Cascade of Events Governing Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins gD,gH/gL,and gB

Herpesviruses minimally require the envelope proteins gB and gH/gL for virus entry and cell-cell fusion; herpes simplex virus (HSV) additionally requires the receptor-binding protein gD. Although gB is a class III fusion protein, gH/gL does not resemble any documented viral fusion protein at a structural level. Based on those data, we proposed that gH/gL does not function as a cofusogen with gB but instead regulates the fusogenic activity of gB. Here, we present data to support that hypothesis. First, receptor-positive B78H1-C10 cells expressing gH/gL fused with receptor-negative B78H1 cells expressing gB and gD (fusion in trans). Second, fusion occurred when gH/gL-expressing C10 cells preexposed to soluble gD were subsequently cocultured with gB-expressing B78 cells. In contrast, prior exposure of gB-expressing C10 cells to soluble gD did not promote subsequent fusion with gH/gL-expressing B78 cells. These data suggest that fusion involves activation of gH/gL by receptor-bound gD. Most importantly, soluble gH/gL triggered a low level of fusion of C10 cells expressing gD and gB; a much higher level was achieved when gB-expressing C10 cells were exposed to a combination of soluble gH/gL and gD. These data clearly show that gB acts as the HSV fusogen following activation by gD and gH/gL. We suggest the following steps leading to fusion: (i) conformational changes to gD upon receptor binding, (ii) alteration of gH/gL by receptor-activated gD, and (iii) upregulation of the fusogenic potential of gB following its interaction with activated gH/gL. The third step may be common to other herpesviruses.Herpesviruses enter cells by fusing their envelopes with host cell membranes either by direct fusion at the plasma membrane or by pH-dependent or -independent endocytosis, depending on the target cell (27, 29, 39). Although the entry pathways of other enveloped viruses are similarly diverse (8), all systems for which molecular details have been obtained rely on a single fusion protein (43); herpesviruses are unique in their use of gB and the gH/gL heterodimer as their core fusion machinery (17, 37). Some herpesviruses employ additional receptor-binding glycoproteins, e.g., herpex simplex virus (HSV) gD, and others require gH/gL-associated proteins, e.g., UL128-131 of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (34) or gp42 of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (42). This complexity has made it difficult to unravel the mechanism of herpesvirus entry.Ultrastructural and biochemical studies have shown that for HSV entry, binding of gD to one of its receptors, either HVEM or nectin-1 (36), activates the downstream events that drive gB- and gH/gL-dependent fusion (17). The structure of the gB ectodomain (18) bears striking structural homology to the postfusion form of the single fusion protein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (33). However, unlike the other class III viral fusion proteins, VSV G and baculovirus gp64 (5), gB requires gH/gL to function in virus-cell and cell-cell fusion (17). A number of investigations support the concept that gH/gL might also be fusogenic (13, 41). Some have suggested that a multiprotein complex comprised of gD, gH/gL, and gB might be assembled to cause fusion (14). Using bimolecular complementation (BiMC), we and others showed that interactions can occur between half enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-tagged gB (e.g., gBn) and tagged gD (e.g., gDc) or between tagged gD and tagged gH (1, 3). However, because these occur in the absence of one of the other essential components, e.g., a receptor, we could not assess their functional significance. Importantly, gH/gL and gB interact with each other only in response to receptor binding by gD (1-3, 12). We subsequently showed that this interaction precedes fusion and is required for it to occur (2). Thus, we were able to conclude that gH/gL must interact with gB, whether transiently or stably, in order for fusion to occur. Whether gD was indeed involved in a multiprotein complex was not clear, nor was the role of gH/gL in promoting fusion initiated by gD-receptor binding. The lack of structural data for gH/gL left its potential role as a fusogen unresolved.However, in 2010, the structure of gH/gL of HSV-2 was solved in collaboration with Chowdary et al. (12). Structurally, gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusogen, thereby forcing a reconsideration of its function in promoting virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. We hypothesized that gH/gL does not likely act as a cofusogen with gB but rather regulates fusion by gB (12).In this report, we argue that as a regulator of fusion, gH/gL might not have to be in the same membrane as gB in order to regulate its activity, i.e., gH/gL on one cell might promote fusion of gB expressed by another cell, as long as gD and a gD receptor are also present. In support of this, it was recently shown that gH/gL and gB of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause cell-cell fusion when expressed by distinct cells (in trans) (41). We present evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL can cause cell-cell fusion when they are expressed in trans, a process that requires both gD and a gD receptor. Although the efficiency of fusion in trans is low compared with that of fusion when gB and gH/gL are in cis (as they would be when in the virus), separation of these proteins onto two different cells enabled us to dissect the order in which each protein acts along the pathway to fusion. Moreover, we found that a combination of soluble gD (not membrane bound) and soluble gH/gL (also not membrane bound) could trigger fusion of receptor-bearing cells that had been transfected with the gene for gB. Our data show that gD, gH/gL, and gB act in a series of steps whereby gD is first activated by binding its cell receptor. Previous studies showed that receptor binding causes gD to undergo conformational changes (17). Based on the data in this paper, we propose that these changes then enable gD to activate gH/gL into a form that in turn binds to and activates the fusogenic activity of gB. Although we do not know whether any of these reactions result in the formation of a stable complex, our data suggest that gB is the sole HSV fusogen and that gD and gH/gL act to upregulate cell-cell fusion and most likely virus-cell fusion, leading to HSV entry.     

