p16INK4a and p14ARF methylation as a potential biomarker for human bladder cancer

Promoter hypermethylation is one of the putative mechanisms underlying the inactivation of negative cell-cycle regulators. We examined whether the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF), genes located upstream of the RB and p53 pathway, is a useful biomarker for the staging, clinical outcome, and prognosis of human bladder cancer. Using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), we examined the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) in 64 samples from 45 bladder cancer patients (34 males, 11 females). In 19 patients with recurrent bladder cancer, we examined paired tissue samples from their primary and recurrent tumors. The methylation status of representative samples was confirmed by bisulfite DNA sequencing analysis. The median follow-up duration was 34.3 months (range 27.0-100.1 months). The methylation rate for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) was 17.8% and 31.1%, respectively, in the 45 patients. The incidence of p16(INKa) and p14(ARF) methylation was significantly higher in patients with invasive (>or=pT2) than superficial bladder cancer (pT1) (p=0.006 and p=0.001, respectively). No MSP bands for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) were detected in the 8 patients with superficial, non-recurrent tumors. In 19 patients with tumor recurrence, the p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) methylation status of the primary and recurrent tumors was similar. Of the 22 patients who had undergone cystectomy, 8 (36.4%) manifested p16(INKa) methylation; p16(INK4a) was not methylated in 23 patients without cystectomy (p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with p14(ARF) methylation had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without (p=0.029). This is the first study indicating that MSP analysis of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) genes is a useful biomarker for the pathological stage, clinical outcome, and prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.     

Promoter hypermethylation of p16INK4A, p14ARF, CyclinD2 and Slit2 in serum and tumor DNA from breast cancer patients

Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation play important role in cancer. Epigenetic alterations involved in the onset and progression of breast cancer may serve as biomarkers for early detection and prediction of disease prognosis. Furthermore, using body fluids such as serum offers a non-invasive method to procure multiple samples for biomarker analyses. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between methylation status of multiple cancer genes, p16(INK4A), p14(ARF), Cyclin D2 and Slit2 in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and paired serum DNA and clinicopathological parameters. Of the 36 breast cancer patients investigated, 31 (86%) tumors and 30 (83%) paired sera showed methylation of at least one of these 4 genes. Methylation frequencies varied from 27% for CyclinD2, 44% for p16(INK4A), 47% for p14(ARF) to 58% for Slit2. There was concordance between DNA methylation in tumor and paired serum DNA of each gene. This study underscores the potential utility of DNA methylation based screening of serum as a surrogate marker for tumor DNA methylation status of these genes in breast cancer. Further, expression profile of p16(INK4A) could be linked to epigenetic events, thus suggesting this pathway as a potential target for therapeutic strategies based on reversal of epigenetic silencing.     

DNA methylation changes correlate with Gleason score and tumor stage in prostate cancer

DNA methylation, a widely used epigenetic mark, has been associated with many tumors. However, few studies have addressed the role of cell-free plasma DNA methylation in discriminating aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) from indolent cases. We conducted a case series and a case-control study among histologically confirmed stage II/III cases and matched controls recruited at Columbia University Medical Center. The aim of this study was to investigate whether plasma DNA methylation levels are appropriate surrogate biomarker of PCa tumor tissue levels and whether these markers are associated with worse clinicopathological tumor characteristics, which correlate with poorer prognosis. Quantitative pyrosequencing was used to detect methylation levels of p16 (CDKN4A), APC, GSTP1, and LINE-1 in 24 pairs of prostate tumor and adjacent tissues, as well as 27 plasma samples of PCa patients and 24 of controls. DNA methylation levels were significantly higher in tumor tissue than in adjacent nontumor tissue for p16 (CDKN4A), GSTP1, and APC; GSTP1 had a higher average percentage methylation in tumor tissue (38.9%) compared with p16 (CDKN4A) (5.9%) and APC (14.5%). GSTP1, p16 (CDKN4A), and APC methylation in tumor tissue was statistically significantly higher for cases with Gleason score ≥7 compared with those with Gleason score <7 [49.0% vs. 21.9% (p=0.01), 6.6% vs. 4.5% (p=0.04), and 19.1% vs. 7.4% (p=0.02), respectively]. Plasma LINE-1 methylation levels were higher in those with higher Gleason (67.6%) than in those with Gleason's below 7 (64.6%, p=0.03). Significant plasma-tissue correlations were observed for GSTP1 and LINE-1 methylation. These data, although preliminary, suggest that aberrant methylation may be a useful marker to identify PCa patients with clinically aggressive disease.     

