The effect of progestin and GnRH treatments on ovarian function and reproductive hormone secretions of anestrous postpartum suckled beef cows

Eighteen anestrous crossbred suckled beef cows were assigned to one of three treatment groups. Treatments were as follows: Group 1 cows (n = 3) were untreated and served as controls, Groups 2 cows (n = 6) were intramuscularly administered 250 mug GnRH, and Group 3 cows (n = 9) were subcutaneously administered a progestin ear implant for eight days prior to the administration of 250 mug GnRH. The GnRH was given to cows in Group 3 24 h after the time of progestin implant removal. Cows were 21 to 31 days postpartum at the time of GnRH treatment. The percent of cows that ovulated after the time of GnRH treatment was 0%, 83% and 100% for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For the cows that ovulated, more (P < 0.05) cows in Group 2 (80%) had abnormal luteal phases than in Group 3 (33%). The GnRH-induced LH release and peak LH concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) in the cows in Group 3 (214.3 +/- 37.1 ng/ml) than in the cows in Group 2 (142.7 +/- 19.0 ng/ml). The LH concentrations of the control cows remained very low throughout the sampling period. Although prostaglandin metabolite (PGFM) concentrations were not significantly (P > 0.10) different among groups, mean concentrations were higher and more variable for cows in Groups 1 (39.2 +/- 5.2 pg/ml) and 2 (39.4 + 6.1 pg/ml) than for cows in Group 3 (25.1 + 1.4 pg/ml).     

The effect of method of administration on ovarian responses of seasonally anestrous ewes administered gonadotrophin releasing hormone

Mature ewes were treated during the anestrous season with saline (I) or GnRH either intramuscularly in saline (II), subcutaneously in carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (III) or subcutaneously in gelatin capsules (IV). Fifty μg of GnRH or 1 ml of saline were administered to 22 ewes in experiment 1. In experiments 2 and 3, forty-seven and 10 ewes received 250 μg GnRH or 1 ml of saline. Ewes were bled for progesterone determination prior to treatment and up to 12 or 13 days after treatment. In experiment 3, ovaries were observed via mid-ventral laparotomy 4 days after treatment and ovarian structures recorded. Ewes were classified into one of four progesterone response categories: cyclic, transient, prolonged or no response. The only treatment that changed the progesterone response from the saline-treated controls was GnRH in gelatin capsules. More ewes in this group were classified with a prolonged progesterone response (40%) than in the saline control group (0%). GnRH (in gelatin capsules)-treated ewes in the prolonged progesterone response category had higher concentrations of plasma progesterone than GnRH (in saline or CMC)-treated ewes with a prolonged progesterone response. For the GnRH (in gelatin capsule)-treated ewes, the prolonged progesterone response was similar to progesterone in ewes during the estrous cycle and all ewes in the prolonged progesterone category had corpora lutea (experiment 3). In summary, implanting the GnRH in gelatin capsules subcutaneously in seasonally anestrous ewes increased the ovulation response and enhanced corpus luteum function over ewes administered GnRH in saline intramuscularly.     

The effect of short term calf removal in combination with GnRH treatment and the effect of limited nursing on reproductive performance of postpartum suckled beef cows administered PGF2alpha for ovulation control

Over a two year period, postpartum suckled Hereford and Angus Cows (n=213) were administered two injections of PGF(2)alpha (25 mg/injection) and divided into three groups. No additional treatments were administered to cows in Group I and calves were allowed to nurse their dams ad libitum. In Group II, calves were removed for 48 hours beginning on the third day following the initial PGF(2)alpha injection. These cows were given a subcutaneous injection of 250 mug GnRH dissolved in 2% carboxymethylcellulose midway through the 48 hour period. In Group III, calves were allowed to nurse their dams for only one hour per day for the first 7 days after the initial PGF(2)alpha injection. In year 1, PGF(2)alpha was administered 14 days apart whereas in year 2, PGF(2)alpha was administered 11 days apart. Cows were artificially inseminated at 72 and 96 hours after the second injection of PGF(2)alpha. In year 1, the numbers of cows that conceived to the timed inseminations were similar (P > .10) for the three groups. In year 2, a higher percentage of cows in groups II (P < .10) and III (P < .05) conceived to the timed inseminations than in group I. Other reproductive performance parameters were similar (P > .10) between groups for both years 1 and 2. In summary, limited nursing and short term calf removal in conjunction with GnRH treatment may improve the pregnancy rate in cows administered PGF(2)alpha for ovulation control.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during the periestrual and postinsemination periods in dairy cattle

Administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) improved conception rates in our previous studies. Our objective was to determine if the effect of GnRH was mediated through serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or by altered secretion of serum progesterone (P) and estradiol-17 beta (E) during the periestrual and post-insemination periods. Cattle were given either GnRH (n = 54) or saline (n = 55) at 72 h and inseminated artificially (AI) 80 h after the second of two injections of either prostaglandin F2 alpha or its analog, cloprostenol. Progesterone and E were measured in blood serum collected during 3 wk after AI (estrus) from 60 females. Blood was collected for LH determinations via indwelling jugular cannulae from 14 cows and 11 heifers. Collections were taken every 4 h from 32 to 108 h after the second PGF injection (PGF-2) (periestrual period) and at more frequent intervals during 240 min after administration of GnRH (n = 18) or saline (n = 7). Ten females had a spontaneous preovulatory LH surge before GnRH treatment (GnRH-spontaneous), whereas GnRH induced the preovulatory LH surge in six females. A spontaneous LH surge appeared to be initiated in two heifers at or near the time of GnRH treatment (spontaneous and/or induced). The remaining seven cows had spontaneous LH surges with no subsequent change in LH after saline treatment. Serum P during the 21 days after estrus was lower (p less than 0.05) in both pregnant and nonpregnant (open) cattle treated previously with GnRH compared with saline. Serum P during the first week after estrus was greater (p less than 0.01) and increased (p less than 0.05) more rapidly in saline controls and in GnRH-spontaneous cattle than in those exhibiting GnRH-induced or GnRH-spontaneous and/or-induced surges of LH. Conception rate of cattle receiving GnRH was higher (p = 0.06) than that of saline-treated controls. These data suggest that GnRH treatment at insemination initiated the preovulatory LH surge in some cattle, but serum P in both pregnant and open cows was compromised during the luteal phase after GnRH treatment. Improved fertility may be associated with delayed or slowly rising concentrations of serum progesterone after ovulation.     

Exogenous PGF(2)alpha enhanced GnRH-induced LH release in postpartum cows

This study evaluated the effect of exogenous PGF(2)alpha on circulating LH concentrations in postpartum multiparous (n = 32) and primiparous (n = 46) Brahman cows. The cows were randomly allotted within parity and calving date to receive 0, 1, 2 or 3 mg im PGF(2)alpha (alfaprostol)/100 kg body weight (BW), with or without GnRH on Day 30 after calving. Blood samples were collected at weekly intervals from calving through treatment. Serum progesterone concentrations were determined using RIA procedures to assure that only anestrous cows were treated. Sterile marker bulls were maintained with cows on Coastal bermudagrass pastures until the first estrus was detected. Multiparous cows had a shorter (P < 0.05) interval from calving to estrus than did primiparous cows. Serum LH was affected by time (P < 0.0001), PGF(2)alpha dose (P < 0.0002), GnRH (P < 0.0001), parity by PGF(2)alpha dose (P < 0.0003), PGF(2)alpha dose by GnRH (P < 0.0009), parity by GnRH (P < 0.0008), and by parity by PGF(2)alpha dose by GnRH (P < 0.0005). Multiparous cows not receiving GnRH had higher mean serum LH (P < 0.02), LH peak pulse height (P < 0.03), and area under the LH release curve (P < 0.03) compared with primiparous cows. The number of LH pulses/6 h was greater (P < 0.06) in multiparous than primiparous cows, and was greater (P < 0.02) in multiparous cows receiving 3 mg/100 kg BW than in cows receiving 2 mg/100 kg BW, but not in the controls or in cows receiving 1 mg/100 kg BW. Exogenous GnRH resulted in increased (P < 0.0001) serum LH concentrations in all cows, and LH was enhanced (P < 0.0009) by simultaneous treatment with PGF(2)alpha. Primiparous cows had a greater response (P < 0.0005) to PGF(2)alpha and GnRH compared with multiparous cows. Pituitary release of LH in response to GnRH was enhanced by simultaneous exposure to PGF(2)alpha in Day 30 postpartum cows.     

