Divergent Evolution of Norovirus GII/4 by Genome Recombination from May 2006 to February 2009 in Japan

Norovirus GII/4 is a leading cause of acute viral gastroenteritis in humans. We examined here how the GII/4 virus evolves to generate and sustain new epidemics in humans, using 199 near-full-length GII/4 genome sequences and 11 genome segment clones from human stool specimens collected at 19 sites in Japan between May 2006 and February 2009. Phylogenetic studies demonstrated outbreaks of 7 monophyletic GII/4 subtypes, among which a single subtype, termed 2006b, had continually predominated. Phylogenetic-tree, bootscanning-plot, and informative-site analyses revealed that 4 of the 7 GII/4 subtypes were mosaics of recently prevalent GII/4 subtypes and 1 was made up of the GII/4 and GII/12 genotypes. Notably, single putative recombination breakpoints with the highest statistical significance were constantly located around the border of open reading frame 1 (ORF1) and ORF2 (P ≤ 0.000001), suggesting outgrowth of specific recombinant viruses in the outbreaks. The GII/4 subtypes had many unique amino acids at the time of their outbreaks, especially in the N-term, 3A-like, and capsid proteins. Unique amino acids in the capsids were preferentially positioned on the outer surface loops of the protruding P2 domain and more abundant in the dominant subtypes. These findings suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is a common mechanism that realizes independent and concurrent changes on the virion surface and in viral replication proteins for the persistence of norovirus GII/4 in human populations.Norovirus (NoV) is a nonenveloped RNA virus that belongs to the family Caliciviridae and can cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. The NoV genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense, polyadenylated RNA that encodes three open reading frames, ORF1, ORF2, and ORF3 (68). ORF1 encodes a long polypeptide (∼200 kDa) that is cleaved in the cells by the viral proteinase (3C^pro) into six proteins (4). These proteins function in NoV replication in host cells (19). ORF2 encodes a viral capsid protein, VP1. The capsid gene evolved at a rate of 4.3 × 10⁻³ nucleotide substitutions/site/year (7), which is comparable to the substitution rates of the envelope and capsid genes of human immunodeficiency virus (30). The capsid protein of NoV consists of a shell (S) and two protruding (P) domains: P1 and P2 (47). The S domain is relatively conserved within the same genetic lineages of NoVs (38) and is responsible for the assembly of VP1 (6). The P1 subdomain is also relatively conserved (38) and has a role in enhancing the stability of virus particles (6). The P2 domain is positioned at the most exposed surface of the virus particle (47) and forms binding clefts for putative infection receptors, such as human histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) (8, 13, 14, 60). The P2 domain also contains epitopes for neutralizing antibodies (27, 33) and is consistently highly variable even within the same genetic lineage of NoVs (38). ORF3 encodes a VP2 protein that is suggested to be a minor structural component of virus particles (18) and to be responsible for the expression and stabilization of VP1 (5).Thus far, the NoVs found in nature are classified into five genogroups (GI to GV) and multiple genotypes on the basis of the phylogeny of capsid sequences (71). Among them, genogroup II genotype 4 (GII/4), which was present in humans in the mid-1970s (7), is now the leading cause of NoV-associated acute gastroenteritis in humans (54). The GII/4 is further subclassifiable into phylogenetically distinct subtypes (32, 38, 53). Notably, the emergence and spread of a new GII/4 subtype with multiple amino acid substitutions on the capsid surface are often associated with greater magnitudes of NoV epidemics (53, 54). In 2006 and 2007, a GII/4 subtype, termed 2006b, prevailed globally over preexisting GII/4 subtypes in association with increased numbers of nonbacterial acute gastroenteritis cases in many countries, including Japan (32, 38, 53). The 2006b subtype has multiple unique amino acid substitutions that occur most preferentially in the protruding subdomain of the capsid, the P2 subdomain (32, 38, 53). Together with information on human population immunity against NoV GII/4 subtypes (12, 32), it has been postulated that the accumulation of P2 mutations gives rise to antigenic drift and plays a key role in new epidemics of NoV GII/4 in humans (32, 38, 53).Genetic recombination is common in RNA viruses (67). In NoV, recombination was first suggested by the phylogenetic analysis of an NoV genome segment clone: a discordant branching order was noted with the trees of the 3D^pol and capsid coding regions (21). Subsequently, many studies have reported the phylogenetic discordance using sequences from various epidemic sites in different study periods (1, 10, 11, 16, 17, 22, 25, 40, 41, 44-46, 49, 51, 57, 63, 64, 66). These results suggest that genome recombination frequently occurs among distinct lineages of NoV variants in vivo. However, the studies were done primarily with direct sequencing data of the short genome portion, and information on the cloned genome segment or full-length genome sequences is very limited (21, 25). Therefore, we lack an overview of the structural and temporal dynamics of viral genomes during NoV epidemics, and it remains unclear whether NoV mosaicism plays a role in these events.To clarify these issues, we collected 199 near-full-length genome sequences of GII/4 from NoV outbreaks over three recent years in Japan, divided them into monophyletic subtypes, analyzed the temporal and geographical distribution of the subtypes, collected phylogenetic evidence for the viral genome mosaicism of the subtypes, identified putative recombination breakpoints in the genomes, and isolated mosaic genome segments from the stool specimens. We also performed computer-assisted sequence and structural analyses with the identified subtypes to address the relationship between the numbers of P2 domain mutations at the times of the outbreaks and the magnitudes of the epidemics. The obtained data suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is common in the new GII/4 outbreaks and promotes the effective acquisition of mutation sets of heterogeneous capsid surface and viral replication proteins.     

