Combination of active specific immunotherapy or adoptive antibody or lymphocyte immunotherapy with chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer

Successful treatment of cancer patients with a combination of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and chemotherapeutic drugs has spawned various other forms of additional combination therapies, including vaccines or adoptive lymphocyte transfer combined with chemotherapeutics. These therapies were effective against established tumors in animal models and showed promising results in initial clinical trials in cancer patients, awaiting testing in larger randomized controlled studies. Although combination between immunotherapy and chemotherapy has long been viewed as incompatible as chemotherapy, especially in high doses meant to increase anti-tumor efficacy, has induced immunosuppression, various mechanisms may explain the reported synergistic effects of the two types of therapies. Thus direct effects of chemotherapy on tumor or host environment, such as induction of tumor cell death, elimination of regulatory T cells, and/or enhancement of tumor cell sensitivity to lysis by CTL may account for enhancement of immunotherapy by chemotherapy. Furthermore, induction of lymphopenia by chemotherapy has increased the efficacy of adoptive lymphocyte transfer in cancer patients. On the other hand, immunotherapy may directly modulate the tumor’s sensitivity to chemotherapy. Thus, anti-tumor mAb can increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs and patients treated first with immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy showed higher clinical response rates than patients that had received chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, combination of active specific immunotherapy or adoptive mAb or lymphocyte immunotherapy with chemotherapy has great potential for the treatment of cancer patients which needs to be confirmed in larger controlled and randomized Phase III trials.     

Combinatorial treatments including vaccines,chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy

Accumulating evidence suggests that despite the potency of cytotoxic anticancer agents, and the great specificity that can be achieved with immunotherapy, neither of these two types of treatment by itself has been sufficient to eradicate the disease. Still, the combination of these two different modalities holds enormous potential for eliciting therapeutic results. Indeed, certain chemotherapeutic agents have shown immunomodulatory activities, and several combined approaches have already been attempted. For instance, chemotherapy has been proven to enhance the efficacy of tumor cell vaccines, and to favor the activity of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells. A number of mechanisms have been proposed for the chemotherapy-triggered enhancement of immunotherapy response. Thus, chemotherapy may favor tumor cell death, and by that enhance tumor-antigen cross-presentation in vivo. Drug-induced myelosuppression may induce the production of cytokines favoring homeostatic proliferation, and/or ablate immunosuppression mechanisms. Furthermore, the recently reported synergy between monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy or peptide vaccination is based upon the induction of endogenous humoral and cellular immune responses. This would suggest that monoclonal antibodies may not only provide passive immunotherapy but can also promote tumor-specific active immunity. This article will review several strategies in which immunotherapy can be exploited in preclinical and clinical studies in combination with other agents and therapeutic modalities that are quite unique when compared with “conventional” combination therapies (ie, treatments with chemotherapeutic drugs or chemotherapy and radiotherapy based protocols). The results from these studies may have significant implications for the development of new protocols based on combinatorial treatments including vaccines, chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, suggesting an exciting potential for therapeutic synergy with general applicability to various cancer types. Given the complicity of immune-based therapies and cancer pharmacology, it will be necessary to bring together cancer immunologists and clinicians, so as to provide a robust stimulus for realizing the successful management of cancer in the near future.     

Results of randomized trials of immunotherapy for acute leukemia

Summary For more than a decade clinical trials have attempted to define the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. Based on animal studies which indicated that non-specific immune stimulation had an antitumor effect if the tumor burden was small, the use of immunotherapy during remission in patients with acute leukemia seemed appropriate following the initial report of the success of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in prolonging remission duration and survival in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Therefore a series of randomized clinical trials was initiated to confirm these original observations. In four studies comparing BCG inoculations, with or without allogeneic leukemia cells, and chemotherapy or no therapy, no advantage of immunotherapy was noted. Immunotherapy appeared to be equally as good as chemotherapy. A combination of BCG and chemotherapy showed some advantage in one study, but no advantage was noted in two other studies.In acute myeloblastic leukemia several randomized trials suggested that BCG or one of its derivatives when given alone, in combination with allogeneic cells, or with chemotherapy had a marginal effect in prolonging remission duration and survival when compared to chemotherapy or rno therapy.In conclusion, immunotherapy during remission has marginal activity in acute leukemia.     

