Cranial neural crest recycle surface integrins in a substratum-dependent manner to promote rapid motility

Cell migration is essential for proper development of numerous structures derived from embryonic neural crest cells (NCCs). Although the migratory pathways of NCCs have been determined, the molecular mechanisms regulating NCC motility remain unclear. NCC migration is integrin dependent, and recent work has shown that surface expression levels of particular integrin alpha subunits are important determinants of NCC motility in vitro. Here, we provide evidence that rapid cranial NCC motility on laminin requires integrin recycling. NCCs showed both ligand- and receptor-specific integrin regulation in vitro. On laminin, NCCs accumulated internalized laminin but not fibronectin receptors over 20 min, whereas on fibronectin neither type of receptor accumulated internally beyond 2 min. Internalized laminin receptors colocalized with receptor recycling vesicles and were subsequently recycled back to the cell surface. Blocking receptor recycling with bafilomycin A inhibited NCC motility on laminin, indicating that substratum-dependent integrin recycling is essential for rapid cranial neural crest migration.     

ADAM13 disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains bind to the second heparin-binding domain of fibronectin

ADAM13 is a member of the disintegrin and metalloprotease protein family that is expressed on cranial neural crest cells surface and is essential for their migration. ADAM13 is an active protease that can cleave fibronectin in vitro and remodel a fibronectin substrate in vivo. Using a recombinant secreted protein containing both disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains of ADAM13, we show that this "adhesive" region of the protein binds directly to fibronectin. Fibronectin fusion proteins corresponding to the various functional domains were used to define the second heparin-binding domain as the ADAM13 binding site. Mutation of the syndecan-binding site (PPRR --> PPTM) within this domain abolishes binding of the recombinant disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains of ADAM13. We further show that the adhesive disintegrin and cysteine-rich domain of ADAM13 can promote cell adhesion via beta(1) integrins. This adhesion requires integrin activation and can be prevented by antibodies to the cysteine-rich domain of ADAM13 and beta(1) integrin. Finally, wild type, but not the E/A mutant of ADAM13 metalloprotease domain, can be shed from the cell surface, releasing the metalloprotease domain associated with the disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains. This suggests that ADAM13 shedding may involve its own metalloprotease activity and that the released protease may interact with both integrins and extracellular matrix proteins.     

Extracellular matrix and embryonal morphogenesis: role of fibronectin in cell migration

The neural crest provides a useful paradigm for cell migration and modulations in cell adhesion during morphogenesis. In the present review, we describe the major findings on the role of the extracellular matrix glycoprotein fibronectin and its corresponding integrin receptor in the locomotory behavior of neural crest cells. In vivo, fibronectin is associated with the migratory routes of neural crest cells and, in some cases, it disappears from the environment of the cells as they stop migrating. In vitro, neural crest cells show a great preference for fibronectin substrates as compared to other matrix molecules. Both in vivo and in vitro, neural crest cell migration can be specifically inhibited by antibodies or peptides that interfere with the binding of fibronectin to its integrin receptor. However, the migratory behavior of neural crest cells cannot result solely from the interaction with fibronectin. Thus, neural crest cells exhibit a particular organization of integrin receptors on their surface and develop a cytoskeletal network which differs from that of non-motile cells. These properties are supposed to permit rapid changes in the shape of cells and to favor a transient adhesion to the substratum. Recent findings have established that different forms of fibronectin may occur, which differ by short sequences along the molecule. The functions of most of these sequences are not known, except for 1 of them which carries a binding site for integrin receptors. We have demonstrated that this site is recognized by neural crest cells and plays a crucial role in their displacement. It is therefore possible that the forms of fibronectin carrying this sequence are not evenly distributed in the embryo, thus allowing migrating neural crest cells to orientate in the embryo. Fibronectin would then not only play a permissive role in embryonic cell motility, but have an instructive function in cell behavior.     