High-Resolution X-Ray Structure and Functional Analysis of the Murine Norovirus 1 Capsid Protein Protruding Domain

Murine noroviruses (MNV) are closely related to the human noroviruses (HuNoV), which cause the majority of nonbacterial gastroenteritis. Unlike HuNoV, MNV grow in culture and in a small-animal model that represents a tractable model to study norovirus biology. To begin a detailed investigation of molecular events that occur during norovirus binding to cells, the crystallographic structure of the murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1) capsid protein protruding (P) domain has been determined. Crystallization of the bacterially expressed protein yielded two different crystal forms (Protein Data Bank identifiers [PDB ID], 3LQ6 and 3LQE). Comparison of the structures indicated a large degree of structural mobility in loops on the surface of the P2 subdomain. Specifically, the A′-B′ and E′-F′ loops were found in open and closed conformations. These regions of high mobility include the known escape mutation site for the neutralizing antibody A6.2 and an attenuation mutation site, which arose after serial passaging in culture and led to a loss in lethality in STAT1^−/− mice, respectively. Modeling of a Fab fragment and crystal structures of the P dimer into the cryoelectron microscopy three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction of the A6.2/MNV-1 complex indicated that the closed conformation is most likely bound to the Fab fragment and that the antibody contact is localized to the A′-B′ and E′-F′ loops. Therefore, we hypothesize that these loop regions and the flexibility of the P domains play important roles during MNV-1 binding to the cell surface.Murine noroviruses (MNV) are members of the family Caliciviridae, which contains small icosahedral viruses with positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genomes (18). MNV is related to human noroviruses (HuNoV), which cause most of the sporadic cases and outbreaks of infectious nonbacterial gastroenteritis worldwide in people of all ages (4, 15, 28, 36, 38, 64). However, noroviruses are an understudied group of viruses due to the previous lack of a tissue culture system and small-animal model. Since its discovery in 2003 (23), MNV has become an increasingly important model to study norovirus biology (66). The availability of a small-animal model, cell culture, and reverse-genetics system, combined with many shared characteristics of human and murine noroviruses, allows detailed studies of norovirus biology (7, 23, 63, 65, 66).The norovirus genome is organized into 3 major open reading frames (ORFs), which encode the nonstructural polyprotein (∼200 kDa) and the major (VP1; ∼58-kDa) and minor (VP2; ∼20-kDa) capsid proteins (18). Recently, a putative ORF-4 was identified in MNV, but the existence of that product and its function remain unknown (60). Norovirus capsids are formed from 180 copies of VP1 arranged with T=3 icosahedral symmetry (9, 25, 46-48). Each capsid protein is divided into an N-terminal arm (N), a shell (S), and a C-terminal protruding (P) domain, with the last two domains connected by a short hinge. VP1 self-assembles into virus-like particles (VLPs) in baculovirus, mammalian, and plant expression systems (21, 22, 50, 57, 67). The S domain forms a smooth shell around the viral genome but is unable to bind to receptors (3, 55). The P domain dimerizes, forming arch-like structures on the capsid surface, and is subdivided into P1 (the stem of the arch) and P2 (the top of the arch) subdomains. The sequence of the P2 subdomain is the least conserved, followed by the P1 and S domains with the highest degree of conservation. While the S domain of Norwalk virus (NV) is required in order to form VLPs in a baculovirus expression system, the P domains contribute to stability by intermolecular interactions (3, 24). The homodimeric interactions of the HuNoV P domain, observed by crystallographic studies of VLPs, is retained when the protein region is expressed in a bacterial expression system (55). In addition, the norovirus P domain, specifically the P2 subdomain, contains the sites for antigenicity, immune-driven evolution, and cell binding (13a, 20, 25, 32, 41, 51, 56). For MNV-1, the Fab fragment of the neutralizing antibody A6.2 binds to the outermost tip of the P2 subdomain and is thought to prevent infection by blocking capsid-receptor interaction (25).Early steps in the norovirus life cycle are determinants of norovirus tropism (19) and thereby determine the outcome of a viral infection. While the tropism of HuNoV remains unknown, MNV-1 has a tropism for murine macrophages and dendritic cells in vitro and in vivo (62, 65). Recent studies from our laboratory demonstrated that MNV-1 binds to sialic acid on murine macrophages, in particular on the ganglioside GD1a (58). It subsequently enters murine macrophages and dendritic cells in a pH-independent manner (43). To better understand MNV-cell surface binding, we expressed, purified, and determined the high-resolution structure of the MNV-1 P domain at 2.0-Å resolution. Here, we show that, similar to HuNoV P domains (10, 55), recombinant MNV-1 P domains can be expressed and fold in a biologically correct manner. This was shown by the ability of the recombinant MNV-1 P domain to bind murine macrophages, to competitively inhibit MNV-1 infection, and to be recognized by the neutralizing antibody A6.2, which interferes with macrophage binding. Expressed P domain yielded different crystal forms with significant structural differences in the outermost loops of the P2 subdomains. Overall, the MNV-1 P-domain crystal structures show tertiary structures similar to those of HuNoV P domains, with the greatest structural variation in the polypeptide loops on the outer surface of the P domain corresponding to the mobile regions among the various crystal forms. In particular, one of these loops, E′-F′, was observed in “open” and “closed” conformations. Modeling of a Fab fragment and the crystal structures of the P domain into the cryoelectron microscopy three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the Fab/MNV-1 complex indicated that the “closed” conformation is the form likely being bound by the neutralizing antibody A6.2. Two sequences located in the A′-B′ and E′-F′ loops were identified as epitopes for A6.2. Biological support for the in silico modeling data comes from a recombinant MNV-1 in which amino acids of the Norwalk virus E′-F′ loop replaced those of MNV-1 and that was no longer neutralized by A6.2. We hypothesize that flexibility in the E′-F′ loop is important for virus-cell interaction and that A6.2 might sterically block viral binding to the cell surface and/or prevent structural changes in the viral capsid required during receptor interaction. In addition, a channel at the interphase of the P dimer was identified that is stabilized by an “ionic lock” (i.e., a bridge formed by two sets of opposing arginine and glutamic acid residues). We hypothesize that the ionic lock may act as a trigger for structural changes important during infection, possibly at the level of host cell entry. Together, these data identify several potential movements within the MNV-1 P domain, which points to the flexibility of the MNV-1 capsid.     