Ovarian responses of seasonally anestrous ewes administered progesterone,PMS, HCG and(or) GnRH

One hundred and sixty ewes were assigned to sixteen groups in a 2 × 2 × 4 factoral design and were treated during the anestrous season. The main effects were progesterone pretreatment (non-implanted and implanted for 14 days), PMS pretreatment (no pretreatment and pretreatment with 500 IU at the time of progesterone implant removal) and treatments (none, GnRH in saline, GnRH in gelatin capsules and HCG). GnRH in saline (250 μg) and HCG (500 IU) were administered intramuscularly and GnRH in gelatin capsules (250 μg) was administered subcutaneously 24 hours after the time of progesterone implant removal.Ewes were classified into one of four progesterone response categories: cyclic, transient, prolonged and no response. An injection of GnRH in saline induced a prolonged progesterone response in only one ewe (13%) which was similar to the response in the untreated ewes (0%). More ewes administered GnRH in gelatin capsules (56%) and more ewes administered HCG (89%) had a prolonged progesterone response than GnRH (in saline) treated or untreated ewes. A higher percentage of ewes that were pretreated with PMS and treated with GnRH in saline (78%) had a prolonged progesterone response than ewes treated with either PMS (22%) alone or with GnRH (in saline; 13%) alone.     

Reciprocal cross talk between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and prostaglandin receptors regulates GnRH receptor expression and differential gonadotropin secretion

The asynchronous secretion of gonadotrope LH and FSH under the control of GnRH is crucial for ovarian cyclicity but the underlying mechanism is not fully resolved. Because prostaglandins (PG) are autocrine regulators in many tissues, we determined whether they have this role in gonadotropes. We first demonstrated that GnRH stimulates PG synthesis by induction of cyclooxygenase-2, via the protein kinase C/c-Src/phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/MAPK pathway in the LbetaT2 gonadotrope cell line. We then demonstrated that PGF(2alpha) and PGI2, but not PGE2 inhibited GnRH receptor expression by inhibition of phosphoinositide turnover. PGF(2alpha), but not PGI2 or PGE2, reduced GnRH-induction of LHbeta gene expression, but not the alpha-gonadotropin subunit or the FSHbeta subunit genes. The prostanoid receptors EP1, EP2, FP, and IP were expressed in rat gonadotropes. Incubations of rat pituitaries with PGF(2alpha), but not PGI2 or PGE2, inhibited GnRH-induced LH secretion, whereas the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, stimulated GnRH-induced LH secretion. None of these treatments had any effect on GnRH-induced FSH secretion. The findings have thus elaborated a novel GnRH signaling pathway mediated by PGF(2alpha)-FP and PGI2-IP, which acts through an autocrine/paracrine modality to limit autoregulation of the GnRH receptor and differentially inhibit LH and FSH release. These findings provide a mechanism for asynchronous LH and FSH secretions and suggest the use of combination therapies of GnRH and prostanoid analogs to treat infertility, diseases with unbalanced LH and FSH secretion and in hormone-dependent diseases such as prostatic cancer.     

Follicular growth and ovulation in postpartum beef cows following calf removal and GnRH treatment

This study investigated the effects of calf removal (CR) and gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) administration on the duration of the postpartum anoestrous period in suckled beef cows. Experiment 1 involved 20 multiparous suckled cows that were assigned to each of two treatments on Day 61 postpartum: (i) unlimited access to their calves (C; n=10) and (ii) calf removal for a period of 96 h (CR96, n=10). Experiment 2 involved 24 multiparous cows that were assigned to each of two treatments on Day 63 postpartum: (i) CR96 (n=12); and (ii) CR96 plus 250 microg of GnRH administered on the day before calf return (CR96+GnRH, n=12). Experiment 3 was a 3x2 factorial experiment, involving 48 multiparous cows assigned to the experiment on Day 58 postpartum. The factors were C, CR96 and calf removal for 144 h (CR144), and 0 or 250 microg GnRH administered on the day prior calf return. In Experiment 1, the number of cows that ovulated within 12 days of calf removal was higher (P<0.05) in CR96 group (3/9) compared to the C group (0/10). In Experiment 2, all 12 cows in the CR96+GnRH group ovulated. In contrast only 4/12 cows in the CR96 group ovulated in response to calf removal. The diameter of the ovulatory follicle tended (P=0.06) to be smaller in CR96+GnRH cows (9.8 +/- 0.3 mm) than in CR96 cows (11.3 +/- 0.9 mm). The maximum diameter attained by the corpus luteum (CL) also tended (P=0.08) to be smaller for cows in the CR96+GnRH than for cows in the CR96 group (12.1 +/- 2.4 mm versus 16.7 +/- 7.5 mm, respectively). Plasma progesterone concentrations 12 days after calf removal tended (P=0.06) to be lower in CR96+GnRH cows than in CR96 cows (0.66 +/- 0.1 ng/ml versus 2.00 +/- 1.1 ng/ml, respectively). Few cows in the CR96+GnRH group regained normal cyclical activity and the interval from onset of calf removal to conception was longer (P<0.05) compared to cows in the CR group (52.2 +/- 5.7 days versus 20.0 +/- 6.6 days). In Experiment 3, 5/8 cows on the CR144 group and all 8 cows in the CR144+GnRH group ovulated. However, the interval from CR to conception was similar for all treatments. Temporary (96-144 h) calf removal, particularly in combination with GnRH treatment, can induce a high proportion of beef cows to ovulate, but the restoration of oestrous cycles may not be achieved.     

