Altered expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-7 and GHox-8 in the limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos.

It has been suggested that the reciprocal expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-8 and GHox-7 by the apical ectodermal ridge and subjacent limb mesoderm might be involved in regulating the proximodistal outgrowth of the developing chick limb bud. In the present study the expression of GHox-7 and GHox-8 has been examined by in situ and dot blot hybridization in the developing limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos. The limb buds of homozygous mutant limbless embryos form at the proper time in development (stage 17/18), but never develop an apical ectodermal ridge, fail to undergo normal elongation, and eventually degenerate. At stage 18, which is shortly following the formation of the limb bud, the expression of GHox-7 is considerably reduced (about 3-fold lower) in the mesoderm of limbless mutant limb buds compared to normal limb bud mesoderm. By stages 20 and 21, as the limb buds of limbless embryos cease outgrowth, GHox-7 expression in limbless mesoderm declines to very low levels, whereas GHox-7 expression increases in the mesoderm of normal limb buds which are undergoing outgrowth. In contrast to GHox-7, expression of GHox-8 in limbless mesoderm at stage 18 is quantitatively similar to its expression in normal limb bud mesoderm, and in limbless and normal mesoderm GHox-8 expression is highly localized in the anterior mesoderm of the limb bud. In normal limb buds, GHox-8 is also expressed in high amounts by the apical ectodermal ridge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Experimental manipulation leading to induction of dorsal ectodermal ridges on normal limb buds results in a phenocopy of the eudiplopodia chick mutant

Elongation of chick limb buds depends on the presence of the apical ectodermal ridge which is induced by subjacent limb bud mesoderm. Recombination experiments have shown that the limb bud mesoderm loses the capacity to induce ridges by late stage 17. Moreover, in normal limb development only one ridge forms. However, in the eudiplopodia chick mutant accessory ectodermal ridges form on the dorsal surface of limb buds as late as stage 22. Tissue recombinant experiments show that the mutation affects the ectoderm, extending the time it responds to ridge induction (Fraser and Abbott, 1971a, Fraser and Abbott, 1971b while the mesoderm is normal. The result is polydactyly, with extra digits dorsal to the normal digits. Because eudiplopodia limb bud dorsal mesoderm can induce ridges at stage 22 but is unaffected by the gene, genetically normal dorsal limb bud mesoderm may also be able to induce ridges after stage 17. To test this possibility we grafted stages 14–18 flank ectoderm to normal limb bud dorsal mesoderm and found that mesoderm from stages 17 through 20 was able to induce a ridge and subsequently dorsal digits developed. Limbs with duplicate digits were similar to eudiplopodia limbs. In other experiments, stage 18, 19, and 20 leg bud dorsal ectoderm did not form ridges when grafted to leg bud dorsal mesoderm of the same stage, indicating a lack of response to the mesoderm. Finally, the inductive capacity of limb bud mesoderm appeared to be reduced compared to mesoderm at pre-limb bud stages. These experiments demonstrate a spatially generalized potential in limb bud dorsal mesoderm to induce ridges during the stages when the apical ridge is induced. The determination of where the ridge will form and the acquired inability of limb bud dorsal ectoderm to respond to induction by underlying mesoderm are necessary early pattern forming events which assure that a single proximodistal limb axis will form.     

The in vitro maintenance of the apical ectodermal ridge of the chick embryo wing bud: an assay for polarizing activity.

We have devised an in vitro bioassay for limb bud polarizing activity in the chick embryo. This assay has proven to be a relatively quick and effective test for a morphogenetic factor asymmetrically distributed in the limb bud which is capable of maintaining or thickening the apical ectodermal ridge.A small section of the preaxial border of the chick embryo wing bud was cultured alone, with tissue from the posterior border, mid-dorsal or anterior corner of a second donor wing, or from the flank. The tissue from the preaxial border (responding tissue) consisted of mesoderm with overlying ectoderm and apical ectodermal ridge. When the responding tissue was cultured alone, with flank, or with anterior corner limb tissue, the apical ectodermal ridge flattened in 24–36 hr and many macrophages appeared in the underlying mesoderm. When cultured with posterior border limb tissue however, the apical ridge of the responding tissue remained thickened for up to 48 hr., and no macrophages appear in the underlying mesoderm. The behavior of responding tissue was intermediate between these two extremes when cultured with mid-dorsal limb tissue. The morphogenetic activity assayed by this procedure thus seems to be present as a gradient in the wing bud, with activity decreasing from posterior to anterior. Contact with the responding tissue is not required to enable posterior border tissue to elicit ridge thickening and inhibit the cell death.     