Herpes Simplex Virus gD Forms Distinct Complexes with Fusion Executors gB and gH/gL in Part through the C-terminal Profusion Domain

Herpes simplex virus entry into cells requires a multipartite fusion apparatus made of glycoprotein D (gD), gB, and heterodimer gH/gL. gD serves as a receptor-binding glycoprotein and trigger of fusion; its ectodomain is organized in an N-terminal domain carrying the receptor-binding sites and a C-terminal domain carrying the profusion domain, required for fusion but not receptor binding. gB and gH/gL execute fusion. To understand how the four glycoproteins cross-talk to each other, we searched for biochemical defined complexes in infected and transfected cells and in virions. Previously, interactions were detected in transfected whole cells by split green fluorescent protein complementation (Atanasiu, D., Whitbeck, J. C., Cairns, T. M., Reilly, B., Cohen, G. H., and Eisenberg, R. J. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 18718–18723; Avitabile, E., Forghieri, C., and Campadelli-Fiume, G. (2007) J. Virol. 81, 11532–11537); it was not determined whether they led to biochemical complexes. Infected cells harbor a gD-gH complex (Perez-Romero, P., Perez, A., Capul, A., Montgomery, R., and Fuller, A. O. (2005) J. Virol. 79, 4540–4544). We report that gD formed complexes with gB in the absence of gH/gL and with gH/gL in the absence of gB. Complexes with similar composition were formed in infected and transfected cells. They were also present in virions prior to entry and did not increase at virus entry into the cell. A panel of gD mutants enabled the preliminary location of part of the binding site in gD to gB to the amino acids 240–260 portion and downstream with Thr³⁰⁴-Pro³⁰⁵ as critical residues and of the binding site to gH/gL at the amino acids 260–310 portion with Pro²⁹¹-Pro²⁹² as critical residues. The results indicate that gD carries composite-independent binding sites for gB and gH/gL, both of which are partly located in the profusion domain.     

Bimolecular Complementation Defines Functional Regions of Herpes Simplex Virus gB That Are Involved with gH/gL as a Necessary Step Leading to Cell Fusion

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into cells requires four membrane glycoproteins: gD is the receptor binding protein, and gB and gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery. Crystal structures of gD and its receptors have provided a basis for understanding the initial triggering steps, but how the core fusion proteins function remains unknown. The gB crystal structure shows that it is a class III fusion protein, yet unlike other class members, gB itself does not cause fusion. Bimolecular complementation (BiMC) studies have shown that gD-receptor binding triggers an interaction between gB and gH/gL and concurrently triggers fusion. Left unanswered was whether BiMC led to fusion or was a by-product of it. We used gB monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to block different aspects of these events. Non-virus-neutralizing MAbs to gB failed to block BiMC or fusion. In contrast, gB MAbs that neutralize virus blocked fusion. These MAbs map to three functional regions (FR) of gB. MAbs to FR1, which contains the fusion loops, and FR2 blocked both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, MAbs to FR3, a region involved in receptor binding, blocked fusion but not BiMC. Thus, FR3 MAbs separate the BiMC interaction from fusion, suggesting that BiMC occurs prior to fusion. When substituted for wild-type (wt) gB, fusion loop mutants blocked fusion and BiMC, suggesting that loop insertion precedes BiMC. Thus, we postulate that each of the gB FRs are involved in different aspects of the path leading to fusion. Upon triggering by gD, gB fusion loops are inserted into target lipid membranes. gB then interacts with gH/gL, and this interaction is eventually followed by fusion.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells requires four viral glycoproteins, gB, gD, gH, and gL, plus one of several cell receptors, either herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, or 3-OST (45). Crystal structures and other studies have documented that receptor binding triggers conformational changes to gD that trigger the downstream events leading to fusion (10, 11, 18, 26, 28, 52). Moreover, when HSV receptor-bearing cells are transfected with expression plasmids for glycoproteins gB, gD, gH, and gL, the cells fuse to form multinucleated giant cells or syncytia (39, 48). However, the precise series of events that take place after receptor binding have not yet been fully elucidated. What we do know is that both gB and a heterodimer of gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery that is conserved and required for the fusion step of entry of all herpesviruses (18, 26, 30, 46, 49).Thus far, we know the crystal structure of one form of the gB ectodomain of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) (19). This protein has the characteristics of a fusion protein and is a charter member of the class III group of viral fusion proteins (4). Others in this class include Epstein-Barr virus gB, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G, and baculovirus gp64 (5, 22, 41). Like VSV G and gp64, gB has two putative fusion loops at the base of each protomer of the crystallized trimer. Single-amino-acid mutations in many of the hydrophobic residues of the putative fusion loops of gB ablate its ability to function in cell-cell fusion assays (16, 17). Moreover, these mutants are unable to complement the entry of a gB-null virus (16). Finally, the ectodomains of these mutants, unlike wild-type protein, failed to coassociate with liposomes, indicating that the putative fusion loops do insert into membranes (16, 17). Recently, it was shown that several of these mutants are also defective for fusion events involved in virus egress (51). Together, these studies provide compelling evidence that HSV gB functions as a fusion protein and that the fusion loops are critical for this function. However, unlike VSV G and baculovirus gp64, gB does not function on its own in entry but, rather, requires the participation of gH/gL. In the absence of crystallographic data for gH/gL, it is not yet clear what role it plays in herpesvirus fusion. In a previous study, we used bimolecular complementation (BiMC) to examine protein-protein interactions that occur among the viral glycoproteins during fusion (1). A similar study was carried out by Avitabile et al. (2). The BiMC assay is based on the observation that N- and C-terminal fragments of green fluorescent protein (GFP) (and derivatives such as enhanced yellow fluorescent protein [EYFP]) do not spontaneously reconstitute a functional fluorophore (20, 29, 40). However, the codons for each half can be appended to the genes for two interacting proteins (23, 24). When these are cotransfected, an interaction between the two proteins of interest brings the two halves of the fluorophore in close enough contact to restore fluorescence.When HSV receptor-bearing cells, such as B78H1 cells that are engineered to express nectin-1, are transfected with plasmids that express gB, gD, gH, and gL, they undergo cell-cell fusion (13, 15, 27, 31, 48). When gD is omitted, no fusion occurs. We found that fusion of these transfected cells could be triggered by addition of a soluble form of gD (the gD ectodomain). We then used this approach to examine interactions between gB and gH/gL during cell fusion (1). Therefore, we tagged gB with the C-terminal half of EYFP and gH with the N-terminal half. When plasmids bearing these forms were cotransfected into C10 cells along with a plasmid for untagged gL, no fusion occurred, but importantly, no BiMC occurred. However, when we added gD306, cells began to fuse within 10 min, and all of the syncytia that formed exhibited bright EYFP fluorescence indicative of BiMC. We concluded that gD triggers both fusion and a physical interaction between gB and gH/gL. However, these experiments did not separate these two events, so we were unable to determine if the interaction preceded fusion or merely was a by-product of it.The purpose of this study was to determine if the gB-gH/gL interaction is essential for fusion and if it occurs prior to fusion. We focused on gB because its structure is known and we have a panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to gB. Our approach was to determine which of these MAbs, if any, could block fusion and also block the interaction with gH/gL. We also examined the effect of mutations to the fusion loops of gB on its interaction with gH/gL. We previously mapped these MAbs to four functional regions (FR) of gB, three of which were resolved in the crystal structure (6, 19). Of these, FR1 contains the fusion loops, FR2 is in the center of the gB structure with no known function, and FR3 is at in the crown of the protein and may be involved in binding to cells (7). Our rationale was that if the interaction between gB and gH/gL is important for fusion, then it should not be blocked by nonneutralizing anti-gB MAbs. At the same time, we thought that some neutralizing MAbs might not only block fusion but also block BiMC. We found that neutralizing MAbs to FR1 and FR2 inhibited both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, we found that neutralizing MAbs that map to FR3 blocked fusion but failed to block the interaction between gB and gH/gL, thereby dissociating the two events. Finally, we found that gB mutants with changes in the fusion loops that were fusion negative were also unable to bind to gH/gL. The latter results suggest that insertion of gB into the target membrane precedes its interaction with gH/gL.     

