Adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer in the era of aromatase inhibitors: an update

There is overwhelming evidence that optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone sensitive breast cancer in postmenopausal women should include a third generation aromatase inhibitor (AI). On current evidence, adjuvant anstrozole or letrozole should be used upfront in such patients especially in those with high risk disease (node positive and/or tumours > 2 cm). The sequential approach of tamoxifen for 2–3 years followed by exemestane or anastrozole for 2–3 years is a reasonable alternative to 5 years of AI monotherapy in patients with low risk disease (node negative and tumour smaller than 2 cm) especially if the tumour is positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors.Node-positive patients completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen should be offered letrozole for up 48 months. Further research is required to establish the long-term cardiovascular safety of AIs especially that of letrozole and exmestane, the optimal AI to use, duration of AI therapy and whether monotherapy with an AI for 5 years is superior to sequencing an AI after 2–3 years of tamoxifen.The bone mineral density (BMD) should be measured at baseline and monitored during therapy in women being treated with AIs. Anti-osteoporosis agents should such as bisphosphonates should be considered in patients at high risk of bone fractures.     

Adjuvant BCG immunotherapy for stage I and II malignant melanoma.

Initial adjuvant immunotherapy trials have demonstrated a greater disease-free interval in patients treated with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) compared with historical controls. In this study 149 patients at high risk of recurrence after surgical treatment of local or regional malignant melanoma were given BCG for 2 years and were followed up for a median of 28 months from the start of immunotherapy. The 36 patients in the comparison group had a higher rate of recurrence than the patients treated with BCG, and the rate in the treatment group was close to that reported from a similar study at the University of California at Los Angeles. The relatively long disease-free interval for the high-risk comparison patients in this study suggests that the control groups at other centres may have included patients with unrecognized additional risk. The rates of survival in the Canadian treatment group were also comparable to those reported by other centres. However, reports of a favourable BCG-mediated pattern of recurrence could not be confirmed. Therefore, the routine use of adjuvant BCG immunotherapy is not recommended.     

Detection and significance of minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer death in the developed world. Although the primary treatment for CRC is surgical, disease relapse due to minimal residual disease (MRD) following apparently curative surgery occurs in up to fifty percent of patients. Most patients who develop overt metastases beyond the regional lymph nodes eventually die of the disease. At present adjuvant chemotherapy is used to improve survival in patients with metastases to regional lymph nodes demonstrated by routine histopathology with no other evidence of spread. The ability to identify metastatic disease at an earlier stage could be of considerable benefit in directing adjuvant therapy to patients at high risk of relapse who are not identified by current methods. Several techniques have been developed for the detection of MRD, including immunohistochemical and molecular methods, however their role in clinical practise is not yet established. The purpose of this paper is to review these techniques and their potential clinical use in the management of CRC.     

Adjuvant Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Surgical operation remains the most effective method of treatment for patients with cancer of the large bowel. However, innovative surgical techniques have not improved survival rates for colorectal cancer in 25 years.Attempts at increasing survival with chemotherapy as an adjunct to surgical procedures remain inconclusive and controversial. Many adjuvant chemotherapy trials have failed to recognize those prognostic factors—such as nodal involvement, serosal penetration, vascular or perineural invasion, and microscopic invasion at margins of resection—that characterize certain patients at high risk for recurrent cancer. Failure to include only high risk patients in adjuvant chemotherapy is, in part, responsible for the lackluster performance to date.For rectal cancer, preoperative irradiation increases the chances of cure with surgical operation by reduction of pathologic staging, but it has not increased survival in patients with persistent nodal involvement.Immunotherapy is a possibly valuable method of treatment; however, it is clinically untested. An adjuvant immunotherapy protocol for high risk patients is described.     

Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in axillary node-negative breast cancer

The question of which node-negative breast cancer patients should be treated with adjuvant systemic therapy is a debatable topic. Our approach in San Antonio is to examine the risk profile for an individual patient and attempt to classify the patient into a good risk group or a high risk group in terms of disease recurrence. Features such as small tumor size (less than 2 cm), diploid tumors with low proliferative rate, and nuclear grade I, all indicate a good prognosis with a disease-free survival of approx. 90% at 5 yr. Examination of the cost vs benefits in this category of patients suggest that routine treatment with systemic adjuvant therapy is not appropriate.     