Role of adhesion molecules in the genesis of the peripheral nervous system in avians

In vertebrates, the peripheral nervous system arises from the neural crest by a multistep process involving epithelium-mesenchyme interconversions and cell migrations. These successive events are associated with profound and controlled reorganization of the expression of both cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesion molecules responsible for the direct interaction of neural crest cells with their neighbours or the extracellular matrix. Thus, at the onset of emigration of neural crest cells from the neural tube, the cell-cell adhesion systems mediated by N-cadherin and N-CAM are lost by cells. This is accompanied by the complete reorganization of the extracellular matrix in the immediate environment of neural crest cells and by changes in cell shape. Later, as crest cells undergo migration towards their differentiation sites, they are found associated with fibronectin. Cell adhesion molecules are reaquired by neural crest cells following specific sequences as they coalesce into primordia of the various ganglia. In vitro, fibronectin constitutes the most appropriate substrate for migration of neural crest cells. The migration-promoting effect of fibronectin can be specifically inhibited both in vivo and in vitro by antibodies to fibronectin, integrin receptors, or by peptides containing the Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser sequence. Neural crest cells recognize two major adhesion sites along fibronectin molecules; these are the Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser sequence located in the medial part of the molecule and the CS1 site situated in the alternatively spliced IIICS region. These two sequences are required to permit full motile behavior of cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Perturbation of cranial neural crest migration by the HNK-1 antibody

The HNK-1 antibody recognizes a carbohydrate moiety that is shared by a family of cell adhesion molecules and is also present on the surface of migrating neural crest cells. Here, the effects of the HNK-1 antibody on neural crest cells were examined in vitro and in vivo. When the HNK-1 antibody was added to neural tube explants in tissue culture, neural crest cells detached from laminin substrates but were unaffected on fibronectin substrates. In order to examine the effects of the HNK-1 antibody in vivo, antibody was injected lateral to the mesencephalic neural tube at the onset of cranial neural crest migration. The injected antibody persisted for approximately 16 hr on the injected side of the embryo and appeared to be most prevalent on the surface of neural crest cells. Embryos fixed within the first 24 hr after injection of HNK-1 antibodies (either whole IgMs or small IgM fragments) showed one or more of the following abnormalities: (1) ectopic neural crest cells external to the neural tube, (2) an accumulation of neural crest cell volume on the lumen of the neural tube, (3) some neural tube anomalies, or (4) a reduction in the neural crest cell volume on the injected side. The ectopic cells and neural tube anomalies persisted in embryos fixed 2 days postinjection. Only embryos having 10 or less somites at the time of injection were affected, suggesting a limited period of sensitivity to the HNK-1 antibody. Control embryos injected with a nonspecific antibody or with a nonblocking antibody against the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) were unaffected. Previous experiments from this laboratory have demonstrated than an antibody against integrin, a fibronectin and laminin receptor caused defects qualitatively similar to those resulting from HNK-1 antibody injection (M. Bronner-Fraser, J. Cell Biol., 101, 610, 1985). Coinjection of the HNK-1 and integrin antibodies resulted in a greater percentage of affected embryos than with either antibody alone. The additive nature of the effects of the two antibodies suggests that they act at different sites. These results demonstrate that the HNK-1 antibody causes abnormalities in cranial neural crest migration, perhaps by perturbing interactions between neural crest cells and laminin substrates.     

Molecular mechanisms of avian neural crest cell migration on fibronectin and laminin

