Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of U snRNPs: definition of a nuclear location signal in the Sm core domain that binds a transport receptor independently of the m3G cap.

We have investigated the nuclear transport of U1 and U5 snRNPs by microinjection studies in oocytes from Xenopus laevis using snRNP particles prepared by reconstitution in vitro. Competition studies with snRNPs showed that the Sm core domain of U1 snRNPs contains a nuclear location signal that acts independently of the m3G cap. The transport of U1 snRNP can be blocked by saturation with competitor U1 snRNPs or by U5 snRNPs, which indicates that the signals on the respective Sm core domains interact with the same transport receptors. Further, by using a minimal U1 snRNP particle reconstituted in vitro and containing only the Sm core RNP domain and lacking stem-loops I to III of U1 RNA, we show that this is targeted actively to the nucleus, in spite of the absence of the m3G cap. This indicates that under certain conditions the NLS in the Sm core domain not only is an essential, but may also be a sufficient condition for nuclear targeting. We propose that the RNA structure of a given snRNP particle determines at least in part whether the particle's m3G cap is required for nuclear transport or can be dispensed with.     

Analysis of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) in Trypanosoma brucei: structural organization and protein components of the spliced leader RNP.

trans splicing in Trypanosoma brucei involves the ligation of the 40-nucleotide spliced leader (SL) to each of the exons of large, polycistronic pre-mRNAs and requires the function of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs). We have identified and characterized snRNP complexes of SL, U2, U4, and U6 RNAs in T. brucei extracts by a combination of glycerol gradient sedimentation, CsCl density centrifugation, and anti-m3G immunoprecipitation. Both the SL RNP and the U4/U6 snRNP contain salt-stable cores; the U2 snRNP, in contrast to other eucaryotic snRNPs, is not stable under stringent ionic conditions. Two distinct complexes of U6 RNA were found, a U6 snRNP and a U4/U6 snRNP. The structure of the SL RNP was analyzed in detail by oligonucleotide-directed RNase H protection and by in vitro reconstitution. Our results indicate that the 3' half of SL RNA constitutes the core protein-binding domain and that protein components of the SL RNP also bind to the U2 and U4 RNAs. Using antisense RNA affinity chromatography, we identified a set of low-molecular-mass proteins (14.8, 14, 12.5, and 10 kDa) as components of the core SL RNP.     

The association of the U1-specific 70K and C proteins with U1 snRNPs is mediated in part by common U snRNP proteins.

The U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP)-specific 70K and A proteins are known to bind directly to stem-loops of the U1 snRNA, whereas the U1-C protein does not bind to naked U1 snRNA, but depends on other U1 snRNP protein components for its association. Focusing on the U1-70K and U1-C proteins, protein-protein interactions contributing to the association of these particle-specific proteins with the U1 snRNP were studied. Immunoprecipitation of complexes formed after incubation of naked U1 snRNA or purified U1 snRNPs lacking their specific proteins (core U1 snRNP) with in vitro translated U1-C protein, revealed that both common snRNP proteins and the U1-70K protein are required for the association of U1-C with the U1 snRNP. Binding studies with various in vitro translated U1-70K mutants demonstrated that the U1-70K N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for the interaction of U1-C with core U1 snRNPs. Surprisingly, several N-terminal fragments of the U1-70K protein, which lacked the U1-70K RNP-80 motif and did not bind naked U1 RNA, associated stably with core U1 snRNPs. This suggests that a new U1-70K binding site is generated upon association of common U1 snRNP proteins with U1 RNA. The interaction between the N-terminal domain of U1-70K and the core RNP domain was specific for the U1 snRNP; stable binding was not observed with core U2 or U5 snRNPs, suggesting essential structural differences among snRNP core domains. Evidence for direct protein-protein interactions between U1-specific proteins and common snRNP proteins was supported by chemical crosslinking experiments using purified U1 snRNPs. Individual crosslinks between the U1-70K and the common D2 or B'/B protein, as well as between U1-C and B'/B, were detected. A model for the assembly of U1 snRNP is presented in which the complex of common proteins on the RNA backbone functions as a platform for the association of the U1-specific proteins.     