FGF7 and FGF10 directly induce the apical ectodermal ridge in chick embryos.

During vertebrate limb development, the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) plays a vital role in both limb initiation and distal outgrowth of the limb bud. In the early chick embryo the prelimb bud mesoderm induces the AER in the overlying ectoderm. However, the direct inducer of the AER remains unknown. Here we report that FGF7 and FGF10, members of the fibroblast growth factor family, are the best candidates for the direct inducer of the AER. FGF7 induces an ectopic AER in the flank ectoderm of the chick embryo in a different manner from FGF1, -2, and -4 and activates the expression of Fgf8, an AER marker gene, in a cultured flank ectoderm without the mesoderm. Remarkably, FGF7 and FGF10 applied in the back induced an ectopic AER in the dorsal median ectoderm. Our results suggest that FGF7 and FGF10 directly induce the AER in the ectoderm both of the flank and of the dorsal midline and that these two regions have the competence for AER induction. Formation of the AER of the dorsal median ectoderm in the chick embryo is likely to appear as a vestige of the dorsal fin of the ancestors.     

An in vitro Analogue of Early Chick Limb Bud Outgrowth

Our culture system appears to represent an in vitro analogue of early chick limb morphogenesis. Organized mesodermal cell accumulations resembling limb buds were derived from a monolayer of limb mesoderm cells when covered by limb ectoderm which included the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). The ridge retained its normal configuration when grown over a limb mesoderm monolayer and the mesoderm cells accumulated under the ridge to form a multilayered structure (10–25 cells in thickness) with the characteristic shape of a limb bud. Ectoderm which did not include the ridge failed to promote the formation of limb-like mesodermal accumulations thus the action of the ridge appears to be specific. The AER-elicited expression of mesodermal cell behaviour leading to early limb outgrowth is discussed in terms of possible morphogenetic mechanisms involved i.e. differential mitosis, cell migration, changes in cell shape and especially the adhesive properties of the cells.     

Pattern formation in epithelial development: the vertebrate limb and feather bud spacing.

The ectoderm of the vertebrate limb and feather bud are epithelia that provide good models for epithelial patterning in vertebrate development. At the tip of chick and mouse limb buds is a thickening, the apical ectodermal ridge, which is essential for limb bud outgrowth. The signal from the ridge to the underlying mesoderm involves fibroblast growth factors. The non-ridge ectoderm specifies the dorsoventral pattern of the bud and Wnt7a is a dorsalizing signal. The development of the ridge involves an interaction between dorsal cells that express radical fringe and those that do not. There are striking similarities between the signals and genes involved in patterning the limb ectoderm and the epithelia of the Drosophila imaginal disc that gives rise to the wing. The spacing of feather buds involves signals from the epidermis to the underlying mesenchyme, which again include Wnt7a and fibroblast growth factors.     

Distribution and possible function of an adrenomedullin-like peptide in the developing chick limb bud

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a multifunctional peptide that exhibits discrete domains of expression during mouse embryogenesis consistent with a role in regulating growth and differentiation during morphogenesis. Here we report that AM immunoreactivity is present at high levels throughout the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) of the chick limb bud as the AER is directing the outgrowth and patterning of underlying limb mesoderm. Immunostaining is particularly strong along the surfaces of the contiguous cells of the AER. AM immunoreactivity attenuates as the AER regresses and is absent from the distal apical ectoderm of stage 20 limbless mutant limb buds which fail to develop an AER. To explore the possible role of AM in AER activity, we examined the effect of exogenous AM and an AM inhibitor on the in vitro morphogenesis of limb mesoderm, cultured in the presence and absence of the AER. Although exogenous AM cannot substitute for the AER in promoting outgrowth of limb mesoderm in vitro, a specific AM antagonist, AM(22-52), impairs the outgrowth and proliferation of limb mesoderm cultured in the presence of the AER. This is consistent with the possibility that inhibition of endogenous AM activity in the AER impairs the ability of the AER to promote limb morphogenesis. Taken together, these studies suggest that an AM-like molecule may function in an autocrine fashion to regulate some aspect of AER activity.     