Endocytosis of Murine Norovirus 1 into Murine Macrophages Is Dependent on Dynamin II and Cholesterol

Although noroviruses cause the vast majority of nonbacterial gastroenteritis in humans, little is known about their life cycle, including viral entry. Murine norovirus (MNV) is the only norovirus to date that efficiently infects cells in culture. To elucidate the productive route of infection for MNV-1 into murine macrophages, we used a neutral red (NR) infectious center assay and pharmacological inhibitors in combination with dominant-negative (DN) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) constructs to show that clathrin- and caveolin-mediated endocytosis did not play a role in entry. In addition, we showed that phagocytosis or macropinocytosis, flotillin-1, and GRAF1 are not required for the major route of MNV-1 uptake. However, MNV-1 genome release occurred within 1 h, and endocytosis was significantly inhibited by the cholesterol-sequestering drugs nystatin and methyl-β-cyclodextrin, the dynamin-specific inhibitor dynasore, and the dominant-negative dynamin II mutant K44A. Therefore, we conclude that the productive route of MNV-1 entry into murine macrophages is rapid and requires host cholesterol and dynamin II.Murine noroviruses (MNV) are closely related to human noroviruses (HuNoV), the causative agent of most outbreaks of infectious nonbacterial gastroenteritis worldwide in people of all ages (4, 8, 19, 31, 43, 46, 83). Although a major public health concern, noroviruses have been an understudied group of viruses due to the lack of a tissue culture system and small animal model. Since the discovery of MNV-1 in 2003 (27), reverse genetics systems (10, 81), a cell culture model (84), and a small animal model (27) have provided the tools necessary for detailed study of noroviruses.One largely unexplored aspect of norovirus biology is the early events during viral infection that are essential during viral pathogenesis. One of these early events is the attachment of the virus particle to the host. Attachment is mediated by the protruding domain of the MNV-1 capsid (29, 30, 73). For at least three strains (MNV-1, WU-11, and S99), the attachment receptor on the cell surface of murine macrophages is terminal sialic acids, including those found on the ganglioside GD1a (72). The use of carbohydrate receptors for cell attachment is shared with HuNoV, which utilize mostly histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) (18, 34, 70, 71). These carbohydrates are present in body fluids (saliva, breast milk, and intestinal contents) and on the surface of red blood cells and intestinal epithelial cells (33). Some HuNoV strains also bind to sialic acid or heparan sulfate (60, 69). However, despite evidence that for HuNoV HBGA are a genetic susceptibility marker (35), the presence of attachment receptors is not sufficient for a productive infection for either HuNoV (24) or MNV-1 (72). Although the cellular tropism of HuNoV is unknown, MNV infects murine macrophages and dendritic cells in vitro and in vivo (80, 84). Following attachment, MNV-1 infection of murine macrophages and dendritic cells can proceed in the presence of the endosome acidification inhibitor chloroquine or bafilomycin A1, suggesting that MNV-1 entry occurs independently of endosomal pH (54). However, the cellular pathway(s) utilized by MNV-1 during entry remains unclear.Viruses are obligate intracellular pathogens that hijack cellular processes to deliver their genome into cells. The most commonly used endocytic pathway during virus entry is clathrin-mediated endocytosis (41). Clathrin-coated vesicles form at the plasma membrane, pinch off by the action of the small GTPase dynamin II, and deliver their contents to early endosomes (12). For example, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) enters cells in this manner (66). However, viruses can also use several clathrin-independent pathways to enter cells, some of which require cholesterol-rich microdomains (i.e., lipid rafts) in the plasma membrane (56). The best studied of these is mediated by caveolin and was initially elucidated through studies of simian virus 40 (SV40) entry (1). SV40 uptake occurs via caveolin-containing vesicles that are released from the plasma membrane in a dynamin II-dependent manner and later fuse with pH-neutral caveosomes (28, 48, 53). Although caveolin-mediated endocytosis is a well-characterized form of cholesterol-dependent endocytosis, other entry mechanisms exist that are clathrin and caveolin independent (5, 14, 55, 57-59, 64, 78). In addition, macropinocytosis and/or phagocytosis can also play a role in viral entry (11, 13, 21, 36, 40, 42, 44, 45). However, the requirement for dynamin II in these processes is not fully understood.Viral entry has been addressed primarily by pharmacologic inhibitor studies, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, transfections of dominant-negative (DN) constructs, and more recently by small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown. Each of these approaches has some limitations; thus, a combination of approaches is needed to elucidate the mechanism of viral entry into host cells. For example, using electron and fluorescence microscopy, which require a high particle number, does not allow the differentiation of infectious and noninfectious particles. Alternatively, the use of pharmacological inhibitors can result in off-target effects, including cytotoxicity. A recent approach used the photoreactive dye neutral red (NR) in an infectious focus assay to determine the mechanism of poliovirus entry (6). Cells were infected in the dark in the presence of neutral red, and virus particles passively incorporated the dye. Upon exposure to light, the neutral red dye cross-linked the viral genome to the viral capsid, thus inactivating the virus. Infectious foci were counted several days later. This assay was performed in the presence of various pharmacologic inhibitors of endocytosis. When an inhibitor blocked a productive route of infection, the number of infectious foci was significantly less than that for an untreated control. Major advantages of this technique over traditional assays are the ability to treat cells with pharmacologic inhibitors only during the viral entry process, the reduction of cytotoxicity, and the ability to infect with a low multiplicity of infection (MOI). Furthermore, infectious virus that is prohibited from uncoating is inactivated by illumination. Therefore, only virus particles leading to a productive infection in the presence or absence of the various inhibitors are measured. We successfully adapted this assay for use with MNV-1. Together with the use of pharmacological inhibitors, DN constructs, and siRNA knockdown, we demonstrate that the major MNV-1 entry pathway into murine macrophages resulting in a productive infection occurred by endocytosis and not phagocytosis or macropinocytosis in a manner that was clathrin and caveolin 1, flotillin 1, and GRAF1 independent but required dynamin II and cholesterol.     

