Nucleotide-dependent substrate recognition by the AAA+ HslUV protease

ATP-dependent protein degradation is controlled principally by substrate recognition. The AAA+ HslU ATPase is thought to bind protein substrates, denature them, and translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the HslV peptidase. The lack of well-behaved high-affinity substrates for HslUV (ClpYQ) has hampered understanding of the rules and mechanism of substrate engagement. We show that HslUV efficiently degrades Arc repressor, especially at heat-shock temperatures. Degradation depends on sequences near the N terminus of Arc. Fusion protein and peptide-binding experiments demonstrate that this sequence is a degradation tag that binds directly to HslU. Strong binding of this tag to the enzyme requires ATP and Mg(2+). Furthermore, fusion of this sequence to a protein with marked mechanical stability leads to complete degradation. Thus, these experiments demonstrate that HslUV is a powerful protein unfoldase and that initial substrate engagement by the HslU ATPase must occur after ATP binding.     

Asymmetric nucleotide transactions of the HslUV protease

ATP binding and hydrolysis are critical for protein degradation by HslUV, a AAA ⁺ machine containing one or two HslU₆ ATPases and the HslV₁₂ peptidase. Although each HslU homohexamer has six potential ATP-binding sites, we show that only three or four ATP molecules bind at saturation and present evidence for three functional subunit classes. These results imply that only a subset of HslU and HslUV crystal structures represents functional enzyme conformations. Our results support an asymmetric mechanism of ATP binding and hydrolysis, and suggest that molecular contacts between HslU and HslV vary dynamically throughout the ATPase cycle. Nucleotide binding controls HslUV assembly and activity. Binding of a single ATP allows HslU to bind HslV, whereas additional ATPs must bind HslU to support substrate recognition and to activate ATP hydrolysis, which powers substrate unfolding and translocation. Thus, a simple thermodynamic hierarchy ensures that substrates bind to functional HslUV complexes, that ATP hydrolysis is efficiently coupled to protein degradation, and that working HslUV does not dissociate, allowing highly processive degradation.     

Kinetics of protein substrate degradation by HslUV

The HslUV protease-chaperone complex degrades specific protein substrates in an ATP-dependent reaction. Current models propose that the HslU chaperone, a AAA protein of the Clp/Hsp100 family, binds and unfolds substrates and translocates the polypeptide into the catalytic cavity of the HslV protease. These processes are being characterized using substrates that are targeted to HslUV with a carboxy-terminal fusion of the natural substrate SulA or the carboxy-terminal 11 amino acid residues thereof. In a tandem fusion of green fluorescent protein with SulA, HslUV degrades the SulA moiety but not green fluorescent protein. Wild type and mutant Arc repressor variants are degraded; over a range of substrate stabilities, the specific rate of degradation and its dependence on substrate stability is similar to that of ClpXP. For a hyperstable Arc variant having an intermolecular disulfide bond, the rate of degradation by HslUV is an order of magnitude slower than by ClpXP. Similarity in degradation rates for a subset of substrates by HslUV and ClpXP suggests a similarity in mechanism of the apparent rate-limiting steps of unfolding and translocation by the chaperone components HslU and ClpX. The fall-off in degradation by HslUV for the more stable substrates that are degraded by ClpXP is consistent with the two systems acting on different spectra of biological substrates.     

The I domain of the AAA+ HslUV protease coordinates substrate binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein degradation

In the AAA+ HslUV protease, substrates are bound and unfolded by a ring hexamer of HslU, before translocation through an axial pore and into the HslV degradation chamber. Here, we show that the N-terminal residues of an Arc substrate initially bind in the HslU axial pore, with key contacts mediated by a pore loop that is highly conserved in all AAA+ unfoldases. Disordered loops from the six intermediate domains of the HslU hexamer project into a funnel-shaped cavity above the pore and are positioned to contact protein substrates. Mutations in these I-domain loops increase K(M) and decrease V(max) for degradation, increase the mobility of bound substrates, and prevent substrate stimulation of ATP hydrolysis. HslU-ΔI has negligible ATPase activity. Thus, the I domain plays an active role in coordinating substrate binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein degradation by the HslUV proteolytic machine.     

