

Protein crystallization is one of the major bottlenecks in protein structure elucidation with new strategies being constantly developed to improve the chances of crystallization. Generally, well‐ordered epitopes possessing complementary surface and capable of producing stable inter‐protein interactions generate a regular three‐dimensional arrangement of protein molecules which eventually results in a crystal lattice. Metals, when used for crystallization, with their various coordination numbers and geometries, can generate such epitopes mediating protein oligomerization and/or establish crystal contacts. Some examples of metal‐mediated oligomerization and crystallization together with our experience on metal‐mediated crystallization of a putative rRNA methyltransferase from Sinorhizobium meliloti are presented. Analysis of crystal structures from protein data bank (PDB) using a non‐redundant data set with a 90% identity cutoff, reveals that around 67% of proteins contain at least one metal ion, with ～14% containing combination of metal ions. Interestingly, metal containing conditions in most commercially available and popular crystallization kits generally contain only a single metal ion, with combinations of metals only in a very few conditions. Based on the results presented in this review, it appears that the crystallization screens need expansion with systematic screening of metal ions that could be crucial for stabilizing the protein structure or for establishing crystal contact and thereby aiding protein crystallization.     

Extent and nature of contacts between protein molecules in crystal lattices and between subunits of protein oligomers

A survey was compiled of several characteristics of the intersubunit contacts in 58 oligomeric proteins, and of the intermolecular contacts in the lattice for 223 protein crystal structures. The total number of atoms in contact and the secondary structure elements involved are similar in the two types of interfaces. Crystal contact patches are frequently smaller than patches involved in oligomer interfaces. Crystal contacts result from more numerous interactions by polar residues, compared with a tendency toward nonpolar amino acids at oligomer interfaces. Arginine is the only amino acid prominent in both types of interfaces. Potentials of mean force for residue–residue contacts at both crystal and oligomer interfaces were derived from comparison of the number of observed residue–residue interactions with the number expected by mass action. They show that hydrophobic interactions at oligomer interfaces favor aromatic amino acids and methionine over aliphatic amino acids; and that crystal contacts form in such a way as to avoid inclusion of hydrophobic interactions. They also suggest that complex salt bridges with certain amino acid compositions might be important in oligomer formation. For a protein that is recalcitrant to crystallization, substitution of lysine residues with arginine or glutamine is a recommended strategy. Proteins 28:494–514, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Polymer-driven crystallization

Obtaining well-diffracting crystals of macromolecules remains a significant barrier to structure determination. Here we propose and test a new approach to crystallization, in which the crystallization target is fused to a polymerizing protein module, so that polymer formation drives crystallization of the target. We test the approach using a polymerization module called 2TEL, which consists of two tandem sterile alpha motif (SAM) domains from the protein translocation Ets leukemia (TEL). The 2TEL module is engineered to polymerize as the pH is lowered, which allows the subtle modulation of polymerization needed for crystal formation. We show that the 2TEL module can drive the crystallization of 11 soluble proteins, including three that resisted prior crystallization attempts. In addition, the 2TEL module crystallizes in the presence of various detergents, suggesting that it might facilitate membrane protein crystallization. The crystal structures of two fusion proteins show that the TELSAM polymer is responsible for the majority of contacts in the crystal lattice. The results suggest that biological polymers could be designed as crystallization modules.     

'Crystal lattice engineering,' an approach to engineer protein crystal contacts by creating intermolecular symmetry: crystallization and structure determination of a mutant human RNase 1 with a hydrophobic interface of leucines

