Breadth of Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by Stable,Homogeneous Clade A and Clade C HIV-1 gp140 Envelope Trimers in Guinea Pigs

The native envelope (Env) spike on the surface of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is trimeric, and thus trimeric Env vaccine immunogens are currently being explored in preclinical immunogenicity studies. Key challenges have included the production and purification of biochemically homogeneous and stable trimers and the evaluation of these immunogens utilizing standardized virus panels for neutralization assays. Here we report the binding and neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses elicited by clade A (92UG037.8) and clade C (CZA97.012) Env gp140 trimer immunogens in guinea pigs. These trimers have been selected and engineered for optimal biochemical stability and have defined antigenic properties. Purified gp140 trimers with Ribi adjuvant elicited potent, cross-clade NAb responses against tier 1 viruses as well as detectable but low-titer NAb responses against select tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C. In particular, the clade C trimer elicited NAbs that neutralized 27%, 20%, and 47% of tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C, respectively. Heterologous DNA prime, protein boost as well as DNA prime, recombinant adenovirus boost regimens expressing these antigens, however, did not result in an increased magnitude or breadth of NAb responses in this system. These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of stable, homogeneous clade A and clade C gp140 trimers and exemplify the utility of standardized tier 1 and tier 2 virus panels for assessing the NAb responses of candidate HIV-1 Env immunogens.The development and evaluation of novel HIV-1 Env immunogens are critical priorities of the HIV-1 vaccine field (2, 10, 25). The major antigenic target for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is the trimeric Env glycoprotein on the virion surface (4, 18, 30). Monomeric gp120 immunogens have not elicited broadly reactive NAbs in animal models (5, 13, 28, 29) or humans (16, 31), and thus several groups have focused on generating trimer immunogens that better mimic the native Env spike found on virions (3, 7, 14, 15, 20, 22, 27). It has, however, proven difficult to produce stable and conformationally homogeneous Env trimers. Strategies to modify Env immunogens have therefore been explored, including the removal of the cleavage site between gp120 and gp41 (3, 7, 23, 39, 40), the incorporation of an intramolecular disulfide bond to stabilize cleaved gp120 and gp41 moieties (6), and the addition of trimerization motifs such as the T4 bacteriophage fibritin “fold-on” (Fd) domain (8, 17, 39).Preclinical evaluation of candidate Env immunogens is critical for concept testing and for the prioritization of vaccine candidates. Luciferase-based virus neutralization assays with TZM.bl cells (21, 24) have been developed as high-throughput assays that can be standardized (26). However, the optimal use of this assay requires the generation of standardized virus panels derived from multiple clades that reflect both easy-to-neutralize (tier 1) and primary isolate (tier 2) viruses (21, 24). A tiered approach for the evaluation of novel Env immunogens has been proposed, in which tier 1 viruses represent homologous vaccine strains and a small number of heterologous neutralization-sensitive viruses while tier 2 viruses provide a greater measure of neutralization breadth for the purpose of comparing immunogens (24).We screened a large panel of primary HIV-1 isolates for Env stability and identified two viruses, CZA97.012 (clade C) (32) and 92UG037.8 (clade A) (17), that yielded biochemically homogeneous and stable Env trimers with well defined and uniform antigenic properties (17). The addition of the T4 bacteriophage fibritin “fold-on” (Fd) trimerization domain further increased their yield and purity (17). In the present study, we assessed the immunogenicity of these stable clade A and clade C gp140 trimers in guinea pigs. Both trimers elicited high-titer binding antibody responses and cross-clade neutralization of select tier 1 viruses as well as low-titer but detectable NAb responses against select tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C. These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of these stable gp140 trimers and highlight the utility of standardized virus panels in the evaluation of novel HIV-1 Env immunogens.     

Effect of Mutations in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease on Cleavage of the gp41 Cytoplasmic Tail

We previously reported that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) develops resistance to the cholesterol-binding compound amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) by acquiring mutations (P203L and S205L) in the cytoplasmic tail of the transmembrane envelope glycoprotein gp41 that create cleavage sites for the viral protease (PR). In the present study, we observed that a PR inhibitor-resistant (PIR) HIV-1 mutant is unable to efficiently cleave the gp41 cytoplasmic tail in P203L and S205L virions, resulting in loss of AME resistance. To define the pathway to AME resistance in the context of the PIR PR, we selected for resistance with an HIV-1 isolate expressing the mutant enzyme. We identified a new gp41 mutation, R236L, that results in cleavage of the gp41 tail by the PIR PR. These results highlight the central role of gp41 cleavage as the primary mechanism of AME resistance.Cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains, often referred to as lipid rafts (4, 18, 24), play an important role in the replication of many enveloped viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (22, 30). Lipid rafts are involved in both HIV-1 entry and egress (reviewed in references 6, 22, and 30), and the lipid bilayer of HIV-1 virions is significantly enriched in cholesterol and highly saturated lipids characteristic of lipid rafts (3, 5, 8). We recently demonstrated that the cholesterol-binding polyene fungal antibiotic amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) potently inhibits HIV-1 replication. The antiviral activity of AME is due to a profound inhibition of viral entry (27, 28) and impairment of virus particle production (29).In our previous studies, we showed that the propagation of HIV-1 in the presence of AME leads to viral escape from this compound. The mutations that confer resistance map to the cytoplasmic tail (CT) of the gp41 transmembrane envelope (Env) glycoprotein (27, 28). AME-resistant mutants (P203L and S205L) overcome the defect in viral entry imposed by AME by a novel mechanism of resistance whereby the gp41 CT is cleaved by the viral protease (PR) after incorporation of Env into virions (28). The introduction of stop codons into the gp41-coding region that prematurely truncate the CT also renders virions AME resistant. In the present study, we evaluated the interplay between protease inhibitor resistance (PIR) mutations and AME resistance.     

Potent and Broadly Reactive HIV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by a Vaccinia Virus Vector Prime-C2V3C3 Polypeptide Boost Immunization Strategy

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects about 1 to 2 million individuals, the majority living in West Africa, Europe, and India. As for HIV-1, new strategies for the prevention of HIV-2 infection are needed. Our aim was to produce new vaccine immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive HIV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Native and truncated envelope proteins from the reference HIV-2ALI isolate were expressed in vaccinia virus or in bacteria. This source isolate was used due to its unique phenotype combining CD4 independence and CCR5 usage. NAbs were not elicited in BALB/c mice by single immunization with a truncated and fully glycosylated envelope gp125 (gp125t) or a recombinant polypeptide comprising the C2, V3, and C3 envelope regions (rpC2-C3). A strong and broad NAb response was, however, elicited in mice primed with gp125t expressed in vaccinia virus and boosted with rpC2-C3. Serum from these animals potently neutralized (median 50% neutralizing titer, 3,200) six of six highly divergent primary HIV-2 isolates. Coreceptor usage and the V3 sequence of NAb-sensitive isolates were similar to that of the vaccinating immunogen (HIV-2ALI). In contrast, NAbs were not reactive on three X4 isolates that displayed major changes in V3 loop sequence and structure. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that broadly reactive HIV-2 NAbs can be elicited by using a vaccinia virus vector-prime/rpC2-C3-boost immunization strategy and suggest a potential relationship between escape to neutralization and cell tropism.Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects 1 to 2 million individuals, most of whom live in India, West Africa, and Europe (17). HIV-2 has diversified into eight genetic groups named A to H, of which group A is by far the most prevalent worldwide. Nucleotide sequences of Env can differ up to 21% within a particular group and by over 35% between groups.The mortality rate in HIV-2-infected patients is at least twice that of uninfected individuals (26). Nonetheless, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals survive as elite controllers (17). In the absence of antiretroviral therapy, the numbers of infected cells (39) and viral loads (36) are much lower among HIV-2-infected individuals than among those who are HIV-1 infected. This may be related to a more effective immune response produced against HIV-2. In fact, most HIV-2-infected individuals have proliferative T-cell responses and strong cytotoxic responses to Env and Gag proteins (17, 31). Moreover, autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are raised in most HIV-2-infected individuals (8, 32, 48, 52), and the virus seems unable to escape from these antibodies (52). As for HIV-1, the antibody specificities that mediate HIV-2 neutralization and control are still elusive. The V3 region in the envelope gp125 has been identified as a neutralizing target by some but not by all investigators (3, 6, 7, 11, 40, 47, 54). Other weakly neutralizing epitopes were identified in the V1, V2, V4, and C5 regions in gp125 and in the COOH-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain (6, 7, 41). A better understanding of the neutralizing determinants in the HIV-2 Env will provide crucial information regarding the most relevant targets for vaccine design.The development of immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs is considered the number one priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field (4, 42). Most current HIV-1 vaccine candidates intended to elicit such broadly reactive NAbs are based on purified envelope constructs that mimic the structure of the most conserved neutralizing epitopes in the native trimeric Env complex and/or on the expression of wild-type or modified envelope glycoproteins by different types of expression vectors (4, 5, 29, 49, 58). With respect to HIV-2, purified gp125 glycoprotein or synthetic peptides representing selected V3 regions from HIV-2 strain SBL6669 induced autologous and heterologous NAbs in mice or guinea pigs (6, 7, 22). However, immunization of cynomolgus monkeys with a subunit vaccine consisting of gp130 (HIV-2BEN) micelles offered little protection against autologous or heterologous challenge (34). Immunization of rhesus (19, 44, 45) and cynomolgus (1) monkeys with canarypox or attenuated vaccinia virus expressing several HIV-2 SBL6669 proteins, including the envelope glycoproteins, in combination with booster immunizations with gp160, gp125, or V3 synthetic peptides, elicited a weak neutralizing response and partial protection against autologous HIV-2 challenge. Likewise, vaccination of rhesus monkeys with immunogens derived from the historic HIV-2ROD strain failed to generate neutralizing antibodies and to protect against heterologous challenge (55). Finally, baboons inoculated with a DNA vaccine expressing the tat, nef, gag, and env genes of the HIV-2UC2 group B isolate were partially protected against autologous challenge without the production of neutralizing antibodies (33). These studies illustrate the urgent need for new vaccine immunogens and/or vaccination strategies that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-2. The present study was designed to investigate in the mouse model the immunogenicity and neutralizing response elicited by novel recombinant envelope proteins derived from the reference primary HIV-2ALI isolate, when administered alone or in different prime-boost combinations.     

