Independent and coordinated functions of replication protein A tandem high affinity single-stranded DNA binding domains

The initial high affinity binding of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by replication protein A (RPA) is involved in the tandem domains in the central region of the RPA70 subunit (RPA70AB). However, it was not clear whether the two domains, RPA70A and RPA70B, bind DNA simultaneously or sequentially. Here, using primarily heteronuclear NMR complemented by fluorescence spectroscopy, we have analyzed the binding characteristics of the individual RPA70A and RPA70B domains and compared them with the intact RPA70AB. NMR chemical shift comparisons confirmed that RPA70A and RPA70B tumble independently in solution in the absence of ssDNA. NMR chemical shift perturbations showed that all ssDNA oligomers bind to the same sites as observed in the x-ray crystal structure of RPA70AB complexed to d(C)8. Titrations using a variety of 5'-mer ssDNA oligomers showed that RPA70A has a 5-10-fold higher affinity for ssDNA than RPA70B. Detailed analysis of ssDNA binding to RPA70A revealed that all DNA sequences interact in a similar mode. Fluorescence binding measurements with a variety of 8-10'-mer DNA sequences showed that RPA70AB interacts with DNA with approximately 100-fold higher affinity than the isolated domains. Calculation of the theoretical "linkage effect" from the structure of RPA70AB suggests that the high overall affinity for ssDNA is a byproduct of the covalent attachment of the two domains via a short flexible tether, which increases the effective local concentration. Taken together, our data are consistent with a sequential model of DNA binding by RPA according to which RPA70A binds the majority of DNA first and subsequent loading of RPA70B domain is facilitated by the linkage effect.     

Theoretical prediction of the binding free energy for mutants of replication protein A

The replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric (70, 32, and 14 kDa subunits), single stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein required for pivotal functions in the cell metabolism, such as chromosomal replication, prevention of hairpin formation, DNA repair and recombination, and signaling after DNA damage. Studies based on deletions and mutations have identified the high affinity ssDNA binding domains in the 70 kDa subunit of RPA, regions A and B. Individually, the domain A and B have a low affinity for ssDNA, while tandems composed of AA, AB, BB, and BA sequences bind the ssDNA with moderate to high affinity. Single and double point mutations on polar residues in the binding domains leads to a reduction in affinity of RPA for ssDNA, in particular when two hydrophilic residues are involved. In view of these results, we performed a study based on molecular dynamics simulation aimed to reproduce the experimental change in binding free energy, ΔΔG, of RPA70 mutants to further elucidate the nature of the protein-ssDNA interaction. The MM-PB(GB)SA methods implemented in Amber10 and the code FoldX were used to estimate the binding free energy. The theoretical and experimental ΔΔG values correlate better when the results are obtained by MM-PBSA calculated on individual trajectories for each mutant. In these conditions, the correlation coefficient between experimental and theoretical ΔΔG reaches a value of 0.95 despite the overestimation of the energy change by one order of magnitude. The decomposition of the MM-GBSA energy per residue allows us to correlate the change of the affinity with the residue polarity and energy contribution to the binding. The method revealed reliable predictions of the change in the affinity in function of mutations, and can be used to identify new mutants with distinct binding properties.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA: differential binding of the core domains and analysis of the DNA interaction surface

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric (70, 32, and 14 kDa subunits), eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein required for DNA recombination, repair, and replication. The three subunits of human RPA are composed of six conserved DNA binding domains (DBDs). Deletion and mutational studies have identified a high-affinity DNA binding core in the central region of the 70 kDa subunit, composed of DBDs A and B. To define the roles of each DBD in DNA binding, monomeric and tandem DBD A and B domain chimeras were created and characterized. Individually, DBDs A and B have a very low intrinsic affinity for ssDNA. In contrast, tandem DBDs (AA, AB, BA, and BB) bind ssDNA with moderate to high affinity. The AA chimera had a much higher affinity for ssDNA than did the other tandem DBDs, demonstrating that DBD A has a higher intrinsic affinity for ssDNA than DBD B. The RPA-DNA interface is similar in both DBD A and DBD B. Mutational analysis was carried out to probe the relative contributions of the two domains to DNA binding. Mutation of polar residues in either core DBD resulted in a significant decrease in the affinity of the RPA complex for ssDNA. RPA complexes with pairs of mutated polar residues had lower affinities than those with single mutations. The decrease in affinity observed when polar mutations were combined suggests that multiple polar interactions contribute to the affinity of the RPA core for DNA. These results indicate that RPA-ssDNA interactions are the result of binding of multiple nonequivalent domains. Our data are consistent with a sequential binding model for RPA, in which DBD A is responsible for positioning and initial binding of the RPA complex while DBD A together with DBD B direct stable, high-affinity binding to ssDNA.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 2. Characterization of double-stranded DNA-binding/helix-destabilization activities and the role of the zinc-finger domain in DNA interactions