Evidence that the limb bud ectoderm is required for survival of the underlying mesoderm

The limb forms from a bud of mesoderm encased in a hull of ectoderm that grows out from the flank of the embryo. Coordinated signaling between the limb mesoderm and ectoderm is critical for normal limb outgrowth and patterning. The apical ectodermal ridge (AER), found at the distal tip, is a rich source of signaling molecules and has been proposed to specify distal structures and maintain the survival of cells in the underlying distal mesoderm. The dorsal and ventral non-AER ectoderm is also a source of signaling molecules and is important for dorsal–ventral patterning of the limb bud. Here we determine if this ectoderm provides cell survival signals by surgically removing the dorsal or ventral ectoderm during early chicken limb bud development and assaying for programmed cell death. We find that, similar to the AER, removal of the dorsal or ventral non-AER ectoderm results in massive cell death in the underlying mesoderm. In addition, although a re-epithelialization occurs, we find perturbations in the timing of Shh expression and, for the case of the dorsal ectoderm removal, defects in soft tissue and skeletal development along the proximal–distal axis. Furthermore, ectoderm substitution experiments show that the survival signal produced by the dorsal limb ectoderm is specific. Thus, our results argue that the non-AER ectoderm, like the AER, provides a specific survival signal to the underlying mesoderm that is necessary for normal limb development and conclusions drawn from experiments in which the non-AER ectoderm is removed, need to take into consideration this observation.     

Inductive and axial properties of prospective wing-bud mesoderm in the chick embryo

Prospective wing-bud mesoderm, stripped of ectoderm mechanically through the use of glass needles, or chemically by means of EDTA or trypsin, was obtained from donor embryos of stages 11 through 21. Grafts were made in both homopleural (aadd and apdv) and heteropleural (aadv and apdd) combinations to the right flank of host embryos of the same range of stages. Flank ectoderm from the host healed over the graft in a few hours and, in combinations between donors and hosts in the range of stages 12 through 17, the composite formed, with high frequency, a limb bud capped by an apical ectodermal ridge, and then developed into a supernumerary wing in which all proximodistal levels were represented. When either member of the combination was older than stage 17, only incomplete limbs, if any, were formed. Regardless of their orientation on the host, the supernumerary limbs always showed the axial characteristics appropriate to their side of origin.Supernumerary wings failed to form if the grafts were inserted into a space tunneled between flank ectoderm and its underlying mesoderm. If the covering ectoderm were deliberately torn and forced to heal over the graft, however, an ectodermal ridge formed and a supernumerary limb developed.It is concluded, therefore, that: (1) the wing-bud mesoderm, appropriately combined with flank ectoderm, has the property of morphological and axial self-differentiation by stage 12; (2) the apical ectodermal ridge is induced in flank ectoderm by prospective wing-bud mesoderm; (3) this inductive power is restricted to prospective wing-bud mesoderm from donors of stages 12 through 17; (4) the response competence is limited to flank ectoderm that has healed over the mesoderm; and (5) this competence is lost by the end of stage 17.     

Inductive activity and enduring cellular constitution of a supernumerary apical ectodermal ridge grafted to the limb bud of the chick embryo.

Apical ectodermal ridges (AERs) isolated from 3- to 4-day chick and quail embryos were prepared by means of trypsinization and microdissection and then were grafted to the dorsal or ventral side of a host chick wing bud. They induced supernumerary limb outgrowths from the host bud showing, respectively, a bidorsal or biventral organization, as determined by the patterns of feather germs. The grafted ridge cells persisted, as revealed by histological sections of supernumerary chick limb parts growing under the influence of quail AERs, whose cells are readily distinguished after application of the Feulgen reagent.These results show that the AER induces limb outgrowth regardless of whether it is associated with dorsal or ventral limb ectoderm and that its continued existence is not dependent on contributions of ectodermal cells from the opposed ectodermal faces of the limb bud. The AER is pictured as maintaining the subjacent mesoderm in a condition of developmental plasticity without specifying its differentiation with respect to the proximodistal axis. It remains uncertain whether the positional values of cells that develop under the influence of the AER arise within these cells themselves or appear in response to influences from proximal sources.     

Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ectodermal ridge removal

A spatiotemporal pattern of cell death occurred in the chick wing and leg bud mesoderm after removal of apical ectodermal ridge at stages 18–20. Cells died in a region extending from the limb bud distal surface to 150–200 μm into the mesoderm. Limb buds from which ridge was removed at later stages in development did not exhibit a spatiotemporal pattern of cell death. In control experiments in which dorsal ectoderm was removed, a pattern of cell death did not occur. Removal of the ridge and part of the 150- to 200-μm zone of prospective cell death resulted in cell death in an area approximately equal to the amount of the zone remaining. After removal of all of the prospective zone of cell death plus the apical ridge, cell death was observed in the remaining limb bud mesoderm. In these limb buds, cell death occurred in a region in which it had not been seen in limb bud with apical ridge alone removed. We conclude that at stages 18–20 the mesodermal cells 150–200 μm beneath the ridge require the apical ridge to survive. More proximal mesodermal cells do not die after ridge removal alone, but apparently require the presence of the more distal mesoderm to survive. Whether this is a requirement for something intrinsic to the distal mesoderm or something it possesses by way of the ridge is unknown. After stage 23, the limb mesoderm cells do not die when the apical ridge is removed. Nevertheless, at the later stages, ridge continues to be required for limb bud proximal-distal elongation and the differentiation of distal limb elements.     