A protein crystal lattice consists of surface contact regions, where the interactions of specific groups play a key role in stabilizing the regular arrangement of the protein molecules. In an attempt to control protein incorporation in a crystal lattice, a leucine zipper-like hydrophobic interface (comprising four leucine residues) was introduced into a helical region (helix 2) of the human pancreatic ribonuclease 1 (RNase 1) that was predicted to form a suitable crystallization interface. Although crystallization of wild-type RNase 1 has not yet been reported, the RNase 1 mutant having four leucines (4L-RNase 1) was successfully crystallized under several different conditions. The crystal structures were subsequently determined by X-ray crystallography by molecular replacement using the structure of bovine RNase A. The overall structure of 4L-RNase 1 is quite similar to that of the bovine RNase A, and the introduced leucine residues formed the designed crystal interface. To characterize the role of the introduced leucine residues in crystallization of RNase 1 further, the number of leucines was reduced to three or two (3L- and 2L-RNase 1, respectively). Both mutants crystallized and a similar hydrophobic interface as in 4L-RNase 1 was observed. A related approach to engineer crystal contacts at helix 3 of RNase 1 (N4L-RNase 1) was also evaluated. N4L-RNase 1 also successfully crystallized and formed the expected hydrophobic packing interface. These results suggest that appropriate introduction of a leucine zipper-like hydrophobic interface can promote intermolecular symmetry for more efficient protein crystallization in crystal lattice engineering efforts.     

Racemic crystallography of synthetic protein enantiomers used to determine the X‐ray structure of plectasin by direct methods

We describe the use of racemic crystallography to determine the X‐ray structure of the natural product plectasin, a potent antimicrobial protein recently isolated from fungus. The protein enantiomers L ‐plectasin and D ‐plectasin were prepared by total chemical synthesis; interestingly, L ‐plectasin showed the expected antimicrobial activity, while D ‐plectasin was devoid of such activity. The mirror image proteins were then used for racemic crystallization. Synchrotron X‐ray diffraction data were collected to atomic resolution from a racemic plectasin crystal; the racemate crystallized in the achiral centrosymmetric space group P1 with one L ‐plectasin molecule and one D ‐plectasin molecule forming the unit cell. Dimer‐like intermolecular interactions between the protein enantiomers were observed, which may account for the observed extremely low solvent content (13%–15%) and more highly ordered nature of the racemic crystals. The structure of the plectasin molecule was well defined for all 40 amino acids and was generally similar to the previously determined NMR structure, suggesting minimal impact of the crystal packing on the plectasin conformation.     

New surface contacts formed upon reductive lysine methylation: Improving the probability of protein crystallization

Surface lysine methylation (SLM) is a technique for improving the rate of success of protein crystallization by chemically methylating lysine residues. The exact mechanism by which SLM enhances crystallization is still not clear. To study these mechanisms, and to analyze the conditions where SLM will provide the optimal benefits for rescuing failed crystallization experiments, we compared 40 protein structures containing N,N-dimethyl-lysine (dmLys) to a nonredundant set of 18,972 nonmethylated structures from the PDB. By measuring the relative frequency of intermolecular contacts (where contacts are defined as interactions between the residues in proximity with a distance of 3.5 Å or less) of basic residues in the methylated versus nonmethylated sets, dmLys-Glu contacts are seen more frequently than Lys-Glu contacts. Based on observation of the 10 proteins with both native and methylated structures, we propose that the increased rate of contact for dmLys-Glu is due to both a slight increase in the number of amine-carboxyl H-bonds and to the formation of methyl C–H···O interactions. By comparing the relative contact frequencies of dmLys with other residues, the mechanism by which methylation of lysines improves the formation of crystal contacts appears to be similar to that of Lys to Arg mutation. Moreover, analysis of methylated structures with the surface entropy reduction (SER) prediction server suggests that in many cases SLM of predicted SER sites may contribute to improved crystallization. Thus, tools that analyze protein sequences and mark residues for SER mutation may identify proteins with good candidate sites for SLM.     

