Organization of F-Actin via Concerted Regulation of Kette by PTP61F and dAbl

We identify Kette, a key regulator of actin polymerization, as a substrate for Drosophila protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP61F, as well as for dAbl tyrosine kinase. We further show that dAbl is a direct substrate for PTP61F. Therefore, Kette phosphotyrosine levels are regulated both directly and indirectly by PTP61F. Kette and PTP61F genetically interact in the regulation of F-actin organization in pupal eye discs, suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation is essential for the proper regulation of Kette-mediated actin dynamics. This hypothesis was confirmed by demonstrating the loss of Kette-mediated F-actin organization and lamella formation in S2 cells in a Kette Y482F mutant in which the dAbl phosphorylation site was eliminated. Our results establish for the first time that PTP61F and dAbl ensure proper actin organization through the coordinated and reversible tyrosine phosphorylation of Kette.The actin cytoskeleton is regulated as a function of development, cell motility, intracellular transport, and the cell cycle by the polymerization of G-actin to F-actin (34). Correct regulation of actin cytoskeletal dynamics is essential to numerous differentiating and cellular processes in the nervous system (9) and musculature (42), among others. Actin polymerization is regulated by a number of proteins, among which is human NCK-associated protein 1 (NAP-1 [3, 4, 45]). It and its Drosophila orthologue, Kette (Hem in FlyBase), are critical components in both SCAR/WAVE and WASP complexes, which play essential roles in transducing Rac1 signals to initiate Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization (6, 25, 40, 48). Murine NAP-1 interacts with NCK, an SH2-SH3 adaptor protein (4), and is essential for proper neuronal differentiation in the cortex (53). Neuronal differentiation and neural tube defects are observed in NAP-1 mutant mice, apparently due to reduced localization of WAVE1 to the cell membrane (53).In Drosophila, loss of kette activity specifically results in the accumulation of cytosolic F-actin (6). Kette protein associates with F-actin in the cytosol, but also at focal contact sites, where it apparently antagonizes SCAR/WAVE function and activates WASP-dependent actin polymerization (6). Despite its role in repressing SCAR/WAVE function, Kette serves to protect the complex from proteosome-mediated degradation and is critical to its intracellular localization (25). At the level of the organism, kette alleles affect axonal growth and pathfinding due to aberrant actin cytoskeleton formation, for example, altering crossing of the embryonic ventral midline by VUM neuron axons, as well as generating aberrant axonal projections in both motor and sensory neurons (21). Like mammalian NAP-1, Drosophila kette also interacts with the fly NCK orthologue, dreadlocks (dock) (21). Other evidence for the conserved interaction of Kette with signaling cascades is provided by the observation that kette mutant phenotypes are partially rescuable by overexpression of the small G protein Rac1 (21). The interaction of kette with dock suggests the possibility of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of Kette activity, but no evidence supporting this hypothesis has been reported.Signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in various metazoans controls numerous processes involved in cellular differentiation and proliferation. Many of the components regulating tyrosine phosphorylation have been identified and characterized using genetic, biochemical, molecular, and genomic sequence analyses (31). However, in contrast to the very well-characterized regulation of cellular processes by kinase-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation (15, 52), their regulation by dephosphorylation by protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) has generally lagged behind. Although the functions of several receptor PTPs have been clearly defined as playing essential roles in axon guidance in both Drosophila (12, 23, 41, 47, 50) and mammals (44, 49), our understanding of nontransmembrane PTPs (NT-PTPs) is more limited. Only three of the eight putative Drosophila NT-PTPs have been characterized genetically. Corkscrew (Csw) acts as a downstream effector of various receptor protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and is essential for R7 photoreceptor development (35). PTP-enhancer of Ras1 has been characterized as an essential regulator antagonizing signaling mediated by Ras1, possibly through tyrosine dephosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (24, 36). More recently, it has been shown that PTP-meg participates in the establishment and maintenance of axon projections in the Drosophila brain (51). Other than these, the functions of Drosophila NT-PTPs remain largely unknown.PTP61F was originally identified as an NT-PTP that contains one phosphatase domain in the N-terminal region and five proline-rich motifs in the C-terminal tail (29). It is the Drosophila orthologue of mammalian PTP1B and T-cell PTP (TC-PTP) (1), which have been implicated in the regulation of signaling by both insulin (39) and JAK/STAT (33). Two PTP61F isoforms due to alternative splicing possess unique sequences at the C terminus, which determine either internal membrane-association (PTP61Fm) or nuclear localization (PTP61Fn) (29). To date, limited data suggest that PTP61F may participate in the downregulation of JAK/STAT signaling (2, 32), although the underlying mechanism remains unexplored. While PTP61F may recognize the adaptor proteins DOCK (10) and Abi (20) as potential substrates, the signaling pathways involving these interactions have not been clearly defined. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that the regulation of Kette, and hence the localization and polymerization of the actin cytoskeleton, is achieved by reversible tyrosine phosphorylation under the control of both PTP61F and the PTK dAbl.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Recruitment of Cdc20 to the Kinetochore Requires BubR1 but Not Mad2 in Drosophila melanogaster

To prevent aneuploidy, cells require a mitotic surveillance mechanism, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). The SAC prevents metaphase/anaphase transition by blocking the ubiquitylation and destruction of cyclin B and securin via the Cdc20-activated anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated proteolysis pathway. This checkpoint involves the kinetochore proteins Mad2, BubR1, and Cdc20. Mad2 and BubR1 are inhibitors of the APC/C, but Cdc20 is an activator. Exactly how the SAC regulates Cdc20 via unattached kinetochores remains unclear; in vertebrates, most current models suggest that kinetochore-bound Mad2 is required for initial binding to Cdc20 to form a stable complex that includes BubR1. Here, we show that the Mad2 kinetochore dimerization recruitment mechanism is conserved and that the recruitment of Cdc20 to kinetochores in Drosophila requires BubR1 but not Mad2. BubR1 and Mad2 can bind to Cdc20 independently, and the interactions are enhanced after cells are arrested at mitosis by the depletion of Cdc27 using RNA interference (RNAi) in S2 cells or by MG132 treatment in syncytial embryos. These findings offer an explanation of why BubR1 is more important than Mad2 for SAC function in flies. These findings could lead to a better understanding of vertebrate SAC mechanisms.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a mitotic surveillance mechanism that negatively regulates the activation of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated proteolysis pathway to prevent the destruction of two key substrates, cyclin B and securin, thereby inhibiting the metaphase-to-anaphase transition until bipolar attachment of all chromosomes has been achieved (35). A number of conserved kinetochore proteins have been identified as SAC components, such as Mad1, Mad2, Bub1, BubR1, Bub3, Mps1, Zw10, and Rod and Aurora B kinase (reviewed by Musacchio and Salmon [35]). In vertebrates, it is believed that a diffusible inhibitory “wait anaphase” signal is generated from unattached kinetochores or lack of spindle tension (27, 45, 47) and that its primary target is Cdc20/Fzy (Fzy is the Drosophila Cdc20 homolog that we refer to as Cdc20 here), which is an essential APC/C activator (35). Mad2, BubR1 (Mad3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Bub3, and Cdc20 have been found in the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) or its subcomplexes Bub3-BubR1-Cdc20 and Mad2-Cdc20 (42, 50, 56). Kinetochore-dependent recruitment and activation of Mad2 have been illustrated in a “template” model (12) and later a modified “two-state” model (28, 32, 35, 36, 40, 57). This model suggests that a kinetochore-bound and conformationally rearranged Mad2 is required for Cdc20 binding and that it leads to the formation of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex (8, 9, 12, 16, 48, 49). This is further supported by a more recent report that unattached kinetochores from purified HeLa cell chromosomes can catalytically generate a diffusible Cdc20 inhibitor when presented with kinetochore-bound Mad2 and that these purified chromosomes can also promote BubR1 binding to APC/C-Cdc20 by acting directly on Mad2 but not BubR1 (27). In vitro assays also suggest that Mad2 is required for Cdc20 binding to BubR1 (7, 10, 19). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis has suggested that the ∼50% of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Cdc20 that associates with slow-phase kinetics on PtK₂ cell kinetochores is Mad2 dependent (22). However, contradictory reports also exist to suggest that Mad2 might not be required for Cdc20 kinetochore localization in Xenopus and PtK₂ cells (22) and that BubR1 might play a crucial role for this in human cell lines (33). In contrast to the above-mentioned slow-phase GFP-Cdc20, the remaining ∼50% of GFP-Cdc20 that associates with fast kinetics on prometaphase or metaphase kinetochores is Mad2 independent, and its kinetics parallel those of GFP-BubR1 in PtK₂ cells. GFP-Cdc20 is still detectable on kinetochores through anaphase, where both Mad2 and BubR1 are greatly reduced (22, 25). Moreover, the direct requirement for the kinetochore in the formation of the SAC-inhibitory complexes has been challenged by a non-kinetochore-based formation hypothesis, with MCC found to be present in HeLa cells during S phase (50) and complex formation in yeast previously shown to be independent of intact kinetochores (17, 43). Therefore, despite the importance of Cdc20 in understanding SAC mechanisms, exactly how the SAC regulates Cdc20 via unattached kinetochores remains unclear in vertebrates.Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model used to study the spindle assembly checkpoint (2, 3, 6, 39). More recently, phenotypes of two mad2-null Drosophila mutant alleles, mad2^Δ and mad2^P, have been characterized, showing that Mad2 protein is not essential for normal mitotic progression but remains essential for SAC when microtubule attachment, chromosome alignment, and congression are abnormal (5). This contrasts with its counterpart in mouse and human (14, 34, 54) and is also different from the lethality phenotypes reported for bubR1 and cdc20 mutations in Drosophila (3, 11). It has also been reported that Mad2 is less important for SAC than BubR1 and that it is regulated differently in Drosophila S2 culture cells (39). These observations led to the tentative conclusion that Drosophila Mad2 may possess different kinetochore molecular mechanisms and function differently from its homologs in mouse and human (14, 34, 54, 58). We therefore tested Mad2 kinetochore function and further investigated the mechanisms required for Cdc20 kinetochore recruitment and localization using Drosophila transgenic and mutant lines, as well as culture cells. We have characterized a new mad2-null mutant allele, mad2^EY, and demonstrated that Drosophila possesses a highly conserved Mad2 kinetochore dimerization mechanism required for SAC function. However, Mad2 is not required for Cdc20 kinetochore recruitment and localization. Instead, there is an essential role for BubR1 in this mechanism during normal mitosis and SAC activation.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Development and Application of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for the Specific Detection of Cronobacter Genomospecies (Enterobacter sakazakii) in Powdered Infant Formula

Here, we report a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method for rapid detection of Cronobacter strains in powdered infant formula (PIF) using a novel peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe. Laboratory tests with several Enterobacteriaceae species showed that the specificity and sensitivity of the method were 100%. FISH using PNA could detect as few as 1 CFU per 10 g of Cronobacter in PIF after an 8-h enrichment step, even in a mixed population containing bacterial contaminants.Cronobacter strains were originally described as Enterobacter sakazakii (12), but they are now known to comprise a novel genus consisting of six separate genomospecies (20, 21). These opportunistic pathogens are ubiquitous in the environment and various types of food and are occasionally found in the normal human flora (11, 12, 16, 32, 47). Based on case reports, Cronobacter infections in adults are generally less severe than Cronobacter infections in newborn infants, with which a high fatality rate is associated (24).The ability to detect Cronobacter and trace possible sources of infection is essential as a means of limiting the impact of these organisms on neonatal health and maintaining consumer confidence in powdered infant formula (PIF). Conventional methods, involving isolation of individual colonies followed by biochemical identification, are more time-consuming than molecular methods, and the reliability of some currently proposed culture-based methods has been questioned (28). Recently, several PCR-based techniques have been described (23, 26, 28-31, 38). These techniques are reported to be efficient even when low levels of Cronobacter cells are found in a sample (0.36 to 66 CFU/100 g). However, PCR requires DNA extraction and does not allow direct, in situ visualization of the bacterium in a sample.Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a method that is commonly used for bacterial identification and localization in samples. This method is based on specific binding of nucleic acid probes to particular DNA or RNA target regions (1, 2). rRNA has been regarded as the most suitable target for bacterial FISH, allowing differentiation of potentially viable cells. Traditionally, FISH methods are based on the use of conventional DNA oligonucleotide probes, and a commercial system, VIT-E sakazakii (Vermicon A.G., Munich, Germany), has been developed based on this technology (25). However, a recently developed synthetic DNA analogue, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), has been shown to provide improved hybridization performance compared to DNA probes, making FISH procedures easier and more efficient (41). Taking advantage of the PNA properties, FISH using PNA has been successfully used for detection of several clinically relevant microorganisms (5, 15, 17, 27, 34-36).     

