Two intracellular helices of G-protein coupling receptors could generally support oligomerization and coupling with transducers

For many G-protein coupling receptors (GPCRs), the upkeep of receptor dimers could depend on association with functional Gi α subunits. This is known for Y1, Y2 and Y4 neuropeptide Y receptors [presented in the companion paper (Estes et al., Amino Acids, doi:, 2010)]. Interactions with transducers use mainly intracellular domains of the receptors. Intracellular loops 1 and 2 in GPCRs are short and lack extensive helicity that could support transducer anchoring. Interaction with G-proteins is known to use the juxtamembrane Helix 8 in the fourth intracellular domain, for which we document a helix-stabilizing n/(n + 4) pattern of large hydrophobic sidechains. Another intracellular helix located in the C-terminal portion of the third intracellular loop does not display a strong stabilizing pattern, and is found in many studies to serve dynamically in association and activation of transducers and effectors. We show that these tracts share features across metazoan phyla not only in opsins and opsin-like receptors (including the Y receptors), but also in Taste-2 and Frizzled receptors. Similarities of these helices across GPCR groups could have both phylogenetic and functional roots.     

Angiogenesis and rhodopsin-like receptors: a role for N-terminal acidic residues?

Numerous rhodopsin-like G-protein coupling receptors induce or inhibit angiogenesis. The active human receptors include several chemokine receptors, apelin APJ receptor, neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor, Duffy antigen, and herpes virus-8 receptor. A common and striking feature of these receptors is the large fraction (up to 42%) of residues with anionic sidechains (Asp, Glu, and benzene anions Tyr, Trp, and Phe) in the N-terminal extracellular domain. These residues (which are frequently clustered) can assist the binding of ligand peptides, but should also support interactions that help tubular arraying of cells, e.g., via cationic bridges and/or hydrogen bonding with cell-connecting receptors such as integrins, or with proteins of the extracellular matrix.     

Type II Opsins: Evolutionary Origin by Internal Domain Duplication?

Opsins are a large group of proteins with seven transmembrane segments (TMSs) that are found in all domains of life. There are two types of opsins that are sometimes considered nonhomologous: type I is known from prokaryotes and some eukaryotes, while type II is known only from Eumetazoan animals. Type II opsins are members of the family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which facilitate signal transduction across cell membranes. While previous studies have concluded that multiple transmembrane-containing protein families-including type I opsins-originated by internal domain duplication, the origin of type II opsins has been speculated on but never tested. Here we show that type II opsins do not appear to have originated through a similar internal domain duplication event. This provides further evidence that the two types of opsins are nonhomologous, indicating a convergent evolutionary origin, in which both groups of opsins evolved a seven-TM structure and light sensitivity independently. This convergence may indicate an important role for seven-TM protein structure for retinal-based light sensitivity.     

The activation mechanism of class-C G-protein coupled receptors

Class-C G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a distant group among the large family of GPCRs. This class includes the receptors for the main neurotransmitters, glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and the receptors for Ca(2+), some taste and pheromone molecules, as well as some orphan receptors. Like any other GPCRs, class-C receptors possess a heptahelical domain (HD) involved in heterotrimeric G-protein activation, but most of them also have a large extracellular domain (ECD) responsible for agonist recognition and binding. In addition, it is now well accepted that these receptors are dimers, either homo or heterodimers. This complex architecture raises a number of important questions. Here we will discuss our view of how agonist binding within the large ECD triggers the necessary change of conformation, or stabilize a specific conformation, of the heptahelical domain leading to G-protein activation. How ligands acting within the heptahelical domain can change the properties of these complex macromolecules.     