Ovulation rate after GnRH or PGF2alpha administration in early postpartum dairy cows

The objectives of this study evaluating induction of ovulation in early postpartum dairy cows were to: compare two methods of GnRH (100 mcg) administration (i.m. route and s.c. implant), and determine if prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) causes release of LH or ovulation similar to that reported for GnRH. In trial #1, serum LH peaked at 2h after i.m. administration of GnRH and was declining at 4h. The s.c. GnRH implant also caused an elevation in serum LH at 2 and 4h after treatment, with LH declining at 6h. Serum LH was unchanged in control cows. Experimental treatment caused ovulation in 4 of 14 GnRH i.m. treated cows, 4 of 12 GnRH implanted cows and 0 of 13 control cows. Parity had no effect on LH response but did affect resulting ovulation rate as multiparous cows were more likely to ovulate than were primiparous cows in response to either GnRH treatment. All cows that ovulated had a follicle larger than 12 mm at the time of treatment. In trial #2, serum LH increased as before after i.m. administration of GnRH, however, serum LH was unchanged in cows treated with PGF or saline. Gonadotropin releasing hormone caused more cows to ovulate than did PGF or saline treatments, and GnRH shortened the interval from treatment to the onset of CL function over the PGF treatment; 13.9+/-2.6, 28.2+/-4.1 and 22.3+/-4.1 days for GnRH, PGF and saline, respectively. In summary, there was no difference in the ability of s.c. implantation and i.m. administration of GnRH to cause ovulation. Prostaglandin F(2alpha) did not cause release of LH or ovulation. In 22 early postpartum dairy cows treated with 100 mcg GnRH i.m. in these two trials, nearly all cows (95%) responded with a release of LH but only 45% (10/22) responded with an ovulation and subsequent formation of a CL.     

The effect of timing of the induction of ovulation on embryo production in superstimulated lactating Holstein cows undergoing fixed-time artificial insemination

Two experiments evaluated the effects of timing of the induction of ovulation in superstimulated lactating Holstein donor cows that were fixed-time artificially inseminated. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effects of the timing of progesterone (P4) device removal (Experiment 1) or the addition of a second norgestomet implant (Experiment 2) during superstimulation. In Experiment 1, 12 cows were allocated to one of four treatment groups with the timing of P4 device removal (24 or 36 h) and pLH treatment (48 or 60 h), after the first PGF as main factors, in a Latin Square (cross-over) design. There was an interaction (P = 0.03) between time of P4 device removal and time of pLH treatment. Mean (± SEM) numbers of transferable embryos were higher when the P4 device was removed at 36 h and pLH was administered at 60 h after the first PGF (P36LH60 =6.3 ± 1.4) compared to other treatments (P24LH60 =3.7 ± 1.1; P24LH48 =2.4 ± 0.8; or P36LH48 =2.2 ± 0.7). In Experiment 2, 40 cows were randomly allocated into one of four treatments with the number of norgestomet implants (one or two) and the time of induction of ovulation with GnRH relative to the first PGF (48 vs. 60 h) as main effects. The mean number of transferable embryos was higher (P = 0.02) when GnRH was administered at 60 h (4.2 ± 1.3) compared to at 48 h (2.7 ± 0.8), and the number of freezable embryos was increased (P = 0.01) in cows receiving two (3.0 ± 1.0) rather than one norgestomet implant (1.5 ± 0.5). In summary, embryo production in lactating Holstein cows was increased when the ovulatory stimulus (pLH or GnRH) was given 60 h after the first PGF, particularly when the P4 device was removed 36 h after the first PGF and when two norgestomet ear implants were used during the superstimulation protocol.     