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the industrialized world. Most cancer patients are treated by a combination of surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Whereas the primary tumor can, in most cases, be efficiently treated by a combination of these standard therapies, preventing the metastatic spread of the disease through disseminated tumor cells is often not effective. The eradication of disseminated tumor cells present in the blood circulation and micro-metastases in distant organs therefore represents another promising approach in cancer immunotherapy. Main strategies of cancer immunotherapy aim at exploiting the therapeutic potential of tumor-specific antibodies and cellular immune effector mechanisms. Whereas passive antibody therapy relies on the repeated application of large quantities of tumor antigen-specific antibodies, active immunotherapy aims at the generation of a tumor-specific immune response combining both humoral and cytotoxic T cell effector mechanisms by the host's immune system following vaccination. In the first part of this review, concurrent developments in active and passive cancer immunotherapy are discussed. In the second part, the various approaches for the production of optimized monoclonal antibodies used for anti-cancer vaccination are summarized.     

Various uses of BCG and allogeneic acute leukemia cells to treat patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

Summary Ninety-six remission patients with acute myelogenous leukemia have been treated with various forms of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in three distinct studies and the clinical outcome of these patients has been reported. In the first study 22 patients were maintained on chemotherapy alone and 28 patients were given the same chemotherapy and additional immunotherapy consisting of BCG and irradiated allogeneic AML cells given at separate sites weekly. It was found that there was a significant increase in survival time of the patients who received immunotherapy (median 510 days) compared with the chemotherapy alone patients (270 days). The p value for this was 0.03. The reason for this prolongation of survival was mainly due to a markedly increased survival time of immunotherapy patients after they relapsed when compared with the chemotherapy patients (165 days compared with 75 days median, p equal to 0.0005). In the second sequential study 24 patients were given immunotherapy alone consisting of irradiated allogeneic AML cells and BCG given at separate sites, and this was compared with unirradiated allogeneic cells and BCG given to 22 patients. There was no difference in the remission length or survival between these two groups. In the third study 13 patients received irradiated cells and BCG as in Study 1 and a further 11 patients received the same immunotherapy but also received a mixture of cells and BCG given during the first three months. There was no difference in the remission and survival of these two groups. The significance of these results is discussed.     

肠道微生物对肿瘤发生发展及化疗药物的影响

肠道微生物群在多种肿瘤发生发展过程中的作用引起了人们的广泛关注,近几年大量研究表明微生物群与肿瘤之间有着密切的关系。它们不仅可以与宿主共代谢,对肿瘤治疗产生正面或负面影响,还可以直接促进或消除化疗药物的疗效并介导药物的毒性,从而干预肿瘤的治疗。此外,肠道微生物能够介导免疫疗法,增强患者对肿瘤的免疫应答能力。在此综述中,我们概述了肠道微生物在肿瘤治疗中的意义,揭示其对化疗药物及免疫疗法的影响,并总结多种治疗肿瘤的潜在机制。不仅展现了肠道微生物研究对临床治疗肿瘤的意义,也为临床协助肿瘤治疗提供更多的思路。     

Antitumor effect of intratumoral administration of dendritic cell combination with vincristine chemotherapy in a murine fibrosarcoma model

A new antitumor therapeutic strategy utilizing the combined effect of chemotherapy and DC (dendritic cell)-based immunotherapy was designed, and the effect of intratumoral injections of unpulsed, immature DCs was evaluated after in vivo pretreatment of vincristine on tumor growth in a murine fibrosarcoma tumor model. Vincristine exerted a much more potent apoptosis/necrosis-inducing effect on MCA-102 tumor cells than on DCs both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, CD11c, CD40, CD80 and CD86 molecules on DCs were not downregulated after treatment with vincristine either in vitro or in vivo. The growth of tumor significantly regressed in the group which received the combined vincristine chemotherapy with intratumoral administration of DCs in contrast to the untreated group, the group treated with DCs alone, and the group treated with vincristine alone. In particular, an upregulated expression of CD40, CD80 and CD86 molecules on DCs was found in the combination treatment group. Furthermore, the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and the staining intensity of their CD4 and CD8 surface molecules also increased after the combination treatment. Therefore, our results indicate the feasibility of this combination therapy with vincristine chemotherapy and DC-based immunotherapy as an efficient antitumor strategy for the treatment of fibrosarcoma.     

