替吉奥治疗结肠癌的研究

目的：探讨替吉奥治疗结肠癌的疗效。方法：75例经病理组织学确诊的结肠癌患者,分为A、B、C组。A组：替吉奥联合奥沙利铂（艾恒）25例。B组：5-Fu／LV联合奥沙利铂（艾恒）25例。C组：替吉奥单药治疗25例。观察疗效、疾病控制率及不良反应。结果：A组、C组与B组对比,不良反应发生率明显降低。A组有效率48％,疾病控制率88％。B组有效率28％,疾病控制率84％。C组有效率32％,疾病控制率80％。结论：替吉奥是结肠癌辅助化疗联合用药及单药治疗老年结直肠癌较好的治疗药物。     

替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和安全性评估

目的:观察替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效,并对其用药安全性进行评估。方法:选取2010年8月—2012年8月在我院接受治疗的晚期胃癌患者68例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组34例。对照组患者采取5-FU+奥沙利铂+多西紫杉醇进行治疗,而观察组患者给予替吉奥+奥沙利铂+多西紫杉醇进行治疗,比较两组患者接受不同药物治疗所得到的近期疗效及不良反应的发生情况。结果:观察组治疗的总有效率为58.82%,而对照组治疗的总有效率为32.35%,观察组明显高于对照组,差异显著,具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者治疗后的不良反应发生率为8.82%,而对照组患者治疗后的不良反应发生率为32.35%,观察组明显低于对照组,差异显著,具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌疗效显著,不良反应少,患者耐受良好,值得进一步推广和应用。     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或替吉奥对晚期结肠癌患者血浆miR-21表达的影响

目的:探讨奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或替吉奥对晚期结肠癌患者血浆微小RNA-21(mi R-21)表达水平的影响及疗效。方法:选择2013年6月至2016年6月我院接诊的90例晚期结肠癌患者,随机分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组,每组45例。替吉奥组患者采用奥沙利铂联合替吉奥治疗,卡培他滨组患者采用奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清白介素-2(IL-2)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、干扰素-γ(INF-γ)及mi R-21水平变化、客观缓解率(ORR)以及不良反应。结果:治疗后,替吉奥组患者血清IL-2,TNF-α及INF-γ水平均高于卡培他滨组,而血浆mi R-21水平低于卡培他滨组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);替吉奥组客观缓解率(ORR)高于卡培他滨组,而不良反应总发生率低于卡培他滨组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:与卡培他滨相比,奥沙利铂联合替吉奥治疗晚期结肠癌的效果显著,可有效提高患者免疫力,抑制肿瘤发展,且不良反应较少,值得临床推广。     

替吉奥联合伊立替康治疗晚期结肠癌的临床研究

目的:比较替吉奥联合伊立替康与替吉奥单药治疗晚期结肠癌的临床疗效。方法:选取2011年3月~2012年3月我院收治的晚期结肠癌患者90例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为研究组和对照组,每组45例,研究组给予替吉奥联合伊立替康,对照组给予替吉奥单药治疗,比较两组近期疗效、远期疗效和不良反应。结果:研究组的总有效率51.1%(23/45)显著高于对照组的26.7%(12/45),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=13.281,P=0.017);研究组中位进展时间和中位生存时间均显著长于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(t=9.029,10.412,P=0.021,0.019);两组中性粒细胞减少和腹泻比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=11.517,12.041;P=0.023,0.019)。结论:替吉奥联合伊立替康治疗晚期结肠癌较单用替吉奥具有更好的治疗效果,值得临床推广应用。     