Crystallographic Definition of the Epitope Promiscuity of the Broadly Neutralizing Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Antibody 2F5: Vaccine Design Implications

The quest to create a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine capable of eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies against Env has been challenging. Among other problems, one difficulty in creating a potent immunogen resides in the substantial overall sequence variability of the HIV envelope protein. The membrane-proximal region (MPER) of gp41 is a particularly conserved tryptophan-rich region spanning residues 659 to 683, which is recognized by three broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs), 2F5, Z13, and 4E10. In this study, we first describe the variability of residues in the gp41 MPER and report on the invariant nature of 15 out of 25 amino acids comprising this region. Subsequently, we evaluate the ability of the bnMAb 2F5 to recognize 31 varying sequences of the gp41 MPER at a molecular level. In 19 cases, resulting crystal structures show the various MPER peptides bound to the 2F5 Fab′. A variety of amino acid substitutions outside the ⁶⁶⁴DKW⁶⁶⁶ core epitope are tolerated. However, changes at the ⁶⁶⁴DKW⁶⁶⁶ motif itself are restricted to those residues that preserve the aspartate''s negative charge, the hydrophobic alkyl-π stacking arrangement between the β-turn lysine and tryptophan, and the positive charge of the former. We also characterize a possible molecular mechanism of 2F5 escape by sequence variability at position 667, which is often observed in HIV-1 clade C isolates. Based on our results, we propose a somewhat more flexible molecular model of epitope recognition by bnMAb 2F5, which could guide future attempts at designing small-molecule MPER-like vaccines capable of eliciting 2F5-like antibodies.Eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) has been identified as a major milestone to attain in the quest for a vaccine in the fight against AIDS (12, 28). These antibodies would need to interact with HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins gp41 and/or gp120 (Env), target conserved regions and functional conformations of gp41/gp120 trimeric complexes, and prevent new HIV-1 fusion events with target cells (21, 57, 70, 71). Although a humoral response generating neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1 can be detected in HIV-1-positive individuals, the titers are often very low, and virus control is seldom achieved by these neutralizing antibodies (22, 51, 52, 66, 67). The difficulty in eliciting a broad and potent neutralizing antibody response against HIV-1 is thought to reside in the high degree of genetic diversity of the virus, in the heterogeneity of Env on the surface of HIV-1, and in the masking of functional regions by conformational covering, by an extensive glycan shield, or by the ability of some conserved domains to partition to the viral membrane (24, 25, 29, 30, 38, 39, 56, 68, 69). So far, vaccine trials using as immunogens mimics of Env in different conformations have primarily elicited antibodies with only limited neutralization potency across different HIV-1 clades although recent work has demonstrated more encouraging results (4, 12, 61).The use of conserved regions on gp41 and gp120 Env as targets for vaccine design has been mostly characterized by the very few anti-HIV-1 broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs) that recognize them: the CD4 binding-site on gp120 (bnMAb b12), a CD4-induced gp120 coreceptor binding site (bnMAbs 17b and X5), a mannose cluster on the outer face of gp120 (bnMAb 2G12), and the membrane proximal external region (MPER) of gp41 (bnMAbs 2F5, Z13 and 4E10) (13, 29, 44, 58, 73). The gp41 MPER region is a particularly conserved part of Env that spans residues 659 to 683 (HXB2 numbering) (37, 75). Substitution and deletion studies have linked this unusually tryptophan-rich region to the fusion process of HIV-1, possibly involving a series of conformational changes (5, 37, 41, 49, 54, 74). Additionally, the gp41 MPER has been implicated in gp41 oligomerization, membrane leakage ability facilitating pore formation, and binding to the galactosyl ceramide receptor on epithelial cells for initial mucosal infection mediated by transcytosis (2, 3, 40, 53, 63, 64, 72). This wide array of roles for the gp41 MPER will put considerable pressure on sequence conservation, and any change will certainly lead to a high cost in viral fitness.Monoclonal antibody 2F5 is a broadly neutralizing monoclonal anti-HIV-1 antibody isolated from a panel of sera from naturally infected asymptomatic individuals. It reacts with a core gp41 MPER epitope spanning residues 662 to 668 with the linear sequence ELDKWAS (6, 11, 42, 62, 75). 2F5 immunoglobulin G binding studies and screening of phage display libraries demonstrated that the DKW core is essential for 2F5 recognition and binding (15, 36, 50). Crystal structures of 2F5 with peptides representing its core gp41 epitope reveal a β-turn conformation involving the central DKW residues, flanked by an extended conformation and a canonical α-helical turn for residues located at the N terminus and C terminus of the core, respectively (9, 27, 45, 47). In addition to binding to its primary epitope, evidence is accumulating that 2F5 also undergoes secondary interactions: multiple reports have demonstrated affinity of 2F5 for membrane components, possibly through its partly hydrophobic flexible elongated complementarity-determining region (CDR) H3 loop, and it has also been suggested that 2F5 might interact in a secondary manner with other regions of gp41 (1, 10, 23, 32, 33, 55). Altogether, even though the characteristics of 2F5 interaction with its linear MPER consensus epitope have been described extensively, a number of questions persist about the exact mechanism of 2F5 neutralization at a molecular level.One such ambiguous area of the neutralization mechanism of 2F5 is investigated in this study. Indeed, compared to bnMAb 4E10, 2F5 is the more potent neutralizing antibody although its breadth across different HIV-1 isolates is more limited (6, 35). In an attempt to shed light on the exact molecular requirements for 2F5 recognition of its primary gp41 MPER epitope, we performed structural studies of 2F5 Fab′ with a variety of peptides. The remarkable breadth of possible 2F5 interactions reveals a somewhat surprising promiscuity of the 2F5 binding site. Furthermore, we link our structural observations with the natural variation observed within the gp41 MPER and discuss possible routes of 2F5 escape from a molecular standpoint. Finally, our discovery of 2F5''s ability to tolerate a rather broad spectrum of amino acids in its binding, a spectrum that even includes nonnatural amino acids, opens the door to new ways to design small-molecule immunogens potentially capable of eliciting 2F5-like neutralizing antibodies.     

Antagonism to and Intracellular Sequestration of Human Tetherin by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Envelope Glycoprotein

Tetherin (CD317/BST-2), an interferon-induced membrane protein, restricts the release of nascent retroviral particles from infected cell surfaces. While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the accessory gene vpu to overcome the action of tetherin, the lineage of primate lentiviruses that gave rise to HIV-2 does not. It has been previously reported that the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein has a Vpu-like function in promoting virus release. Here we demonstrate that the HIV-2 Rod envelope glycoprotein (HIV-2 Rod Env) is a tetherin antagonist. Expression of HIV-2 Rod Env, but not that of HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVmac1A11, counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction of Vpu-defective HIV-1 in a cell-type-specific manner. This correlates with the ability of the HIV-2 Rod Env to mediate cell surface downregulation of tetherin. Antagonism requires an endocytic motif conserved across HIV/SIV lineages in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail, but specificity for tetherin is governed by extracellular determinants in the mature Env protein. Coimmunoprecipitation studies suggest an interaction between HIV-2 Rod Env and tetherin, but unlike studies with Vpu, we found no evidence of tetherin degradation. In the presence of HIV-2 Rod Env, tetherin localization is restricted to the trans-Golgi network, suggesting Env-mediated effects on tetherin trafficking sequester it from virus assembly sites on the plasma membrane. Finally, we recapitulated these observations in HIV-2-infected CD4⁺ T-cell lines, demonstrating that tetherin antagonism and sequestration occur at physiological levels of Env expression during virus replication.Various stages of the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses can be targeted by host antiviral restriction factors (reviewed in reference 49). In addition to the well-characterized antiviral effects of members of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, particularly APOBEC3G and -3F, and species-specific variants of tripartite motif family 5α, the release of nascent retroviral particles has recently been shown to be a target for a novel restriction factor, tetherin (CD317/bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 [BST-2]) (31, 46). Tetherin is an interferon-inducible gene that was originally shown to impart a restriction on the release of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that lack a vpu gene (31, 46). In tetherin-positive cells, mature Vpu-defective HIV-1 particles are retained on the cell surface, linked to the plasma membrane (PM) and each other via protease-sensitive tethers, and can be subsequently endocytosed and accumulate in late endosomes (30, 31). Tetherin is not HIV specific and restricts the release of virus-like particles derived from all retroviruses tested (18), as well as those of filoviruses and arenaviruses (18, 19, 39).Tetherin is a small (181-amino-acid) type II membrane protein with an unusual topology that exists mainly as a disulfide-linked dimer (34). It consists of an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane anchor, an extracellular domain that includes three cysteine residues important for dimerization, a putative coiled-coil, and finally a glycophosphatidyinosityl-linked lipid anchor (22) that is essential for restriction (31). Tetherin localizes to retroviral assembly sites on the PM (18, 31), and this unusual structure is highly suggestive that tetherin restricts virion release by incorporation into the viral membrane and cross-linking virions to cells. Such a mechanism would make tetherin a powerful antiviral effector that can target an obligate part of most, if not all, enveloped virus assembly strategies. Moreover, since tetherin restriction has no specific requirement for virus protein sequences, to avoid its action, mammalian viruses have evolved to encode several distinct countermeasures that specifically inhibit tetherin''s antiviral function.The Vpu accessory protein antagonizes tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (31, 46). In the presence of Vpu, tetherin is downregulated from the cell surface (2, 46) and is targeted for degradation (10, 13, 14), although whether these processes are required for antagonism of tetherin function is unclear (27). HIV-1 Vpu displays a distinct species specificity in that it is unable to target tetherin orthologues from rhesus macaques or African green monkeys (14, 25). This differential sensitivity maps to the tetherin transmembrane domain, particularly residues that are predicted to have been under high positive selection pressure during primate evolution (14, 16, 25). This suggests that tetherin evolution may have been driven in part by viral countermeasures like Vpu. Vpu, however, is only encoded by HIV-1 and its direct simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) lineage precursors. The majority of SIVs, including the SIVsm, the progenitor of both HIV-2 and SIVmac, do not encode a Vpu protein (21). In some of these SIVs, tetherin antagonism was recently shown to map to the nef gene (16, 51). SIV Nef proteins, however, are generally ineffective against human tetherin because they target a (G/D)DIWK motif that was deleted from the human tetherin cytoplasmic tail sometime after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees (51). This raises the question of how HIV-2 is able to overcome human tetherin, as recent data show chronically HIV-2-infected CEM T cells have reduced tetherin levels on their surface (10).Interestingly, it has long been known that the envelope glycoprotein of certain HIV-2 isolates can stimulate the release of Vpu-defective HIV-1 virions from cells we now know to be tetherin positive (5, 6, 43). HIV and SIV Envs form trimeric spikes of dimers of the surface subunit (SU-gp105 in HIV-2/SIVmac and gp120 in HIV-1) that bind CD4 and the chemokine coreceptor and gp41 (the transmembrane [TM] subunit that facilitates fusion with and entry into the target cell). Envelope precursors (gp140 or gp160) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they become glycosylated and are exported to the surface via the secretory pathway (8). During transit through the Golgi apparatus and possibly in endosomal compartments, the immature precursors are cleaved by furin-like proteases to form mature spikes (15, 29). Multiple endocytosis motifs in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail lead to only minor quantities of Env being exposed at the cell surface at any given time (7, 40). Recent data demonstrated that the conserved GYxxθ motif, a binding site for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 (3), in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-2 gp41 is required to promote Vpu-defective HIV-1 release from HeLa cells (1, 32). Based on experiments with HIV-1/HIV-2 chimeric envelopes, an additional requirement in the extracellular component was suggested (1). In this study we set out to examine the Vpu-like activity of HIV-2 envelope in light of the discovery of tetherin. We demonstrate that the HIV-2 Env is a tetherin antagonist, and we provide mechanistic insight into the basis of this antagonism.     