Timing of final GnRH of the Ovsynch protocol affects ovulatory follicle size,subsequent luteal function,and fertility in dairy cows

Synchronization of ovulation (Ovsynch) is an effective method for controlling time of first and subsequent AI in lactating dairy cows. However, validation of the original Ovsynch program did not include testing the optimal time to deliver the final treatment of GnRH. In Experiment 1, the effect of administering the final dose of GnRH on the same day as prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) administration was tested. Lactating dairy cows (n = 218) were randomly assigned to receive either Ovsynch (OV; cows were given 100 microg GnRH, then 7 days later cows were administered 25mg PGF2alpha followed by a subsequent treatment of 100 microg GnRH 2 days after the PGF2alpha or the modified version of Ovsynch (MOV; cows were given 100 microg GnRH, then 7 days later cows were administered 25mg PGF2alpha followed immediately with 100 microg GnRH). In both treatment groups, AI took place 16 h after the final administration of GnRH. In Experiment 2, cows (n = 457) were randomly divided into four treatment groups that were administered GnRH 0, 12, 24 and 36 h following PGF(2alpha). The 36 h treatment group served as control. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by palpation per rectum 36 days post-AI in Experiment 1 and by ultrasonography on Day 28 in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, pregnancy rate/AI (PR/AI) was greater (P<0.025) in OV versus MOV. In a subset (n = 85), percentage of cows with both synchronized ovulations and regressed CL following administration of PGF2alpha were similar (P>0.1) between OV and MOV, respectively. All cows that became pregnant in the MOV subset group showed regression of the CL in response to the PGF2alpha. Diameter of the ovulatory follicle at the time of final GnRH administration was greater (P<0.05) in OV versus MOV. In Experiment 2, the synchronization rate was once again similar among treatments (P>0.28). There was a linear effect of treatment on follicle size (P<0.05) and PR/AI (P<0.0001) as time increased between administration of PGF2alpha and GnRH, with the greatest PR/AI at 36 h. There was a trend for a greater percentage of cows with short luteal phases in the 0 h group (P<0.10). In summary, delivering the final treatment of GnRH of the Ovsynch program at the same time as PGF2alpha, or in the 24h following PGF2alpha, resulted in lower fertility compared to controls.     

Effect of timing of prostaglandin administration, controlled internal drug release removal and gonadotropin releasing hormone administration on pregnancy rate in fixed-time AI protocols in crossbred Angus cows

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of timing of prostaglandin F2(alpha) (PGF2(alpha)) administration, controlled internal drug release device (CIDR) removal and second gonodotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) administration on the pregnancy outcome in CIDR-based synchronization protocols. In Experiment 1, suckled Angus crossbred beef cows (n = 580) were given 100 microg of GnRH+a CIDR on Day 0. Cows in Group 1 (modified Ovsynch-P) received 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF2(alpha)) and CIDR device removal on Day 8 (AM), 100 microg of GnRH 36 h later on Day 9 (p.m.), and fixed-time AI (FTAI) 16 h later on Day 10 (47.5+/-1.1 h after PGF2(alpha)). Cows in Group 2 (Ovsynch-P) received 25mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 (p.m.), 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (66.6+/-1.2 h after PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 56.5% (170/301) for Group 1 and 55.6% (155/279) for Group 2, respectively (P = 0.47). In Experiment 2, beef cows (n=734) were synchronized with 100 microg of GnRH+CIDR on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 and either 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 (Ovsynch-P) and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (64.9+/-3.3 h from PGF2(alpha)) or 100 microg of GnRH on Day 10 (CO-Synch-P) at the time of AI (63.2+/-4.2 h from PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 48.8% (180/369) for Ovsynch-P and 44.7% (163/365) for CO-synch-P groups, respectively (P = 0.11). In both experiments, there was a locationxtreatment interaction (P<0.05); pregnancy rates between locations were different (P < 0.05) in the Ovsynch-P group. In conclusion, in a CIDR-based Ovsynch synchronization protocol, delaying administration of prostaglandin and CIDR removal by 12 h, or timing of the second GnRH by 16 h, did not affect pregnancy rates to FTAI. Therefore, there may be an opportunity to make changes in synchronization protocols with out adversely affecting FTAI pregnancy rates.     

Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services

To compare two intervals from the PGF(2alpha) injection to the second GnRH injection+timed artificial insemination (TAI) of Ovsynch, lactating Holstein cows received their first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch (n=352) and second and greater postpartum TAI after resynchronization of ovulation using Ovsynch (Resynch; n=458). Each week, cows housed in each of four breeding pens were randomized by breeding pen to receive the second GnRH injection of Presynch + Ovsynch or Resynch and TAI either 48 h (Cosynch 48; n=382) or 72 h (Cosynch 72; n=428) after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch or Resynch. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for cows receiving Cosynch 48 (29%) versus Cosynch 72 (33%). Furthermore, treatment did not affect P/AI for cows receiving first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch, for cows receiving second and greater TAI after Resynch, or the proportion of female calves born. In conclusion, delaying the second GnRH injection and TAI from 48 to 72 h after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch did not affect P/AI or calf sex ratio. The lack of a difference in fertility between these Cosynch protocols may offer more flexibility for implementing a systematic synchronization protocol when a Cosynch strategy is used.     

Simultaneous injection of PGF2alpha and GnRH into diestrous dairy cows delays return to estrus

Simultaneous injections of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) or saline were given to 32 diestrous dairy cows to test the ability of GnRH to improve estrous and ovulation synchrony beyond that of PGF alone. Cows were randomly assigned to receive PGF on Day 8 or Day 10 of the estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0), and all cows were further assigned to simultaneous injection of GnRH or saline. Corpus luteum (CL) regression, return to estrus and follicular activity were monitored by plasma progesterone assay, twice-daily estrous detection and ultrasonographic examination, respectively. Plasma progesterone concentrations declined to <1.0 ng/ml at 24 hours after PGF in all cows and were not affected by GnRH. Gonadotropin releasing hormone inducted premature ovulation or delayed return to estrus in 7 of 8 cows treated with PGF/GnRH on Day 8 and 3 of 8 cows treated with PGF/GnRH on Day 10. Further, cows with premature GnRH-induced ovulations failed to develop and maintain a fully functional CL, and all returned to estrus 7 to 13 days after the induced ovulation. These data indicate that GnRH administered simultaneously with a luteolytic dose of PGF disrupts follicular dynamics and induces premature ovulation or delays normal return to estrus and, therefore, does not improve the synchrony of estrus and ovulation achieved with PGF alone.     

Conception rates of dairy cows following early not-pregnant diagnosis by ultrasonography and subsequent treatments with shortened Ovsynch protocol

Our objective was to determine the feasibility of prompt reinsemination of dairy cows when diagnosed not pregnant 27-29 days after first-service timed AI (TAI). We assumed that a first-wave dominant follicle was present at that time that would ovulate in response to GnRH once precocious luteal regression was induced after administration of PGF(2alpha). Cows that had not been detected in estrus and reinseminated by Days 27-29 after a first-service TAI were diagnosed not pregnant by ultrasonography. Nonpregnant cows from three herds were assigned randomly to receive either no further treatment until reinsemination (controls; n=189); 25mg i.m. of PGF(2alpha) and then reinsemination according to detected estrus (81 of 108) or at 72-80h after PGF(2alpha) treatment (PGF) in the absence of estrus (27 of 108); or 25mg i.m. of PGF(2alpha) followed by 100 microg i.m. of GnRH 48h later (PGF+GnRH) and then reinsemination after detection of estrus (9 of 160) or at 16-20h after GnRH (151 of 160). Blood samples were collected at the time of the not-pregnant diagnosis and again 48h later. Concentrations of progesterone before treatment with PGF(2alpha) were elevated (<1ng/ml) in 61% of the cows when PGF(2alpha) was administered and 81% of the cows given PGF(2alpha) had low (<1ng/ml) concentrations of progesterone 48h after PGF(2alpha). Treated cows were re-inseminated earlier (P<0.01; 31+/-1days) after first-service TAI than controls (55+/-1days). Conception rates after treatment were not different among treatments: PGF (22%), PGF+GnRH (23%), and control (23%). Average intervals from calving to conception were 22-23 days less (P<0.001) in treated cows than in controls. We concluded that treating nonpregnant cows with PGF(2alpha) on Days 27-29 after insemination produced acceptable conception rates when inseminations were made after detected estrus or when TAI was used after GnRH treatment. Further, both treatments reduced days between first-service TAI and second inseminations, and days from calving to conception.     

Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH

This paper reports a new method for synchronizing the time of ovulation in cattle using GnRH and PGF(2alpha). In Experiments 1 and 2, lactating dairy cows (n=20) ranging from 36 to 280 d postpartum and dairy heifers (n=24) 14 to 16 mo old were treated with an intramuscular injection of 100 mug GnRH at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Seven d later the cattle received PGF(2alpha) to regress corpora lutea (CL). Lactating cows and heifers received a second injection of 100 mug GnRH 48 and 24 h later, respectively. Lactating cows were artificially inseminated 24 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovarian morphology was monitored daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography from 5 d prior to treatment until ovulation. In Experiment 3, the flexibility in the timing of hormonal injections with this synchronization protocol was evaluated by randomly assigning 66 lactating dairy cows to 3 different treatment groups. Lactating cows received the injection of PGF(2alpha) 48 (Group 1), 24 (Group 2), and 0 h (Group 3) prior to the second injection of GnRH, which was administered at the same time in each group to ensure the second injection of GnRH was given when follicles were at a similar stage of growth. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first injection of GnRH caused ovulation and formation of a new or accessory CL in 18 20 cows and 13 24 heifers. In addition, this injection of GnRH initiated or was coincident with initiation of a new follicular wave in 20 20 lactating cows and 18 24 heifers. Corpora lutea regressed after PGF(2alpha) in 20 20 cows and in 18 24 heifers. All cows and 18 24 heifers ovulated a newly formed dominant follicle between 24 and 32 h after the second injection of GnRH. Ten of 20 cows conceived to the timed artificial insemination. In Experiment 3, the conception rate in Groups 1 and 2 were greater than in Group 3, (55 and 46 % vs 11%, respectively). In summary, this protocol could have a major impact on managing reproduction in lactating dairy cows, because it allows for AI to occur at a known time of ovulation and eliminates the need for detection of estrus.     

Endocrine and ultrasound evaluation of the response to PGF 2alpha and GnRH given at different stages of the luteal phase in cyclic ewes

To investigate the effects of prostaglandin (PGF 2alpha) plus GnRH at different stages of the luteal phase 13 ewes received PGF 2alpha on Day 9 of the synchronized cycle, followed 36 h later by GnRH. This control regimen resulted in ovulation and normal corpus luteum (CL) function. In the next cycle, the ewes were treated simultaneously with PGF 2alpha and GnRH either on Day 4 (early, n = 7) or Day 9 (late, n = 6). Ovarian activity was monitored daily by ultrasonography, and blood samples were obtained to monitor hormonal patterns. Size of the largest follicle present when GnRH was administered was similar in all groups, but the preceding growth rate was greatest for the early group. In the 36 h after injection of PGF 2alpha, serum progesterone (P4) had declined to basal levels in the control cycles when GnRH was administered, but P4 concentrations were higher in the early group and were highest in the late group when the GnRH was administered with PGF 2alpha. The LH surges induced by GnRH were highest in the control cycles, and were lower in the 2 treated groups. In the early group, 6 of 7 ewes demonstrated ovulation within 48 h of GnRH, resulting in the formation of normal CL. In the late group, ovulation was delayed for about 5 d in 4 of 6 ewes, and subsequent luteal function was normal; no ovulation was detected in the other 2 ewes of this group, but the follicles became luteinized, resulting in a normal P4 profile in one and subnormal in the other. These results suggest that follicles present during the early luteal phase are capable of ovulating and forming fully functional CL in response to exogenous GnRH. In contrast, follicles present during the late luteal phase fail to ovulate in response to GnRH while P4 levels are high, even though the LH stimulus is adequate; however, these follicles persist and subsequently ovulate after P4 levels have decreased. Therefore, the endocrine milieu to which a follicle was exposed may be more important than its size in determining its ability to undergo ovulation and development into a normal CL.     

An alteration in the hypothalamic action of estradiol due to lack of progesterone exposure can cause follicular cysts in cattle