The C-terminal tails of HslU ATPase act as a molecular switch for activation of HslV peptidase

The bacterial HslVU ATP-dependent protease is a homolog of the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome. HslU ATPase forms a hexameric ring, and HslV peptidase is a dodecamer consisting of two stacked hexameric rings. In HslVU complex, the HslU and HslV central pores are aligned, and the proteolytic active sites are sequestered in an internal chamber of HslV, with access to this chamber restricted to small axial pores. Here we show that the C-terminal tails of HslU play a critical role in the interaction with and activation of HslV peptidase. A synthetic tail peptide of 10 amino acids could replace HslU in supporting the HslV-mediated hydrolysis of unfolded polypeptide substrates such as alpha-casein, as well as of small peptides, suggesting that the HslU C terminus is involved in the opening of the HslV pore for substrate entry. Moreover, deletion of 7 amino acids from the C terminus prevented the ability of HslU to form an HslVU complex with HslV. In addition, deletion of the C-terminal 10 residues prevented the formation of an HslU hexamer, indicating that the C terminus is required for HslU oligomerization. These results suggest that the HslU C-terminal tails act as a molecular switch for the assembly of HslVU complex and the activation of HslV peptidase.     

Crystal structure of HslUV complexed with a vinyl sulfone inhibitor: corroboration of a proposed mechanism of allosteric activation of HslV by HslU

On the basis of the structure of a HslUV complex, a mechanism of allosteric activation of the HslV protease, wherein binding of the HslU chaperone propagates a conformational change to the active site cleft of the protease, has been proposed. Here, the 3.1 A X-ray crystallographic structure of Haemophilus influenzae HslUV complexed with a vinyl sulfone inhibitor is described. The inhibitor, which reacts to form a covalent linkage to Thr1 of HslV, binds in an "antiparallel beta" manner, with hydrogen-bond interactions between the peptide backbone of the protease and that of the inhibitor, and with two leucinyl side chains of the inhibitor binding in the S1 and S3 specificity pockets of the protease. Comparison of the structure of the HslUV-inhibitor complex with that of HslV without inhibitor and in the absence of HslU reveals that backbone interactions would correctly position a substrate for cleavage in the HslUV complex, but not in the HslV protease alone, corroborating the proposed mechanism of allosteric activation. This activation mechanism differs from that of the eukaryotic proteasome, for which binding of activators opens a gated channel that controls access of substrates to the protease, but does not perturb the active site environment.     

Crystal and solution structures of an HslUV protease-chaperone complex

HslUV is a "prokaryotic proteasome" composed of the HslV protease and the HslU ATPase, a chaperone of the Clp/Hsp100 family. The 3.4 A crystal structure of an HslUV complex is presented here. Two hexameric ATP binding rings of HslU bind intimately to opposite sides of the HslV protease; the HslU "intermediate domains" extend outward from the complex. The solution structure of HslUV, derived from small angle X-ray scattering data under conditions where the complex is assembled and active, agrees with this crystallographic structure. When the complex forms, the carboxy-terminal helices of HslU distend and bind between subunits of HslV, and the apical helices of HslV shift substantially, transmitting a conformational change to the active site region of the protease.     

Stepwise activity of ClpY (HslU) mutants in the processive degradation of Escherichia coli ClpYQ (HslUV) protease substrates