Mutations in the Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 gL Can Reduce Cell-Cell Fusion without Affecting gH/gL Trafficking

The gH/gL heterodimer represents two of the four herpes simplex virus glycoproteins necessary and sufficient for membrane fusion. We generated deletions and point mutations covering gL residues 24 to 43 to investigate that region''s role in gH/gL intracellular trafficking and in membrane fusion. Multiple mutants displayed a 40 to 60% reduction in cell fusion with no effect on gH/gL trafficking. The amino terminus of gL plays an important role in the gH/gL contribution to membrane fusion.     

Insertional Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 gL Identify Functional Domains for Association with gH and for Membrane Fusion

Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion. This glycoprotein oligomerizes with gH to form a membrane-bound heterodimer but can be secreted when expressed without gH. Twelve unique gL linker-insertion mutants were generated to identify regions critical for gH binding and gH/gL processing and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. All gL mutants were detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting incomplete cleavage of the signal peptide or the presence of a cell surface receptor for secreted gL. Coexpression with gH enhanced the levels of cell surface gL detected by antibodies for all gL mutants except those that were defective in their interactions with gH. Two insertions into a conserved region of gL abrogated the binding of gL to gH and prevented gH expression on the cell surface. Three other insertions reduced the cell surface expression of gH and/or altered the properties of gH/gL heterodimers. Altered or absent interaction of gL with gH was correlated with reduced or absent cell fusion activity and impaired complementation of virion infectivity. These results identify a conserved domain of gL that is critical for its binding to gH and two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the conserved domain, that are critical for the gH/gL complex to perform its role in membrane fusion.Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of the four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion (26, 33). The others are gB, gD, and gH (30). The functional unit containing gL is a heterodimer formed with gH (gH/gL) (15). Because mature gL has no membrane-spanning domain, other than a cleavable signal peptide, it is secreted unless it is coexpressed with gH, a type 1 glycoprotein that anchors gL to the cell membrane (2). Also, gH is not properly processed or transported out of the endoplasmic reticulum unless it is coexpressed with gL (15).Most, if not all, herpesviruses express orthologs of gB, gH, and gL, which are believed to form the core membrane-fusing machinery necessary for viral entry and cell fusion. For some herpesviruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus, the gH/gL oligomer may contain additional viral subunits that can influence binding of the complex to cell receptors and determine cell tropism (14, 34, 35). For HSV, however, only gD and gB have been shown to have receptor-binding activities that are required for entry (27, 31). Although HSV gH has an RGD motif and the gH/gL heterodimer can bind to certain integrins, this binding seems not to be necessary for viral entry (3, 22).The initial interaction of HSV with cells can be the reversible attachment of virus to cell surface heparan sulfate, mediated by viral glycoprotein gB and/or gC (29). Then, gD can bind to one of its receptors, including herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family; nectin-1 or nectin-2, cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily; or specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by 3-O-sulfotransferases (31). In addition to binding to heparan sulfate, gB can also bind to other cell surface receptors, including paired immunoglobulin-like receptor alpha (PILRα) (27). Binding of both gD and gB to one of their respective receptors appears to be required for triggering the membrane-fusing activity of gB and/or gH/gL, which leads to viral entry.A recent X-ray structure of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB suggests that it is a class III viral fusogen similar in domain organization, but not primary sequence, to the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus (13). It has been proposed that HSV-1 gH has features characteristic of class I viral fusogens, such as putative heptad repeats and fusion peptides (6, 9-11). Also, peptides matching the sequence of gH can interact with lipids and/or induce the fusion of lipid vesicles (4, 5, 8). Hemifusion between cells and between virus and cell can be induced by gH/gL and gD in the absence of gB (32). Many questions remain about the respective roles of gH/gL and gB in inducing membrane fusion.The four conserved cysteines in gL were found to be essential for gL-gH association and function (1). Mutational analyses of gL by C-terminal deletions showed that the first 147 amino acids of gL are sufficient for association with gH but that the first 161 amino acids are necessary for cotransport of gH and gL to the cell surface (17, 23) and for gL activity in cell fusion and viral entry (17). Lastly, certain anti-gL monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) can inhibit cell fusion but not viral entry, despite demonstrable binding of the MAbs to virus, suggesting that gL may play a different role in each process (21). These MAbs were mapped to the C-terminal region of gL (21, 23). The diagram at the bottom of Fig. ​Fig.11 shows the locations of the gL features mentioned above and of the signal peptide.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of insertional mutations on HSV-1 gL and gH cell surface expression. CHO cells were transfected with plasmids expressing gH and WT gL or a gL mutant. Cell surface expression of gL and gH was quantified by CELISA using polyclonal R88 antiserum (filled circles) and MAb 52S (open triangles), respectively. A linear representation of the gL polypeptide is shown below the graph, with coded bars identifying features of gL. The bars represent the signal peptide (uncolored hatched), the N-terminal 161-amino-acid fragment necessary for the formation of functional gH/gL complexes (dark gray), highly conserved residues within this fragment (cross-hatched dark- gray bar), and epitopes recognized by a panel of anti-gL MAbs (light-gray and uncolored vertically striped bars). The values presented for cell surface expression of each mutant gL and of cotransfected WT gH are means from three independent experiments expressed as percentages of WT gL (or of gH cotransfected with WT gL) values, after subtraction of background values obtained in the absence of gL expression and as a function of the position of the insertion. Standard deviations are presented in Fig. ​Fig.22 and ​and33 for similar experiments.The interactions between gL and gH required for proper intracellular transport, processing, and cell surface expression make it difficult to investigate the functional role of one of these glycoproteins in cell fusion and viral entry independently of the other. We generated a panel of gL linker-insertion mutants to identify regions critical for gH binding and transport and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. One aim was to determine whether these roles of gL could be dissociated or were linked. Characterization of 12 unique gL linker-insertion mutants showed that (i) a conserved domain of gL is critical for the physical interaction of gL with gH and for the normal processing of gH, (ii) two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the highly conserved domain, are critical for the normal conformation and function of gH/gL heterodimers, and (iii) wild-type (WT) and mutant gLs can be detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting the possibility of an independent role for uncomplexed gL. These results support and extend previous studies suggesting that gL has a larger role in membrane fusion than serving as a chaperone for gH and that specific mutations in gL can influence the function of the gH/gL heterodimer.     

Glycoproteins gB, gD, and gHgL of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Are Necessary and Sufficient To Mediate Membrane Fusion in a Cos Cell Transfection System

Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins gB, gD, and gHgL were expressed by transient transfection of Cos cells. Polykaryocyte formation above the background level seen in untransfected controls was observed only if all three components were expressed. Thus, gB, gD, and gHgL are necessary and sufficient to induce membrane fusion.     

Dual Split Protein-Based Fusion Assay Reveals that Mutations to Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Glycoprotein gB Alter the Kinetics of Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by HSV Entry Glycoproteins

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry and cell-cell fusion require glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. We propose that receptor-activated changes to gD cause it to activate gH/gL, which then triggers gB into an active form. We employed a dual split-protein (DSP) assay to monitor the kinetics of HSV glycoprotein-induced cell-cell fusion. This assay measures content mixing between two cells, i.e., fusion, within the same cell population in real time (minutes to hours). Titration experiments suggest that both gD and gH/gL act in a catalytic fashion to trigger gB. In fact, fusion rates are governed by the amount of gB on the cell surface. We then used the DSP assay to focus on mutants in two functional regions (FRs) of gB, FR1 and FR3. FR1 contains the fusion loops (FL1 and FL2), and FR3 encompasses the crown at the trimer top. All FL mutants initiated fusion very slowly, if at all. However, the fusion rates caused by some FL2 mutants increased over time, so that total fusion by 8 h looked much like that of the WT. Two distinct kinetic patterns, “slow and fast,” emerged for mutants in the crown of gB (FR3), again showing differences in initiation and ongoing fusion. Of note are the fusion kinetics of the gB syn mutant (LL871/872AA). Although this mutant was originally included as an ongoing high-rate-of-fusion control, its initiation of fusion is so rapid that it appears to be on a “hair trigger.” Thus, the DSP assay affords a unique way to examine the dynamics of HSV glycoprotein-induced cell fusion.     

