Levels of the Secreted Vibrio cholerae Attachment Factor GbpA Are Modulated by Quorum-Sensing-Induced Proteolysis

Vibrio cholerae is the etiologic agent of cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization occurs in a stepwise fashion, initiating with attachment to the small intestinal epithelium. This attachment is followed by expression of the toxin-coregulated pilus, microcolony formation, and cholera toxin (CT) production. We have recently characterized a secreted attachment factor, GlcNAc binding protein A (GbpA), which functions in attachment to environmental chitin sources as well as to intestinal substrates. Studies have been initiated to define the regulatory network involved in GbpA induction. At low cell density, GbpA was detected in the culture supernatant of all wild-type (WT) strains examined. In contrast, at high cell density, GbpA was undetectable in strains that produce HapR, the central regulator of the cell density-dependent quorum-sensing system of V. cholerae. HapR represses the expression of genes encoding regulators involved in V. cholerae virulence and activates the expression of genes encoding the secreted proteases HapA and PrtV. We show here that GbpA is degraded by HapA and PrtV in a time-dependent fashion. Consistent with this, ΔhapA ΔprtV strains attach to chitin beads more efficiently than either the WT or a ΔhapA ΔprtV ΔgbpA strain. These results suggest a model in which GbpA levels fluctuate in concert with the bacterial production of proteases in response to quorum-sensing signals. This could provide a mechanism for GbpA-mediated attachment to, and detachment from, surfaces in response to environmental cues.Vibrio cholerae has adapted to lifestyles in dual environments, allowing survival in aquatic locations, as well as the ability to colonize the epithelium of the human small intestine. This intestinal colonization by V. cholerae is a prerequisite for the disease cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization proceeds in a stepwise manner, initiating with attachment to the epithelial cell layer by multiple attachment factors (26). This stable attachment localizes the bacterium in an environment conducive for activation of subsequent virulence factors, including the toxin-coregulated pilus, a type IVb pilus that mediates cell-cell interactions and microcolony formation (27). Cholera toxin (CT) is produced and extracellularly secreted by bacteria within the microcolonies and enters into intestinal epithelial cells. CT causes the disruption of fluid and electrolyte balance and results in the voluminous rice water diarrhea characteristically observed with cholera patients.The ability of V. cholerae to bind to surfaces is crucial for the initial stages of colonization of both the aquatic and intestinal environments. Previous studies observing V. cholerae in the aquatic setting identified the ability of the bacteria to attach to zooplankton and phytoplankton, binding to surface structures that include chitin as a major component (7, 10, 11, 19, 21, 42). Chitin, a polymer consisting primarily of a β-1,4 linkage of GlcNAc monomers, is the most abundant aquatic carbon source and, when presented on the surfaces of zooplankton, aquatic exoskeletons, algae, and plants, provides a substrate for V. cholerae surface binding (8, 19-22). V. cholerae is able to break down chitin into carbon to use as a nutrient source via degradation by secreted chitinases (12). We have described a protein, GbpA (GlcNAc binding protein A), which facilitates the binding of V. cholerae to chitin, specifically to the chitin monomer GlcNAc, a sugar residue that is also found on the surface of epithelial cells (3, 16, 26). GbpA mediates binding to chitin, GlcNAc, and exoskeletons of Daphnia magna, as well as participates in effective intestinal colonization within the infant mouse model of cholera (26). GbpA is a secreted protein that exits the cell via the type 2 secretion system by which it mediates attachment by a yet uncharacterized mechanism (26). Previous studies examining the role of GbpA in binding to surfaces have been conducted utilizing various wild-type (WT) strains of V. cholerae, specifically O395 (26) and N16961 (33). These strains both are of the O1 serogroup but are differentially classified as classical (43) and El Tor biotypes (18), respectively. The classical biotype was responsible for the first six pandemics of cholera, whereas El Tor is the cause of the current pandemic (39).Quorum sensing regulates multiple bacterial processes, including virulence, formation of biofilms, and bioluminescence (25, 35, 36). In contrast to many other bacterial quorum-sensing systems, virulence gene expression and biofilm formation in V. cholerae is expressed under conditions of low cell density and repressed at high cell density (17, 35, 48). HapR, a member of the TetR family of regulatory proteins, is a central regulator on which the three parallel inputs of the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system converge (30, 35). During low-cell-density conditions, characteristic of growth within the aquatic environment or stages of early intestinal colonization, the quorum-sensing system is not engaged. Under conditions of high cell density, bacterial numbers and secreted autoinducer molecules are increased to a level that triggers the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system.HapR regulates gene function in two ways, serving as both an activator and repressor. At high cell density, HapR functions in the capacity of a repressor of the toxin-coregulated pilus and CT virulence cascade (29, 31) as well as a repressor of vps gene expression (17), preventing biofilm formation. In addition to repressing gene expression, at high cell density HapR activates the expression of genes encoding extracellularly secreted proteases HapA and PrtV (14, 17, 23, 45-47). HapA, also referred to as hemagglutinin/protease (HA/P), was first reported as a mucinase by Burnet (6) and later characterized as a zinc- and calcium-dependent metalloprotease (4). Extracellularly secreted via the V. cholerae type 2 secretion pathway (40), HA/P has been demonstrated to cleave fibronectin, lactoferrin, and mucin (15), as well as to participate in the activation of the CT A subunit (5). Further studies have led to the suggestion that HA/P is a detachase, critical for the release of V. cholerae from the surface of intestinal cells (2, 14, 38). PrtV is a second protease encoded by a gene that is activated by HapR (47). It has been demonstrated to be essential for both V. cholerae killing of Caenorhabditis elegans, as well as protecting V. cholerae from predator grazing by various flagellates (32, 45).The data presented here indicate that HapA and PrtV participate in the targeted degradation of the attachment factor GbpA. We demonstrate that GbpA is present during the logarithmic phase of growth and conditions of low cell density but that it is not present in the supernatant of high-cell-density cultures of strains that express functional HapR. Further studies revealed that during stages of high cell density, proteases HapA and PrtV, encoded by HapR-activated genes, are responsible for GbpA degradation in the culture supernatant. These findings suggest that the attachment factor GbpA is potentially a ligand targeted for protease degradation during the epithelial detachment process. This process could aid in the release of V. cholerae back into the aquatic environment following late stages of intestinal colonization.     