Strategies for improving antitumor activity utilizing IL-2: Preclinical models and analysis of antitumor activity of lymphocytes from patients receiving IL-2

Conclusions Considerable enthusiasm remains for the successful utilization of the immune system for the immunotherapy of human cancers. Immunotherapeutic maneuvers have been able to mediate impressive antitumor responses for some patients with advanced and refractory malignancies. Unfortunately, the number of patients who benefit from current immunotherapies is low, while the toxicity for many of the patients receiving these treatments is high. It is becoming quite clear that the development of successful immunotherapeutic strategies will involve a carefully chosen combination of immunotherapeutic modalities or of immunotherapy combined with either surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. The use of an IL-2 based regimen which is clinically tolerable and can provide significant immune activation continues to remain central to many of these treatment approaches. Preclinicalin vitro and animal model systems can evaluate promising treatment strategies, including combination approaches. As an effective immunotherapeutic approach will likely require use of a combination of biologically active agents, the scheduling of these therapies may have profound importance both for optimal antitumor responses as well as clinical tolerance.     

Mechanism of synergistic effect of chemotherapy and immunotherapy of cancer

In recent years, the combination of cancer immunotherapy with standard therapeutic modality is gaining credibility due to a number of clinical trials demonstrating therapeutic success of such combination therapies. However, the mechanism of this phenomenon is poorly understood. Here, we will discuss recent findings that suggest novel mechanisms of synergistic effect of cancer immunotherapy and chemotherapy.     

Immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer

The treatment of superficial bladder cancer requires adjuvant therapies besides transurethral resection because of a high recurrence rate after this standard treatment alone. Current adjuvant therapies involve intravesical chemotherapy for patients at low and intermediate risk for recurrence and progression, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin for patients at intermediate and high risk. However, these adjuvant therapies fail in a significant number of patients, dictating the need for new and improved adjuvant treatment modalities for superficial bladder cancer. Immunotherapy aiming at the modulation of the immune system of the patient is a promising alternative adjuvant. This review discusses the current status of the clinical development of various immunotherapy approaches for superficial bladder cancer, including passive immunotherapy, immune stimulants, immunogene therapy and cancer vaccination.     

Immune modulation by dendritic-cell-based cancer vaccines

The interplay between host immunity and tumour cells has opened the possibility of targeting tumour cells by modulation of the human immune system. Cancer immunotherapy involves the treatment of a tumour by utilizing the recombinant human immune system components to target the pro-tumour microenvironment or by revitalizing the immune system with the ability to kill tumour cells by priming the immune cells with tumour antigens. In this review, current immunotherapy approaches to cancer with special focus on dendritic cell (DC)-based cancer vaccines are discussed. Some of the DC-based vaccines under clinical trials for various cancer types are highlighted. Establishing tumour immunity involves a plethora of immune components and pathways; hence, combining chemotherapy, radiation therapy and various arms of immunotherapy, after analysing the benefits of individual therapeutic agents, might be beneficial to the patient.     

Active immunotherapy of L1210 leukemia with neuraminidase-treated,drug-resistant L1210 sublines

Summary The effectiveness of neuraminidase-treated, drug-resistant L1210 sublines in active immunotherapy of L1210 leukemia was evaluated. Optimal conditions for the establishment of in vitro, drug-resistant cells included (a) proper drug concentration, (b) the use of logarithmic-phase cultures in fresh medium, containing 5 or 10% serum, and (c) continual exposure to drug. Active immunotherapy, after tumor burden was reduced with chemotherapy, with neuraminidase-treated cells alone was either effective or deleterious, depending upon the drug-resistant subline used for immunization. The combination of BCG and neuraminidase-treated cells was superior to treatment with chemotherapy only. Optimal response was observed with the use of parental L1210 cells, combined with BCG, in immunotherapy of parental L1210 tumor. The results emphasize that an important prerequisite to successful immunotherapy is that tumor vaccines must elicit immunologic products which are cytotoxic for residual tumor.Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Science Degree, University of Oklahoma     