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is composed of subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa. RPA is required for multiple processes in cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to (1) bind with high affinity to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), (2) bind specifically to certain double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) sequences, and (3) have DNA helix-destabilizing ("unwinding") activity. We have characterized both dsDNA binding and helix destabilization. The affinity of RPA for dsDNA was lower than that of ssDNA and precisely correlated with the melting temperature of the DNA fragment. The rates of helix destabilization and dsDNA binding were similar, and both were slow relative to the rate of binding ssDNA. We have previously mapped the regions required for ssDNA binding [Walther et al. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3963-3973]. Here, we show that both helix-destabilization and dsDNA-binding activities map to the central DNA-binding domain of the 70-kDa subunit and that other domains of RPA are needed for optimal activity. We conclude that all types of RPA binding are manifestations of RPA ssDNA-binding activity and that dsDNA binding occurs when RPA destabilizes a region of dsDNA and binds to the resulting ssDNA. The 70-kDa subunit of all RPA homologues contains a highly conserved putative (C-X2-C-X13-C-X2-C) zinc finger. This motif directly interacts with DNA and contributes to dsDNA-binding/unwinding activity. Evidence is presented that a metal ion is required for the function of the zinc-finger motif.     

Replication protein A as a major eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein and its role in DNA repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a key regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism. RPA is a highly conserved heterotrimeric protein and contains multiple oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding folds. The major RPA function is binding to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates forming in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Although binding ssDNA with high affinity, RPA can rapidly diffuse along ssDNA and destabilizes the DNA secondary structure. A highly dynamic RPA binding to ssDNA allows other proteins to access ssDNA and to displace RPA from the RPA–ssDNA complex. As has been shown recently, RPA in complex with ssDNA is posttranslationally modified in response to DNA damage. These modifications modulate the RPA interactions with its protein partners and control the DNA damage signaling pathways. The review considers up-to-date data on the RPA function as an active coordinator of ssDNA intermediate processing within DNA metabolic pathways, DNA repair in particular.     

Cellular functions of human RPA1. Multiple roles of domains in replication, repair, and checkpoints

In eukaryotes, the single strand DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is essential for DNA replication, repair, and recombination. RPA is composed of the following three subunits: RPA1, RPA2, and RPA3. The RPA1 subunit contains four structurally related domains and is responsible for high affinity ssDNA binding. This study uses a depletion/replacement strategy in human cells to reveal the contributions of each domain to RPA cellular functions. Mutations that substantially decrease ssDNA binding activity do not necessarily disrupt cellular RPA function. Conversely, mutations that only slightly affect ssDNA binding can dramatically affect cellular function. The N terminus of RPA1 is not necessary for DNA replication in the cell; however, this region is important for the cellular response to DNA damage. Highly conserved aromatic residues in the high affinity ssDNA-binding domains are essential for DNA repair and cell cycle progression. Our findings suggest that as long as a threshold of RPA-ssDNA binding activity is met, DNA replication can occur and that an RPA activity separate from ssDNA binding is essential for function in DNA repair.     

Functional analysis of the four DNA binding domains of replication protein A. The role of RPA2 in ssDNA binding

Replication Protein A (RPA), the heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein of eukaryotes, contains four ssDNA binding domains (DBDs) within its two largest subunits, RPA1 and RPA2. We analyzed the contribution of the four DBDs to ssDNA binding affinity by assaying recombinant yeast RPA in which a single DBD (A, B, C, or D) was inactive. Inactivation was accomplished by mutating the two conserved aromatic stacking residues present in each DBD. Mutation of domain A had the most severe effect and eliminated binding to a short substrate such as (dT)12. RPA containing mutations in DBDs B and C bound to substrates (dT)12, 17, and 23 but with reduced affinity compared with wild type RPA. Mutation of DBD-D had little or no effect on the binding of RPA to these substrates. However, mutations in domain D did affect the binding to oligonucleotides larger than 23 nucleotides (nt). Protein-DNA cross-linking indicated that DBD-A (in RPA1) is essential for RPA1 to interact efficiently with substrates of 12 nt or less and that DBD-D (RPA2) interacts efficiently with oligonucleotides of 27 nt or larger. The data support a sequential model of binding in which DBD-A is responsible for the initial interaction with ssDNA, that domains A, B, and C (RPA1) contact 12-23 nt of ssDNA, and that DBD-D (RPA2) is needed for RPA to interact with substrates that are 23-27 nt in length.     

DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A. 2. Characterization of DNA binding activity, protein interactions, and activity in DNA replication and repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of 70-, 34-, and 14- kDa subunits that is required for many DNA metabolic processes including DNA replication and DNA repair. Using a purified hyperphosphorylated form of RPA protein prepared in vitro, we have addressed the effects of hyperphosphorylation on steady-state and pre-steady-state DNA binding activity, the ability to support DNA repair and replication reactions, and the effect on the interaction with partner proteins. Equilibrium DNA binding activity measured by fluorescence polarization reveals no difference in ssDNA binding to pyrimidine-rich DNA sequences. However, RPA hyperphosphorylation results in a decreased affinity for purine-rich ssDNA and duplex DNA substrates. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis is consistent with the equilibrium DNA binding and demonstrates a contribution from both the k(on) and k(off) to achieve these differences. The hyperphosphorylated form of RPA retains damage-specific DNA binding, and, importantly, the affinity of hyperphosphorylated RPA for damaged duplex DNA is 3-fold greater than the affinity of unmodified RPA for undamaged duplex DNA. The ability of hyperphosphorylated RPA to support DNA repair showed minor differences in the ability to support nucleotide excision repair (NER). Interestingly, under reaction conditions in which RPA is maintained in a hyperphosphorylated form, we also observed inhibition of in vitro DNA replication. Analyses of protein-protein interactions bear out the effects of hyperphosphorylated RPA on DNA metabolic pathways. Specifically, phosphorylation of RPA disrupts the interaction with DNA polymerase alpha but has no significant effect on the interaction with XPA. These results demonstrate that the effects of DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of RPA on DNA replication and DNA repair are mediated through alterations in DNA binding activity and protein-protein interactions.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. III. Molecular basis of recognition of damaged DNA

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein (subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa) that is required for cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to interact specifically with damaged double-stranded DNA and to participate in multiple steps of nucleotide excision repair (NER) including the damage recognition step. We have examined the mechanism of RPA binding to both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (ssDNA and dsDNA, respectively) containing damage. We show that the affinity of RPA for damaged dsDNA correlated with disruption of the double helix by the damaged bases and required RPAs ssDNA-binding activity. We conclude that RPA is recognizing single-stranded character caused by the damaged nucleotides. We also show that RPA binds specifically to damaged ssDNA. The specificity of binding varies with the type of damage with RPA having up to a 60-fold preference for a pyrimidine(6-4)pyrimidone photoproduct. We show that this specific binding was absolutely dependent on the zinc-finger domain in the C-terminus of the 70-kDa subunit. The affinity of RPA for damaged ssDNA was 5 orders of magnitude higher than that of the damage recognition protein XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein). These findings suggest that RPA probably binds to both damaged and undamaged strands in the NER excision complex. RPA binding may be important for efficient excision of damaged DNA in NER.     

The role for zinc in replication protein A

Heterotrimeric human single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is a central player in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The C terminus of the largest subunit, RPA70, contains a putative zinc-binding motif and is implicated in complex formation with two smaller subunits, RPA14 and RPA32. The C-terminal domain of RPA70 (RPA70-CTD) was characterized using proteolysis and x-ray fluorescence emission spectroscopy. The proteolytic core of this domain comprised amino acids 432-616. X-ray fluorescence spectra revealed that RPA70-CTD possesses a coordinated Zn(II). The trimeric complex of RPA70-CTD, the ssDNA-binding domain of RPA32 (amino acids 43-171), and RPA14 had strong DNA binding activity. When properly coordinated with zinc, the trimer's affinity to ssDNA was only 3-10-fold less than that of the ssDNA-binding domain in the middle of RPA70. However, the DNA-binding activity of the trimer was dramatically reduced in the presence of chelating agents. Our data indicate that (i) Zn(II) is essential to stabilize the tertiary structure of RPA70-CTD; (ii) RPA70-CTD possesses DNA-binding activity, which is modulated by Zn(II); and (iii) ssDNA binding by the trimer is a synergistic effect generated by the RPA70-CTD and RPA32.     