We have examined the molecular interactions of avian neural crest cells with fibronectin and laminin in vitro during their initial migration from the neural tube. A 105-kDa proteolytic fragment of fibronectin encompassing the defined cell-binding domain (65 kDa) promoted migration of neural crest cells to the same extent as the intact molecule. Neural crest cell migration on both intact fibronectin and the 105-kDa fragment was reversibly inhibited by RGD-containing peptides. The 11.5-kDa fragment containing the RGDS cell attachment site was also able to support migration, whereas a 50-kDa fragment corresponding to the adjacent N-terminal portion of the defined cell-binding domain was unfavorable for neural crest cell movement. In addition to the putative "cell-binding domain," neural crest cells were able to migrate on a 31-kDa fragment corresponding to the C-terminal heparin-binding (II) region of fibronectin, and were inhibited in their migration by exogenous heparin, but not by RGDS peptides. Heparin potentiated the inhibitory effect of RGDS peptides on intact fibronectin, but not on the 105-kDa fragment. On substrates of purified laminin, the extent of avian neural crest cell migration was maximal at relatively low substrate concentrations and was reduced at higher concentrations. The efficiency of laminin as a migratory substrate was enhanced when the glycoprotein occurred complexed with nidogen. Moreover, coupling of the laminin-nidogen complex to collagen type IV or the low density heparan sulfate proteoglycan further increased cell dispersion, whereas isolated nidogen or the proteoglycan alone were unable to stimulate migration and collagen type IV was a significantly less efficient migratory substrate than laminin-nidogen. Neural crest cell migration on laminin-nidogen was not affected by RGDS nor by YIGSR-containing peptides, but was reduced by 35% after addition of heparin. The predominant motility-promoting activity of laminin was localized to the E8 domain, possessing heparin-binding activity distinct from that of the N-terminal E3 domain. Migration on the E8 fragment was reduced by greater than 70% after addition of heparin. The E1' fragment supported a minimal degree of migration that was RGD-sensitive and heparin-insensitive, whereas the primary heparin-binding E3 fragment and the cell-adhesive P1 fragment were entirely nonpermissive for cell movement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Cranial and trunk neural crest cells use different mechanisms for attachment to extracellular matrices.

We have used a quantitative cell attachment assay to compare the interactions of cranial and trunk neural crest cells with the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules fibronectin, laminin and collagen types I and IV. Antibodies to the beta 1 subunit of integrin inhibited attachment under all conditions tested, suggesting that integrins mediate neural crest cell interactions with these ECM molecules. The HNK-1 antibody against a surface carbohydrate epitope under certain conditions inhibited both cranial and trunk neural crest cell attachment to laminin, but not to fibronectin. An antiserum to alpha 1 intergrin inhibited attachment of trunk, but not cranial, neural crest cells to laminin and collagen type I, though interactions with fibronectin or collagen type IV were unaffected. The surface properties of trunk and cranial neural crest cells differed in several ways. First, trunk neural crest cells attached to collagen types I and IV, but cranial neural crest cells did not. Second, their divalent cation requirements for attachment to ECM molecules differed. For fibronectin substrata, trunk neural crest cells required divalent cations for attachment, whereas cranial neural crest cells bound in the absence of divalent cations. However, cranial neural crest cells lost this cation-independent attachment after a few days of culture. For laminin substrata, trunk cells used two integrins, one divalent cation-dependent and the other divalent cation-independent (Lallier, T. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1991) Development 113, 1069-1081). In contrast, cranial neural crest cells attached to laminin using a single, divalent cation-dependent receptor system. Immunoprecipitations and immunoblots of surface labelled neural crest cells with HNK-1, alpha 1 integrin and beta 1 integrin antibodies suggest that cranial and trunk neural crest cells possess biochemically distinct integrins. Our results demonstrate that cranial and trunk cells differ in their mechanisms of adhesion to selected ECM components, suggesting that they are non-overlapping populations of cells with regard to their adhesive properties.     

Neural crest motility on fibronectin is regulated by integrin activation

Cell migration is essential for proper development of numerous structures derived from embryonic neural crest cells (NCCs). Although recent work has shown that receptor recycling plays an important role in NCC motility on laminin, the molecular mechanisms regulating NCC motility on fibronectin remain unclear. One mechanism by which cells regulate motility is by modulating the affinity of integrin receptors. Here, we provide evidence that cranial and trunk NCCs rely on functional regulation of integrins to migrate efficiently on fibronectin (FN) in vitro. For NCCs cultured on fibronectin, velocity decreases after Mn2+ application (a treatment that activates all surface integrins) while velocity on laminin (LM) is not affected. The distribution of activated integrin beta 1 receptors on the surface of NCCs is also substratum-dependent. Integrin activation affects cranial and trunk NCCs differently when cultured on different concentrations of FN substrata; only cranial NCCs slow in a FN concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, Mn2+ treatment alters the distribution and number of activated integrin beta 1 receptors on the surface of cranial and trunk NCCs in different ways. We provide a hypothesis whereby a combination of activated surface integrin levels and the degree to which those receptors are clustered determines NCC motility on fibronectin.     