Fundamental Difference in the Content of High-Mannose Carbohydrate in the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Lineages

The virus-encoded envelope proteins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) typically contain 26 to 30 sites for N-linked carbohydrate attachment. N-linked carbohydrate can be of three major types: high mannose, complex, or hybrid. The lectin proteins from Galanthus nivalis (GNA) and Hippeastrum hybrid (HHA), which specifically bind high-mannose carbohydrate, were found to potently inhibit the replication of a pathogenic cloned SIV from rhesus macaques, SIVmac239. Passage of SIVmac239 in the presence of escalating concentrations of GNA and HHA yielded a lectin-resistant virus population that uniformly eliminated three sites (of 26 total) for N-linked carbohydrate attachment (Asn-X-Ser or Asn-X-Thr) in the envelope protein. Two of these sites were in the gp120 surface subunit of the envelope protein (Asn244 and Asn460), and one site was in the envelope gp41 transmembrane protein (Asn625). Maximal resistance to GNA and HHA in a spreading infection was conferred to cloned variants that lacked all three sites in combination. Variant SIV gp120s exhibited dramatically decreased capacity for binding GNA compared to SIVmac239 gp120 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Purified gp120s from six independent HIV type 1 (HIV-1) isolates and two SIV isolates from chimpanzees (SIVcpz) consistently bound GNA in ELISA at 3- to 10-fold-higher levels than gp120s from five SIV isolates from rhesus macaques or sooty mangabeys (SIVmac/sm) and four HIV-2 isolates. Thus, our data indicate that characteristic high-mannose carbohydrate contents have been retained in the cross-species transmission lineages for SIVcpz-HIV-1 (high), SIVsm-SIVmac (low), and SIVsm-HIV-2 (low).The envelope proteins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) are heavily glycosylated. N-linked carbohydrate is attached to the nascent protein at the asparagine of the consensus sequence N-X-S or N-X-T, where X is any amino acid except a proline (31, 52, 53). The number of potential N-linked carbohydrate attachment sites in the surface subunit of Env (gp120) ranges from 18 to 33, with a median of 25 (34, 65). There are typically 3 or 4 potential N-linked sites in the ectodomain of the Env transmembrane protein (gp41) (34).N-linked glycosylation of a protein consists of the en bloc transfer of the carbohydrate core oligosaccharide (two N-acetylglucosamines, nine mannoses, and three glucoses) from dolichol to the asparagine of the N-linked attachment site (8, 60). Initially the attached carbohydrate is processed into the high-mannose type (8). In the Golgi complex, high-mannose carbohydrate may be further processed into complex or hybrid oligosaccharides (58). Incomplete processing of N-linked carbohydrate results in the production of high-mannose carbohydrate chains, which terminate in mannose (58). Fully processed complex carbohydrate chains terminate in galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, sialic acid, or glucose (33, 57). Hybrid carbohydrate chains have two branches from the core, one that terminates in mannose and one that terminates in a sugar of the complex type (63).Glycoproteins exist as a heterogeneous population, exhibiting heterogeneity with respect to the proportion of potential glycosylation sites that are occupied and to the oligosaccharide structure observed at each site. Factors that influence the type of carbohydrate chain that is attached at any one N-linked site are the accessibility of the carbohydrate chain to processing enzymes (49), protein sequences surrounding the site (5, 40), and the type of cell from which the protein is produced (19).The N-linked carbohydrate chains of HIV and SIV Env are critical for the proper folding and cleavage of the fusion-competent envelope spike (20, 59, 61). After Env is assembled, enzymatic removal of N-linked carbohydrate does not dramatically affect the functional conformation (2, 6, 7, 13, 24, 38). It is generally accepted that the carbohydrate attached to Env limits the ability of the underlying protein to be recognized by B cells (11, 48, 62). This carbohydrate also shields protein epitopes that would otherwise be the direct targets of antibodies that neutralize viral infection (41, 48, 62, 64). Furthermore, the high-mannose carbohydrates of HIV and SIV Env bind dynamically to an array of lectin proteins that are part of the host lymphoreticular system. The interaction of viral high-mannose carbohydrate with host lectin proteins has been associated with the enhancement (9, 16, 17, 43-45) or suppression (42, 56) of viral infection of CD4-positive T cells. The high-mannose carbohydrate of Env is also known to activate the release of immune-modulatory proteins from a subset of host antigen-presenting cells (12, 54).The plant lectin proteins from Galanthus nivalis (GNA) and Hippeastrum hybrid (HHA) specifically bind terminal α-1,3- and/or α-1,6-mannose of high-mannose oligosaccharides but not hybrid oligosaccharides (28, 55). GNA and HHA inhibit the replication of HIV-1 and SIVmac251, and uncloned, resistant populations of virus have been selected (3, 14). In this report, we define two N-linked sites in the external surface glycoprotein gp120 and one in the transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 whose mutation imparts high-level resistance to the inhibitory effects of GNA and HHA to cloned SIVmac239. Furthermore, using a GNA-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we show that assorted HIV-1 and SIVcpz gp120s consistently are considerably higher in mannose content than assorted gp120s from SIVmac, SIVsm, and HIV-2. These results shed new light on the impact of virus-host evolutionary dynamics on viral carbohydrate composition, and they may have important implications for the mechanisms by which long-standing natural hosts such as sooty mangabeys can resist generalized lymphoid activation and disease despite high levels of SIV replication.     

Neutralization Efficiency Is Greatly Enhanced by Bivalent Binding of an Antibody to Epitopes in the V4 Region and the Membrane-Proximal External Region within One Trimer of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Glycoproteins

Most antibodies are multivalent, with the potential to bind with high avidity. However, neutralizing antibodies commonly bind to virions monovalently. Bivalent binding of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to a virion has been documented only in a single case. Thus, the role of high avidity in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses has not been defined clearly. In this study, we demonstrated that when an artificial 2F5 epitope was inserted in the gp120 V4 region so that an HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer contains a natural 2F5 epitope in the gp41 membrane-proximal envelope region (MPER) and an artificially engineered 2F5 epitope in the gp120 V4 region, bivalent 2F5 IgG achieved greatly enhanced neutralization efficiency, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) decrease over a 2-log scale. In contrast, the monovalent 2F5 Fab fragment did not exhibit any appreciable change in neutralization efficiency in the same context. These results demonstrate that bivalent binding of 2F5 IgG to a single HIV-1 Env trimer results in dramatic enhancement of neutralization, probably through an increase in binding avidity. Furthermore, we demonstrated that bivalent binding of MAb 2F5 to the V4 region and MPER of an HIV-1 Env trimer can be achieved only in a specific configuration, providing an important insight into the structure of a native/infectious HIV-1 Env trimer. This specific binding configuration also establishes a useful standard that can be applied to evaluate the biological relevance of structural information on the HIV-1 Env trimer.Immunoglobulin molecules have multiple binding paratopes for antigens; for example, those for IgG1 are bivalent and those for IgM are dodecavalent. It is obvious that multivalent binding is required for the distinct mechanism of neutralization by cross-linking multiple virions to form virus aggregates (reviewed in references 7 and 67). Despite the potential of antibodies for multivalent binding, structural evidence indicates that neutralizing antibodies often bind to an individual virion in a monovalent fashion (19, 20, 27, 29, 50, 53; reviewed in references 12 and 22). Bivalent binding of an antibody to a virion has been documented with clear structural evidence in only one case, in which monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 17-IA and 8F5 bind to virions of human rhinovirus 14 (HRV14) and HRV2 (19, 43). Even in this unique case, binding bivalency appears to contribute to the neutralization potency of 17-IA but not to that of 8F5 (19, 42, 43). Moreover, these MAbs bind to two hydrophobic canyon structures formed by viral proteins VP1 and VP2 and not to antigenic epitopes within individual viral capsid protomers; thus, this case may represent an exception to the common form of antibody/antigen interactions in which the antibodies bind to individual antigens. Therefore, it is not clear what role antibody-binding multivalency plays in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses at the level of interaction between antibody molecules and individual virions.The binding affinity of an antibody to its target is defined by intrinsic affinity and avidity (reviewed in reference 16). Intrinsic affinity is the force of monovalent binding between an antibody paratope and an antigenic epitope, often measured by binding a Fab fragment to an antigen. Avidity is the additive or synergistic force of engaging multiple antibody paratope/antigen epitope pairs between one antibody and one antigen. In other words, avidity is a functional consequence of antibody-binding multivalency. The effect of avidity on affinity is readily demonstrated in biochemical reactions such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), in which high-density antigenic sites are available without distinct spatial restrictions. It is commonly assumed that both affinity and avidity have functional consequences in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses (reviewed in references 7 and 67). At the level of individual virions, the contribution of antibody-binding avidity to neutralization efficiency is often based on two types of experiments. In one, results from a side-by-side comparison between an antibody and its Fab fragment are often reported as evidence supporting a role of antibody-binding multivalency in virus neutralization. However, the interpretation of this type of experiment is complicated by the size difference between an antibody and a Fab fragment, since steric hindrance is a major mechanism of neutralization (reviewed in references 6 and 23). In a second type of experiment, a correlation between neutralization efficiency and the ability of the antibody/virus complex to resist chemical stress without dissociation in the presence of a high concentration of salt in solution is interpreted to support a contributing effect from antibody-binding avidity to neutralization efficiency (2, 21, 36, 49, 51). Data from this type of experiment are limited mostly to measuring binding affinity that is below the affinity required for virus neutralization. Furthermore, these studies often do not distinguish between avidity effects caused by an antibody binding to two (or more) epitopes on one antigen or to multiple epitopes from different molecules on the virion. Therefore, like the situation with antibody-binding multivalency, it remains unclear whether binding avidity contributes to antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses at the level of individual virions.The envelope glycoproteins (Envs) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) exist on the virion or cell surface as trimers of gp120 and gp41 heterodimers (13, 30, 62, 65). High-resolution structural information for a native HIV-1 Env trimer is critically important for understanding the function of HIV-1 Envs as well as for guiding the development of an effective immunogen to elicit broad and potent neutralizing antibody responses. X-ray crystal structures of the gp41 ectodomain fragments in the postfusion conformation have been resolved; however, a high-resolution structure of gp41 in the prefusion conformation is still unavailable and likely will be more informative for understanding the function of HIV-1 Env trimers (9, 47, 52). Two X-ray crystal structures of the gp120 core in both the CD4-liganded and unliganded conformations have been solved, but the biological meanings of these structures, especially how they are related to the native, functional Env trimer, are still being debated (10, 26). Several low-resolution structures of the Env trimers from HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) have been determined using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) tomography (4, 30, 62, 64, 65, 66). The predicted structures for the Env trimer are in general quite different between the two studies, and the difference is particularly dramatic around the gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER). A high-resolution structure of the native HIV-1 Env trimer is needed to resolve these differences. In the meantime, a distinctive standard needs to be developed for evaluating the biological relevance of structural information of an HIV-1 Env trimer.Our previous studies of the stoichiometry of antibody-mediated neutralization of HIV-1 Env indicated that MAbs b12, 2G12, and 2F5 neutralize by a stoichiometry designated T=1, i.e., one antibody binds to and neutralizes one HIV-1 Env trimer (57). Furthermore, when an artificial epitope (FLAG) was inserted in the V4 region of HIV-1 gp120, an epitope-specific anti-FLAG MAb achieved neutralization by the mechanism of steric hindrance (37, 61). Using the well-defined 2F5 neutralizing epitope as a model system (35, 39, 45), we constructed HIV-1 Env proteins carrying one 2F5 epitope in the gp120 V4 region and another 2F5 epitope in the gp41 MPER. Here, we investigated whether binding bivalency leads to enhancement in neutralization efficiency. By studying the detailed requirement for binding bivalency, we also probed the structure of the native, functional HIV-1 Env trimer, aiming to establish a standard that can be employed to evaluate the biological relevance of structural information on the HIV-1 Env trimer.     