NMR structural comparison of the cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domains of G-protein-coupled CB1 and CB2 receptors in membrane mimetic dodecylphosphocholine micelles

The fourth cytoplasmic domain, the so-called C-terminal juxtamembrane segment or helix VIII, has been identified in numerous G-protein-coupled receptors and exhibits unique functional characteristics. Efforts have been devoted to studying the juxtamembrane segment in order to understand the biological importance of the segment in G-protein activation of the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Recent biochemical data revealed that the CB1 C-terminal juxtamembrane peptide fragment CB1-(401-417) can directly activate the G-protein and also showed that the specificity of the signal transduction activation by the C-terminal juxtamembrane region is unique to the CB1 receptor but not to the CB2 receptor (Mukhopadhyay, S., and Howlett, A. C. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 499-505). However, there is experimental work, not yet reported, on the conformational analyses and structural comparison between the respective helix VIII segments of the two receptors. In the present study, we have examined the conformational specificities of the cytoplasmic helical domains for both cannabinoid receptors. Three-dimensional structural features of two synthetic CB1 and CB2 peptides, CB1I397-G418 and CB2I298-K319, respectively, in membrane mimetic DPC micelles were studied using a combined high resolution NMR and computer modeling approach. Comparisons of the NMR-determined structures of the two peptides as well as their correspondent mutant peptides revealed their conformational properties and salt bridge dissimilarity, which might help us to understand the different structural roles of the fourth cytoplasmic helices in the function and regulation of CB1 and CB2 receptors.     

How do G-protein-coupled receptors work? The case of metabotropic glutamate and GABA receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane proteins family in animal genomes. Being the receptors for most hormones and neurotransmitters, these proteins play a central role in intercellular communication. GPCRs can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common structural feature: the heptahelical domain. The metabotropic receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) belong to the class III of GPCRs, together with others receptors for Ca2+, for sweet and amino acid taste compounds and for some pheromones, as well as for odorants in fish. Besides their transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation, most of class III receptors possess a large extracellular domain responsible for ligand recognition. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain of one of these receptors, the mGlu1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed an original mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities to develop drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raised a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of other GPCRs.     

Phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the kinase domain and juxtamembrane region regulates the biological and catalytic activities of Eph receptors

Members of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases exhibit a striking degree of amino acid homology, particularly notable in the kinase and membrane-proximal regions. A mutagenesis approach was taken to address the functions of specific conserved tyrosine residues within these catalytic and juxtamembrane domains. Ligand stimulation of wild-type EphB2 in neuronal NG108-15 cells resulted in an upregulation of catalytic activity and an increase in cellular tyrosine phosphorylation, accompanied by a retraction of neuritic processes. Tyrosine-to-phenylalanine substitutions within the conserved juxtamembrane motif abolished these responses. The mechanistic basis for these observations was examined using the highly related EphA4 receptor in a continuous coupled kinase assay. Tandem mass spectrometry experiments confirmed autophosphorylation of the two juxtamembrane tyrosine residues and also identified a tyrosine within the kinase domain activation segment as a phosphorylation site. Kinetic analysis revealed a decreased affinity for peptide substrate upon substitution of activation segment or juxtamembrane tyrosines. Together, our data suggest that the catalytic and therefore biological activities of Eph receptors are controlled by a two-component inhibitory mechanism, which is released by phosphorylation of the juxtamembrane and activation segment tyrosine residues.     

Autoregulation by the juxtamembrane region of the human ephrin receptor tyrosine kinase A3 (EphA3)

Ephrin receptors (Eph) affect cell shape and movement, unlike other receptor tyrosine kinases that directly affect proliferative pathways. The kinase domain of EphA3 is activated by ephrin binding and receptor oligomerization. This activation is associated with two tyrosines in the juxtamembrane region; these tyrosines are sites of autophosphorylation and interact with the active site of the kinase to modulate activity. This allosteric event has important implications both in terms of understanding signal transduction pathways mediated by Eph kinases as well as discovering specific therapeutic ligands for receptor kinases. In order to provide further details of the molecular mechanism through which the unphosphorylated juxtamembrane region blocks catalysis, we studied wild-type and site-specific mutants in detail. High-resolution structures of multiple states of EphA3 kinase with and without the juxtamembrane segment allowed us to map the coupled pathway of residues that connect the juxtamembrane segment, the activation loop, and the catalytic residues of the kinase domain. This highly conserved set of residues likely delineates a molecular recognition pathway for most of the Eph RTKs, helping to characterize the dynamic nature of these physiologically important enzymes.     