Mutations in the Cytoplasmic Tail of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 gH Reduce the Fusogenicity of gB in Transfected Cells

Mutations within the cytoplasmic tail (cytotail) of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) gH were previously observed to suppress the syncytial phenotype of gB cytoplasmic domain mutant A855V in infected cells. Here, we examined the effects of gH cytotail mutations on virus-free cell-cell fusion in transfected cells to exclude the contributions of viral proteins other than gD, gH/gL, and gB. We show that a truncation at residue 832 coupled with the point mutation V831A within the cytotail of gH reduces fusion regardless of whether the wild type (WT) or a syn gB allele is present. We hypothesize that the gH cytotail mutations either reduce activation of gB by gH/gL or suppress the fusogenicity of gB through another, as yet unknown mechanism. The gB cytodomain and the gH cytotail do not interact in vitro, suggesting that mutations in the gH cytotail may instead affect the function of the gH/gL ectodomain. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that the gB cytodomain and the gH cytotail interact in the context of full-length membrane-anchored proteins. The observed fusion suppression in transfected cells is less prominent than what was seen in infected cells, and we propose that gH cytotail mutations may additionally suppress syncytium formation in cells infected with syn HSV-1 by acting on other viral proteins, reinforcing the idea that fusion of HSV-infected cells is a complex phenomenon. Although fusion suppression by the gH cytotail mutant in transfected cells was evident when syncytia were visualized and counted, it was not detected by the luciferase assay, highlighting the differences between the two assays.     

Fusion between Perinuclear Virions and the Outer Nuclear Membrane Requires the Fusogenic Activity of Herpes Simplex Virus gB