Transitions to and from the CD4-Bound Conformation Are Modulated by a Single-Residue Change in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Inner Domain

Binding to the primary receptor CD4 induces conformational changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 envelope glycoprotein that allow binding to the coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4) and ultimately trigger viral membrane-cell membrane fusion mediated by the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein. Here we report the derivation of an HIV-1 gp120 variant, H66N, that confers envelope glycoprotein resistance to temperature extremes. The H66N change decreases the spontaneous sampling of the CD4-bound conformation by the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, thus diminishing CD4-independent infection. The H66N change also stabilizes the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex once the CD4-bound state is achieved, decreasing the probability of CD4-induced inactivation and revealing the enhancing effects of soluble CD4 binding on HIV-1 infection. In the CD4-bound conformation, the highly conserved histidine 66 is located between the receptor-binding and gp41-interactive surfaces of gp120. Thus, a single amino acid change in this strategically positioned gp120 inner domain residue influences the propensity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions to and from the CD4-bound state.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the cause of AIDS (6, 29, 66), infects target cells by direct fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. The viral fusion complex is composed of gp120 and gp41 envelope glycoproteins, which are organized into trimeric spikes on the surface of the virus (10, 51, 89). Membrane fusion is initiated by direct binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor on target cells (17, 41, 53). CD4 binding creates a second binding site on gp120 for the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, which serve as coreceptors (3, 12, 19, 23, 25). Coreceptor binding is thought to lead to further conformational changes in the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins that facilitate the fusion of viral and cell membranes. The formation of an energetically stable six-helix bundle by the gp41 ectodomain contributes to the membrane fusion event (9, 10, 79, 89, 90).The energy required for viral membrane-cell membrane fusion derives from the sequential transitions that the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins undergo, from the high-energy unliganded state to the low-energy six-helix bundle. The graded transitions down this energetic slope are initially triggered by CD4 binding (17). The interaction of HIV-1 gp120 with CD4 is accompanied by an unusually large change in entropy, which is thought to indicate the introduction of order into the conformationally flexible unliganded gp120 glycoprotein (61). In the CD4-bound state, gp120 is capable of binding CCR5 with high affinity; moreover, CD4 binding alters the quaternary structure of the envelope glycoprotein complex, resulting in the exposure of gp41 ectodomain segments (27, 45, 77, 92). The stability of the intermediate state induced by CD4 binding depends upon several variables, including the virus (HIV-1 versus HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus [SIV]), the temperature, and the nature of the CD4 ligand (CD4 on a target cell membrane versus soluble forms of CD4 [sCD4]) (30, 73). For HIV-1 exposed to sCD4, if CCR5 binding occurs within a given period of time, progression along the entry pathway continues. If CCR5 binding is impeded or delayed, the CD4-bound envelope glycoprotein complex decays into inactive states (30). In extreme cases, the binding of sCD4 to the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins induces the shedding of gp120 from the envelope glycoprotein trimer (31, 56, 58). Thus, sCD4 generally inhibits HIV-1 infection by triggering inactivation events, in addition to competing with CD4 anchored in the target cell membrane (63).HIV-1 isolates vary in sensitivity to sCD4, due in some cases to a low affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for CD4 and in other cases to differences in propensity to undergo inactivating conformational transitions following CD4 binding (30). HIV-1 isolates that have been passaged extensively in T-cell lines (the tissue culture laboratory-adapted [TCLA] isolates) exhibit lower requirements for CD4 than primary HIV-1 isolates (16, 63, 82). TCLA viruses bind sCD4 efficiently and are generally sensitive to neutralization compared with primary HIV-1 isolates. Differences in sCD4 sensitivity between primary and TCLA HIV-1 strains have been mapped to the major variable loops (V1/V2 and V3) of the gp120 glycoprotein (34, 42, 62, 81). Sensitivity to sCD4 has been shown to be independent of envelope glycoprotein spike density or the intrinsic stability of the envelope glycoprotein complex (30, 35).In general, HIV-1 isolates are more sensitive to sCD4 neutralization than HIV-2 or SIV isolates (4, 14, 73). The relative resistance of SIV to sCD4 neutralization can in some cases be explained by a reduced affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for sCD4 (57); however, at least some SIV isolates exhibit sCD4-induced activation of entry into CD4-negative, CCR5-expressing target cells that lasts for several hours after exposure to sCD4 (73). Thus, for some primate immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins, activated intermediates in the CD4-bound conformation can be quite stable.The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements important for receptor binding, subunit interaction, and membrane fusion are well conserved among different viral strains (71, 91). Thus, these elements represent potential targets for inhibitors of HIV-1 entry. Understanding the structure and longevity of the envelope glycoprotein intermediates along the virus entry pathway is relevant to attempts at inhibition. For example, peptides that target the heptad repeat 1 region of gp41 exhibit major differences in potency against HIV-1 strains related to efficiency of chemokine receptor binding (20, 21), which is thought to promote the conformational transition to the next step in the virus entry cascade. The determinants of the duration of exposure of targetable HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements during the entry process are undefined.To study envelope glycoprotein determinants of the movement among the distinct conformational states along the HIV-1 entry pathway, we attempted to generate HIV-1 variants that exhibit improved stability. Historically, labile viral elements have been stabilized by selecting virus to replicate under conditions, such as high temperature, that typically weaken protein-protein interactions (38, 39, 76, 102). Thus, we subjected HIV-1 to repeated incubations at temperatures between 42°C and 56°C, followed by expansion and analysis of the remaining replication-competent virus fraction. In this manner, we identified an envelope glycoprotein variant, H66N, in which histidine 66 in the gp120 N-terminal segment was altered to asparagine. The resistance of HIV-1 bearing the H66N envelope glycoproteins to changes in temperature has been reported elsewhere (37). Here, we examine the effect of the H66N change on the ability of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions, either spontaneously or in the presence of sCD4. The H66N phenotype was studied in the context of both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent HIV-1 variants.     

gp340 Promotes Transcytosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Genital Tract-Derived Cell Lines and Primary Endocervical Tissue

The human scavenger receptor gp340 has been identified as a binding protein for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope that is expressed on the cell surface of female genital tract epithelial cells. This interaction allows such epithelial cells to efficiently transmit infective virus to susceptible targets and maintain viral infectivity for several days. Within the context of vaginal transmission, HIV must first traverse a normally protective mucosa containing a cell barrier to reach the underlying T cells and dendritic cells, which propagate and spread the infection. The mechanism by which HIV-1 can bypass an otherwise healthy cellular barrier remains an important area of study. Here, we demonstrate that genital tract-derived cell lines and primary human endocervical tissue can support direct transcytosis of cell-free virus from the apical to basolateral surfaces. Further, this transport of virus can be blocked through the addition of antibodies or peptides that directly block the interaction of gp340 with the HIV-1 envelope, if added prior to viral pulsing on the apical side of the cell or tissue barrier. Our data support a role for the previously described heparan sulfate moieties in mediating this transcytosis but add gp340 as an important facilitator of HIV-1 transcytosis across genital tract tissue. This study demonstrates that HIV-1 actively traverses the protective barriers of the human genital tract and presents a second mechanism whereby gp340 can promote heterosexual transmission.Through correlative studies with macaques challenged with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the initial targets of infection in nontraumatic vaginal exposure to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been identified as subepithelial T cells and dendritic cells (DCs) (18, 23, 31, 36-38). While human transmission may differ from macaque transmission, the existing models of human transmission remain controversial. For the virus to successfully reach its CD4⁺ targets, HIV must first traverse the columnar mucosal epithelial cell barrier of the endocervix or uterus or the stratified squamous barrier of the vagina or ectocervix, whose normal functions include protection of underlying tissue from pathogens. This portion of the human innate immune defense system represents a significant impediment to transmission. Studies have placed the natural transmission rate of HIV per sexual act between 0.005 and 0.3% (17, 45). Breaks in the epithelial barrier caused by secondary infection with other sexual transmitted diseases or the normal physical trauma often associated with vaginal intercourse represent one potential means for viral exposure to submucosal cells and have been shown to significantly increase transmission (reviewed in reference 11). However, studies of nontraumatic exposure to SIV in macaques demonstrate that these disruptions are not necessary for successful transmission to healthy females. This disparity indicates that multiple mechanisms by which HIV-1 can pass through mucosal epithelium might exist in vivo. Identifying these mechanisms represents an important obstacle to understanding and ultimately preventing HIV transmission.Several host cellular receptors, including DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing integrin, galactosyl ceramide, mannose receptor, langerin, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, have been identified that facilitate disease progression through binding of HIV virions without being required for fusion and infection (2, 3, 12, 14, 16, 25, 29, 30, 43, 46, 50). These host accessory proteins act predominately through glycosylation-based interactions between HIV envelope (Env) and the host cellular receptors. These different host accessory factors can lead to increased infectivity in cis and trans or can serve to concentrate and expose virus at sites relevant to furthering its spread within the body. The direct transcytosis of cell-free virus through primary genital epithelial cells and the human endometrial carcinoma cell line HEC1A has been described (7, 9); this is, in part, mediated by HSPGs (7). Within the HSPG family, the syndecans have been previously shown to facilitate trans infection of HIV in vitro through binding of a specific region of Env that is moderately conserved (7, 8). This report also demonstrates that while HSPGs mediate a portion of the viral transcytosis that occurs in these two cell types, a significant portion of the observed transport occurs through an HSPG-independent mechanism. Other host cell factors likely provide alternatives to HSPGs for HIV-1 to use in subverting the mucosal epithelial barrier.gp340 is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) family of innate immune receptors. Its numerous splice variants can be found as a secreted component of human saliva (34, 41, 42) and as a membrane-associated receptor in a large number of epithelial cell lineages (22, 32, 40). Its normal cellular function includes immune surveillance of bacteria (4-6, 44), interaction with influenza A virus (19, 20, 32, 51) and surfactant proteins in the lung (20, 22, 33), and facilitating epithelial cell regeneration at sites of cellular inflammation and damage (27, 32). The secreted form of gp340, salivary agglutinin (SAG), was identified as a component of saliva that inhibits HIV-1 transmission in the oral pharynx through a specific interaction with the viral envelope protein that serves to agglutinate the virus and target it for degradation (34, 35, 41). Interestingly, SAG was demonstrated to form a direct protein-protein interaction with HIV Env (53, 54). Later, a cell surface-associated variant of SAG called gp340 was characterized as a binding partner for HIV-1 in the female genital tract that could facilitate virus transmission to susceptible targets of infection (47) and as a macrophage-expressed enhancer of infection (10).     