Dynamic elements of replication protein A at the crossroads of DNA replication,recombination, and repair

Abstract

The heterotrimeric eukaryotic Replication protein A (RPA) is a master regulator of numerous DNA metabolic processes. For a long time, it has been viewed as an inert protector of ssDNA and a platform for assembly of various genome maintenance and signaling machines. Later, the modular organization of the RPA DNA binding domains suggested a possibility for dynamic interaction with ssDNA. This modular organization has inspired several models for the RPA-ssDNA interaction that aimed to explain how RPA, the high-affinity ssDNA binding protein, is replaced by the downstream players in DNA replication, recombination, and repair that bind ssDNA with much lower affinity. Recent studies, and in particular single-molecule observations of RPA-ssDNA interactions, led to the development of a new model for the ssDNA handoff from RPA to a specific downstream factor where not only stability and structural rearrangements but also RPA conformational dynamics guide the ssDNA handoff. Here we will review the current knowledge of the RPA structure, its dynamic interaction with ssDNA, and how RPA conformational dynamics may be influenced by posttranslational modification and proteins that interact with RPA, as well as how RPA dynamics may be harnessed in cellular decision making.     

DNA helicase RepA: cooperative ATPase activity and binding of nucleotides

The steady-state kinetic parameters of the ATPase activity of the homohexameric DNA helicase RepA and the binding of the fluorescent analogue epsilonADP to RepA have been studied. ssDNA stimulates RepA ATPase activity optimally at acidic pH 5.3-6.0. The sigmoidal kinetic curves in both the absence and presence of ssDNA show strong positive cooperativity for ATP hydrolysis, with oligonucleotides longer than 10mer optimal for ssDNA-stimulated ATPase activity. Fluorescence titrations show that, at 25 degrees C and in the absence of DNA, the binding of epsilonADP to RepA is biphasic with three high (K(1) = 1.54 x 10(6) M(-1)) and three low (K(2) = 4.71 x 10(4) M(-)(1)) affinity binding sites differing by 30-40-fold in binding constants. In the absence of cofactors, RepA melts cooperatively at T(m) = 65.8 +/- 0.1 degrees C and is more stable in the presence of ATPgammaS, T(m) = 68.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C (DeltaDeltaG 0.95 kcal/mol), than in the presence of ADP, T(m) = 66. 5 +/- 0.1 degrees C (DeltaDeltaG 0.29 kcal/mol), indicating that the additional phosphate group in ATPgammaS has a significant influence on RepA structure. A model is proposed in which individual subunits of RepA sequentially and cooperatively perform a multistep ATP hydrolytic cycle.     

Analysis of the human replication protein A:Rad52 complex: evidence for crosstalk between RPA32, RPA70, Rad52 and DNA

The eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), is essential for DNA replication, and plays important roles in DNA repair and DNA recombination. Rad52 and RPA, along with other members of the Rad52 epistasis group of genes, repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). Two repair pathways involve RPA and Rad52, homologous recombination and single-strand annealing. Two binding sites for Rad52 have been identified on RPA. They include the previously identified C-terminal domain (CTD) of RPA32 (residues 224-271) and the newly identified domain containing residues 169-326 of RPA70. A region on Rad52, which includes residues 218-303, binds RPA70 as well as RPA32. The N-terminal region of RPA32 does not appear to play a role in the formation of the RPA:Rad52 complex. It appears that the RPA32CTD can substitute for RPA70 in binding Rad52. Sequence homology between RPA32 and RPA70 was used to identify a putative Rad52-binding site on RPA70 that is located near DNA-binding domains A and B. Rad52 binding to RPA increases ssDNA affinity significantly. Mutations in DBD-D on RPA32 show that this domain is primarily responsible for the ssDNA binding enhancement. RPA binding to Rad52 inhibits the higher-order self-association of Rad52 rings. Implications for these results for the "hand-off" mechanism between protein-protein partners, including Rad51, in homologous recombination and single-strand annealing are discussed.     