Evidence for the existence of snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex and for their association by intermolecular base pairing

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) from eucaryotic cells can be fractionated on affinity columns prepared with antibodies of high affinity for 2,2,7-trimethyl-guanosine (m3G), which is present in the 5'-terminal caps of the snRNAs. While the snRNPs U1, U2 and U5 are eluted with the nucleoside m3G in the presence of 0.1 M salt, the snRNP species U4 and U6 are only desorbed when the salt concentration is increased. The same fractionation pattern was likewise observed for snRNPs from HeLa or Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Since U6 RNA lacks the m3G residue and its RNA does not react with anti-m3G, its co-chromatography with U4 RNP on anti-m3G affinity columns suggests either that discrete snRNPs U4 and U6 are intimately associated in nuclear extracts or that both RNAs are organized in one ribonucleoprotein particle. Further evidence for a U4/U6 RNP particle is obtained by sedimentation studies with purified snRNPs in sucrose gradients. Gel fractionation of RNAs shows identical distributions of snRNAs U4 and U6 in the gradient, and the U4/U6 RNP particle sediments faster than the snRNPs U1 or U2. Physical association between snRNPs U4 and U6 during sedimentation is shown by their co-precipitation with anti-m3G IgG from the gradient fractions. Finally, experimental evidence is provided that snRNAs U4 and U6 are associated by intermolecular base pairing in the U4/U6 RNP particle, as demonstrated by our finding that anti-m3G IgG co-precipitates U6 RNA with U4 RNA following phenolization of U4/U6 RNPs at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The differential interaction of snRNPs with pre-mRNA reveals splicing kinetics in living cells

Precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing is catalyzed by the spliceosome, a large ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex composed of five small nuclear RNP particles (snRNPs) and additional proteins. Using live cell imaging of GFP-tagged snRNP components expressed at endogenous levels, we examined how the spliceosome assembles in vivo. A comprehensive analysis of snRNP dynamics in the cell nucleus enabled us to determine snRNP diffusion throughout the nucleoplasm as well as the interaction rates of individual snRNPs with pre-mRNA. Core components of the spliceosome, U2 and U5 snRNPs, associated with pre-mRNA for 15-30 s, indicating that splicing is accomplished within this time period. Additionally, binding of U1 and U4/U6 snRNPs with pre-mRNA occurred within seconds, indicating that the interaction of individual snRNPs with pre-mRNA is distinct. These results are consistent with the predictions of the step-wise model of spliceosome assembly and provide an estimate on the rate of splicing in human cells.     

Functional organization of the Sm core in the crystal structure of human U1 snRNP

U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) recognizes the 5′‐splice site early during spliceosome assembly. It represents a prototype spliceosomal subunit containing a paradigmatic Sm core RNP. The crystal structure of human U1 snRNP obtained from natively purified material by in situ limited proteolysis at 4.4 Å resolution reveals how the seven Sm proteins, each recognize one nucleotide of the Sm site RNA using their Sm1 and Sm2 motifs. Proteins D1 and D2 guide the snRNA into and out of the Sm ring, and proteins F and E mediate a direct interaction between the Sm site termini. Terminal extensions of proteins D1, D2 and B/B′, and extended internal loops in D2 and B/B′ support a four‐way RNA junction and a 3′‐terminal stem‐loop on opposite sides of the Sm core RNP, respectively. On a higher organizational level, the core RNP presents multiple attachment sites for the U1‐specific 70K protein. The intricate, multi‐layered interplay of proteins and RNA rationalizes the hierarchical assembly of U snRNPs in vitro and in vivo.     

U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein: RNA structure analysis and ATP-dependent interaction with U4/U6.

To understand how the U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) interacts with other spliceosome components, its structure and binding to the U4/U6 snRNP were analyzed. The interaction of the U5 snRNP with the U4/U6 snRNP was studied by separating the snRNPs in HeLa cell nuclear extracts on glycerol gradients. A complex running at 25S and containing U4, U5, and U6 but not U1 or U2 snRNAs was identified. In contrast to results with native gel electrophoresis to separate snRNPs, this U4/U5/U6 snRNP complex requires ATP to assemble from the individual snRNPs. The structure of the U5 RNA within the U5 snRNP and the U4/5/6 snRNP complexes was then compared. Oligonucleotide-targeted RNase H digestion identified one RNA sequence in the U5 snRNP capable of base pairing to other nucleic acid sequences. Chemical modification experiments identified this sequence as well as two other U5 RNA sequences as accessible to modification within the U5 RNP. One of these regions is a large loop in the U5 RNA secondary structure whose sequence is conserved from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to humans. Interestingly, no differences in modification of free U5 snRNP as compared to U5 in the U4/U5/U6 snRNP complex were observed, suggesting that recognition of specific RNA sequences in the U5 snRNP is not required for U4/U5/U6 snRNP assembly.     