Truncation of the Membrane-Spanning Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein Defines Elements Required for Fusion,Incorporation, and Infectivity

The membrane-spanning domain (MSD) of the envelope (Env) glycoprotein from human (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency viruses plays a key role in anchoring the Env complex into the viral membrane but also contributes to its biological function in fusion and virus entry. In HIV type 1 (HIV-1), it has been predicted to span 27 amino acids, from lysine residue 681 to arginine 707, and encompasses an internal arginine at residue 694. By examining a series of C-terminal-truncation mutants of the HIV-1 gp41 glycoprotein that substituted termination codons for amino acids 682 to 708, we show that this entire region is required for efficient viral infection of target cells. Truncation to the arginine at residue 694 resulted in an Env complex that was secreted from the cells. In contrast, a region from residues 681 to 698, which contains highly conserved hydrophobic residues and glycine motifs and extends 4 amino acids beyond 694R, can effectively anchor the protein in the membrane, allow efficient transport to the plasma membrane, and mediate wild-type levels of cell-cell fusion. However, these fusogenic truncated Env mutants are inefficiently incorporated into budding virions. Based on the analysis of these mutants, a “snorkeling” model, in which the flanking charged amino acid residues at 681 and 694 are buried in the lipid while their side chains interact with polar head groups, is proposed for the HIV-1 MSD.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is initiated by fusion of the viral membrane with that of the target cell and is mediated by the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env). HIV-1 Env, a type 1 membrane-spanning glycoprotein, is a trimeric complex composed of three noncovalently linked heterodimers of gp120, the receptor-binding surface (SU) component, and gp41, the membrane-spanning, transmembrane (TM) component (12, 26, 44, 45). The gp120 and gp41 glycoproteins are synthesized as a precursor gp160 glycoprotein, which is encoded by the env gene. The gp160 precursor is cotranslationally glycosylated and, following transport to the trans-Golgi network, is cleaved into the mature products by a member of the furin family of endoproteases (45). Mature Env proteins are transported to the plasma membrane, where they are rapidly endocytosed or incorporated into virions (5, 33, 43). Recent evidence suggests that endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of Env is required for its interaction with Gag precursors and for efficient assembly into virions (20).HIV-1 Env molecules function as quasistable “spring-loaded” fusion machines. Recent studies have suggested that several regions of gp120 are reoriented following CD4 binding so that a planar “bridging sheet,” which forms the binding site for the coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4), can form (6, 7). Coreceptor binding is necessary for additional conformational changes in gp41 and for complete fusion (3). The gp41 monomer has three subdomains, an ectodomain, a membrane-spanning domain (MSD), and a cytoplasmic domain (39). The ectodomain of gp41, which mediates membrane fusion, is composed of a fusion peptide, two heptad repeats, and a tryptophan-rich membrane-proximal external region. Following the binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor and the CCR5/CXCR4 coreceptor, conformational changes are induced in Env that result in the exposure of the gp41 fusion peptide (32). This peptide inserts into the target cell membrane, allowing gp41 to form a bridge between the viral and cellular membranes. Interaction of the heptad repeats to form a six-helix bundle then brings the target and viral membranes together, allowing membrane fusion to occur (24).While heptad repeat regions 1 and 2 in the N-terminal ectodomain play key roles in Env-mediated fusion by bringing the viral and cell membranes into close proximity, an important function of gp41 is to anchor the glycoprotein complex within the host-derived viral membrane (18). The precise boundaries of the HIV-1 MSD have not been clearly defined; however, the MSD is one of the most conserved regions in the gp41 sequence. Based on the initial functional studies of HIV-1, the MSD of Env was defined as a stretch of 25 predominantly hydrophobic amino acids that span residues K681 to R705 in the NL4-3 sequence (14, 16, 18). These residues were suggested to cross the viral membrane in the form of an alpha helix, the length of which is approximately equal to the theoretical depth of a membrane bilayer. A major caveat of this model is that it places a basic amino acid residue (R694) into the hydrophobic center of the lipid bilayer. While some transmembrane proteins do contain charged amino acid residues in their MSDs, it is normally considered to be energetically unfavorable without some mechanism to neutralize the charge (8, 13). Point mutation studies have yielded varying results, but in general, substitution of K681 is detrimental to fusion and infectivity while mutation of R694 or R705 has only a limited effect on these activities (16, 29). On the other hand, accumulating data argue for a different intramembrane structure of the HIV-1 MSD. Serial small deletions (3 amino acid residues) in the region between R694 and R705 showed normal cell-cell fusion, although larger deletions were detrimental (29), suggesting that, with respect to the biological functions of the Env glycoprotein, the length of this region is more important than its amino acid conservation.Previous C-terminal-truncation studies of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Env (19, 41) suggested that the entire 27-amino-acid region is not required for the biological function of the protein. In the case of SIV, only the 15 apolar amino acids flanked by K689 and R705 (equivalent to K681 and R694 in HIV) and 6 additional amino acids (for a total of 23 amino acids) were required for near-wild-type (WT) fusion (19, 41). Two subsequent residues were required (total, 25 amino acids) for virus-cell entry and infectivity, while a length of 21 amino acid residues was sufficient for SIV Env to be incorporated into viral particles. These results led to a basic amino acid “snorkeling” model for the SIV MSD (41). In this model, the lysine and arginine (NL4-3 equivalents of K681 and R694) are buried in the lipid bilayer, while their long side chains are proposed to extend outward to the membrane surface and present the positively charged amino groups to the negatively charged head groups of the lipid bilayers. Applied to HIV-1 MSD, this model predicts a hydrophobic intramembrane core of only 12 amino acid residues (compared to 15 amino acid residues in the SIV MSD) between K681 and R694. The hydrophobic region C-terminal to K681 is not sufficient to effectively anchor the protein, since mutation of R694 to a stop codon yielded a nonfunctional protein that appeared to be retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (11). This contrasts with truncation experiments with the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G glycoprotein, which have shown that a region of 12 hydrophobic amino acids flanked by basic residues is sufficient to anchor the protein in the membrane (1).In order to understand if the “snorkeling” model is applicable to the HIV-1 MSD, we constructed a series of nonsense mutants with HIV-1 gp41 truncated in single-amino-acid steps at the C terminus from residue R707 to residue R694. For each mutant Env, we determined the membrane stability, fusogenicity, and ability to mediate infectivity. The results of these studies suggest that the 12-residue “core” (36) plus three subsequent hydrophobic amino acids is the minimal anchor domain for HIV-1 Env, as well as the minimal sequence to mediate cell-cell fusion. In contrast to SIV Env, HIV-1 Env requires the entire 25-amino-acid region from K681 to R707 to mediate near-WT incorporation and infectivity.     

Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Counteracts BST-2/Tetherin Restriction in a Sequence-Independent Manner That Does Not Require Tetherin Surface Removal

BST-2/tetherin is an interferon-inducible protein that restricts the release of enveloped viruses from the surface of infected cells by physically linking viral and cellular membranes. It is present at both the cell surface and in a perinuclear region, and viral anti-tetherin factors including HIV-1 Vpu and HIV-2 Env have been shown to decrease the cell surface population. To map the domains of human tetherin necessary for both virus restriction and sensitivity to viral anti-tetherin factors, we constructed a series of tetherin derivatives and assayed their activity. We found that the cytoplasmic tail (CT) and transmembrane (TM) domains of tetherin alone produced its characteristic cellular distribution, while the ectodomain of the protein, which includes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, was sufficient to restrict virus release when presented by the CT/TM regions of a different type II membrane protein. To counteract tetherin restriction and remove it from the cell surface, HIV-1 Vpu required the specific sequence present in the TM domain of human tetherin. In contrast, the HIV-2 Env required only the ectodomain of the protein and was sensitive to a point mutation in this region. Strikingly, the anti-tetherin factor, Ebola virus GP, was able to overcome restriction conferred by both tetherin and a series of functional tetherin derivatives, including a wholly artificial tetherin molecule. Moreover, GP overcame restriction without significantly removing tetherin from the cell surface. These findings suggest that Ebola virus GP uses a novel mechanism to circumvent tetherin restriction.Pathogenic viruses often have evolved mechanisms to neutralize host defenses that act at the cellular level to interfere with the virus life cycle. Such cellular restriction factors have been most extensively characterized for HIV-1 (38) and include the interferon-inducible membrane protein BST-2/HM1.24/CD317/tetherin (28, 40). If unchecked, tetherin blocks the release of newly formed HIV-1 particles from cells by physically tethering them at the cell surface (7, 28, 32, 40). In addition, tetherin has been shown to act against a broad range of enveloped viral particles, including retroviruses, filoviruses, arenaviruses, and herpesviruses (17, 18, 23, 35). In turn, certain viruses that are targeted by tetherin appear to have evolved counteracting activities, and anti-tetherin factors so far identified include HIV-1 Vpu; HIV-2 Env; simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Nef, Vpu, and Env proteins; Ebola virus GP; and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) K5 (11, 16, 18, 20, 23, 28, 36, 40, 44, 45).Tetherin is a homodimeric type II integral membrane protein containing an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail (CT), a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), an ectodomain-containing predicted coiled-coil regions, two glycoslyation sites, three conserved cysteines, and a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (2, 19, 31). This unusual topology, with two independent membrane anchors, has led to the suggestion that the retention of virions at the cell surface arises from tetherin''s ability to be inserted simultaneously in both host and viral membranes (28, 32, 41) or, alternatively, that dimers or higher-order complexes of tetherin conferred by the ectodomain mediate this effect (39). Interestingly, an artificial tetherin containing the same structural features as the native protein but constructed from unrelated sequences was able to restrict both HIV-1 and Ebola virus particles (32). This suggests that the viral lipid envelope is the target of tetherin and provides an explanation for tetherin''s broad activity against diverse enveloped viruses.A fraction of tetherin is present at the plasma membrane of cells (9, 14), and it has been proposed that viral anti-tetherin factors function by removing this cell surface fraction (40). This now has been shown to occur in the presence of HIV-1 Vpu (5, 7, 15, 26, 34, 40, 44), HIV-2 Env (5, 20), SIV Env (11), SIV Nef (15), and KSHV K5 (3, 23). In addition, certain anti-tetherin factors also may promote the degradation of tetherin, as has been observed for both HIV-1 Vpu (3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 26, 27) and KSHV K5 (3, 23), although Vpu also appears able to block tetherin restriction in the absence of degradation (8), and no effects on tetherin steady-state levels have been observed in the presence of either the HIV-2 or SIVtan Env (11, 20). Simply keeping tetherin away from the cell surface, or targeting it for degradation, may not be the only mechanism used by anti-tetherin factors, since it also has been reported that Vpu does not affect the levels of surface tetherin or its total cellular levels in certain T-cell lines (27).The interactions between tetherin and viral anti-tetherin factors show evidence of species specificity, suggesting ongoing evolution between viruses and their hosts. HIV-1 Vpu is active against human and chimpanzee tetherin but not other primate tetherins (10, 25, 34, 36, 44, 45), while SIV Nef proteins are active against primate but not human tetherins (16, 36, 44, 45). This suggests that, unlike tetherin restriction, the action of the anti-tetherin factors may involve specific sequence interactions. Indeed, the TM domain has been recognized as a target for HIV-1 Vpu (10, 15, 16, 25, 34), while a single point mutation introduced into the extracellular domain of human tetherin can block its antagonism by the SIVtan Env (11).In the present study, we investigated the roles of the different domains of tetherin in both promoting virus restriction and conferring susceptibility to the anti-tetherin factors encoded by HIV-1, HIV-2, and Ebola virus. We confirmed that tetherin restriction can be conferred by proteins that retain the two distinct membrane anchors, while signals for the cellular localization of the protein reside in the CT/TM domains of the protein. We found that the Vpu protein targets the TM domain of tetherin, while the HIV-2 Env targets the ectodomain of the protein. In contrast, the Ebola virus GP appears to use a non-sequence-specific mechanism to counteract tetherin restriction, since even an artificial tetherin could be successfully overcome by GP expression. Interestingly, Ebola virus GP counteracted tetherin restriction without removing the protein from the cell surface, suggesting that it is possible to overcome this restriction by mechanisms other than blocking tetherin''s cell surface expression.     