Detection of MGMT, RASSF1A, p15INK4B, and p14ARF promoter methylation in circulating tumor-derived DNA of central nervous system cancer patients

Despite the growing understanding of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, cancers of the central nervous system are usually associated with unfavorable prognosis. The use of an appropriate molecular marker may improve the treatment outcome by allowing early diagnosis and treatment susceptibility monitoring. Since methylation of tumor-derived DNA can be detected in the serum of cancer patients, this makes DNA methylation-based biomarkers one of the most promising diagnostic strategies. In this study, the methylation profiles of MGMT, RASSF1A, p15INK4B, and p14ARF genes were evaluated in serum free-circulating DNA and the corresponding tumor tissue in a group of 33 primary or metastatic central nervous system cancer patients. Gene promoter methylation was assessed using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All the tested genes were found to be methylated to a different extent in both serum and tumor samples. In comparison to metastatic brain tumor patients, the patients with glial tumors were characterized by a higher frequency of gene hypermethylation. The hypermethylation of RASSF1A differentiated primary from metastatic brain cancers. Moreover, the gene methylation profiles observed in serum, in most cases, matched the methylation profiles detected in paired tumor samples.     

Epigenetic heterogeneity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: clues for clonal progression in prostate carcinogenesis

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostate adenocarcinoma, but the frequency and timing of epigenetic changes found in prostate carcinogenesis has not been extensively documented. Thus, the promoters of three genes (APC, GSTP1, and RARbeta2) involved in prostate carcinogenesis were tested by quantitative methylation-specific PCR in tissue DNA from 30 prostate carcinomas, 128 high-grade PIN lesions, and 30 normal prostate tissue samples dissected from 30 radical prostatectomy specimens using laser capture microdissection. The percentage of methylated alleles (PMA) was calculated for each gene, and hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define the degree of similarity of epigenetic alterations among the various samples. We found that PMA values of APC and RARbeta2 were higher than those of GSTP1 in all three types of tissue samples and median PMA values for all three genes were higher in prostate cancer. By cluster analysis, 26 of 30 prostate carcinomas and 82 of 128 high-grade PIN lesions were grouped in the "high methylation" branch, whereas 24 of 30 normal prostate tissue samples were allocated in the "low methylation" branch. Although high-grade PIN lesions are epigenetically more similar to prostate carcinoma than to normal prostate tissue, paired prostate carcinoma and high-grade PIN lesions did not always segregate together. We concluded that APC and RARbeta2 hypermethylation is frequent in normal prostate tissue and the progressive enrichment in cells carrying methylated alleles observed in high-grade PIN and prostate carcinoma is consistent with clonal progression. Because GSTP1 promoter methylation is mainly observed in prostate carcinoma and some high-grade PIN lesions, it represents an important marker for the transition of in situ to invasive neoplasia.     

Epigenetic alterations of CDH1 and APC genes: relationship with activation of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