In Escherichia coli, ClpYQ (HslUV) is a two-component ATP-dependent protease composed of ClpY (HslU), an ATPase with unfolding activity, and ClpQ (HslV), a peptidase. In the ClpYQ proteolytic complex, the hexameric rings of ClpY (HslU) are responsible for protein recognition, unfolding, and translocation into the proteolytic inner chamber of the dodecameric ClpQ (HslV). Each of the three domains, N, I, and C, in ClpY has its own distinct activity. The double loops (amino acids [aa] 137 to 150 and 175 to 209) in domain I of ClpY are necessary for initial recognition/tethering of natural substrates such as SulA, a cell division inhibitor protein. The highly conserved sequence GYVG (aa 90 to 93) pore I site, along with the GESSG pore II site (aa 265 to 269), contribute to the central pore of ClpY in domain N. These two central loops of ClpY are in the center of its hexameric ring in which the energy of ATP hydrolysis allows substrate translocation and then degradation by ClpQ. However, no data have been obtained to determine the effect of the central loops on substrate binding or as part of the processivity of the ClpYQ complex. Thus, we probed the features of ClpY important for substrate engagement and protease processivity via random PCR or site-specific mutagenesis. In yeast two-hybrid analysis and pulldown assays, using isolated ClpY mutants and the pore I or pore II site of ClpY, each was examined for its influence on the adjoining structural regions of the substrates. The pore I site is essential for the translocation of the engaged substrates. Our in vivo study of the ClpY mutants also revealed that an ATP-binding site in domain N, separate from its role in polypeptide (ClpY) oligomerization, is required for complex formation with ClpQ. Additionally, we found that the tyrosine residue at position 408 in ClpY is critical for stabilization of hexamer formation between subunits. Therefore, our studies suggest that stepwise activities of the ClpYQ protease are necessary to facilitate the processive degradation of its natural substrates.     

Insights into the Molecular Evolution of HslU ATPase through Biochemical and Mutational Analyses

The ATP-dependent HslVU complexes are found in all three biological kingdoms. A single HslV protease exists in each species of prokaryotes, archaea, and eukaryotes, but two HslUs (HslU1 and HslU2) are present in the mitochondria of eukaryotes. Previously, a tyrosine residue at the C-terminal tail of HslU2 has been identified as a key determinant of HslV activation in Trypanosoma brucei and a phenylalanine at the equivalent position to E. coli HslU is found in T. brucei HslU1. Unexpectedly, we found that an F441Y mutation in HslU enhanced the peptidase and caseinolytic activity of HslV in E. coli but it showed partially reduced ATPase and SulA degradation activity. Previously, only the C-terminal tail of HslU has been the focus of HslV activation studies. However, the Pro315 residue interacting with Phe441 in free HslU has also been found to be critical for HslV activation. Hence, our current biochemical analyses explore the importance of the loop region just before Pro315 for HslVU complex functionality. The proline and phenylalanine pair in prokaryotic HslU was replaced with the threonine and tyrosine pair from the functional eukaryotic HslU2. Sequence comparisons between multiple HslUs from three different biological kingdoms in combination with biochemical analysis of E. coli mutants have uncovered important new insights into the molecular evolutionary pathway of HslU.     

Location of Dual Sites in E. coli FtsZ Important for Degradation by ClpXP; One at the C-Terminus and One in the Disordered Linker

ClpXP is a two-component ATP-dependent protease that unfolds and degrades proteins bearing specific recognition signals. One substrate degraded by Escherichia coli ClpXP is FtsZ, an essential cell division protein. FtsZ forms polymers that assemble into a large ring-like structure, termed the Z-ring, during cell division at the site of constriction. The FtsZ monomer is composed of an N-terminal polymerization domain, an unstructured linker region and a C-terminal conserved region. To better understand substrate selection by ClpXP, we engineered FtsZ mutant proteins containing amino acid substitutions or deletions near the FtsZ C-terminus. We identified two discrete regions of FtsZ important for degradation of both FtsZ monomers and polymers by ClpXP in vitro. One region is located 30 residues away from the C-terminus in the unstructured linker region that connects the polymerization domain to the C-terminal region. The other region is near the FtsZ C-terminus and partially overlaps the recognition sites for several other FtsZ-interacting proteins, including MinC, ZipA and FtsA. Mutation of either region caused the protein to be more stable and mutation of both caused an additive effect, suggesting that both regions are important. We also observed that in vitro MinC inhibits degradation of FtsZ by ClpXP, suggesting that some of the same residues in the C-terminal site that are important for degradation by ClpXP are important for binding MinC.     