The structure of mammalian small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Identification of multiple protein components reactive with anti-(U1)ribonucleoprotein and anti-Sm autoantibodies

The Sm small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) from mammalian cells have been characterized as containing U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 RNA associated with some subset of at least 10 distinct polypeptides (called 68K, A, A', B, B', C, D, E, F, and G) that range in molecular weight from 68,000 to 11,000. Whereas this entire collection of snRNP particles is precipitated by patient anti-Sm autoantibodies, anti-(U1)RNP autoantibodies specifically recognize U1 snRNPs. Here, we have performed immunoblots using the sera from 29 patients and a mouse anti-Sm monoclonal antibody to identify which HeLa cell snRNP proteins carry anti-Sm or anti-(U1)RNP antigenic determinants. Strikingly, every serum surveyed, as well as the monoclonal antibody, recognizes determinants on two or more snRNP protein components. The three proteins, 68K, A, and C, that uniquely fractionate with U1 snRNPs are specifically reactive with anti-(U1)RNP sera in blots. Anti-Sm patient sera and the mouse monoclonal antibody react with proteins B, B', D, and sometimes E, one or more of which must be present on all Sm snRNPs. The blot results combined with data obtained from a refined 32P-labeled RNA immunoprecipitation assay reveal that, in our collection of the sera from 29 patients, anti-Sm rarely exists in the absence of equal or higher titers of anti-(U1)RNP; moreover, (U1)RNP sera often contain detectable levels of anti-Sm. Our findings further define the protein composition of the Sm snRNPs and raise intriguing questions concerning the relatedness of snRNP polypeptides and the mechanism of autoantibody induction.     

Autoantibodies to the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in a patient with scleroderma-polymyositis overlap syndrome

Autoantibodies directed against the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) have been found in the serum of a patient with scleroderma-polymyositis overlap syndrome. This specificity, called anti-(U2)-RNP, is distinct from all previously described autoantibodies, including those that precipitate related snRNPs: anti-Sm antibodies, which react with the entire set of U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs, and anti-(U1)RNP antibodies, which recognize only U1 snRNPs. From HeLa cell extracts, anti-(U2)RNP immunoprecipitates predominantly one 32P-labeled RNA species, identified as U2 small nuclear RNA, and six [35S]methionine-labeled protein bands, A' (Mr = 32,000), B (Mr = 28,000), D (Mr = 16,000), E (Mr = 13,000), F (Mr = 12,000), and G (Mr = 11,000). Protein blot analysis reveals that the A' protein carries (U2)RNP antigenic determinant(s) and therefore represents a polypeptide unique to the U2 snRNP; the B protein associated with U2 snRNPs may also be unique. Like U1 and the other Sm snRNPs, U2 snRNPs occupy a nuclear, non-nucleolar location and are antigenically conserved from insects to man. An antibody specific for the U2 snRNP will be useful in deciphering the function of this particle.     

Sequence-specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein complex functions in the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and prob ably other RNPs. All spliceosomal snRNPs have a common core of seven Sm proteins. To mediate the assembly of snRNPs, the SMN complex must be able to bring together Sm proteins with U snRNAs. We showed previously that SMN and other components of the SMN complex interact directly with several Sm proteins. Here, we show that the SMN complex also interacts specifically with U1 snRNA. The stem--loop 1 domain of U1 (SL1) is necessary and sufficient for SMN complex binding in vivo and in vitro. Substitution of three nucleotides in the SL1 loop (SL1A3) abolishes SMN interaction, and the corresponding U1 snRNA (U1A3) is impaired in U1 snRNP biogenesis. Microinjection of excess SL1 but not SL1A3 into Xenopus oocytes inhibits SMN complex binding to U1 snRNA and U1 snRNP assembly. These findings indicate that SMN complex interaction with SL1 is sequence-specific and critical for U1 snRNP biogenesis, further supporting the direct role of the SMN complex in RNP biogenesis.     