Genetic Diversity and Histo-Blood Group Antigen Interactions of Rhesus Enteric Caliciviruses

Recently, we reported the discovery and characterization of Tulane virus (TV), a novel rhesus calicivirus (CV) (T. Farkas, K. Sestak, C. Wei, and X. Jiang, J. Virol. 82:5408-5416, 2008). TV grows well in tissue culture, and it represents a new genus within Caliciviridae, with the proposed name of Recovirus. We also reported a high prevalence of CV antibodies in macaques of the Tulane National Primate Research Center (TNPRC) colony, including anti-norovirus (NoV), anti-sapovirus (SaV), and anti-TV (T. Farkas, J. Dufour, X. Jiang, and K. Sestak, J. Gen. Virol. 91:734-738, 2010). To broaden our knowledge about CV infections in captive nonhuman primates (NHP), 500 rhesus macaque stool samples collected from breeding colony TNPRC macaques were tested for CVs. Fifty-seven (11%) samples contained recovirus isolates. In addition, one NoV was detected. Phylogenetic analysis classified the recovirus isolates into two genogroups and at least four genetic types. The rhesus NoV isolate was closely related to GII human NoVs. TV-neutralizing antibodies were detected in 88% of serum samples obtained from primate caretakers. Binding and plaque reduction assays revealed the involvement of type A and B histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) in TV infection. Taken together, these findings indicate the zoonotic potential of primate CVs. The discovery of a genetically diverse and prevalent group of primate CVs and remarkable similarities between rhesus enteric CVs and human NoVs opens new possibilities for research involving in vitro and in vivo models of human NoV gastroenteritis.Caliciviruses (CV) are important human and animal pathogens, causing a wide variety of diseases in their respective hosts. The family Caliciviridae consists of five established genera (Norovirus, Sapovirus, Lagovirus, Vesivirus, and Nebovirus). Recently, two new calicivirus genera have been proposed, represented by the Tulane virus (Recovirus) and the St. Valerien-like viruses (Valovirus) (11-13, 24, 36, 37, 39).NoVs are recognized as the leading cause of epidemics of gastroenteritis (GE), causing 80 to 90% of nonbacterial GE outbreaks and more than 50% of all food-related GE outbreaks (7, 8, 29). They are also an important cause of sporadic GE in both children and adults. Based on phylogenetic analysis, NoVs are divided into five genogroups and more than 30 genetic clusters or genotypes (9, 46). This high genetic and, likely, antigenic variation, combined with the lack of a tissue culture or animal model, represent major obstacles for NoV research.NoVs with close genetic and antigenic relatedness to human NoVs have been isolated from various animal species (6, 28, 33, 41). This not only provided opportunities for using some of these viruses as surrogates for human NoV research (44) but also raised the concern of the possible zoonotic nature of CV gastroenteritis.Based on results of in vitro binding assays, volunteer challenge studies, and the analysis of NoV outbreaks, it was proposed that histo-blood group antigens (HBGA), including the ABO, Lewis, and secretor-type HBGAs, function as the NoV receptors (17, 19, 20, 27, 32). The involvement of other host factors in NoV replication and susceptibility to infection also has been implicated (14, 43).Previously, we reported the isolation and characterization of a novel CV (Tulane virus; TV) from stool samples of juvenile rhesus macaques (11). TV represents a newly proposed genus (Recovirus) within Caliciviridae that phylogenetically shares a common origin with NoVs; however, TV can be grown in tissue culture (11). We also reported a high prevalence of anti-NoV, anti-SaV binding, and anti-TV-neutralizing (VN) antibodies in colony macaques, suggesting that CV infections are frequent in captive nonhuman primates (NHP) (10). The few NoV challenge studies conducted also suggest that NHPs are susceptible to NoV infection. Chimpanzees inoculated with the Norwalk virus developed seroresponses and virus shedding but without the manifestation of clinical disease (45). Subekti et al. reported the development of clinical illness characterized by diarrhea, dehydration, vomiting, and virus shedding in newborn pigtail macaques inoculated with the Toronto virus (40). In a study conducted by Rockx et al., one of the three rhesus macaques infected with Norwalk virus developed virus-specific IgM and IgG responses and shed the virus for 19 days postinoculation (38). To date, however, direct evidence of natural NoV or SaV infection in NHPs is missing. Moreover, the prevalence and genetic diversity of recoviruses have yet to be studied.In this study, we undertook the molecular detection and genetic analysis of CVs circulating in colony macaques and examined the role of HBGAs in recovirus infection.     

Investigation of Clade B New World Arenavirus Tropism by Using Chimeric GP1 Proteins

Clade B of the New World arenaviruses contains both pathogenic and nonpathogenic members, whose surface glycoproteins (GPs) are characterized by different abilities to use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) protein as a receptor. Using closely related pairs of pathogenic and nonpathogenic viruses, we investigated the determinants of the GP1 subunit that confer these different characteristics. We identified a central region (residues 85 to 221) in the Guanarito virus GP1 that was sufficient to interact with hTfR1, with residues 159 to 221 being essential. The recently solved structure of part of the Machupo virus GP1 suggests an explanation for these requirements.Arenaviruses are bisegmented, single-stranded RNA viruses that use an ambisense coding strategy to express four proteins: NP (nucleoprotein), Z (matrix protein), L (polymerase), and GP (glycoprotein). The viral GP is sufficient to direct entry into host cells, and retroviral vectors pseudotyped with GP recapitulate the entry pathway of these viruses (5, 13, 24, 31). GP is a class I fusion protein comprising two subunits, GP1 and GP2, cleaved from the precursor protein GPC (4, 14, 16, 18, 21). GP1 contains the receptor binding domain (19, 28), while GP2 contains structural elements characteristic of viral membrane fusion proteins (8, 18, 20, 38). The N-terminal stable signal peptide (SSP) remains associated with the mature glycoprotein after cleavage (2, 39) and plays a role in transport, maturation, and pH-dependent fusion (17, 35, 36, 37).The New World arenaviruses are divided into clades A, B, and C based on phylogenetic relatedness (7, 9, 11). Clade B contains the human pathogenic viruses Junin (JUNV), Machupo (MACV), Guanarito (GTOV), Sabia, and Chapare, which cause severe hemorrhagic fevers in South America (1, 10, 15, 26, 34). Clade B also contains the nonpathogenic viruses Amapari (AMAV), Cupixi, and Tacaribe (TCRV), although mild disease has been reported for a laboratory worker infected with TCRV (29).Studies with both viruses and GP-pseudotyped retroviral vectors have shown that the pathogenic clade B arenaviruses use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) to gain entry into human cells (19, 30). In contrast, GPs from nonpathogenic viruses, although capable of using TfR1 orthologs from other species (1), cannot use hTfR1 (1, 19) and instead enter human cells through as-yet-uncharacterized hTfR1-independent pathways (19). In addition, human T-cell lines serve as useful tools to distinguish these GPs, since JUNV, GTOV, and MACV pseudotyped vectors readily transduce CEM cells, while TCRV and AMAV GP vectors do not (27; also unpublished data). These properties of the GPs do not necessarily reflect a tropism of the pathogenic viruses for human T cells, since viral tropism is influenced by many factors and T cells are not a target for JUNV replication in vivo (3, 22, 25).     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