乳腺癌转移风险评估标志物的研究进展

肿瘤转移是造成乳腺癌患者死亡的主要原因,为提高生存期,有大约80%的患者选择了辅助治疗,然而只有其中一部分患者最后真正发生了转移。那些实际转移风险很低,却仍然选择了进一步放疗、化疗、内分泌或免疫治疗的患者,不仅受到了治疗副作用的伤害、也造成了医疗资源的浪费。因此,准确评价患者的转移风险对指导临床工作格外重要。以肿瘤的基因改变和转移过程为切入点,利用先进的分子技术,已有数项指标通过严谨的实验论证,认为可以评估乳腺癌的转移风险,本文将对其进行简要的介绍和分析。     

Tumor-biological factors uPA and PAI-1 as stratification criteria of a multicenter adjuvant chemotherapy trial in node-negative breast cancer

In axillary node-negative primary breast cancer, 70% of the patients will be cured by locoregional treatment alone. Therefore, adjuvant systemic therapy is only needed for those 30% of node-negative patients who will relapse after primary therapy and eventually die of metastases. Traditional histomorphological and clinical factors do not provide sufficient information to allow accurate risk group assessment in order to identify node-negative patients who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. In the last decade various groups have reported a strong and statistically independent prognostic impact of the serine protease uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1) in node-negative breast cancer patients. Based on these data, a prospective multicenter therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer patients was started in Germany in June 1993, supported by the German Research Association (DFG). Axillary node-negative breast cancer patients with high levels of either or both proteolytic factors in the tumor tissue were randomized to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy versus observation only. Recruitment was continued until the end of 1998, by which time 684 patients had been enrolled. Since then, patients have been followed up in order to assess the value of uPA and PAI-1 determination as an adequate selection criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer patients. This paper reports on the rationale and design of this prospective multicenter clinical trial, which may have an impact on future policies in prognosis-oriented treatment strategies.     

Immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer

The treatment of superficial bladder cancer requires adjuvant therapies besides transurethral resection because of a high recurrence rate after this standard treatment alone. Current adjuvant therapies involve intravesical chemotherapy for patients at low and intermediate risk for recurrence and progression, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin for patients at intermediate and high risk. However, these adjuvant therapies fail in a significant number of patients, dictating the need for new and improved adjuvant treatment modalities for superficial bladder cancer. Immunotherapy aiming at the modulation of the immune system of the patient is a promising alternative adjuvant. This review discusses the current status of the clinical development of various immunotherapy approaches for superficial bladder cancer, including passive immunotherapy, immune stimulants, immunogene therapy and cancer vaccination.     

Endocrine approaches for the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Preventing clinical progression is the major treatment goal for both early and advanced breast cancer. For hormone-responsive cases (about 70% of the total), this can necessitate the use of sequential hormone therapies at various points during the patient's life. Newer hormonal therapies, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, are now competing with tamoxifen as first choice endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, a further non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole has been shown to be beneficial when given at completion of 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen. In light of these new data, current treatment paradigms need to be reviewed. Already well established as second-line treatments for advanced breast cancer, the improved risk:benefit profiles of anastrozole and letrozole compared with tamoxifen mean that these agents are now also recognised alternative treatments in the first-line relapse setting. More recent studies demonstrate that anastrozole may also have an improved risk:benefit profile compared with tamoxifen when used as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. Anastrozole is also being evaluated as a preventative treatment in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. A new addition to the endocrine treatment armamentarium is the oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant, which, unlike tamoxifen, has no agonist effects. Fulvestrant is at least as effective as anastrozole in the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, and provides similar benefits to tamoxifen when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive tumours.     

Prognostic and predictive value of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 in operable breast cancer