Rapid Isolation of Single-chain Antibodies for Structural Genomics

High throughput approaches to structural genomics requires expression, purification, and crystallization of proteins derived from predicted open reading frames cloned into a host organism, typically E. coli. Early results from this approach suggest that the success rate of obtaining well diffracting crystals from eukaryotic proteins is disappointingly low. A proven method of improving the odds of crystallization is formation of a complex with a conformation-stabilizing partner of known structure that is easily crystallized. Such complexes are also able to engage in different crystal contacts than the original protein by itself. Fab fragments derived from monoclonal antibodies have been successfully used for this purpose for a variety of proteins, however conventional methods for the isolation of monoclonal antibodies from hybridomas are time consuming and expensive. We are exploring the use of phage display to generate recombinant antibodies to target proteins that can be used to obtain co-complexes to facilitate crystallization and structural determination. We are using a large, human single-chain Fv (scFv) library to select for antibodies that bind to a panel of Leishmania major target proteins. Thirteen out of 16 target proteins yielded good binders after three rounds of enrichment. A total of 55 distinct scFvs were identified, with five targets each yielding at least five different scFvs. Individual clones were analyzed for binding specificity and soluble scFv can be readily produced and purified via the appended His₆ epitope tag. Using immunoaffinity chromatography, eight scFv target protein pairs were identified that exhibit stable complex formation and are suitable for co-crystallization trials.     

New approaches towards the understanding of integral membrane proteins: A structural perspective on G protein‐coupled receptors

Three‐dimensional structure determination of integral membrane proteins has advanced in unprecedented detail our understanding of mechanistic events of how ion channels, transporters, receptors, and enzymes function. This exciting progress required a tremendous amount of methods development, as exemplified here with G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs): Optimizing the production of GPCRs in recombinant hosts; increasing the probability of crystal formation using high‐affinity ligands, nanobodies, and minimal G proteins for co‐crystallization, thus stabilizing receptors into one conformation; using the T4 lysozyme technology and other fusion partners to promote crystal contacts; advancing crystallization methods including the development of novel detergents, and miniaturization and automation of the lipidic cubic phase crystallization method; the concept of conformational thermostabilization of GPCRs; and developing microfocus X‐ray synchrotron technologies to analyze small GPCR crystals. However, despite immense progress to explain how GPCRs function, many receptors pose intractable hurdles to structure determination at this time. Three emerging methods, serial femtosecond crystallography, micro electron diffraction, and single particle electron cryo‐microscopy, hold promise to overcome current limitations in structural membrane biology.     

Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts.

Protein-protein contacts in monomeric protein crystal structures have been analyzed and compared to the physiological protein-protein contacts in oligomerization. A number of features differentiate the crystal-packing contacts from the natural contacts occurring in multimeric proteins. The area of the protein surface patches involved in packing contacts is generally smaller and its amino acid composition is indistinguishable from that of the protein surface accessible to the solvent. The fraction of protein surface in crystal contacts is very variable and independent of the number of packing contacts. The thermal motion at the crystal packing interface and that of the protein core, even for large packing interfaces, though the tendency is to be closer to that of the core. These results suggest that protein crystallization depends on random protein-protein interactions, which have little in common with physiological protein-protein recognition processes, and that the possibility of engineering macromolecular crystallization to improve crystal quality could be widened.     

Mesoscopic surfactant organization and membrane protein crystallization

The paucity of detailed X-ray crystallographic structures of integral membrane proteins arises from substantive technical obstacles in the overexpression of multimilligram quantities of protein, and in the crystallization of purified protein-detergent complexes (PDCs). With rare exception, crystal contacts within the lattice are mediated by protein-protein interaction, and the detergent surrounding the protein behaves as a disordered solvent. The addition and use of surfactants that display mesoscopic self-assembly behavior in membrane protein crystallization experiments presents a novel alternative strategy. Well-ordered crystals of the water channel human aquaporin-1 (hAQP1) that diffract to 4 A resolution have been obtained with this approach.     

Crystal packing analysis of Rhodopsin crystals

Oligomerization has been proposed as one of several mechanisms to regulate the activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but little is known about the structure of GPCR oligomers. Crystallographic analyses of two new crystal forms of rhodopsin reveal an interaction surface which may be involved in the formation of functional dimers or oligomers. New crystallization conditions lead to the formation of two crystal forms with similar rhodopsin-rhodopsin interactions, but changes in the crystal lattice are induced by the addition of different surfactant additives. However, the intermolecular interactions between rhodopsin molecules in these crystal structures may reflect the contacts necessary for the maintenance of dimers or oligomers in rod outer segment membranes. Similar contacts may assist in the formation of dimers or oligomers in other GPCRs as well. These new dimers are compared with other models proposed by crystallography or EM and AFM studies. The inter-monomer surface contacts are different for each model, but several of these models coincide in implicating helix I, II, and H-8 as contributors to the main contact surface stabilizing the dimers.     