A Targeted Analysis of Cellular Chaperones Reveals Contrasting Roles for Heat Shock Protein 70 in Flock House Virus RNA Replication

Cytosolic chaperones are a diverse group of ubiquitous proteins that play central roles in multiple processes within the cell, including protein translation, folding, intracellular trafficking, and quality control. These cellular proteins have also been implicated in the replication of numerous viruses, although the full extent of their involvement in viral replication is unknown. We have previously shown that the heat shock protein 40 (hsp40) chaperone encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates RNA replication of flock house virus (FHV), a well-studied and versatile positive-sense RNA model virus. To further explore the roles of chaperones in FHV replication, we examined a panel of 30 yeast strains with single deletions of cytosolic proteins that have known or hypothesized chaperone activity. We found that the majority of cytosolic chaperone deletions had no impact on FHV RNA accumulation, with the notable exception of J-domain-containing hsp40 chaperones, where deletion of APJ1 reduced FHV RNA accumulation by 60%, while deletion of ZUO1, JJJ1, or JJJ2 markedly increased FHV RNA accumulation, by 4- to 40-fold. Further studies using cross complementation and double-deletion strains revealed that the contrasting effects of J domain proteins were reproduced by altering expression of the major cytosolic hsp70s encoded by the SSA and SSB families and were mediated in part by divergent effects on FHV RNA polymerase synthesis. These results identify hsp70 chaperones as critical regulators of FHV RNA replication and indicate that cellular chaperones can have both positive and negative regulatory effects on virus replication.The compact genomes of viruses relative to those of other infectious agents restrict their ability to encode all proteins required to complete their replication cycles. To circumvent this limitation, viruses often utilize cellular factors or processes to complete essential steps in replication. One group of cellular proteins frequently targeted by viruses are cellular chaperones, which include a diverse set of heat shock proteins (hsps) that normally facilitate cellular protein translation, folding, trafficking, and degradation (18, 64). The connection between viruses and cellular chaperones was originally identified in bacteria, where the Escherichia coli hsp40 and hsp70 homologues, encoded by dnaJ and dnaK, respectively, were identified as bacterial genes essential for bacteriophage λ DNA replication (62). Research over the past 30 years has further revealed the importance of cellular chaperones in viral replication, such that the list of virus-hsp connections is now quite extensive and includes viruses from numerous families with diverse genome structures (4, 6, 7, 16, 19, 20, 23, 25, 40, 41, 44, 51, 54, 60). These studies have demonstrated the importance of cellular chaperones in multiple steps of the viral life cycle, including entry, viral protein translation, genome replication, encapsidation, and virion release. However, the list of virus-hsp connections is likely incomplete. Further studies to explore this particular host-pathogen interaction will shed light on virus replication mechanisms and pathogenesis, and potentially highlight targets for novel antiviral agents.To study the role of cellular chaperones in the genome replication of positive-sense RNA viruses, we use flock house virus (FHV), a natural insect pathogen and well-studied member of the Nodaviridae family. The FHV life cycle shares many common features with other positive-sense RNA viruses, including the membrane-specific targeting and assembly of functional RNA replication complexes (37, 38), the exploitation of various cellular processes and host factors for viral replication (5, 23, 60), and the induction of large-scale membrane rearrangements (24, 28, 38, 39). FHV virions contain a copackaged bipartite genome consisting of RNA1 (3.1 kb) and RNA2 (1.4 kb), which encode protein A, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and the structural capsid protein precursor, respectively (1). During active genome replication, FHV produces a subgenomic RNA3 (0.4 kb), which encodes the RNA interference inhibitor protein B2 (12, 29, 32). These viral characteristics make FHV an excellent model system to study many aspects of positive-sense RNA virus biology.In addition to the benefits of a simple genome, FHV is able to establish robust RNA replication in a wide variety of genetically tractable eukaryotic hosts, including Drosophila melanogaster (38), Caenorhabditis elegans (32), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (46). The budding yeast S. cerevisiae has been an exceptionally useful model host to study the mechanisms of viral RNA replication complex assembly and function with FHV (31, 37, 39, 45, 53, 55, 56, 60) as well as other positive-sense RNA viruses (11). The facile genetics of S. cerevisiae, along with the vast array of well-defined cellular and molecular tools and techniques, make it an ideal eukaryotic host for the identification of cellular factors required for positive-sense RNA virus replication. Furthermore, readily available yeast libraries with deletions and regulated expression of individual proteins have led to the completion of several high-throughput screens to provide a global survey of host factors that impact virus replication (26, 42, 52). An alternative approach with these yeast libraries that reduces the inherently high false-negative rates associated with high-throughput screens is to focus on a select set of host genes associated with a particular cellular pathway, process, or location previously implicated in virus replication.We have utilized such a targeted approach and focused on examining the impact of cytosolic chaperones on FHV RNA replication. Previously, we have shown that the cellular chaperone hsp90 facilitates protein A synthesis in Drosophila cells (5, 23), and the hsp40 encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates FHV RNA replication in yeast, in part through effects on both protein A accumulation and function (60). In this report, we further extend these observations by examining FHV RNA accumulation in a panel of yeast strains with deletions of known or hypothesized cytosolic chaperones. We demonstrate that cytosolic chaperones can have either suppressive or enhancing effects on FHV RNA accumulation. In particular, related hsp70 members encoded by the SSA and SSB yeast chaperone families have marked and dramatically divergent effects on both genomic and subgenomic RNA accumulation and viral polymerase synthesis. These results highlight the complexities of the host-pathogen interactions that influence positive-sense RNA virus replication and identify the hsp70 family of cytosolic chaperones as key regulators of FHV replication.     