Influence of Novel CD4 Binding-Defective HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Immunogens on Neutralizing Antibody and T-Cell Responses in Nonhuman Primates

The high-affinity in vivo interaction between soluble HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) immunogens and primate CD4 results in conformational changes that alter the immunogenicity of the gp120 subunit. Because the conserved binding site on gp120 that directly interacts with CD4 is a major vaccine target, we sought to better understand the impact of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions during vaccination. Rhesus macaques were immunized with soluble wild-type (WT) Env trimers, and two trimer immunogens rendered CD4 binding defective through distinct mechanisms. In one variant, we introduced a mutation that directly disrupts CD4 binding (368D/R). In the second variant, we introduced three mutations (423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E) that disrupt CD4 binding indirectly by altering a gp120 subdomain known as the bridging sheet, which is required for locking Env into a stable interaction with CD4. Following immunization, Env-specific binding antibody titers and frequencies of Env-specific memory B cells were comparable between the groups. However, the quality of neutralizing antibody responses induced by the variants was distinctly different. Antibodies against the coreceptor binding site were elicited by WT trimers but not the CD4 binding-defective trimers, while antibodies against the CD4 binding site were elicited by the WT and the 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E trimers but not the 368D/R trimers. Furthermore, the CD4 binding-defective trimer variants stimulated less potent neutralizing antibody activity against neutralization-sensitive viruses than WT trimers. Overall, our studies do not reveal any potential negative effects imparted by the in vivo interaction between WT Env and primate CD4 on the generation of functional T cells and antibodies in response to soluble Env vaccination.The HIV-1 Envs mediate the entry of the virus into target cells and are the only virally encoded proteins exposed on the surface of the virus. HIV-1 Env is the sole target for neutralizing antibodies (Abs) and therefore is an important component of a vaccine designed to elicit protective antibody responses (4, 20). The viral spike is a trimer comprised of three heterodimers of the exterior envelope glycoprotein, gp120, noncovalently attached to the transmembrane protein, gp41. The gp120 subunit binds the primary receptor, CD4 (7), to form or to expose the gp120 coreceptor binding elements, which interact with the viral coreceptor, primarily CCR5 (1, 9, 12, 45). The highly conserved coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) overlaps the gp120 bridging sheet and also contains both proximal and distal elements of V3 (18, 32, 43, 45).In attempts to mimic the native trimeric structure of Env present on the virus, various forms of soluble Env trimers were designed (reviewed in reference 14). One design consists of cleavage-defective trimers derived from the primary R5 isolate YU2 that possess a heterologous trimerization motif derived from T4 bacteriophage fibritin (F; YU2 gp140-F) (3, 21, 34, 40, 50, 51). We recently demonstrated that the immunization of monkeys, but not rabbits, with gp140-F trimers resulted in the generation of Abs directed against the CoRbs of gp120 capable of cross-neutralizing HIV-2 (15). CoRbs-directed Abs (also referred to as CD4-induced, or CD4i, Abs) also were elicited in rabbits transgenic for human CD4 (15). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that Env interacts with high-affinity primate CD4 in vivo, resulting in the formation, or exposure, of a highly immunogenic gp120 determinant that overlaps the CoRbs. Early in infection, the frequency of HIV-1-infected individuals with significant antibody responses against the CoRbs is high (8, 33), and CoRbs-directed antibody responses are elicited abundantly in humans inoculated with Env-based immunogens (15). Collectively, these data suggest that the recognition of the HIV-1 CoRbs by naïve B cells is greatly increased when Env is presented in complex with high-affinity primate CD4, leading to a productive Ab response against this epitope (41). With rare exceptions, the majority of CoRbs-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) do not neutralize HIV-1 primary viruses in vitro, bringing into question the utility of this region as a relevant neutralization target (23, 31, 47, 49). Strategies aimed to diminish vaccine-elicited B-cell responses to the CoRbs, and shift responses toward more accessible neutralization targets, represent one approach to improve the design of Env-based vaccine candidates. The selective manipulation of Env immunogens to decrease their CD4 binding capacity may reduce the elicitation of CoRbs-directed Abs and circumvent potential occlusion effects of the conserved CD4 binding site caused by CD4 itself.In addition to the potential effects of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions on the Ab repertoire elicited by Env-based immunogens, interactions between Env and CD4 also may have consequences on CD4⁺ T-cell responses. CD4 is an important costimulatory molecule expressed on several subsets of T cells and antigen-presenting cells, and interactions with Env were shown to alter the function of CD4-expressing T cells in a number of in vitro systems (13, 37, 44). The elimination of the Env-CD4 interaction in the context of vaccination may be beneficial to improve the elicitation of helper T-cell responses and effective neutralizing Ab responses. In vivo evaluation in subjects possessing high-affinity CD4 (i.e., rhesus macaques or humans) of CD4 binding-competent and CD4 binding-deficient Env immunogens so far have not been described.To address these questions, we designed Env trimer variants rendered CD4 binding defective through two distinct mechanisms. In the first variant, the interaction between CD4 and HIV-1 Env was directly disrupted by the introduction of a mutation (368D/R) in the CD4 binding loop of the gp120 outer domain (29). This alteration abolishes the initial binding of CD4 and most CD4 binding site (CD4bs)-directed MAbs (42) to variant forms of gp120 and would be expected to do the same in the soluble stable timer context. The aim of the second variant was to decrease the CD4 binding affinity while preserving the antigenicity of the CD4bs (48). This variant was generated in the soluble gp140-F trimers by the introduction of three point mutations, 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E, in the β20 strand region of gp120. These mutations were suggested to favor a helix rather than the β20/21 antiparallel strands visible in the gp120 structure (23, 31, 47, 49). In the monomeric context, mutations in the β20 strand region of gp120 abolish binding by CoRbs-directed Abs, presumably because the bridging sheet cannot form (48). The introduction of the 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E mutations in the trimer context therefore should disrupt the normally high-affinity gp120-CD4 interaction, while recognition by CD4bs Abs would not be affected. Indeed, a recent study provides a mechanistic basis for the impact of these mutations on CD4 binding (52). This study revealed that CD4 interacts with gp120 by a two-step binding mechanism in which the first step involves a direct, but low-affinity, CD4 interaction with the gp120 outer domain, while the second step requires a conformational change in gp120 to fully stabilize the high-affinity gp120-CD4 interaction.Here, we exploit this two-step model to generate novel CD4 binding-defective soluble trimers that, unlike the 368D/R trimers, possess a CD4bs surface that retains recognition by well-described CD4bs Abs. By immunizing rhesus macaques with the wild-type (WT) and CD4 binding-defective trimer variants, we demonstrate that similar levels of Env-specific Ab and T-cell responses were elicited in the three groups, suggesting that in vivo interactions between CD4 binding-competent (WT) Env and CD4 do not measurably affect T-cell responses against Env in this immunization regimen. However, the quality of the Ab response was markedly different between the groups. As hypothesized, CoRbs-directed Abs were elicited only in animals inoculated with WT trimers and not in those inoculated with 368D/R or 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E trimers (hereafter referred to as 368 and 423/425/431 trimers, respectively). Importantly, we show that the 423/425/431 trimers retain the capacity to elicit binding and neutralizing CD4bs-directed Abs. In conclusion, the results generated in this study suggest that CD4 engagement by the WT soluble Env trimers did not impair the overall magnitude of the elicited Env-specific antibody or T-cell responses. Furthermore, our data provide new insights into the characteristics of Env that impact immunogenicity. The data also provide a potential path forward for the design of Env immunogens that have the capacity to elicit neutralizing Abs against the conserved gp120 CD4 binding surface while eliminating both the elicitation of nonneutralizing CoRbs-directed Abs and the potential occlusion of the CD4 binding surface of gp120 by the engagement of the primary virus receptor, CD4.     

Small Molecule Targets Env for Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Protein Degradation and Inhibits Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Propagation

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is dependent on its envelope glycoprotein (Env) to bind, fuse, and subsequently infect a cell. We show here that treatment of HIV-1-infected cells with glycyl-prolyl-glycine amide (GPG-NH₂), dramatically reduced the infectivity of the released viral particles by decreasing their Env incorporation. The mechanism of GPG-NH₂ was uncovered by examining Env expression and maturation in treated cells. GPG-NH₂ treatment was found to affect Env by significantly decreasing its steady-state levels, its processing into gp120/gp41, and its mass by inducing glycan removal in a manner dependent on its native signal sequence and the proteasome. Therefore, GPG-NH₂ negatively impacts Env maturation, facilitating its targeting for endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation, where Env is deglycosylated en route to its degradation. These findings illustrate that nontoxic drugs such as GPG-NH₂, which can selectively target glycoproteins to existing cellular degradation pathways, may be useful for pathogen therapy.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) contains a number of molecular chaperones and folding factors that aid in the maturation of proteins that traverse the secretory pathway. This process is strictly monitored by the ER quality control system, which selects properly folded proteins for export to the Golgi (16) and targets misfolded proteins for destruction through the ER-associated protein degradation pathway (ERAD) (4, 28). Once an ER protein is selected as a substrate for ERAD, it is translocated from the ER lumen to the cytosol through an ER translocon. This retrotranslocation process is thought to be driven by either the cytosolic AAA-ATPase p97 (39) or the 19S proteasome cap (23). Upon entrance into the cytosol, the ERAD substrate is ubquitinated, and its glycans are removed by an N-glycanase to prepare it for proteasomal degradation (11, 28).Viral envelope glycoproteins utilize the host cell secretory pathway for their proper maturation and trafficking to the site of viral assembly. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the envelope glycoprotein (Env), which initiates HIV-1 infections by mediating attachment and fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane (17). Therefore, infectious HIV-1 particle production relies on the ability of Env to pass the rigorous ER quality control system.Env is initially synthesized as a type I membrane precursor glycoprotein termed gp160, which is cotranslationally targeted to the ER by its 30-amino-acid N-terminal signal sequence (24). Within the ER, gp160 receives ∼30 N-linked glycans and is assisted in its maturation by the chaperones BiP, calnexin, and calreticulin as it undergoes extensive disulfide bond formations (15, 21, 31). Once gp160 has reached its native state with ten disulfide bonds and its signal sequence has been cleaved posttranslationally (21, 25), it assembles into trimers (26) and is exported to the Golgi. Within the Golgi, gp160 is cleaved by cellular endoproteases, yielding the transmembrane protein gp41 and the noncovalently associated surface protein gp120 (27). Thereafter, this complex is transported to the plasma membrane, where it is incorporated into the envelope of assembling HIV-1 particles.We have previously shown that a tripeptide amide corresponding to a conserved motif of the HIV-1 Env, glycyl-prolyl-glycine amide (GPG-NH₂), suppressed the replication of all 47 HIV-1 laboratory strains and clinical isolates examined with a 50% inhibitory concentration of ∼10 μM, a concentration that is 200- to 2,000-fold less than what affected cell growth or had other toxic effects on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (35). However, this suppression was not, as we had anticipated, due to interactions of the peptide with the early events of the HIV-1 replication cycle, such as attachment or entry (36). In the present study, we demonstrate that GPG-NH₂ reduced Env incorporation into HIV-1 particles during replication by targeting Env toward the ERAD pathway. The ability of GPG-NH₂ to target Env for degradation was dependent on the presence of functional proteasomes and required the full-length Env signal sequence. These findings illustrate that small molecules may be utilized therapeutically to specifically target unwanted pathogenic proteins for degradation by the existing cellular machinery.     