Identification and Characterization of a Phosphodiesterase That Inversely Regulates Motility and Biofilm Formation in Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae switches between free-living motile and surface-attached sessile lifestyles. Cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) is a signaling molecule controlling such lifestyle changes. C-di-GMP is synthesized by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) that contain a GGDEF domain and is degraded by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that contain an EAL or HD-GYP domain. We constructed in-frame deletions of all V. cholerae genes encoding proteins with GGDEF and/or EAL domains and screened mutants for altered motility phenotypes. Of 52 mutants tested, four mutants exhibited an increase in motility, while three mutants exhibited a decrease in motility. We further characterized one mutant lacking VC0137 (cdgJ), which encodes an EAL domain protein. Cellular c-di-GMP quantifications and in vitro enzymatic activity assays revealed that CdgJ functions as a PDE. The cdgJ mutant had reduced motility and exhibited a small decrease in flaA expression; however, it was able to produce a flagellum. This mutant had enhanced biofilm formation and vps gene expression compared to that of the wild type, indicating that CdgJ inversely regulates motility and biofilm formation. Genetic interaction analysis revealed that at least four DGCs, together with CdgJ, control motility in V. cholerae.Cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) is a ubiquitous second messenger in bacteria. It is synthesized by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) that contain a GGDEF domain and is degraded by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that contain an EAL or HD-GYP domain (46, 48, 50). The receptors of c-di-GMP, which can be proteins or RNAs (riboswitches), bind to c-di-GMP and subsequently transmit the signal to downstream targets (22). C-di-GMP signaling is predicted to occur via a common or localized c-di-GMP pool(s) through so-called c-di-GMP signaling modules harboring DGCs and PDEs, receptors, and targets that affect cellular function (22).C-di-GMP controls various cellular functions, including the transition between a planktonic lifestyle and biofilm lifestyle. In general, high concentrations of c-di-GMP promote the expression of adhesive matrix components and result in biofilm formation, while low concentrations of c-di-GMP result in altered motility upon changes in flagellar or pili function and/or production (reviewed in reference 25). C-di-GMP inversely regulates motility and biofilm formation by implementing control at different levels through gene expression or through posttranslational mechanisms (reviewed in reference 25).Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of the disease cholera, uses c-di-GMP signaling to undergo a motile-to-sessile lifestyle switch that is important for both environmental and in vivo stages of the V. cholerae life cycle. The survival of the pathogen in both natural aquatic environments and during infection depends on the appropriate regulation of motility, surface attachment, and colonization factors (26). The V. cholerae genome encodes a total of 62 putative c-di-GMP metabolic enzymes: 31 with a GGDEF domain, 12 with an EAL domain, 10 with both GGDEF and EAL domains, and 9 with an HD-GYP domain (21). V. cholerae contains a few known or predicted c-di-GMP receptors: two riboswitches (53), five PilZ domain proteins (43), VpsT (31), and CdgG (6). C-di-GMP regulates virulence, motility, biofilm formation, and the smooth-to-rugose phase variation in V. cholerae (6, 8, 9, 12, 30, 33, 43, 45, 54, 56, 57). However, particular sets of proteins have not been matched to discrete cellular processes.Some of the DGCs and PDEs involved in regulating motility in V. cholerae have been identified: rocS and cdgG mutants exhibit a decrease in motility (45), while cdgD and cdgH mutants exhibit an increase in motility (6). In addition, VieA (PDE) positively regulates motility in the V. cholerae classical biotype but not in the El Tor biotype (7). AcgA (PDE) positively regulates motility at low concentrations of inorganic phosphate (42). In this study, we investigated the role of each putative gene encoding DGCs and PDEs in controlling cell motility. In addition to the already-characterized proteins CdgD, CdgH, and RocS, we identified two putative DGCs (CdgK and CdgL) that negatively control motility and a putative PDE (CdgJ) that positively controls motility. We further characterized CdgJ and showed that it functions as a PDE and inversely regulates motility and biofilm formation. Genetic interaction studies revealed that DGCs CdgD, CdgH, CdgL, and CdgK and PDE CdgJ form a c-di-GMP signaling network to control motility in V. cholerae.     