Primary High-Dose Murine Norovirus 1 Infection Fails To Protect from Secondary Challenge with Homologous Virus

Human noroviruses in the Caliciviridae family are the major cause of nonbacterial epidemic gastroenteritis worldwide. Primary human norovirus infection does not elicit lasting protective immunity, a fact that could greatly affect the efficacy of vaccination strategies. Little is known regarding the pathogenesis of human noroviruses or the immune responses that control them because there has previously been no small-animal model or cell culture system of infection. Using the only available small-animal model of norovirus infection, we found that primary high-dose murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1) infection fails to afford protection against a rechallenge with a homologous virus. Thus, MNV-1 represents a valuable model with which to dissect the pathophysiological basis for the lack of lasting protection against human norovirus infection. Interestingly, the magnitude of protection afforded by a primary MNV-1 infection inversely correlates with the inoculum dose. Future studies will elucidate the mechanisms by which noroviruses avoid the induction of protective immunity and the role played by the inoculum dose in this process, ultimately translating this knowledge into successful vaccination approaches.Human noroviruses (NVs) are estimated to be responsible for >95% of the nonbacterial epidemic gastroenteritis that occurs worldwide. The course of the disease is rapid, with symptoms including vomiting, diarrhea, and nausea arising approximately 24 h following infection and typically resolving 24 to 48 h later. NV outbreaks occur most commonly in semiclosed communities such as nursing homes, schools, hospitals, cruise ships, and military settings (11, 24, 31). Persons of all ages are susceptible to NV infection. Human NVs are thus associated with considerable morbidity and have a significant economic impact. Numerous human volunteer challenge studies have demonstrated that long-term immunity is not induced following primary NV infection of some volunteers (13, 20, 26). The pathophysiological basis for this lack of protection is unclear, since virus-specific adaptive immune responses are generated (1, 7, 9, 10). A similar lack of immunity has been observed in some individuals for a number of other viral pathogens that infect at mucosal surfaces, such as rhinoviruses (32) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (16). Importantly, typical vaccination strategies have been unsuccessful at eliciting protective anti-RSV immunity and studies with animal models to understand the lack of immunity to either natural or vaccinating virus have been uninformative because protection is induced in animals (27). Extrapolating from RSV studies, it may be difficult to vaccinate against NVs and it will be important to understand the underlying cause in order to design more efficacious treatment regimens. Studies with a small-animal model recapitulating this atypical immune outcome would be extremely valuable.     

Complementation of a Herpes Simplex Virus ICP0 Null Mutant by Varicella-Zoster Virus ORF61p

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) ICP0 protein acts to overcome intrinsic cellular defenses that repress viral α gene expression. In that vein, viruses that have mutations in ICP0''s RING finger or are deleted for the gene are sensitive to interferon, as they fail to direct degradation of promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML), a component of host nuclear domain 10s. While varicella-zoster virus is also insensitive to interferon, ORF61p, its ICP0 ortholog, failed to degrade PML. A recombinant virus with each coding region of the gene for ICP0 replaced with sequences encoding ORF61p was constructed. This virus was compared to an ICP0 deletion mutant and wild-type HSV. The recombinant degraded only Sp100 and not PML and grew to higher titers than its ICP0 null parental virus, but it was sensitive to interferon, like the virus from which it was derived. This analysis permitted us to compare the activities of ICP0 and ORF61p in identical backgrounds and revealed distinct biologic roles for these proteins.Alphaherpesviruses encode orthologs of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) α gene product ICP0. ICP0 is a nuclear phosphoprotein that behaves as a promiscuous activator of viral and cellular genes (7, 11, 28, 29). ICP0 also functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to target several host proteins for proteasomal degradation (4, 10, 11, 16, 26). Through this activity, ICP0 promotes degradation of components of nuclear domain 10 (ND10) bodies, including the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and Sp100. These proteins are implicated in silencing of herpesvirus genomes (9, 10, 22, 34). Therefore, ICP0-mediated degradation of ND10 components may disrupt silencing of HSV genes to enable efficient gene expression. This hypothesis provides a plausible mechanistic explanation of how ICP0 induces gene activation.Introduction of DNA encoding the ICP0 orthologs from HSV, bovine herpesvirus, equine herpesvirus, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can also affect nuclear structures and proteins (27). In addition, and more specific to this report, ORF61p, the VZV ortholog, activates viral promoters and enhances infectivity of viral DNA like ICP0, the prototype for this gene family (24, 25). However, we have previously demonstrated two key biological differences between the HSV and VZV orthologs. We first showed that unlike ICP0, ORF61p is unable to complement depletion of BAG3, a host cochaperone protein. As a result, VZV is affected by silencing of BAG3 (15), whereas growth of HSV is altered only when ICP0 is not expressed (17). Furthermore, we have shown that while both proteins target components of ND10s, expression of ICP0 results in degradation of both PML and Sp100, whereas ORF61p specifically reduces Sp100 levels (16). These findings suggest that these proteins have evolved separately to provide different functions for virus replication.Virus mutants lacking the ICP0 gene have an increased particle-to-PFU ratio, a substantially lower yield, and decreased levels of α gene expression, in a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI)- and cell-type-dependent manner (2, 4, 8, 33). These mutants are also defective at degrading ND10 components (23). Depletion of PML and Sp100 accelerates virus gene expression and increases plaquing efficiency of HSV ICP0-defective viruses but has no effect on wild-type virus, suggesting that PML and Sp100 are components of an intrinsic anti-HSV defense mechanism that is counteracted by ICP0''s E3 ligase activity (9, 10). Interestingly, ICP0 null viruses are also hypersensitive to interferon (IFN) (26), a property that was suggested to be mediated via PML (3).To directly compare the activities of the two orthologs, we constructed an HSV mutant virus that expresses ORF61p in place of ICP0. The resulting chimeric virus only partially rescues the ICP0 null phenotype. Our studies emphasize the biological differences between ICP0 and ORF61p and shed light on the requirements for PML and Sp100 during infection.     