Alterations in the Immunogenic Properties of Soluble Trimeric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Proteins Induced by Deletion or Heterologous Substitutions of the V1 Loop

HIV-1 gp140 envelope immunogens express conserved epitopes that are targeted by broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies, but they fail to elicit similar antibodies upon immunization. The poor immunogenicity of conserved epitopes on gp140 could be linked to the high immunogenicity of variable Env regions on such constructs. Previous studies have shown that the first hypervariable region (V1 loop) is immunogenic on soluble gp140s but elicits type-specific antibodies. To address issues related to the high immunogenicity of the V1 loop, two conceptually opposite approaches were tested. In the first approach, we eliminated the V1 loop from our gp140 construct and examined how V1 deletion altered the immunogenic properties of other Env regions. In the second approach, we took advantage of the high immunogenicity of the V1 loop and engrafted four diverse V1 loops onto a common gp140 Env “scaffold.” These four scaffolds were used as a cocktail of immunogens to elicit diverse anti-V1 antibodies, under the hypothesis that eliciting diverse anti-V1 antibodies would expand the neutralizing breadth of immune sera. Our study indicates that three of four heterologous V1 loops were immunogenic on the common Env backbone “scaffold,” but heterologous anti-V1 neutralizing responses were observed in only one case. Both types of V1 modification dampened the immunogenicity of the V3 loop, differentially altered the immunogenicity of the transmembrane gp41 subunit, and altered the relative immunogenicities of unknown Env regions, including potentially the CD4-binding site (CD4-bs) and trimer-specific targets, which elicited cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies but of limited breadth.An effective vaccine against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) will need to incorporate an envelope-derived immunogen capable of eliciting potent and broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses against diverse primary HIV-1 isolates. The target of anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), the viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein, is expressed as a single transmembrane polypeptide precursor (gp160) that is glycosylated and cleaved into an extracellular subunit (gp120) and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) during intracellular processing (10, 20, 21, 54). The functional Env form on virion surfaces is a trimer composed of three noncovalently associated gp120-gp41 heterodimers. Soluble forms of the trimeric Env have been generated by introducing stop codons immediately upstream of the transmembrane domain of gp41. These constructs are commonly referred to as gp140 proteins and have been tested extensively as immunogens to elicit anti-HIV-1 NAbs. Soluble gp140s express epitopes that are targets of NAbs, including cross-reactive NAbs such as b12, 4E10, and 2G12 (5, 17, 34, 45, 47, 49, 50, 52, 57). Immunization with gp140 immunogens nonetheless does not result in a broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody response (2, 3, 17, 18, 26, 56, 58).Epitope mapping analyses of the Abs elicited by soluble trimeric gp140 immunogens revealed that a large fraction of the gp140-induced neutralization response targets the first hypervariable region of gp120 (the V1 loop). In our hands, ∼40 to 70% of the neutralizing activity of sera from animals immunized with SF162 gp140 constructs is due to anti-V1 antibodies (17). In a study by Li et al. with YU2 gp140 (30) and a study by Wu et al. with HxB2/BaL gp145 (56), ∼10 to 80% of anti-YU2 neutralizing activity and 100% of anti-HxB2 neutralizing activity, respectively, were due to anti-V1 Abs. These anti-V1 Abs, however, are not cross-reactive. Previously, we also demonstrated that the diverse positionings of the V1 across heterologous strains limit access of broadly cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to their targets (12).Here, taking into consideration the V1 loop''s high immunogenicity, we employed two opposing approaches aimed at the elicitation of cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses to HIV-1. In the first approach, we deleted the V1 loop on our soluble trimeric gp140 construct (ΔV1SF162 gp140) and examined whether and how this modification altered the immunogenic properties of other Env regions. In the second approach, we substituted the V1 loop on our SF162 gp140 construct with the V1 loops from four heterologous HIV-1 viruses (89.6, YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) that differ in their amino acid compositions and in the number of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (PNGs). These four heterologous viruses display various neutralization phenotypes (7) and coreceptor utilization profiles (15, 35, 36, 48, 51). A total of four SF162 Env-based gp140 “scaffolds” expressing four different V1 loops were created and used as immunogens in a cocktail to test as a “proof of principle” the hypothesis that if diverse V1 loops are presented to the immune system simultaneously, the elicitation of anti-V1 NAbs with diverse specificities would broaden the overall neutralizing activity of immune sera. We also immunized animals with each of the four V1 chimeric scaffolds individually to ensure that all V1 loops were immunogenic when presented on the heterologous SF162 Env background.All immunogens (including wild-type [WT] SF162 gp140 and ΔV1SF162 gp140) elicited homologous anti-SF162 NAbs. All immunogens except the scaffold construct expressing the YU2 V1 also elicited heterologous NAbs against the sensitive lab-adapted strain HxB2. The heterologous YU2, 89.6, and HxB2 V1 loops, but not the JRFL V1 loop, were immunogenic on the background of the SF162 Env scaffold. However, only anti-V1 neutralizing activity against the HxB2 virus was observed. Although neither approach resulted in the development of broad anti-HIV-1 cross-neutralizing antibody responses, cross-neutralizing antibody responses of narrow breadth were elicited. These responses were not due to antibodies that target to variable regions of gp120 but were due to antibodies that target either epitopes of the CD4-binding site (CD4-bs) or epitopes that are not present on monomeric gp120. These observations have implications for guiding rational Env-based immunogen design and for potentially eliciting broadly cross-reactive NAb responses.     

Immunization with Wild-Type or CD4-Binding-Defective HIV-1 Env Trimers Reduces Viremia Equivalently following Heterologous Challenge with Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus

We recently reported that rhesus macaques inoculated with CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective soluble YU2-derived HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimers in adjuvant generate comparable levels of Env-specific binding antibodies (Abs) and T cell responses. We also showed that Abs directed against the Env coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) were elicited only in animals immunized with CD4-binding-competent trimers and not in animals immunized with CD4-binding-defective trimers, indicating that a direct interaction between Env and CD4 occurs in vivo. To investigate both the overall consequences of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions and the elicitation of CoRbs-directed Abs for protection against heterologous simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenge, we exposed rhesus macaques immunized with CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective trimers to the CCR5-tropic SHIV-SF162P4 challenge virus. Compared to unvaccinated controls, all vaccinated animals displayed improved control of plasma viremia, independent of the presence or absence of CoRbs-directed Abs prior to challenge. Immunization resulted in plasma responses that neutralized the heterologous SHIV challenge stock in vitro, with similar neutralizing Ab titers elicited by the CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective trimers. The neutralizing responses against both the SHIV-SF162P4 stock and a recombinant virus pseudotyped with a cloned SHIV-SF162P4-derived Env were significantly boosted by the SHIV challenge. Collectively, these results suggest that the capacity of soluble Env trimers to interact with primate CD4 in vivo and to stimulate the production of moderate titers of CoRbs-directed Abs did not influence the magnitude of the neutralizing Ab recall response after viral challenge or the subsequent control of viremia in this heterologous SHIV challenge model.The external glycoprotein gp120 and the membrane-anchored glycoprotein gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), collectively referred to as the envelope glycoproteins (Env), mediate viral entry and are the sole virally encoded targets for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Prior to binding the primary host cell receptor, CD4, the trimeric Env spike may sample multiple conformations on the surface of the virus. Which of these potential conformations display neutralizing Ab epitopes and are recognized by broadly reactive NAbs is currently unclear. A substantial conformational change occurs when the functional Env spike interacts with CD4, leading to the exposure and the formation of the bridging sheet, a highly conserved and immunogenic structure spanning the inner and outer domains of gp120 that contributes to coreceptor interaction (6, 14, 25, 30). CD4 binding is also thought to lead to the displacement of variable region 3 (V3) from a less exposed conformation in the packed functional spike to a more protruding conformation. Exposure of V3 is necessary for viral entry, as it also contributes to Env interaction with coreceptor (21). Additional or concurrent rearrangements of the functional spike structure may occur upon CD4 binding, as suggested by cryotomography (38), However, these rearrangements are less well understood due to the absence of a high-resolution structure of the static or CD4-liganded trimeric spike.In attempts to elicit broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-1 through vaccination, a range of recombinant Env variants were designed and tested (reviewed in references 15, 26, 49, and 50). The capacity of such immunogens to elicit broadly reactive NAbs is often determined using standardized in vitro neutralization assays (34). However, the ability of HIV-1 Env vaccine-elicited B cell responses to mediate actual protective and functional responses against in vivo virus challenge is evaluated less frequently, since this requires the use of nonhuman primates (NHPs) and infection with chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIVs). A series of SHIVs was developed, including those based on the HIV-1 Env glycoproteins from SF162 (40), 89.6 (54), ADA (45), BaL (48), DH12 (59), and 1157i (27). So far, few of these models, if any, fully mimic HIV-1 infection in humans. Currently, serially passaged CCR5-using SHIV-SF162 (SHIV-SF162P), which establishes transient or more prolonged viremia in macaques, represent a frequently used model to evaluate the protective effect of Env-based immunogens (2-5, 19, 20, 23, 24, 29, 53, 67). Depending on the number and nature of passages that this virus has been exposed to, the SHIV-SF162P stocks are more or less neutralization resistant (19, 62), allowing one to test the efficacy of a given vaccine candidate against a more or less rigorous form of viral challenge. Protection against mucosal SHIV-SF162P4 challenge after homologous SF162ΔV2 Env protein immunization of rhesus macaques was recently reported (2, 3). However, the nature and specificities of the vaccine-induced immune responses that mediate this effect remain incompletely defined.We recently showed that Abs against the HIV-1 gp120 coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) are elicited as a consequence of in vivo interactions between Env and primate CD4 during immunization with soluble CD4 (sCD4)-binding-competent Env trimers (14). We subsequently showed that rhesus macaques inoculated with CD4-binding competent and CD4-binding defective soluble YU2-derived gp140-F trimers in adjuvant generate comparable levels of Env-specific binding Abs and T cell responses but that CoRbs-directed Abs are elicited only in animals immunized with wild-type (wt) CD4-binding competent Env trimers (13). So far, the impact of Env-CD4 in vivo interactions during Env immunization and the role of CoRbs-directed Abs in protection against SHIV infection remain incompletely understood. A majority of the well-characterized CoRbs-directed monoclonal Abs (MAbs) lack the capacity to neutralize primary viruses in vitro (7, 31). However, it has been suggested that Abs directed against this region may contribute to the neutralizing Ab response seen in some HIV-1-infected individuals (18, 35, 58) and to the protection observed in some SHIV challenge experiments (12).The distinct difference in the capacity of the CD4-binding competent and CD4-binding defective Env trimers to elicit CoRbs-directed Abs described in our previous study presented an opportunity to evaluate the protective effect of CoRbs-directed Abs in the SHIV model. The availability of animals immunized with these Env immunogens also allowed us to ask the more general question about whether in vivo interactions between soluble Env trimers and CD4-expressing host cells would influence the outcome of heterologous SHIV-SF162P4 infection. We show here that Env trimer-immunized animals displayed improved control of SHIV-SF162P4 viremia compared to unimmunized control animals, independent of whether they were inoculated with CD4-binding-competent or CD4-binding-defective trimers. These results suggest that the capacity of soluble Env trimers to interact with CD4 in vivo and to stimulate the production of CoRbs-directed Abs did not measurably influence the protective effect of the vaccine-elicited immune responses in this SHIV challenge model.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

The Heptad Repeat 2 Domain Is a Major Determinant for Enhanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Fusion and Pathogenicity of a Highly Pathogenic HIV-1 Env