Requirement of specific intrahelical interactions for stabilizing the inactive conformation of glycoprotein hormone receptors

Systematic analysis of structural changes induced by activating mutations has been frequently utilized to study activation mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the thyrotropin receptor and the lutropin receptor (LHR), a large number of naturally occurring mutations leading to constitutive receptor activation were identified. Saturating mutagenesis studies of a highly conserved Asp in the junction of the third intracellular loop and transmembrane domain 6 suggested a participation of this anionic residue in a salt bridge stabilizing the inactive receptor conformation. However, substitution of all conserved cationic residues at the cytoplasmic receptor surface did not support this hypothesis. Asp/Glu residues are a common motif at the N-terminal ends of alpha-helices terminating and stabilizing the helical structure (helix capping). Since Asp/Glu residues in the third intracellular loop/transmembrane domain 6 junction are not only preserved in glycoprotein hormone receptors but also in other GPCRs we speculated that this residue probably participates in an N-terminal helix-capping structure. Poly-Ala stretches are known to form and stabilize alpha-helices. Herein, we show that the function of the highly conserved Asp can be mimicked by poly-Ala substitutions in the LHR and thyrotropin receptor. CD and NMR studies of peptides derived from the juxtamembrane portion of the LHR confirmed the helix extension by the poly-Ala substitution and provided further evidence for an involvement of Asp in a helix-capping structure. Our data implicate that in addition to well established interhelical interactions the inactive conformation of GPCRs is also stabilized by specific intrahelical structures.     

Elucidation of the role of peptide linker in calcium-sensing receptor activation process

Family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which includes metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), sweet and "umami" taste receptors (T1Rs), and the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR), represent a distinct group among the superfamily of GPCRs characterized by large amino-terminal extracellular ligand-binding domains (ECD) with homology to bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins that are responsible for signal detection and receptor activation through as yet unresolved mechanism(s) via the seven-transmembrane helical domain (7TMD) common to all GPCRs. To address the mechanism(s) by which ligand-induced conformational changes are conveyed from the ECD to the 7TMD for G-protein activation, we altered the length and composition of a 14-amino acid linker segment common to all family 3 GPCRs except GABA(B) receptor, in the CaR by insertion, deletion, and site-directed mutagenesis of specific highly conserved residues. Small alterations in the length and composition of the linker impaired cell surface expression and abrogated signaling of the chimeric receptors. The exchange of nine amino acids within the linker of CaR with the homologous sequence of mGluR1, however, preserved receptor function. Ala substitution for the four highly conserved residues within this amino acid sequence identified a Leu at position 606 of the CaR critical for cell surface expression and signaling. Substitution of Leu(606) for Ala resulted in impaired cell surface expression. However, Ile and Val substitutions displayed strong activating phenotypes. Disruption of the linker by insertion of nine amino acids of a random-coiled structure uncoupled the ECD from regulating the 7TMD. These data are consistent with a model of receptor activation in which the peptide linker, and particularly Leu(606), provides a critical interaction for the CaR signal transmission, a finding likely to be relevant for all family 3 GPCRs containing this conserved motif.     