Herpesviruses cross nuclear membranes (NMs) in two steps, as follows: (i) capsids assemble and bud through the inner NM into the perinuclear space, producing enveloped virus particles, and (ii) the envelopes of these virus particles fuse with the outer NM. Two herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins, gB and gH (the latter, likely complexed as a heterodimer with gL), are necessary for the second step of this process. Mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate in the perinuclear space or in herniations (membrane vesicles derived from the inner NM). Both gB and gH/gL are also known to act directly in fusing the virion envelope with host cell membranes during HSV entry into cells, i.e., both glycoproteins appear to function directly in different aspects of the membrane fusion process. We hypothesized that HSV gB and gH/gL also act directly in the membrane fusion that occurs during virus egress from the nucleus. Previous studies of the role of gB and gH/gL in nuclear egress involved HSV gB and gH null mutants that could potentially also possess gross defects in the virion envelope. Here, we produced recombinant HSV-expressing mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in the hydrophobic “fusion loops.” These fusion loops are thought to play a direct role in membrane fusion by insertion into cellular membranes. HSV recombinants expressing gB with any one of four fusion loop mutations (W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D) were unable to enter cells. Moreover, two of the mutants, W174Y and Y179K, displayed reduced abilities to mediate HSV cell-to-cell spread, and W174R and A261D exhibited no spread. All mutant viruses exhibited defects in nuclear egress, enveloped virions accumulated in herniations and in the perinuclear space, and fewer enveloped virions were detected on cell surfaces. These results support the hypothesis that gB functions directly to mediate the fusion between perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM.Herpesvirus glycoproteins gB and gH/gL participate in two separate membrane fusion events that occur during different stages of virus replication. First, during virus entry into cells, gB and gH/gL promote fusion between the virion envelope and either the plasma membrane or endosomes (reviewed in references 6, 21, 27, and 39). Second, herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB and gH (likely complexed to form a heterodimer with gL), and likely homologues in other herpesviruses, promote nuclear egress (12). Herpesvirus capsids are produced in the nucleus and cross the nuclear envelope (NE) by envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane (NM), producing perinuclear virions that then fuse with the outer NM (reviewed in references 35 and 36). There is evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL function in a redundant fashion in fusion between enveloped, perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12), whereas both gB and gH/gL are essential for entry fusion (8, 13, 38). Much more is known about the mechanisms involved in entry fusion than those involved in egress fusion, and many important questions remain in terms of how these two membrane fusion processes relate to each other.Entry of HSV into cells involves interactions between the viral receptor-binding protein gD and the gD receptors (16, 28, 30, 37). When gD binds to its receptors, there are conformational changes in gD which apparently activate gB and gH/gL, so that these glycoproteins promote fusion involving the virion envelope and cellular membranes (21, 32). By using split green fluorescent protein fusion proteins, also denoted bimolecular complementation, two groups showed that gD binding to gD ligands triggers interactions between gB and gH/gL and that this is accompanied by cell-cell fusion (1, 2). There is also evidence that gB and gH/gL contribute to different stages of membrane fusion. When gH/gL is expressed with gD, there is hemifusion (mixing of the outer leaflets of membranes) of adjacent cells, and this partial fusion is apparently mediated by gH/gL (41). However, full fusion (mixing of both inner and outer leaflets) occurs only when gB is coexpressed with gD and gH/gL (41). Also supporting a role for gH in membrane fusion, peptides based on heptad repeats in gH can disrupt model membranes (14, 15, 17). HSV gB is a class III fusion protein, structurally similar to vesicular stomatitis virus G protein, with a three-stranded coil-coil barrel in the central region of the molecule reminiscent of class I fusion proteins, e.g., influenza virus hemagglutinin (22). Therefore, herpesvirus gB and gH/gL differ substantially from the fusion proteins expressed by all other well-studied viruses because both gB and gH/gL participate directly in membrane fusion, apparently functioning in different aspects of entry fusion.HSV gB and other viral class III fusion proteins differ from class I fusion proteins that have N-terminal, hydrophobic fusion peptides because class III fusion proteins possess internal bipartite “fusion loops” composed of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues (3, 22). In the solved structure of the HSV gB ectodomain, which might represent a postfusion form of the protein, the fusion loops are located near the base of the molecule, adjacent to the virion envelope (22). Mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in these fusion loops displayed diminished cell-cell fusion activity when transfected into cells with gD and gH/gL (20). Cell-cell