Activation of canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast (IDCs) was recently reported from our laboratory. Herein, we analyzed promoter methylation status of CDH1 and Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes in 50 IDCs and correlated with expression of E-cadherin (E-CD) and APC proteins and with activation of oncogenic Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway components, Dvl, beta-catenin and CyclinD1. Further, Wnt/beta-catenin driven epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) was investigated by correlating the expression of Dvl, beta-catenin and CyclinD1 with vimentin expression in these IDCs. Promoter hypermethylation was observed in 25/50 (50%) IDCs for CDH1 and in 11/50 (22%) tumors for APC, associated with loss of expression of E-CD and APC proteins; concordant hypermethylation of these genes was observed in paired patients' sera. Further, 57% of tumors harboring CDH1 methylation and 50% tumors harboring the methylated APC gene showed nuclear localization of beta-catenin, suggesting activation of the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Our study demonstrates significant association between vimentin expression and nuclear beta-catenin (p=0.001; Odds ratio (OR)=25.6) and Dvl (p=0.023; OR=8.0), suggesting that EMT may be driven by Wnt/beta-catenin activation in IDCs. In conclusion, we demonstrate correlation of CDH1 and APC promoter methylation with loss of E-CD and APC proteins and with activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Association of nuclear Dvl and beta-catenin with vimentin expression suggests the importance of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway driven EMT in IDCs. The concordance between CDH1 and APC methylation in IDCs and paired circulating DNA underscores the utility of serum DNA as a non-invasive tool for methylation analysis in IDC patients.     

p16INK4a/Ki‐67 dual labelling as a marker for the presence of high‐grade cancer cells or disease progression in urinary cytopathology

E. Piaton, A. S. Advenier, C. Carré, M. Decaussin‐Petrucci, F. Mege‐Lechevallier and A. Ruffion
p16 ^INK4a /Ki‐67 dual labelling as a marker for the presence of high‐grade cancer cells or disease progression in urinary cytopathology Objective: Overexpression of p16^INK4a independent of the presence of E6–E7 oncoproteins of high‐risk papillomaviruses has been identified in bladder carcinoma in situ lesions with or without concurrent papillary or invasive high‐grade (HG) urothelial carcinoma. As p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 co‐expression clearly indicates deregulation of the cell cycle, the aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 dual labelling in urinary cytology samples. Methods: Immunolabelling was performed in demounted, destained Papanicolaou slides after ThinPrep^® processing. A total of 84 urinary cytology samples (18 negative, 10 low grade, 19 atypical urothelial cells and 37 high grade) were analysed for p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression. We assessed underlying urothelial malignancy with cystoscopy, histopathology and follow‐up data in every case. Results: Compared with raw histopathological results, p16 ^INK4a/Ki‐67 dual labelling was observed in 48 out of 55 (87.3%) HG lesions and in 11 out of 29 (37.9%) negative, papillary urothelial neoplasia of low malignant potential or low‐grade carcinomas (P = 0.05). All cases with high‐grade/malignant cytology were dual labelled. Sixteen out of 17 (94.1%) carcinoma in situ cases and eight out of 14 (57.1%) cases with atypical urothelial cells matching with HG lesions were dual labelled. Extended follow‐up allowed three cases of progression to be diagnosed in dual‐labelled cases with negative/low‐grade cytology results after a 9‐ to 11‐months delay. Conclusions: The data show that p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression allows most HG cancer cells to be detected initially and in the follow‐up period. Additional studies are needed in order to determine whether dual labelling can be used as a triage tool for atypical urothelial cells in the urine.     

RASSF2 methylation is a strong prognostic marker in younger age patients with Ewing sarcoma

Ras-association domain family of genes consist of 10 members (RASSF1-RASSF10), all containing a Ras-association (RA) domain in either the C- or the N-terminus. Several members of this gene family are frequently methylated in common sporadic cancers; however, the role of the RASSF gene family in rare types of cancers, such as bone cancer, has remained largely uninvestigated. In this report, we investigated the methylation status of RASSF1A and RASSF2 in Ewing sarcoma (ES). Quantitative real-time methylation analysis (MethyLight) demonstrated that both genes were frequently methylated in Ewing sarcoma tumors (52.5% and 42.5%, respectively) as well as in ES cell lines and gene expression was upregulated in methylated cell lines after treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxcytidine. Overexpression of either RASSF1A or RASSF2 reduced colony formation ability of ES cells. RASSF2 methylation correlated with poor overall survival (p = 0.028) and this association was more pronounced in patients under the age of 18 y (p = 0.002). These results suggest that both RASSF1A and RASSF2 are novel epigenetically inactivated tumor suppressor genes in Ewing sarcoma and RASSF2 methylation may have prognostic implications for ES patients.     