Induction and Inhibition of Type I Interferon Responses by Distinct Components of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus

Type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in the host defense against viruses. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection induces robust type I IFN production in its natural host, the mouse. However, the mechanisms underlying the induction of type I IFNs in response to LCMV infection have not yet been clearly defined. In the present study, we demonstrate that IRF7 is required for both the early phase (day 1 postinfection) and the late phase (day 2 postinfection) of the type I IFN response to LCMV, and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)/mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) signaling is crucial for the late phase of the type I IFN response to LCMV. We further demonstrate that LCMV genomic RNA itself (without other LCMV components) is able to induce type I IFN responses in various cell types by activation of the RNA helicases retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and MDA5. We also show that expression of the LCMV nucleoprotein (NP) inhibits the type I IFN response induced by LCMV RNA and other RIG-I/MDA5 ligands. These virus-host interactions may play important roles in the pathogeneses of LCMV and other human arenavirus diseases.Type I interferons (IFNs), namely, alpha interferon (IFN-α) and IFN-β, are not only essential for host innate defense against viral pathogens but also critically modulate the development of virus-specific adaptive immune responses (6, 8, 28, 30, 36, 50, 61). The importance of type I IFNs in host defense has been demonstrated by studying mice deficient in the type I IFN receptor, which are highly susceptible to most viral pathogens (2, 47, 62).Recent studies have suggested that the production of type I IFNs is controlled by different innate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (19, 32, 55, 60). There are three major classes of PRRs, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (3, 40), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) (25, 48, 51), and nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (9, 22). TLRs are a group of transmembrane proteins expressed on either cell surfaces or endosomal compartments. RLRs localize in the cytosol. Both TLRs and RLRs are involved in detecting viral pathogens and controlling the production of type I IFNs (52, 60). In particular, the endosome-localized TLRs (TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9) play important roles in detecting virus-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), and DNA-containing unmethylated CpG motifs, respectively. In contrast, RIG-I detects virus-derived ssRNA with 5′-triphosphates (5′-PPPs) or short dsRNA (<1 kb), whereas melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) is responsible for recognizing virus-derived long dsRNA as well as a synthetic mimic of viral dsRNA poly(I):poly(C) [poly(I·C)] (24, 60). Recognition of viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) ultimately leads to the activation and nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), which, in turn, switches on a cascade of genes controlling the production of both type I IFNs and other proinflammatory cytokines (10, 11, 60).Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection in its natural host, the mouse, is an excellent system to study the impact of virus-host interactions on viral pathogenesis and to address important issues related to human viral diseases (1, 45, 49, 67). LCMV infection induces type I IFNs as well as other proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines (6, 41). Our previous studies have demonstrated that TLR2, TLR6, and CD14 are involved in LCMV-induced proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines (66). The mechanism by which LCMV induces type I IFN responses, however, has not been clearly defined (7, 8, 31, 44). The role of the helicase family members RIG-I and MDA5 in virus-induced type I IFN responses has been recently established. RIG-I has been found to be critical in controlling the production of type I IFN in response to a number of RNA viruses, including influenza virus, rabies virus, Hantaan virus, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Sendai virus (SeV), etc. In contrast, MDA5 is required for responses to picornaviruses (15, 25, 63).In the present study, we demonstrated that LCMV genomic RNA strongly activates type I IFNs through a RIG-I/MDA5-dependent signaling pathway. Our present study further demonstrated that the LCMV nucleoprotein (NP) blocks LCMV RNA- and other viral ligand-induced type I IFN responses.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Mediates Retrograde Spread from Epithelial Cells to Neurites

In animal models of infection, glycoprotein E (gE) is required for efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (retrograde direction). Retrograde spread in vivo is a multistep process, in that HSV-1 first spreads between epithelial cells at the inoculation site, then infects neurites, and finally travels by retrograde axonal transport to the neuron cell body. To better understand the role of gE in retrograde spread, we used a compartmentalized neuron culture system, in which neurons were infected in the presence or absence of epithelial cells. We found that gE-deleted HSV-1 (NS-gEnull) retained retrograde axonal transport activity when added directly to neurites, in contrast to the retrograde spread defect of this virus in animals. To better mimic the in vivo milieu, we overlaid neurites with epithelial cells prior to infection. In this modified system, virus infects epithelial cells and then spreads to neurites, revealing a 100-fold retrograde spread defect for NS-gEnull. We measured the retrograde spread defect of NS-gEnull from a variety of epithelial cell lines and found that the magnitude of the spread defect from epithelial cells to neurons correlated with epithelial cell plaque size defect, indicating that gE plays a similar role in both types of spread. Therefore, gE-mediated spread between epithelial cells and neurites likely explains the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in vivo.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an alphaherpesvirus that characteristically infects skin and mucosal surfaces before spreading to sensory neurons, where it establishes a lifelong persistent infection. The virus periodically returns to the periphery via sensory axons and causes recurrent lesions as well as asymptomatic shedding. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions: toward the neuron cell body (retrograde direction) and away from the neuron cell body (anterograde direction).Many studies of alphaherpesvirus neuronal spread have focused on pseudorabies virus (PRV), a virus whose natural host is the pig. Three PRV proteins, glycoprotein E (gE), gI, and Us9, have been shown to mediate anterograde neuronal spread both in animal models of infection and in cultured neurons. However, these three proteins are dispensable for retrograde spread (3, 8, 11, 12, 31, 46). In contrast, numerous animal models of infection have shown that HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (4, 9, 44, 56). In the murine flank model, wild-type (WT) virus replicates in the skin and then infects sensory neurons and spreads in a retrograde direction to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In this model, gE-deleted HSV-1 replicates in the skin but is not detected in the DRG (9, 44). This phenotype differs from gE-deleted PRV, which is able to reach the DRG at WT levels (8). Thus, unlike PRV, gE-deleted HSV-1 viruses have a retrograde spread defect in vivo.HSV-1 gE is a 552-amino-acid type I membrane protein found in the virion membrane as well as in the trans-Golgi and plasma membranes of infected cells (1). gE forms a heterodimer with another viral glycoprotein, gI. The gE/gI complex is important for HSV-1 immune evasion through its Fc receptor activity. gE/gI binds to the Fc domain of antibodies directed against other viral proteins, sequestering these antibodies and blocking antibody effector functions (27, 32, 40). Additionally, gE/gI promotes spread between epithelial cells. Viruses lacking either gE or gI form characteristically small plaques in cell culture and small inoculation site lesions in mice (4, 9, 18, 40, 58). In animal models, gE and gI also mediate viral spread in both anterograde and retrograde directions (4, 19, 44, 56).In order to better understand the role of gE in HSV-1 retrograde neuronal spread, we employed a compartmentalized neuron culture system that has been used to study directional neuronal spread of PRV and West Nile virus (12, 14, 45). In the Campenot chamber system, neurites are contained in a compartment that is separate from their corresponding cell bodies. Therefore, spread in an exclusively retrograde direction can be measured by infecting neurites and detecting spread to neuron cell bodies.HSV-1 replication requires retrograde transport of incoming viral genomes to the nucleus. In neurites, fusion between viral and cellular membranes occurs at the plasma membrane (43, 48). Upon membrane fusion, the capsid and a subset of tegument proteins (the inner tegument) dissociate from glycoproteins and outer tegument proteins, which remain at the plasma membrane (28, 38). Unenveloped capsids and the associated inner tegument proteins are then transported in the retrograde direction to the nucleus (7, 48, 49).For both neurons and epithelial cells, retrograde transport is dependent upon microtubules, ATP, the retrograde microtubule motor dynein, and the dynein cofactor dynactin (22, 34, 49, 52). Several viral proteins interact with components of the dynein motor complex (23, 39, 60). However, none of these proteins suggest a completely satisfactory mechanism by which viral retrograde transport occurs, either because they are not components of the complex that is transported to the nucleus (UL34, UL9, VP11/12) or because capsids lacking that protein retain retrograde transport activity (VP26) (2, 17, 21, 28, 37). This implies that additional viral proteins are involved in retrograde trafficking.We sought to better characterize the role of gE in retrograde spread and found that gE is dispensable for retrograde axonal transport; however, it promotes HSV-1 spread from epithelial cells to neurites. This epithelial cell-to-neuron spread defect provides a plausible explanation for the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in animal models of infection.     