Structure and reactivity of an asymmetric complex between HslV and I-domain deleted HslU,a prokaryotic homolog of the eukaryotic proteasome

In the prokaryotic homolog of the eukaryotic proteasome, HslUV, the "double donut" HslV protease is allosterically activated by HslU, an AAA protein of the Clp/Hsp100 family consisting of three (amino-terminal, carboxy-terminal, and intermediate) domains. The intermediate domains of HslU, which extend like tentacles from the hexameric ring formed by the amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal domains, have been deleted; an asymmetric HslU(DeltaI)(6)HslV(12) complex has been crystallized; and the structure has been solved to 2.5A resolution, revealing an assembly in which a HslU(DeltaI) hexamer binds one end of the HslV dodecamer. The conformation of the protomers of the HslU(DeltaI)-complexed HslV hexamer is similar to that in the symmetric wild-type HslUV complex, while the protomer conformation of the uncomplexed HslV hexamer is similar to that of HslV alone. Reaction in the crystals with a vinyl sulfone inhibitor reveals that the HslU(DeltaI)-complexed HslV hexamer is active, while the uncomplexed HslV hexamer is inactive. These results confirm that HslV can be activated by binding of a hexameric HslU(DeltaI)(6) ring lacking the I domains, that activation is effected through a conformational change in HslV rather than through alteration of the size of the entry channel into the protease catalytic cavity, and that the two HslV(6) rings in the protease dodecamer are activated independently rather than cooperatively.     

ATP-dependent Proteases Differ Substantially in Their Ability to Unfold Globular Proteins

ATP-dependent proteases control the concentrations of hundreds of regulatory proteins and remove damaged or misfolded proteins from cells. They select their substrates primarily by recognizing sequence motifs or covalent modifications. Once a substrate is bound to the protease, it has to be unfolded and translocated into the proteolytic chamber to be degraded. Some proteases appear to be promiscuous, degrading substrates with poorly defined targeting signals, which suggests that selectivity may be controlled at additional levels. Here we compare the abilities of representatives from all classes of ATP-dependent proteases to unfold a model substrate protein and find that the unfolding abilities range over more than 2 orders of magnitude. We propose that these differences in unfolding abilities contribute to the fates of substrate proteins and may act as a further layer of selectivity during protein destruction.Energy-dependent proteolysis is responsible for more than 90% of the protein turnover inside the cell (1). This process both removes misfolded and aggregated proteins as part of the response of the cell to stress and controls the concentrations of regulatory proteins (2, 3). In prokaryotes and eukaryotic organelles, energy-dependent proteases fall into five classes as follows: ClpAP, ClpXP, Lon, HslUV (also referred to as ClpYQ), and HflB (also referred to as FtsH). In Archaea, analogous functions are performed by the archaebacterial proteasome, consisting of the proteasome-activating nucleotidase (PAN),³ working with the 20 S proteasome (4); in the cytoplasm and nucleus of eukaryotes, these same functions are performed by the 26 S proteasome (5). These different proteases show little sequence conservation outside the ATP-binding domains, but they share their overall architecture. They all form oligomeric, barrel-shaped complexes composed of one or more rings with the active sites of proteolysis sequestered inside a central degradation chamber (6). Access channels to these sites are narrow, and proteins have to be unfolded to gain entry (6). Regulatory particles belonging to the AAA family of molecular chaperones assemble on either end of the proteolytic chamber and recognize substrates destined for degradation. After recognition, the regulatory particles translocate the substrate through a central channel to the proteolytic chamber and in doing so unravel folded domains within the substrate. Translocation and unfolding are driven by ATP hydrolysis by the regulatory particles, with conformational changes in the protease transmitted to the substrate by conserved residues in the loops lining the channel (7–10).Protein degradation by AAA proteases is tightly regulated. Most proteins are targeted to ClpAP, ClpXP, HslUV, Lon, HflB, and PAN by sequence motifs in their primary structure (11–17). Sometimes adaptor proteins recognize and bind sequence elements in substrates and deliver them to the protease, and other times the protease recognizes sequence elements directly (18, 19). In contrast, proteins are typically targeted to the 26 S proteasome through the covalent attachment of polyubiquitin chains (20). Thus, substrates appear to be selected for degradation based on the presence of specific recognition elements in the protein substrates.However, other mechanisms may also affect the specificity of degradation by prokaryotic proteases. Individual proteases recognize a wide range of targeting signals (11, 16). (For example, Escherichia coli ClpXP recognizes sequences belonging to five distinct classes of consensus sequences (11), and ClpAP, Lon, and FtsH can bind to unstructured regions in proteins with a wide range of amino acid sequences (21–23).) One illustration of the loose specificity in targeting signals is the ability of a mitochondrial presequence to target proteins to the proteases ClpAP (24) and HslUV in vitro (see below). In addition, substrates are commonly acted upon by several different proteases in E. coli. For instance, proteins containing the 11-residue ssrA peptide at their C termini can be recognized by ClpAP, ClpXP, FtsH, Lon, and the archaebacterial proteasome (4, 25–27). Similarly, some substrates of Lon can be degraded by HslUV in vivo (28).It is not clear how degradation remains selective despite the loose specificity of targeting signals. We propose that the intrinsic protein unfolding ability of AAA proteases and the stabilities of substrates against unfolding play a role in determining the fate of cellular proteins. For example, ClpXP releases hard-to-unfold substrates when it encounters them and degrades destabilized titin variants 20-fold faster than wild type titin (29). The membrane-bound AAA protease FtsH has a weak unfolding ability, which allows this protease to act selectively on damaged and unfolded polypeptides (30). Here we find that the relative unfolding abilities of ATP-dependent proteases vary more than 100-fold and that the unfolding abilities of proteases belonging to the same class but originating from different species appear to be conserved. The unfolding abilities also seem to be intrinsic properties of the proteases themselves rather than other cytosolic factors, such as chaperones. Differences in protease unfolding abilities may contribute to substrate selectivity during protein degradation. For example, expression of a protease with a weak unfolding ability during a stress response could allow the selective elimination of unfolded, misfolded, or otherwise aberrant proteins and spare stable proteins from destruction (30).     