fusion approximates the fusion that occurs during entry, defining the minimal fusion machinery, although there are differences between entry and cell-cell fusion (10). Moreover, full-length gB molecules with fusion loop mutations failed to complement gB null HSV (19). Recently, it was demonstrated that the HSV gB extracellular domain can interact with liposomes in vitro and that this binding depends upon gB''s fusion loops (19).Herpesvirus capsids are assembled in the nucleus and acquire an envelope by budding through the inner NM. For a short time, enveloped virus particles are found in the space between the inner and outer NMs (perinuclear space), but then the envelopes of these particles fuse with the outer NM, releasing capsids into the cytoplasm (reviewed in references 35 and 36). Cytoplasmic capsids acquire a second envelope by budding into the trans-Golgi network, and this secondary envelopment involves redundant or additive functions of gE/gI and gD, i.e., either of these glycoproteins will suffice (11). The second step of the nuclear egress pathway involving membrane fusion between the envelope of perinuclear particles and the outer NM requires HSV glycoproteins gB and gH/gL (12). HSV double mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate enveloped virus particles in the perinuclear space and in herniations, i.e., membrane vesicles that bulge into the nucleoplasm and derive from the inner NM (12). These observations, coupled with the evidence that gB and gH/gL are fusion proteins, suggested that gB and gH/gL promote the fusion between virus particles and the outer NM. However, there is one important difference between nuclear egress fusion and entry fusion. Virus mutants lacking either gB or gH are unable to enter cells, but such mutants have fewer defects in nuclear egress than double mutants lacking both gB and gH (12). Thus, as with secondary envelopment that involves gD and gE/gI, glycoproteins gB and gH/gL act in a redundant or additive fashion to mediate the fusion between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM. It is also important to note that there appear to be other mechanisms by which HSV particles can exit the perinuclear space. For example, although a substantial number of gB gH null double mutants accumulated in herniations (increased by ∼10-fold), some virions were seen on cell surfaces, although their numbers were reduced by ∼2.5- to 5-fold compared with those of wild-type HSV (12, 46).HSV entry fusion is triggered by gD binding to one of its ligands. However, it is not clear what triggers fusion of the envelope of perinuclear particles with the outer NM. gD, gB, gH, gM, gK, and other viral membrane proteins are all present in NMs and in perinuclear virus particles (4, 12, 25, 40, 42, 44). It seems unlikely that there are substantial quantities of known gD receptors in NMs, although this has not been carefully examined and there may well be unidentified gD receptors present in NMs. However, if fusion at NMs is not activated by gD binding to gD receptors, there must be other mechanisms to trigger this fusion. There is evidence that HSV gK negatively regulates fusion at the NE because (i) overexpression of gK causes enveloped virus particles to accumulate in the perinuclear space (25) and (ii) gK is primarily localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and NM and is not substantially found in extracellular virions (26, 34). Another potential regulatory mechanism for fusion at the outer NM involves phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of gB by the HSV kinase US3 (46). An HSV recombinant lacking gH and expressing a mutant gB with a substitution, T887A, affecting an amino acid in the gB cytoplasmic domain displayed reduced US3-dependent phosphorylation and accumulated enveloped virus particles in herniations (46). This mutation in gB did not alter HSV entry into cells (31, 46). Together, these results suggest that HSV fusion with the outer NM differs from entry fusion in some, but likely not all, important mechanistic details.Given that both gB and gH/gL are well established as fusion proteins for virus entry, we hypothesized that these glycoproteins directly mediate the membrane fusion that occurs between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12, 46). However, there are other possibilities. For example, it is conceivable that loss of both gB and gH alters the structure of the envelope of perinuclear HSV virions so that other HSV glycoproteins (that directly promote fusion) are affected. To address this issue and extend our understanding of how gB functions in nuclear egress fusion, we constructed HSV recombinants that express mutant forms of gB with substitutions in the fusion loops. These viruses also lacked gH, making nuclear egress totally dependent on a functional form of gB. By propagating these recombinants using gH-expressing cells, we could produce virus particles including gH and the mutant gB molecules. These HSV recombinants expressing gH as well as gB fusion loops, W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D, were all unable to enter cells. However, two recombinants, expressing W174Y and Y179K, exhibited some cell-to-cell spread while the other two, expressing W174R and A261D, did not spread beyond single infected cells. All four recombinants infected into cells lacking gH exhibited defects in nuclear egress. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that gB acts directly to mediate the fusion of the virion envelope with the outer NM during HSV egress.     