Structure of the full-length human RPA14/32 complex gives insights into the mechanism of DNA binding and complex formation

Replication protein A (RPA) is the ubiquitous, eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein and is essential for DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Here, crystal structures of the soluble RPA heterodimer, composed of the RPA14 and RPA32 subunits, have been determined for the full-length protein in multiple crystal forms. In all crystals, the electron density for the N-terminal (residues 1-42) and C-terminal (residues 175-270) regions of RPA32 is weak and of poor quality indicating that these regions are disordered and/or assume multiple positions in the crystals. Hence, the RPA32 N terminus, that is hyperphosphorylated in a cell-cycle-dependent manner and in response to DNA damaging agents, appears to be inherently disordered in the unphosphorylated state. The C-terminal, winged helix-loop-helix, protein-protein interaction domain adopts several conformations perhaps to facilitate its interaction with various proteins. Although the ordered regions of RPA14/32 resemble the previously solved protease-resistant core crystal structure, the quaternary structures between the heterodimers are quite different. Thus, the four-helix bundle quaternary assembly noted in the original core structure is unlikely to be related to the quaternary structure of the intact heterotrimer. An organic ligand binding site between subunits RPA14 and RPA32 was identified to bind dioxane. Comparison of the ssDNA binding surfaces of RPA70 with RPA14/32 showed that the lower affinity of RPA14/32 can be attributed to a shallower binding crevice with reduced positive electrostatic charge.     

Interactions of cytochrome c with DNA at glassy carbon surface

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to investigate the interactions of Cytochrome c (Cyt c) with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) at glassy carbon (GC) electrodes. The results indicate that there are strong interactions between Cyt c and DNA. The binding constant (k(A)) and binding free energy (Delta(r)G) of Cyt c with dsDNA are (1.69+/-0.38) x 10(5) L.mol(-1) and -(29.76+/-0.56) kJ.mol(-1), respectively; and those of Cyt c with ssDNA are (3.35+/-0.50) x 10(5) L.mol(-1) and -(31.49+/-0.37) kJ.mol(-1), respectively. The binding sites are achieved to be 3.3 bp per Cyt c molecule with dsDNA and 4.0 nucleotides (ssDNA) binding one Cyt c molecule. This experiment affords a valid method for investigating the interactions between DNA and proteins by electrochemical techniques.     

Reciprocal cooperative effects of multiple ligand binding to pyruvate kinase

The formation of multiple ligand complexes with muscle pyruvate kinase was measured in terms of dissociation constants and the standard free energies of formation were calculated. The binding of Mn2+ to the enzyme (KA = 55 +/- 5 X 10(-6) M; deltaF degrees = -5.75 +/- 0.05 kcal/mol) and to the enzyme saturated with phosphoenolpyruvate (conditional free energy) KA' = 0.8 +/- 0.4 X 10(-6) M; deltaF degrees = -8.22 +/- 0.34 kcal/mol) has been measured under identical conditions giving a free energy of coupling, delta(deltaF degrees) = -2.47 +/- 0.34 kcal/mol. Such a large negative free energy of coupling is diagnostic of a strong positively cooperative effect in ligand binding. The binding of the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate to free enzyme and the enzyme-Mn2+ complex was, by necessity, measured by different methods. The free energy of phosphoenolpyruvate binding to free enzyme (KS = 1.58 +/- 0.10 X 10(-4)M; deltaF degrees = -5.13 +/- 0.04 kcal/mol) and to the enzyme-Mn2+ complex (K3 = 0.75 +/- 0.10 X 10(-6)M; deltaF degrees = -8.26 +/- 0.07 kcal/mol) also gives a large negative free energy of coupling, delta(deltaF degrees) = -3.16 +/- 0.08 kcal/mol. Such a large negative value confirms reciprocal binding effects between the divalent cation and the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate. The binding of Mn2+ to the enzyme-ADP complex was also investigated and a free energy of coupling, delta(deltaF degrees) = -0.08 +/- 0.08 kcal/mol, was measured, indicative of little or no cooperativity in binding. The free energy of coupling with Mn2+ and pyruvate was measured as -1.52 +/- 0.14 kcal/mol, showing a significant amount of cooperativity in ligand binding but a substantially smaller effect than that observed for phosphoenolpyruvate binding. The magnitude of the coupling free energy may be related to the role of the divalent cation in the formation of the enzyme-substrate complexes. In the absence of the activating monovalent cation, the coupling free energies for phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate binding decrease by 40-60% and 25%, respectively, substantiating a role for the monovalent cation in the formation of enzyme-substrate complexes with phosphoenolpyruvate and with pyruvate.     