Localization and structure of snRNPs during mitosis. Immunofluorescent and biochemical studies

The distribution of U snRNAs during mitosis was studied by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with snRNA cap-specific anti-m3G antibodies. Whereas the snRNAs are strictly nuclear at late prophase, they become distributed in the cell plasm at metaphase and anaphase. They re-enter the newly formed nuclei of the two daughter cells at early telophase, producing speckled nuclear fluorescent patterns typical of interphase cells. While the snRNAs become concentrated at the rim of the condensing chromosomes and at interchromosomal regions at late prophase, essentially no association of the snRNAs was observed with the condensed chromosomes during metaphase and anaphase. Independent immunofluorescent studies with anti-(U1)RNP autoantibodies, which react specifically with proteins unique to the U1 snRNP species, showed the same distribution of snRNP antigens during mitosis as was observed with the snRNA-specific anti-m3G antibody. Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-(U1)RNP and anti-Sm autoantibodies, as well as protein analysis of snRNPs isolated from extracts of mitotic cells, demonstrate that the snRNAs remain associated in a specific manner with the same set of proteins during interphase and mitosis. The concept that the overall structure of the snRNPs is maintained during mitosis also applies to the coexistence of the snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex. Particle sedimentation studies in sucrose gradients reveal that most of the snRNPs present in sonicates of mitotic cells do not sediment as free RNP particles, but remain associated with high molecular weight (HMW) structures other than chromatin, most probably with hnRNA/RNP.     

A split luciferase-based reporter for detection of a cellular macromolecular complex

The spliceosome is a highly dynamic macromolecular ribonucleoprotein (RNP) machine that catalyzes pre-mRNA splicing by assembling U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs). To process large numbers of introns with a limited number of snRNPs, synthesis and recycling of snRNPs must be maintained within an appropriate range to avoid their shortage. However, the mechanism that maintains cellular snRNP levels is unknown. Molecules that modulate cellular snRNP levels may help to define this mechanism but are not available. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to develop a reporter for snRNP levels using split luciferase based on proteomic analysis of snRNPs. We constructed an expression library of a luciferase fragment fused to core components of U5 snRNP and used it to isolate pre-mRNA processing factor 6 (PRPF6) and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 40 kDa (U5-40K) that specifically reconstitute luciferase activity in the U5 snRNP complex. Here we show that this reporter detects the effects of small molecules on the levels of the U5 snRNP reporter protein complex. Our approach provides an alternative assay to discover small molecules targeting a macromolecular complex when the structure of the complex is not precisely identified.     

Interactions between small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles in formation of spliceosomes

Electrophoretic separation of ribonucleoprotein particles in a nondenaturing gel was used to analyze the splicing of mRNA precursors. Early in the reaction, a complex formed consisting of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) bound to sequences upstream of the 3' splice site. This complex is modeled as a precursor of a larger complex, the spliceosome, which contains U2, U4/6, and U5 snRNPs. Conversion of the U2 snRNP-precursor RNA complex to the spliceosome probably involves binding of a single multi-snRNP particle containing U4/6 and U5 snRNPs. The excised intron was released in a complex containing U5, U6, and probably U2 snRNPs. Surprisingly, U4 snRNP was not part of the intron-containing complex, suggesting that U4/6 snRNP disassembles and assembles during splicing. Subsequently, the reassembled U4/6 snRNP would associate with U5 snRNP and participate in de novo spliceosome formation. U1 snRNP was not detected in any of the splicing complexes.     

U1 small nuclear RNA variants differentially form ribonucleoprotein particles in vitro

The U1 small nuclear (sn)RNA participates in splicing of pre-mRNAs by recognizing and binding to 5′ splice sites at exon/intron boundaries. U1 snRNAs associate with 5′ splice sites in the form of ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) that are comprised of the U1 snRNA and 10 core components, including U1A, U1-70K, U1C and the ‘Smith antigen’, or Sm, heptamer. The U1 snRNA is highly conserved across a wide range of taxa; however, a number of reports have identified the presence of expressed U1-like snRNAs in multiple species, including humans. While numerous U1-like molecules have been shown to be expressed, it is unclear whether these variant snRNAs have the capacity to form snRNPs and participate in splicing. The purpose of the present study was to further characterize biochemically the ability of previously identified human U1-like variants to form snRNPs and bind to U1 snRNP proteins. A bioinformatics analysis provided support for the existence of multiple expressed variants. In vitro gel shift assays, competition assays, and immunoprecipitations (IPs) revealed that the variants formed high molecular weight assemblies to varying degrees and associated with core U1 snRNP proteins to a lesser extent than the canonical U1 snRNA. Together, these data suggest that the human U1 snRNA variants analyzed here are unable to efficiently bind U1 snRNP proteins. The current work provides additional biochemical insights into the ability of the variants to assemble into snRNPs.     