Disrupting the establishment of polarizing activity by teratogen exposure.

Between days 9.5 and 10, the forelimb buds of developing murine embryos progress from stage 1 which are just beginning to express shh and whose posterior mesoderm has only weak polarizing activity to stage 2 limbs with a distinguishable shh expression domain and full polarizing activity. We find that exposure on day 9.5 to teratogens that induce the loss of posterior skeletal elements disrupts the polarizing activity of the stage 2 postaxial mesoderm and polarizing activity is not subsequently restored. The ontogeny of expression of the mesodermal markers shh, ptc, bmp2, and hoxd-12 and 13, as well as the ectodermal markers wnt7a, fgf4, fgf8, cx43, and p21 occurred normally in day 9.5 teratogen-exposed limb buds. At stage 3, the treated limb apical ectodermal ridge usually possessed no detectable abnormalities, but with continued outgrowth postaxial deficiencies became evident. Recombining control, stage matched limb bud ectoderm with treated mesoderm prior to ZPA grafting restored the duplicating activity of treated ZPA tissue. We conclude that in addition to shh an early ectoderm-dependent signal is required for the establishment of the mouse ZPA and that this factor is dependent on the posterior ectoderm.     

Limb outgrowth in the chick embryo induced by dissociated and reaggregated cells of the apical ectodermal ridge.

Mesodermal cores of the stage 19 chick leg bud were capped with an intact apical ectodermal ridge (AER) or with strips cut from centrifugal pellets formed from Pronase-dissociated AERs. They were then covered with embryonic back-skin ectoderm and grown as grafts to the somite region of a host embryo. Control mesoderms were capped with centrifugal aggregates of nonridge limb ectoderm or similarly treated back-skin ectoderm, with ethanol-killed AERs or with no ectodermal cells other than the enveloping back-skin ectoderm.Controls were vascularized slowly and atypically and showed little outgrowth, forming only proximal skeletal structures. Recombinants equipped with AER cells were vascularized more fully and promptly and began vigorous growth after brief delay, forming legs with all skeletal segments represented, including claw-tipped toes. The latter were arranged in anteroposterior order corresponding to the original polarity of the mesoderm.Histological sections of recombinants made with cytologically distinctive quail AERs reveal that the cap of ridge cells, whether initially intact or reaggregated beneath the back-skin envelope, undergo a period of reorganization, forming a typical AER at the apex of the chimeric appendage after 48 hr. Meanwhile vigorous growth of the recombinant continues.These results show that the AER can cooperate with nonlimb ectoderm in promoting the morphogenesis of successively more distal levels of the limb skeleton. They also show that dissociated ridge cells can reorganize a typical AER at the apex of the limb mesoblast, meanwhile exercising their inductive effect on it.     

Engrailed-1 misexpression in chick embryos prevents apical ridge formation but preserves segregation of dorsal and ventral ectodermal compartments

Using lineage tracers, we recently showed dorsal and ventral ectodermal compartments along the sides of the body in chick embryos. The compartments are formed both in presumptive limb-forming regions where they position the apical ridge and also in presumptive interlimb (flank). Here we show, using a novel technique combining fate mapping and in situ hybridisation, that the ventral compartment coincides with the Engrailed-1 (En-1) domain of expression. This coincidence suggests that En-1 could maintain the ventral compartment and be necessary for apical ridge formation. To test this hypothesis, we ectopically expressed En-1 via retroviral transfer and then examined limb development and cell lineage restriction in the ectoderm. En-1 misexpression can completely prevent formation of both normal limbs and ectopic limbs induced in the flank by application of FGF-2. In both cases, there are no morphological signs of apical ectodermal ridge formation and expression of ridge-associated genes is undetectable. In striking contrast, the lineage restriction between dorsal and ventral ectoderm is not altered. Therefore, En-1 is involved in the regulation of ridge formation but not compartment maintenance.     