The study of hypermethylation in blood leukocytes of irradiated parents and their children

Background: Accumulation of evidence about the epigenetic regulation of genome function suggests the necessity to explore new aspects of the genotoxic action of radiation on the human body. Methodology: A methylation-sensitive PCR assay was used to analyze promoter methylation of p16/CDKN2A, p14/ARF, RASSF1A and GSTP1 genes in blood leukocytes from 103 unirradiated volunteers and 104 irradiated subjects (83 Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant liquidators and 21 nuclear specialists). Additionally, 21 families whose fathers were nuclear specialists were examined. Results: A significantly elevated frequency of individuals with abnormal methylation of p16/CDKN2A and GSTP1 genes was revealed in the exposed group compared to the control group (p = 0.0097 and p = 0.005, respectively). The occurrence of promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene significantly correlated with aging both in the control group (r = 0, 213; p = 0.006) and in the exposed individuals (r = 0, 212; p = 0,031). No methylated genes were found in the offspring of control families. Conclusion: Our study showed for the fist time that prolonged radiation exposure at low and medium doses is associated with hypermethylation of genes involved in the basic protective functions of cells; an effect that is persistent in blood leukocytes for significant periods after irradiation.     

Breast cancer diagnostics based on extracellular DNA and RNA circulating in blood

Extracellular DNA and RNA were extracted from blood plasma and cell surface-bound fractions of healthy women and patients with fibroadenoma and breast cancer. Frequency of methylation of RASSF1A, Cyclin D2, and RARβ2 genes was detected in the extracellular DNA using methylation-specific PCR. Methylation of at least one of these genes was found in plasma of 13% patients with nonmalignant breast fibroadenoma and in 60% of breast cancer patients. Employment cell-surface bound DNA as the substrate for PCR increased the detection frequency of gene methylation up to 87% in patients with fibroadenoma and 95% in breast cancer patients. In clinically healthy women the methylation markers have not been found in extracellular DNA. GAPDH, RASSF8, Ki-67 mRNAs, and 18S rRNA copies were quantified using RT-qPCR of extracellular RNA circulating in blood of patients with breast tumors and healthy controls. The major part of blood extracellular RNA is associated with cell surface. ROC analysis has shown that differences in concentrations 18S RNA, RASSF8, and Ki-67 mRNAs in blood plasma are highly sensitive and specific in discrimination of benign and malignant breast tumors. Thus, analysis of methylated forms of tumor suppressor genes in blood extracellular and quantification of specific extracellular RNA circulating in blood plasma may detect mammary gland tumors and discriminate malignant and benign neoplasms.     

Oncosuppressor methylation: a possible key role in colon metastatic progression

K‐RAS and BRAF gene mutations are mandatory to set anti‐EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Due to the relationship of these mutations with tumor epigenotype, we hypothesized the potential role of oncosuppressor methylation of genes involved in K‐RAS/BRAF pathway (CDKN2A, RASSF1A, and RARbeta suppressor genes) in inhibiting EGFR signaling cascade. Primary tumor and synchronous liver metastatic tissues of 75 mCRC patients were characterized for promoter methylation by QMSP and for K‐RAS and BRAF mutations. RARbeta, RASSF1A, and CDKN2A genes were methylated in 82%, 35%, and 26% of primary tumors, respectively. RASSF1A resulted significantly more frequently methylated in liver metastasis than in primary site (P = 0.015), while RARbeta was significantly lower methylated in distant metastasis (P = 1.2 × 10^?6). As regards methylation content, RASSF1A methylation status was significantly higher in liver metastasis with respect to primary tumor (P = 0.000) underlying the role of this gene in liver metastatic progression. In our series K‐RAS and BRAF were mutated in 39% and 4% of cases, respectively. Methylation frequencies seemed to be unrelated to gene mutations; on the other hand, RASSF1A mean content methylation resulted significantly higher in liver than in primary tumor (288.78 vs. 56.23, respectively, P = 0.05) only in K‐RAS wild‐type cases sustaining a specific role of this gene in metastatic site thus supporting its function in strengthening the apoptotic role of K‐RAS. These evidences held the role of oncosuppressor methylation in both colon tumorigenesis and progression and suggested that epigenetic events should be taken into account when biological therapies in mCRC patients have to be set. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 1934–1939, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Combined hypermethylation of APC and GSTP1 as a molecular marker for prostate cancer: quantitative pyrosequencing analysis