Evidence for collapsin-1 functioning in the control of neural crest migration in both trunk and hindbrain regions

Collapsin-1 belongs to the Semaphorin family of molecules, several members of which have been implicated in the co-ordination of axon growth and guidance. Collapsin-1 can function as a selective chemorepellent for sensory neurons, however, its early expression within the somites and the cranial neural tube (Shepherd, I., Luo, Y. , Raper, J. A. and Chang, S. (1996) Dev. Biol. 173, 185-199) suggest that it might contribute to the control of additional developmental processes in the chick. We now report a detailed study on the expression of collapsin-1 as well as on the distribution of collapsin-1-binding sites in regions where neural crest cell migration occurs. collapsin-1 expression is detected in regions bordering neural crest migration pathways in both the trunk and hindbrain regions and a receptor for collapsin-1, neuropilin-1, is expressed by migrating crest cells derived from both regions. When added to crest cells in vitro, a collapsin-1-Fc chimeric protein induces morphological changes similar to those seen in neuronal growth cones. In order to test the function of collapsin-1 on the migration of neural crest cells, an in vitro assay was used in which collapsin-1-Fc was immobilised in alternating stripes consisting of collapsin-Fc/fibronectin versus fibronectin alone. Explanted neural crest cells derived from both trunk and hindbrain regions avoided the collapsin-Fc-containing substratum. These results suggest that collapsin-1 signalling can contribute to the patterning of neural crest cell migration in the developing chick.     

Biologically active synthetic peptides as probes of embryonic development: a competitive peptide inhibitor of fibronectin function inhibits gastrulation in amphibian embryos and neural crest cell migration in avian embryos

We describe a new method for analyzing embryonic events dependent on a specific peptide recognition signal. A short, specific amino acid sequence in fibronectin has been implicated as a recognition site in fibronectin-mediated interactions. Fibroblast adhesion to fibronectin is competitively inhibited by certain synthetic peptides, including the decapeptide Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro-Ala-Ser-Ser-Lys-Pro, which appears to contain the cell recognition sequence. We found that this peptide inhibited both amphibian gastrulation and avian neural crest cell migration in vivo, as well as the attachment and migration of neural crest cells in vitro. These processes are major cell migratory events previously suggested to involve fibronectin. Negative controls included another conserved fibronectin peptide from the collagen-binding region containing the sequence Cys-Gln-Asp-Ser-Glu-Thr-Arg-Thr-Phe-Tyr and another peptide. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using synthetic peptides directed at recognition sites in extracellular proteins as probes of morphogenetic processes, and they provide further support for the hypothesis that fibronectin is involved in gastrulation and neural crest cell migration.     

Cloning and characterization of chicken α5 integrin: Endogenous and experimental expression in early chicken embryos

Key roles for fibronectin and its integrin receptors have been postulated in the multiple cell-matrix interactions essential for chick embryo morphogenesis. However, mechanistic studies of these processes have been hampered by the current absence of sequence data and chicken cDNA clones for the major fibronectin receptor subunit, integrin α5 (ITGA5). We report here the sequence, endogenous expression pattern, and transfection of full-length chicken integrin α5. During early chicken embryonic development, α5 is highly expressed in cranial neural folds and migrating neural crest cells, suggesting potential roles in neural crest formation and migration. In fact, over-expression of this integrin in early neural tube selectively induces BMP5, a growth factor recently implicated in neural crest formation. Availability of these α5 integrin tools should facilitate studies of its functions in early embryonic development.     

Analysis of neural crest cell lineage and migration.

In this review, we describe the results of recent experiments designed to investigate various aspects of neural crest cell lineage and migration. We have analyzed the lineage of individual premigratory neural crest cells by injecting a fluorescent lineage tracer dye, lysinated fluorescein dextran, into cells within the dorsal neural tube. Individual clones contained cells that were located in very diverse sites consistent with their being sensory neurons, prepigment cells, Schwann cells, adrenergic cells, and neural tube cells. These results suggest that some neural crest cells in the trunk and cranial regions are multipotent prior to their emigration from the neural tube. The environment through which neural crest cells move influences both the pattern and direction of their migration. We have shown that the sclerotomal portion of the somites are responsible for the rostrocaudal pattern of trunk neural crest cell movement, whereas the neural tube appears to govern the dorsoventral position of neural crest-derived ganglia. In addition, the notochord inhibits the movement of neural crest cells. In order to understand necessary cell-matrix interactions in neural crest migration, we have performed perturbation experiments, in which antibodies directed against cell surface or extracellular matrix molecules were introduced along neural crest pathways. We find that integrins, fibronectin, laminin, and tenascin all play some role in cranial neural crest emigration. Thus, multiple factors may be involved in controlling neural crest cell migration, and different factors may be important for migration in different regions of the embryo.     