Proteasomes begin ornithine decarboxylase digestion at the C terminus

Proteasomes denature folded protein substrates and thread them through a narrow pore that leads to the sequestered sites of proteolysis. Whether a protein substrate initiates insertion from its N or C terminus or in a random orientation has not been determined for any natural substrate. We used the labile enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which is recognized by the proteasome via a 37-residue C-terminal tag, to answer this question. Three independent approaches were used to assess orientation as follows. 1) The 461-residue ODC protein chain was interrupted at position 305. The C-terminal fragment was degraded by purified proteasomes, but because processivity requires continuity of the polypeptide chain, the N-terminal fragment was spared. 2) A proteasome-inhibitory viral sequence prevented degradation when introduced near the C terminus but not when inserted elsewhere in ODC. 3) A bulky tightly folded protein obstructed in vivo degradation most effectively when positioned near the C terminus. These data demonstrate that the proteasome initiates degradation of this native substrate at the C terminus. The co-localization of entry site and degradation tag to the ODC C terminus suggests that recognition tags determine the site for initiating entry. Flexibility of a polypeptide terminus may promote the initiation of degradation.     

Role of the GYVG pore motif of HslU ATPase in protein unfolding and translocation for degradation by HslV peptidase

HslVU is an ATP-dependent protease consisting of HslU ATPase and HslV peptidase. In an HslVU complex, the central pores of HslU hexamer and HslV dodecamer are aligned and the proteolytic active sites are sequestered in the inner chamber of HslV. Thus, the degradation of natively folded proteins requires unfolding and translocation processes for their access into the proteolytic chamber of HslV. A highly conserved GYVG(93) sequence constitutes the central pore of HslU ATPase. To determine the role of the pore motif on protein unfolding and translocation, we generated various mutations in the motif and examined their effects on the ability of HslU in supporting the proteolytic activity of HslV against three different substrates: SulA as a natively folded protein, casein as an unfolded polypeptide, and a small peptide. Flexibility provided by Gly residues and aromatic ring structures of the 91st amino acid were essential for degradation of SulA. The same structural features of the GYVG motif were highly preferred, although not essential, for degradation of casein. In contrast, none of the features were required for peptide hydrolysis. Mutations in the GYVG motif of HslU also showed marked influence on its ATPase activity, affinity to ADP, and interaction with HslV. These results suggest that the GYVG motif of HslU plays important roles in unfolding of natively folded proteins as well as in translocation of unfolded proteins for degradation by HslV. These results also implicate a role of the pore motif in ATP cleavage and in the assembly of HslVU complex.     