CRK: An evolutionary approach for distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from crystal contacts

Protein crystals contain two different types of interfaces: biologically relevant ones, observed in protein–protein complexes and oligomeric proteins, and nonspecific ones, corresponding to crystal lattice contacts. Because of the increasing complexity of the objects being tackled in structural biology, distinguishing biological contacts from crystal contacts is not always a trivial task and can lead to wrong interpretation of macromolecular structures. We devised an approach (CRK, core‐rim K_a/K_s ratio) for distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from nonspecific ones. Given a protein–protein interface, CRK finds a set of homologs to the sequences of the proteins involved in the interface, retrieves and aligns the corresponding coding sequences, on which it carries out a residue‐by‐residue K_a/K_s ratio (ω) calculation. It divides interface residues into a “rim” and a “core” set and analyzes the selection pressure on the residues belonging to the two sets. We developed and tested CRK on different datasets and test cases, consisting of biologically relevant contacts, nonspecific ones or of both types. The method proves very effective in distinguishing the two categories of interfaces, with an overall accuracy rate of 84%. As it relies on different principles when compared with existing tools, CRK is optimally suited to be used in combination with them. In addition, CRK has potential applications in the validation of structures of oligomeric proteins and protein complexes. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Reprint of "Crystal packing analysis of Rhodopsin crystals" [J. Struct. Biol. 158 (2007) 455-462

Oligomerization has been proposed as one of several mechanisms to regulate the activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but little is known about the structure of GPCR oligomers. Crystallographic analyses of two new crystal forms of rhodopsin reveal an interaction surface which may be involved in the formation of functional dimers or oligomers. New crystallization conditions lead to the formation of two crystal forms with similar rhodopsin-rhodopsin interactions, but changes in the crystal lattice are induced by the addition of different surfactant additives. However, the intermolecular interactions between rhodopsin molecules in these crystal structures may reflect the contacts necessary for the maintenance of dimers or oligomers in rod outer segment membranes. Similar contacts may assist in the formation of dimers or oligomers in other GPCRs as well. These new dimers are compared with other models proposed by crystallography or EM and AFM studies. The inter-monomer surface contacts are different for each model, but several of these models coincide in implicating helix I, II, and H-8 as contributors to the main contact surface stabilizing the dimers.     

Variability of conformations at crystal contacts in BPTI represent true low-energy structures: correspondence among lattice packing and molecular dynamics structures.

The structures of five basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) molecules are compared to establish the extent and nature of the conformational variability resulting from crystal packing effects. BPTI is an ideal system to evaluate such factors because of the availability of high resolution X-ray models of five different BPTI structures, each in a different crystal packing environment. Differences observed among the structures are found to be distributed throughout the molecule, although the regions that display most variability are associated with the loop structures (residues 14-17 and 24-29). The regions of structure that show the largest rms deviations from the mean of the five packing motifs correlate well with the presence of intermolecular contacts in the crystal lattice. For most of the molecules there is also a correspondence between a larger number of intermolecular contacts and systematically higher B-factors, although it is not apparent whether this is induced by the crystal contact or results from the fact that the contacts are made predominantly through surface loops. The conformational differences seen among the X-ray models constitute more than local shifts at the lattice contact surfaces, and in fact involve in some cases the making and breaking of intramolecular H-bonds. The magnitudes of the differences among packing models are significantly larger than those usually associated with changes induced by mutagenesis; for instance; the structural differences at the site of mutation observed on removing an internal disulfide from the molecule are significantly less than those associated with lattice contact effects. The crystal packing conformations are compared to representative structures of BPTI generated during a 96-psec molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. This comparison shows a high level of correspondence between the protein flexibility indicated by the X-ray and MD analyses, and specifically between those regions that are most variable. This suggests that the regions that show most variability among the crystal packing models are not artifacts of crystallization, but rather represent true low-energy conformers that have been preferentially selected by crystallization factors.     