An IcmF Family Protein,ImpLM, Is an Integral Inner Membrane Protein Interacting with ImpKL,and Its Walker A Motif Is Required for Type VI Secretion System-Mediated Hcp Secretion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

An intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) family protein is a conserved component of a newly identified type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoded in many animal and plant-associated Proteobacteria. We have previously identified ImpL_M, an IcmF family protein that is required for the secretion of the T6SS substrate hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) from the plant-pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In this study, we characterized the topology of ImpL_M and the importance of its nucleotide-binding Walker A motif involved in Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens. A combination of β-lactamase-green fluorescent protein fusion and biochemical fractionation analyses revealed that ImpL_M is an integral polytopic inner membrane protein comprising three transmembrane domains bordered by an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal domain exposed to the periplasm. impL_M mutants with substitutions or deletions in the Walker A motif failed to complement the impL_M deletion mutant for Hcp secretion, which provided evidence that ImpL_M may bind and/or hydrolyze nucleoside triphosphates to mediate T6SS machine assembly and/or substrate secretion. Protein-protein interaction and protein stability analyses indicated that there is a physical interaction between ImpL_M and another essential T6SS component, ImpK_L. Topology and biochemical fractionation analyses suggested that ImpK_L is an integral bitopic inner membrane protein with an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal OmpA-like domain exposed to the periplasm. Further comprehensive yeast two-hybrid assays dissecting ImpL_M-ImpK_L interaction domains suggested that ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L via the N-terminal cytoplasmic domains of the proteins. In conclusion, ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L, and its Walker A motif is required for its function in mediation of Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens.Many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria employ protein secretion systems formed by macromolecular complexes to deliver proteins or protein-DNA complexes across the bacterial membrane. In addition to the general secretory (Sec) pathway (18, 52) and twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (7, 34), which transport proteins across the inner membrane into the periplasm, at least six distinct protein secretion systems occur in gram-negative bacteria (28, 46, 66). These systems are able to secrete proteins from the cytoplasm or periplasm to the external environment or the host cell and include the well-documented type I to type V secretion systems (T1SS to T5SS) (10, 15, 23, 26, 30) and a recently discovered type VI secretion system (T6SS) (4, 8, 22, 41, 48, 49). These systems use ATPase or a proton motive force to energize assembly of the protein secretion machinery and/or substrate translocation (2, 6, 41, 44, 60).Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogenic gram-negative bacterium that causes crown gall disease in a wide range of plants. Using an archetypal T4SS (9), A. tumefaciens translocates oncogenic transferred DNA and effector proteins to the host and ultimately integrates transferred DNA into the host genome. Because of its unique interkingdom DNA transfer, this bacterium has been extensively studied and used to transform foreign DNA into plants and fungi (11, 24, 40, 67). In addition to the T4SS, A. tumefaciens encodes several other secretion systems, including the Sec pathway, the Tat pathway, T1SS, T5SS, and the recently identified T6SS (72). T6SS is highly conserved and widely distributed in animal- and plant-associated Proteobacteria and plays an important role in the virulence of several human and animal pathogens (14, 19, 41, 48, 56, 63, 74). However, T6SS seems to play only a minor role or even a negative role in infection or virulence of the plant-associated pathogens or symbionts studied to date (5, 37-39, 72).T6SS was initially designated IAHP (IcmF-associated homologous protein) clusters (13). Before T6SS was documented by Pukatzki et al. in Vibrio cholerae (48), mutations in this gene cluster in the plant symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum (5) and the fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda (51) caused defects in protein secretion. In V. cholerae, T6SS was responsible for the loss of cytotoxicity for amoebae and for secretion of two proteins lacking a signal peptide, hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) and valine-glycine repeat protein (VgrG). Secretion of Hcp is the hallmark of T6SS. Interestingly, mutation of hcp blocks the secretion of VgrG proteins (VgrG-1, VgrG-2, and VgrG-3), and, conversely, vgrG-1 and vgrG-2 are both required for secretion of the Hcp and VgrG proteins from V. cholerae (47, 48). Similarly, a requirement of Hcp for VgrG secretion and a requirement of VgrG for Hcp secretion have also been shown for E. tarda (74). Because Hcp forms a hexameric ring (41) stacked in a tube-like structure in vitro (3, 35) and VgrG has a predicted trimeric phage tail spike-like structure similar to that of the T4 phage gp5-gp27 complex (47), Hcp and VgrG have been postulated to form an extracellular translocon. This model is further supported by two recent crystallography studies showing that Hcp, VgrG, and a T4 phage gp25-like protein resembled membrane penetration tails of bacteriophages (35, 45).Little is known about the topology and structure of T6SS machinery subunits and the distinction between genes encoding machinery subunits and genes encoding regulatory proteins. Posttranslational