The present study on the prognostic and predictive value of serine proteases was conducted in 460 early breast cancer patients mostly treated with some kind of adjuvant systemic therapy: 156 received chemotherapy, 141 hormone therapy and 111 a combination of both. Already in univariate analysis PAI-1 was the only proteolytic factor with a significant impact on DFS, which was retained in multivariate analysis (p = 0.020); PAI-2 showed borderline significance in univariate analysis (p = 0.0503) and uPA did not present as a significant prognostic factor for DFS in our patient series. In a separate univariate analysis of DFS on patient subgroups defined by adjuvant systemic therapy, a higher risk of relapse associated with higher uPA and PAI-1 levels was found in the subgroup of patients who did not receive any treatment; this difference did not reach the level of significance, probably due to the small number (n = 52) of patients in this group (HR 1.37; p = 0.71 and HR 2.14; p = 0.321, respectively). A higher risk of relapse was also found in the subgroup of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.44; p = 0.381 and HR 2.48; p = 0.003, respectively). In contrast, the bad prognostic impact of high uPA and PAI-1 levels was lost in the subgroup of patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy (HR 0.79; p = 0.693 and HR 0.26; p = 0.204, respectively). The same observations were made for the uPA/PAI-1 combination. Our study confirmed the prognostic value of serine proteases in early breast cancer. In addition, it pointed to a possible predictive value of these tumor markers for response to adjuvant hormone therapy with tamoxifen, which should be confirmed in further studies.     

Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications

A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience with 40 consecutive patients who had undergone two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstruction and radiation during the period from 1990 through 1997. A randomly selected group of 40 other two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstructions from the same surgeon and time period served as controls. This review was undertaken because of the absence of specific information on the outcome of staged saline implant reconstructions in the radiated breast. Previously published reports on silicone gel implants and radiation have been contradictory. At the same time, the criteria for the use of radiation in the treatment of breast cancer have been expanded and the numbers of reconstruction patients who have been radiated are increasing dramatically. For example, in a 1985 report on immediate breast reconstruction, only 1 of 185 patients over a 6-year period underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas in this review, there were 40 radiated breasts with saline-filled implants, 19 of which received adjuvant radiation therapy during their expansion. The study parameters included patient age, breast cup size, implant size, length of follow-up, number of procedures, coincident flap operations, Baker classification, complications, opposite breast procedures, pathologic stage, indications for and details about the radiation, and outcomes. The use of radiation in this review of reconstructed breasts can logically be divided into four groups: previous lumpectomy and radiation (n = 7), mastectomy and radiation before reconstruction (n = 9), mastectomy and adjuvant radiation during reconstruction/expansion (n = 19), and radiation after reconstruction (n = 5). The largest and most rapidly growing group of patients is of those receiving postmastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 47.5 percent (19 of 40) of radiated breasts with saline implants ultimately needed the addition of, or replacement by, a flap. Ten percent of a control group with nonradiated saline implant reconstructions also had flaps, none as replacements. Fifty percent or more of both the radiated and control groups had contralateral surgery. Complications were far more common in the radiated group; for example, there were 32.5 percent capsular contractures compared with none in the control group. The control nonradiated implant-only group and the flap plus implant radiated group did well cosmetically. The radiated implant-only group was judged the worst. The increasing use of radiation after mastectomy has important implications for breast reconstruction. The possibility for radiation should be thoroughly investigated and anticipated preoperatively before immediate breast reconstruction. Patients with invasive disease, particularly with large tumors or palpable axillary lymph nodes, are especially likely to be encouraged to undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy. The indications for adjuvant radiation therapy have included four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, tumors 4 cm (or more) in diameter, and tumors at or near the margin of resection. More recently, some centers are recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with as few as one positive lymph node or even in situ carcinoma close to the resection margin. The use of latissimus dorsi flaps after radiation has proven to be an excellent solution to postradiation tissue contracture, which can occur during breast expander reconstruction. The use of the latissimus flap electively with skin-sparing mastectomy preradiation is probably unwise, unless postmastectomy radiation is unlikely. Skin-sparing mastectomy with a latissimus flap thus should be preserved for patients unlikely to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy. Purely autologous reconstruction such as a TRAM flap is another option for these patients, either before or after radiation therapy.     

Borderline ovarian tumors: a review of treatment.

Borderline ovarian tumors have an excellent prognosis. In stage I disease, no therapy in addition to surgery is needed, and conservation of ovarian tissue for future childbearing may be appropriate. In advanced stages, the use of adjuvant therapy has not consistently led to cures, and complications have been reported. A randomized study of no adjuvant therapy versus adjuvant treatment with long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine the efficacy of additional treatment.     

High-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer: is monotherapy adequate?