An ion-responsive motif in the second transmembrane segment of rhodopsin-like receptors

A L(M)xxxD(N, E) motif (x=a non-ionic amino acid residue, most frequently A, S, L or F; small capitals indicating a minor representation) is found in the second transmembrane (tm2) segment of most G-protein coupling metazoan receptors of the rhodopsin family (Rh-GPCRs). Changes in signal transduction, agonist binding and receptor cycling are known for numerous receptors bearing evolved or experimentally introduced mutations in this tm2 motif, especially of its aspartate residue. The [Na⁺] sensitivity of the receptor-agonist interaction relates to this aspartate in a number of Rh-GPCRs. Native non-conservative mutations in the tm2 motif only rarely coincide with significant changes in two other ubiquitous features of the rhodopsin family, the seventh transmembrane N(D)PxxY(F) motif and the D(E)RY(W,F) or analogous sequence at the border of the third transmembrane helix and the second intracellular loop. Native tm2 mutations with Rh-GPCRs frequently result in constitutive signaling, and with visual opsins also in shifts to short-wavelength sensitivity. Substitution of a strongly basic residue for the tm2 aspartate in Taste-2 receptors could be connected to a lack of sodium sensing by these receptors. These properties could be consistent with ionic interactions, and even of ion transfer, that involve the tm2 motif. A decrease in cation sensing by this motif is usually connected to an enhanced constitutive interaction of the mutated receptors with cognate G- proteins, and also relates to both the constitutive and the overall activity of the short-wavelength opsins.     

The second intracellular loop of metabotropic glutamate receptors recognizes C termini of G-protein alpha-subunits

Heptahelical receptor coupling selectivity to G-proteins is controlled by a large contact area that involves several portions of the receptor and each subunit of the G-protein. In the G-protein alpha subunit, the C-terminal 5 residues, the N terminus, and the alpha N-beta 1 and alpha 4-alpha 5 loops play important roles. On the receptor side, both the second and third (i2 and i3) intracellular loops as well as the C-terminal tail probably contact these different regions of the G-protein. It is now accepted that the C terminus of the alpha subunit binds in a cavity formed by the i2 and i3 loops. Among the various G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), class III receptors that include metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors greatly differ from the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, but the contact zone between these receptors and the G-protein is less understood. The C terminus of the alpha subunit has been shown to play a pivotal role in the selective recognition of class III GPCRs. Indeed, the mGlu2 and mGlu4 and -8 receptors can discriminate between alpha subunits that differ at the level of their C-terminal end only (such as Gqo and Gqz). Here, we examine the role of the i2 loop of mGluRs in the selective recognition of this region of the alpha subunit. To that aim, we analyzed the coupling properties of mGlu2 and mGlu4 or -8 receptors and chimeras containing the i2 loop of the converse receptor to G-protein alpha subunits that only differ by their C termini (Gqo,Gqz, and their point mutants). Our data demonstrate that the central portion of the i2 loop is responsible for the selective recognition of the C-terminal end of the alpha subunit, especially the residue on position -4. These data are consistent with the proposal that the C-terminal end of the G-protein alpha subunit interacts with residues in a cavity formed by the i2 and i3 loops in class III GPCRs, as reported for class I GPCRs.     

A chemogenomic analysis of the transmembrane binding cavity of human G-protein-coupled receptors

The amino acid sequences of 369 human nonolfactory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been aligned at the seven transmembrane domain (TM) and used to extract the nature of 30 critical residues supposed--from the X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin bound to retinal--to line the TM binding cavity of ground-state receptors. Interestingly, the clustering of human GPCRs from these 30 residues mirrors the recently described phylogenetic tree of full-sequence human GPCRs (Fredriksson et al., Mol Pharmacol 2003;63:1256-1272) with few exceptions. A TM cavity could be found for all investigated GPCRs with physicochemical properties matching that of their cognate ligands. The current approach allows a very fast comparison of most human GPCRs from the focused perspective of the predicted TM cavity and permits to easily detect key residues that drive ligand selectivity or promiscuity.     