Functional Fluorescent Protein Insertions in Herpes Simplex Virus gB Report on gB Conformation before and after Execution of Membrane Fusion

Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into a target cell requires complex interactions and conformational changes by viral glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. During viral entry, gB transitions from a prefusion to a postfusion conformation, driving fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane. While the structure of postfusion gB is known, the prefusion conformation of gB remains elusive. As the prefusion conformation of gB is a critical target for neutralizing antibodies, we set out to describe its structure by making genetic insertions of fluorescent proteins (FP) throughout the gB ectodomain. We created gB constructs with FP insertions in each of the three globular domains of gB. Among 21 FP insertion constructs, we found 8 that allowed gB to remain membrane fusion competent. Due to the size of an FP, regions in gB that tolerate FP insertion must be solvent exposed. Two FP insertion mutants were cell-surface expressed but non-functional, while FP insertions located in the crown were not surface expressed. This is the first report of placing a fluorescent protein insertion within a structural domain of a functional viral fusion protein, and our results are consistent with a model of prefusion HSV gB constructed from the prefusion VSV G crystal structure. Additionally, we found that functional FP insertions from two different structural domains could be combined to create a functional form of gB labeled with both CFP and YFP. FRET was measured with this construct, and we found that when co-expressed with gH/gL, the FRET signal from gB was significantly different from the construct containing CFP alone, as well as gB found in syncytia, indicating that this construct and others of similar design are likely to be powerful tools to monitor the conformation of gB in any model system accessible to light microscopy.     

Differential Effects on Cell Fusion Activity of Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein B (gB) Dependent on Whether a gD Receptor or a gB Receptor Is Overexpressed

Glycoprotein B (gB) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) is one of four glycoproteins essential for viral entry and cell fusion. Recently, paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) was identified as a receptor for HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB. Both PILRα and a gD receptor were shown to participate in HSV-1 entry into certain cell types. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insertional mutations in gB had differential effects on its function with PILRα and the gD receptor, nectin-1. Previously described gB mutants and additional newly characterized mutants were used in this study. We found that insertional mutations near the N terminus and C terminus of gB and especially in the central region of the ectodomain reduced cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed much more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed. Most of the insertions reduced the binding of gB to PILRα, for at least some forms of gB, but this reduction did not necessarily correlate with the selective reduction in cell fusion activity with PILRα. These results suggest that the regions targeted by the relevant mutations are critical for functional activity with PILRα. They also suggest that, although both the binding of gB to a gB receptor and the binding of gD to a gD receptor may be required for HSV-induced cell fusion, the two receptor-binding activities may have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.Manifestations of disease caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) include recurrent mucocutaneous lesions in the mouth or on the face or genitalia and, more rarely, meningitis or encephalitis. The infection of host cells occurs by the fusion of the virion envelope with a cell membrane to deliver the nucleocapsid containing the viral genome into the host cell. This entry process and virus-induced cell fusion require glycoprotein B (gB), along with gD, gH, and gL. The membrane-fusing activity of HSV depends in part on the binding of gD to one of its receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, nectin-2, or 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (18). HVEM is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family and is expressed by cells of the immune system, as well as many other cell types, such as epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells (23). Nectin-1 and nectin-2 are cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily and are widely expressed by a variety of cell types, including epithelial cells and neurons (20). Specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by particular 3-O-sulfotransferases can serve as gD-binding entry receptors (17). This binding of gD to a receptor is associated with conformational changes in gD that are thought to enable gD to interact with gB and/or the heterodimer gH-gL to trigger fusogenic activity (8, 12). Both gB and gH have properties of fusogenic viral proteins (1, 7). Although evidence has been presented that gD and gH-gL are sufficient for hemifusion and that gB, in addition, is required for fusion pore formation (19), the specific roles each plays in HSV-induced membrane fusion have not been fully defined.gB was recently discovered to bind to paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) in an interaction that can mediate viral entry and cell fusion, provided that gD also binds to one of its receptors (14). For cells such as CD14⁺ monocytes, antibodies specific for either HVEM or PILRα were shown to block HSV entry. Also, entry requires the presence of both gD and gB in the virion. Although the overexpression of either a gD receptor or a gB receptor can enhance the susceptibility of cells to HSV entry and HSV-induced cell fusion, there are very few, if any, cell types that do not express at least low levels of endogenous receptors. Thus, the possibility exists that these endogenous receptors are cooperating with the introduced receptors to render the cells susceptible to HSV-induced membrane fusion.PILRα belongs to the paired-receptor families, which consist of activating and inhibitory receptors (4, 11, 19). They are conserved among mammals (24). The inhibitory form PILRα has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif in its cytoplasmic domain and transduces inhibitory signals (4). On the other hand, the activating form PILRβ associates with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-bearing DAP12 adaptor molecule and delivers activating signals (16). Both PILRα and PILRβ are expressed on cells of the immune system, especially monocytes, dendritic cells, and NK cells (4, 11, 19), and also in neurons (14). CD99 has been identified as a natural ligand for both PILRα and PILRβ (16). The binding of either PILRα or PILRβ to CD99 depends on the presence of sialyated O-linked glycans on CD99 (22).In addition to binding to PILRα, gB can bind to heparin and heparan sulfate and may contribute, along with gC, to the binding of HSV to cell surface heparan sulfate (17). Also, gB and gC can bind to DC-SIGN, which serves as a binding receptor for the infection of dendritic cells (2). An X-ray structure of the HSV-1 gB ectodomain reveals a homotrimeric conformation with structural homology to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G glycoprotein, the single glycoprotein responsible for the entry of VSV. Both HSV-1 gB and VSV G glycoprotein have features of class 1 and class 2 viral fusion proteins and have been designated class 3 fusion proteins (7, 14, 15). The heparan sulfate-binding determinant of gB has been localized to a lysine-rich domain in the N terminus and shown to be dispensable for viral entry (9). It lies within a region that is probably disordered and was not included in the defined coordinates of the X-ray structure. The binding of DC-SIGN to gB probably depends on high-mannose N-glycans of gB (6).In a previous study (10), 81 insertion mutants of HSV-1 gB were characterized to assess the effects of the insertions on protein processing and function in cell fusion with gD receptors, in relation to structural domains of gB identified in an X-ray structure (7). Only 27 mutants were found to be processed into mature glycosylated forms and transported to the cell surface. Only 11 of these retained fusion activity toward target cells expressing nectin-1 or HVEM. For the present study, we used 25 previously described gB insertion mutants shown to be expressed on cell surfaces and also identified an additional 10 such mutants.The present study was designed to determine whether the effects of insertions in gB on cell fusion activity would be dependent on whether a gD receptor (nectin-1) or a gB receptor (PILRα) was overexpressed in target cells that also expressed unidentified weak endogenous receptors. In addition, we assessed the abilities of the gB mutants to bind to PILRα. Our results showed that some insertions inhibited cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed significantly more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed, but without necessarily preventing the binding of PILRα to gB, at least to some stable oligomeric forms of gB. The results indicate that, although both a gB receptor and a gD receptor may be required for cell fusion activity, the two receptor-binding activities have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins: Participation of Individual Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein Antigens in Immunocytolysis and Their Correlation with Previously Identified Glycopolypeptides