局部热疗联合替吉奥及奥沙利铂治疗胃癌腹腔转移的疗效观察

目的:评价局部热疗联合替吉奥及奥沙利铂治疗胃癌腹腔转移的疗效、患者生存质量及不良反应。方法:选择2011年1月-2016年1月来我院就诊的82例胃癌腹腔转移患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各41例。对照组采用替吉奥及奥沙利铂治疗,观察组在此基础上加用局部热疗,疗程为4周,治疗后对比两组患者的疗效、生存质量及不良反应情况。结果:治疗后,两组均有一定疗效,观察组的有效率为58.5%,明显高于对照组的31.7%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组的生存质量提高率为73.2%,明显高于对照组的48.8%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组发生呕吐13例,腹泻1例,口腔粘膜炎8例,对照组发生呕吐12例,3例腹泻,口腔粘膜炎9例,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组白细胞减少7例,对照组15例,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:局部热疗联合替吉奥及奥沙利铂治疗胃癌腹腔转移的疗效较好,患者生存质量改善,不良反应较轻。     

伊立替康联合奥沙利铂治疗可降低晚期结直肠癌的近期不良反应发生率

观察伊立替康联合奥沙利铂在治疗晚期结直肠癌中的近期不良反应发生率。收集2009年4月至2015年10月在我院住院接受治疗的晚期结肠癌患者42例。随机分成两组,每组21例,观察组为伊立替康联合奥沙利铂,对照组为奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶。主要观察指标为治疗效果及近期不良反应事件。结果显示,伊立替康联合奥沙利铂在治疗晚期结直肠癌的总体疗效上与对照组无统计学差异;近期总体不良反应发生率23.8%,显著低于对照组总体不良反应发生率57.1%,其中以消化系统和血液系统不良反应为主。伊立替康联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期结直肠癌的近期总体不良反应发生率相对较低,在临床上应用过程中需要注意消化系统和血液系统相关的不良反应的发生。     

顺铂和替吉奥治疗晚期头颈部肿瘤临床疗效观察

目的:研究顺铂和替吉奥治疗晚期头颈部肿瘤临床疗效观察。方法:选取我院收治的晚期头颈部肿瘤患者100例,分为观察组和对照组各50例,观察组用顺铂和替吉奥治疗,对照组用替吉奥治疗,对比治疗效果和不良反应。结果:观察组的有效率高于对照组,不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对晚期头颈部肿瘤患者进行顺铂和替吉奥联合治疗效果好。     

奥沙利铂联合替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期大肠癌患者的临床疗效

目的:探讨奥沙利铂联合替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期大肠癌患者的临床疗效。方法:非盲法随机对照方法将患者分成试验组和对照组,各27例。试验组患者使用奥沙利铂联合替吉奥胶囊治疗,对照组患者使用奥沙利铂治疗,均为4个周期。评价两组治疗后的临床疗效和不良反应。结果:试验组:CR 1例,PR 11例,SD 10例,PD 5例。(CR+PR)RR 44.4%。中位疾病进展时间(TTP)9.5个月,中位生存期(MST)19.1个月。对照组:CR 0例,PR 5例,SD 8例,PD 15例。(CR+PR)RR 18.5%。中位疾病进展时间(TTP)8.6个月,中位生存期(MST)16.9个月。主要不良反应为血液毒性、胃肠道反应、外周神经炎及肝功能异常。试验组白细胞下降15例,对照组12例,试验组贫血发生为13例,对照组的为21例,试验组恶心、呕吐发生为18例,对照组为24例,试验组便秘发生为8例,对照组为15例,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:奥沙利铂联合替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期大肠癌患者相比单独使用奥沙利铂更加有效,更具优越性,不良反应更少,患者的生存质量得以改善,值得临床上推广应用。     