Functional and biophysical analysis of the C-terminus of the CGRP-receptor; a family B GPCR

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically have a functionally important C-terminus which, in the largest subfamily (family A), includes a membrane-parallel eighth helix. Mutations of this region are associated with several diseases. There are few C-terminal studies on the family B GPCRs and no data supporting the existence of a similar eighth helix in this second major subfamily, which has little or no sequence homology to family A GPCRs. Here we show that the C-terminus of a family B GPCR (CLR) has a disparate region from N400 to C436 required for CGRP-mediated internalization, and a proximal region of twelve residues (from G388 to W399), in a similar position to the family A eighth helix, required for receptor localization at the cell surface. A combination of circular and linear dichroism, fluorescence and modified waterLOGSY NMR spectroscopy (SALMON) demonstrated that a peptide mimetic of this domain readily forms a membrane-parallel helix anchored to the liposome by an interfacial tryptophan residue. The study reveals two key functions held within the C-terminus of a family B GPCR and presents support for an eighth helical region with striking topological similarity to the nonhomologous family A receptor. This helix structure appears to be found in most other family B GPCRs.     

NCD3G: a novel nine-cysteine domain in family 3 GPCRs

The NCD3G [for nine-cysteine domain of family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)] domain is a novel protein domain that is conserved in family 3 GPCRs, including metabotropic glutamate receptors, calcium-sensing receptors, pheromone receptors and taste receptors, with the exception of GABA(B) receptors. The NCD3G domain contains nine highly conserved cysteine residues. Structural predictions suggest that NCD3G might possess four beta strands and three disulfide bridges. The structural model of NCD3G highlights the conserved residues co-segregated with certain familial diseases.     

Methionine proximity assay,a novel method for exploring peptide ligand-receptor interaction

Probing G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) structures is a priority in the functional and structural understanding of GPCRs. In the past, we have used several approaches around photoaffinity labeling in order to establish contact points between peptide ligands and their cognate receptors. Such contact points are helpful to build reality based molecular models of GPCRs and to elucidate their activation mechanisms. Most studies of peptidergic GPCRs have been done with photolabeling peptides containing the benzophenone moiety as a reputedly non-selective probe. However our recent results are now showing that p-benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) has some selectivity for Met residues in the receptor protein, reducing the accuracy of this method. Turning a problem into an asset, modified analogues of Bpa, e.g. p,p'-nitrobenzoylphenylalanine (NO2Bpa), display increased selectivity for such Met residues. It means a photoprobe containing such modified benzophenone-moieties does not label a receptor protein unless a Met residue is in the immediate vicinity. This unique property allows us to propose and show the feasibility and utility of a new method for scanning the contact areas of peptidergic GPCRs, the Methionine Proximity Assay (MPA). Putative contact residues of the receptor are exchanged to Met residues by site-directed mutagenesis and are subjected to photoaffinity labeling with such modified benzophenone-containing peptides. Successful incorporation indicates physical proximity of those residues. This principle is established and explored with benzophenone-containing analogues of angiotensin II and the two known human angiotensin II receptors AT1 and AT2, determining contact points in both receptors. This approach has several important advantages over other scanning approaches, e.g., the SCAM procedure, since the MPA-method can be used in the hydrophobic core of receptors.     

A transmembrane peptide from the human EGF receptor: behaviour of the cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domain in lipid bilayers