Tissue culture cells infected with herpes simplex type 1 virus express virus-specified glycoprotein antigens on the plasma membrane. Three of these have been previously identified and have been designated as Ag-11, Ag-8, and Ag-6. In the present study, immunoglobulins to each of the antigens were shown to be capable of mediating immunocytolysis in the presence of either complement (antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytotoxicity) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [ADCC]). Two herpes simplex virus type 1 strains, VR-3 and F, reacted similarly in the ADCC test in the presence of immunoglobulins to Ag-11, Ag-8, and Ag-6 in both infected Chang liver cells and HEp-2 cells. Anti-Ag-6, however, produced a lower ADCC reaction in HEp-2 cells than in Chang liver cells, suggesting differences in the Ag-6 surface expression in, or release from, these cells. Chang liver and HEp-2 cells infected with the MP mutant strain of herpes simplex virus type 1 showed reduced ADCC in the presence of anti-Ag-11 and anti-Ag-8, but no reactivity at all with anti-Ag-6. Crossed immunoelectrophoretic analysis showed that MP-infected cell extracts contain Ag-11 and Ag-8, but lack Ag-6. Polypeptide analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 strains F, VR-3, and MP showed that Ag-11 consists of the glycoproteins gA and gB, that Ag-8 consists of gD, and that Ag-6 consists of gC. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that either one of the glycoproteins (gC, gD, and a mixture of gA and gB) can function as a target for immunocytolysis and that the antibody preparation to gC (Ag-6) does not cross-react with any of the other glycoproteins.     

Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein K,but not its syncytial allele,inhibits cell-cell fusion mediated by the four fusogenic glycoproteins,gD, gB,gH, and gL

A Myc epitope was inserted at residue 283 of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein K (gK), a position previously shown not to interfere with gK activity. The Myc-tagged gK localized predominantly to the endoplasmic reticulum, both in uninfected and in HSV-infected cells. gK, coexpressed with the four HSV fusogenic glycoproteins, gD, gB, gH, and gL, inhibited cell-cell fusion. The effect was partially dose dependent and was observed both in baby hamster kidney (BHK) and in Vero cells, indicating that the antifusion activity of gK may be cell line independent. The antifusion activity of gK did not require viral proteins other than the four fusogenic glycoproteins. A syncytial (syn) allele of gK (syn-gK) carrying the A40V substitution present in HSV-1(MP) did not block fusion to the extent seen with the wild-type (wt) gK, indicating that the syn mutation ablated, at least in part, the antifusogenic activity of wt gK. We conclude that gK is part of the mechanism whereby HSV negatively regulates its own fusion activity. Its effect accounts for the notion that cells infected with wt HSV do not fuse with adjacent, uninfected cells into multinucleated giant cells or syncytia. gK may also function to preclude fusion between virion envelope and the virion-encasing vesicles during virus transport to the extracellular compartment, thus preventing nucleocapsid de-envelopment in the cytoplasm.     

Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein M and the Membrane-Associated Protein UL11 Are Required for Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Efficient Virus Entry

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) facilitates virus entry into cells and cell-to-cell spread by mediating fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes and fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Although virus strains isolated from herpetic lesions cause limited cell fusion in cell culture, clinical herpetic lesions typically contain large syncytia, underscoring the importance of cell-to-cell fusion in virus spread in infected tissues. Certain mutations in glycoprotein B (gB), gK, UL20, and other viral genes drastically enhance virus-induced cell fusion in vitro and in vivo. Recent work has suggested that gB is the sole fusogenic glycoprotein, regulated by interactions with the viral glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gK, membrane protein UL20, and cellular receptors. Recombinant viruses were constructed to abolish either gM or UL11 expression in the presence of strong syncytial mutations in either gB or gK. Virus-induced cell fusion caused by deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB or the dominant syncytial mutation in gK (Ala to Val at amino acid 40) was drastically reduced in the absence of gM. Similarly, syncytial mutations in either gB or gK did not cause cell fusion in the absence of UL11. Neither the gM nor UL11 gene deletion substantially affected gB, gC, gD, gE, and gH glycoprotein synthesis and expression on infected cell surfaces. Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the membrane protein UL20, which is found as a protein complex with gK, interacted with gM while gM did not interact with other viral glycoproteins. Viruses produced in the absence of gM or UL11 entered into cells more slowly than their parental wild-type virus strain. Collectively, these results indicate that gM and UL11 are required for efficient membrane fusion events during virus entry and virus spread.