Normal development of the skeleton in chick limb buds devoid of dorsal ectoderm

It has been suggested that the ectoderm on the dorsal and ventral faces of the limb bud plays a part in controlling the pattern of cartilage differentiation. To test this, the dorsal wing bud ectoderm in the chick embryo was destroyed by irradiation with ultraviolet light at stage 17-19, at the very beginning of limb bud development, but the apical ectodermal ridge was spared. The irradiated ectoderm disappeared within 24 hr (by stage 23-24) and did not regenerate thereafter; thus the dorsal surface of the limb bud was kept denuded throughout most of the period of skeletal pattern formation. By 6 or 7 days after the irradiation (stage 35), when the rudiments of all the adult skeletal elements are normally present in recognizable form, the irradiated wings could be placed into two categories, those that were approximately normal in shape and those that had curled dorsally. All of these limbs were reduced in size, to varying degrees, when compared to their controls and lacked dorsal soft tissues. The limbs that were normal in shape, however, even though sometimes denuded over practically the whole extent of their dorsal surface, almost always had a complete and normally proportioned cartilage pattern, suggesting that ectoderm (other than the apical ectodermal ridge) does not exert any direct control over the development of the limb cartilage pattern. However, many of those limbs that had curled as a result of the irradiation did have major pattern deformities, suggesting that the topology of cartilage differentiation does depend on the shape of the limb bud.     

Posterior apical ectodermal ridge removal in the chick wing bud triggers a series of events resulting in defective anterior pattern formation

The ability of the anterior apical ectodermal ridge to promote outgrowth in the chick wing bud when disconnected from posterior apical ridge was examined by rotating the posterior portion of the stage-19/20 to stage-21 wing bud around its anteroposterior axis. This permitted contact between the anterior and posterior mesoderm, without removing wing bud tissue. In a small but significant number of cases (10/54), anterior structures (digit 2) formed spatially isolated from posterior structures (digits 3 and 4). Thus, continuity with posterior ridge is not a prerequisite for anterior-ridge function in the wing bud. Nevertheless, posterior-ridge removal does result in anterior limb truncation. To investigate events leading to anterior truncation, we examined cell death patterns in the wing bud following posterior-ridge removal. We observed an abnormal area of necrosis along the posterior border of the wing bud at 6-12 h following posterior-ridge removal. This was followed by necrosis in the distal, anterior mesoderm at 48 h postoperatively and subsequent anterior truncation. Clearly, healthy posterior limb bud mesoderm is needed for anterior limb bud survival and development. We propose that anterior truncation is the direct result of anterior mesodermal cell death and that this may not be related to positional specification of anterior cells. In our view, cell death of anterior mesoderm, after posterior mesoderm removal, should not be used as evidence for a role in position specification by the polarizing zone during the limb bud stages of development. We suggest that the posterior mesoderm that maintains the anterior mesoderm need not be restricted to the mapped polarizing zone, but is more extensively distributed in the limb bud.     

Cyclic AMP derivatives stimulate the chondrogenic differentiation of the mesoderm subjacent to the apical ectodermal ridge of the chick limb bud.

Recent studies indicate that one of the major functions of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) of the embryonic chick limb bud is to maintain mesenchymal cells directly subjacent to it (i.e., cells extending 0.4-0.5 mm from the AER) in a labile, undifferentiated condition. Furthermore, when mesenchymal cells are freed from the AER's influence, either artifically or as a result of normal polarized proximal-to-distal limb outgrowth, they are freed to commence cytodifferentiation. In a preliminary attempt to investigate at a molecular level the mechanism by which the AER exerts its "negative" effect on the cytodifferentiation of subridge mesenchymal cells, we have examined the effect of a variety of agents that elevate cyclic AMP levels on the chondrogenic differentiation of the unspecialized subridge mesoderm of the limb bud in an organ culture system. Dibutyryl- and 8-hydroxy-cyclic AMP elicit a dose-dependent increase in the rate and amount of cartilage matrix formation and a corresponding dose-dependent increase in sulfated glycosaminoglycan accumulation by subridge mesoderm explants. The stimulatory effect of suboptimal concentrations of cyclic AMP derivatives is potentiated by the addition of theophylline. The stimulatory effect is limited to cyclic AMP derivatives, since dibutyryl-cyclic GMP and 5'-AMP have no effect. Thus agents that elevate intracellular cyclic AMP levels stimulate the chondrogenic differentiation of the unspecialized subridge mesoderm of the embryonic chick limb bud.