A randomized trial of chemoimmunotherapy of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in adults using a protein-bound polysaccharide preparation

Summary The effect of immunotherapy with a protein-bound polysaccharide preparation termed PSK on remission duration and survival of adults with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) was studied in a prospective randomized cooperative trial. After having achieved complete remission and receiving a consolidation therapy, 73 patients were randomized either to maintenance chemotherapy or to maintenance chemotherapy plus immunotherapy with PSK. Ultimately 36 patients in the chemotherapy group and 31 in the chemoimmunotherapy group were evaluable. Six months after the last entry, immunotherapy with PSK showed a borderline beneficial effect on remission duration (P=0.089) and on duration of survival (P=0.062). When the data were analyzed 12, 18, and 24 months after the last entry there were no significant differences in duration of remission and survival between the two groups. However, analysis of the data of patients who had maintained complete remission for more than 270 days revealed that immunotherapy had a suggestive beneficial effect (P=0.105), prolonging the 50% remission period by 418 days (885 vs 467 days). Thus, immunotherapy with PSK seems to be active in the treatment of adult ANLL when used for maintenance therapy in combination with chemotherapy, especially in patients with a good prognosis.     

嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗的现状与展望

肿瘤严重威胁着人类健康,当前肿瘤传统的治疗方法有手术治疗、化疗、放疗和靶向药物治疗等。近年来,肿瘤免疫治疗,尤其是嵌合抗原受体（chimeric antigen receptor,CAR） T细胞免疫疗法在基础研究与临床应用中蓬勃发展,并在治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤方面取得了巨大成功。然而,大量研究显示,细胞免疫治疗后可出现不同程度的毒副反应,且部分患者缓解后再次复发。因此,了解细胞治疗面临的挑战与局限性,寻找解决的办法,对继续发挥细胞免疫疗法的潜能具有重要意义。本文就免疫细胞的CAR结构、病毒载体的选择、细胞治疗面临的挑战及前景进行综述。     

Optimal control for selected cancer chemotherapy ODE models: a view on the potential of optimal schedules and choice of objective function

In this article, four different mathematical models of chemotherapy from the literature are investigated with respect to optimal control of drug treatment schedules. The various models are based on two different sets of ordinary differential equations and contain either chemotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy or combinations of these. Optimal control problem formulations based on these models are proposed, discussed and compared. For different parameter sets, scenarios, and objective functions optimal control problems are solved numerically with Bock’s direct multiple shooting method.In particular, we show that an optimally controlled therapy can be the reason for the difference between a growing and a totally vanishing tumor in comparison to standard treatment schemes and untreated or wrongly treated tumors. Furthermore, we compare different objective functions. Eventually, we propose an optimization-driven indicator for the potential gain of optimal controls. Based on this indicator, we show that there is a high potential for optimization of chemotherapy schedules, although the currently available models are not yet appropriate for transferring the optimal therapies into medical practice due to patient-, cancer-, and therapy-specific components.     

Immune therapy of melanoma: Overview of therapeutic vaccines

Melanoma is the most serious type of skin cancer which develops from the occurrence of genetic mutations in the melanocytes. Based on the features of melanoma tumors such as location, genetic profile and stage, there are several therapeutic strategies including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, because of the appearance resistance mechanisms, the efficiency of these treatments strategies may be reduced. It has been demonstrated that therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can improve the efficiency of melanoma therapies. Recently, several mAbs, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, were approved for the immunotherapy of melanoma. The antibodies inhibit immune checkpoint receptors such as CTL4 and pd-1. Another therapeutic strategy for the treatment of melanoma is cancer vaccines, which improve clinical outcomes in patients. The combination therapy using antibodies and gene vaccine give us a new perspective in the treatment of melanoma patients. Herein, we present the recent progressions in the melanoma immunotherapy, especially dendritic cells mRNA vaccines by reviewing recent literature.     