regulation via the phosphorylation of Fha1 by a serine-threonine kinase (PpkA) is required for Hcp secretion from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (42). Genetic evidence for P. aeruginosa suggested that the T6SS may utilize a ClpV-like AAA⁺ ATPase to provide the energy for machinery assembly or substrate translocation (41). A recent study of V. cholerae suggested that ClpV ATPase activity is responsible for remodeling the VipA/VipB tubules which are crucial for type VI substrate secretion (6). An outer membrane lipoprotein, SciN, is an essential T6SS component for mediating Hcp secretion from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (1). A systematic study of the T6SS machinery in E. tarda revealed that 13 of 16 genes in the evp gene cluster are essential for secretion of T6S substrates (74), which suggests the core components of the T6SS. Interestingly, most of the core components conserved in T6SS are predicted soluble proteins without recognizable signal peptide and transmembrane (TM) domains.The intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) and H (IcmH) proteins are among the few core components with obvious TM domains (8). In Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm T4SSb, IcmF and IcmH are both membrane localized and partially required for L. pneumophila replication in macrophages (58, 70, 75). IcmF and IcmH are thought to interact with each other in stabilizing the T4SS complex in L. pneumophila (58). In T6SS, IcmF is one of the essential components required for secretion of Hcp from several animal pathogens, including V. cholerae (48), Aeromonas hydrophila (63), E. tarda (74), and P. aeruginosa (41), as well as the plant pathogens A. tumefaciens (72) and Pectobacterium atrosepticum (39). In E. tarda, IcmF (EvpO) interacted with IcmH (EvpN), EvpL, and EvpA in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and its putative nucleotide-binding site (Walker A motif) was not essential for secretion of T6SS substrates (74).In this study, we characterized the topology and interactions of the IcmF and IcmH family proteins ImpL_M and ImpK_L, which are two essential components of the T6SS of A. tumefaciens. We adapted the nomenclature proposed by Cascales (8), using the annotated gene designation followed by the letter indicated by Shalom et al. (59). Our data indicate that ImpL_M and ImpK_L are both integral inner membrane proteins and interact with each other via their N-terminal domains residing in the cytoplasm. We also provide genetic evidence showing that ImpL_M may function as a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-binding protein or nucleoside triphosphatase to mediate T6S machinery assembly and/or substrate secretion.     

Contribution of Lipoproteins and Lipoprotein Processing to Endocarditis Virulence in Streptococcus sanguinis

Streptococcus sanguinis is an important cause of infective endocarditis. Previous studies have identified lipoproteins as virulence determinants in other streptococcal species. Using a bioinformatic approach, we identified 52 putative lipoprotein genes in S. sanguinis strain SK36 as well as genes encoding the lipoprotein-processing enzymes prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase (lgt) and signal peptidase II (lspA). We employed a directed signature-tagged mutagenesis approach to systematically disrupt these genes and screen each mutant for the loss of virulence in an animal model of endocarditis. All mutants were viable. In competitive index assays, mutation of a putative phosphate transporter reduced in vivo competitiveness by 14-fold but also reduced in vitro viability by more than 20-fold. Mutations in lgt, lspA, or an uncharacterized lipoprotein gene reduced competitiveness by two- to threefold in the animal model and in broth culture. Mutation of ssaB, encoding a putative metal transporter, produced a similar effect in culture but reduced in vivo competiveness by >1,000-fold. [³H]palmitate labeling and Western blot analysis confirmed that the lgt mutant failed to acylate lipoproteins, that the lspA mutant had a general defect in lipoprotein cleavage, and that SsaB was processed differently in both mutants. These results indicate that the loss of a single lipoprotein, SsaB, dramatically reduces endocarditis virulence, whereas the loss of most other lipoproteins or of normal lipoprotein processing has no more than a minor effect on virulence.Streptococcus sanguinis is a member of the viridans group of streptococci and is a primary colonizer of teeth (8). The viridans species and, in particular, S. sanguinis (15, 18) are a leading cause of infective endocarditis, a serious infection of the valves or lining of the heart (48). Damage to the heart resulting from rheumatic fever or certain congenital heart defects dramatically increases the risk of developing endocarditis (48, 71). The damage is thought to result in the formation of sterile cardiac “vegetations” composed of platelets and fibrin (48) that can be colonized by certain bacteria during periods of bacteremia. This view is supported by animal studies in which formation of sterile vegetation by cardiac catheterization is required for the efficient establishment of streptococcal endocarditis (17). Prevention of infective endocarditis currently relies upon prophylactic administration of antibiotics prior to dental or other surgical procedures that are likely to produce bacteremia. The growing realization that oral bacteria such as S. sanguinis can enter the bloodstream through routine daily activities such as eating has led the American Heart Association (71) and others (57) to question the value of using antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures. Clearly, a better understanding of the bacterial virulence factors that contribute to endocarditis could lead to better preventive measures, such as a vaccine that could potentially afford continuous protection to