High-resolution X-ray crystal structures of human gammaD crystallin (1.25 A) and the R58H mutant (1.15 A) associated with aculeiform cataract

Several human cataracts have been linked to mutations in the gamma crystallin gene. One of these is the aculeiform cataract, which is caused by an R58H mutation in gammaD crystallin. We have shown previously that this cataract is caused by crystallization of the mutant protein, which is an order of magnitude less soluble than the wild-type. Here, we report the very high-resolution crystal structures of the mutant and wild-type proteins. Both proteins crystallize in the same space group and lattice. Thus, a strict comparison of the protein-protein and protein-water intermolecular interactions in the two crystal lattices is possible. Overall, the differences between the mutant and wild-type structures are small. At position 58, the mutant protein loses the direct ion-pair intermolecular interaction present in the wild-type, due to the differences between histidine and arginine at the atomic level; the interaction in the mutant is mediated by water molecules. Away from the mutation site, the mutant and wild-type lattice structures differ in the identity of side-chains that occupy alternate conformations. Since the interactions in the crystal phase are very similar for the two proteins, we conclude that the reduction in the solubility of the mutant is mainly due to the effect of the R58H mutation in the solution phase. The results presented here are also important as they are the first high-resolution X-ray structures of human gamma crystallins.     

Perfect hemihedral twinning in crystals of the γ-subunit of translation initiation factor 2 from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Sulfolobus solfataricus</Emphasis>: Cause and effect

The crystal structure of the γ-subunit of translation initiation factor 2 from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus (SsoIF2γ) has been solved based on perfectly hemihedral twinned data. The protein was cocrystallized with the 10-fold molar excess of GTP analog (GDPCP) over protein. However, no nucleotide was found in the structure, and the model demonstrated the apo form of the protein. Two slightly different molecules in the asymmetric unit of the crystal are related by the non-crystallographic 2-fold axis and form a tightly associated dimer. This dimer is stabilized by an intermolecular hydrophobic core and hydrogen bonds. Lack of GDPCP in the nucleotide-binding pocket of the γ-subunit and significant excess of dimers over monomers in the crystallization solution suggest that these dimers are the building blocks of the crystal. Contrary to SsoIF2γ monomers, these dimers are able to crystallize in two oppositely oriented slightly different crystal domains, thus forming a twinned crystal. Comparison of crystallization conditions for the twinned and untwinned crystals of apo SsoIF2γ showed that stabilization of the dimers in the solution may be caused by higher sodium salt concentration. Since amino acid residues involved in intermolecular contacts in the dimer are responsible for binding of the γand α-subunits within SsoIF2, increase in sodium salt concentration may prevent functioning of SsoIF2 in the cell.     

A synergistic approach to protein crystallization: Combination of a fixed‐arm carrier with surface entropy reduction

Protein crystallographers are often confronted with recalcitrant proteins not readily crystallizable, or which crystallize in problematic forms. A variety of techniques have been used to surmount such obstacles: crystallization using carrier proteins or antibody complexes, chemical modification, surface entropy reduction, proteolytic digestion, and additive screening. Here we present a synergistic approach for successful crystallization of proteins that do not form diffraction quality crystals using conventional methods. This approach combines favorable aspects of carrier‐driven crystallization with surface entropy reduction. We have generated a series of maltose binding protein (MBP) fusion constructs containing different surface mutations designed to reduce surface entropy and encourage crystal lattice formation. The MBP advantageously increases protein expression and solubility, and provides a streamlined purification protocol. Using this technique, we have successfully solved the structures of three unrelated proteins that were previously unattainable. This crystallization technique represents a valuable rescue strategy for protein structure solution when conventional methods fail.