The effect of tenascin and embryonic basal lamina on the behavior and morphology of neural crest cells in vitro

We have investigated the morphology and migratory behavior of quail neural crest cells on isolated embryonic basal laminae or substrata coated with fibronectin or tenascin. Each of these substrata have been implicated in directing neural crest cell migration in situ. We also observed the altered behavior of cells in response to the addition of tenascin to the culture medium independent of its effect as a migratory substratum. On tenascin-coated substrata, the rate of neural crest cell migration from neural tube explants was significantly greater than on uncoated tissue culture plastic, on fibronectin-coated plastic, or on basal lamina isolated from embryonic chick retinae. Neural crest cells on tenascin were rounded and lacked lamellipodia, in contrast to the flattened cells seen on basal lamina and fibronectin-coated plastic. In contrast, when tenascin was added to the culture medium of neural crest cells migrating on isolated basal lamina, a significant reduction in the rate of cell migration was observed. To study the nature of this effect, we used human melanoma cells, which have a number of characteristics in common with quail neural crest cells though they would be expected to have a distinct family of integrin receptors. A dose-dependent reduction in the rate of translocation was observed when tenascin was added to the culture medium of the human melanoma cell line plated on isolated basal laminae, indicating that the inhibitory effect of tenascin bound to the quail neural crest surface is probably not solely the result of competitive inhibition by tenascin for the integrin receptor. Our results show that tenascin can be used as a migratory substratum by avian neural crest cells and that tenascin as a substratum can stimulate neural crest cell migration, probably by permitting rapid detachment. Tenascin in the medium, on the other hand, inhibits both the migration rates and spreading of motile cells on basal lamina because it binds only the cell surface and not the underlying basal lamina. Cell surface-bound tenascin may decrease cell-substratum interactions and thus weaken the tractional forces generated by migrating cells. This is in contrast to the action of fibronectin, which when added to the medium stimulates cell migration by binding both to neural crest cells and the basal lamina, thus providing a bridge between the motile cells and the substratum.     

Cell surface beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase functions during neural crest cell migration and neurulation in vivo

Mesenchymal cell migration and neurite outgrowth are mediated in part by binding of cell surface beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase (GalTase) to N-linked oligosaccharides within the E8 domain of laminin. In this study, we determined whether cell surface GalTase functions during neural crest cell migration and neural development in vivo using antibodies raised against affinity-purified chicken serum GalTase. The antibodies specifically recognized two embryonic proteins of 77 and 67 kD, both of which express GalTase activity. The antibodies also immunoprecipitated and inhibited chick embryo GalTase activity, and inhibited neural crest cell migration on laminin matrices in vitro. Anti-GalTase antibodies were microinjected into the head mesenchyme of stage 7-9 chick embryos or cranial to Henson's node of stage 6 embryos. Anti-avian GalTase IgG decreased cranial neural crest cell migration on the injected side but did not cross the embryonic midline and did not affect neural crest cell migration on the uninjected side. Anti-avian GalTase Fab crossed the embryonic midline and perturbed cranial neural crest cell migration throughout the head. Neural fold elevation and neural tube closure were also disrupted by Fab fragments. Cell surface GalTase was localized to migrating neural crest cells and to the basal surfaces of neural epithelia by indirect immunofluorescence, whereas GalTase was undetectable on neural crest cells prior to migration. These results suggest that, during early embryogenesis, cell surface GalTase participates during neural crest cell migration, perhaps by interacting with laminin, a major component of the basal lamina. Cell surface GalTase also appears to play a role in neural tube formation, possibly by mediating neural epithelial adhesion to the underlying basal lamina.     