A total of 149 human prostate tissues obtained from our institute were assessed: 52 specimens of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and 97 specimens of prostate cancer (PCa). The methylation status of the genes of Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and glutathione-S-transferase-P1 (GSTP1) was analyzed by quantitative pyrosequencing. A methylation score (M score) was calculated to capture the combined methylation level of both genes. The methylation level of each single gene and that of both genes combined was significantly higher in PCa specimens than in BPH (each p < 0.001). The value of APC methylation, GSTP1 methylation, and M score for predicting PCa was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and reached 0.954, 0.942, and 0.983, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the M score in discriminating between PCa and BPH reached 92.8% and 100.0%, respectively. The M score was positively associated with the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (p trend < 0.001). Our study demonstrates that the quantitative measurement of two methylation markers might drastically improve the ability to discriminate PCa from BPH.     

Promoter methylation status of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes in neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia

A number of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes exhibit promoter hypermethylation with resulting gene silencing in human cancers. In addition, several gene promoters have also been shown to become hypermethylated in non-neoplastic cells during aging. To assess the physiological consequence and clinical significance of gene promoter methylation in gastric epithelia, our laboratory has studied the methylation status of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes, including APC, DAP-kinase, DCC, E-cadherin, GSTP1, hMLH1, p16, PTEN, RASSF1A, RUNX3 and TSLC1, in neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia. The tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes, except APC, were generally unmethylated in non-neoplastic gastric epithelia obtained from younger individuals. The frequencies of methylation increased with age to varying degrees in various genes, although GSTP1 and PTEN methylation was completely absent in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia. The methylation frequencies in each gene were found to be comparable in neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia, except the methylation of RUNX3 and TSLC1, which was mostly cancer-specific (P<0.01). When methylation frequencies were compared between non-neoplastic gastric epithelia from cancer-bearing and non-cancer-bearing stomachs, hMLH1 and p16 methylation was more frequent in those from cancer-bearing stomachs (P<0.01). Promoter methylation in tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes initially occurs in non-neoplastic gastric epithelia, increases with age, and ultimately silences gene function to constitute a field-defect that may predispose tissues to gastric cancer evolution. In clinical applications RUNX3 and TSLC1 methylation may be utilized as molecular diagnostic markers, and hMLH1 and p16 methylation as predictors of malignancy in the stomach.     

KIBRA gene methylation is associated with unfavorable biological prognostic parameters in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Ras-association domain family (RASSF) members are a family of genes containing an RA domain in either the C-terminus (RASSF1-RASSF6) or in the N-terminus (RASSF7-RASSF10). Members of this gene family are core members of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo (SWH) tumor suppressor network and have been shown to be involved in human tumorigenesis. Among the RASSF genes, RASSF1A is one of the most frequently methylated genes in a wide range of epithelial cancers, and we previously demonstrated that RASSF6 and RASSF10 genes are frequently epigenetically inactivated in acute leukemias, particularly in those of the B cell type. We here determined the methylation profiles of all members of the RASSF gene family as well as two recently identified (KIBRA, CRB3) upstream members of the SWH pathway in the leukemic B cells obtained from a well-characterized cohort of 95 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Among the RASSF genes, RASSF10 (50%) was the most frequently methylated gene, followed by RASSF6 (16%). The remaining RASSF genes were either unmethylated or showed a frequency of methylation < 10%. The upstream SWH member KIBRA was also frequently methylated in CLL (35%) in contrast to CRB3. Interestingly, the analysis of clinical-pathological parameters showed that KIBRA methylation was associated with unfavorable biological prognostic parameters, including unmutated IGHV genes (p = 0.007) and high CD38 expression (p < 0.05).     