high-risk patients (71).In a previous study, we used the signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM) technique to search for endocarditis virulence factors of S. sanguinis in a rabbit model (53). This study identified a number of housekeeping enzymes that contribute to endocarditis. Because these proteins are not likely to be surface localized, they hold little promise as vaccine candidates. One class of streptococcal surface proteins that is rich in both virulence factors (4, 7, 25, 33, 38, 60) and promising vaccine candidates (6, 39, 42, 51, 70) is the lipoproteins. Lipoprotein activities that have been suggested to contribute to streptococcal virulence include adhesion (4, 7, 63), posttranslational modification (25, 29, 51), and ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-mediated transport (33, 52, 60). In the last instance, lipoproteins anchored to the cell membrane by their lipid tails appear to serve the same transport function as the periplasmic substrate-binding proteins of gram-negative bacteria (66). STM studies performed with Streptococcus pneumoniae (26, 41, 55) and Streptococcus agalactiae (34) have identified multiple lipoprotein mutants among collections of reduced virulence mutants. In an attempt to determine the cumulative contribution of streptococcal lipoproteins to virulence, some investigators have created mutations in the lgt or lspA genes, encoding lipoprotein-processing enzymes (12, 25, 27, 36). The lgt gene encodes prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase, which catalyzes the transfer of a diacylglycerol lipid unit to a cysteine in the conserved N-terminal “lipobox” of lipoproteins, while lspA encodes the signal peptidase II enzyme that cleaves the signal peptide of the prolipoprotein just prior to the conserved cysteine (59, 65). While mutation of these genes has been shown to be lethal in gram-negative bacteria (21, 73), many gram-positive bacterial species have been shown to tolerate such mutations, often with only minor effects on growth (3, 12, 13, 25, 27, 36, 54). Some of these studies indicated a deleterious effect on the virulence of the lgt (25, 54) or lspA (36) mutation, but others found no effect (12) or an enhancement of virulence (27). It is clear from these and other studies (3, 13) that neither the loss of acylation due to lgt inactivation nor the loss of signal peptidase II-mediated cleavage completely eliminates lipoprotein function, necessitating alternative approaches for assessing the global contribution of lipoproteins to virulence.We have used bioinformatic approaches to identify every putative lipoprotein encoded by S. sanguinis strain SK36. To determine the contribution of these lipoproteins to the endocarditis virulence of S. sanguinis, we have systematically mutagenized each of these genes, as well as the lgt and lspA genes, and evaluated these mutants for virulence by using STM in an animal model. Selected mutants were further examined for virulence in competitive index (CI) assays. A strain with a disrupted ssaB gene, which encodes a putative metal transport protein, was found to exhibit a profound defect in virulence that was far greater than that of any other strain tested, including the lgt or lspA mutant.     

Thioredoxin 1 Participates in the Activity of the Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Pathogenicity Island 2 Type III Secretion System

The facultative intracellular pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium relies on its Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 (SPI2) type III secretion system (T3SS) for intracellular replication and virulence. We report that the oxidoreductase thioredoxin 1 (TrxA) and SPI2 are coinduced for expression under in vitro conditions that mimic an intravacuolar environment, that TrxA is needed for proper SPI2 activity under these conditions, and that TrxA is indispensable for SPI2 activity in both phagocytic and epithelial cells. Infection experiments in mice demonstrated that SPI2 strongly contributed to virulence in a TrxA-proficient background whereas SPI2 did not affect virulence in a trxA mutant. Complementation analyses using wild-type trxA or a genetically engineered trxA coding for noncatalytic TrxA showed that the catalytic activity of TrxA is essential for SPI2 activity in phagocytic cells whereas a noncatalytic variant of TrxA partially sustained SPI2 activity in epithelial cells and virulence in mice. These results show that TrxA is needed for the intracellular induction of SPI2 and provide new insights into the functional integration between catalytic and noncatalytic activities of TrxA and a bacterial T3SS in different settings of intracellular infections.In Escherichia coli, thioredoxin 1 (TrxA, encoded by trxA) is an evolutionary conserved 11-kDa cytosolic highly potent reductase that supports the activities of various oxidoreductases and ribonucleotide reductases (1, 29) and interacts with a number of additional cytoplasmic proteins through the formation of temporary covalent intermolecular disulphide bonds (32). Consequently, as trxA mutants of E. coli (51), Helicobacter pylori (13), and Rhodobacter sphaeroides (34) show increased sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, TrxA has been defined as a significant oxidoprotectant. In addition, TrxA possess a protein chaperone function that is disconnected from cysteine interactions (30, 32).Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is closely related to E. coli. During divergent evolution, the Salmonella genome acquired a number of virulence-associated genes (20). Many of these genes are clustered on genetic regions termed Salmonella pathogenicity islands (or SPIs). Of these, SPI1 and SPI2 code for separate type III secretion systems (T3SSs). T3SSs are supramolecular virulence-associated machineries that, in several pathogenic gram-negative bacterial species, enable injection of effector proteins from the bacteria into host cells (22, 57). The effector proteins, in turn, manipulate intrinsic host cell functions to facilitate the infection.The SPI1 T3SS of S. serovar Typhimurium is activated for expression in the intestine in response to increased osmolarity and decreased oxygen tension (22, 57). SPI1 effector proteins are primarily secreted into cells that constitute the epithelial layer and interfere with host cell Cdc42 and Rac-1 signaling and actin polymerization. This enables the bacteria to orchestrate their own actin-dependent uptake into nonphagocytic cells (57). SPI1 effector proteins also induce inflammatory signaling and release of interleukin-1β from infected cells (25, 26).Subsequent systemic progression of S. serovar Typhimurium from the intestinal tissue relies heavily on an ability to survive and replicate in phagocytic cells (18, 46, 53, 54). S. serovar Typhimurium uses an additional set of effector proteins secreted by the SPI2 T3SS for replication inside host cells and for coping with phagocyte innate responses to the infection (10, 11, 54). The functions of SPI2 effectors include diversion of vesicular trafficking, induction of apoptotic responses, and manipulation of ubiquitination of host proteins (28, 40, 45, 53). Hence, SPI2 effector proteins create a vacuolar environment that sustains intracellular replication of S. serovar Typhimurium (28).In addition to pathogenicity islands, the in vivo fitness of Salmonella spp. relies on selected functions shared with other enterobacteria. Thus, many virulence genes are integrated into “housekeeping” gene regulatory networks, coded for by a core genome, which steer bacterial stress responses (12, 17, 27, 55). Selected anabolic pathways also contribute to virulence of S. serovar Typhimurium (18, 27), evidently by providing biochemical building blocks for bacterial replication (36).In S. serovar Typhimurium, TrxA is a housekeeping protein that strongly contributes to virulence in cell culture and mouse infection models (8). However, the mechanism by which TrxA activity adds to virulence has not been defined. Here we show that the contribution of TrxA to virulence of S. serovar Typhimurium associates with its functional integration with the SPI2 T3SS under conditions that prevail in the intracellular vacuolar compartment of the host cell. These findings ascribe a novel role to TrxA in bridging environmental adaptations with virulence gene expression and illuminate a new aspect of the interaction between evolutionary conserved and horizontally acquired gene functions in bacteria.     

Docking and Assembly of the Type II Secretion Complex of Vibrio cholerae

Secretion of cholera toxin and other virulence factors from Vibrio cholerae is mediated by the type II secretion (T2S) apparatus, a multiprotein complex composed of both inner and outer membrane proteins. To better understand the mechanism by which the T2S complex coordinates translocation of its substrates, we are examining the protein-protein interactions of its components, encoded by the extracellular protein secretion (eps) genes. In this study, we took a cell biological approach, observing the dynamics of fluorescently tagged EpsC and EpsM proteins in vivo. We report that the level and context of fluorescent protein fusion expression can have a bold effect on subcellular location and that chromosomal, intraoperon expression conditions are optimal for determining the intracellular locations of fusion proteins. Fluorescently tagged, chromosomally expressed EpsC and EpsM form discrete foci along the lengths of the cells, different from the polar localization for green fluorescent protein (GFP)-EpsM previously described, as the fusions are balanced with all their interacting partner proteins within the T2S complex. Additionally, we observed that fluorescent foci in both chromosomal GFP-EpsC- and GFP-EpsM-expressing strains disperse upon deletion of epsD, suggesting that EpsD is critical to the localization of EpsC and EpsM and perhaps their assembly into the T2S complex.The type II secretion (T2S) pathway is widely used by pathogenic gram-negative bacteria for delivery of virulence factors into the extracellular milieu (11, 17, 46). Proteins destined for release through this pathway are first translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane via the Sec (24, 42) or Tat (59) machinery. Following folding and assembly in the periplasm, the proteins are transported across the outer membrane via the T2S machinery, a complex composed of 12 to 16 different gene products, depending on the species. In Vibrio cholerae, the elements of the T2S apparatus are encoded by the extracellular protein secretion (eps) genes, epsC through epsN and pilD (vcpD) (18, 31, 39, 49, 50). Together these proteins coordinate the outer membrane translocation of the major virulence factor, cholera toxin, as well as chitinase, lipase, hemagglutinin/protease, and other proteases (12, 27, 49). Our studies are focused on better understanding how the T2S complex assembles in the cell envelope of V. cholerae to begin to elucidate the mechanism by which extracellular secretion is accomplished.The T2S apparatus is modeled as an envelope-spanning complex with subcomplexes in the inner and outer membranes (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The precise stoichiometry and juxtaposition of the Eps proteins are not known, but accumulating biochemical, genetic, and molecular studies continue to refine our understanding of complex assembly and function (for a review, see reference 25). A trimolecular complex consisting of cytoplasmic protein EpsE and inner membrane proteins EpsL and EpsM has been identified. EpsL and EpsM have been shown to coimmunoprecipitate and participate in mutual stabilization interactions in vivo by protecting each other from proteolysis (34, 41, 43, 48). Homologs of inner membrane protein EpsC have been implicated in interactions with