术前调强放疗联合替吉奥化疗对局部晚期直肠癌患者的疗效回顾分析

目的:探讨术前调强放疗联合替吉奥化疗对局部晚期直肠癌患者的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年12月至2014年12月我院收治的局部晚期直肠癌患者90例进行研究,根据治疗方法分为三组:A组(n=30)给予术前调强放疗联合替吉奥化疗治疗,B组(n=30)仅给予术前调强放疗治疗,C组(n=30)给予替吉奥化疗治疗。比较三组患者的总有效率,血清TPS、CYFRA21-1水平变化情况,1年、2年、3年复发、转移、生存率,保肛率及不良反应发生情况。结果:A组总有效率86.68%显著高于对照B组的46.67%和C组的50.00%,差异显著(P0.05);治疗前,三组TPS、CYFRA21-1水平无显著差异(P0.05);治疗后,三组TPS、CYFRA21-1水平均显著下降,且A组低于B组和C组(P0.05);三组患者1年、2年复发、转移情况无显著差异;A组3年复发、转移情况均显著低于B组和C组(P0.05);三组患者1年、2年生存率无显著差异;A组3年生存率均显著高于B组和C组(P0.05);三组患者发生恶心呕吐、白细胞减少等并发症发生情况无显著差异;A组保肛率均显著高于B组和C组(P0.05)。结论:采用术前调强放疗联合替吉奥化疗治疗局部晚期直肠癌疗效好于术前放疗。     

培美曲塞单药或联合铂类治疗晚期复治非小细胞肺癌54例临床观察

目的:培美曲塞是一种多靶点抗叶酸化疗药,目前已成为晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的标准药物.本研究回顾分析培美曲塞单药或联合铂类治疗晚期复治非小细胞肺癌的疗效及不良反应.方法:对既往至少接受过1个标准含铂方案化疗的54例晚期非小细胞肺癌怠者,分为单药治疗组21例,联合铂类治疗组33例.单药治疗组给予培美曲塞单药治疗,培美曲塞500mg/m2,第1天,21天为1个周期;联合铂类治疗组给予培美曲塞联合顺铂或卡铂,培美曲塞500mg/m2,第1天,顺铂75 mg/m2或卡铂AUC=5,第1天,21天为1个周期.评价疗效及不良反应.结果:54例患者均可评价疗效.单药治疗组PR 1例,RR4.8%,SD10例,疾病控制率(DCR)52.4%,PD10例(47.6%).中位无进展生存期3.8个月;联合治疗组PR4例,RR12.1%,SD20例,疾病控制率(DCR)72.7%,PD9例(27.3%).中位无进展生存期4.8个月.与药物相关的不良反应主要为:Ⅰ/Ⅱ度骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应.结论:培美曲塞或与铂类联合治疗晚期复治非小细胞肺癌有效,不良反应轻微、可耐受.     

Celecoxib anti-aromatase neoadjuvant (CAAN) trial for locally advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combing aromatase inhibitor (AI) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor neoadjuvantly in postmenopausal patients with invasive hormone-sensitive breast cancer. METHODS: Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive exemestane 25mg daily and celecoxib 400mg twice daily (group A, n=30), exemestane 25mg daily (group B, n=24) and letrozole 2.5mg daily (group C, n=28). RESULTS: All groups showed clinical responses (58.6% for group A, 54.5% for group B and 62.0% for group C) and decrease in tumor area (61.8% for group A, 58.1% for group B and 55.7% for group C). 3 out of 5 patients with complete clinical response were observed from group A and 2 out of 69 patients operated with pathologic complete response were observed in group C. The mean microscopic tumor size was 2.53 cm for group A, 3.05 cm for group B and 2.10 cm for group C. The differences were only statistically significant when group C was compared with group B (P=0.025). The toxicity profiles among groups were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: AI is effective in treating breast cancer and may be safely used preoperatively. The addition of COX-2 inhibitor may provide additional benefit.     