High-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer represents a diverse disease entity. Patients who are considered to be at highest risk for biochemical failure after localized treatments may not be at significant risk for disea-sespecific mortality. In this review, an attempt will be made to define high-risk status and help identify patients at high risk for mortality after a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. Subsequently, a review of monotherapy approaches as well as previously successful strategies utilizing multimodality therapy for high-risk disease will be presented. Finally, a synopsis will be given of several ongoing randomized clinical trials using the most effective systemic therapies in the adjuvant setting following thorough local treatments such as radical prostatectomy. This review will provide a glimpse into the future and describe the tools that it is hoped will improve further upon the results of surgical monotherapy for high-risk, localized prostate cancer.     

Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone To Stimulate 131-1 Uptake For Remnant Ablation And Adjuvant Therapy

ObjectiveTo review the current literature with regard to the use of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH) as an adjunct to radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation and adjuvant therapy.MethodsLiterature review of clinical studies examining rhTSH and/or thyroid hormone withdrawal preparations for RAI remnant ablation. The primary endpoints evaluated were (1) effectiveness at ablating the thyroid bed as demonstrated by the lack of significant uptake in the thyroid bed on follow-up diagnostic imaging and (2) effectiveness in facilitating the adjuvant therapy function of RAI ablation as manifested by follow-up thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)-stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels and clinical outcomes (recurrence rates, likelihood of having no evidence of disease at final follow-up).ResultsRAI remnant ablation can be successfully achieved using either traditional thyroid hormone withdrawal or recombinant human TSH preparation. While initial studies included primarily thyroid cancer patients at low risk of recurrence, more recent studies suggest that rhTSH can also be effectively used as preparation for RAI ablation in patients with an intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Furthermore, while early studies focused primarily on the endpoint of thyroid bed remnant ablation, more recent retrospective studies suggest that final clinical outcomes (recurrence rates, likelihood of achieving no evidence of disease status at final follow-up) over 5-10 years of follow-up are very similar with either method of preparation.ConclusionrhTSH is an effective alternative to thyroid hormone withdrawal in preparation for RAI remnant ablation in patients without evidence of distant metastases who are at low, intermediate, or high risk of recurrence.     

Chemotherapy of breast cancer: focus on paclitaxel

Paclitaxel is among the most effective agents in the treatment of breast cancer. Both as a single agent and in combinations, paclitaxel is effective as first-line therapy and as a salvage therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Paclitaxel also demonstrated efficacy in patients who received prior anthracyclin therapy and those with anthracyclin-resistant disease. In the adjuvant setting, data from randomized study have supported the sequential use of paclitaxel after therapy with doxorubicin / cyclophosphamide for patients with node-positive disease. The drug may be used in combination with other chemotherapeutical agents and immune stymulatory agents. Therapy on weekly and every-three-week schedules has been effective.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Proposed guidelines for monitoring toxicity.

The most common toxicities of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are gastropathy, renal dysfunction, and liver function abnormalities. We outline an approach to monitoring patients on long-term NSAID therapy, focusing on the early detection of complications. Gastropathy caused by NSAID use is more common in elderly patients or those with a history of dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, or alcohol abuse. Fecal occult blood testing and hemograms are less accurate in detecting gastropathy than direct visualization but are convenient and relatively inexpensive. We recommend the periodic use of these tests to detect NSAID-induced acute or chronic blood loss. Renal toxicity is seen in patients with preexisting renal disease or functional volume depletion and in the elderly. Complications include renal insufficiency, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, and protein-uria. Renal function should be monitored during the first few weeks of NSAID therapy, especially in high-risk patients, with periodic testing thereafter. Hepatic toxicity is less common but warrants occasional determinations of alanine aminotransferase levels. Elderly patients and those with renal insufficiency or alcohol abuse have a higher risk of complications. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be used cautiously in those patients at high risk for complications. Strategies can be used to limit toxicity. Patients taking these drugs long term should be monitored periodically for signs of blood loss, renal dysfunction, and hepatic dysfunction.     