Effect of aberrant promoter methylation of FHIT and RASSF1A genes on susceptibility to cervical cancer in a North Indian population

As current evidence suggests the involvement of epigenetic modification of tumour suppressor genes in human cancer, we investigated the aberrant promoter methylation of FHIT and RASSF1A genes in human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated cervical cancer in Indian women. We analysed 60 cervical cancer tissue biopsies of different clinical stage and histological grading and 23 healthy control samples with normal cervical cytology. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) was performed to analyse the methylation status of FHIT and RASSF1A genes and confirmed by sequencing. Both patients and controls were screened for HPV infection and 98% of the HPV-infected cases showed positivity for HPV type 16. Aberrant promoter methylation of the FHIT gene was found in 28.3% (17/60) of cases and of the RASSF1A gene in 35.0% (21/60) of cases; promoter methylation of both the genes was found in 13.3% (8/60) of cervical cancer cases. Methylation was significantly (p<0.01) associated with the cervical cancer cases compared with controls. None of the 23 controls was found to be methylated in either of these genes. This is the first study indicating a correlation between the promoter methylation of FHIT and RASSF1A genes and the clinical stage and histological grading of cervical carcinoma in Indian women. Future studies are underway to examine the practical implications of these findings for use as a biomarker.     

Detection of promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA of breast cancer cases and benign breast disease controls

Tumors are capable of shedding DNA into the blood stream. This shed DNA may be recovered from serum or plasma. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether pyrosequencing promoter DNA in a panel of 12 breast cancer-related genes (APC, BRCA1, CCND2, CDH1, ESR1, GSTP1, HIN1, P16, RARβ, RASSF1, SFRP1 and TWIST) to measure the degree of methylation would lead to a useful serum-based marker of breast cancer. Serum was obtained from women who were about to undergo a breast biopsy or mastectomy at three hospitals from 1977 to 1987 in Grand Rapids, MI USA. We compared the methylation status of 12 genes in serum DNA obtained from three groups of postmenopausal women (mean age at blood collection: 63.0 y; SD 9.9; range 35–91): breast cancer cases with lymph node-positive disease (n = 241); breast cancer cases with lymph node-negative disease (n = 63); and benign breast disease control subjects (n = 234). Overall, median levels of promoter methylation were low, typically below 5%, for all genes in all study groups. For all genes, median levels of methylation were higher (by 3.3 to 47.6%) in lymph node-positive breast cancer cases than in the controls. Comparing mean methylation level between lymph-node positive cases and controls, the most statistically significant findings, after adjustment of the false-positive rate (q-value), were for TWIST (p = 0.04), SFRP1 (p = 0.16), ESR1 (p = 0.17), P16 (p = 0.19) and APC (p = 0.19). For two of these four genes (TWIST, P16), the median methylation level was also highest in lymph-node positive cases, intermediate in lymph node-negative cases and lowest in the controls. The percent of study subjects with mean methylation scores ≥ 5% was higher among lymph node-positive cases than controls for ten genes, and significantly higher for HIN1 and TWIST (22.0 vs. 12.2%, p = 0.04 and 37.9 vs. 24.5%, p = 0.004, respectively). Despite relatively consistent variation in methylation patterns among groups, these modest differences did not provide sufficient ability to distinguish between cases and controls in a clinical setting.     

Aberrant methylation of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1 in tumor epithelium and tumor-associated cells in prostate cancer

The methylation status of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1, which are involved in prostate carcinogenesis, was studied in prostate tissue samples containing neoplasms. Malignant acini, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) foci, and stroma surrounding glandular structures of each type were detected in histological sections, using laser capture microdissection of prostate tissue. High levels of methylation were found in tumor epithelium and adjacent tumor-associated stromal cells. Epigenetic changes in the stroma are indicative of a major role of tumor microenvironment in cancer development and progression. The methylation status of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1 was also assessed in prostate biopsy material and operative tumor samples without laser capture microdissection. The methylation frequencies of all genes in tumor samples were considerably lower than those in microdissected tumor samples (HIC1, 71% vs. 89%; p16, 22% vs. 78%; GSTP1, 32% vs. 100%; and N33, 20% vs. 33%, respectively). It was concluded that laser capture micro-dissection is required in molecular analysis of tumors of this type.