The Open Reading Frame 3a Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus Promotes Membrane Rearrangement and Cell Death

The genome of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) contains eight open reading frames (ORFs) that encode novel proteins. These accessory proteins are dispensable for in vitro and in vivo replication and thus may be important for other aspects of virus-host interactions. We investigated the functions of the largest of the accessory proteins, the ORF 3a protein, using a 3a-deficient strain of SARS-CoV. Cell death of Vero cells after infection with SARS-CoV was reduced upon deletion of ORF 3a. Electron microscopy of infected cells revealed a role for ORF 3a in SARS-CoV induced vesicle formation, a prominent feature of cells from SARS patients. In addition, we report that ORF 3a is both necessary and sufficient for SARS-CoV-induced Golgi fragmentation and that the 3a protein accumulates and localizes to vesicles containing markers for late endosomes. Finally, overexpression of ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), a small GTPase essential for the maintenance of the Golgi apparatus, restored Golgi morphology during infection. These results establish an important role for ORF 3a in SARS-CoV-induced cell death, Golgi fragmentation, and the accumulation of intracellular vesicles.The severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) genome encodes several smaller open reading frames (ORFs) located in the 3′ region of the genome that are predicted to express eight novel proteins termed accessory proteins. The accessory proteins are designated ORFs 3a, 3b, 6, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b, and 9b and range in size from 39 to 274 amino acids (35, 50). These SARS-CoV-specific ORFs are not present in other coronaviruses and do not display significant homology with any known proteins in the NCBI database. Five of these are predicted to code for polypeptides of greater than 50 amino acids (35, 50). Antibodies reactive against all of the SARS-CoV proteins have been detected in sera isolated from SARS patients, indicating that these proteins are expressed by the virus in vivo (7, 9, 17-19, 45, 59). Expression of three of the ORF proteins has been demonstrated during infection using protein-specific antibodies and include the ORFs 3a, 6, and 7a (12, 37, 41, 60). Six of the eight group-specific ORFs, including ORFs 3a, 3b, 6, 7a, 7b, and 9b, were deleted from recombinant SARS-CoV and shown to be dispensable for in vitro and in vivo replication (66).Related coronaviruses also encode unique accessory proteins in the 3′ region of the genome, often referred to as group-specific ORFs. Similar to SARS-CoV, several of these proteins are dispensable for viral replication. Murine hepatitis virus (MHV) expresses accessory proteins ORFs 2a, 4, and 5a. A recombinant virus in which ORF 2a was deleted replicated normally in vitro but caused attenuated disease in vivo (55). Deletion of the group-specific ORF 7 in porcine coronavirus TGEV also results in reduced replication and virulence in vivo despite normal replication in vitro (38). Similarly, in feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV), group-specific proteins are dispensable for replication in cell culture but contribute to pathogenesis in vivo (20). Thus, while the SARS-CoV group specific proteins are unnecessary for in vitro and in vivo replication, their expression may underlie the devastating pathology associated with SARS disease. Detailed characterization of these novel proteins may contribute to a better understanding of SARS pathogenesis and host-virus interactions.The ORF 3a protein is expressed from subgenomic RNA3, which contains the 3a and 3b ORFs (35, 50). The 3a protein, which is the largest group-specific SARS-CoV accessory protein at 274 amino acids, has been reported to localize to the Golgi apparatus, the plasma membrane, and intracellular vesicles of unknown origin (67, 68). The protein is efficiently transported to the cell surface and is also internalized during the process of endocytosis (60).The mechanism of SARS-CoV-induced cell death has been investigated by several groups. Studies to date have used overexpression of individual SARS-CoV ORFs to evaluate their intrinsic cytotoxicity. Using this approach, the following proteins have been reported to cause apoptosis: the 3CL-like protease; spike; ORFs 3a, 3b, and 7a; and the envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins (23, 31, 32, 36, 46, 58, 61, 65, 69). However, since all of these reports utilize overexpression of individual proteins, it is unclear whether these effects may be attributable to high, nonphysiological levels of protein and whether they occur during infection. Analysis of recombinant viruses with specific mutations or deletions is necessary to determine the relative contribution of these proteins to the cytotoxicity of SARS-CoV during infection (63). Therefore, the cytotoxic component(s) of SARS-CoV have not been fully defined.Here, we have investigated the function of the ORF 3a protein in the context of SARS-CoV infection and by overexpression. We confirm that ORF 3a contributes to SARS-CoV cytotoxicity using a recombinant strain deficient for expression of ORF 3a. While characterizing this deficient strain, we observed that SARS-CoV-induced vesicle formation, a feature that has been documented in cells from infected SARS patients, is dependent on ORF 3a. Furthermore, we observed that SARS-CoV infection causes Golgi fragmentation by ORF 3a. Additional characterization of 3a in transfected cells revealed that the protein colocalizes with markers of the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and late endosomal pathways and causes an accumulation of these vesicles. Finally, we report that Arf1 overexpression rescued SARS-CoV or 3a-induced Golgi fragmentation, suggesting that the ORF 3a protein may perturb Arf1-mediated vesicle trafficking.