Management of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis or osteopenia occurs in about 44 million Americans, resulting in 1.5 million fragility fractures per year. The consequences of these fractures include pain, disability, depression, loss of independence, and increased mortality. The burden to the healthcare system, in terms of cost and resources, is tremendous, with an estimated direct annual USA healthcare expenditure of about $17 billion. With longer life expectancy and the aging of the baby-boomer generation, the number of men and women with osteoporosis or low bone density is expected to rise to over 61 million by 2020. Osteoporosis is a silent disease that causes no symptoms until a fracture occurs. Any fragility fracture greatly increases the risk of future fractures. Most patients with osteoporosis are not being diagnosed or treated. Even those with previous fractures, who are at extremely high risk of future fractures, are often not being treated. It is preferable to diagnose osteoporosis by bone density testing of high risk individuals before the first fracture occurs. If osteoporosis or low bone density is identified, evaluation for contributing factors should be considered. Patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy are at especially high risk for developing osteoporosis, and may sustain fractures at a lower bone density than those not taking glucocorticoids. All patients should be counseled on the importance of regular weight-bearing exercise and adequate daily intake of calcium and vitamin D. Exposure to medications that cause drowsiness or hypotension should be minimized. Non-pharmacologic therapy to reduce the non-skeletal risk factors for fracture should be considered. These include fall prevention through balance training and muscle strengthening, removal of fall hazards at home, and wearing hip protectors if the risk of falling remains high. Pharmacologic therapy can stabilize or increase bone density in most patients, and reduce fracture risk by about 50%. By selecting high risk patients for bone density testing it is possible to diagnose this disease before the first fracture occurs, and initiate appropriate treatment to reduce the risk of future fractures.     

A ten-microRNA expression signature predicts survival in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor with very poor patient median survival. To identify a microRNA (miRNA) expression signature that can predict GBM patient survival, we analyzed the miRNA expression data of GBM patients (n=222) derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. We divided the patients randomly into training and testing sets with equal number in each group. We identified 10 significant miRNAs using Cox regression analysis on the training set and formulated a risk score based on the expression signature of these miRNAs that segregated the patients into high and low risk groups with significantly different survival times (hazard ratio [HR]=2.4; 95% CI=1.4-3.8; p<0.0001). Of these 10 miRNAs, 7 were found to be risky miRNAs and 3 were found to be protective. This signature was independently validated in the testing set (HR=1.7; 95% CI=1.1-2.8; p=0.002). GBM patients with high risk scores had overall poor survival compared to the patients with low risk scores. Overall survival among the entire patient set was 35.0% at 2 years, 21.5% at 3 years, 18.5% at 4 years and 11.8% at 5 years in the low risk group, versus 11.0%, 5.5%, 0.0 and 0.0% respectively in the high risk group (HR=2.0; 95% CI=1.4-2.8; p<0.0001). Cox multivariate analysis with patient age as a covariate on the entire patient set identified risk score based on the 10 miRNA expression signature to be an independent predictor of patient survival (HR=1.120; 95% CI=1.04-1.20; p=0.003). Thus we have identified a miRNA expression signature that can predict GBM patient survival. These findings may have implications in the understanding of gliomagenesis, development of targeted therapy and selection of high risk cancer patients for adjuvant therapy.     

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for early breast cancer: Follow up of a new treatment standard

AimTo assess the oncological outcomes of patients with early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant hypofractionated radiation therapy.Methods and MaterialThis retrospective analysis included all patients ≥50 year of age with T1-2 N0 M0 breast cancer treated at our Radiation Oncology Unit between 2008 and 2011. Whole-breast radiation therapy was delivered to a dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions, without boost. The primary outcome was local control.Results212 patients were identified. With a median follow up of 60 months, we found 3% local recurrence and 5.3% regional and/or distant recurrences. At the moment of data analysis, 17 patients had died. Out of 5 local recurrences, 2 had previously had a distant recurrence, both of them died. The other three were still alive at the last follow up. These results are comparable to those observed in Phase III trials that use this fractionation scheme.ConclusionsThe results obtained with this retrospective analysis are comparable to those obtained in large randomized trials. This data also supports the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy in Latin America. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for early breast cancer patients should be the standard adjuvant treatment.     

Treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is an increasingly common condition. It may cause disabling symptoms and is an important risk factor for stroke. The goals of treatment include the relief and prevention of rate- and rhythm-related symptoms and the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli. Three principal treatments should be considered: pharmacologic rate control, cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, and prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of stroke. The risks and benefits of each of these therapies have been reviewed. Symptoms, if present, can often be managed safely with rate-directed therapy alone. Until issues regarding safety and long-term efficacy are resolved, cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy should be limited to those patients whose symptoms cannot otherwise be controlled. The benefits of warfarin anticoagulation for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been demonstrated convincingly by several randomized clinical trials. These benefits must be weighed against the real risk of major hemorrhage. For patients at low risk of stroke, the use of aspirin may be an acceptable alternative to warfarin sodium therapy.