Cytokines as potential combination agents with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for cancer treatment

Immunotherapy has caused a paradigm shift in the treatment of several malignancies, particularly the blockade of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its specific receptor/ligand PD-L1 that have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies, but significant durable responses only occur in a small percentage of patients, and other patients failed to respond to the treatment. Even those who initially respond can ultimately relapse despite maintenance treatment, there is considerable potential for synergistic combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors into conventional cancer treatments. The clinical experience in the use of cytokines in the clinical setting indicated the efficiency of cytokine therapy in cancer immunotherapy. Combinational approaches to enhancing PD-L1/PD-1 pathways blockade efficacy with several cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-2, IL-15, IL-21, IL-12, IL-10, and interferon-α (IFN-α) may result in additional benefits. In this review, the current state of knowledge about PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the date in the literature to ascertain the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with cytokines is discussed. Finally, it is noteworthy that novel therapeutic approaches based on the efficient combination of recombinant cytokines with the PD-L1/PD-1 blockade therapy can enhance antitumor immune responses against various malignancies.     

Targeting the immune system: novel therapeutic approaches in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the overall survival rates for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have not changed over the last decades. Clearly, novel therapeutic strategies are needed for this cancer, which is highly immunosuppressive. Therefore, biologic therapies able to induce and/or up-regulate antitumor immune responses could represent a complementary approach to conventional treatments. Because patients with SCCHN are frequently immunocompromised due to the elimination or dysfunction of critical effector cells of the immune system, it might be necessary to restore these immune functions to allow for the generation of more effective antitumor host responses. Simultaneously, to prevent tumor escape, it might be necessary to alter attributes of the malignant cells. The present review summarizes recent advances in the field of immunotherapy of SCCHN, including techniques of nonspecific immune stimulation, the use of monoclonal antibodies, advances in adoptive immunotherapy and genetic engineering, as well as anticancer vaccines. These biologic therapies, alone or in combination with conventional treatment, are likely to develop into useful future treatment options for patients with SCCHN.     

Disruption of T cell regulatory pathways is necessary for immunotherapeutic cure of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in mice

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in children. In recent years, the outcome has been globally improved by current therapies, but it remains poor in patients with high, persistent residual disease following the first course of chemotherapy, prompting evaluation of the possible beneficial effects of immunotherapy protocols. In this study, we hypothesized that the disruption of two immunoregulatory pathways controlling the auto-reactive T cell response might synergize with dendritic cell-based immunotherapy of the disease, which is considered to be poorly immunogenic. In this study, we used TAL1xLMO1 leukemia cells adoptively transferred in mice, to generate murine leukemia with poorly immunogenic cells as a model for human T-ALL. Subsequently, these animals were treated with several different immunotherapeutic protocols. We compared the efficiency of a classical, dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (injection of dendritic cells loaded with tumor-derived antigenic products), to a combined treatment associating injection of antigen-loaded dendritic cells and disruption of the two immunoregulatory pathways: CD25+ suppressive T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigens (CTLA-4). We show that this combined treatment resulted in cure, concomitantly with in vivo generation of immune memory, and TNF-alpha secretion. This study demonstrates that the disruption of these two immunoregulatory pathways synergized with immunostimulation by dendritic cells loaded with tumor-derived antigens, and paves the way for the testing of this combination in clinical trials.     

Histologic evaluation of L1210 leukemia in treated and untreated mice

Summary BDF₁ mice bearing L1210 leukemia were treated with chemotherapy or in combination with neuraminidase-treated cells and BCG. Histological evaluation was done on these mice at various intervals after therapy in order to determine the rate and extent of metastatic involvement in various tissues and organs. Results were compared to tumor-bearing mice which were not treated. In all animals, tissues were classed as having minimal involvement, moderate involvement or maximal involvement based on a scale of 0 through 4. Results indicated that: (a) mice which were long term survivors did not completely reject their tumor for weeks after treatment with chemotherapy and immunotherapy; (b) complete tumor rejection did not indicate a restoration of normal tissue integrity; and (c) failure of chemotherapy-immunotherapy had no consistent pathology, but was probably due to tumor distribution rather then tumor burden per se.This study was supported, in part, by Contract No. NO1-CB-43864 and Grant No. CA 14460 from the National Cancer InstituteThe Abbreviations used are: BCNU; 1,3-bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitros-ourea; Saline: 0.9% NaCl solution; BCG: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; C. parvum: Corynebacterium parvum; pfu: plaque-forming units