Structural mechanism of RPA loading on DNA during activation of a simple pre-replication complex

We report that during activation of the simian virus 40 (SV40) pre-replication complex, SV40 T antigen (Tag) helicase actively loads replication protein A (RPA) on emerging single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). This novel loading process requires physical interaction of Tag origin DNA-binding domain (OBD) with the RPA high-affinity ssDNA-binding domains (RPA70AB). Heteronuclear NMR chemical shift mapping revealed that Tag-OBD binds to RPA70AB at a site distal from the ssDNA-binding sites and that RPA70AB, Tag-OBD, and an 8-nucleotide ssDNA form a stable ternary complex. Intact RPA and Tag also interact stably in the presence of an 8-mer, but Tag dissociates from the complex when RPA binds to longer oligonucleotides. Together, our results imply that an allosteric change in RPA quaternary structure completes the loading reaction. A mechanistic model is proposed in which the ternary complex is a key intermediate that directly couples origin DNA unwinding to RPA loading on emerging ssDNA.     

RPA phosphorylation in mitosis alters DNA binding and protein-protein interactions

The heterotrimeric DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), consists of 70-, 34-, and 14-kDa subunits and is involved in maintaining genomic stability by playing key roles in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. RPA participates in these processes through its interaction with other proteins and its strong affinity for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). RPA-p34 is phosphorylated in a cell-cycle-dependent fashion primarily at Ser-29 and Ser-23, which are consensus sites for Cdc2 cyclin-dependent kinase. By systematically examining RPA-p34 phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle, we have found there are distinct phosphorylated forms of RPA-p34 in different cell-cycle stages. We have isolated and purified a unique phosphorylated form of RPA that is specifically associated with the mitotic phase of the cell cycle. The mitotic form of RPA (m-hRPA) shows no difference in ssDNA binding activity as compared with recombinant RPA (r-hRPA), yet binds less efficiently to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). These data suggest that mitotic phosphorylation of RPA-p34 inhibits the destabilization of dsDNA by RPA complex, thereby decreasing the binding affinity for dsDNA. The m-hRPA also exhibits altered interactions with certain DNA replication and repair proteins. Using highly purified proteins, m-hRPA exhibited decreased binding to ATM, DNA pol alpha, and DNA-PK as compared to unphosphorylated recombinant RPA (r-hRPA). Dephosphorylation of m-hRPA was able to restore the interaction with each of these proteins. Interestingly, the interaction of RPA with XPA was not altered by RPA phosphorylation. These data suggest that phosphorylation of RPA-p34 plays an important role in regulating RPA functions in DNA metabolism by altering specific protein-protein interactions.     

Association of the AB and CD-EF domains from rat alpha- and beta-parvalbumin

Association of the parvalbumin AB and CD-EF domains was examined in Hepes-buffered saline, pH 7.4, employing fragments from rat alpha and beta. All of the interactions require Ca(2+). In saturating Ca(2+), the alpha AB/alpha CD-EF (alpha/alpha) complex displays an association constant of (7.6 +/- 0.4) x 10(7) M(-1). Ca(2+)-binding data for a mixture of the alpha fragments are compatible with an identical two-site model, yielding an average binding constant of (8.5 +/- 0.2) x 10(5) M(-1). The beta/beta interaction is significantly weaker, exhibiting an association constant of (3.0 +/- 0.6) x 10(6) M(-1). The Ca(2+)-binding constants for beta/beta are likewise diminished, at (1.0 +/- 0.1) x 10(5) and (2.3 +/- 0.2) x 10(4) M(-1). The magnitude of the apparent DeltaDeltaG(degree)' for Ca(2+) binding by alpha/alpha and beta/beta, at 3.4 kcal/mol, approaches that measured for the intact proteins (3.6 kcal/mol) and is substantially larger than the 1.5 kcal/mol value previously measured for the isolated CD-EF domains. This result suggests that the AB domain can modulate the Ca(2+) affinities of the CD and EF sites. Interestingly, the heterologous alpha/beta complex displays a larger association constant [(6.6 +/- 0.4) x 10(6) M(-1)] than the homologous beta/beta complex and heightened Ca(2+) affinity [binding constants of (1.3 +/- 0.1) x 10(6) and (8.8 +/- 0.2) x 10(4) M(-1)]. By contrast, beta/alpha associates more weakly than alpha/alpha and exhibits sharply reduced affinity for Ca(2+). Thus, the interaction between the beta AB domain and beta CD-EF domain may act to attenuate Ca(2+) affinity in the intact protein.