Many mammals, including cattle, can develop ovarian follicular cysts, but the physiological mechanisms leading to this condition remain undefined. We hypothesized that follicular cysts can develop because estradiol will induce a GnRH/LH surge on one occasion but progesterone exposure is required before another GnRH/LH surge can be induced by estradiol. In experiment 1, 14 cows were synchronized with an intravaginal progesterone insert (IPI) for 7 days, and prostaglandin F(2alpha) was given on the day of IPI removal. Estradiol benzoate (EB; 5 mg i.m.) was given 3 days before IPI removal to induce atresia of follicles. Cows were given a second EB treatment 1 day after IPI removal to induce a GnRH/LH surge in the absence of an ovulatory follicle. All cows had an LH surge following the second EB treatment, and 10 of 14 cows developed a large-follicle anovulatory condition (LFAC) that resembled follicular cysts. These LFAC cows were given a third EB treatment 15 days later, and none of the cows had an LH surge or ovulation. Cows were then either not treated (control, n = 5) or treated for 7 days with an IPI (n = 5) starting 7 days after the third EB injection. Cows were treated for a fourth time with 5 mg of EB 12 h after IPI removal. All IPI-treated, but no control, cows had an LH surge and ovulated in response to the estradiol challenge. In experiment 2, cows were induced to LFAC as in experiment 1 and were then randomly assigned to one of four treatments 1) IPI + EB, 2) IPI + GnRH (100 microg), 3) control + EB, and 4) control + GnRH. Control and IPI-treated cows had a similar LH surge and ovulation when treated with GnRH. In contrast, only IPI-treated cows had an LH surge following EB treatment. Thus, an initial GnRH/LH surge can be induced with high estradiol, but estradiol induction of a subsequent GnRH/LH surge requires exposure to progesterone. This effect is mediated by the hypothalamus, as evidenced by similar LH release in response to exogenous GnRH. This may represent the physiological condition that underlies ovarian follicular cysts.     

Effects of 72 hr calf removal and/or gonadotropin releasing hormone on luteinizing hormone release and ovarian activity in postpartum beef cows

A study was conducted to determine the pituitary and ovarian responses to 72 hr calf removal (CR) and/or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) in beef cows. Forty-eight Angus, Simmental, and Charolais crossbred cows in moderate body condition were allotted to an experiment of 2 x 2 factorial design involving CR and GnRH. At 30 to 32 days postpartum, calves were removed for 72 hr from the CR and CR plus GnRH groups. All cows were injected (i.m.) with saline or 200 mug of GnRH at 33 to 35 days postpartum. Saline or GnRH was injected 5 hr before calf return. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) was measured in blood samples collected every 30 min for 5.5 hr beginning 30 min prior to injection of saline or GnRH. Plasma progesterone was measured in blood samples collected 0, 7, and 14 days after GnRH injection and 7 and 14 days following the first detected estrus. There were no differences (P>0.05) in the interval to peak LH release or the magnitude of the LH release between the GnRH and CR plus GnRH groups; however, the GnRH induced release of LH was greater (P<0.05) over time when preceded by CR. Plasma progesterone concentrations were increased on day 7, compared to day 0, after GnRH injection in 57% and 50% of the animals in the GnRH and CR plus GnRH groups, respectively. However, behavioral estrus was not observed in any of the cows between days 0 and 7 after GnRH injection. A higher (P<0.05) percentage of the cows injected with GnRH formed luteal tissue compared to cows injected with saline; however, the luteal lifespan following GnRH injection was decreased relative to the luteal lifespan following the first observed estrus. The mean interval from calving to first estrus was decreased (P<0.05) by 17 days in the CR group relative to the other groups, and calf removal had no detrimental effect on milk production at 80 days postpartum or on calf weaning weights at approximately 7 months of age. In summary, 72 hr CR decreased the postpartum interval and increased the pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. Pretreatment with 72 hr CR did not alter circulating progesterone concentrations or luteal lifespan of corpora lutea induced by GnRH.     

Effect of sometribove administration on LH concentration in dairy cattle

Sixteen lactating, normally cycling Holstein cows were used to study 1) the effects of sometribove (recombinant methionyl bST) administration on basal LH concentrations and 2) the pituitary response to a GnRH challenge during the breeding period. The cows received a 3-injection regimen of PGF2a for estrus synchronization between 40 and 50 d post partum, and were assigned to a control group or to sometribove treatment (25 mg/d), which began 54 to 59 d post partum. Duration of the bST treatment was 24 d. On Day 10 of the estrous cycle following the third PGF2a injection, blood samples were collected to determine basal concentrations of LH. Immediately following this collection period, a GnRH challenge (100 mug) was used to measure the responsiveness of the pituitary based on the subsequent LH peak. Milk production of sometribove-treated cows increased 7% (2.1 kg/d) above that of the controls. Sometribove did not affect basal or GnRH-induced LH concentrations. Plasma progesterone concentrations during the luteal phase were similar between treatments. Sometribove increased milk yield with no apparent effects on basal or GnRH-induced LH concentrations during the breeding period.