注射液胸腺法新（日达仙）辅助希罗达联合奥沙利铂（XELOX方案）治疗 晚期胃癌的临床疗效观察

目的:探讨注射液胸腺法新(日达仙)辅助希罗达联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和对患者免疫功能及生活质量的影响。方法:选择2010-2013入院治疗的晚期胃癌患者116例,随机平均分为实验组(58例)和对照组(58例)。对照组给予卡培他滨片(希罗达)联合奥沙利铂,试验组在对照组的基础上辅用注射液胸腺法新(日达仙)治疗。每治疗两到三个周期后进行一次系统疗效评估,评估项目包括影像学腹部CT、胸片、腹部彩超、血常规、尿常规、肝功、肾功,肿瘤标记物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原(CA19-9,CA72-4)、免疫指标CD3+、CD8+、CD4/CD8、NK细胞,总治疗周期为6-8个周期。结果:实验组疾病治疗有效率为48%,对照组有效率为29%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(p=0.041),实验组患者中位无疾病进展期(PFS)为12.5月,显著高于对照组10.1月,两组比较具有统计学意义(P0.05)。实验组患者生活质量评分、外周血CD3+、CD8+、CD4/CD8、NK细胞数量均显著优于对照组(P0.05)。结论:注射液胸腺法新(日达仙)辅助希罗达联合奥沙利铂(XELOX方案)能够提高晚期胃癌的临床疗效,改善患者的生活质量和免疫力,减少患者化疗用药的毒副反应。     

Comparison of efficacy of different route of administration of chemotherapy on unresectable, advanced gastric cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies (FLEEOX and XELOX) with different routes of administration for unresectable gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 85 patients with unresectable gastric cancer hospitalized from January 2007 to December 2009 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FLEEOX group (48 patients) received the FLEEOX regimen(fluorouracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, epotoside, and oxaliplatin), which combined arterial with venous administration for one or two cycles, while the XELOX group (37 patients) received XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) via venous administration for two to four cycles. The clinical response and overall survival of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In the FLEEOX group, the clinical response rate (RR) of chemotherapy was 85.4% (41 of 48 patients) and the median survival time was 25 months. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.4% and 45.8%, respectively. In the XELOX group, the clinical RR was 59.5% and the median survival time was 9 months, while the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 35.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The clinical RR, the R0 resection rate, the median survival time, and the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were significantly better (P <0.05) in the FLEEOX group than in the XELOX group. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxic and adverse reactions or post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a preoperative diagnosis of unresectable gastric cancer, the efficacy of the FLEEOX regimen, which combines arterial with venous administration, was better than that of the XELOX regimen, using venous administration only. This combination of arterial and venous administration could be useful for improving the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.     

Effects of tamoxifen on cervicovaginal smears from patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of tamoxifen on cervicovaginal epithelium and determine the value of cervicovaginal smears in identifying patients at risk for endometrial carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A group of 48 women with prior breast cancer were divided into three groups: A, tamoxifen-treated patients who developed endometrial carcinoma (n = 20); B, patients with endometrial cancer not treated with tamoxifen (n = 22); and C, tamoxifen-treated patients with no endometrial carcinoma (n = 16). A total of 114 cervicovaginal smears from these patients were evaluated for maturation index, histiocytes, benign and malignant endometrial cells, reactive cellular changes and microorganisms. All patients treated with tamoxifen had received doses of 10 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The maturation index was increased in tamoxifen-treated patients (A and C) versus nontreated patients (B) P < or = .001). The number of cases with endometrial cells was significantly higher in smears of treated patients who developed endometrial cancer (A) as compared to groups B and C (P = .01 and .02, respectively). Histiocytes were also significantly increased in the two groups that subsequently developed endometrial carcinoma (A and B) as compared to the group that did not (group C) (P = .02). There was no significant difference in the presence of reactive cellular changes between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with tamoxifen exhibited a partial estrogenic effect in their smears regardless of whether they developed endometrial cancer. However, the presence of endometrial cells in the smears indicated a higher risk of endometrial adenocarcinoma.     

Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm

Although 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) combination chemotherapy provides a satisfactory therapeutic response in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasms (GTNs), it has severe side effects. The current study analyzed the therapeutic effects and side effects of tegafur plus actinomycin D (Act-D) vs. 5-Fu plus Act-D for the treatment of GTNs based on controlled historical records. A total of 427 GTN cases that received tegafur and Act-D combination chemotherapy at the Second Xiangya Hospital of XiangYa Medical School between August 2003 and July 2013 were analyzed based on historical data. A total of 393 GTN cases that received 5-Fu plus Act-D between August 1993 and July 2003 at the same hospital were also analyzed, which constituted the control group. The therapeutic effects, toxicity and side effects after chemotherapy were compared between the groups. The overall response rate was 90.63% in the tegafur+Act-D group (tegafur group) and 92.37% in the 5-Fu+Act-D group (5-Fu group); these rates were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the incidence rates of myelosuppression (white blood cell decline), gastrointestinal reactions (nausea, vomiting, dental ulcer, and diarrhea), skin lesions and phlebitis were lower in the tegafur group than in the 5-Fu group (P < 0.05). The results of this study may provide useful data for the clinical application of tegafur in GTN treatment.     

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂经肝动脉化疗栓塞对肝癌术后复发的预防作用探究

目的：探讨吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂经肝动脉化疗栓塞对肝癌术后复发的预防作用及其疗效分析。方法：回顾性分析2006年1月～2011年10月我院收治入院的97例晚期原发性肝癌患者的临床资料,将患者随机分为观察组（48例）和对照组（49例）,观察组采用吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂,对照组采用阿霉素灌注进行肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗,观察两组不同患者对肝癌术后复发的预防作用及其临床疗效。结果：两组患者疾病控制率及1年、2年的生存率比较上差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：在肝癌治疗中给予吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗,疗效确切,不良反应较轻,耐受性好,帮助患者改善生活质量,是晚期原发性肝癌的有效治疗方案。     

ERCC1蛋白表达与结肠癌FOLFOX方案化疗疗效及预后相关性分析

目的：探讨晚期结肠癌癌组织中核苷酸切除修复交叉互补基因1（excisionrepaircross—complementinggenel,ERCCl）~O表达状况及其与患者临床病理特征、奥沙利铂方案化疗疗效及预后之间的关系。方法：采用免疫组化方法检测晚期结肠癌癌组织中ERCCl蛋白表达状况。结果：晚期结肠癌癌组织中ERCCl表达阳性表达率为45．1％。ERCCl蛋白的表达状况与患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤部位、分化程度及病理类型均无关（P〉0．05）。ERCCl蛋白表达阴性患者奥沙利铂方案化疗有效率为56．O％高于表达阳性患者的34．1％（P。0．037）,并且接受化疗后表达阴性患者中位生存期为19个月高于表达阳性患者的14个月（P=0．016）。结论：ERCCl蛋白表达阴性的晚期结肠癌患者接受奥沙利铂方案化疗有效率较阴性患者高并有生存受益,ERCCl的表达状态可作为晚期结肠癌化疗方案的选择及预后判断的指标。     

PML as a potential predictive factor of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based first line chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer patients

PML regulates a wide range of pathways involved in tumorigenesis, such as apoptosis, which is also one of the main mechanisms through which oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine exert their antineoplastic activity. The present study aims to investigate PML expression as a predictive factor of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine therapy efficacy. Seventy-four metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received oxaliplatin/floropyrimidine-based first line therapy have been included in this retrospective study. PML expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. PML down-regulation was detected in 39 (52.7%) patients (14 complete and 25 partial PML loss). RR was significantly lower (25.6%) in patients with PML down-regulation than in patients with preserved PML expression (60%) (P = 0.006). Median TTP was 5.5 months when PML was down-regulated versus 11.9 months in case of preserved PML expression (P < 0.0001). A statistical significant difference was also detected in OS (15.6 and 24.5 months, respectively, P = 0.003). The impact of PML down-regulation on TTP and OS was statistically significant also in a multivariate model. This study represents the first evidence of a possible correlation between PML protein expression and outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based first line therapy.