A Role for p38 Stress-Activated Protein Kinase in Regulation of Cell Growth via TORC1

The target of rapamycin (TOR) complex 1 (TORC1) signaling pathway is a critical regulator of translation and cell growth. To identify novel components of this pathway, we performed a kinome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screen in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. RNAi targeting components of the p38 stress-activated kinase cascade prevented the cell size increase elicited by depletion of the TOR negative regulator TSC2. In mammalian and Drosophila tissue culture, as well as in Drosophila ovaries ex vivo, p38-activating stresses, such as H₂O₂ and anisomycin, were able to activate TORC1. This stress-induced TORC1 activation could be blocked by RNAi against mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 and 6 (MKK3/6) or by the overexpression of dominant negative Rags. Interestingly, p38 was also required for the activation of TORC1 in response to amino acids and growth factors. Genetic ablation either of p38b or licorne, its upstream kinase, resulted in small flies consisting of small cells. Mutants with mutations in licorne or p38b are nutrition sensitive; low-nutrient food accentuates the small-organism phenotypes, as well as the partial lethality of the p38b null allele. These data suggest that p38 is an important positive regulator of TORC1 in both mammalian and Drosophila systems in response to certain stresses and growth factors.The target of rapamycin, TOR, is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that is a critical regulator of cell growth. It is a core component of two signaling complexes, TORC1 and TORC2 (60, 74). TORC1 is defined by the presence of Raptor in the complex, while TORC2 contains Rictor. Rictor and Raptor are mutually exclusive. Activation of the TORC1 pathway leads to increased protein translation, increased cell size, and increased proliferation, making this pathway an important target for emerging cancer therapies. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of TORC1 that is commonly used as an immunosuppressant following kidney transplantation (51). At least three analogs of rapamycin are currently being tested in solid and hematological tumors and have shown some promising results (21).The TORC1 pathway responds to numerous inputs, sensing both the desirability of and the capacity for growth. Many of these pathways control TORC1 signaling through phosphorylation of the tuberous sclerosis protein TSC2. TSC2 associates with TSC1 to form a heterodimeric GTPase-activating protein complex (GAP) that inactivates the small GTPase Rheb (24, 29, 67). While the exact molecular mechanism remains a topic of debate, activation of Rheb promotes the kinase activity of TORC1 (24, 29, 67). Rheb is required for the activation of TORC1 in response to both amino acids and growth factors (55, 62). In Drosophila melanogaster, mutation of either TOR or Rheb inhibits growth, leading to reduced body size and reduced cell size in mutant clones (42, 64). Mutation of either TSC1 or TSC2 has the predicted opposite effect, as tissue deficient for either of these proteins overgrows and contains large cells (49, 66).TORC1 is activated via the phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase (PI3′K) pathway by growth-promoting mitogens, such as insulin and growth factors. Drosophila mutants with mutations of PI3′K pathway components have size phenotypes similar to those of the TOR and Rheb mutants (71). In mammalian cells, the PI3′K-mediated activation of TORC1 occurs at least in part through the phosphorylation of TSC2 by the PI3′K target AKT (30, 50). Interestingly, mutation of these residues in Drosophila has no impact on TSC2 function in vivo, suggesting that there may be other mechanisms through which PI3′K can activate Drosophila TOR (20). Recent work has suggested that the proline-rich AKT substrate PRAS40 may provide part of this link (23, 59, 69, 70). In addition, signaling through RAS activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), which can phosphorylate TSC2 and Raptor to activate TORC1 (13, 40, 56). There are also likely to be additional mechanisms through which growth factors activate Drosophila TOR that have not yet been identified.TORC1 activity is also controlled by the intracellular building blocks necessary to support cellular growth. The energy-sensing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway relays information about the energy status of the cell to TORC1 by phosphorylating TSC2. Unlike the inactivating phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt, phosphorylation of TSC2 by AMPK promotes the GAP activity of the TSC complex (31). AMPK also phosphorylates Raptor, leading to decreased TORC1 activity (28). Thus, when energy levels are low, active AMPK inhibits TORC1.Amino acids also activate the TORC1 pathway, through a mechanism that requires Rheb, as well as the type III PI3′K VPS34 and the serine/threonine kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP4K3) (11, 22, 43). TORC1 thereby integrates information about the availability of amino acids and the amount of energy available for growth with growth factor signaling. Given its ancient function in adapting growth rates to environmental conditions, it is likely that TOR responds to a variety of stimuli, suggesting that many TOR control mechanisms remain to be uncovered. The Rag family of Ras-related small GTPases has recently been identified as a key component of the amino acid-sensing pathway, acting in parallel to Rheb (34, 58). Rag GTPases form heterodimers; RagA or RagB interacts with RagC or RagD. RagA and RagB are active when GTP bound, while RagC and RagD are active when bound to GDP (34, 58). Activation of the Rags by amino acids results in TOR relocalization to Rab7-containing vesicles (58). While the function of these vesicles in TORC1 signaling remains unclear, this relocalization is associated with increased TORC1 activity.TORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation and activation of components of the translational machinery, such as S6 kinase (S6K) and 4EBP1, an inhibitor of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) activity (reviewed in reference 27). S6K phosphorylates the S6 ribosomal subunit, thereby increasing translation. Mice deficient for S6K1 are small and have small pancreatic beta cells and a correspondingly low level of circulating insulin (45). Mutation of the phosphorylation sites on S6 results in a similar phenotype, with small beta cells and fibroblasts (57). In Drosophila, mutation of S6K again reduces both cell and organism size (42), as does the overexpression of 4EBP (41).Interestingly, while mutation of the TORC1 pathway in mammalian cells reduces cell size by 10 to 15%, ablation of core TORC1 pathway components in Drosophila cells can affect cell size by up to 40% (73). In an attempt to identify novel components of the TORC1 pathway, we undertook an RNA interference (RNAi)-based screen of Drosophila S2 cells. We reasoned that the extreme size phenotypes observed in Drosophila cells upon TORC1 manipulations would facilitate the identification of modulators. In order to increase the likelihood of isolating novel regulators of TOR, we uncoupled TOR activity from many of its known nutritional controls by depleting TSC2 and screened for double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) that could reverse the cell size increase elicited by loss of TSC2. Depletion of multiple components of the p38 pathway was found to revert the TSC2 RNAi-induced cell size increase. Furthermore, activation of p38 is necessary and sufficient for the activation of TOR. Strikingly, mutation of components of the stress-activated p38 pathway in Drosophila has a similar phenotype to mutations in the TOR and insulin signaling pathway: a cell-autonomous cell size decrease, reduced body size, and a sensitization to the effects of nutritional stress.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Inhibition of Selenium Metabolism in the Oral Pathogen Treponema denticola

In this report we provide evidence that the antimicrobial action of stannous salts and a gold drug, auranofin, against Treponema denticola is mediated through inhibition of the metabolism of selenium for synthesis of selenoproteins.The biological use of selenium as a catalyst, incorporated into proteins as selenocysteine, is broad. It plays an essential role in energy metabolism, redox balance, and reproduction in a variety of organisms, from bacterial pathogens to eukaryotic parasites to humans. The results of several epidemiological studies indicate that higher levels of selenium in the mammalian diet can have a negative effect on dental health (2, 17-19, 39). Although the impact of selenium is attributed to its influence on the physical properties of the enamel surface (10), the role of selenium in supporting the oral microbial community has not been studied.The oral cavity is a highly complex microbiome, with a large proportion of its residents uncharacterized due to their fastidious nature and resistance to traditional culture methods (11). Analysis of whole saliva indicates that bacterial metabolism influences the amino acid composition and indicates a role for amino acid fermentation (38). Curtis et al. demonstrated the occurrence of Stickland reactions in dental plaque (9). These reactions were first described in clostridia (35-37). They involve the coupled fermentation of amino acids in which one amino acid is oxidized (Stickland donor) and another (Stickland acceptor) is reduced (29). Treponema denticola, an established resident of the oral cavity, performs Stickland reactions via the selenoprotein glycine reductase (32). Glycine reductase is composed of a multiprotein complex that contains two separate selenoproteins, termed selenoprotein A and selenoprotein B (1, 7, 8, 15, 16). This complex of proteins converts glycine to acetyl phosphate by using inorganic phosphate and the reducing potential from thioredoxin. For the organisms that use this complex, this is a vital source of ATP. Thus far, the requirement for selenocysteine at the active site of this enzyme complex is universally conserved, even though all other selenoproteins that have been identified using computational techniques have a putative cysteine homologue (24).Treponema denticola is considered one of the primary pathogens responsible for periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease that is the major cause of adult tooth loss (11, 27, 33). It is the best-studied oral spirochete, commonly found with other spirochetes within the periodontal pocket. It expresses a variety of virulence factors and is capable of adhering to and penetrating endothelial cell monolayers (31). Its health impact may reach beyond the oral cavity. A recent study linked periodontitis with peripheral arterial disease and detected T. denticola, along with other periodontal pathogens, in atherosclerotic plaque (3). Sequence analysis indicates the presence of several selenoproteins in addition to glycine reductase within the genome of T. denticola (24). This organism exhibits a strict growth requirement for selenium (32).A significant literature exists that clearly demonstrates the antimicrobial activity of fluoride compounds against microorganisms associated with dental decay and periodontitis. Both sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride, as well as stannous ions alone, inhibit the growth of T. denticola (21). The inhibitory effect of stannous salts on T. denticola''s growth is unexplained. It should be noted that toothpastes containing stannous fluoride are more effective in reducing gingivitis and plaque (28, 30).Tin, as well as several other trace elements, modulates the effects of acute selenium toxicity (20). Conversely, selenium affects the activity of tin in animal models (4-6). In this study, we examine the possibility that stannous ions interfere with selenium metabolism in T. denticola.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.