the aforementioned inner membrane subcomplex (20, 29, 57), as well as homologs of outer membrane protein EpsD, which form oligomeric rings through which the secreted substrates, it is hypothesized, exit the cell (1, 10, 36, 38). More specifically, EpsC homologs in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella oxytoca are sensitive to proteolysis or unable to oligomerize in the absence of EpsD homologs (2, 40); however, direct interactions between these two proteins in their full-length forms have not been shown by coimmunoprecipitation or copurification. Although yeast two-hybrid analysis of the periplasmic domains of the Erwinia chrysanthemi EpsC and EpsD homologs also did not reveal interaction (15), recently it was shown that periplasmic subdomains of EpsC and EpsD homologs of Vibrio vulnificus copurified (28). It seems likely that EpsC, having interactions with both inner and outer membrane subcomplexes, plays a crucial role in complex function by connecting the inner membrane components to the outer membrane EpsD pore. Furthermore, it has been speculated that EpsC homologs impart specificity to the various T2S systems by directly interacting with proteins to be secreted (3).We have taken a cell biology approach to characterizing Eps protein interactions, observing the dynamics of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged components of the Eps complex in live cells by fluorescence microscopy. This method permits study of Eps protein assembly in the context of the complete apparatus, situated in both membranes, without the disruptive procedures required for many in vitro molecular and biochemical analyses of protein-protein interactions. Here we present data illustrating the importance of expressing GFP fusions for localization studies with all other interacting components, preserving wild-type stoichiometry and expression levels. In particular, we note that GFP-EpsM does not appear to be focused at the polar membrane as previously described (53), when expressed in balance with its interacting proteins. Chromosomal replacement of epsM and epsC with gfp-tagged versions instead reveals a more distributed pattern, with punctate fluorescent foci along the full length of the cell. We have exploited these chromosomal gfp-eps strains to further dissect the interactions and requirements for localization of EpsC and EpsM by systematically deleting other eps genes in the operon.     

Relatedness of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 Isolates from Patients and Their Household Contacts,Determined by Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis

The genetic relatedness of Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from 100 patients and 146 of their household contacts in Dhaka, Bangladesh, between 2002 and 2005 was assessed by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. Isolate genotypes were analyzed at five loci containing tandem repeats. Across the population, as well as within households, isolates with identical genotypes were clustered in time. Isolates from individuals within the same household were more likely to have similar or identical genotypes than were isolates from different households, but even within a household, isolates from different individuals often had different genotypes. When household contacts were sampled regularly for 3 weeks after the illness of the household index patient, isolates with genotypes related to the index patient appeared in contacts, on average, ∼3 days after the index patient, while isolates with unrelated genotypes appeared in contacts ∼6 days after. Limited data revealed that multiple isolates from the same individual collected within days of each other or even from a single stool sample may have identical, similar, or unrelated genotypes as well. Our results demonstrate that genetically related V. cholerae strains cluster in local outbreaks but also suggest that multiple distinct strains of V. cholerae O1 may circulate simultaneously within a household.Vibrio cholerae is the etiologic agent of cholera, a secretory diarrheal disease with a high mortality rate in humans if untreated (25). Serogroups of V. cholerae, a motile, Gram-negative, curved rod, can be defined serologically by the O side chain of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) component of the outer membrane (9). V. cholerae is found in a variety of forms in aquatic ecosystems (41, 42), and more than 200 different serogroups have been isolated, mostly from environmental sources (45). However, the vast majority of V. cholerae strains that cause the clinical disease cholera belong to serogroup O1 or O139 (37, 42). V. cholerae O1, the historical agent of epidemic and pandemic cholera and the current leading cause of cholera both globally and in Bangladesh (42), is classified into two major biotypes, classical and El Tor (44), and two major serotypes, Ogawa and Inaba (48). The current global pandemic is caused by V. cholerae O1 El Tor. A second pathogenic serogroup, O139, emerged in the Bengal region in 1992 by horizontal transfer of new LPS biosynthesis-encoding genes into the El Tor biotype (1, 4). This new serogroup continues to cocirculate with El Tor V. cholerae O1 serotypes Ogawa and Inaba as a cause of disease in humans, although it accounts for a smaller proportion of all cholera now than in its first years of circulation (16, 20). Recently, comparative genomics has revealed an extensive amount of lateral gene transfer between strains, suggesting that genomic classification may be an alternative to serogrouping for classifying pathogenic V. cholerae strains (11).Toxigenic V. cholerae may be present in environmental sources in regions of endemicity and emerge, often seasonally, to cause cholera in humans (12, 18). Once an outbreak has begun, organisms from one infected individual are more infectious for the next individual, a property termed hyperinfectivity, and these forms