Alterations in neural crest migration by a monoclonal antibody that affects cell adhesion

The possible role of a 140-kD cell surface complex in neural crest adhesion and migration was examined using a monoclonal antibody JG22, first described by Greve and Gottlieb (1982, J. Cell. Biochem. 18:221-229). The addition of JG22 to neural crest cells in vitro caused a rapid change in morphology of cells plated on either fibronectin or laminin substrates. The cells became round and phase bright, often detaching from the dish or forming aggregates of rounded cells. Other tissues such as somites, notochords, and neural tubes were unaffected by the antibody in vitro even though the JG22 antigen is detectable in embryonic tissue sections on the surface of the myotome, neural tube, and notochord. The effects of the JG22 on neural crest migration in vivo were examined by a new perturbation approach in which both the antibody and the hybridoma cells were microinjected onto neural crest pathways. Hybridoma cells were labeled with a fluorescent cell marker that is nondeleterious and that is preserved after fixation and tissue sectioning. The JG22 antibody and hybridoma cells caused a marked reduction in cranial neural crest migration, a build-up of neural crest cells within the lumen of the neural tube, and some migration along aberrant pathways. Neural crest migration in the trunk was affected to a much lesser extent. In both cranial and trunk regions, a cell free zone of one or more cell diameters was generally observed between neural crest cells and the JG22 hybridoma cells. Two other monoclonal antibodies, 1-B and 1-N, were used as controls. Both 1-B and 1-N bind to bands of the 140-kD complex precipitated by JG22. Neither control antibody affected neural crest adhesion in vitro or neural crest migration in situ. This suggests that the observed alterations in neural crest migration are due to a functional block of the 140-kD complex.     

Attachment, spreading and locomotion of avian neural crest cells are mediated by multiple adhesion sites on fibronectin molecules.

Cellular adhesion to fibronectin (FN) can be mediated by several sequences located in different portions of the molecule. In human FN, these are: (i) the bipartite RGDS domain containing the RGDS cell-binding sequence functioning in synergy for full cellular adhesion with a second site (termed here the synergistic adhesion site) and (ii) the recently characterized CS1 and REDV adhesion sites within the alternatively-spliced type III homology-connecting segment. Using specific adhesive ligands and inhibitory probes, we have examined the role of each of these domains in the adhesion, spreading, and motility of avian neural crest cells in vitro. Both the RGDS domain and the CS1 adhesion site were found to promote attachment of neural crest cells, but only the RGDS domain supported their spreading. However, the RGDS sequence could mediate both attachment and spreading efficiently only when it was associated with the synergistic adhesion site. In migratory assays, it was found that both the RGDS domain and the CS1 site are required in association, each with functional specificity, to permit effective locomotion of neural crest cells. The REDV adhesion site was apparently not recognized by avian neural crest cells, presumably because this sequence is absent from chicken FN. Finally, it was found that recognition of both the RGDS domain and CS1 binding site by neural crest cells involved receptors belonging to the integrin family. From these results, we conclude that neural crest cells can interact with several binding sites of FN molecules, and use them for distinct functions. Our results also suggest the possibility of an instructive role for FN in the control of adhesive and migratory events during embryonic development.     

Inhibition of neural crest cell migration by aggregating chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans is mediated by their hyaluronan-binding region.