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-mediated depletion of CD4⁺ lymphocytes in an infected individual is the hallmark of progression to AIDS. However, the mechanism for this depletion remains unclear. To identify mechanisms of HIV-1-mediated CD4 T-cell death, two similar viral isolates obtained from a rapid progressor patient with significantly different pathogenic phenotypes were studied. One isolate (R3A) demonstrates enhanced pathogenesis in both in vivo models and relevant ex vivo lymphoid organ model systems compared to another isolate, R3B. The pathogenic determinants were previously mapped to the V5-gp41 envelope region, correlating functionally with enhanced fusion activity and elevated CXCR4 binding affinity. To further elucidate specific differences between R3A and R3B within the V5-gp41 domains that enhance CD4 depletion, R3A-R3B chimeras to study the V5-gp41 region were developed. Our data demonstrate that six residues in the ectodomain of R3A provide the major determinant for both enhanced Env-cell fusion and pathogenicity. Furthermore, three amino acid differences in the heptad repeat 2 (HR-2) domain of R3A determined its fusion activity and significantly elevated its pathogenic activity. The chimeric viruses with enhanced fusion activity, but not elevated CXCR4 affinity, correlated with high pathogenicity in the thymus organ. We conclude that the functional domain of a highly pathogenic HIV-1 Env is determined by mutations in the HR-2 region that contribute to enhanced fusion and CD4 T-cell depletion.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the causative agent for AIDS, which is characterized by a dramatic loss of CD4⁺ lymphocytes and impairment of the immune system against invading pathogens (13, 21, 22). Though much has been determined regarding interactions between HIV-1 virus and CD4⁺ target cells, the mechanisms by which the HIV-1 virus depletes CD4⁺ lymphocytes remain incompletely understood. Various studies have demonstrated that in an HIV-infected host, both infected and uninfected cells are prone to destruction, albeit by different pathways (15, 18, 29). Recently, our group and others have shown that while binding of CD4 and chemokine receptors contribute to syncytium formation in vitro, viral membrane fusion by the envelope glycoprotein plays an important role in depletion of both uninfected and infected cells by HIV-1 and simian-human immunodeficiency virus in vivo (1, 11, 12, 26, 29).HIV-1 entry into a cell is mediated by a multistep process that begins with high-affinity binding between viral envelope (gp120) and the cellular CD4 receptor (9, 14, 16). This binding causes a conformational change in the viral envelope, allowing for subsequent coreceptor binding (mainly CCR5 or CXCR4). Upon coreceptor binding, another conformational change is thought to take place that allows gp41 to engage the cell to form a fusion complex. Envelope proteins have been demonstrated to exist as a trimer, allowing for three gp41s to form a fusion assembly through noncovalent interactions. This fusion assembly is determined to exist in a six-helix bundle formation as the fusion event takes place, allowing for the virion to fuse to the host cell (5, 24).The envelope glycoprotein (Env) of HIV plays a significant role in viral pathogenesis, as seen in several in vitro and in vivo models of infection. The Env functions to mediate virus entry of cells and is also a major target for immune responses (31, 39). While the envelope initially forms as a precursor protein (gp160), subsequent cleavage by a cellular protease yields the surface subunit gp120 and the transmembrane gp41 although the gp120 and gp41 interact noncovalently (36). The gp120 protein is comprised of five variable (V1 to V5) and five conserved constant (C1 to C5) domains and binds CD4 and the coreceptors. The gp41 protein is comprised of an amino-terminal fusion domain and two heptad repeats (HR-1 and HR-2) in the ectodomain (extracellular domain), a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail (intracellular domain) (8, 10, 36, 37). Due to the discovery of fusion inhibitor peptides such as C34 (23, 24) and T20 (38), much is now known about the fusion complex formed by the HIV-1 fusion domain. Similar to other viral envelopes that carry a type 1 fusion complex (such as influenza and corona viruses), the ectodomain of HIV-1 Env carries two HRs that form a coiled-coiled structure. In order for HIV-cell fusion to occur, the HR-1 domains of the trimeric Env protein must interact with the cell surface. Following this initial interaction, HR-2 domains are thought to intertwine over the HR-1 coils to form a stable six-helix bundle, which represents the gp41 core structure. X-ray crystallographic studies show that the six-helix bundle core consists of the HR-1 and HR-2 peptides bound in an antiparallel manner. This structure brings the fusion peptide to the target cell membrane, allowing for the formation of a fusion pore and the entry of virions into the cell.HIV-1 Env expressed on the surface of infected cells can induce cell-cell fusion with adjacent uninfected cells to form multinucleated syncytia and single cell lysis in cell culture and apoptosis in primary cells. Various models (both ex vivo and in vivo) have been utilized to study HIV-1-induced depletion of CD4⁺ lymphocytes. Models such as SCID-human thymus-liver (SCID-hu thy/liv), tonsil histoculture, and human fetal thymus organ culture (HFTOC) have demonstrated significant use in the study of acute infection and pathogenesis in the appropriate lymphoid organ microenvironment as they retain the organ structure and do not require exogenous stimulation for productive viral infection to occur (2, 20, 28, 32). More importantly, tissue culture-adapted HIV-1 isolates such as HXB2 fail to replicate in the SCID-hu thy/liv or HFTOC models (30, 33). Organ models such as the SCID-hu thy/liv and HFTOC thus more accurately demonstrate infection, replication, and pathogenicity of primary HIV-1 strains.Here, HFTOC is used to investigate mechanisms by which an HIV-1 virus with a highly pathogenic viral Env is able to deplete CD4⁺ lymphocytes. Two viral isolates obtained from rapid progressor patient 3 of the ALIVE cohort (40) show significant sequence homology, particularly in the Env region, while they carry stark differences in pathogenic ability (26, 27). One isolate (denoted R3A) was found to demonstrate enhanced fusion in cell-cell fusion assays as well as enhanced pathogenesis in relevant ex-vivo/in vivo organ model systems compared to another isolate, R3B. To define the pathogenic determinants that differentiate R3A from R3B, this study demonstrates that the enhanced fusogenicity of R3A (governed by the ectodomain of the gp41), but not the elevated CXCR4 binding affinity, confers the pathogenic phenotype in HFTOC. We further demonstrate that three amino acid differences in the HR-2 domain allow for this enhanced fusion for R3A Env, defining a possible mechanism for a pathogenic HIV-1 envelope.     

A V3 Loop-Dependent gp120 Element Disrupted by CD4 Binding Stabilizes the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Trimer

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) entry into cells is mediated by a trimeric complex consisting of noncovalently associated gp120 (exterior) and gp41 (transmembrane) envelope glycoproteins. The binding of gp120 to receptors on the target cell alters the gp120-gp41 relationship and activates the membrane-fusing capacity of gp41. Interaction of gp120 with the primary receptor, CD4, results in the exposure of the gp120 third variable (V3) loop, which contributes to binding the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptors. We show here that insertions in the V3 stem or polar substitutions in a conserved hydrophobic patch near the V3 tip result in decreased gp120-gp41 association (in the unliganded state) and decreased chemokine receptor binding (in the CD4-bound state). Subunit association and syncytium-forming ability of the envelope glycoproteins from primary HIV-1 isolates were disrupted more by V3 changes than those of laboratory-adapted HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. Changes in the gp120 β2, β19, β20, and β21 strands, which evidence suggests are proximal to the V3 loop in unliganded gp120, also resulted in decreased gp120-gp41 association. Thus, a gp120 element composed of the V3 loop and adjacent beta strands contributes to quaternary interactions that stabilize the unliganded trimer. CD4 binding dismantles this element, altering the gp120-gp41 relationship and rendering the hydrophobic patch in the V3 tip available for chemokine receptor binding.The entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is mediated by the viral envelope glycoproteins (9, 79). The HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins are synthesized as an ∼850-amino acid precursor, which trimerizes and is posttranslationally modified by carbohydrates to create a 160-kDa glycoprotein (gp160). The gp160 envelope glycoprotein precursor is proteolytically processed in the Golgi apparatus, resulting in a gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein and a gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein (16, 17, 66, 76). In the mature HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimer, the three gp120 subunits are noncovalently bound to three membrane-anchored gp41 subunits (32).HIV-1 entry involves the binding of gp120 in a sequential fashion to CD4 and one of the chemokine receptors, CCR5 or CXCR4 (1, 8, 15, 18, 25, 36). CD4 binding triggers the formation of an activated intermediate that is competent for binding to CCR5 or CXCR4 (29, 69, 73, 78). These chemokine receptors are G protein-coupled, 7-transmembrane segment receptors with relatively short N termini. The choice of chemokine receptors is dictated primarily by the sequence of a gp120 region, the third variable (V3) loop, that exhibits variability among HIV-1 strains and becomes exposed upon CD4 binding (4, 8, 10, 33, 37, 38, 49, 59, 75). X-ray crystal structures of CD4-bound HIV-1 gp120 have revealed that the gp120 “core” consists of a gp41-interactive inner domain, a surface-exposed and heavily glycosylated outer domain, and a conformationally flexible bridging sheet (38, 43, 79). In the CD4-bound state, the V3 loop projects 30 Å from the gp120 core, toward the chemokine receptor (38). The V3 loop in these structures consists of three elements: (i) conserved antiparallel β strands that contain a disulfide bond at the base of the loop; (ii) a conformationally flexible stem; and (iii) a conserved tip (37, 38). During the virus entry process, the base of the gp120 V3 loop and elements of the bridging sheet interact with the CCR5 N terminus, which is acidic and contains sulfotyrosine residues (12-14, 23, 24). Sulfotyrosine 14 of CCR5 is thought to insert into a highly conserved pocket near the V3 base, driving further conformational rearrangements that result in the rigidification of the V3 stem (37). The conserved β-turn at the tip of the V3 loop, along with some residues in the V3 stem, is believed to bind the “body” of CCR5, i.e., the extracellular loops and membrane-spanning helices. CCR5 binding is thought to induce further conformational changes in the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, leading to the fusion of the viral and target cell membranes by the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoproteins.CCR5 binding involves two points of contact with the gp120 V3 loop: (i) the CCR5 N terminus with the V3 base and (ii) the CCR5 body with the V3 tip and distal stem (12-14, 23, 24, 37, 38). The intervening V3 stem can tolerate greater conformational and sequence variation, features that might decrease HIV-1 susceptibility to host antibodies (30). Despite amino acid variation, the length of the V3 loop is well conserved among naturally occurring group M (major group) HIV-1 strains (30, 42). This conserved length may be important for aligning the two CCR5-binding elements of the V3 loop. In addition to allowing optimal CCR5 binding, the conserved V3 length and orientation may be important for CCR5 binding to exert effects on the conformation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. We examine here the consequences of introducing extra amino acid residues into the V3 stem. The residues were introduced either into both strands of the V3 loop, attempting to preserve the symmetry of the structure, or into one of the strands, thereby kinking the loop. The effects of these changes on assembly, stability, receptor binding, and the membrane-fusing capacity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins were assessed. In addition to effects on chemokine receptor binding, unexpected disruption of gp120-gp41 association was observed. Further investigation revealed a conserved patch in the tip of the V3 loop that is important for the association of gp120 with the trimeric envelope glycoprotein complex, as well as for chemokine receptor binding. Apparently, the V3 loop and adjacent gp120 structures contribute to the stability of the trimer in the unliganded HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. These structures are known to undergo rearrangement upon CD4 binding, suggesting their involvement in receptor-induced changes in the virus entry process.