Solid state (2)H NMR spectroscopy was employed to study peptides related to the transmembrane domain of the human epidermal growth factor receptor, for insight into the interaction of its cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domain with the membrane surface. Since such receptors have clusters of (+)charged amino acids in this region, the effect of (-)charged phosphatidylserine at the concentration found naturally in the cytoplasmic leaflet (15 mol%) was considered. Each peptide contained 34 amino acids, which included the hydrophobic 23 amino acid stretch thought to span the membrane and a ten amino acid segment beyond the 'cytoplasmic' surface. Non-perturbing deuterium probe nuclei were located within alanine side chains in intramembranous and extramembranous portions. (2)H NMR spectra were recorded at 35 degrees C and 65 degrees C in fluid lipid bilayers consisting of (zwitterionic) 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine, with and without 15 mol% (anionic) phosphatidylserine. The cationic extramembranous portion of the receptor backbone was found to be highly rotationally mobile on a time scale of 10(-4)-10(-5) s in both types of membrane - as was the alpha-helical intramembranous portion. Deuterium nuclei in alanine side chains (-CD(3)) detected modest changes in peptide backbone orientation and/or dynamics related to the presence of 1-stearoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylserine: in the case of the extramembranous portion of the peptide these seemed related to lipid charge. Temperature effects on the peptide backbone external to the membrane were qualitatively different from effects on the helical transmembrane domain - likely reflecting the different physical constraints on these peptide regions and the greater flexibility of the extramembranous domain. Effects related to lipid charge could be detected in the spectrum of CD(3) groups on the internally mobile side chain of Val(650), six residues beyond the membrane surface.     

A naive Bayes model to predict coupling between seven transmembrane domain receptors and G-proteins

MOTIVATION: An understanding of the coupling between a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and a specific class of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) is vital for further comprehending the function of the receptor within a cell. However, predicting G-protein coupling based on the amino acid sequence of a receptor has been a daunting task. While experimental data for G-protein coupling exist, published models that rely on sequence based prediction are few. In this study, we have developed a Naive Bayes model to successfully predict G-protein coupling specificity by training over 80 GPCRs with known coupling. Each intracellular domain of GPCRs was treated as a discrete random variable, conditionally independent of one another. In order to determine the conditional probability distributions of these variables, ClustalW-generated phylogenetic trees were used as an approximation for the clustering of the intracellular domain sequences. The sampling of an intracellular domain sequence was achieved by identifying the cluster containing the homologue with the highest sequence similarity. RESULTS: Out of 55 GPCRs validated, the model yielded a correct classification rate of 72%. Our model also predicted multiple G-protein coupling for most of the GPCRs in the validation set. The Bayesian approach in this work offers an alternative to the experimental approach in order to answer the biological problem of GPCR/G-protein coupling selectivity. AVAILABILITY: Academic users should send their request for the perl program for calculating likelihood probabilities at jack.cao@astrazeneca.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The materials can be viewed at http://www.astrazeneca-montreal.com/AZRDM_info/supporting_info.pdf.     

The fourth transmembrane segment of the dopamine D2 receptor: accessibility in the binding-site crevice and position in the transmembrane bundle

The binding site of the dopamine D2 receptor, like that of homologous G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is contained within a water-accessible crevice formed among its seven transmembrane segments (TMSs). Using the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method (SCAM), we are mapping the residues that contribute to the surface of this binding-site crevice. We have mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 21 consecutive residues in the fourth TMS (TM4). Eleven of these mutants reacted with charged sulfhydryl-specific reagents, and bound antagonist protected nine of these from reaction. For the mutants in which cysteine was substituted for residues in the cytoplasmic half of TM4, treatment with the reagents had no effect on binding, consistent with these residues being inaccessible and with the low-resolution structure of the homologous rhodopsin, in which TM3 and TM5 occlude the cytoplasmic half of TM4. Although hydrophobicity analysis positions the C-terminus of TM4 at 4.64, Pro-Pro and Pro-X-Pro motifs, which are known to disrupt alpha-helices, occur at position 4.59 in a number of homologous GPCRs. The SCAM data were consistent with a C-terminus at 4.58, but it is also possible that the alpha-helix extends one additional turn to 4.62 in the D2 receptor, which has a single Pro at 4.59. In homologous GPCRs, the high degree of sequence variation between 4.59 and 4.68 is more characteristic of a loop domain than a helical segment. This region is shown here to be very conserved within functionally related receptors, suggesting an important functional role for this putative nonhelical domain. This inference is supported by observed ligand-specific effects of mutations in this region and by the predicted spatial proximity of this segment to known ligand binding sites in other TMs.