We have recently shown that the large hyaluronan-aggregating chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan from cartilage (PG-LA) is unfavorable as a substrate for neural crest cell migration in vitro and that this macromolecule inhibits cell dispersion on fibronectin substrates when included in the medium (R. Perris and S. Johansson, 1987, J. Cell Biol. 105, 2511-2521). In this study we present data on the specificity of the migration-repressing activity of PG-LA and data on the molecular mechanisms by which the proteoglycan might impair neural crest cell motility. Soluble PG-LA potently impaired cell migration on substrates of laminin/laminin-nidogen, vitronectin, and collagen types I, III, IV, and VI. When tested in solid-phase binding assays, PG-LA bound avidly to substrates of collagen types I-III and V. Conversely, minimal amounts of the proteoglycan bound to substrates of laminin-nidogen, vitronectin, collagen types IV and VI, and fibronectin or to a proteolytic fragment encompassing its cell-binding domain (105 kDa). Preincubation of these substrates with soluble PG-LA prior to plating of the cells had no effect on their locomotory behavior. These results indicate that PG-LA affects neural crest cell movement primarily through an interaction with the cell surface, rather than by association with the cell motility-promoting substrate molecules. The molecular interaction of soluble PG-LA with neural crest cells was further examined by analyzing the effects of isolated domains of the proteoglycan on cell migration on fibronectin. Addition of chondroitin sulfate chains, the core protein free of glycosaminoglycans, the isolated hyaluronan-binding region (HABr), or a proteolytic fragment corresponding to the keratan sulfate-enriched domain of the PG-LA to neural crest cells migrating on fibronectin or the 105-kDa fibronectin fragment had no significant effect on their motility. After reduction and alkylation, PG-LA was considerably less efficient in perturbing cell movement on fibronectin substrates and virtually ineffective in altering migration on the 105-kDa fragment. In the presence of hyaluronan fragments of 16-30 monosaccharides in length, or an antiserum against the HABr, the migration repressing activity of PG-LA was reduced in a dose-dependent fashion. Furthermore, the inhibitory action of PG-LA was significantly reduced by treatment of the cells with Streptomyces hyaluronidase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Angiopoietin 2 signaling plays a critical role in neural crest cell migration

Background

Collective neural crest cell migration is critical to the form and function of the vertebrate face and neck, distributing bone, cartilage, and nerve cells into peripheral targets that are intimately linked with head vasculature. The vasculature and neural crest structures are ultimately linked, but when and how these patterns develop in the early embryo are not well understood.

Results

Using in vivo imaging and sophisticated cell behavior analyses, we show that quail cranial neural crest and endothelial cells share common migratory paths, sort out in a dynamic multistep process, and display multiple types of motion. To better understand the underlying molecular signals, we examined the role of angiopoietin 2 (Ang2), which we found expressed in migrating cranial neural crest cells. Overexpression of Ang2 causes neural crest cells to be more exploratory as displayed by invasion of off-target locations, the widening of migratory streams into prohibitive zones, and differences in cell motility type. The enhanced exploratory phenotype correlates with increased phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase activity in migrating neural crest cells. In contrast, loss of Ang2 function reduces neural crest cell exploration. In both gain and loss of function of Ang2, we found disruptions to the timing and interplay between cranial neural crest and endothelial cells.

Conclusions

Together, these data demonstrate a role for Ang2 in maintaining collective cranial neural crest cell migration and suggest interdependence with endothelial cell migration during vertebrate head patterning.

     

Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis

Neural crest cells are pluripotent cells that emerge from the neural epithelium, migrate extensively and differentiate into numerous derivatives, including neurons, glial cells, pigment cells and connective tissue. Major questions concerning their morphogenesis include: (1) what establishes the pathways of migration? And (2), what controls the final destination and differentiation of various neural crest subpopulations? These questions will be addressed in this Review. Neural crest cells from the trunk level have been explored most extensively. Studies show that melanoblasts are specified shortly after they depart from the neural tube and this specification directs their migration into the dorsolateral pathway. We also consider other reports that present strong evidence for ventrally migrating neural crest cells being similarly fate restricted. Cranial neural crest cells have been less analyzed in this regard but the preponderance of evidence indicates that either the cranial neural crest cells are not fate-restricted or are extremely plastic in their developmental capability and that specification does not control pathfinding. Thus, the guidance mechanisms that control cranial neural crest migration and their behavior vary significantly from the trunk.The vagal neural crest arises at the axial level between the cranial and trunk neural crest and represents a transitional cell population between the head and trunk neural crest. We summarize new data to support this claim. In particular, we show that: (1) the vagal-level neural crest cells exhibit modest developmental bias; (2) there are differences in the migratory behavior between the anterior and the posterior vagal neural crest cells reminiscent of the cranial and the trunk neural crest, respectively and (3) the vagal neural crest cells take the dorsolateral pathway to the pharyngeal arches and the heart, but take the ventral pathway to the peripheral nervous system and the gut. However, these pathways are not rigidly specified because of prior fate restriction. Understanding the molecular, cellular and behavioral differences between these three populations of neural crest cells will be of enormous assistance when trying to understand the evolution of the neck.Key words: neural crest, morphogenesis, cell migration, chicken embryo, fate restriction, vagal neural crest, pathways