Bacteriophage Mu repressor as a target for the Escherichia coli ATP-dependent Clp Protease.

Bacteriophage Mu repressor, which is stable in its wildtype form, can mutate to become sensitive to its Escherichia coli host ATP-dependent ClpXP protease. We further investigated the determinants of the mutant repressor's sensitivity to Clp. We show the crucial importance of a C-terminal, seven amino acid long sequence in which a single change is sufficient to decrease the rate of degradation of the protein. The sequence was fused at the C-terminal end of the CcdB and CcdA proteins encoded by plasmid F. CcdB, which is naturally stable, was unaffected, while CcdA, which is normally degraded by the Lon protease, became a substrate for ClpXP while remaining a substrate for Lon. In agreement with the current hypothesis on the mechanism of recognition of their substrates by energy- dependent proteases, these results support the existence, on the substrate polypeptides, of separate motifs responsible for recognition and cleavage by the protease.     

Targeted delivery of an ssrA-tagged substrate by the adaptor protein SspB to its cognate AAA+ protein ClpX

In the bacterial cytosol, degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins is primarily carried out by the proteolytic machine ClpXP in a process which is stimulated by a ClpX-specific adaptor protein, SspB. Here we elucidate the steps required for binding and transfer of ssrA-tagged substrates from SspB to ClpX. The N-terminal region of SspB is essential for its interaction with ssrA-tagged substrates, while a short conserved region at the C terminus of SspB interacts specifically with the N domain of ClpX. A single point mutation within the conserved C-terminal region of SspB is sufficient to abolish the SspB-mediated degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins by ClpXP. We propose that this region represents a common motif for the recognition of ClpX as the C-terminal region of SspB shares considerable homology with the other ClpX-specific adaptor protein, RssB. Through docking of SspB to the N-terminal domain of ClpX, the substrate is delivered to the substrate binding site in ClpX.     

Altered specificity of a AAA+ protease

ClpXP, an ATP-dependent protease, degrades hundreds of different intracellular proteins. ClpX chooses substrates by binding peptide tags, typically displayed at the N or C terminus of the protein to be degraded. Here, we identify a ClpX mutant that displays a 300-fold change in substrate specificity, resulting in decreased degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates but improved degradation of proteins with other classes of degradation signals. The altered-specificity mutation occurs within "RKH" loops, which surround the entrance to the central pore of the ClpX hexamer and are highly conserved in the ClpX subfamily of AAA+ ATPases. These results support a major role for the RKH loops in substrate recognition and suggest that ClpX specificity represents an evolutionary compromise that has optimized degradation of multiple types of substrates rather than any single class.     

The C terminus of sigma(32) is not essential for degradation by FtsH

A key step in the regulation of heat shock genes in Escherichia coli is the stress-dependent degradation of the heat shock promoter-specific sigma(32) subunit of RNA polymerase by the AAA protease, FtsH. Previous studies implicated the C termini of protein substrates, including sigma(32), as degradation signals for AAA proteases. We investigated the role of the C terminus of sigma(32) in FtsH-dependent degradation by analysis of C-terminally truncated sigma(32) mutant proteins. Deletion of the 5, 11, 15, and 21 C-terminal residues of sigma(32) did not affect degradation in vivo or in vitro. Furthermore, a peptide comprising the C-terminal 21 residues of sigma(32) was not degraded by FtsH in vitro and thus did not serve as a recognition sequence for the protease, while an unrelated peptide of similar length was efficiently degraded. The truncated sigma(32) mutant proteins remained capable of associating with DnaK and DnaJ in vitro but showed intermediate (5-amino-acid deletion) and strong (11-, 15-, and 21-amino-acid deletions) defects in association with RNA polymerase in vitro and biological activity in vivo. These results indicate an important role for the C terminus of sigma(32) in RNA polymerase binding but no essential role for FtsH-dependent degradation and association of chaperones.