Fungal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins share properties with plant and vertebrate U-snRNPs.

snRNAs with properties closely related to those of the major vertebrate U-snRNAs are present in the fungi Aspergillus nidulans, Neurospora crassa and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. These RNAs possess a tri-methyl guanosine cap structure and a subset cross-hybridizes with human U1 and U2 clones. In the form of snRNPs, snRNAs from these fungi as well as from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and pea plants are immunoprecipitated by human and anti-Sm or anti-(U1)RNP autoimmune antibodies. On micro-injection into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes, the snRNAs are packaged into ribonucleoprotein particles and migrate into the nucleus. The results demonstrate a hitherto unsuspected degree of evolutionary conservation in snRNA structure, snRNP protein structure, and sites of RNA-protein interaction within snRNPs.     

A 69-kD protein that associates reversibly with the Sm core domain of several spliceosomal snRNP species

The biogenesis of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4, and U5 involves: (a) migration of the snRNA molecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; (b) assembly of a group of common proteins (Sm proteins) and their binding to a region on the snRNAs called the Sm-binding site; and (c) translocation of the RNP back to the nucleus. A first prerequisite for understanding the assembly pathway and nuclear transport of the snRNPs in more detail is the knowledge of all the snRNP proteins that play essential roles in these processes. We have recently observed a previously undetected 69- kD protein in 12S U1 snRNPs isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts under non-denaturing conditions that is clearly distinct from the U1-70K protein. The following evidence indicates that the 69-kD protein is a common, rather than a U1-specific, protein, possibly associating with the snRNP core particles by protein-protein interaction. (a) Antibodies raised against the 69-kD protein, which did not cross-react with any of the Sm proteins B'-G, precipitated not only U1 snRNPs, but also the other spliceosomal snRNPs U2, U4/U6 and U5, albeit to a lower extent. (b) U1, U2, and U5 core RNP particles reconstituted in vitro contain the 69-kD protein. (c) Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an immunologically related homologue of the human 69-kD protein. When U1 snRNA as well as a mutant U1 snRNA, that can bind the Sm core proteins but lacks the capacity to bind the U1-specific proteins 70K, A, and C, were injected into Xenopus oocytes to allow assembly in vivo, they were recognized by antibodies specific against the 69-kD protein in the ooplasm and in the nucleus. The 69-kD protein is under-represented, if present at all, in purified 17S U2 and in 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs, isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts. Our results are consistent with the working hypothesis that this protein may either play a role in the cytoplasmic assembly of the core domain of the snRNPs and/or in the nuclear transport of the snRNPs. After transport of the snRNPs into the nucleus, it may dissociate from the particles as for example in the case of the 17S U2 or the 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, which bind more than 10 different snRNP specific proteins each in the nucleus.     

The Cajal body: a meeting place for spliceosomal snRNPs in the nuclear maze

Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) are essential pre-mRNA splicing factors that consist of small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) complexed with specific sets of proteins. A considerable body of evidence has established that snRNP assembly is accomplished after snRNA synthesis in the nucleus through a series of steps involving cytoplasmic and nuclear phases. Recent work indicates that snRNPs transiently localize to the Cajal body (CB), a nonmembrane-bound inclusion present in the nuclei of most cells, for the final steps in snRNP maturation, including snRNA base modification, U4/U6 snRNA annealing, and snRNA-protein assembly. Here, we review these findings that suggest a crucial role for CBs in the spliceosome cycle in which production of new snRNPs—and perhaps regenerated snRNPs after splicing—is promoted by the concentration of substrates in this previously mysterious subnuclear organelle. These insights allow us to speculate on the role of nuclear bodies in regulating the dynamics of RNP assembly to maintain a functional pool of factors available for key steps in gene expression.