may be able to pass directly from human to human through fecal-oral contamination (35). However, because vibrio organisms are difficult to isolate from implicated environmental or domestic water sources (28, 29), little is known about the diversity of V. cholerae in inocula that cause human infection.Established laboratory methods for differentiating V. cholerae strains, apart from serogrouping and serotyping, include rRNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (ribotyping), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). These methods, however, have a limited capacity to differentiate between pathogenic V. cholerae strains, as clinical isolates are relatively genetically monomorphic. For instance, V. cholerae O1 comprises approximately 30 ribotypes (39); however, only a few ribotypes are common in clinical isolates, ribotypes evolve slowly, and all isolates of a given pathogenic V. cholerae serotype in a local area over a period of multiple years often belong to a single ribotype (8, 14, 17). In a broad sampling of 154 V. cholerae isolates from Bangladesh and worldwide over several decades, only 15 ribotypes were identified, and of these, many were found in nonpathogenic environmental isolates only; only five ribotypes were associated with the V. cholerae O1 El Tor biotype that currently predominates as the cause of clinical disease, while pathogenic isolates of serogroup O139 were indistinguishable from each other by ribotype (19).PFGE, in which restriction endonuclease digestion of genomic DNA generates mutation-sensitive banding patterns, is often more sensitive than ribotyping in detecting strain variation (7, 34, 51) and detects extensive genetic variation within nonpathogenic V. cholerae serogroups (3, 46). However, PFGE types change slowly and are useful primarily for distinguishing between strains in different pandemics or between different continental branches of those pandemics. In an analysis of 180 mostly western-hemisphere isolates (7), PFGE differences had developed from a prior pandemic strain over the 30 years since its arrival in Latin America, but a new strain that had been causing disease for 2 years still had only a single PFGE type across the 64 isolates analyzed. Similarly, in a Japanese study (2), although 19 PFGE types were identified among O1 isolates, the majority of the domestic isolates, along with several imported isolates, belonged to a single PFGE type.Further differentiation between V. cholerae isolates is achievable by MLST, which characterizes isolates by internal DNA sequences in selected housekeeping genes (32). Nevertheless, epidemic strains also cluster tightly in this typing scheme (5, 32) and the method has been useful primarily for determining relationships between nontoxigenic strains (36) or for linking regional outbreaks (which typically appear monoclonal by these methods) with the pandemic strain responsible (5, 33).Although these methods have distinguished major pandemic clones from other nonpathogenic human and environmental isolates of V. cholerae, the near clonality of pathogenic O1 and O139 strains means that established methods may not provide sufficiently robust differentiation of these genetically similar pathogenic strains to answer important epidemiological questions. Therefore, there is a need for other methods that can distinguish among clinical O1 and O139 isolates and track the epidemiology of outbreaks in a restricted geographic area on a shorter time scale.Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) is one method that may be useful for differentiating between pathogenic V. cholerae O1 and O139 strains that would be indistinguishable by other techniques (15). This method examines short repeating DNA segments at various locations in the genome that can vary in number at each location and uses the number of repeats at each varying locus as a fingerprint to distinguish between isolates.Escherichia coli is the paradigm organism for demonstrating the value of the MLVA method. Noller et al. (38) showed that E. coli O157 isolates that were indistinguishable by MLST could be distinguished to some extent by PFGE but that MLVA distinguished between isolates that had the same PFGE type and did so in a manner consistent with the known epidemiology of the isolates (38a). In addition, machine-scored VNTR assays have been demonstrated to be robust and portable and to discriminate clearly between isolates by using relatively few loci, therefore limiting the effect of compounding genotyping errors (6).For V. cholerae, five VNTR loci have been identified (15), and the initial application of MLVA at those loci has demonstrated distinct populations of clinical isolates of V. cholerae in different geographic regions within Bangladesh and India (23, 47). Predominant isolates in each of two rural Bangladeshi regions varied gradually over a time scale of months to years (47), and isolates collected from India over a 15-year period varied widely, with individual MLVA types clustering in time and place—some with widespread dissemination and others with limited local occurrence only (23). MLVA has also been used to classify hybrid and altered V. cholerae variants and to demonstrate their genetic distance from the pandemic El Tor strain (10). Use of the MLVA method for epidemiologic study of cholera requires that V. cholerae VNTR alleles remain reasonably stable during bacterial replication in patients or in laboratory culture after isolation. Some degree of stability of two of the five loci used in V. cholerae MLVA has been demonstrated previously by serial passage in vitro through four overnight cultures (15). In this study, we used MLVA to examine V. cholerae O1 and O139 isolates obtained from infected patients and their household contacts—including multiple isolates from the same individual and isolates from multiple individuals within the same household—in a large city where cholera is endemic.